Prediction of Liquid Viscosity for N-Alkanes, N-Alcohols I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prediction of Liquid Viscosity for N-Alkanes, N-Alcohols I PREDICTION OF LIQUID VISCOSITY FOR N-ALKANES, N-ALCOHOLS I AND N-ALKANONES By Daniel Hao phen Bachelor of Science in Engineering National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan, China 1970 Master of Science in Engineering National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan, China 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 1981 '-thesis )q$?\ D ¢~115 p t.o~ I:).- PREDICTION OF LIQUID VISCOSITY FOR N-ALKANES, N-ALCOHOLS, AND N-ALKANONES Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii 1110766 PREFACE This study is concerned with the development of a new liquid vis- cosity prediction method. The proposed method is capable of predicting \ liquid viscosity over a wide range of temperatures and a wide range of chain lengths. The Cox equation for viscosity is used as a liquid vis- ~osity-temperature working equation. A new type of group-contribution technique, which is essential to the success of this method, is also developed. This prediction method has been tested for three homologous series, and the results indicate that the present method is better than any other currently existing method. Several extensions of the present method appear to be promising; I sincerely hope that the continuations of this study will be successful. I wish to express my deepest appreciation to my major adviser, Dr. Robert N. Maddox, for his intelligent guidance and invaluable assistance throughout this study. I am also very grateful to the other committee members, Dr. John H. Erbar, Dr. Robert L. Robinson, Jr., and Dr. Gilbert J. Mains for their assistance and advisement in the course of this work. My special thanks are due to Dr. Ruth C. Erbar for her kind help in providing pertinent literature data. Also the assistance from Dr. J.P. Chandler in the use of Marquardt's subroutine is highly appreciated. The help provided by all the faculty, staff and graduate students of the School of Chemical Engineering is acknowledged, Thanks are also extended to the University Computer Center of Oklahoma State University for the facility and computer time offered. iii Finally, I want to express my deep gratitude to my parents Chian­ Trun and Yu-Tsen Chen, my brothers, and sisters for their constant support and sacrifices during the long way of my graduate study. Above all, I wish to thank my wife Julie for her understanding, encouragement, and sustaining help. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW • 1 Historical Background • • • • • 1 Prediction Methods in the Literature 3 Proposed Prediction Method • • • • • • 6 II. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS • • • • . 8 The Cox Vapor-Pressure Equation • • • • • • • • 8 The Cox Equation for Viscosity • • • • . • • • 9 New Group-Contribution Technique . • • • • • 10 Effect of the Functional Group Position • 14 A Special Case • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 16 III • RESULTS AND COMP ARI SONS WITH OTHER METHODS • • • • • • • 18 Regression Procedure • • • • • • • • 18 Summary of the Computed Results . 18 Extrapolation Tests . • • . • 22 Comparisons with Other Methods 26 IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31 Conclusions • • • 31 Recommendations • 32 BIBLI<X;.RAPHY 33 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Results of n-Alkane Liquid Viscosity Correlation and Prediction • • • . 19 II. Results of n-Alcohol Liquid Viscosity Correlation and Prediction • • • . • . 20 III. Results of n-Alkanone Liquid Viscosity Correlation and Prediction • • • • . 21 IV. Predictive Constants for the n-Alkane Series 23 V. Summary of Ext:rapolated Predictions 25 VI. Full Temperature Range Comparison of All Methods • • • • • 27 VII. Low-Temperature Range Comparison • 28 VIII. High-Tempe:rature Range Comparison 29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Contribution of nth Methylene (or Methyl) Group to Natu:ral Logarithm of Liquid Viscosity at T ,55 r = for n-Alkanes . 11 2. Dependence of F on the Number of Carbon Atoms n in n-Alkanes . 13 3, Illustration of the Functional Group Contribution as a Function of the Number of Carpo~ Atoms • • 15 4. Illust:ration of the Functional Group Contribution with Functional Group Position Effect and Constant Decay Ratio . , . , , , . , , , , , , , 17 vi NOMENCLATURE A constant in Equations (1-i), (1-2), (1-10), (2-3) constants in Equation (1-11) A' constant in Equation (2-1) parameters in the Cox equation for vi$cosity, Equations (1-17), (2-3)' (2-4) ao ' ' a1 ' , a2 ' parameters in Equation (2-1) ao* ' al* ,* a2 constants in Equation (2-2) a parameter in Equations (2-5), (2-6); predictive constant in n-alkane series para.meter in Equations. (2-7), (2-10) predictive constant corresponding to a functional group AAPE average absolute percent error AAPE the average of AAPE''8 defined m by Equation (3-3) B constant in Equations (1-1), (1-2), (1-3) b,B. correction term in Equation (1-9) J. constant in Equation (1-12) parameter defined by Equations (1-7), (1-8) parameter in Equations (2-5), (2-6) parameter in Equations (2-?), (2-10) predictive constant corresponding to a functional group c constant in Equation (1-2) calc. calculated liquid viscosity d liquid density at 20° C, g/cm3 vii E percent error defined by Equation (J-1) the absolute value of percent error exp. experimental liquid viscosity EXPD AAPE for a compound outside the range of regression percent error caused by each additional carbon atom beyond m AAPE for compounds inside the range of fitting F fitted value for a certain parameter, a function of n n M molecular weight m number of carbon atoms of a compound member up to which the regression is perfonned MC number of carbon atoms in the carbon chain n, N number of carbon atoms in a.compound. n used in _gth methylene (or methyl) group N* equivalent chain length defined by Equation (1-4) structural or functional group correction in Equation (1-4) upper and lower bound of the n range NCPD number of compounds in a certain sample NPT number of data points for a certain compound p vapor pressure in Equations (2-1), (2-2), atm p critical pressure c position where the functional group occurs r decay ratio parameter in Equation (2-7) temperature, K relative temperature defined in Equation (1-17) viii T* parameter in Equation (1-3), defined by Equation (1-5), (1-6) T critical temperature, K c TMPE temperature where maximum percent error occurs T reduced temperature r Tb nor.mal boiling point, K TO reference temperature, K Y'/L liquid viscosity, cP A. predictive constant for functional group position effect /Ao reference viscosity, mPa s f- liquid viscosity, mPa s 5 parameter defined by Equation (1-13) 5f relative position of a functional group <f ~ )(0) a quantity defined by Equation (1-15) <J1- 5) (1) a quantity defined by Equation (1-16) UJ acentric factor Alnf difference of natural logarithmic liquid viscosity between two neighboring members of the n-alkane series ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW A new method for predicting liquid dynamic (absolute) viscosity of nonnal alkanes, nonnal alcohols, and nonnal alkanones over a wide range of temperatures and a wide range of carbon chain lengths has been deve­ loped. Also a new type of group-contribution technique which involves the use of the geometric series is proposed to generate the predictive parameters in the working equation. No other physical properties are required in this prediction method. The only information needed is the structure of that compound. The new method can predict (also correlate) liquid viscosity more accurately than any other existing method for all three compound series. Historical Background While the mechanism or theory of gas viscosity has met with some success by the application of the kinetic theory of gases, the develop­ ment of the theoretical foundation of liquid viscosity is still in the primitive stage. So far there is no theory which can reduce to a simple function fonn and allow liquid viscosities to be estimated adequately with resonable effort. Therefore, empirical methods are used in all practical situations. These methods allow parameters or certain theore­ tical constants to be approximated from structure or other physical pro­ perties through study of experimental data. The best known correlation for showing the effect of temperature 1 2 _ on liquid viscosity is the De Guzman-Andrade equation r = A eXJ?(B/T) (1-1) where A and B are positive constants. This equation was proposed by De Guzman (1913) and then suggested by Andra.de (1930) from an analysis of the theory of liquid viscosity. It holds fairly well over a temperature range from somewhat above the normal boiling point to near the freezing point. Because of its simplicity, this equation has been the basis of many empirical prediction methods. However, it often fails at low tern- peratures as the freezing point is approached; also, it is not suitable for reduced temperatures above 0.75. One variation of equation (1-1), which resembles the Antoine equation, was proposed by Gutman and Simmons (1952) .. ln µ = A + B/( T + C) (1-2) where A, B, Care constants. Although this modification has been shown to be quite accurate at low temperatures, it is not particularly good for the high temperature region (Reid et al., 1977). Above the normal boiling point, the correlations commonly used are no longer liquid viscosity-temperature equations. The correlations of Letsou and Stiel (1973), for example, are of a corresponding-states type. The prediction methods for low temperatures based on the viscosity- temperature equation are mainly structural in nature, whereas the predic- tion methods for high temperatures are not. Because of this difference in approaches, one can hardly eXJ?ect good matches from these two different types of estimation methods in the connection region (around reduced tem-- perature Tr = .75).
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Physico of Liquid
    MD Simulation of Liquid Pentane Isomers Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1999, Vol. 20, No. 8 897 Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Physico Chemical Properties of Liquid Pentane Isomers Seng Kue Lee and Song Hi Lee* Department of Chemistry, Kyungsung University, Pusan 608-736, Korea Received January 15, 1999 We have presented the thermodynamic, structural and dynamic properties of liquid pentane isomers - normal pentane, isopentane, and neopentane - using an expanded collapsed atomic model. The thermodynamic prop­ erties show that the intermolecular interactions become weaker as the molecular shape becomes more nearly spherical and the surface area decreases with branching. The structural properties are well predicted from the site-site radial, the average end-to-end distance, and the root-mean-squared radius of gyration distribution func­ tions. The dynamic properties are obtained from the time correlation functions - the mean square displacement (MSD), the velocity auto-correlation (VAC), the cosine (CAC), the stress (SAC), the pressure (PAC), and the heat flux auto-correlation (HFAC) functions - of liquid pentane isomers. Two self-diffusion coefficients of liq­ uid pentane isomers calculated from the MSD's via the Einstein equation and the VAC's via the Green-Kubo relation show the same trend but do not coincide with the branching effect on self-diffusion. The rotational re­ laxation time of liquid pentane isomers obtained from the CAC's decreases monotonously as branching increas­ es. Two kinds of viscosities of liquid pentane isomers calculated from the SAC and PAC functions via the Green-Kubo relation have the same trend compared with the experimental results. The thermal conductivity calculated from the HFAC increases as branching increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Higher Alkanes Using NO Chemical Ionization in PTR-Tof-MS
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14123–14138, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14123-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Measurements of higher alkanes using NOC chemical ionization in PTR-ToF-MS: important contributions of higher alkanes to secondary organic aerosols in China Chaomin Wang1,2, Bin Yuan1,2, Caihong Wu1,2, Sihang Wang1,2, Jipeng Qi1,2, Baolin Wang3, Zelong Wang1,2, Weiwei Hu4, Wei Chen4, Chenshuo Ye5, Wenjie Wang5, Yele Sun6, Chen Wang3, Shan Huang1,2, Wei Song4, Xinming Wang4, Suxia Yang1,2, Shenyang Zhang1,2, Wanyun Xu7, Nan Ma1,2, Zhanyi Zhang1,2, Bin Jiang1,2, Hang Su8, Yafang Cheng8, Xuemei Wang1,2, and Min Shao1,2 1Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, 511443 Guangzhou, China 2Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, 511443 Guangzhou, China 3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), 250353 Jinan, China 4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China 5State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China 6State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition Of
    Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Diesel Exhaust Using Parameterized and Semi-explicit Chemistry and Thermodynamic Models Sailaja Eluri1, Christopher D. Cappa2, Beth Friedman3, Delphine K. Farmer3, and Shantanu H. Jathar1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA, 95616 3 Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 Correspondence to: Shantanu H. Jathar ([email protected]) Table S1: Mass speciation and kOH for VOC emissions profile #3161 3 -1 - Species Name kOH (cm molecules s Mass Percent (%) 1) (1-methylpropyl) benzene 8.50×10'() 0.023 (2-methylpropyl) benzene 8.71×10'() 0.060 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene 3.27×10'(( 0.056 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 3.25×10'(( 0.246 1,2-diethylbenzene 8.11×10'() 0.042 1,2-propadiene 9.82×10'() 0.218 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 5.67×10'(( 0.088 1,3-butadiene 6.66×10'(( 0.088 1-butene 3.14×10'(( 0.311 1-methyl-2-ethylbenzene 7.44×10'() 0.065 1-methyl-3-ethylbenzene 1.39×10'(( 0.116 1-pentene 3.14×10'(( 0.148 2,2,4-trimethylpentane 3.34×10'() 0.139 2,2-dimethylbutane 2.23×10'() 0.028 2,3,4-trimethylpentane 6.60×10'() 0.009 2,3-dimethyl-1-butene 5.38×10'(( 0.014 2,3-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.005 2,3-dimethylpentane 7.14×10'() 0.032 2,4-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.019 2,4-dimethylpentane 4.77×10'() 0.009 2-methylheptane 8.28×10'() 0.028 2-methylhexane 6.86×10'()
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This Journal Is © the Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Supplementary Material Guest-controlled Self-Sorting in Assemblies driven by the Hydrophobic Effect Haiying Gan, Bruce C. Gibb* Department of Chemistry University of New Orleans LA 70148 Email: [email protected] S1 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Table of Contents General p S3 1H-NMR spectra of 1 and 2, and mixture of hosts, in the absence of guests p S4 1H-NMR spectra of the complexes of 1.2 and hydrocarbons n-pentane through n-heptadecane p S5-S8 Example COSY and NOESY NMR data (for n-undecane hetero-complex) p S9 Pulse-gradient stimulated spin-echo NMR studies p S11 Table of Percentage of Hetero-complex Formation p S12 References p S13 S2 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Experimental section General All reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company and used as received without further purification. Host 1 and 2 were synthesized as previously reported.1,2 NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Inova 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported relative to D2O (4.80 ppm). Endo Me c O O O O O O O O O O g O O g O O O d O d HO O HO O HO f O OH OH HO f O OH OH O b O O b O H H H H H H H H O e O e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O j j H H a H H H Ha H H m l m l HO O HO O O OH O OH HO O HO O O OH O OH 1 2 S3 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 1H-NMR spectra of host 1, 2 and mixture of hosts in the absence of guests Figure S1: 1H NMR spectra of: 1) 1 mM of 1; 2) 1 mM of 2; 3) 0.5 mM of both 1 and 2 (all 10 mM sodium tetraborate solution).
    [Show full text]
  • Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the N-Alkanes from 2 C21 to C30 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography
    BATCH: je1a04 USER: jeh69 DIV: @xyv04/data1/CLS_pj/GRP_je/JOB_i01/DIV_je0301747 DATE: October 17, 2003 1 Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the n-Alkanes from 2 C21 to C30 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography 3 James S. Chickos* and William Hanshaw 4 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of MissourisSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 5 6 The temperature dependence of gas chromatographic retention times for n-heptadecane to n-triacontane 7 is reported. These data are used to evaluate the vaporization enthalpies of these compounds at T ) 298.15 8 K, and a protocol is described that provides vapor pressures of these n-alkanes from T ) 298.15 to 575 9 K. The vapor pressure and vaporization enthalpy results obtained are compared with existing literature 10 data where possible and found to be internally consistent. Sublimation enthalpies for n-C17 to n-C30 are 11 calculated by combining vaporization enthalpies with fusion enthalpies and are compared when possible 12 to direct measurements. 13 14 Introduction 15 The n-alkanes serve as excellent standards for the 16 measurement of vaporization enthalpies of hydrocarbons.1,2 17 Recently, the vaporization enthalpies of the n-alkanes 18 reported in the literature were examined and experimental 19 values were selected on the basis of how well their 20 vaporization enthalpies correlated with their enthalpies of 21 transfer from solution to the gas phase as measured by gas 22 chromatography.3 A plot of the vaporization enthalpies of 23 the n-alkanes as a function of the number of carbon atoms 24 is given in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Chemical Names and Alternatives, Abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers
    Table 2. Chemical names and alternatives, abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers. [Final list compiled according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Web site (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/); NIST Standard Reference Database No. 69, June 2005 release, last accessed May 9, 2008. CAS, Chemical Abstracts Service. This report contains CAS Registry Numbers®, which is a Registered Trademark of the American Chemical Society. CAS recommends the verification of the CASRNs through CAS Client ServicesSM] Aliphatic hydrocarbons CAS registry number Some alternative names n-decane 124-18-5 n-undecane 1120-21-4 n-dodecane 112-40-3 n-tridecane 629-50-5 n-tetradecane 629-59-4 n-pentadecane 629-62-9 n-hexadecane 544-76-3 n-heptadecane 629-78-7 pristane 1921-70-6 n-octadecane 593-45-3 phytane 638-36-8 n-nonadecane 629-92-5 n-eicosane 112-95-8 n-Icosane n-heneicosane 629-94-7 n-Henicosane n-docosane 629-97-0 n-tricosane 638-67-5 n-tetracosane 643-31-1 n-pentacosane 629-99-2 n-hexacosane 630-01-3 n-heptacosane 593-49-7 n-octacosane 630-02-4 n-nonacosane 630-03-5 n-triacontane 638-68-6 n-hentriacontane 630-04-6 n-dotriacontane 544-85-4 n-tritriacontane 630-05-7 n-tetratriacontane 14167-59-0 Table 2. Chemical names and alternatives, abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers.—Continued [Final list compiled according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Web site (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/); NIST Standard Reference Database No.
    [Show full text]
  • LE Hatch, W. Luo, JF Pankow, RJ Yokelson 2, CE Stockwell 2, and KC Barsanti
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 23237–23307, 2014 www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/14/23237/2014/ doi:10.5194/acpd-14-23237-2014 ACPD © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 14, 23237–23307, 2014 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry Identification of and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. NMOCs in biomass burning smoke Identification and quantification of L. E. Hatch et al. gaseous organic compounds emitted from biomass burning using Title Page Abstract Introduction two-dimensional gas Conclusions References chromatography/time-of-flight mass Tables Figures spectrometry J I L. E. Hatch1, W. Luo1, J. F. Pankow1, R. J. Yokelson2, C. E. Stockwell2, and J I 1 K. C. Barsanti Back Close 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Full Screen / Esc Oregon 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana Printer-friendly Version Received: 15 August 2014 – Accepted: 19 August 2014 – Published: 10 September 2014 Interactive Discussion Correspondence to: K. C. Barsanti ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 23237 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract ACPD The current understanding of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation within biomass burning (BB) plumes is limited by the incomplete identification and quan- 14, 23237–23307, 2014 tification of the non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) emitted from such fires. 5 Gaseous organic compounds were collected on sorbent cartridges during labora- Identification of tory burns as part of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment (FLAME-4), with NMOCs in biomass analysis by two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry burning smoke (GC × GC/TOFMS).
    [Show full text]
  • N-Alkane Category: Decane, Undecane, Dodecane (CAS Nos
    June 17, 2004 n-Alkane Category: decane, undecane, dodecane (CAS Nos. 124-18-5, 1120-21-4, 112-40-3) Voluntary Children’s Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission Docket Number OPPTS – 00274D American Chemistry Council n-Alkane VCCEP Consortium Sponsors: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Sasol North America Inc. Shell Chemical LP June 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary of Terms 4 1. Executive Summary 5 2. Basis for Inclusion in the VCCEP Program 2.1 Total Exposure Assessment Methodology Data 10 2.2 Air Monitoring Data 11 2.3 How Sponsors Were Identified for the n-Alkane VCCEP Effort 12 3. Previous and On-Going Health Assessments 3.1 OECD SIDS/ICCA HPV Imitative 14 3.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group 15 3.3 Hydrocarbon Solvent Guidance Group Values (GGVs) for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) for Hydrocarbon Solvents 15 4. Regulatory Overview 4.1 CPSC Child-Resistant Packaging for Hydrocarbons 16 4.2 Occupational Exposure Limits 16 4.3 VOC Regulations 17 5. Product Overview 5.1 Physical, Chemical, and Environmental Fate Properties 18 5.2 Production of n-Alkanes 20 5.3 Uses for n-Alkane Products 20 5.4 Petroleum Products Which Contain n-Alkanes 21 6. Exposure Assessment 6.1 Summary 25 6.2 Non-Occupational Exposure 28 6.2.1 Indoor Sources of Exposure 6.2.2 Outdoor Source of Exposure 6.2.3 Unique Children’s Exposure 6.3 Integrated 24 hour Exposure 36 6.4 Occupational Exposure 36 6.5 Potential for Dermal and Oral Exposure 40 6.6 Selection of Exposure Scenarios and Exposure Concentrations 43 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomona Oaks Exposure Assessment
    POMONA OAKS EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Volatile Organics in Well Water and Indoor Air Environmental Health Program Division of Epidemiology and Disease Control New Jersey State Department of Health October TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations List of Tables Acknowiedgem ents SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Volatile Organics in the Community 1.2. Benzene - A Contaminant of Particular Concern 1.3. Initiation of Investigation 1.*. Study Objectives 1.5. Description of Population Studied SECTION 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Pilot Study 2.1.a. Study Design 2.1.b. Sample Selection and Participation 2.I.e. Data Collection and Laboratory Analysis 2.1.d. Data Management and Statistical Methods 2.2. Full Scale Study 2.2.a. Study Design 2.2.b.. Sample Selection and Participation 2.5.C. Data Collection and Laboratory Analysis 2.2.d. Data Management and Statistical Methods 2.3 Follow-up Study 2.3.a. Study Design 2.3.b. Sample Selection and Participation 2.3.C. Data Collection and Laboratory Analysis 2.3.d. Data Management and Statistical Methods 2A Methods of Communication SECTION 3. RESULTS 3.1. Pilot Study Results 3.1.a. Sample Studied 3.1.b. Exposures 3.1.c. Response 3.1.d. Exposure-Response Relationship TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 3.2. Full Scale Study Results 3.2.a. Sample Studied 3.2.b. Exposures 3.2.C. Response 3.2.d. Exposure-Response Relationship 3.3. Follow-up Study Results 3.3.a. Sample Studied 3.3.b. Exposures 3.3.C. Risk Assessment SECTION 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Pilot Study 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalysis Science & Technology
    Catalysis Science & Technology Accepted Manuscript This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains. www.rsc.org/catalysis Page 1 of 12 Catalysis Science & Technology 1 Cu, Al and Ga based metal organic framework catalysts for the decarboxylation of oleic acid L. Yang, G. L. Ruess, M.A. Carreon * Keywords: metal organic frameworks,decarboxylation, fuel hydrocarbons Manuscript Abstract Herein we demonstrate the catalytic decarboxylation and conversion of oleic acid to paraffins, and hydrocarbons over bare and Pt supported Cu, Al and Ga based metal organic frameworks. Moderate degree of decarboxylation were observed for all metal organic framework catalysts. The incorporation of Pt with the porous frameworks resulted in high degrees of decarboxylation. All MOF catalysts showed high thermal stability, resulting in recyclable catalysts displaying low catalytic activity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTM D2887 Boiling Range Distribution of Petroleum Fractions by GC
    Visit us at accustandard.com ASTM D2887 Boiling Range Distribution of Petroleum Fractions by GC Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (C8 - C20) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (C8 - C30) TPH-LOW-01 $ 50 / 1 x 1 mL TPH-MID-01 $ 65 / 1 x 1 mL TPH-LOW-01-PAK SAVE 20% $ 200 / 5 x 1 mL TPH-MID-01-PAK SAVE 20% $ 260 / 5 x 1 mL 500 µg/mL each in Chloroform 13 comps. 500 µg/mL each in Chloroform 25 comps. n-Octane n-Pentadecane UPDATED n-Octane n-Heptadecane n-Tricosane UPDATED n-Nonane n-Hexadecane n-Nonane n-Octadecane n-Tetracosane n-Decane n-Heptadecane n-Decane Pristane n-Pentacosane n-Undecane n-Octadecane n-Undecane n-Nonadecane n-Hexacosane n-Dodecane n-Nonadecane n-Dodecane Phytane n-Heptacosane n-Tridecane n-Eicosane n-Tridecane n-Eicosane n-Octacosane n-Tetradecane n-Tetradecane n-Heneicosane n-Nonacosane n-Pentadecane n-Docosane n-Triacontane n-Hexadecane Calibration Mixture (C6 - C44) Hydrocarbon Window Defining Standard (C8 - C40) DRH-002N $ 30 / 100 mg DRH-008S-R2 $ 65 / 1 x 1 mL DRH-002N-10X $ 40 / 1 gm DRH-008S-R2-PAK SAVE 20% $ 260 / 5 x 1 mL At stated Wt.% 17 comps. 500 µg/mL each in Chloroform 35 comps. n-Hexane 6 n-Octadecane 5 n-Octane n-Nonadecane n-Triacontane n-Heptane 6 n-Eicosane 2 n-Nonane Phytane n-Hentriacontane n-Octane 8 n-Tetracosane 2 n-Decane n-Eicosane n-Dotriacontane n-Nonane 8 n-Octacosane 1 n-Undecane n-Heneicosane n-Tritriacontane n-Decane 12 n-Dotriacontane 1 n-Dodecane n-Docosane n-Tetratriacontane n-Undecane 12 n-Hexatriacontane 1 n-Tridecane n-Tricosane n-Pentatriacontane n-Dodecane 12 n-Tetracontane 1 n-Tetradecane n-Tetracosane n-Hexatriacontane n-Tetradecane 12 n-Tetratetracontane 1 n-Pentadecane n-Pentacosane n-Heptatriacontane n-Hexadecane 10 n-Hexadecane n-Hexacosane n-Octatriacontane n-Heptadecane n-Heptacosane n-Nonatriacontane n-Octadecane n-Octacosane n-Tetracontane Calibration Solution (C6 - C44) DRH-002S-R1 $ 50 / 1 x 1 mL Pristane n-Nonacosane DRH-002S-R1-PAK SAVE 20% $ 200 / 5 x 1 mL At stated conc.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Flammable Liquid Mixture: Docosane / Dodecane / Eicosane / Hexadecane / N- Decane / N-Heptadecane / N-Nonane / N-Octadecane / N-Pentadecane / Tetracosane / Tetradecane / Undecane Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Flammable Liquid Mixture: Docosane / Dodecane / Eicosane / Hexadecane / N-Decane / N-Heptadecane / N-Nonane / N-Octadecane / N-Pentadecane / Tetracosane / Tetradecane / Undecane Other means of : Not available. identification Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 018510 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS - Category 1 substance or mixture SKIN CORROSION/IRRITATION - Category 2 SERIOUS EYE DAMAGE/ EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (SINGLE EXPOSURE) (Respiratory tract irritation) - Category 3 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (SINGLE EXPOSURE) (Narcotic effects) - Category 3 AQUATIC HAZARD (LONG-TERM) - Category 2 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Extremely flammable liquid and vapor. May form explosive mixtures in Air. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. May cause drowsiness and dizziness. Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. Precautionary statements General : Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Prevention : Wear protective gloves. Wear eye or face protection. Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking. Use explosion- proof electrical, ventilating, lighting and all material-handling equipment.
    [Show full text]