DOCSLIB.ORG

Almere Homeruskwartier, the Largest Self-Building District in Post-War Netherlands Post-War in District Self-Building Largest the Homeruskwartier, Almere

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Almere Homeruskwartier, the Largest Self-Building District in Post-War Netherlands Post-War in District Self-Building Largest the Homeruskwartier, Almere 126 Almere Homeruskwartier, the largest self-building district in post-war Netherlands PHOTO: ADRIENNE NORMAN Phantom Urbanism – No Choice The Ghost Towns of Angola over our p 52 Impressions from Almere Heads – p 134 Self-building Better than in Almere It Was – The 127 Make Architecture Remarkable Great Again – The Transformation Architect as Developer of Tirana p 66 p 86 Simple Jacqueline Answers to Simple Questions – The Architect Tellinga as Client p 118 The Land Belongs to the People – The Battle for Munich p 94 Building one’s own house may have become an exception in the West, but in the Nether- lands this practice has made a serious comeback since the crisis of 2008. In the city of Almere, founded a mere forty years ago and currently the country’s seventh largest city, self-building has come to 128 represent a viable alternative within a developer-led mar- ket. Jacqueline Tellinga, board member of the Profes- sional Association of Dutch Urban Designers and Planners (BNSP), argues the case for self-building. tively cheap. Berlin is known creasingly concentrated in everyone to participate and amongst investors as the Aldi the hands of a few. Power is acquire wealth. In his view, of the housing market and, as inevitably in the same hands. non-freedom and inequality a result, home prices have Nowhere is this felt more are the norm, which have only come under serious pressure. acutely than in the housing been successfully broken The German situation is de- market, in which the energy of down in societies where peo- scribed clearly in the ARD re- people who want to invest in ple organised themselves I port 'Ungleichland', which fol- their own homes and living from the bottom up. In such lows multi-millionaire investor environment is routinely sup- exceptionally equal socie- and project developer Chris- planted by those better or- ties, in which power is no toph Gröner, who trades in ganised and more powerful, longer exclusively in the In ancient times we did not real estate with the sole pur- which in turn has led to pleas hands of a king, nobility or know any better than that cit- pose of ‘making capital work’ to open up the housing mar- any elite, a truly open market ies were built by citizens them- on behalf of the anonymous ket to small-scale, individual can flourish. Currently, how- selves. Most of the houses wealthy. participants. In this context, ever, he argues that we are in along Amsterdam's canals Developments such as those reference should be made to a time of declining freedom from the 17th century, for in- in Berlin and in Amsterdam the book 'The Invisible Hand? and equality. “We must pre- stance, were built by private imply fundamental changes How Market Economies Have serve the good of markets, but individuals for private use. To- in terms of the quality of life Emerged and Declined Since we must counteract the domi- day, prosperous cities like Am- and general affordability of AD 500' by economic histori- nance of the elites.” sterdam are firmly on the radar neighbourhoods in these cit- an Bas van Bavel.2 In this book of international capital and ies. Neighbourhoods where he argues that important mar- Utopian models and the same houses primarily the maximisation of rental in- ket economies, after initial micro-societies serve as investment opportu- come has become the prime periods of emergence and nities for third parties. The phe- motive generally suffer from a prosperity are inevitably fol- Having extensively worked on nomenon of buy-to-let, high turnover of inhabitants lowed by a period of decay. the development of self-built through which investors buy up and therefore slowly lose their He proves his point with three neighbourhoods, I see a ten- existing homes with the aim to connection to the area. Buy- major, pre-industrial exam- dency to increasingly push rent them out expensively – to-let leads to a housing stock ples of successful market self-builders out of the 'so- generally after having split owned by the wealthy, who do economies in western Eurasia: called’ market. Their legitima- them up into separate apart- not live there themselves and Iraq in the early Middle Ages, cy is still very much ques- ments – is firmly entrenched. push up prices in the mean- Italy in the high Middle Ages, tioned. 129 time. Even more problematic and the Low Countries in the For those interested in the cor- is the ‘buy-to-leave’ phenom- late Middle Ages and the ear- relation between self-reli- Make enon, where investors deliber- ly modern period, and then ance and social engage- ately do not want to rent out draws parallels with England ment, I would briefly like to Architecture and cause vacancy rates be- and the United States in the discuss three examples of cause tenants could be a diffi- modern period. self-built developments: the Great cult obstacle to a quick resale. The process is invariably the projects of Walter Segal, ‘Bau- same: in their early phases, gruppen’, and allotment gar- Again – these market economies tend dens. Phantom to generate growth, reward During the 1970s and 1980s, The Archi- initiative and entrepreneur- two hundred families in the Urbanism – ship and increase labour pro- United Kingdom single-hand- tect as ductivity. During this early edly built their homes, using The Ghost phase, major technological the system of pioneering ar- Developer leaps takes place. But then, chitect Walter Segal. What p 66 Towns with the emergence of new connected these people was elites – inevitably a conse- that they were all entrepre- of Angola quence of the initial success – neurial, but none of them had In 2017 one of every eight the rules of the game change. enough money for a private homes in Amsterdam was p 52 The new elites become a home. They opted for Segal’s bought by investors1 (The re- self-serving political force, in- prototype design – a wooden search into major property In China, the point has been equality increases and the frame, with insulation and a owners in Amsterdam is based reached that the government earlier economic develop- weatherproof shell – which on public information from the not only finds it bad for the ment stagnates. Once those was a quick and economical Land Registry). housing market, but also im- elites get hold of two of the way of building. None of the Amsterdam is not the only moral to speculate with hous- three factors of production – people had technical skills, place affected by this trend. ing rather than living in it. Pres- land and capital – the rest of but they simply rolled up their German cities too, with their ident Xi Jinping is committed the population is left with only sleeves, went to work in their comparatively cheap real es- to a mandatory cooling of the the ability to provide work – own time and acquired the tate, have been discovered as housing market. the third factor of production necessary knowledge along profitable piggy banks for – and falls behind. Van Bavel’s the way. Segal's construction capital-seeking yield, par- The Invisible Hand? observations clash with the system was a way to build af- ticularly because their real neoliberal idea of the market fordably and led to extensive estate, compared to cities like In the twenty-first century, pri- as a neutral mechanism, cooperation and a vibrant London and Paris, is still rela- vate equity has become in- which supposedly allows community spirit. Everybody would work on their individual Another form of community Houses and gardens are pri- rectly to its citizens, and was homes, but when it was time to spirit and far-reaching self- vate; the property rights of set in motion with the Ikbouw- erect the main frame for a sin- regulation are the allotment which are not shared within mijnhuisinAlmere programme gle house, the whole group gardens dating back to the the group. of 2006. would come together and beginning of the 20th century. Self-building should not pri- The Homeruskwartier firmly help. To date, no one has been These unique micro-societies marily be judged on the merit calls into question the legiti- able to come up with a good are also organised as a col- of creating closer social com- macy of the collusion be- explanation why these de- lective. As a small communi- munities. The essence is in the tween cities and professional signs never went mainstream ty, the members adhere to an economic logic it unleashes – developers and indicates the – either as social housing or as extensive code of conduct on in that it mobilises the means keenness on the part of ordi- private developments. a voluntarily basis. The man- and the thinking power of tens nary people to produce their The Baugruppen in Germany agement and accountability or hundreds of thousands of own houses without the inter- are a similar idea. In the 1990s, of the individual towards the which is inevitably a source of mediaries. Here, people show how they want to live and build for themselves once they are really given the free- dom to do so. Simple Answers to Simple Questions – The Architect as Client p 118 A rich mix of living ideas has been achieved on a variety of 130 plots. Thanks to brochures and Homeruskwartier 2016. The first 350 plots came on the market just before the financial crisis. While private developers ‘plot passports’, those inter- began to suffer a lack of equity, self builders continued to invest and build. Jacqueline Tellinga has been ‘concept ested were able to make their en gebiedsontwikkelaar’ Homeruskwartier 2006 – 2015.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Birmingham at School with the Avant Garde
    University of Birmingham At School with the avant garde: Grosvenor, Ian; van Gorp, Angelo DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2018.1451559 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Grosvenor, I & van Gorp, A 2018, 'At School with the avant garde: European architects and the modernist project in England', History of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2018.1451559 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in History of Education on 19/04/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0046760X.2018.1451559 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsstelle Almere Msg Life Benelux B.V
    Anfahrtsbeschreibung Geschäftsstelle Almere msg life Benelux B.V. PJ Oudweg 41 | 1314 CJ Almere | Niederlande Telefon: +31 33 798 0000 | E-Mail: [email protected] | www.msg-life.com Anreise mit öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln Almere Tussen de Vaarten abbiegen. Folgen Sie der s101/ Vom Hauptbahnhof Amsterdam: 20-30 min Fahrtzeit Hogering. Folgen Sie dem Straßenverlauf für 1.600 m und Nehmen Sie den Zug in Richtung Almere Centrum/Zwolle biegen Sie links in das Markerdreef ein. Nach 900 m bie- bis zur Haltestelle Almere Centrum. Dann nehmen Sie den gen Sie rechts in das Spoordreef ab und nach 1,3 km links nördlichen Ausgang, gehen zum WTC-Gebäude und biegen in die Schoutstraat. Sie befinden sich nun in der Schoutga- links ab auf P. J. Oudplein. Nach ca. 70 m biegen Sie rechts rage. in den P. J. Oudweg ein. Aus Richtung Zwolle: ca. 75 min Fahrtzeit Vom Flughafen: ca. 30 min Fahrtzeit Nehmen Sie die Autobahn A28 Richtung Kampen/Apel- Fahren Sie mit dem Intercity Richtung Groningen, Lelystad doorn/Amersfoort und folgen Sie ihr für 35 km. Nehmen Sie Centrum oder Leeuwarden bis zur Haltestelle Almere Cent- die Ausfahrt 13-Lelystad und biegen rechts ab auf Knardijk/ rum. Dann folgen Sie bitte den obigen Anweisungen. N302. Biegen Sie rechts ab auf die N305 Richtung Lelystad/ Dronten. An der Ampel links abbiegen auf die N302 Rich- Anreise mit dem PKW zur P12 Schoutgarage tung Leystad und auf die A6 Richtung Almere. Nehmen Sie Aus Richtung Amsterdam: ca. 30 min Fahrtzeit die Ausfahrt 6 in Richtung Almere Tussen de Vaarten. Fol- Folgen Sie der A27 Richtung Almere.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Municipalities Are Becoming Greener: Some Political and Institutional Explanations
    TI 2017-086/VIII Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Dutch Municipalities are Becoming Greener: Some Political and Institutional Explanations Raymond (R.H.J.M.) Gradus1 Elbert (E.) Dijkgraaf2 1: School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands 2: Erasmus Tinbergen Institute is the graduate school and research institute in economics of Erasmus University Rotterdam, the University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam. Contact: [email protected] More TI discussion papers can be downloaded at the Tinbergen Site Tinbergen Institute has two locations: Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Gustav Mahlerplein 117 1082 MS Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 598 4580 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Dutch municipalities are becoming greener: some political and institutional explanations Raymond Gradus1 and Elbert Dijkgraaf2 Abstract: This paper analyzes whether Dutch municipalities have become greener between 1999 and 2014 by investigating whether they implement different unit-based pricing systems. Based on their incentive, systems are ranged from green (‘weight’) to less green (‘volume’) or no green (‘flat rate’). In one third of the municipalities, shifts took place, with 83 percent becoming greener and 17 percent less greener. Political fragmentation (measured in three ways) plays a key role in explaining these shifts. There is less evidence for political motivation. Particularly, conservative liberals are not in favor of unit-based pricing, whereas social liberals are in favor. In addition, municipalities in rural and shrinking areas are more in favor of unit-based pricing as well Keywords: local government; unit-based waste pricing; (less) greener; ideological motivation 1 Introduction In the Netherlands, Dutch municipalities are responsible for waste collection and separation (Dijkgraaf and Gradus, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • SUCCESSFUL SCHEMES the University of Sheffield School of Architecture, Ash Sakula Architects and Design for Homes
    Collective Custom Build is a web-based advocacy tool that makes the case for developing Collective Custom Build as part of a more diverse housing market in the UK, It uses an animated narrative to curate key research findings, revealing them as peelbacks at key points in its argument. Collective Custom Build is part of the Motivating Collective Custom Build practice-based research project within the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) funded Home Improvements Knowledge Exchange based at the University of Sheffield. Motivating Collective Custom build is led jointly by SUCCESSFUL SCHEMES the University of Sheffield School of Architecture, Ash Sakula Architects and Design for Homes. Email [email protected] Successful schemes in the UK and abroad Twitter @CoCuBuild Summary There are a number of successfully completed schemes - both in the UK and internationally - that can be broadly categorised by the three families of Collective Custom Build1. In the UK, most established models are of the Independent Group Custom Build or Supported Community Custom Build variety. There is a rich, if relatively niche history of independent ‘group self- build’ in the UK, and according to the National Self Build Association (NaSBA) there have also been around twenty multi-unit ‘self-build’ projects delivered by Housing Associations, Registered Providers or councils over the last thirty years, working in partnership with 3rd sector organisations such as the Community Self Build Agency (CSBA) or private sector organisations like D&O Management Services Ltd. These organisations help to set up the scheme, recruit the participants and ‘drive’ them to completion (NaSBA, 2013a, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Gezonde Omgeving Flevoland Almere
    GEZONDE OMGEVING FLEVOLAND ALMERE GEWICHT HOEVEELHEID GROEN 54% 53% groen anders % ondergewicht gezond gewicht overgewicht ernstig overgewicht Almere Flevoland 46% 46% 74% 78% Almere Flevoland ALCOHOL Almere 5% 6% Flevoland Drinkt alcohol Zware drinker MANTELZORG 17% 18% & VRIJWILLIGERSWERK ROKEN Almere Flevoland 2% 3% Almere 28% Flevoland Roker Zware roker 20% 15% 14% ANGST & DEPRESSIE hoog risico minder risico % Geeft mantelzorg Doet vrijwilligerswerk 10% 8% Almere Flevoland GELUIDSHINDER Ervaren geluidshinder (% matig - ernstig) BEWEGING Almere voldoende onvoldoende % Flevoland 24% verkeer <= 50 km 20% 45% 16% Almere verkeer > 50 km/u 14% 46% 10% treinverkeer 7% Flevoland 21% vliegverkeer 17% 29% brommers/scooters 27% 31% buren 27% GGD006 Infographic Leefomgeving 2019-06-18 GEZONDE OMGEVING FLEVOLAND “GGD Flevoland zet zich in voor GGD Flevoland adviseert gemeenten en organisaties over gezondheidsaspecten en een kwalitatief goede, veilige en mogelijke maatregelen bij planvorming, beleid en keuze van activiteiten. gezondere leefomgeving, die de inwoners van Flevoland uitnodigt tot Dit overzicht is een weergave van een aantal gezondheidsaspecten van de Flevolandse gezond gedrag en beschermt tegen inwoners en een aantal maatregelen die een positief effect op hun gezondheid kan hebben. gezondheidsrisico’s. ” Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk en Zeewolde zijn de zes gemeenten Een gezonde leefomgeving wordt bepaald door van Flevoland. Op 1 januari 2019 telt de provincie Flevoland 416.431 inwoners. Almere de invloed van milieuaspecten (lucht, geluid) is met 207.819 de grootste gemeente. en de fysieke en sociale leefomgeving die als prettig worden ervaren op gebied van veiligheid, Gebruikte Bronnen: RIVM www.loketgezondleven.nl februari 2019 / Centraal bureau voor de statistiek / www. gezondheid en deelname aan de samenleving.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Revival and Ideology – What’S Left? by Peter Guillery
    Vernacular Revival and Ideology – What’s Left? by Peter Guillery This essay derives from a lecture first given at a Vernacular Architecture Group conference on vernacular revivals in 2015, reprised to generally younger audiences at the Bartlett School of Architecture and the University of Westminster. Its retrospection about vernacular architecture, anonymity, revival and left-wing ideologies was prompted primarily by a bemused awareness of recent advances in self-building. It seemed timely to try to get at how and why certain ideas retain traction. Then, coincidentally, young and old were recombining behind Jeremy Corbyn to reinvigorate Labour, and the self-styled design ‘collective’ Assemble won the Turner Prize. John Ruskin, William Morris, the Arts and Crafts Movement and Romanticism will arise (how could they not?), but only in passing, for a revisionist view of what has come since. It is taken as read that a strong commitment to architectural design as being rooted in labour and everyday or subaltern agency tallied with the emergence of socialism and was an important part of architectural thinking and history in late-19th-century England. This is an attempt to relate that history to the present in a new overview for a new framework. It adopts an unconventional or purist definition of what vernacular means that will clash with many preconceptions. Peter Guillery is an architectural historian and editor for the Survey of London, in the Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London. He is the author of The Small House in Eighteenth-Century London (2004), and the editor of Built from Below: British Architecture and the Vernacular (2011), and (with David Kroll) Mobilising Housing Histories: Learning from London’s Past (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Plan International Education MRA the Amsterdam Area Continues to Attract International Talent
    Delta Plan International Education MRA The Amsterdam Area continues to attract international talent. As a result, demand for sufficient international school places has risen and continues to do so. This brochure gives an overview of the Delta Plan analysis and solutions. Current choice of internationals Dutch education Public Dutch schools leading to Dutch diploma The region offers hundreds of high quality education options International education Public and private international schools leading to Dutch diploma The region has 10 international schools with a total capacity 45% 45% of 5.500 places 10% Why do 45% of the internationals opt for Dutch education? Bilingual education • Many schools to choose from that are close to home Public schools, English/Dutch leading to • Allows for easy integration in local Dutch community Dutch diploma • Dutch education is of high quality according to OECD The region has 80 primary schools and • State funded and therefore more affordable 15 secondary schools that offer bilingual • Good option for non-English speakers, because it does education not require a certain level of English • State funded newcomer classes for learning Dutch are offered to international children between 6 and 18 years old Actions Delta Plan 2016 - 2020 Amsterdam Metropolitan 01 02 Expand Facilitate Expand capacity of Facilitate two new all international schools international schools by 1500 places to create by 2020 a total of 7000 places in 2020 03 04 05 Improve Increase Provide Improve access to Increase Provide more English Dutch
    [Show full text]
  • Almerealmere Newnew Town:Town: Dutchdutch Plannersplanners Getget Itit Rightright Daviddavid P.P
    AlmereAlmere NewNew Town:Town: DutchDutch PlannersPlanners GetGet itit RightRight DavidDavid P.P. VaradyVarady HistoricalHistorical OverviewOverview Situated in the province of Flevoland and in the Amsterdam metropolitan area. After WWII housing was needed for the growing population of Amsterdam and two were planned in the polders. The town of Oostelijk Flevoland became Lelystad and the town of Zuidelijk Flevoland was called Zuidwestadd (South West City) on the first sketches. In the 1970s it became Almere , after the early medieval name of the Zuiderzee . Designers of Almere drew their inspiration from garden towns of England In 1976 the first inhabitants occupied the area. DemographicsDemographics Almere has a population of more than 188,000 residents making it the fifth largest city in the Raandstad . In 2007, the city council of Almere made agreements with the government to expand the city to 350,000 inhabitants by 2030. Diversity is high with a 27% foreign -born population. About 10% of the total population is Surinamese. The proportion of single mothers and the elderly is increasing. PlanningPlanning FlexibilityFlexibility andand CitizenCitizen ParticipationParticipation Planners were unsure of what people wanted so they laid out several cores: Almere -Haven, Almere -Stadt , Almere -Buiten , Almere - Hout , and Almere -Poort The different cores reflect changing architectural and town plan ning ideas over the last 30 years. Two neighborhoods, “Fantasy ” and “Reality ” which were originally designed with temporary housing were so successful that the buildings are still standing Driven by the motto ‘Ik bouw mijn huis in Almere / I build my house in Almere ’, the idea is to deliver a more complex, unpredictable, and spontaneous city than the carefully engineered and controlled on e of the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodemkwaliteitskaart Gemeenten Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk En Zeewolde
    Bodemkwaliteitskaart Gemeenten Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk en Zeewolde Documentcode: 17M1182.RAP001 Bodemkwaliteitskaart Gemeenten Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk en Zeewolde Documentcode: 17M1182.RAP001 Opdrachtgevers Gemeenten Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk en Zeewolde en de provincie Flevoland p/a Omgevingsdienst Flevoland & Gooi en Vechtstreek (OFGV) Postbus 2341 8203 AH LELYSTAD Contactpersoon namens opdrachtgevers Dhr. P. Richters (OFGV) Contactpersoon LievenseCSO Dhr. J.S. Spronk [email protected] Projectcode 17M1182 Documentnummer 17M1182.RAP001 Versiedatum 13 juli 2018 Status Definitief Autorisatie Documentnummer Versiedatum Status 17M1182.RAP001 13 juli 2018 Definitief Opgesteld door: Functie Datum Paraaf Jeroen Spronk Senior adviseur 13.07.2018 Collegiale toets door: Functie Datum Paraaf Karin Reezigt-Struijk Adviseur 13.07.2018 LIEVENSECSO MILIEU B.V. BUNNIK LEEUWARDEN MAASTRICHT HOOGVLIET Postbus 2 Postbus 422 Postbus 1323 Postbus 551 3980 CA Bunnik 8901 BE Leeuwarden 6201 BH Maastricht 3190 AM Rotterdam-Hoogvliet Regulierenring 6 Orionweg 28 Sleperweg 10 Hoefsmidstraat 41 3981 LB Bunnik 8938 AH Leeuwarden 6222 NK Maastricht 3194 AA Rotterdam-Hoogvliet E-mail: [email protected] Website: LievenseCSO.com IBAN:NL63 ABNA 0570208009 KvK-nummer: 30152124 BTW-nummer: NL. 8075.03.368.B.01 Inhoudsopgave Hoofdstuk Pagina 1 Inleiding ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aanleiding ..........................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Grens Gemeente Gooise Meren En Weesp
    2015 90 Besluit van gedeputeerde staten van Noord-Holland van 30 juni 2015, nr. 305888/610701, tot vaststelling van de grensbeschrijving van de nieuwe gemeente Gooise Meren en de grensbeschrijving van de gemeente Weesp Gedeputeerde Staten van Noord-Holland; gelet op publicatie van de wet tot samenvoeging van de gemeenten Bussum, Muiden en Naarden en wijziging van de grens met de gemeente Weesp in Staatsblad 216, jaargang 2015; gelet op publicatie van het besluit van houdende het tijdstip van inwerkingtreding van deze wet in Staatsblad 217, jaargang 2015; gelet op artikel 2, tweede lid, van de Wet algemene regels herindeling; Besluiten: Artikel 1 Gedeputeerde staten stellen de navolgende beschrijving van de grens vast van de nieuwe gemeente Gooise Meren, die zijn aangegeven op de bij dit besluit behorende twee kaarten: A. Grens met Amsterdam Vanaf het snijpunt van de grens tussen de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeenten Weesp en Amsterdam volgt de nieuwe grens de huidige grens tussen de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeente Amsterdam tot aan het snijpunt van de huidige grens van de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeenten Amsterdam en Diemen. B. Grens met Diemen Vanaf het onder A. laatstgenoemde snijpunt volgt de nieuwe grens de huidige grens tussen de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeente Diemen tot aan het snijpunt van de huidige grens van de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeenten Diemen en Amsterdam. C. Grens met Amsterdam Vanaf het onder B laatstgenoemde snijpunt volgt de nieuwe grens de huidige grens tussen de op te heffen gemeente Muiden en de gemeente Amsterdam tot aan het snijpunt van de huidige grens van de op te heffen gemeenten Muiden en Amsterdam en de gemeente Waterland en de gemeente Almere.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Markermeer-Ijmeer, the Netherlands: Emerging Contextualisation and Governance Complexity
    Case Study Markermeer-IJmeer, the Netherlands: Emerging Contextualisation and Governance Complexity Bas Waterhout Wil Zonneveld Erik Louw CONTEXT REPORT 5 To cite this report: Bas Waterhout, Wil Zonneveld & Erik Louw (2013) Case Study Markermeer- IJmeer, the Netherlands: Emerging Contextualisation and Governance Complexity. CONTEXT Re- port 5. AISSR programme group Urban Planning, Amsterdam. ISBN 978-90-78862-07-9 Layout by WAT ontwerpers, Utrecht Published by AISSR programme group Urban Planning, Amsterdam © 2013 Bas Waterhout, Wil Zonneveld & Erik Louw. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the proprietor. 2 Case Study Markermeer-IJmeer, the Netherlands Case Study Markermeer-IJmeer, the Netherlands: Emerging Contextualisation and Governance Complexity Bas Waterhout Wil Zonneveld Erik Louw Case Study Markermeer-IJmeer, the Netherlands 3 CONTEXT CONTEXT is the acronym for ‘The Innovative Potential of Contextualis- ing Legal Norms in Governance Processes: The Case of Sustainable Area Development’. The research is funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant number 438-11-006. Principal Investigator Prof. Willem Salet Chair programme group Urban Planning University of Amsterdam Scientific Partners University of Amsterdam (Centre for Urban Studies), the Netherlands Prof. Willem Salet, Dr. Jochem de Vries, Dr. Sebastian Dembski TU Delft (OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment), the Netherlands Prof. Wil Zonneveld, Dr. Bas Waterhout, Dr. Erik Louw Utrecht University (Centre for Environmental Law and Policy/NILOS), the Netherlands Prof. Marleen van Rijswick, Dr. Anoeska Buijze Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (LATTS), France Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers
    Working Papers of The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project Lester M. Salamon, Director Helmut K. Anheier, Associate Director HISTORY OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR IN THE NETHERLANDS Vic Veldheer and Ary Burger Social and Cultural Planning Office 1999 Suggested form of citation: Veldheer, Vic and Ary Burger. “History of the Nonprofit Sector in the Netherlands.” Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 35, edited by Lester M. Salamon and Helmut K. Anheier. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, 1999. ISBN 1-886333-41-6 © The Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies, 1999 All Rights Reserved Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project Institute for Policy Studies Center for Civil Society Studies The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21218 U.S.A. The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies (CCSS) seeks to encourage the development and effective operation of not-for-profit, philanthropic, or “civil society” organizations that provide organized vehicles for the exercise of private initiative in the common good, often in collaboration with government and the business sector. CCSS is part of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies and carries out its work internationally through a combination of research, training, and information- sharing. PREFACE This is one in a series of Working Papers produced under the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, a collaborative effort by scholars around the world to understand the scope, structure, and role of the nonprofit sector using a common framework and approach. Begun in 1989 in 13 countries, the Project continues to expand, currently encompassing about 40 countries.
    [Show full text]