DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Vijayaragavan Finaldraft.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Vijayaragavan Finaldraft.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Energy and Geo-Environmental Engineering AN EMPIRICAL APPROACH FOR PREDICTING VISCOSITIES OF HYDROCARBON SYSTEMS: DEFINED COMPOUNDS, DIRECT COAL LIQUID OILS AND LIGHT CRUDE OILS A Thesis in Energy and Mineral Engineering by Vijayaragavan Krishnamoorthy 2010 Vijayaragavan Krishnamoorthy Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2010 The thesis of Vijayaragavan Krishnamoorthy was reviewed and approved* by the following: Sharon F. Miller Research Associate at EMS Energy Institute Thesis Advisor Harold H. Schobert Professor of Fuel Science Caroline E. Burgess Clifford Senior Research Associate at EMS Energy Institute Bruce G. Miller Senior Research Associate at EMS Energy Institute R. Larry Grayson Professor of Energy and Mineral Engineering Graduate Program Officer of Energy and Mineral Engineering * Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ABSTRACT A single parameter empirical method, based on the Effective Carbon Number (ECN) concept proposed by Allan and Teja (1991), was modified and extended to predict the viscosities of defined compounds (pure hydrocarbons and their mixtures) and undefined hydrocarbon liquids (petroleum fractions, crude oil, coal liquids, and coal liquid fractions) over a wide range of temperatures, pressures up to 700 bars, and compositions. Two correlations, n-alkane correlation and aromatic correlation, were developed to calculate the ECN for the liquid under investigation. The n-alkane correlation was obtained by correlating viscosity data of normal alkanes to their carbon number, while the aromatic correlation was obtained by correlating viscosity data of selected coal liquid model compounds with their carbon number. The aromatic correlation was used in calculating ECN only in certain cases. Andrade‘s equation [Reid et al (1987)] was used in obtaining the viscosity-temperature relationship. Viscosity-pressure relationships for ECN <12 and ECN ≥12 were obtained from high pressure n-alkane and synthetic crude oil data. Thus, viscosities over a wide range of temperatures and pressures up to 700 bars can be calculated with a single reference viscosity datum. The model thus obtained was tested with viscosity data of 13 pure aromatics, 11 olefins, 28 alicylics, 7 defined hydrocarbon liquid mixtures at low pressures, 8 pure liquid hydrocarbons and mixtures at high pressures, and 53 undefined liquid hydrocarbon mixtures. The overall Average Absolute Error (AAE), which is defined as the average of the percent absolute difference between predicted and experimental viscosity data points, in predicting the viscosities of various categories of liquids was as follows: 6.28% for aromatics, 3.44% for olefins, 4.09% for alicyclics, 2.90% for defined hydrocarbon mixture at low pressure, 3.90% for pure hydrocarbons iii and mixtures at high pressures, 9.99% for coal liquids and 4.69% for crude oil and petroleum fractions. The developed method compared favorably with the Generalized Corresponding State Principle (GCSP); a widely recognized model in predicting the viscosities of coal liquids. Moreover, the developed method was found to compare favorably with the method of Kabadi and Palakkal and the method of Sharma and Goel, for limited coal liquid data points. The distinguishing characteristics of the developed method over the method of Allan and Teja (1991) are their applicability to high pressure data and the prediction of viscosities for heavy coal liquid distillates. Overall, the model has been shown to be a powerful technique in predicting viscosities of defined and undefined compounds (light and middle distillates of coal liquid oils, and light crude oils and fractions) over a wide range of temperatures (253.15-673.15 K) and pressures (1.01-700 bars). However, the developed method should be used with caution when predicting viscosities of heavy distillates at low temperatures (<340 K) and light and middle distillates at very high temperatures (>673.15 K). iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... viii NOMENCLATURE ............................................................................................................. x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ xii Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 01 Chapter 2. Literature Review ................................................................................................. 03 2.1. Semitheoretical Methods ................................................................................. 04 2.1.1. Corresponding States Principle .................................................................... 05 2.1.1.1. Ely and Hanley Method (1981)................................................................ 06 2.1.1.2. Generalized Corresponding States Principle (GCSP) .............................. 09 2.1.1.3. Pedersen Method (1984) .......................................................................... 13 2.1.2. Conclusions of the Semitheoretical Methods .............................................. 15 2.2. Empirical Methods ........................................................................................... 15 2.2.1. Method of Amin and Maddox (1980) .......................................................... 16 2.2.2. Methods of Twu (1985, 1986) ..................................................................... 17 2.2.3. Method of Sharma and Goel (1997) ............................................................ 19 2.2.4. Method of Kabadi and Palakkal (1996) ....................................................... 20 2.2.5. Method of Allan and Teja (1991) ................................................................ 20 2.2.6. Conclusions of the Empirical Methods ........................................................ 22 2.3. Conclusions of the Literature Review.............................................................. 23 Chapter 3. Experimental Methods ......................................................................................... 24 3.1. Coal, Coal Preparation and Solvent Selection ................................................. 24 3.2. Liquefaction Procedure .................................................................................... 25 v 3.3. Boiling Point and Specific Gravity Measurements .......................................... 29 3.4. Viscosity Measurements .................................................................................. 30 Chapter 4. Model Development and Results ......................................................................... 32 4.1. Development of the Viscosity Model .............................................................. 32 4.1.1. Viscosity-Temperature Relationship ........................................................... 32 4.1.2. Viscosity-Pressure Relationship .................................................................. 36 4.1.3. Procedure for Calculating Viscosity using the Developed Method ............. 38 4.1.4. Effectiveness of the Model .......................................................................... 41 4.2. Results .............................................................................................................. 41 4.2.1. Evaluation of the Model to Predict Viscosities of Hydrocarbon Systems ... 43 4.2.1.1. Evaluation of the Model with Defined Compounds ................................ 44 4.2.1.2. Evaluation of the Model with Undefined Compounds (DCLOs) ............ 49 4.2.1.3. Evaluation of the Model with Undefined Compounds (Light Crudes and Fractions)........................................................................................... 53 4.2.3. Summary of the Results ............................................................................... 56 Chapter 5. Comparison with the GCSP Model ...................................................................... 57 Chapter 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................... 61 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 63 Appendix A. Liquefaction Conversion Data, GC-MS Operating Conditions and Compositional Information of Surrogate Coal Liquid Oils ............................. 68 Appendix B. Physical Properties and Viscosity Data of Surrogate Coal Liquid Oils ........... 70 Appendix C. Repeatability Study .......................................................................................... 72 Appendix D. Sample Calculations ......................................................................................... 74 Appendix E. Results of Various Hydrocarbon Systems ........................................................ 76 vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 2.1 Various liquid viscosity models [adapted from Mehrotra et al (1996)] .............. 04 Figure 3.1 Picture of a microreactor used in this work ......................................................... 26 Figure 3.2 Block diagram of the experimental procedure followed in this work ................. 28 Figure 3.3 Picture of a Bohlin Gemini HR Nano rheometer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Confinement Strategy to Prepare N-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Nanoscale. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 Supporting Information A confinement strategy to prepare N-doped reduced graphene oxide foams with desired monolithic structures for supercapacitors Daoqing Liu,a,b,# Qianwei Li, *c,# Si Li, a,b Jinbao Hou,d Huazhang Zhao *a,b a Department of Environmental Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China b The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100871, China c State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, Beijing Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Pollution Control, China University of Petroleum, 18 Fuxue Road, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China d College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China # Co-first author. * Corresponding author. Tel/fax: +86-10-62758748; email address: [email protected] (H.Z. Zhao). S1 Experimental Methods 1. Preparation of graphite oxide (GO) Graphite oxide was prepared from natural graphite (Jinglong Co., Beijing, China) according to 1 a modified Hummers method : 120 mL 98 wt% H2SO4 was poured into a beaker containing a mixture of 5 g natural graphite and 2.5 g NaNO3, and then the mixture was stirred in an ice bath for 30 min. 15 g KMnO4 was added slowly into the mixture, which was allowed to react for 2 h at a temperature no more than 20°C. Then, the temperature was risen to 35°C, and the reaction was performed for another 2 h. After that, the reactant mixture was poured slowly into 360 mL distilled water under violent stirring condition so as to control the temperature no more than 90°C, followed by further reaction at 75°C for 1 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Sections-A, B and C
    Science IX Sample Paper 7 Solved www.rava.org.in CLASS IX (2019-20) SCIENCE (CODE 086) SAMPLE PAPER-7 Time : 3 Hours Maximum Marks : 80 General Instructions : (i) The question paper comprises of three sections-A, B and C. Attempt all the sections. (ii) All questions are compulsory. (iii) Internal choice is given in each sections. (iv) All questions in Section A are one-mark questions comprising MCQ, VSA type and assertion-reason type questions. They are to be answered in one word or in one sentence. (v) All questions in Section B are three-mark, short-answer type questions. These are to be answered in about 50-60 words each. (vi) All questions in Section C are five-mark, long-answer type questions. These are to be answered in about 80-90 words each. (vii) This question paper consists of a total of 30 questions. 6. Who proposed the fluid mosaic model of protoplasm? [1] Section - A (a) Singer and Nicolson (b) Watson and Crick (c) Robert Hook (d) Robert Brown 1. Which of the following actions a force can do? [1] (a) Can move a stationary object. Ans : (a) Singer and Nicolson. (b) Can stop a moving object. or (c) Can change the speed of a moving object. Which of the following are complex tissues? (d) All of the above. (a) Xylem and Phloem Ans : (d) All of the above (b) Collenchyma and Sclerenchyma (c) Parenchyma and Collenchyma 2. Ozone layer protects us from which one of the (d) Xylem and Parenchyma following? [1] (a) X- rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Physico of Liquid
    MD Simulation of Liquid Pentane Isomers Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1999, Vol. 20, No. 8 897 Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Physico Chemical Properties of Liquid Pentane Isomers Seng Kue Lee and Song Hi Lee* Department of Chemistry, Kyungsung University, Pusan 608-736, Korea Received January 15, 1999 We have presented the thermodynamic, structural and dynamic properties of liquid pentane isomers - normal pentane, isopentane, and neopentane - using an expanded collapsed atomic model. The thermodynamic prop­ erties show that the intermolecular interactions become weaker as the molecular shape becomes more nearly spherical and the surface area decreases with branching. The structural properties are well predicted from the site-site radial, the average end-to-end distance, and the root-mean-squared radius of gyration distribution func­ tions. The dynamic properties are obtained from the time correlation functions - the mean square displacement (MSD), the velocity auto-correlation (VAC), the cosine (CAC), the stress (SAC), the pressure (PAC), and the heat flux auto-correlation (HFAC) functions - of liquid pentane isomers. Two self-diffusion coefficients of liq­ uid pentane isomers calculated from the MSD's via the Einstein equation and the VAC's via the Green-Kubo relation show the same trend but do not coincide with the branching effect on self-diffusion. The rotational re­ laxation time of liquid pentane isomers obtained from the CAC's decreases monotonously as branching increas­ es. Two kinds of viscosities of liquid pentane isomers calculated from the SAC and PAC functions via the Green-Kubo relation have the same trend compared with the experimental results. The thermal conductivity calculated from the HFAC increases as branching increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting Materials
    California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Synthetic Turf Study Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019 MEETING MATERIALS THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency Agenda Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019, 9:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 1001 I Street, CalEPA Headquarters Building, Sacramento Byron Sher Auditorium The agenda for this meeting is given below. The order of items on the agenda is provided for general reference only. The order in which items are taken up by the Panel is subject to change. 1. Welcome and Opening Remarks 2. Synthetic Turf and Playground Studies Overview 4. Synthetic Turf Field Exposure Model Exposure Equations Exposure Parameters 3. Non-Targeted Chemical Analysis Volatile Organics on Synthetic Turf Fields Non-Polar Organics Constituents in Crumb Rubber Polar Organic Constituents in Crumb Rubber 5. Public Comments: For members of the public attending in-person: Comments will be limited to three minutes per commenter. For members of the public attending via the internet: Comments may be sent via email to [email protected]. Email comments will be read aloud, up to three minutes each, by staff of OEHHA during the public comment period, as time allows. 6. Further Panel Discussion and Closing Remarks 7. Wrap Up and Adjournment Agenda Synthetic Turf Advisory Panel Meeting May 31, 2019 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DRAFT for Discussion at May 2019 SAP Meeting. Table of Contents Synthetic Turf and Playground Studies Overview May 2019 Update .....
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitation of Hydrocarbons in Vehicle Exhaust and Ambient Air
    QUANTITATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN VEHICLE EXHAUST AND AMBIENT AIR by Randall Bramston-Cook Lotus Consulting 5781 Campo Walk, Long Beach, California 90803 Presented at EPA Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants Conference, Cary, North Caolina, September 1, 1998 Copyright 1998 Lotus Flower, Inc. QUANTITATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN VEHICLE EXHAUST AND AMBIENT AIR Randall Bramston-Cook Lotus Consulting 5781 Campo Walk, Long Beach, California 90803 ABSTRACT Ironically, one of the most complex analyses in gas chromatography involves the simplest computation to generate concentrations. The difficult determination of hydrocarbons in vehicle exhaust and ambient air involves separation of over 200 compounds, requires cryogenic concentration to bring expected concentrations into a detectable range, and mandates usage of multiple columns and intricate valving. Yet, quantitation of these hydrocarbons can be calibrated with only one or two component standards and a simple mathematical operation. Requirements for meeting this goal include: (1) even detector responses for all hydrocarbons from ethane to n-tridecane (including olefins and aromatics), (2) accurate and reproducible measure of the sample injection volumes, (3) maximizing trap, column and detector performances, and (4) minimizing sample carry-over. Importance of these factors and how they can be implemented in routine measurements are presented with examples from vehicle exhaust and ambient air analyses. TEXT Hydrocarbons remain a major pollutant in our atmosphere. Much of the problem generated is from incomplete combustion and unburned fuel in vehicle exhaust. Accurate measure of atmospheric and exhaust levels for hydrocarbons is on-going in many facilities in the world. This analysis is undoubtedly one of the most complex in chromatography due to large number of individual hydrocarbon components found, the low levels required to be measured, and high concentrations of potential inferences to the measuring process.
    [Show full text]
  • Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the N-Alkanes from C31 to C38 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography
    BATCH: je3a29 USER: ckt69 DIV: @xyv04/data1/CLS_pj/GRP_je/JOB_i03/DIV_je030236t DATE: March 15, 2004 1 Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the n-Alkanes from 2 C31 to C38 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography 3 James S. Chickos* and William Hanshaw 4 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of MissourisSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121, USA 5 6 The temperature dependence of gas-chromatographic retention times for henitriacontane to octatriacontane 7 is reported. These data are used in combination with other literature values to evaluate the vaporization 8 enthalpies and vapor pressures of these n-alkanes from T ) 298.15 to 575 K. The vapor pressure and 9 vaporization enthalpy results obtained are compared with existing literature data where possible and 10 found to be internally consistent. The vaporization enthalpies and vapor pressures obtained for the 11 n-alkanes are also tested directly and through the use of thermochemical cycles using literature values 12 for several polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Sublimation enthalpies are also calculated for hentriacontane to 13 octatriacontane by combining vaporization enthalpies with temperature adjusted fusion enthalpies. 14 15 Introduction vaporization enthalpies of C21 to C30 to include C31 to C38. 54 The vapor pressures and vaporization enthalpies of these 55 16 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are important larger n-alkanes have been evaluated using the technique 56 17 environmental contaminants, many of which exhibit very of correlation gas chromatography. This technique relies 57 18 low vapor pressures. In the gas phase, they exist mainly entirely on the use of standards in assessment. Standards 58 19 sorbed to aerosol particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Higher Alkanes Using NO Chemical Ionization in PTR-Tof-MS
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14123–14138, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14123-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Measurements of higher alkanes using NOC chemical ionization in PTR-ToF-MS: important contributions of higher alkanes to secondary organic aerosols in China Chaomin Wang1,2, Bin Yuan1,2, Caihong Wu1,2, Sihang Wang1,2, Jipeng Qi1,2, Baolin Wang3, Zelong Wang1,2, Weiwei Hu4, Wei Chen4, Chenshuo Ye5, Wenjie Wang5, Yele Sun6, Chen Wang3, Shan Huang1,2, Wei Song4, Xinming Wang4, Suxia Yang1,2, Shenyang Zhang1,2, Wanyun Xu7, Nan Ma1,2, Zhanyi Zhang1,2, Bin Jiang1,2, Hang Su8, Yafang Cheng8, Xuemei Wang1,2, and Min Shao1,2 1Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, 511443 Guangzhou, China 2Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, 511443 Guangzhou, China 3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), 250353 Jinan, China 4State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China 5State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China 6State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition Of
    Supporting Information for Modeling the Formation and Composition of Secondary Organic Aerosol from Diesel Exhaust Using Parameterized and Semi-explicit Chemistry and Thermodynamic Models Sailaja Eluri1, Christopher D. Cappa2, Beth Friedman3, Delphine K. Farmer3, and Shantanu H. Jathar1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA, 95616 3 Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523 Correspondence to: Shantanu H. Jathar ([email protected]) Table S1: Mass speciation and kOH for VOC emissions profile #3161 3 -1 - Species Name kOH (cm molecules s Mass Percent (%) 1) (1-methylpropyl) benzene 8.50×10'() 0.023 (2-methylpropyl) benzene 8.71×10'() 0.060 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene 3.27×10'(( 0.056 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 3.25×10'(( 0.246 1,2-diethylbenzene 8.11×10'() 0.042 1,2-propadiene 9.82×10'() 0.218 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 5.67×10'(( 0.088 1,3-butadiene 6.66×10'(( 0.088 1-butene 3.14×10'(( 0.311 1-methyl-2-ethylbenzene 7.44×10'() 0.065 1-methyl-3-ethylbenzene 1.39×10'(( 0.116 1-pentene 3.14×10'(( 0.148 2,2,4-trimethylpentane 3.34×10'() 0.139 2,2-dimethylbutane 2.23×10'() 0.028 2,3,4-trimethylpentane 6.60×10'() 0.009 2,3-dimethyl-1-butene 5.38×10'(( 0.014 2,3-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.005 2,3-dimethylpentane 7.14×10'() 0.032 2,4-dimethylhexane 8.55×10'() 0.019 2,4-dimethylpentane 4.77×10'() 0.009 2-methylheptane 8.28×10'() 0.028 2-methylhexane 6.86×10'()
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Flammable Liquid Mixture: Docosane / Dodecane / Hexadecane / Hexane / N-Decane / N-Heptane / N-Nonane / N-Octadecane / N-Octane / N-Tridecane / Octacosane / Tetracosane / Tetradecane / Tricontane Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Flammable Liquid Mixture: Docosane / Dodecane / Hexadecane / Hexane / N-Decane / N-Heptane / N-Nonane / N-Octadecane / N-Octane / N-Tridecane / Octacosane / Tetracosane / Tetradecane / Tricontane Other means of : Not available. identification Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 018776 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS - Category 1 substance or mixture SKIN CORROSION/IRRITATION - Category 2 SERIOUS EYE DAMAGE/ EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION (Fertility) - Category 2 TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION (Unborn child) - Category 2 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (SINGLE EXPOSURE) (Respiratory tract irritation) - Category 3 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (SINGLE EXPOSURE) (Narcotic effects) - Category 3 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (REPEATED EXPOSURE) - Category 2 AQUATIC HAZARD (ACUTE) - Category 2 AQUATIC HAZARD (LONG-TERM) - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Extremely flammable liquid and vapor. May form explosive mixtures in Air. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. May cause drowsiness and dizziness. May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This Journal Is © the Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Supplementary Material Guest-controlled Self-Sorting in Assemblies driven by the Hydrophobic Effect Haiying Gan, Bruce C. Gibb* Department of Chemistry University of New Orleans LA 70148 Email: [email protected] S1 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Table of Contents General p S3 1H-NMR spectra of 1 and 2, and mixture of hosts, in the absence of guests p S4 1H-NMR spectra of the complexes of 1.2 and hydrocarbons n-pentane through n-heptadecane p S5-S8 Example COSY and NOESY NMR data (for n-undecane hetero-complex) p S9 Pulse-gradient stimulated spin-echo NMR studies p S11 Table of Percentage of Hetero-complex Formation p S12 References p S13 S2 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Experimental section General All reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company and used as received without further purification. Host 1 and 2 were synthesized as previously reported.1,2 NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Inova 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported relative to D2O (4.80 ppm). Endo Me c O O O O O O O O O O g O O g O O O d O d HO O HO O HO f O OH OH HO f O OH OH O b O O b O H H H H H H H H O e O e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O j j H H a H H H Ha H H m l m l HO O HO O O OH O OH HO O HO O O OH O OH 1 2 S3 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 1H-NMR spectra of host 1, 2 and mixture of hosts in the absence of guests Figure S1: 1H NMR spectra of: 1) 1 mM of 1; 2) 1 mM of 2; 3) 0.5 mM of both 1 and 2 (all 10 mM sodium tetraborate solution).
    [Show full text]
  • Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the N-Alkanes from 2 C21 to C30 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography
    BATCH: je1a04 USER: jeh69 DIV: @xyv04/data1/CLS_pj/GRP_je/JOB_i01/DIV_je0301747 DATE: October 17, 2003 1 Vapor Pressures and Vaporization Enthalpies of the n-Alkanes from 2 C21 to C30 at T ) 298.15 K by Correlation Gas Chromatography 3 James S. Chickos* and William Hanshaw 4 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of MissourisSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 5 6 The temperature dependence of gas chromatographic retention times for n-heptadecane to n-triacontane 7 is reported. These data are used to evaluate the vaporization enthalpies of these compounds at T ) 298.15 8 K, and a protocol is described that provides vapor pressures of these n-alkanes from T ) 298.15 to 575 9 K. The vapor pressure and vaporization enthalpy results obtained are compared with existing literature 10 data where possible and found to be internally consistent. Sublimation enthalpies for n-C17 to n-C30 are 11 calculated by combining vaporization enthalpies with fusion enthalpies and are compared when possible 12 to direct measurements. 13 14 Introduction 15 The n-alkanes serve as excellent standards for the 16 measurement of vaporization enthalpies of hydrocarbons.1,2 17 Recently, the vaporization enthalpies of the n-alkanes 18 reported in the literature were examined and experimental 19 values were selected on the basis of how well their 20 vaporization enthalpies correlated with their enthalpies of 21 transfer from solution to the gas phase as measured by gas 22 chromatography.3 A plot of the vaporization enthalpies of 23 the n-alkanes as a function of the number of carbon atoms 24 is given in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Chemical Names and Alternatives, Abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers
    Table 2. Chemical names and alternatives, abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers. [Final list compiled according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Web site (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/); NIST Standard Reference Database No. 69, June 2005 release, last accessed May 9, 2008. CAS, Chemical Abstracts Service. This report contains CAS Registry Numbers®, which is a Registered Trademark of the American Chemical Society. CAS recommends the verification of the CASRNs through CAS Client ServicesSM] Aliphatic hydrocarbons CAS registry number Some alternative names n-decane 124-18-5 n-undecane 1120-21-4 n-dodecane 112-40-3 n-tridecane 629-50-5 n-tetradecane 629-59-4 n-pentadecane 629-62-9 n-hexadecane 544-76-3 n-heptadecane 629-78-7 pristane 1921-70-6 n-octadecane 593-45-3 phytane 638-36-8 n-nonadecane 629-92-5 n-eicosane 112-95-8 n-Icosane n-heneicosane 629-94-7 n-Henicosane n-docosane 629-97-0 n-tricosane 638-67-5 n-tetracosane 643-31-1 n-pentacosane 629-99-2 n-hexacosane 630-01-3 n-heptacosane 593-49-7 n-octacosane 630-02-4 n-nonacosane 630-03-5 n-triacontane 638-68-6 n-hentriacontane 630-04-6 n-dotriacontane 544-85-4 n-tritriacontane 630-05-7 n-tetratriacontane 14167-59-0 Table 2. Chemical names and alternatives, abbreviations, and Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers.—Continued [Final list compiled according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Web site (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/); NIST Standard Reference Database No.
    [Show full text]