DOCSLIB.ORG

REPLACING the WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT How to Ensure the UK Takes Back Control on Exiting the Transition Period

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPLACING the WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT How to Ensure the UK Takes Back Control on Exiting the Transition Period REPLACING THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT How to ensure the UK takes back control on exiting the transition period JULY 2020 A Forewords 8 The History of Sovereignty - Professor Robert Tombs 8 Reasserting our Sovereignty: A Practical Necessity - Sir Bill Cash MP 10 Sovereignty in the Context of Northern Ireland - The Rt Hon The Lord Trimble, PC 13 Introduction 16 STEP ONE - OBTAIN A GOVERNMENT CONSENSUS THAT WA/PD THREATS TO UK SOVEREIGNTY ARE UNACCEPTABLE 18 A - Threats in the Northern Ireland Protocol 19 B - Threats in Remainder of the WA 29 C - Threats Arising from Negotiations 40 D - Threats to Defence in the PD 51 STEP TWO - DEFINE A SOVEREIGNTY COMPLIANT AGREEMENT 55 An Invisible Border - Alternative Arrangements/Mutual Enforcement 55 Rights of EU Citizens to be Protected by UK National Legislation 62 Independent Adjudication for Agreed Outcomes 63 Transitioning Back to UK Court Remedies 63 Exit from EIB - and Other Residual Liabilities 63 No Legal Requirement to Cooperate/Share Resources with EU Defence Schemes 66 STEP THREE - REPLACE THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT WITH AN ACCEPTABLE AGREEMENT 67 The Legal Logic 68 The Legal Approach Required 75 STEP FOUR - BENEFIT FROM ANY OUTCOME 76 Agreement With The EU 76 No Agreement 82 STEP FIVE - OFFER THE RIGHT DEAL 87 Annex A - Amount at Risk Under the Commitment Appropriation 88 Annex B - Demystifying the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy 90 Annex C - Overview of How Standard Customs and Border Procedure Operate in the EU 93 Annex D - Draft FTA Text on Subsidy Control 97 B THE CENTRE FOR BREXIT POLICY The Centre for Brexit Policy (CBP) is a new think tank backed by cross-party politicians who support the UK leaving the EU. It has been formed to propose the critical policy changes enabled by Brexit that will boost national prosperity and well-being in years to come, as well as help ensure that Britain fully ‘takes back control’ when it leaves the European Union. The CBP aspires to trigger a deep and wide debate about what Brexit should mean for the UK over the next decade or two. By providing a focus for the development of post-Brexit public policy, the CBP hopes to help formulate an overarching framework for the UK that maximises the opportunities Brexit affords. This will be promoted to Government, Parliamentarians, and the public welcoming contributions from those who want to see Brexit open a new and fruitful chapter in our country’s life. The CBP has three core objectives: • Identify the benefits and opportunities of Brexit across the full spectrum of economic, trade, social, foreign, defence and security policy areas proposing new policies for the Government’s agenda • Continue to make the intellectual, evidence-based case for a ‘real’ Brexit and provide the Government with clear and constructive advice on how to deal with ongoing negotiation and implementation issues. A ‘real’ Brexit means regaining full control over our laws, borders, seas, trade, and courts • Check any attempts to dilute a real Brexit, as well as serving as a catalyst and rallying point for positive news stories that, over time, will be able to persuade and demonstrate the many substantial advantages of Brexit Delivery of these objectives is based on professional, substantive fact-based research by experts in their fields leading to authoritative reports, short papers, OpEds, events, and briefing meetings - both within and without Government. The CBP is supported by a cadre of expert CBP Fellows drawn from multiple disciplines to provide additional expertise and experience in developing an agenda for policy change that will ensure the British people benefit from Brexit. Additional support is provided by a CBP Business Forum to bring a business perspective to shaping CBP’s agenda, provide input to policy proposals, and deliver a pro-Brexit business voice. 1 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS David Banks Co-Founder, Veterans for Britain Bill Cash MP for Stone; Chairman, European Scrutiny Committee; former Shadow Attorney General/Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs David Collins Professor of International Economic Law City, University of London Martin Howe QC (Intellectual Property and EU Law); Chairman Lawyers for Britain Robert Lyddon Principal, Lyddon Consulting Services Hans Maessen Independent Customs Adviser for business and government; Member, Alternative Arrangements Commission Edgar Miller Managing Director, Palladian Limited; Convener, Economists for Free Trade; Senior Visiting Fellow, Cass Business School Owen Paterson MP for North Shropshire; former Secretary of State for Northern Ireland; former Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Barnabas Reynolds Partner, Shearman & Sterling, Global Head of Financial Institutions Lee Rotherham Director, The Red Cell; Executive Director, Veterans for Britain; former Director of Special Projects, Vote Leave Robert Tombs Professor Emeritus of French History, University of Cambridge; Fellow, St John’s College; Co-Editor, Briefings for Brexit Lord Trimble Former First Minister of Northern Ireland; Nobel Peace Prize for work leading to the Good Friday Agreement James Webber Partner, Shearman & Sterling (Brussels and London) specialising in EU and UK antitrust law Sammy Wilson MP for East Antrim; Minister of Finance and Personnel and Minister of the Environment, Northern Ireland Executive; former Lord Mayor of Belfast 2 “But if we are to be told by a foreign Power... what we shall do, and what we shall not do, we have Independence yet to seek, & have contended hitherto for very little.” George Washington letter to Alexander Hamilton, 8th May 17961 1 Full speech available at: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/99-01-02-00497 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • As the Government recognises, Sovereignty is the crux of Brexit. Chief Negotiator, David Frost, has said, it is not “some clever tactical position” but the “point of the whole project”. – The bargain the UK struck when entering into the EEC/EU was, in return for shared sovereignty, it would gain other advantages. The British public voted in the 2016 Referendum and subsequently in other national elections that those advantages are no longer worth it - a rejection of the EU’s concept of “pooled sovereignty” – Therefore, on exiting the Transition Period (TP), it is vital that the Government ensures that no legal text interferes with the UK returning to a fully sovereign state, consistent with the status quo ante for whatever reasons the EU may concoct • As things currently stand, this is not the case. The current situation results from a failure in the original Withdrawal Agreement (WA) - negotiated by Theresa May - to appreciate the irreconcilable position of exiting the EU, but instead signing back into EU law without any voting power over that law. Given the time and political constrains of a year ago, the new Conservative Government was surprisingly successful in eliminating the Irish Backstop and facilitating an official exit from the EU in January of this year on the basis of transition to a fully sovereign state. – However, although the Government sees the revised Withdrawal Agreement (WA) as only transitional until the end of the TP in December, there remain serious threats to UK sovereignty that will have crippling economic and strategic consequences for years to come if they are not dealt with now – Exiting the TP with these threats still in place will not return the UK to a fully sovereign state and is unacceptable • It is not widely understood how serious these threats are or that they can be eliminated. – The WA amounts to a ‘poison pill’, leaving the UK subjugated to the EU. There are specific terms in the Northern Ireland Protocol (the Protocol), as well as in other parts of the WA, giving power to the EU and encroaching on UK sovereignty with regard to State aid, EU citizens’ rights, ‘divorce payment’ liabilities, future financial liabilities, EU data protection laws, EU geographical indications of origin, provisions relating to UK sovereign bases in Cyprus and Gibraltar, as well as numerous other matters – Separately, in the negotiations, the EU is demanding additional sovereignty renunciations with regard to fishing rights and demands for a ‘level playing field’ – The Political Declaration (PD) invites the UK to participate in various defence and industry schemes that would undercut our future independence and freedom of manoeuvre • To fulfil Brexit’s sovereign promise and take back control from the EU, the UK must ensure that any agreement negotiated is ‘sovereignty compliant’ and that the UK prepares itself for the possibility that the EU ultimately will not come to such an agreement. This requires the Government to take the following five steps: 1. Obtain a Government consensus that the WA/PD threats to UK sovereignty and in the negotiations at large are unacceptable 2. Define a Sovereignty Compliant Agreement to replace the WA 3. Replace the WA through negotiation by a new Sovereignty Compliant Agreement, explaining and justifying why the UK’s proposed agreement meets the EU’s objectives while simultaneously ensuring the UK’s future sovereignty 4. Position the UK to benefit from whatever negotiation outcome is achieved 5. Offer the right deal to the EU 4 These steps provide a blueprint that - if implemented well - could produce an outcome of mutual benefit to both the UK and the EU. STEP ONE - OBTAIN A GOVERNMENT CONSENSUS THAT WA/PD THREATS TO UK SOVEREIGNTY ARE UNACCEPTABLE. Given the raft of problems currently confronting the Government, it has understandably been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Irish Society in the Wake of Brexit
    Northern Irish Society in the Wake of Brexit By Agnès Maillot Since the 2016 referendum, Brexit has dominated the political conversation in Northern Ireland, launching a debate on the Irish reunification and exacerbating communitarian tensions within Northern Irish society. What are the social and economic roots of these conflicts, and what is at stake for Northern Ireland’s future? “No Irish sea border”, “EU out of Ulster”, “NI Protocol makes GFA null and void”. These are some of the graffiti that have appeared on the walls of some Northern Irish communities in recent weeks. They all express Loyalist1 frustration, and sometimes anger, towards the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement reached in 2019 between the UK and the EU, which includes a specific section on Northern Ireland.2 While the message behind these phrases might seem cryptic to the outsider, it is a language that most of the Irish, and more specifically Northern Irish, can speak fluently. For the last four years, Brexit has regularly been making the news headlines and has dominated political conversations. More importantly, it has introduced a new dimension in the way in which the future of the UK province is discussed, prompting a debate on the reunification of the island and exacerbating a crisis within Unionism. Brexit has destabilised the Unionist community, whose sense of identity had already been tested over the last twenty years by the Peace process, by the 1 In Northern Ireland, the two main political families are Unionism (those bent on maintaining the Union with the2 The UK) withdrawal and Nationalis agreementm, wh wasich reached strives into Octoberachieve 2019a United and subsequentlyIreland.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Transition and Northern Ireland: a Reading List
    Research and Information Service Briefing Paper Paper 31/20 31 December 2020 NIAR 182-2020 Compiled by Seán McGeown Brexit Transition and Northern Ireland: A Reading List Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly NIAR 92-17 Briefing Paper Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GOVERNMENTS United Kingdom Government Government of Ireland Northern Ireland Executive Welsh Government Scottish Government 3. LEGISLATURES Westminster Parliament Houses of the Oireachtas/Tithe an Oireachtas Northern Ireland Assembly Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament Scottish Parliament 4. EU INSTITUTIONS European Council and Council of the European Union European Commission European Parliament 5. COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS Brexit Institute (Dublin City University) Briefings for Britain (formerly Briefings for Brexit) British Irish Chamber of Commerce Brookings Institution Carnegie Europe Centre for Brexit Policy Centre for Brexit Studies (University of Birmingham) Centre for Cross Border Studies Centre for European Reform Centre on Constitutional Change Committee
    [Show full text]
  • THE BORDER INTO BREXIT: Perspectives from Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland Executive Summary
    THE BORDER INTO BREXIT: Perspectives from Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland Executive Summary B 3 B 3 O 1 R 1 D 2 E 1 R 1 E 1 X 8 I 1 N 1 T 1 O 1 T 1 Contents Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................... 5 Foreword ............................................................................................................. 6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 10 The project .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Impact of Brexit ............................................................................................................................................ 10 A hard border .................................................................................................................................................11 Leave supporters in the border region ................................................................................................ 12 A No Deal Brexit .......................................................................................................................................... 12 The Revised Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreement .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Report
    HOUSE OF LORDS European Affairs Committee 2nd Report of Session 2021-22 Report from the Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland: Introductory report Ordered to be printed 21 July 2021 and published 29 July 2021 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 55 The European Affairs Committee and the Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland The European Affairs Committee was appointed to consider matters relating to the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union and the European Economic Area, including the implementation and governance structures of any agreements between the United Kingdom and the European Union; to consider European Union documents deposited in the House by a minister; and to support the House as appropriate in interparliamentary cooperation with the European Parliament and the Member States of the European Union. The Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland was appointed by the European Affairs Committee to consider all matters related to the Protocol, including scrutiny of: EU legislation within the scope of the Protocol; relevant domestic UK legislation and policy; the Northern Ireland-related work of the governance bodies established under the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement; the Protocol’s political and socio-economic impact on Northern Ireland; and its impact on UK-Irish bilateral relations; as well as conducting interparliamentary dialogue, including with the Northern Ireland Assembly and Irish Oireachtas. Membership The Members of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Law+In+Society+2020+Crisis+Compressed.Pdf
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to everyone who made the production and publication of the 2020 Sydney University Law Society Law in Society Journal possible. In particular, we would like to thank the Sydney Law School and the University of Sydney Union for their continued support of SULS and its publications. We acknowledge the traditional Aboriginal owners of the land that the University of Sydney is built upon, the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation. We acknowledge that this was and always will be Aboriginal Land and are proud to be on the lands of one of the oldest surviving cultures in existence. We respect the knowledge that traditional elders and Aboriginal people hold and pass on from generation to generation, and acknowledge the continuous fight for constitutional reform and treaty recognition to this day. We regret that white supremacy has been used to justify Indigenous dispossession, colonial rule and violence in the past, in particular, a legal and political system that still to this date doesn’t provide Aboriginal people with justice. EDITORS Editorial Team: Zachary O’Meara (Editor-in-Chief), Alexander Bird, Annie Chen, Alexander MacIntyre, Vanessa Li Publications Director: Alison Chen Design Director: Daniel Lee Aniceto Design Team: Justine Hu, Arasa Hardie, Gemma Wu, Michelle Chen and Shaily Shrestha SULS Office Monday to Thursday 10am-2pm Tuesday extended hours 10am-6pm Room 103 New Law Building Annex F10 University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2006 Phone (02) 9352 0204 Website www.suls.org.au Facebook @SydneyUniversityLawSociety Instagram @suls_sydney All contents © Sydney University Law Society Incorporated 2020 All references to ‘Sydney University Law Society’ or ‘SULS’ refers to Sydney University Law Society Inc., an incorporated charitable association registered in the state of New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland
    Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46730 SUMMARY R46730 Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 The United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020. Under the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the two sides, the UK continued to apply EU rules Derek E. Mix, Coordinator during a transition period lasting to the end of 2020. In December 2020, UK and EU negotiators Specialist in European concluded a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) that sets out terms of the future Affairs relationship, including on trade, economic relations, and cooperation on a range of other issues. The agreement left numerous questions and issues unresolved, however, meaning many aspects of the UK-EU relationship may evolve over time and through subsequent negotiations. Shayerah I. Akhtar Specialist in International Trade and Finance Trade and Economic Impacts After the transition period, the UK left the EU customs union and regained the ability to pursue Kristin Archick an independent national trade policy. The TCA avoids the severe disruption to UK-EU trade that Specialist in European many feared with a hard Brexit on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms but does not replicate Affairs the far more frictionless trading that occurs in the EU single market. Analysts predict the disruption resulting from Brexit and the adjustment to the new UK-EU trading relationship under the TCA may have a negative economic impact on the UK, at least in the near term; many businesses in the UK have been taking steps to mitigate potential economic losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland
    Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46730 SUMMARY R46730 Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 The United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020. Under the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the two sides, the UK continued to apply EU rules Derek E. Mix, Coordinator during a transition period lasting to the end of 2020. In December 2020, UK and EU negotiators Specialist in European concluded a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) that sets out terms of the future Affairs relationship, including on trade, economic relations, and cooperation on a range of other issues. The agreement left numerous questions and issues unresolved, however, meaning many aspects of the UK-EU relationship may evolve over time and through subsequent negotiations. Shayerah I. Akhtar Specialist in International Trade and Finance Trade and Economic Impacts After the transition period, the UK left the EU customs union and regained the ability to pursue Kristin Archick an independent national trade policy. The TCA avoids the severe disruption to UK-EU trade that Specialist in European many feared with a hard Brexit on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms but does not replicate Affairs the far more frictionless trading that occurs in the EU single market. Analysts predict the disruption resulting from Brexit and the adjustment to the new UK-EU trading relationship under the TCA may have a negative economic impact on the UK, at least in the near term; many businesses in the UK have been taking steps to mitigate potential economic losses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tenerife Property & Business Guide
    The Tenerife Property Part of the Spanish Property Guides Group January 2019 & Business Guide Issue 171 Tel: 922 703 725 Email: [email protected] www.thetenerifepropertyguide.com Happy New Year! Everyone at The Tenerife Property Guide would like to wish all readers and clients, past and present, a Happy, Healthy, and Prosperous 2019! LAS CHAFIRAS Finding businesses for people like you! Tenerife 89.5, 89.8 & 93.7 FM See our main advert BOOK SHOP broadcasting from on page 63 Open Monday - Friday 9.00am – 5.00pm Masca to Arico Call us now on 653 593 231 Or By Appointment when it's on, it's on! or 693 816 888 to discuss( the sale of your business. Www.poweronfm.com See Page 50 for more information Professional upholstery 2 Residential Property Sales January 2019 - Issue 171 · The Tenerife Property & Business Guide Contents: 02 Get your FREE Property Report! FREE PROPERTY 03/34 Residential Sales 22 Buying or Selling? - Team up with the Experts! Tenerife island Rentals/BUY Tenerife REPORT! 28 Tenerife South Real Estate Association If you’re curious about 34 Direct from Owner – Lovely house in Abades! how much your property 35 Currencies Direct for all your currency transfer needs may be worth in Los Cristianos, here’s 36 Thinking of freshening up your Home – Look NO an easy way to find out! FURTHER than Studio4Decor in Los Abrigos 36 Energy Performance Certificates – January update Our FREE Report outlines what property 37 The Prestige Group – Outdoor Furniture SALE – prices have been doing STARTS January 2019! during 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Updated Brit Ref
    Britain’s Referendum Decision and its Effects by Stephen Bush Technomica First Published 2016 by Technomica* © Professor Stephen Bush 2016 The right of Stephen Bush to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. ISBN 9 780993 110894 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. This book may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form, binding or cover other than that in which it is published without the prior consent of the publishers. *The publishing imprint of Prosyma Research Ltd, Unit 4b, Boldero Road, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7BS Printed in Great Britain by Gipping Press Ltd Units 1 & 2 Lion Barn Industrial Estate, Needham Market, Suffolk, IP6 8NZ Dedication This book is dedicated to my dear wife Gill, without whose unstinting support and IT skills it simply could not have been done. Preface Preface The Decision At the Referendum on June 23 rd , the choice facing the British people is to decide between two alternative systems of governing their country. In one alternative, the democratically elected British Parliament at Westminster becomes again the supreme source of law and government in Britain in all matters, as it was up to 1973. To opt for this alternative will require voting on June 23 rd to “Leave” the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 687 13 January 2021 No. 159 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 13 January 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 275 13 JANUARY 2021 276 are working across Government and particularly with House of Commons the Department for Education to develop a new impactful all-age autism strategy. This will set out specific actions Wednesday 13 January 2021 to address the significant inequalities that autistic people and their families face. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock We aim to publish the strategy in the spring. PRAYERS Kerry McCarthy [V]: I was not really able to hear the Minister’s answer, but there was a report from the Care Quality Commission in October last year that was quite [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] damning in its account of the experiences of people Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Orders, with autism and learning disabilities in mental health 4 June and 30 December 2020). facilities. What work is the Minister doing—particularly [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] in terms of the review of the Mental Health Act 2010 that we will hear about later today—to ensure that people with autism are treated sensitively when they end Oral Answers to Questions up encountering mental health services and having to spend time as an in-patient? WOMEN AND EQUALITIES Helen Whately: I know that the report to which the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to everyone who made the production and publication of the 2020 Sydney University Law Society Law in Society Journal possible. In particular, we would like to thank the Sydney Law School and the University of Sydney Union for their continued support of SULS and its publications. We acknowledge the traditional Aboriginal owners of the land that the University of Sydney is built upon, the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation. We acknowledge that this was and always will be Aboriginal Land and are proud to be on the lands of one of the oldest surviving cultures in existence. We respect the knowledge that traditional elders and Aboriginal people hold and pass on from generation to generation, and acknowledge the continuous fight for constitutional reform and treaty recognition to this day. We regret that white supremacy has been used to justify Indigenous dispossession, colonial rule and violence in the past, in particular, a legal and political system that still to this date doesn’t provide Aboriginal people with justice. EDITORS Editorial Team: Zachary O’Meara (Editor-in-Chief), Alexander Bird, Annie Chen, Alexander MacIntyre, Vanessa Li Publications Director: Alison Chen Design Director: Daniel Lee Aniceto Design Team: Justine Hu, Arasa Hardie, Gemma Wu, Michelle Chen and Shaily Shrestha SULS Office Monday to Thursday 10am-2pm Tuesday extended hours 10am-6pm Room 103 New Law Building Annex F10 University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2006 Phone (02) 9352 0204 Website www.suls.org.au Facebook @SydneyUniversityLawSociety Instagram @suls_sydney All contents © Sydney University Law Society Incorporated 2020 All references to ‘Sydney University Law Society’ or ‘SULS’ refers to Sydney University Law Society Inc., an incorporated charitable association registered in the state of New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Outcomes and Northern Ireland: a Reading List
    Research and Information Service Briefing Paper Paper 05/21 29 July 2021 NIAR 38-2021 Compiled by Seán McGeown Brexit Outcomes and Northern Ireland: A Reading List Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly NIAR 38-2021 Briefing Paper Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GOVERNMENTS United Kingdom Government Government of Ireland Northern Ireland Executive Scottish Government 3. LEGISLATURES Westminster Parliament Houses of the Oireachtas/Tithe an Oireachtas Northern Ireland Assembly Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament Scottish Parliament 4. EU INSTITUTIONS European Council and Council of the European Union European Commission European Parliament 5. COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS Brexit Institute (Dublin City University) British Irish Chamber of Commerce Carnegie Europe Centre for Brexit Policy Centre for Brexit Studies (University of Birmingham) Centre for Cross Border Studies Centre for European Reform Committee on the Administration of Justice Congressional Research Service Constitution Unit – University College London Consumer Council
    [Show full text]