Harry Gideon Wells 1875-1943 by Esmond R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Peptide Chemistry up to Its Present State
Appendix In this Appendix biographical sketches are compiled of many scientists who have made notable contributions to the development of peptide chemistry up to its present state. We have tried to consider names mainly connected with important events during the earlier periods of peptide history, but could not include all authors mentioned in the text of this book. This is particularly true for the more recent decades when the number of peptide chemists and biologists increased to such an extent that their enumeration would have gone beyond the scope of this Appendix. 250 Appendix Plate 8. Emil Abderhalden (1877-1950), Photo Plate 9. S. Akabori Leopoldina, Halle J Plate 10. Ernst Bayer Plate 11. Karel Blaha (1926-1988) Appendix 251 Plate 12. Max Brenner Plate 13. Hans Brockmann (1903-1988) Plate 14. Victor Bruckner (1900- 1980) Plate 15. Pehr V. Edman (1916- 1977) 252 Appendix Plate 16. Lyman C. Craig (1906-1974) Plate 17. Vittorio Erspamer Plate 18. Joseph S. Fruton, Biochemist and Historian Appendix 253 Plate 19. Rolf Geiger (1923-1988) Plate 20. Wolfgang Konig Plate 21. Dorothy Hodgkins Plate. 22. Franz Hofmeister (1850-1922), (Fischer, biograph. Lexikon) 254 Appendix Plate 23. The picture shows the late Professor 1.E. Jorpes (r.j and Professor V. Mutt during their favorite pastime in the archipelago on the Baltic near Stockholm Plate 24. Ephraim Katchalski (Katzir) Plate 25. Abraham Patchornik Appendix 255 Plate 26. P.G. Katsoyannis Plate 27. George W. Kenner (1922-1978) Plate 28. Edger Lederer (1908- 1988) Plate 29. Hennann Leuchs (1879-1945) 256 Appendix Plate 30. Choh Hao Li (1913-1987) Plate 31. -
ADOLF BUTENANDT (1903–1995) Robert N. Proctor
Forschungsprogramm „Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus“ Research Program “History of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society in the National Socialist Era” ADOLF BUTENANDT (1903–1995) NOBELPREISTRÄGER, NATIONALSOZIALIST UND MPG-PRÄSIDENT EIN ERSTER BLICK IN DEN NACHLASS Robert N. Proctor Ergebnisse 2 IMPRESSUM Ergebnisse. Vorabdrucke aus dem Forschungsprogramm „Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus“ Herausgegeben von Carola Sachse im Auftrag der Präsidentenkommission der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e. V. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Copyright © 2000 by Robert N. Proctor Lektorat: Astrid Becker Redaktion: Christine Rüter Bezugsadresse: Forschungsprogramm „Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm- Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus“ c/o Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Wilhelmstraße 44 D-10117 Berlin Tel.: 0049–(0)30–2 26 67–154 Fax: 0049–(0)30–2 26 67–333 Email: [email protected] Umschlaggestaltung: punkt 8, Berlin ([email protected]) INHALT Kurzfassung/Abstract 4 Schuld und Sühne 5 Historiographie und „die ganze Wahrheit“ 7 Der Mann und seine Partei 10 Blutforschung und die Zusammenarbeit mit der Luftwaffe 16 TBC-Abwehrforschung mit Verschuer und die Zusammenarbeit mit Hillmann 21 Die Nachkriegsverteidigung Verschuers 26 Butenandts Beziehung zu Neuberg 31 Saubere Wissenschaft – Schmutzige Politik 33 Quellenverzeichnis 36 Literaturverzeichnis 37 Personenregister 40 Autor 41 KURZFASSUNG/ABSTRACT Die Person Adolf Butenandts ist nicht unumstritten in der -
The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics During World War II, 1938/42–1945
Chapter 4 In the Realm of Opportunity: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics during World War II, 1938/42–1945 4.1 The “Reorganization” of the Institute under the Banner of Phenogenetics, 1938–1942 4.1.1 Preliminary Considerations in the Years 1938/42 On March 8, 1940, Eugen Fischer wrote a long, confidential letter to Otmar von Verschuer, director of the Institute for Genetic Biology and Race Hygiene at the University of Frankfurt at that time. In this letter Fischer expressed critique – and certainly also self-critique – about the scientific development of his institute since the mid-1930s. At first glance this critical assessment seems surprising. The KWI-A had prof- ited considerably from the genetic and race policy of the National Socialist regime. Money flowed abundantly, research projects received generous support, the expan- sion of the institute proceeded. As the deputy chairman of the Medical Biology Section of the “Academic Council” of the KWG, and even more so as a member of the Expert Committee for “Anthropology and Ethnology” of the Emergency Association of German Science and the Reich Research Council, respectively, the position Fischer held within his area of expertise was central in terms of research strategy.1 The political prestige and social recognition of the KWI-A, and the scientists working there increased constantly. Fischer himself received a number of honors and accolades in the Third Reich, of which his election to membership in the Prussian Academy of Sciences in 1937 was the most important. Just a year ear- lier, in 1939, Fischer had been awarded the Goethe Medal for Art and Science.2 Yet in March 1940 Fischer was not satisfied with the development of the insti- tute. -
Commemorating the 1913 Michaelismenten
REVIEW ARTICLE Commemorating the 1913 Michaelis–Menten paper Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung: three perspectives Ute Deichmann1, Stefan Schuster2, Jean-Pierre Mazat3,4 and Athel Cornish-Bowden5 1 Jacques Loeb Centre for the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel 2 Department of Bioinformatics, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Germany 3 CNRS-UMR 5095, Bordeaux, France 4 University of Bordeaux, France 5 Unite de Bioenerg etique et Ingenierie des Proteines, Institut de Microbiologie de la Mediterran ee, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Aix-Marseille Universite, France Keywords Methods and equations for analysing the kinetics of enzyme-catalysed reac- enzyme kinetics; Henri; history and tions were developed at the beginning of the 20th century in two centres in philosophy; initial rate; Menten; Michaelis; particular; in Paris, by Victor Henri, and, in Berlin, by Leonor Michaelis steady state and Maud Menten. Henri made a detailed analysis of the work in this area Correspondence that had preceded him, and arrived at a correct equation for the initial rate A. Cornish-Bowden, Unitede of reaction. However, his approach was open to the important objection Bioenerg etique et Ingenierie des Proteines, that he took no account of the hydrogen-ion concentration (a subject lar- Institut de Microbiologie, de la gely undeveloped in his time). In addition, although he wrote down an Mediterran ee, Centre National de la expression for the initial rate of reaction and described the hyperbolic form Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille of its dependence on the substrate concentration, he did not appreciate the Universite, 31 chemin Joseph-Aiguier, great advantages that would come from analysis in terms of initial rates 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France Fax: +33 491 16 40 97 rather than time courses. -
From Bio-Organic Chemistry to Molecular and Synthetic Biology: Fulfilling Emil Fischer’S Dream
International Workshop on the History of Chemistry 2015 Tokyo KEYNOTE LECTURE From Bio-organic Chemistry to Molecular and Synthetic Biology: Fulfilling Emil Fischer’s Dream Jeffrey Allan Johnson Villanova University, USA Introduction The following paper is intended to provide a broad context for many of the subsequent papers of the workshop. I will do this by reflecting on a century of development in one area of the discipline of chemistry, with a particular focus on what I am calling “Emil Fischer’s dream.” In 1915 Fischer envisioned a central aspect of the transformation of chemistry in the twentieth century, the development of an interdisciplinary approach to the chemistry of life that would not only result in greater insight into the nature of life, but ultimately allow human beings to change the nature of life itself. A century later, I believe we can agree that Fischer’s dream is being fulfilled, and as I will argue, the critical developments that have made this possible occurred precisely during the period of the workshop’s primary focus, the 1920s-1960s. I will assess developments in this period, including the loss of German leadership to other nations and the increasingly significant role of Japanese chemists, within the broader context of the development of synthetic-chemical and biochemical technologies applied to the study of living nature during the 20th century as a whole. I would like to divide the era from 1915 to 2005 into three principal generations, the first of which was a generation of crisis bracketed by world wars. Key transitions to new generations occurred around 1945 at the end of the Second World War, and in the mid-1970s, with the advent of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. -
Leonor Michaelis
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES L E O N O R M ICHAELIS 1875—1949 A Biographical Memoir by L E O N O R MI C H A E L I S , D . A . M AC IN N E S A N D S . G RANICK Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1958 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. LEONOR MICHAELIS January 16, 1875—October 8, AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY WITH ADDITIONS BY D. A. MACINNES AND S. GRANICK EONOR MICHAELIS was certainly the most influential scientist, dur- IJ ing the past half century, in the introduction of the methods of physical chemistry into biology and medicine. In this role he served both as investigator and, especially through his publications, as teacher. At the request of the director of the Rockefeller Institute, of which he was a Member, he prepared a brief account of his most unusual career. As it does not appear that this account can be im- proved upon, it is given below, with a few necessary alterations. To this has been appended a description of Dr. Michaelis as he appeared to his friends and coworkers. The autobiography follows: Leonor Michaelis was born January 16, 1875, in Berlin, Germany, in an environment which was far removed from science. He entered a "Gymnasium," from which he graduated in 1893, passing the "Abiturienten Examen," which entitled the bearer of its diploma to acceptance as a student at any German university. -
COLLOIDAL”: CONTROVERSIES in BIOLOGY and BIOCHEMISTRY, 1900–1940* Ute Deichmann, Leo Baeck Institute London, and Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany
Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 32, Number 2 (2007) 105 “MOLECULAR” VERSUS “COLLOIDAL”: CONTROVERSIES IN BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 1900–1940* Ute Deichmann, Leo Baeck Institute London, and Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany Introduction a biochemist and historian, despite highlighting basic flaws of biocolloidy, contradicted Florkin, because in his The development of molecular concepts in biology is opinion Florkin dismissed the importance of the physical- contrasted mainly with the morphological research of chemical approach, in particular the introduction of the cell biologists and the work of classical geneticists. This concept of adsorption by colloid chemists (2). Surpris- has overshadowed a major controversy that, for several ingly, however, Fruton also pointed out that the concept decades, shaped the pre-history of what was later called of adsorption had been developed long before it was molecular biology: namely the controversy between the used by colloid chemists (3). Robert Olby considered molecular and the colloidal conception of the micro- the emphasis on surface phenomena a positive result of structure of cell components. Whereas the molecular colloid chemistry, though he admits that most of the col- conception was based on the notion developed in the 19th loidal work before 1930 has been rejected (4). century of macromolecules—that is, large molecules with physical and chemical individualities, the competing col- Florkin, Fruton, and Olby are in agreement that loidal theory treated antibodies, enzymes, other proteins scientific factors decided the eventual “victory” of the and DNA not as macromolecular entities but as colloidal concept of macromolecules over that of colloidal ag- aggregates of a changing composition. -
Emil Abderhalden – Wikipedia
Emil Abderhalden – Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Abderhalden Emil Abderhalden (* 9. März 1877 in Oberuzwil; † 5. August 1950 in Zürich) war ein Schweizer Physiologe und Physiologischer Chemiker, Mitbegründer der Proteinbiochemie und Präsident der Leopoldina. Inhaltsverzeichnis Biografie Wissenschaftliches Wirken Unterstützung durch die Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft Kritik Mangelhafte Methodik Fehlende Abgrenzung zur nationalsozialistischen Rassentheorie Erfüllungsgehilfe nationalsozialistischer Hochschulpolitik Ehrungen Emil Abderhalden Schriften und Werke Literatur Weblinks Einzelnachweise Biografie Emil Abderhalden war der Sohn eines Volksschullehrers und studierte ab 1895 Medizin an der Universität Basel, wo er 1901 sein Studium mit dem Staatsexamen abschloss und 1902 zum Dr. med. promoviert wurde. Sein Doktorvater Gustav von Bunge prägte ihn sowohl in wissenschaftlicher als auch in sozialer Hinsicht und vermittelte ihn, trotz wissenschaftlicher Differenzen, 1902 als Assistenten zum späteren Nobelpreisträger Emil Fischer an die Universität Berlin, wo sich Abderhalden 1904 bei Wilhelm Engelmann habilitierte.[1] Ab 1908 war Abderhalden Professor für Physiologie an der Tierärztlichen Hochschule Berlin. Im selben Jahr noch betraute man ihn mit der Leitung des Physiologischen Instituts der Hochschule. 1911 bis 1945 lehrte Abderhalden physiologische Chemie und Physiologie an der Universität Halle.[2] 1912 wurde er zum Mitglied der Gelehrtenakademie Leopoldina gewählt.[3] Im Jahr 1914 erhielt er die Cothenius-Medaille der Leopoldina.