DOCSLIB.ORG

Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Published by Maine DEP December 30, 2011 Resource Pesticide Source Last Date Reviewed CAS Chemical Name Notation Reviewed Listed 2011 NSPIRS 50-29-3 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 56-35-9 Bis(tributyltin)oxide (TBTO) P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 57-74-9 Chlordane P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 60-57-1 Dieldrin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 61-82-5 Amitrole P Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 62-73-7 DDVP (Dichlorvos) P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 62-74-8 Sodium fluoroacetate P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 63-25-2 Carbaryl P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 66-81-9 Cycloheximide P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 72-20-8 Endrin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 72-43-5 Methoxychlor P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 74-83-9 Methyl bromide, as a structural fumigant P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 75-60-5 Cacadylic acid P(A)(O) Dec_2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 76-44-8 Heptachlor P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 76-87-9 stannane, hydroxytriphenyl- P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 82-68-8 Pentachloronitrobenzene P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 88-85-7 Dinoseb P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 94-82-6 2,4-D butyric acid P Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 95-06-7 Sulfallate P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 114-26-1 Propoxur P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 115-29-7 Endosulfan P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 115-32-2 Dicofol P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro-5-[(4- 116-29-0 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, chlorophenyl)sulfonyl]- TOXNET Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Published by Maine DEP December 30, 2011 Resource Pesticide Source Last Date Reviewed CAS Chemical Name Notation Reviewed Listed 2011 NSPIRS 122-14-5 Fenitrothion P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS Fall/Winter NSPIRS 133-06-2 Captan P(A) sites '08/'09 2011 TOXNET NSPRIS 133-07-3 Folpet P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 Di-n -propyl isocinchomeronate (MGK NSPIRS 136-45-8 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 Repellent 326) 2011 NSPIRS Fall/Winter NSPIRS 137-26-8 Thiram P(A) sites '08/'09 2011 TOXNET NSPIRS 137-42-8 Metham sodium P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 138-93-2 Disodium cyanodithioimidocarbonate P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 140-57-8 Aramite P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 142-59-6 Nabam P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 143-50-0 Chlordecone (Kepone) P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 301-12-2 Oxydemeton methyl P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 309-00-2 Aldrin P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 330-54-1 Diuron P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 330-55-2 Linuron P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 379-52-2 Stannane, fluorotriphenyl- P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 benzeneacetic acid, 4-chloro-.alpha.-(4- NSPIRS 510-15-6 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 chlorophenyl)-.alpha.-hydroxy-, ethyl ester 2011 NSPIRS 542-75-6 1,3-Dichloropropene P Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 759-94-4 Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 886-50-0 Terbutryn P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 900-95-8 Fentin acetate = triphenyltin acetate P(NR) Dec. 2011 Jul-09 2011 NSPIRS 959-98-8 Endosulfan, alpha P(M) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide P(M) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 1113-02-6 Omethoate P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1134-23-2 Cycloate P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1461-22-9 Stannane, tributylchloro- P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Published by Maine DEP December 30, 2011 Resource Pesticide Source Last Date Reviewed CAS Chemical Name Notation Reviewed Listed 2011 NSPIRS 1582-09-8 Trifluralin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1596-84-5 Daminozide P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1689-84-5 Bromoxynil P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1689-99-2 Bromoxynil octanoate P(A) Dec. 2011 Jul-09 2011 NSPIRS 1836-75-5 Nitrofen P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 benzenamine, N-butyl-N-ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4- NSPIRS 1861-40-1 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 (trifluoromethyl)- 2011 NSPIRS 1912-24-9 atrazine P Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1918-02-1 Picloram P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 1918-16-7 Propachlor P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 acetic acid, (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)-, 2- NSPIRS 1928-47-8 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 ethylhexyl ester 2011 NSPIRS 1929-82-4 Nitrapyrin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, Merck 2006 NSPIRS 1983-10-4 Stannane, tributylfluoro- P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET ethyl O-(p-nitrophenyl) phenyl NSPIRS 2104-64-5 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 phosphonothionate 2011 NSPIRS 2227-13-6 tetrasul P(NR) Dec. 2011 Jul-09 2011 carbamothioic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, S- NSPIRS 2303-17-5 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 (2,3,3-trichloro-2-propenyl) ester 2011 NSPIRS 2312-35-8 Propargite P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 2385-85-5 Mirex P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 2425-06-1 Captafol P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 2439-01-2 Oxythioquinox (Chinomethionat) P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET acetic acid, (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)-, 2- NSPIRS 2545-59-7 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 butoxyethyl ester 2011 NSPIRS 2593-15-9 Terrazole P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6- NSPIRS 2921-88-2 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 trichloro-2-pyridyl) ester 2011 NSPIRS 4329-12-8 m,p'-DDD P(M) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 4342-36-3 Stannane, (benzoyloxy)tributyl- P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Published by Maine DEP December 30, 2011 Resource Pesticide Source Last Date Reviewed CAS Chemical Name Notation Reviewed Listed 2011 NSPIRS 5902-51-2 Terbacil P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 6164-98-3 Chlordimeform P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 7784-40-9 lead hydrogen arsenate P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 8001-35-2 Toxaphene P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 8001-50-1 strobane P(NR) Dec. 2011 Jul-09 2011 NSPIRS 8018-01-7 Mancozeb P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 9006-42-2 Metiram P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 10453-86-8 Resmethrin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 12427-38-2 Maneb P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 12789-03-6 Chlordane P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 13121-70-5 stannane, tricyclohexylhydroxy- P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 13194-48-4 Ethoprop P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 distannoxane, hexakis(2-methyl-2- NSPIRS 13356-08-6 P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 phenylpropyl)- 2011 NSPIRS 15972-60-8 Alachlor P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 17804-35-2 Benomyl P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 19044-88-3 Oryzalin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 propanoic acid, 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)- NSPIRS 19398-13-1 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 , 2-butoxyethyl ester 2011 NSPIRS 19666-30-9 Oxadiazon P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 20354-26-1 Methazole P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 21087-64-9 Metribuzin P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 21725-46-2 Cyanazine P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 23103-98-2 Pirimicarb P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 23564-05-8 Thiophanate methyl P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 23950-58-5 Pronamide P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 24124-25-2 Stannane, tributyl[(1-oxo-9,12-octadecad P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 Pesticides Removed from Chemicals of Concern List Published by Maine DEP December 30, 2011 Resource Pesticide Source Last Date Reviewed CAS Chemical Name Notation Reviewed Listed 2011 NSPIRS 26239-64-5 Stannane, tributyl[[[1,2,3,4,4a,4b,5,6,1 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester = NSPIRS 26354-18-7 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 Stannane, tributylmeacrylate 2011 benzenamine, N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-2,6- NSPIRS 26399-36-0 P(NR) Dec. 2011 July 2009 dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)- 2011 NSPIRS 26644-46-2 Triforine P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 32809-16-8 Procymidone P(NR) Dec. 2011 Jul-09 2011 NSPIRS 33089-61-1 Amitraz P(A) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011 NSPIRS 33213-65-9 Endosulfan, beta P(M) Dec. 2011 July 2009 2011, TOXNET NSPIRS 34256-82-1 Acetochlor P Dec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Restricted Use Product Summary Report
    Page 1 of 17 Restricted Use Product Summary Report (January 19, 2016) Percent Active Registration # Name Company # Company Name Active Ingredient(s) Ingredient 4‐152 BONIDE ORCHARD MOUSE BAIT 4 BONIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 2 Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) 70‐223 RIGO EXOTHERM TERMIL 70 VALUE GARDENS SUPPLY, LLC 20 Chlorothalonil 100‐497 AATREX 4L HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 42.6 Atrazine 100‐585 AATREX NINE‐O HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 88.2 Atrazine 100‐669 CURACRON 8E INSECTICIDE‐MITICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 73 Profenofos 100‐817 BICEP II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐827 BICEP LITE II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 28.1; 35.8 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐886 BICEP MAGNUM 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33.7; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐898 AGRI‐MEK 0.15 EC MITICIDE/INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2 Abamectin 100‐903 DENIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2.15 Emamectin benzoate 100‐904 PROCLAIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 5 Emamectin benzoate 100‐998 KARATE 1EC 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1075 FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 3 Tefluthrin Acetochlor; Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl‐ 100‐1083 DOUBLEPLAY SELECTIVE HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 16.9; 67.8 , S‐ethyl ester 100‐1086 KARATE EC‐W INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1088 SCIMITAR GC INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION,
    [Show full text]
  • Cypermethrin
    International Environmental Health Criteria 82 Cypermethrin Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1989 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: 1. Mercury 2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls 3. Lead 4. Oxides of Nitrogen 5. Nitrates, Nitrites, and N-Nitroso Compounds 6. Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part 1 7. Photochemical Oxidants 8. Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Particulate Matter 9. DDT and its Derivatives 10. Carbon Disulfide 11. Mycotoxins 12. Noise 13. Carbon Monoxide 14. Ultraviolet Radiation 15. Tin and Organotin Compounds 16. Radiofrequency and Microwaves 17. Manganese 18. Arsenic 19. Hydrogen Sulfide 20. Selected Petroleum Products 21. Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride 22. Ultrasound 23. Lasers and Optical Radiation 24. Titanium 25. Selected Radionuclides 26. Styrene 27. Guidelines on Studies in Environmental Epidemiology 28. Acrylonitrile 29. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) 30. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy 31. Tetrachloroethylene 32. Methylene Chloride 33. Epichlorohydrin 34. Chlordane 35. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields 36. Fluorine and Fluorides 37. Aquatic (Marine and Freshwater) Biotoxins 38. Heptachlor 39. Paraquat and Diquat 40. Endosulfan 41. Quintozene 42. Tecnazene 43. Chlordecone 44. Mirex continued on p. 156
    [Show full text]
  • Chem7988.Pdf
    This article was originally published in a journal published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues that you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Chemosphere 67 (2007) 2184–2191 www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Assessment of pesticide contamination in three Mississippi Delta oxbow lakes using Hyalella azteca M.T. Moore *, R.E. Lizotte Jr., S.S. Knight, S. Smith Jr., C.M. Cooper USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, P.O. Box 1157, Oxford, MS 38655, United States Received 8 September 2006; received in revised form 27 November 2006; accepted 8 December 2006 Available online 26 January 2007 Abstract Three oxbow lakes in northwestern Mississippi, USA, an area of intensive agriculture, were assessed for biological impairment from historic and current-use pesticide contamination using the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. Surface water and sediment samples from three sites in each lake were collected from Deep Hollow, Beasley, and Thighman Lakes from September 2000 to February 2001. Samples were analyzed for 17 historic and current-use pesticides and selected metabolites.
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Ri Wkh% Lrorjlfdo (Iihfwv Ri 6Hohfwhg &Rqvwlwxhqwv
    Guidelines for Interpretation of the Biological Effects of Selected Constituents in Biota, Water, and Sediment November 1998 NIATIONAL RRIGATION WQATER UALITY P ROGRAM INFORMATION REPORT No. 3 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Geological Survey Bureau of Indian Affairs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ntroduction The guidelines, criteria, and other information in The Limitations of This Volume this volume were originally compiled for use by personnel conducting studies for the It is important to note five limitations on the Department of the Interior's National Irrigation material presented here: Water Quality Program (NIWQP). The purpose of these studies is to identify and address (1) Out of the hundreds of substances known irrigation-induced water quality and to affect wetlands and water bodies, this contamination problems associated with any of volume focuses on only nine constituents or the Department's water projects in the Western properties commonly identified during States. When NIWQP scientists submit NIWQP studies in the Western United samples of water, soil, sediment, eggs, or animal States—salinity, DDT, and the trace tissue for chemical analysis, they face a elements arsenic, boron, copper, mercury, challenge in determining the sig-nificance of the molybdenum, selenium, and zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Hop Management Guide 2018
    2018 Michigan Hop Management Guide This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2015-09785. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2 Table of Contents Growth Stages………………………………………………………………………………………3 Weed Management………………………………………………………………………….4-5 Herbicides………………..……………………………………………………………………….6-7 Fungicides……………………………..………………………………………………………….8-9 Insecticides…………………………..………………………………………………………10-11 Miticides…………………………………………………………………………………………….12 Pesticide Toxicity to Beneficial Insects…………………………………………..13-14 Nutrient Management Considerations…………………………………………15-19 Scouting Calendar………………………………………………………………………………20 Information presented here does not supersede the label directions. To protect yourself, others, and the environment, always read the label before applying any pesticide. Although efforts have been made to check the accuracy of information presented, it is the responsibility of the person using this information to verify that it is correct by reading the corresponding pesticide label in its entirety before using the product. The information presented here is intended as a guide for Michigan hop growers in selecting pesticides and is for educational purposes only. Labels can and do change. For current label and MSDS information, visit one of the following free online databases: greenbook.net, cdms.com, and agrian.com The efficacies of products listed have not been evaluated on hop in Michigan. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by Michigan State University Extension or bias against those not mentioned. This information was compiled by Erin Lizotte and Dr. Robert Sirrine with assistance from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn and Soybean Mode of Action Herbicide Chart
    By Premix Corn and Soybean This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer Herbicide Chart to the Mode of Action chart for more information. Component Repeated use of herbicides with the same Site of Premix Trade Active Action site of action can result in the development of Trade Name ® Name ® Ingredient Group* herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First ............... Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Axiom ........................... Define flufenacet 15 This publication was designed for commercial printing, color shifts may occur on other printers and on-screeen. Sencor metribuzin 5 Basis . ........................... Resolve rimsulfuron 2 Harmony GT thifensulfuron 2 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Bicep II Magnum .......... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist Bicep Lite II Magnum .... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 you in selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in Boundary ...................... Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 herbicide use and 2) to rotate among herbicides with different Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ ............... Breakfree acetochlor 15 sites of action to delay the development of herbicide resistance. atrazine atrazine 5 Breakfree ATZ Lite ........ Breakfree acetochlor 15 Number of atrazine atrazine 5 resistant weed Buctril + Atrazine ......... Buctril bromoxynil 6 atrazine atrazine 5 species in U.S. Bullet ............................ Micro-Tech alachlor 15 Site of Chemical Active atrazine atrazine 5 Action Product Examples Camix ........................... Callisto mesotrione 28 Group* Site of Action Family Ingredient (Trade Name ®) Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Lipid Canopy DF ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Cause of Sediment Toxicity in Agricultural Sediments: the Role of Pyrethroids and Nine Seldom-Measured Hydrophobic Pesticides ⇑ Donald P
    Chemosphere 90 (2013) 958–964 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Chemosphere journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Identifying the cause of sediment toxicity in agricultural sediments: The role of pyrethroids and nine seldom-measured hydrophobic pesticides ⇑ Donald P. Weston a, , Yuping Ding b, Minghua Zhang c, Michael J. Lydy b a Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 1005 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA b Fisheries and Illinois Aquaculture Center and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, 171 Life Sciences II, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA c Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA highlights " Monitoring fails to test for many agricultural pesticides used in any given area. " Nine seldom-analyzed pesticides (e.g., abamectin) were tested for in sediments. " One-quarter of the sediment samples were toxic to the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. " The seldom-analyzed pesticides may have contributed to toxicity in a few samples. " Pyrethroid insecticides were responsible for the vast majority of toxicity. article info abstract Article history: Few currently used agricultural pesticides are routinely monitored for in the environment. Even if Received 10 January 2012 concentrations are known, sediment LC50 values are often lacking for common sediment toxicity testing Received in revised form 16 May 2012 species. To help fill this data gap, sediments in California’s Central Valley were tested for nine hydropho- Accepted 27 June 2012 bic pesticides seldom analyzed: abamectin, diazinon, dicofol, fenpropathrin, indoxacarb, methyl para- Available online 23 July 2012 thion, oxyfluorfen, propargite, and pyraclostrobin. Most were detected, but rarely at concentrations acutely toxic to Hyalella azteca or Chironomus dilutus.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse and Field Evaluation of Isoxaflutole for Weed Control In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Greenhouse and field evaluation of isoxaflutole for weed control in maize in China Received: 27 June 2017 Ning Zhao, Lan Zuo, Wei Li, Wenlei Guo, Weitang Liu & Jinxin Wang Accepted: 18 September 2017 Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to provide a reference for pre-emergence (PRE) Published: xx xx xxxx application of isoxaflutole on maize in China. In greenhouse study, the isoxaflutole PRE application at 30 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1 could effectively control large numbers of weeds, especially some large-seeded broadleaves, tested in this study. The tolerance results indicated 21 maize hybrids showed different responses to isoxaflutole under greenhouse conditions. In 2015 and 2016, field experiments were conducted to determine and compare the weed control efficacy and safety to Zhengdan 958 maize with 6 herbicide treatments. In both years, isoxaflutole PRE at 100 to 250 g a.i. ha−1 was sufficient to provide satisfactory full-season control of the dominant common broadleaf and grass weeds in the field. Temporary injury to maize was observed with isoxaflutole treatments of 125, 150, and 250 g a.i. ha−1 in both years, but plants recovered within 4 to 6 wk. To maximize maize yield and provide satisfactory weed control, a range of 100 to 150 g a.i. ha−1 of isoxaflutole is recommended, depending on the soil characteristics, weather, and weed species present at the experimental site. Based on the results, isoxaflutole PRE has good potential for weed control in maize in China. Maize was planted on more hectares than any other crops in China from 2010 to 2014, with an average of 35 million ha planted per year and yield averaging 5,779 kg per ha per year1.
    [Show full text]
  • Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil
    Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil L. A. Gaston* and M. A. Locke ABSTRACT repulsion effects, acifluorfen is sorbed by soil or soil Potential surface water and groundwater contaminants include her- constituents (Pusino et al., 1991; Ruggiero et al., 1992; bicides that are applied postemergence. Although applied to the plant Pusino et al., 1993; Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., canopy, a portion of any application reaches the soil either directly 1995; Locke et al., 1997). Although the extent of sorp- or via subsequent foliar washoff. This study examined sorption, degra- tion in soil is generally proportional to OC content dation, and mobility of the postemergence herbicide acifluorfen (5-[2- (Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., 1995; Locke et al., chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid) in Dundee 1997), sorption likely involves processes other than par- silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic, Aeric Ochraqualf) taken titioning between aqueous and organic matter phases. from conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) field plots. Homogeneous In particular, acifluorfen forms complexes with divalent surface and subsurface samples were used in the sorption and degrada- tion studies; intact soil columns (30 cm long and 10 cm diam.) were and trivalent cations (Pusino et al., 1991; Pusino et al., used in the mobility study. Batch sorption isotherms were nonlinear 1993) that may be sorbed or precipitated. Complex for- (Freundlich model) and sorption paralleled organic C (OC) content. mation and subsequent sorption may partially account All tillage by depth combinations of soil exhibited a time-dependent for increased acifluorfen sorption with decreasing soil approach to sorption equilibrium that was well described by a two- pH or increasing cation exchange capacity (Pusino et site equilibrium±kinetic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]