DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsouth Publishing Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newsouth Publishing Template Bibliography Interviews (interviewer in brackets) Vince Chong, 16 November 2016 and 28 November 2017 (Riseman). Bridget Clinch, 30 July 2015 (Robinson). Matt Cone, 27 May 2017 (Riseman). Wally Cowin, 13 September 2016 and 11 March 2017 (Willett). Richard Gration, 13 December 2016 (Riseman). Julie Hendy, 13 May 2016 (Robinson). ‘Mark’, 4 March 2016 (Riseman). Brian McFarlane, 10 July 2015 (Riseman). David Mitchell, 10 July 2014 (Riseman). Carole Popham and Christina Dennis, 18 March 2016 (Robinson). Yvonne Sillett, 29 July 2016 (Robinson). Susie Struth, 12 February 2017 (Robinson). Ellen Zyla, 15 December 2016 (Riseman). Further References Blaxland, John. The Australian Army: From Whitlam to Howard. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Blosnich, John R., and Robert M. Bossarte. ‘Childhood Abuse and Military Experience – Important Information to Better Serve Those Who Have Served’. JAMA Psychiatry 73, no. 3 (2016): 195-96. Blosnich, John R., Melissa E. Dichter, Catherine Cerulli, Sonja V. Batten, and Robert M. Bossarte. ‘Disparities in Adverse Childhood Experiences among Individuals with a History of Military Service’. JAMA Psychiatry 71, no. 9 (2014): 1041-48. Bomford, Janette. Soldiers of the Queen: Women in the Australian Army. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001. Bongiorno, Frank. ‘Anzac and the Politics of Inclusion’. In Nation, Memory and Great War Commemoration Mobilizing the Past in Europe, Australia and New Zealand, edited by Shanti Sumartojo and Ben Wellings, 81-97. Oxford: Peter Lang AG, 2014. ———. ‘A Century of Bipartisan Commemoration: Is Anzac Politically Inevitable?’ In The Honest History Book, edited by David Stephens and Alison Broinowski, 106-19. Sydney: NewSouth, 2017. Brady, Stephen. ‘The Impact of Sexual Abuse on Sexual Identity Formation in Gay Men’. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 17, no. 3-4 (2008): 359-76. Clark, Anna. ‘The Place of Anzac in Australian Historical Consciousness’. Australian Historical Studies 48, no. 1 (February 2017): 19-34. Commonwealth of Australia. Commonwealth Ombudsman and Defence Force Ombudsman Annual reports 1988-89. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1989. Dapin, Mark. ‘“We Too Were Anzacs”: Were Vietnam Veterans Ever Truly Excluded from the Anzac Tradition?’ In The Honest History Book, edited by David Stephens and Alison Broinowski, 77-91. Sydney: NewSouth, 2017. Dixon, Chris. ‘Redeeming the Warrior: Myth-Making and Australia's Vietnam Veterans’. Australian Journal of Politics and History 60, no. 2 (2014): 214-28. Ford, Ruth. ‘Disciplined, Punished and Resisting Bodies: Lesbian Women and the Australian Armed Services, 1950s/60s’. Lilith, no. 9 (1996): 53-77. ———. ‘Lesbians and Loose Women: Female Sexuality and the Women’s Services During World War II’. In Gender and War: Australians at War in the Twentieth Century, edited by Joy Damousi and Marilyn Lake, 81-104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Gower, Steve. Rounds Complete: An Artillery Forward Observer in Vietnam. Sydney: Big Sky Publishing, 2017. Grey, Jeffrey. A Military History of Australia. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. ———. ‘In Every War but One? Myth, History and Vietnam’. In Zombie Myths of Australian Military History, edited by Craig Stockings, 190-212. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2010. Holbrook, Carolyn. Anzac: The Unauthorised Biography. Sydney: NewSouth, 2014. Jennings, Rebecca. Unnamed Desires: A Sydney Lesbian History. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 2015. Johnson, Michael J., and Elaine J. Amella. ‘Isolation of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth: A dimensional concept analysis’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70, no. 3 (2014): 523-32. Lake, Marilyn, and Henry Reynolds. What's Wrong with Anzac? The Militarisation of Australian History. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2010. Macdonald, Ron, and Trudi Cooper. ‘Young Gay Men and Suicide: A Report of a Study Exploring the Reasons Which Young Men Give for Suicide Ideation’. Youth Studies Australia 17, no. 4 (1998): 23-27. McFarlane, Brian. We Band of Brothers: A True Australian Adventure Story. Newcastle: Exact Print + Design, 2000. Moss, Tristan. Guarding the Periphery: The Australian Army in Papua New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Olesen, John, Jean Campbell and Michael Gross. ‘Using action methods to counter social isolation and shame among gay men’. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 29, no. 2 (2017): 91-108. Olliff, Lorna. Colonel Best and Her Soldiers. Sydney: Oliff Publishing Company, 1985. Reynolds, Robert. From Camp to Queer: Re-Making the Australian Homosexual. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2002. ———. What Happened to Gay Life? Sydney: NewSouth, 2007. Reynolds, Robert, and Shirleene Robinson. Gay & Lesbian, Then & Now: Australian Stories from a Social Revolution. Melbourne: Black Inc., 2016. Riseman, Noah. ‘Outmanoeuvring Defence: The Australian Debates over Gay and Lesbian Military Service, 1992’. Australian Journal of Politics and History 61, no. 4 (2015): 562-75. ———. ‘“Just Another Start to the Denigration of Anzac Day”: Evolving Commemorations of Australian LGBTI Military Service’. Australian Historical Studies 48, no. 1 (2017): 35-51. ———. ‘The Stolen Veteran: Institutionalisation, Military Service, and the Stolen Generations’. Aboriginal History 35 (2011): 57-77. ———. ‘Transgender Policy in the Australian Defence Force: Medicalization and Its Discontents’. International Journal of Transgenderism 17, no. 3-4 (2016): 141-54. Riseman, Noah, and Richard Trembath. Defending Country: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Military Service since 1945. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press, 2016. Rosenstreich, Gabi. ‘LGBTI People Mental Health and Suicide’. Revised 2nd ed. Sydney: National LGBTI Health Alliance, 2013. Seal, Graham. Inventing Anzac: The Digger and National Mythology. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press in association with the API Network and Curtin University of Technology, 2004. Sendziuk, Paul. Learning to Trust: Australian Responses to AIDS. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2003. Shilts, Randy. Conduct Unbecoming: Gays & Lesbians in the U.S. Military. London: Penguin Books, 1993. Smaal, Yorick. Sex, Soldiers and the South Pacific, 1939-45: Queer Identities in Australia in the Second World War. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Smaal, Yorick, and Graham Willett. ‘Eliminate the “Females”: The New Guinea Affair and Medical Approaches to Homosexuality in the Australian Army in the Second World War’. In The Pacific War: Aftermaths, Remembrance and Culture, edited by Christina Twomey and Ernest Koh, 233-50. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2015. Snyder-Hill, Stephen. Soldier of Change: From the Closet to the Forefront of the Gay Rights Movement. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014. Stanley, Peter. Bad Characters: Sex, Crime, Mutiny, Murder and the Australian Imperial Force. Sydney: Pier 9, 2010. State of Victoria. Royal Commission into Family Violence: Summary and Recommendations. Parliamentary Paper No 132. March 2016. Stephens, David. ‘Anzac and Anzackery: Useful future or sentimental dream?’ In The Honest History Book, edited by David Stephens and Alison Broinowski, 120-33. Sydney: NewSouth, 2017. Stephens, David, and Alison Broinowski (eds). The Honest History Book. Sydney: NewSouth, 2017. Wadham, Ben. ‘Brotherhood: Homosociality, Totality and Military Subjectivity’. Australian Feminist Studies 28, no. 76 (2013): 212-35. Willett, Graham. Living out Loud: A History of Gay and Lesbian Activism in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2000. Wilsnack, Sharon C., Arlinda F. Kristjanson, Tonda L. Hughes, and Perry W. Benson. ‘Characteristics of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Lesbians and Heterosexual Women’. Child Abuse & Neglect 36, no. 3 (2012): 260-65. Wotherspoon, Garry. Gay Sydney: A History. Sydney: NewSouth, 2016. Xu, Yin, and Yong Zheng. ‘Prevalence of Childhood Sexual Abuse among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People: A Meta-Analysis’. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 24, no. 3 (2015): 315-31. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kim Scott's Writing and the Wirlomin Noongar Language and Stories Project
    Disputed Territories as Sites of Possibility: Kim Scott's Writing and the Wirlomin Noongar Language and Stories Project Natalie Quinlivan BA International Studies, BA Communications (Creative Writing), MA English A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences School of Literature, Art and Media University of Sydney April 2019 Abstract Kim Scott was the first Aboriginal author to win the Miles Franklin Literary Award in 2000 for Benang, an award he won again in 2011 for That Deadman Dance. Yet despite these national accolades, Scott interrogates the very categories of Australian and Indigenous literatures to which his work is subjected. His writing reimagines, incorporates and challenges colonial ways of thinking about people and place. This thesis reveals the provocative proposal running through Scott’s collected works and projects that contemporary Australian society (and literature) should be grafted onto regional Aboriginal languages and stories as a way to express a national sense of “who we are and what we might be”. Scott’s vision of a truly postcolonial Australia and literature is articulated through his collected writings which form a network of social, historical, political and personal narratives. This thesis traces how Scott’s writing and the Wirlomin Noongar Language and Stories Project (Wirlomin Project) reconfigure colonial power relationships in the disputed territories of place, language, history, identity and the globalised world of literature. Ultimately, Scott intends to create an empowered Noongar position in cross-cultural exchange and does so by disrupting the fixed categories inherent in these territories; territories constructed during the colonising and nationalising of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Something Is Wrong with Our Army…' Command, Leadership & Italian
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies ‘Something is wrong with our army…’ Command, Leadership & Italian Military Failure in the First Libyan Campaign, 1940-41. Dr. Craig Stockings There is no question that the First Libyan Campaign of 1940-41 was an Italian military disaster of the highest order. Within hours of Mussolini’s declaration of war British troops began launching a series of very successful raids by air, sea and land in the North African theatre. Despite such early setbacks a long-anticipated Italian invasion of Egypt began on 13 September 1940. After three days of ponderous and costly advance, elements of the Italian 10th Army halted 95 kilometres into Egyptian territory and dug into a series of fortified camps southwest of the small coastal village of Sidi Barrani. From 9-11 December, these camps were attacked by Western Desert Force (WDF) in the opening stages of Operation Compass – the British counter-offensive against the Italian invasion. Italian troops not killed or captured in the rout that followed began a desperate and disjointed withdrawal back over the Libyan border, with the British in pursuit. The next significant engagement of the campaign was at the port-village Bardia, 30 kilometres inside Libya, in the first week of 1941. There the Australian 6 Division, having recently replaced 4 Indian Division as the infantry component of WDF (now renamed 13 Corps), broke the Italian fortress and its 40,000 defenders with few casualties. The feat was repeated at the port of Tobruk, deeper into Libya, when another 27,000 Italian prisoners were taken.
    [Show full text]
  • SURVIVING the GREAT WAR Between 1916 and 1918, More Than
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48619-4 — Surviving the Great War Aaron Pegram Frontmatter More Information S URVIVING THE G REAT W AR AUSTRALIAN PRISONERS OF WAR ON THE WESTERN FRONT, 1916–18 Between 1916 and 1918, more than 3800 men of the Australian Imperial Force were taken prisoner by German forces fighting on the Western Front. Until now, their experiences have been largely overlooked. Australians captured in France and Belgium did not easily integrate into public narratives of Australia in the First World War and its emerging commemorative rituals. Captivity was a story of surrender and inaction, at odds with the Anzac legend and a triumphant national memory of fighting in France that tended to emphasise the Australian Imperial Force’s victories rather than its defeats. Those who had the misfortune of being captured on the Western Front endured a broad range of experiences in German captivity, yet all regarded survival as a personal triumph. Surviving the Great War is the first detailed analysis of the little-known story of Australians in German captivity in the First World War. By placing the hardships of prisoners of war in a broader social and military context, this book adds a new dimension to the national wartime experience and challenges popular representations of Australia’s involvement in the First World War. Aaron Pegram is a senior historian in the Military History Section at the Australian War Memorial, Canberra. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48619-4
    [Show full text]
  • 'The First Casualty When War Comes Is Truth'
    ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’ 54 ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’: Neglected Atrocity in First World War Australian Memory Emily Gallagher Fourth Year Undergraduate, University of Notre Dame ‘The first casualty when war comes is truth’1 Hiram W. Johnson It is assumed, at least in the West, that the glorification of war is a thing of the past. Even more widely accepted is the perception that modern veneration honours the dead without bias or prejudice. In fact, the rich tapestry of the ANZAC legend glorifies war and readily rejects its associated horrors, projecting constructions of heroism and virtue onto national memory. Exploring the popular perception that inhumane war practices are inherently non-Western, this paper assesses the persisting silence on the grotesque experiences of soldiers in war. An examination of the nature and use of chemical warfare in World War One (WWI) and historiographical analysis of Australian scholarship on WWI will form the foundation of case evidence. Additionally, the psychological analysis of ‘joyful killing’ will be discussed as a potential framework through which modern commemoration can expose past embellishments. Bruce Scates’ Return to Gallipoli considers death and the ‘narrowed’ nature of ANZAC war commemoration. He argues that commemorative services perform a conservative political purpose, 1 Attributed to Senator Hiram Johnson in 1917, this quote originates from Samuel Johnson in 1758. See Suzy Platt (ed.), Respectfully Quoted: a Dictionary of Quotations Requested from the Congressional Research service(Washington: Library of Congress, 1989), 360. 55 history in the making vol. 4 no. 1 where personal mourning is displaced with sentiments of patriotism and sacrifice.2 Pronouncing WWI the ‘great imaginative event’ of the century, Peter Hoffenberg argues that Australians have sought to comprehend the catastrophe of war through references to landscape.3 Certainly, the WWI cemeteries on the Western Front strongly support this venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Parade and Our Changing Narrative of Memory1
    Anzac Parade and our changing narrative of memory1 IAN A. DEHLSEN Abstract Australian historian Ken Inglis once called Canberra’s Anzac Parade ‘Australia’s Sacred Way’. A quasi-religious encapsulation of the military legends said to define our national character. Yet, it remains to be discussed how the memorials on Anzac Parade have been shaped by these powerful and pervasive narratives. Each memorial tells a complex story, not just about the conflicts themselves but also the moral qualities the design is meant to invoke. The Anzac Parade memorials chart the changing perceptions of Australia’s military experience through the permanence of bronze and stone. This article investigates how the evolving face of Anzac Parade reflects Australia’s shifting relationship with its military past, with a particular emphasis on how shifting social, political and aesthetic trends have influenced the memorials’ design and symbolism. It is evident that the guiding narratives of Anzac Parade have slowly changed over time. The once all-pervasive Anzac legends of Gallipoli have been complemented by multicultural, gender and other thematic narratives more attuned to contemporary values and perceptions of military service. [This memorial] fixes a fleeting incident in time into the permanence of bronze and stone. But this moment in our history—fifty years ago—is typical of many others recorded not in monuments, but in the memories of our fighting men told and retold … until they have passed into the folklore of our people and into the tradition of our countries.2 These were the words of New Zealand Deputy Prime Minister J.R. Marshall at the unveiling of the Desert Mounted Corps Memorial on Anzac Parade, Canberra, in the winter of 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security
    Origins of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security CJ Coventry LLB BA A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) School of Humanities and Social Sciences UNSW Canberra at ADFA 2018 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Introduction & Methodology 1 Part I: ASIO before Whitlam 9 Chapter One: The creation of ASIO 9 Chapter Two: Bipartisan anti-communism 23 Chapter Three: ASIO’s anti-radicalism, 1950-1972 44 Part II: Perspectives on the Royal Commission 73 Chapter Four: Scholarly perspectives on the Royal Commission 73 Chapter Five: Contemporary perspectives on ASIO and an inquiry 90 Part III: The decision to reform 118 Chapter Six: Labor and terrorism 118 Chapter Seven: The decision and announcement 154 Part IV: The Royal Commission 170 Chapter Eight: Findings and recommendations 170 Conclusion 188 Bibliography 193 ii Acknowledgements & Dedication I dedicate this thesis to Rebecca and our burgeoning menagerie. Most prominently of all I wish to thank Rebecca Coventry who has been integral to the writing of this thesis. Together we seek knowledge, not assumption, challenge, not complacency. For their help in entering academia I thank Yunari Heinz, Anne-Marie Elijah, Paul Babie, the ANU Careers advisors, Clinton Fernandes and Nick Xenophon. While writing this thesis I received help from a number of people. I acknowledge the help of Lindy Edwards, Toni Erskine, Clinton Fernandes, Ned Dobos, Ruhul Sarkar, Laura Poole-Warren, Kylie Madden, Julia Lines, Craig Stockings, Deane-Peter
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL ISSUE No
    Australian Defence Force JOURNAL ISSUE No. 196, 2015 CONTENTS CHAIR’S COMMENTS 2 FORTHCOMING SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES 4 ARTICLES Australia’s Submarine Capability 5 Vice Admiral Tim Barrett, AO, CSC, RAN, Chief of Navy Navigating Uncertain Times: the need for an Australian ‘grand strategy’ 10 Colonel Wade Stothart, DSC, AM, Australian Army Formulating the 2015 Defence White Paper 18 Craig Beutel, Department of Defence ‘There is nothing new under the sun’: an early Australian coalition operation, South Africa, 1900 27 Associate Professor Craig Stockings, University of New South Wales An Embedded Staff Officer in Afghanistan: observations from ‘The Engine Room’ 39 Brigadier M.A. Thompson, AM, Australian Army Chaplaincy in Mental Health Treatment 44 Chaplain Peter Devenish-Meares, Australian Army The Future of the ADF 51 Wing Commander Andrew Hoffmann, CSC, RAAF Evolution of the Battlefield: strategic and legal challenges to developing an effective cyber warfare policy 60 Sub Lieutenant Nam Nguyen, RAN Predicting Future War 70 Dr Robert A. Johnson, University of Oxford Workplace Flexibility in the ADF: anathema or panacea? 79 Emma Wensing, Department of Defence Dr Samantha Crompvoets, Australian National University BOOK REVIEWS 94 1 CHAIR’S COMMENTS Welcome to Issue No. 196 of the Australian Defence Force Journal. This edition contains several articles of direct relevance to the forthcoming 2015 Defence White Paper, including the feature article on Australia’s submarine capability by the Chief of Navy. It is also particularly pleasing that the issue includes an impressive cross-section of contributors, from each of the Services, from a wide range of ranks, and from both public servants and academics, reflecting the disparate nature of those who now regularly contribute to the ‘contest of ideas’ regarding the ADF and the ‘profession of arms’ in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Conversations
    Anzac Canberra Conversation, 15 April 2013 Remembering war — seeking peace Canberra Conversations Remembering war — seeking peace A Canberra Conversation for Anzac Day 2014 Manning Clark House, Forrest Wednesday 15 April, 6.00 – 9.00 pm Hosted by A Chorus of Women 25 participants (list attached) Introduction Canberra Conversations provide an opportunity for Canberra citizens to talk about important issues in a collaborative environment that provides an alternative to the adversarial debate that we usually see in politics, the media and other public discourse. The conversations are based on the principles of dialogue; however, they are not about getting everyone to agree. We have discovered that many disagreements reflect different ‘framing’ so that both parties can be ‘right’ within their own frame, which is revealed through careful listening. We include story and song in our conversations to allow the emotional and ethical aspects of a topic to be voiced. These human qualities are of central importance but are not easily brought to the fore in public forums. Our songs are written by members of A Chorus of Women. In this summary report, we have included the key points of view and lines of discussion expressed by participants, and conclude with comments on the conversation process itself, as well as ideas for keeping this Anzac conversation going. The topic The 100th anniversary of the 1915 Gallipoli landings is fast approaching and the Australian Government is planning large-scale commemorations to mark this event. This is on top of the already increasing participation in Anzac Day events each year. However, while maintaining the deepest respect for service people who lost their lives in war, there is growing concern in some parts of the community about the intense focus given to the Gallipoli campaign, and to war in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling Australia's Story
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Telling Australia’s Story —and why it’s important Report on the inquiry into Canberra’s national institutions Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories April 2019 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 ISBN 978-1-74366-957-0 (Printed version) ISBN 978-1-74366-958-7 (HTML version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................ vii Membership of the Committee ............................................................................................................ xi Terms of reference ............................................................................................................................ xiii List of abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... xiv List of recommendations ................................................................................................................... xvi National institutions examined by the Committee .............................................................................. xxi 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mothering, Resistance and Survival in Kathleen Mary Fallon's Paydirt and Melissa Lucashenko's Mullumbimby
    VICTORIA BROOKMAN Mothering, Resistance and Survival in Kathleen Mary Fallon’s Paydirt and Melissa Lucashenko’s Mullumbimby The systematic removal of Indigenous Australian children was officially exposed over two decades ago, and the Australian Federal Government made an official apology for the practice in 2008, yet the removal rate of Indigenous Australian children by authorities remains disproportionately high. Child removal, inequalities in health, educational, and financial outcomes, and the pervasive ongoing cultural and systematic hostility against First Nations Australians, combine to create a hostile external culture for Indigenous children to grow up in. This article examines how the struggle to raise Indigenous Australian children within this hostile external context manifests in contemporary Australian literature, with respect to two texts: Paydirt (2007) by Kathleen Mary Fallon and Mullumbimby (2013) by Melissa Lucashenko. Both novels have partially autobiographical elements and feature women mothering teenage Indigenous Australian children. In each novel, the threat of child removal is used as a framing device, and reconnection to traditional Indigenous Australian culture forms both a remedy and an essential component of the survival of the children concerned. This article provides a close reading of the themes and narratives of these novels in relation to the Australian political and cultural context in order to examine how it is that the texts’ authors integrate their characters’ maternal practice with their essential resistance
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Painting Anzac A history of Australia’s official war art scheme of the First World War Volume 2 Michael Scheib A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art History and Film Studies Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2015 1 Appendices ________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Paul Ham: History As Its Own Worst Enemy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE FJHP – Volume 31 – 2015 provided by Flinders Academic Commons Forum In Defence of Paul Ham: History as Its Own Worst Enemy Bodie A. Ashton, The University of Adelaide Journalist-cum-popular historian Paul Ham’s bad-tempered 2014 attack on the historical discipline within the academy seems to be a very unusual place for a member of that academy to try and find some common ground. Ham was responding to a review by the University of Queensland’s Martin Crotty, of his book 1914: The Year the World Ended. Crotty’s review was, perhaps, much more even-handed than Ham might have expected — he did not, for example, point out the silly melodrama of the title — but nevertheless, there was certainly a sense that the academic was typing his thoughts with a wry smile and perhaps a disbelieving shake of the head. Ham, after all, claimed that the trenches on the Western Front could be seen from space by 1915. Who, Crotty wondered, quite reasonably, was watching from orbit? 1914 was essentially a ‘Boys’ Own adventure’, and it would not pass muster among serious academics.1 However, Crotty was careful to throw a bone to the 1 This is perhaps a little questionable, as the academy has produced some woeful potboilers in the past, and not a few of them on the topic of the First World War. The reader is directed to Niall Ferguson’s The Pity of War for an example of faulty research, argument and logic.
    [Show full text]