Regnier De Graaf (1641-1673) [1]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biology of the Corpus Luteum
PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 113, No 1, 43–49, 2011 CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362 Review Biology of the Corpus luteum Abstract JELENA TOMAC \UR\ICA CEKINOVI] Corpus luteum (CL) is a small, transient endocrine gland formed fol- JURICA ARAPOVI] lowing ovulation from the secretory cells of the ovarian follicles. The main function of CL is the production of progesterone, a hormone which regu- Department of Histology and Embryology lates various reproductive functions. Progesterone plays a key role in the reg- Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka B. Branchetta 20, Rijeka, Croatia ulation of the length of estrous cycle and in the implantation of the blastocysts. Preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) is crucial for Correspondence: the luteinization of follicular cells and CL maintenance, but there are also Jelena Tomac other factors which support the CL development and its functioning. In the Department of Histology and Embryology Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka absence of pregnancy, CL will cease to produce progesterone and induce it- B. Branchetta 20, Rijeka, Croatia self degradation known as luteolysis. This review is designed to provide a E-mail: [email protected] short overview of the events during the life span of corpus luteum (CL) and to make an insight in the synthesis and secretion of its main product – pro- Key words: Ovary, Corpus Luteum, gesterone. The major biologic mechanisms involved in CL development, Progesterone, Luteinization, Luteolysis function, and regression will also be discussed. INTRODUCTION orpus luteum (CL) is a transient endocrine gland, established by Cresidual follicular wall cells (granulosa and theca cells) following ovulation. -
The Legacy of Reinier De Graaf
A Portrait in History The Legacy of Reinier De Graaf Venita Jay, MD, FRCPC n the second half of the 17th century, a young Dutch I physician and anatomist left a lasting legacy in medi- cine. Reinier (also spelled Regner and Regnier) de Graaf (1641±1673), in a short but extremely productive life, made remarkable contributions to medicine. He unraveled the mysteries of the human reproductive system, and his name remains irrevocably associated with the ovarian fol- licle. De Graaf was born in Schoonhaven, Holland. After studying in Utrecht, Holland, De Graaf started at the fa- mous Leiden University. As a student, De Graaf helped Johannes van Horne in the preparation of anatomical spec- imens. He became known for using a syringe to inject liquids and wax into blood vessels. At Leiden, he also studied under the legendary Franciscus Sylvius. De Graaf became a pioneer in the study of the pancreas and its secretions. In 1664, De Graaf published his work, De Succi Pancreatici Natura et Usu Exercitatio Anatomica Med- ica, which discussed his work on pancreatic juices, saliva, and bile. In this work, he described the method of col- lecting pancreatic secretions through a temporary pancre- atic ®stula by introducing a cannula into the pancreatic duct in a live dog. De Graaf also used an arti®cial biliary ®stula to collect bile. In 1665, De Graaf went to France and continued his anatomical research on the pancreas. In July of 1665, he received his doctorate in medicine with honors from the University of Angers, France. De Graaf then returned to the Netherlands, where it was anticipated that he would succeed Sylvius at Leiden University. -
Terme Éponyme
Monin, Sylvie. 1996 « Termes éponymes en médecine et application pédagogique ». ASp 11-14 Annexe Exercices d’application Exercice N°1 Après avoir rappelé les définitions des concepts « terme éponyme » et « toponyme », demander à l’apprenant de lire dans un premier temps la liste d’appellations éponymes proposée ; puis, lui demander de les classer selon les catégories suivantes : - patronyme de savant - héros mythologique - toponyme - nom de malade - héros de roman - profession - personnage biblique - Bartholin's glands - Mariotte's spot - whartonitis - nabothian cysts - fallopian tube - bundle of HIS - Achilles tendon - Australia gene - Christmas factor - Lyme arthritis - Cowden's disease - daltonism - Oedipus complex - Electra complex - Jocasta complex - narcissisism - onanism - sodomy - bovarism - gauze - morphine - Braille alphabet - malpighian pyramid - Adam’s apple - SAINT VITUS' dance - Malta fever - siamese twins - syphilis - shoemakers' cramp - legionnaires’ disease Exercice N°2 Dans cette liste de termes éponymes, repérer les intrus. - Golgi apparatus - cowperitis - neurinoma - Hottentot apron - Oddi’s sphincter - MacBurney’s point - cesarotomy - Laennec’s cirrhosis - kwashiorkor - Down's syndrome - Marbury virus disease - Parkinson’s disease - APGAR's test - B.C.G. - Giemsa’s stain Exercice N°3 Entourer la bonne réponse et retrouver l'appellation éponyme. 1 - Charles Mantoux discovered a - a manometer b- a syndrome c- a reaction or a test 2 - Richard May, Ludwig Grünwald and Gustav Giemsa discovered a - a diverticulum b - a -
And Pancreas Divisum
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.27.2.203 on 1 February 1986. Downloaded from Gut 1986, 27, 203-212 Progress report A historical perspective on the discovery of the accessory duct of the pancreas, the ampulla 'of Vater' andpancreas divisum SUMMARY The discovery of the accessory duct of the pancreas is usually ascribed to Giovanni Domenico Santorini (1681-1737), after whom this structure is named. The papilla duodeni (ampulla 'of Vater', or papilla 'of Santorini') is named after Abraham Vater (1684-1751) or after GD Santorini. Pancreas divisum, a persistence through non-fusion of the embryonic dorsal and ventral pancreas is a relatively common clinical condition, the discovery of which is usually ascribed to Joseph Hyrtl (1810-1894). In this review I report that pancreas divisum, the accessory duct and the papilla duodeni (ampulla 'of Vater') had all been observed and the observations published during the 17th century by at least seven anatomists before Santorini, Vater, and Hyrtl. I further suggest, in the light of frequent anatomical misattributions in common usage, that anatomical structures be referred to only by their proper anatomical names. The human pancreas forms during the seventh week of embryonic http://gut.bmj.com/ development by the fusion of two pancreatic primordia, one dorsal and the other ventral.1 4Each of these two primordia contains a duct, opening into the duodenum. After fusion, the distal part of the main duct of the pancreas ('Wirsung's duct') is formed from the duct of the ventral pancreas, and its proximal part from the proximal portion of the duct of the dorsal primordium. -
Physiology of the Graafian Follicle and Ovulation
Physiology of the Graafian Follicle and Ovulation R.H.F. HUNTER formerly Department of Clinical Studies – Reproduction Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen currently Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Cambridge Madingley Road Cambridge PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OFTHE UNIVERSITY OFCAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C R.H.F. Hunter 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Times 10/13 pt System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 521 78198 1 hardback Every effort has been made in preparing this book to provide accurate and up-to-date information which is in accord with accepted standards and practice at the time of publication. Nevertheless, the author and publisher can make no warranties that the information contained herein is totally free from error, not least because clinical standards are constantly changing through research and regulation. The author and publisher therefore disclaim all liability for direct or consequential damages resulting from the use of material contained in this book. -
The Following Four Pages Are the Professional Genealogy Of
The following four pages are the professional genealogy of Professor Steven H. Strauss, Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 1982 2002 • Professor of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry (CSU) • Studied iron hydroporphyrins, Steven H. Strauss fluorinated superweak anions, nonclassical metal carbonyls, PhD Northwestern 1979 halofullerenes, and detection & extraction of aqueous anions • CSU Research Foundation • Professor of Inorganic Chemistry Researcher of the Year 2002 (NorthwesternU) • Author of Manipulation of Air-Sensitive Compounds Duward F. Shriver • Co-author of textbook PhD Michigan 1962 Inorganic Chemistry • ACS Award for Distinguished Service in Inorg. Chem.1987 • Professor of Inorganic Chemistry (UMich and UUtah) Robert W. Parry • ACS Award for Distinguished Service in Inorg. Chem. 1965 PhD Illinois 1947 • ACS Award in Chemical Education 1977 • ACS Priestley Medal 1993 • Professor of Inorg. Chem. (UIll.) • The "Father" of American coordination chemistry • ACS President 1957 John C. Bailar • ACS Award in Chem. Educ. 1961 PhD Michigan 1928 • ACS Award for Distinguished Service in Inorg. Chem. 1972 • ACS Priestley Medal 1964 • Professor of Chemistry (UMich) • Synthesis of CPh4 in Meyer's lab • First isolation of an organic free Moses Gomberg radical (CPh3•) in Meyer's lab PhD Michigan 1894 • The "Father" of organic free radical chemistry • Developed the first satisfactory • Professor of Organic Chemistry antifreeze and Pharmacy (UMich) • Founded qualitative org. analysis • Studied alkaloid toxicology (esp. Alfred B. Prescott alkaloidal periodides) and the MD Michigan 1864 structure of caffeine • Developed the first assay for opium • Established chemistry lab at UMich (Houghton's assistant) • Took over Houghton's chemistry Silas H. Douglass duties in 1845 MD Maryland 1842 • Co-authored (with A. -
The Cerebral Cortex, Also Known As the Cerebral Mantle, Is the Outer Layer of Neural Tissue of the Cerebrum of the Brain in Humans and Other Mammals
BRAIN about my country Korea, about Franciscus Sylvius 10602a Medicine LEE HAM K-pop is a genre of popular music originating in South Korea. It is influenced by styles and genres from around the world, such as experimental, rock, jazz, gospel, hip hop, R&B, reggae, electronic K-POP dance, folk, country, and classical on top of its traditional Korean music roots. Their experimentation with different styles and genres of music and integration of foreign musical elements helped reshape and modernize South Korea's contemporary music scene. Franciscus Sylvius Sylvius" redirects here For the alternate spelling of the word, see Silvius Franciscus Sylvius 15 March 1614 – 19 November 1672), born Franz de le Boë a Dutch physician and scientist (chemist, physiologist and anatomist) champion of Descartes', Van Helmont's and William Harvey's work and theories He was one of the earliest defenders of the theory of circulation of the blood in the Netherlands, and commonly falsely cited as the inventor of gin – others pin point the origin of gin to Italy In 1669 Sylvius founded the first academic chemical laboratory. Biology of Leiden University the Sylvius Laboratory. -Famous students : Jan Swammerdam, Reinier de Graaf, Niels Stensen and Burchard de Volder. He founded the Iatrochemical School of Medicine -which all life and disease processes are based on chemical actions introduced the concept of chemical affinity as a way to understand the way the human body uses salts and contributed greatly to the understanding of digestion and of bodily fluid. published: -
P1.3 Chemical Genealogy of an Atmospheric Chemist: James N. Pitts, Jr., a Case Study
P1.3 CHEMICAL GENEALOGY OF AN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST: JAMES N. PITTS, JR., A CASE STUDY Jeffrey S. Gaffney* and Nancy A. Marley Environmental Research Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 1. INTRODUCTION It is indeed a desirable thing to be well descended, but Pitts’ group researched the basic chemistry and the glory belongs to our ancestors. kinetics of gas-phase reactions involved in air pollution - Plutarch (AD 46?-120) and developed methods for studying and detecting these species. As director of the Statewide Air Pollution Plutarch makes an interesting point. It is important to Research Center at the University of California, understand our background and where we came from if Riverside, he led the development of smog chamber we are to really understand the process of creative construction and studies on the fundamental processes effort. Mentoring is a key aspect of atmospheric and production rates of ozone and other oxidants. His chemistry. Our thesis mentors and colleagues have early work focused on singlet-oxygen chemistry, while major influence on us and our research through their his later work addressed the presence and formation of discussions and work during the periods in our careers mutagens in aerosols found in photochemical smog. when we study with them. Here, I explore his mentors and search for links and similar interests in atmospheric chemistry, analytical How far back does this mentoring influence trace? technique development, physical organic chemistry, and Our mentors influence us, but they were impacted by fundamental processes in biological toxicology. their mentors, and so on. Presented here is a chemical genealogy of a well-known atmospheric chemist and mentor (thesis mentor for J. -
The Female Prostate: the Newly Recognized Organ of the Female Genitourinary System
The Female Prostate: The Newly Recognized Organ of the Female Genitourinary System Biól. Alberto Rubio-Casillas, and Mtro. César Manuel Rodríguez-Quintero Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. 2009. Abstract The existence of the human female prostate had been a controversial topic in modern urological medicine, frequently ignored, or thought it was a vestigial organ, however, today this perception is antiquated; recent investigations recognize it as a functional gland capable of performing the same functions as the male prostate gland. In 1672, the Dutch anatomist Regnier de Graaf presented the first anatomical description of the female prostate. He was also the first to use this term. He described it as “a collection of functional glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra. Fortunately, the controversy has ended after more than 300 years, due largely to the substantial work that for over 25 years has made Dr. Milan Zaviacic. The Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology (FICAT) in its 2001 meeting in Orlando, Florida, USA, agreed to include the term female prostate in the next edition of Histological Terminology, prohibiting the use of terms gland or para-urethral ducts, and Skene's gland to appoint the prostate in women. In pathology, there are reported cases of female prostate cancer, which although very rare, indicate that the female prostate may also develop cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. This article tries to motivate gynecologists, urologists and uro-gynecologists to reevaluate the diagnostic criteria around diseases like the female urethral syndrome, because the evidence suggests it may actually be cases of prostatitis. Antecedents The existence of the human female prostate had been a controversial topic in modern urological medicine, frequently ignored, or thought it was a vestigial organ. -
Burchard De Volder's Experimenta Philosophica Naturalia (1676–1677)
Appendix: Burchard de Volder’s Experimenta philosophica naturalia (1676–1677) [78r] Experimenta philosophica naturalia, auctore M[a]gis[tro] De Valdo Lugd[uni] ann[o] 1676.1 1um 12 Martii His subject was the ponderosity, or rather the compression of the air over us, which he had proved by some other experiments before now. Yet to assert it more authentically, and to give the auditory to understand that it was not the metus vacuii2 which did make nature to work so violently, and potent in many operations, but rather the compression of the air itself, he used the following demonstration. First he had made two little cylinders of white stone perfectly round, and perfectly plane on the superficies, where they were to touch one [78v] another, and as perfectly equal to each other as he could get them made. Their diameter was <about> \just/ two inches and ⅓d each, and the depth, <mi> or length, might be a little more Next he joined these two cylinders together with a little tallow, and no other artifice, and so close that not the least atom of air could get in betwixt them: and this he said he did least any might calumniat3 that the superficies were not perfectly plain and conse- quently some air must be got in betwixt them, for at least, quoth he, those very little 1 Conventions adopted in the transcription: (1) the text deleted in the manuscript has been put between brackets thus < >; whenever possible, I have provided the deleted text; otherwise, I have used dots instead of the illegible letters; (2) the text in the margin or between the lines is put between the symbols \ /; (3) doubtful text is put between brackets { }; whenever possible, I have provided the text, otherwise, I have used dots instead of the illegible letters; (4) my additions are put between brackets [ ]; (5) the text has been modernized, i.e. -
The Letters of Burchard De Volder to Philipp Van Limborch
THE LETTERS OF BURCHARD DE VOLDER TO PHILIPP VAN LIMBORCH ANDREA STRAZZONI In these notes I provide the transcription and annotated edition of the only four extant letters of the Dutch Cartesian-inspired philosopher and mathem- atician Burchard de Volder (1643–1709), professor at Leiden from 1670 to 1705, to the Remonstrant theologian Philipp van Limborch (1633–1712), pro- fessor of theology in the Amsterdam Remonstrant seminary from 1668 to 1712. As the reader can find detailed reconstructions both of De Volder’s and Van Limborch’s lives and intellectual paths in a variety of secondary sources,1 it is enough to give here some insights into their direct connections only, be- fore turning to the correspondence itself. Burchard de Volder, born in Amsterdam in 1643 son of Joost de Volder, Mennonite landscape painter and translator of Hugo Grotius’s De veritate reli- gionis Christianae (1627) into Dutch,2 received his master’s degree at Utrecht in 1660 (under Johannes de Bruyn), and his medical doctorate at Leiden on 3 1 As to De Volder, see KLEVER 1988; WIESENFELDT 2002, 54–64, 99–132; WIESENFELDT 2003; LODGE 2005; NYDEN 2013; NYDEN 2014; VAN BUNGE 2013; VAN BUNGE 2017. As to Van Limborch, see BARNOUW 1963; SIMONUTTI 1984; SIMONUTTI 1990; SIMONUTTI 2002; HICKS 1985; VAN ROODEN, WESSELIUS 1987; DE SCHEPPER 1993; VAN BUNGE 2003; LANDUCCI 2015; DAUGIRDAS 2017. 2 Cf. GROTIUS 1653. On Joost de Volder, see BECK 1972–1991, volume 4, 422–427; WELLER 2009, 216–219; LAMBOUR 2012. 268 Noctua, anno V, n. 2, 2018, ISSN 2284-1180 July 1664 (under Franciscus Sylvius). -
De Felici1371.Pm4
Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44: 515-521 (2000) The rise of Italian embryology 515 The rise of embryology in Italy: from the Renaissance to the early 20th century MASSIMO DE FELICI* and GREGORIO SIRACUSA Department of Public Health and Cell Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy. In the present paper, the Italian embryologists and their main the history of developmental biology were performed (see contributions to this science before 1900 will be shortly reviewed. "Molecularising embryology: Alberto Monroy and the origins of During the twentieth century, embryology became progressively Developmental Biology in Italy" by B. Fantini, in the present issue). integrated with cytology and histology and the new sciences of genetics and molecular biology, so that the new discipline of Embryology in the XV and XVI centuries developmental biology arose. The number of investigators directly or indirectly involved in problems concerning developmental biol- After the first embryological observations and theories by the ogy, the variety of problems and experimental models investi- great ancient Greeks Hippocrates, Aristotle and Galen, embryol- gated, became too extensive to be conveniently handled in the ogy remained asleep for almost two thousand years. In Italy at the present short review (see "Molecularising embryology: Alberto beginning of Renaissance, the embryology of Aristotle and Galen Monroy and the origins of Developmental Biology in Italy" by B. was largely accepted and quoted in books like De Generatione Fantini, in the present issue). Animalium and De Animalibus by Alberto Magno (1206-1280), in There is no doubt that from the Renaissance to the early 20th one of the books of the Summa Theologica (De propagatione century, Italian scientists made important contributions to estab- hominis quantum ad corpus) by Tommaso d’Aquino (1227-1274) lishing the morphological bases of human and comparative embry- and even in the Divina Commedia (in canto XXV of Purgatorio) by ology and to the rise of experimental embryology.