Barrera V. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., No. 17-5668, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
No Shepard’s Signal™ As of: November 6, 2017 2:16 PM Z Barrera v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division October 23, 2017, Decided; October 23, 2017, Filed Case No. 17-cv-5668 Reporter 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175223 *; 2017 WL 4837597 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Defendant SAMUEL BARRERA, individually and on behalf of all moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GUARANTEED Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6). See [13]. For the RATE, INC., Defendant. reasons explained below, the motion is denied. Consistent with the parties' initial status report, written Core Terms discovery shall issue by 11/20/17. The status hearing previously set for [*2] 11/29/17 stands; the parties alleges, telemarketing, telephone, consumer, cell, should be prepared at that time to set case clicked, phone number, mortgage, phone, express management dates, including a fact discovery consent, written consent, website, button completion deadline. Counsel: [*1] For Samuel Barrera, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff: Gary STATEMENT Michael Klinger, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kozonis Law, Chicago, IL USA; Daniel M. Hutchinson, Lieff Cabraser Plaintiff alleges that Defendant, a mortgage company Heimann & Bernstein Llp, San Francisco, CA USA; that originates mortgages for residential homes, owns John Tate Spragens, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & and operates a website devoted to offering consumers Bernstein, Llp, Nashville, TN USA; Jonathan D. Selbin, mortgage quotes over the Internet. Complaint [1], ¶¶ 2, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, Llp, New York, 3. Consumers who visit the website provide information, NY USA; Ryan F Sullivan, Kozonis & Associates Ltd, including a preferred telephone number, to receive a Chicago, IL USA.
[Show full text]