DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Market Assessment for Protection of Women Through Empowerment and Response (POWER) Project Funded by USAID

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Market Assessment for Protection of Women Through Empowerment and Response (POWER) Project Funded by USAID Report Market Assessment For Protection of Women through Empowerment and Response (POWER) Project Funded by USAID INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE –SIERRA LEONE PROGRAM 35 FRAZER STREET, OFF WILKINSON RD, FREETOWN, SIERRA LEONE | RESCUE.ORG Photo Credit: Simon Olagai, August 2019, Think Africa Institute®: Paniga Community, Simbaru Chiefdom A Think Africa Institute (SM) Product This study is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the International Rescue Committee and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Compilation Tsike-Sossah, S.E – Lead Consultant IRC-Sierra Leone – POWER Project Market Assessment – Final Report| Think Africa Institute Page 2 Olagai, S – Field Lead Pometsey, R – Data Analyst Executive Summary The IRC Market Assessment Survey is the outcome of research commissioned by IRC – Sierra Leone Programme office conducted by Think Africa Institute (TAI). The project, “Protection of Women through Empowerment and Response (POWER), is funded by the USAID. POWER seeks to “empower women and girls to pursue their potential, free from violence and inequality”. The POWER project hinges on three pillars—economic empowerment, gender-transformative social engagement and GBV response—to comprehensively address the barriers to women’s safety and empowerment in Sierra Leone. TAI collected and analysed data from 750 respondents from across 20 communities within 4 chiefdoms in the Kenema district. 55% of the respondents were females while 45% were males. Further, the survey found more women saved through Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLA), 53% against 34.8 by men. In this report, rice (both local and imported), Gari, Lappa (fabric), transportation (poda- poda/motor bikes), vegetables and fruits were found to be the goods with trading potential. Second-hand clothes (Junks) was also popular among the respondents. Rice (local and imported) was established as the staple food in all the chiefdom; Dodo for example rated it as much as 99.1%. The findings established there exists gaps and opportunities in the communities and markets. The findings show mobile vending services such as sale of call minutes sales and mobile money (MoMo) transfer services are feasible opportunities. Also exciting would be transport businesses that would allow for carting produce to and from the communities. IRC-Sierra Leone – POWER Project Market Assessment – Final Report| Think Africa Institute Page 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 3 Introduction and Background ...................................................................... 5 Project Outcomes ............................................................................................. 5 About the Project ..................................................................................... 6 Project Summary and Scope ............................................................................................ 6 Methodology and Tasks .................................................................................................. 7 Summary of Results .......................................................................................... 9 Data Analysis ......................................................................................... 10 Representation by Chiefdom and Community ....................................................... 10 Gender Distribution ........................................................................................ 10 Age Distribution ............................................................................................................11 What are the Popular Goods/Services in the Communities ..............................................11 Products/Services Which Provide the Most Benefits ........................................................12 Savings ..........................................................................................................................12 Goods with Trade(ing) Potential ........................................................................ 16 Value Addition ..............................................................................................................16 Distribution of Products/Services ...................................................................................17 Gaps and Opportunities ............................................................................ 17 Gaps ........................................................................................................... 17 Opportunities ................................................................................................ 18 Conclusion ............................................................................................ 18 Appendices ............................................................................................ 20 Appendix 1: Sample Size Determination .............................................................. 20 Appendix 2 Chiefdoms and Communities for POWER Project ........................................21 Appendix 3: Data Collection Tools .................................................................................22 References .................................................................................................... 23 Figure 1: Chiefdom and Community Representation of Respondents ................................................. 10 Figure 2: Sex Distribution ...................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Age Distribution ..................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4: Popular Goods/Products/Services ......................................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Products/Services Which Provide the Most Benefit .............................................................. 12 Figure 6: Savings by Gender .................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 7: Savings by Age ........................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 8: Dama Chiefdom Saving Pattern by Sex .................................................................................. 14 IRC-Sierra Leone – POWER Project Market Assessment – Final Report| Think Africa Institute Page 4 Figure 9: Dodo Chiefdom: Saving Pattern by Sex ................................................................................. 14 Figure 10: Niawa Chiefdom Saving Pattern by Sex ............................................................................... 15 Figure 11: Simbaru Chiefdom Saving Pattern by Sex ............................................................................ 15 Figure 12: Goods with Trading Potential across 5 Chiefdoms .............................................................. 16 Figure 13: Who Does the Selling of Products/Services ......................................................................... 17 Introduction and Background Following the signing of the contract for the consultancy services for conducting market assessment on the 9th August 2019, the consultant embarked on the assignments as defined in the Terms of Reference (ToR) and in the scope of work. The assignment started two weeks after signing of the contract. The delay for the start of this work was due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of Think Africa Institute (TAI) and the IRC. This report provides a status report on the progress of the work done so far by the Project Team. The report contains the plan for the comprehensive survey study approach and methodology in conducting a market assessment to analyse the demand and supply sides of potential products to invest. One of the purposes of the survey being to (a) Lead the IRC POWER project team in conducting the aforementioned market study; (b) analyse the characteristics and composition of the labour market in the district; (c) Identify available trade-wise opportunities and suggestions on training requirements as well as provide appropriate recommendation for economic empowerment project. Following initial meetings with IRC POWER Project Team aimed at clarifying the Terms of Reference and the strategy for the implementation of the consultancy, the team proceeded to conduct orientation training of enumerators and preliminary sampling of the project target beneficiaries for the proposed market assessment study. Project Outcomes The project components are grouped into three outcomes: Outcome 1: Women have increased economic resources. Over two years, IRC staff will oversee the self-selection of 40 25-member VSLAs in Kenema district and deliver business skills training to all 1,000 VSLA members. Upon completion of the training, VSLA members will receive individual business grants to launch or expand their enterprises. Outcome 2: Women safely voice their priorities and participate in decisions that affect themselves and their homes. Over two years, IRC staff will conduct the Discussion Group Series (DGS) with all 1,000 VSLA members and their spouses (or other relevant family members). In year one, IRC staff will conduct the Engaging Men through Accountable Practice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Rescue Committee Sierra Leone 72063618CA00001 Q2 Narrative Report (POWER) Jan-Mar ‘19
    International Rescue Committee Sierra Leone 72063618CA00001 Q2 Narrative Report (POWER) Jan-Mar ‘19 INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE SIERRA LEONE QUARTERLY REPORT PROTECTION OF WOMEN THROUGH EMPOWERMENT AND RESPONSE (POWER) AGREEMENT NO: 72063618CA00001 January 1 – March 31, 2019 PRESENTED TO: THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID) Collaborating Partner: Agency Headquarters: International Rescue Committee Sierra International Rescue Committee Leone c/o Erika Pearl, Program Officer c/o Saffea Senessie, Country Director Tel : +1 212 377 4019 Tel: +232 (0) 76 622998 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] April 30, 2019 International Rescue Committee Sierra Leone 72063618CA00001 Q2 Narrative Report (POWER) Jan-Mar ‘19 Table of Contents I. General Information ............................................................................................................ ii II. Abbreviations...................................................................................................................... iii III. Project Description............................................................................................................... 1 IV. Summary of Quarterly Accomplishment and Successes ..................................................... 2 V. Description of Quarterly Achievements by Results ............................................................ 5 VI. Partnership and Coordination .............................................................................................. 8 VII. Travel
    [Show full text]
  • CDF Trial Transcript
    Case No. SCSL-2004-14-T THE PROSECUTOR OF THE SPECIAL COURT V. SAM HINGA NORMAN MOININA FOFANA ALLIEU KONDEWA WEDNESDAY, 22 FEBRUARY 2006 9.40 A.M. TRIAL TRIAL CHAMBER I Before the Judges: Pierre Boutet, Presiding Bankole Thompson Benjamin Mutanga Itoe For Chambers: Ms Roza Salibekova Ms Anna Matas For the Registry: Mr Geoff Walker For the Prosecution: Mr Desmond De Silva Mr Kevin Tavener Mr Joseph Kamara Ms Bianca Suciu (Case Manager) For the Principal Defender: NO APPEARANCE For the accused Sam Hinga Dr Bu-Buakei Jabbi Norman: Mr Alusine Sesay Ms Claire da Silva (legal assistant) Mr Kingsley Belle (legal assistant) For the accused Moinina Fofana: Mr Arrow Bockarie Mr Andrew Ianuzzi For the accused Allieu Kondewa: Mr Ansu Lansana NORMAN ET AL Page 2 22 FEBRUARY 2006 OPEN SESSION 1 [CDF22FEB06A - CR] 2 Wednesday, 22 February 2006 3 [Open session] 4 [The accused present] 09:36:33 5 [Upon resuming at 9.40 a.m.] 6 WITNESS: LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARDS [Continued] 7 PRESIDING JUDGE: Good morning, Dr Jabbi. Good morning, 8 Mr Witness. Dr Jabbi, when we adjourned yesterday we were back 9 at you with re-examination, if any. You had indicated that you 09:40:46 10 did have some. 11 MR JABBI: Yes, My Lord. 12 PRESIDING JUDGE: Are you prepared to proceed now? 13 MR JABBI: Yes, My Lord. 14 PRESIDING JUDGE: Please do so. 09:40:59 15 RE-EXAMINED BY MR JABBI: 16 Q. Good morning, General. 17 A. Good morning. 18 Q. Just one or two points of clarification.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanist Watch Salone (Huwasal) 2012 Annual Report
    HUMANIST WATCH SALONE (HUWASAL) 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 29 HUMONYA AVENUE KENEMA CITY KENEMA DISTRICT EASTERN PROVINCE OF SIERRA LEONE Email: [email protected] Contact phone Number(s): +232779075/+23276582937. P O Box 102 Kenema 2012 Annual Report on Humanist Watch Salone Activities Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENT ACKONWLEDGEMENT INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF HUMANIST WATCH SALONE ACCOMPLISHMENT GENDER EQUITY AND WOMEN EMPOWERMENT CHILD PROTECTION PROGRAMME HEALTH HUMAN RIGHTS AND GOOD GOVERNANCE YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AFFLILIATION SOURCES OF FUNDING LESSONS LEARNT/OUTCOMES CONCLUSION 2012 Annual Report on Humanist Watch Salone Activities Page 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We wish to extend thanks to our generous donor partners such as UNDP Access to Justice Programme, Amnesty International Sierra Leone, International Rescue Committee (IRC/GBV Programme), International Foundation for Election System (IFES) and Global Xchange/ VSO for both financial and technical support accorded to Humanist Watch Salone towards the implementation of its programme-projects in 2012. Moreover our sincere thanks and appreciation goes to our Advisory Board for providing support towards effective and efficient running of the day –to- day affairs of Humanist Watch Salone. Special and heartfelt thanks to our civil society partners and state actors and lastly, we extend a very big thanks to all our staff members for their restless effort behind the successes of our activities in 2012. 2012 Annual Report on Humanist Watch Salone Activities Page 3 Introduction and Background of Humanist Watch Salone Humanist Watch Salone (HUWASAL) is an indigenous human rights and development organization established in 2003 by a group of visionary and courageous human rights activists and development workers. The organization started as Community-Based organization and is now registered with Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MoFED) as National Non- Governmental Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in Development Economics
    Essays in Development Economics The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Reed, Tristan. 2014. Essays in Development Economics. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12274109 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Essays in Development Economics A dissertation presented by Tristan Reed to The Department of Economics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Economics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2014 c 2014 Tristan Reed All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Author: Professor Andrei Shleifer Tristan Reed Essays in Development Economics Abstract This dissertation comprises three essays in development economics. Chapter One studies how constraints on the political power of elites shape economic and social life. In Sierra Leone, we document that areas in which chiefs face less political competition have significantly worse development outcomes today—in particular, lower rates of educational attainment, child health, non-agricultural employment and asset ownership. Paradoxically, we also show that in chiefdoms with less competition the institutions of chiefs’ authority are more highly respected among villagers, and measured social capital is higher. We argue that these results reflect the capture of civil society organizations by chiefs. Chapter Two develops a new “spatial Lewis model” of industrialization across space in order to study a policy of the Indian government that reallocated capital to less developed regions of the country that nonetheless had large populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone
    Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Acemoglu, Daron, Tristan Reed, and James A. Robinson. “Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Political Economy 122, no. 2 (April 2014): 319– 368. © 2014 The University of Chicago. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/674988 Publisher University of Chicago Press, The Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96712 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone Author(s): Daron Acemoglu, Tristan Reed, and James A. Robinson Source: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 122, No. 2 (April 2014), pp. 319-368 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/674988 . Accessed: 09/03/2015 14:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of Sierra Leone Act, 1991
    CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT SUPPLEMENT TO THE SIERRA LEONE GAZETTE EXTRAORIDARY VOL. CXXXVIII, NO. 16 dated 18th April, 2007 CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT NO. 5 OF 2007 Published 18th April, 2007 THE CONSTITUTION OF SIERRA LEONE, 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (DECLARATION OF CONSTITUENCIES) Short tittle ORDER, 2007 In exercise of the powers conferred upon him by Subsection (1) of section 38 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone 1991, the Electoral Commission hereby makes the following Order:- For the purpose of electing the ordinary Members of Parliament, Division of Sierra Leone Sierra Leone is hereby divided into one hundred and twelve into Constituencies. constituencies as described in the Schedule. 2 3 Name and Code Description SCHEDULE of Constituency EASTERN REGION KAILAHUN DISTRICT Kailahun This Constituency comprises of the whole of upper Bambara and District part of Luawa Chiefdom with the following sections; Gao, Giehun, Costituency DESCRIPTION OF CONSTITUENCIES 2 Lower Kpombali and Mende Buima. Name and Code Description of Constituency (NEC The constituency boundary starts in the northwest where the Chiefdom Const. 002) boundaries of Kpeje Bongre, Luawa and Upper Bambara meet. It follows the northern section boundary of Mende Buima and Giehun, then This constituency comprises of part of Luawa Chiefdom southwestern boundary of Upper Kpombali to meet the Guinea with the following sections: Baoma, Gbela, Luawa boundary. It follows the boundary southwestwards and south to where Foguiya, Mano-Sewallu, Mofindo, and Upper Kpombali. the Dea and Upper Bambara Chiefdom boundaries meet. It continues along the southern boundary of Upper Bambara west to the Chiefdom (NEC Const. The constituency boundary starts along the Guinea/ Sierra Leone boundaries of Kpeje Bongre and Mandu.
    [Show full text]
  • War and the Crisis of Youth in Sierra Leone
    This page intentionally left blank War and the Crisis of Youth in Sierra Leone The armed conflict in Sierra Leone and the extreme violence of the main rebel faction – the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) – have challenged scholars and members of the international community to come up with explanations. Up to this point, though, conclusions about the nature of the war and the RUF are mainly drawn from accounts of civilian victims or based on interpretations and rationalisations offered by commentators who had access to only one side of the war. The present study addresses this currently incomplete understanding of the conflict by focusing on the direct experiences and interpretations of protagonists, paying special attention to the hitherto neglected, and often underage, cadres of the RUF. The data presented challenge the widely canvassed notion of the Sierra Leone conflict as a war motivated by ‘greed, not grievance’. Rather, it points to a rural crisis expressed in terms of unresolved tensions between landowners and marginalised rural youth – an unaddressed crisis of youth that currently manifests itself in many African countries – further reinforced and triggered by a collapsing patrimonial state. Krijn Peters, a rural development sociologist by background, is a lec- turer in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University, Wales. He specialises in armed conflict and post-war recon- struction, focusing primarily on the disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration of child soldiers and youthful combatants. Peters is the co-author of War and Children (2009) and a Visiting Fellow at VU University, Amsterdam. Advance Praise for War and the Crisis of Youth in Sierra Leone ‘This book goes more deeply into an understanding of RUF fighters – their beliefs and their atrocities – than previous studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 1 The process and practice of diagnosis: innovations in diagnostics for Lassa fever in Sierra Leone Ann Wilkinson Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2013 SPRU University of Sussex 2 WORK NOT SUBMITTED ELSEWHERE FOR EXAMINATION I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature:………………………………………................................................ 3 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Ann Wilkinson Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science and Technology Policy Research The process and practice of diagnosis: innovations in diagnostics for Lassa fever in Sierra Leone Summary This thesis is about the process and practice of diagnosis and the implications of new diagnostic technologies in low resource settings. As a setting and a disease which has seen significant investment in diagnostics, Lassa fever in Sierra Leone has been selected as a case study to examine these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline for Democracy and Governance Project, Search For
    Baseline for Democracy and Governance Project Search for Common Ground Background Over the next three-year period, Sierra Leone must capitalize on the opportunities provided by the end of the civil conflict to ensure a peaceful transition into a long-term development phase. These opportunities include: • the discourse of public participation and dialogue • tolerance for openness and freedom of the press • implementation of a decentralization policy and structural reforms. Media tolerance and diversification is central to a wider and broader range of available public information. A viable and functioning public information network supports deeper analysis on issues and the mobilization of the population for engagement in governance processes, including local and national elections, anti-corruption initiatives, and budgetary monitoring, among others. Search for Common Ground in Sierra Leone (SFCG) with the support of the United States Agency for International Development through cooperative agreement 636-A-00-05-00040 is supporting these transformation processes over the next three to five years. Capitalizing on new entry points created by governance reform and decentralization, SFCG, using its trusted media tools integrated with community outreach, will support the creation of demand for good governance and accountable leadership through participation, engagement and good citizenship. SFCG’s overarching goal for its democracy and governance project is to: Strengthen democratic governance in the districts of Kono, Kailahun, and Koinadugu, and Tongo Fields in Sierra Leone, which supports Special Objective #2 (SO2) under USAID/Sierra Leone’s Transition Strategy Phase 2, (FY 2004-2006). SFCG’s program objective is to: Stimulate an active citizenry. This supports Intermediate Result (IR) 2.2: “Citizens, local government, and CSOs better informed on democratic governance” of SO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone
    Working paper Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone Daron Acemoglu Tristan Reed James A. Robinson September 2013 When citing this paper, please use the title and the following reference number: S-2012-SLE-1 Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone⇤ Daron Acemoglu† Tristan Reed ‡ James A. Robinson§ September 26, 2013 Abstract We use the colonial organization of chieftaincy in Sierra Leone to study the e↵ect of con- straints on chiefs’ power on economic outcomes, citizens’ attitudes and social capital. A paramount chief must come from one of the ruling families originally recognized by British colonial authorities. Chiefs face fewer constraints and less political competition in chiefdoms with fewer ruling families. We show that places with fewer ruling families have significantly worse development outcomes today—in particular, lower rates of educational attainment, child health, non-agricultural employment and asset ownership. We present evidence that variation in the security of property rights in land is a potential mechanism. Paradoxically we also show that in chiefdoms with fewer ruling families the institutions of chiefs’ authority are more highly respected among villagers, and measured social capital is higher. We argue that these results reflect the capture of civil society organizations by chiefs. JEL Classification: D72, O12, N27 Keywords: Economic Development, Elite Control, Political Economy, Social Capital. ⇤We thank Mohammed C. Bah, Alimamy Bangura, Alieu K. Bangura, Mohammed Bangura, Lyttleton Braima, Shaka Kamara, Solomon Kamara, Bai Santigie Kanu, Salieu Mansaray, Michael Sevalie, Alusine M. Tarawalie, and David J. Walters for their work in collecting the data on the histories of chieftaincies and ruling families.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierraleone Local Council Ward Boundary Delimitation Report
    NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION Sierra Leone Local Council Ward Boundary Delimitation Report Volume Two Meets and Bounds April 2008 Table of Contents Preface ii A. Eastern region 1. Kailahun District Council 1 2. Kenema City Council 9 3. Kenema District Council 12 4. Koidu/New Sembehun City Council 22 5. Kono District Council 26 B. Northern Region 1. Makeni City Council 34 2. Bombali District Council 37 3. Kambia District Council 45 4. Koinadugu District Council 51 5. Port Loko District Council 57 6. Tonkolili District Council 66 C. Southern Region 1. Bo City Council 72 2. Bo District Council 75 3. Bonthe Municipal Council 80 4. Bonthe District Council 82 5. Moyamba District Council 86 6. Pujehun District Council 92 D. Western Region 1. Western Area Rural District Council 97 2. Freetown City Council 105 i Preface This part of the report on Electoral Ward Boundaries Delimitation process is a detailed description of each of the 394 Local Council Wards nationwide, comprising of Chiefdoms, Sections, Streets and other prominent features defining ward boundaries. It is the aspect that deals with the legal framework for the approved wards _____________________________ Dr. Christiana A. M Thorpe Chief Electoral Commissioner and Chair ii CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT No………………………..of 2008 Published: THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 2004 (Act No. 1 of 2004) THE KAILAHUN DISTRICT COUNCIL (ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCALITY AND DELIMITATION OF WARDS) Order, 2008 Short title In exercise of the powers conferred upon him by subsection (2) of Section 2 of the Local Government Act, 2004, the President, acting on the recommendation of the Minister of Internal Affairs, Local Government and Rural Development, the Minister of Finance and Economic Development and the National Electoral Commission, hereby makes the following Order:‐ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chiefdoms of Sierra Leone
    The Chiefdoms of Sierra Leone Tristan Reed1 James A. Robinson2 July 15, 2013 1Harvard University, Department of Economics, Littauer Center, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge MA 02138; E-mail: [email protected]. 2Harvard University, Department of Government, IQSS, 1737 Cambridge Street., N309, Cambridge MA 02138; E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract1 In this manuscript, a companion to Acemoglu, Reed and Robinson (2013), we provide a detailed history of Paramount Chieftaincies of Sierra Leone. British colonialism transformed society in the country in 1896 by empowering a set of Paramount Chiefs as the sole authority of local government in the newly created Sierra Leone Protectorate. Only individuals from the designated \ruling families" of a chieftaincy are eligible to become Paramount Chiefs. In 2011, we conducted a survey in of \encyclopedias" (the name given in Sierra Leone to elders who preserve the oral history of the chieftaincy) and the elders in all of the ruling families of all 149 chieftaincies. Contemporary chiefs are current up to May 2011. We used the survey to re- construct the history of the chieftaincy, and each family for as far back as our informants could recall. We then used archives of the Sierra Leone National Archive at Fourah Bay College, as well as Provincial Secretary archives in Kenema, the National Archives in London and available secondary sources to cross-check the results of our survey whenever possible. We are the first to our knowledge to have constructed a comprehensive history of the chieftaincy in Sierra Leone. 1Oral history surveys were conducted by Mohammed C. Bah, Alimamy Bangura, Alieu K.
    [Show full text]