DOCSLIB.ORG

Abortion Legislation in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abortion Legislation in Europe ABORTION LEGISLATION IN EUROPE (UPDATED January 2009) IPPF EUROPEAN NETWORK Rue Royale 146 1000 Brussels Belgium Email: [email protected] Countries AUSTRIA ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA .............................................................................................................................................. 12 BULGARIA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 CYPRUS.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 CZECH REPUBLIC ..................................................................................................................................................................... 18 DENMARK ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 FINLAND ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 FRANCE.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 GEORGIA....................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 GERMANY ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 GREECE .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 HUNGARY ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 ICELAND........................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 IRELAND ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 ISRAEL ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 ITALY .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 KAZAKHKSTAN .......................................................................................................................................................................... 45 KYRGYZSTAN.............................................................................................................................................................................. 47 LATVIA ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 LITHUANIA.................................................................................................................................................................................. 51 LUXEMBOURG ............................................................................................................................................................................ 53 MACEDONIA (FYR).................................................................................................................................................................. 55 MOLDOVA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 58 NORWAY ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 POLAND ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 63 PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 ROMANIA...................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 RUSSIAN FEDERATION......................................................................................................................................................... 69 SLOVAK REPUBLIC.................................................................................................................................................................. 71 SPAIN ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 73 SWEDEN ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 76 SWITZERLAND........................................................................................................................................................................... 78 TAJIKISTAN ................................................................................................................................................................................ 80 TURKEY.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 UNITED KINGDOM................................................................................................................................................................... 84 UZBEKISTAN............................................................................................................................................................................... 86 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................................................................ 88 January 2009 2 Notes 1) The document is in its eighth edition. The previous one was compiled in February 2004. It has been updated following information received from IPPF European Network Member Associations (MAs) 2) In DISPARITY IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW, and in COMMENTS the text is directly from the Member Associations (MAs). 3) The exchange rate for the conversion into US$ was calculated at the time of the revision. Acknowledgements IPPF European Network would like to thank all its Member Associations for their invaluable contributions to this update. January 2009 3 ALBANIA Albanian Center for Population and Development [email protected] LEGISLATION Abortion Law Nr 8045, 7 December 1995, “on the interruption of pregnancy” GROUNDS/GESTATIONAL LIMITS Up to 12 weeks: On request, in case a woman considers that a pregnancy causes psychological and social problems Up to 22 weeks: For social reasons Rape or other sexual crime No Limit: Severe (incurable) malformation of the fetus If continuing the pregnancy and/or childbirth would put the woman’s life or health at risk REGULATIONS/CONDITIONS Abortion should be performed by a physician-specialist/obstetrician-gynaecologist, and can take place in public and private health institutions. Pre- and post-abortion counselling is obliged. The physician performing the abortion is obliged to inform women of family planning services and to advise them about contraceptive methods. In case a woman, after the pre-abortion counselling, repeals the request, she is asked by the physician to confirm her request in writing. This confirmation should be done at least 7 days after her first request. If the time span of 7 days surpasses the legal limits, the physician may decide to reduce it to 2 days. Unmarried minors up to 16 need the consent of the person exercising parental authority or legal protection. The request for an abortion should not be made in their presence. A health commission consisting of three physicians decides, after examination and consultation, to allow for an abortion on medical grounds (thus no limit as mentioned above). An abortion for social reasons (up to 22nd week) needs the approval of a commission of three specialists (physician, social worker and lawyer). January 2009 4 METHODS Types of abortion methods available in country are: Vacuum aspiration (electric or manual) Dilatation and Curettage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central and Eastern European Women's Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 3 (173) 2018 Table of contents: Burning Issue Regional Updates Global Updates Youth Resources Upcoming events BURNING ISSUE The 62nd Session of Commission on the Status of Women delivers a blueprint to ensure the rights and development of rural women and girls The largest UN gathering focused on achieving gender equality and women’s human rights concluded on March 23rd with strong and concrete commitments that address the realities of women and girls in rural areas. The outcome of the two-week meeting, known as the Agreed Conclusions adopted by Member States, puts forth concrete measures to lift rural women and girls out of poverty and to ensure their rights, well-being and resilience. The Commission recognized that women and girls in rural areas often face disparate reproductive health outcomes due to a lack of agency over their own lives and a lack of access to health care services. It noted that these disparities are exacerbated by multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. Governments committed to address these barriers by addressing health care worker 1 shortages, ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive health services, information and education, and protecting women’s reproductive rights and right to control their sexuality. The Agreed Conclusions also include ensuring rural women’s adequate living standards with equal access to land and productive assets, ending poverty, enhancing their food security and nutrition, decent work, infrastructure and technology, education and health, and ending all forms of violence and harmful practices. Member States recognize in the conclusions rural women’s important role in addressing hunger and food insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/99164 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-23 and may be subject to change. The Diffusion of Morality Policies among Western European Countries between 1960 and 2010 A Comparison of the Temporal and Spatial Diffusion Patterns of Six Morality and Eleven Non-morality Policies Roderick Sluiter This study was financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), grant number 452-05-305. Sluiter, R. The Diffusion of Morality Policies among Western European Countries be- tween 1960 and 2010. A Comparison of the Temporal and Spatial Diffusion Patterns of Six Morality and Eleven Non-morality Policies Dissertation Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands ISBN: 978-94-6191-439-2 Typeset in LATEX2ε Cover design by Dirkjan Sluiter Printed by Ipskamp Drukkers B.V. Enschede ©Roderick Sluiter, 2012 The Diffusion of Morality Policies among Western European Countries between 1960 and 2010 A Comparison of the Temporal and Spatial Diffusion Patterns of Six Morality and Eleven Non-morality Policies Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 30 oktober 2012 om 10.30 uur precies door Roderick Sluiter geboren op 20 maart 1984 te Gendringen Promotores: Prof. dr. A. Need (University of Twente) Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • En Om Abort.Pdf
    ABOUT ABORTION we stand up for abortion rights When RFSU was founded in 1933, abortion was illegal in Sweden and ever since then, the question of abortion has been one of RFSU’s key issues. Since 1975, abortion has been unrestricted in Sweden up to 18 weeks of pregnancy. RFSU believes that a woman’s right to choose if and when to have a child is a basic human right. To limit, ban or criminalize abortion is a violation of that right. In countries where abortion is not permitted, the consequence is not fewer abortions, but that women are injured and die. Despite this fact, abortion is still illegal in many countries. RFSU continues to fight for abortion rights in Sweden and worldwide. Abortion has always existed and will always exist. In Sweden, almost half of all women will have one or more abortions in their lifetime. Through raising awareness and seeking political influence, we want to spread information about abortion and break the stigma and silence that continues to surround it. 3 What is abortion? Abortion entails ending a pregnancy. The pregnancy is ended either with medicine or through a minor surgical procedure. The first Swedish Abortion Act was passed and abor- tion was permitted under certain conditions. For ex- ample, abortion was allowed if the woman was severely 1938 ill or if the child was at risk of a severe hereditary illness. Other reasons included rape or incest. Abortion became permitted for socio-medical reasons as well. Now abortion was permitted if it could be as- sumed that a woman’s physical or mental health would 1946 be severely impaired by bearing and taking care of a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and the Law in New
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch Briefing Paper No 9/05 ISSN 1325-4456 ISBN 0 7313 1784 X August 2005 © 2005 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE David Clune (MA, PhD, Dip Lib), Manager..............................................(02) 9230 2484 Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law .........................(02) 9230 2356 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ......................(02) 9230 2768 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Research Officer, Law ...................................(02) 9230 3085 Stewart Smith (BSc (Hons), MELGL), Research Officer, Environment ...(02) 9230 2798 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics.......................(02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author. Information about Research Publications can be found on the Internet at: www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/WEB_FEED/PHWebContent.nsf/PHPages/LibraryPublications Advice on
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gendercide', Abortion Policy, and the Disciplining of Prenatal Sex
    This is the version of the article accepted for publication in Global Public Health published by Taylor & Francis and available online 14 Feb 2017 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1289230 Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/23603/ ‘Gendercide’, Abortion Policy, and the Disciplining of Prenatal Sex-Selection in Neoliberal Europe Navtej Purewal, SOAS University of London Lisa Eklund, University of Lund Abstract This article examines the contours of how sex-selective abortion (SSA) and ‘gendercide’ have been problematically combined within contemporary debates on abortion in Europe. Analysing the development of policies on the topic, we identify three ‘turns’ which have become integral to the biopolitics of SSA in Europe: the biomedical turn, the ‘gendercide’ turn, and the Asian demographic turn. Recent attempts to discipline SSA in the UK and Sweden are examined as a means of showing how the neoliberal state in Europe is becoming increasingly open to manoeuvres to undermine the right to abortion, even where firm laws exist. Keywords: Biopolitics, gendercide, sex selection, abortion, neoliberal state Introduction Sex-selective abortion (SSA) and ‘gendercide’ have been problematically combined with reignited controversies in contemporary debates on abortion in Europe. The notion of ‘missing girls’ (Sen, 2003) implicit in the term ‘gendercide’ highlights the fact that girls are being systematically discriminated against before birth and even at conception. While legal statute in most
    [Show full text]
  • Gestational Limits on Abortion in the United States Compared to International Norms
    American Reports Series Issue 6 | February 2014 Gestational Limits on Abortion in the United States Compared to International Norms Angelina Baglini, J.D. American Report Series The Charlotte Lozier Institute’s American Reports Series presents analysis of issues affecting the United States at the national level. These reports are intended to provide insight into various issues concerning life, science, and bioethics. Previous Reports: Byron Calhoun, M.D., Perinatal Hospice: Allowing Parents to Be Parents, American Reports Series 1. Gene Tarne, The Ethical Stems of Good Science, American Reports Series 2 Charles A. Donovan; Sullivan, Nora, Abortion Reporting Laws: Tears in the Fabric, American Reports Series 3. Charles A. Donovan, The Adoption Tax Credit: Progress and Prospects for Expansion, American Reports Series 4. Gene Tarne; Mullin, Andrew, Maryland Joins the Trend for Ethical Stem Cell Research, American Reports Series 5. The full text of this publication can be found at: www.lozierinstitute.org/internationalabortionnorms Comments and information requests can be directed to: Charlotte Lozier Institute 1707 L NW, Suite 550 Washington, DC 20036 email: [email protected] Ph. 202-223-8023/www.lozierinstitute.org The views expressed in this paper are attributable to the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the position of the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Nothing in the content of this paper is intended to support or oppose the progress of any bill before the U.S. Congress. 2 www.LOZIERINSTITUTE.org February 2014 American Report Series Abstract: The United States is one of only seven countries in the world that permit elective abortion past 20 weeks. Upholding laws restricting abortion on demand after 20 weeks would situate the United States closer to the international mainstream, instead of leaving it as an outlying country with ultra-permissive abortion policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism and the 'Woman As Mother' Discourse in Reproductive Politics In
    Feminism and the ‘Woman Equals Mother’ Discourse in Reproductive Politics in Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Gender, Work and Social Inquiry School of Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Adelaide April 2012 Angella Duvnjak BA(Hons) (Adelaide University) BSW (Flinders University) i ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................... v Declaration ........................................................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background: The journey to ‘here’ 1 1.2 Time, Context and Structure of the Thesis 5 1.2.1 Situating the research questions .................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Research questions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Induced Legal Abortion in Sweden During 1939-1974: Change in Practice and Legal Reform
    STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY Dept of Sociology, Demography Unit / www.suda.su.se Induced Legal Abortion in Sweden during 1939-1974: Change in Practice and Legal Reform by Per Gunnar Cassel [email protected] Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2009:2 © Copyright is held by the author(s). SRRDs receive only limited review. Views and opinions expressed in SRRDs are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect those held at the Demography Unit. Stockholm University Demography Unit Department of Sociology 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Induced Legal Abortion in Sweden during 1939-1974: Change in Practice and Legal Reform Per Gunnar Cassel March 2009 Abstract: This paper aims at showing the development of abortion during Sweden’s law of restricted abortion from 1939 to 1974. Before 1939 abortions were illegal. After 1974 abortion became allowed on demand. These surrounding periods give an explanatory background to the 36 years under study. The abortion trend during 1939-1974 consists of three sub-periods of accelera­ tion, decrease, and recovery. Taken together, abortion numbers increased from a low to a high level from 1939 to 1974. This gave way to a smooth changeover from illegal over restricted abortion to abortion on demand. To a high degree, the development depended on the actions of engaged individuals. In particular, the 1960s was a period of crucial social change. Keywords: ABORTION, ABORTION TRENDS, CONTRACEPTIVE, SWEDEN Handelt stets so, dass die Anzahl der Wahlmöglichkeiten grösser wird.1 Heinz von Förster 1 Act always so, as to increase the number of choices; von Förster was one of the originators of cybernetics.
    [Show full text]
  • App. 1 APPENDIX a Affidavit of Dr. Priscilla K. Coleman STATE of OHIO COUNTY of WOOD § § § KNOW ALL MEN by THESE PRESENTS
    App. 1 APPENDIX A Affidavit of Dr. Priscilla K. Coleman STATE OF OHIO § KNOW ALL MEN BY § THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF WOOD § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority on this day personally appeared Dr. Priscilla K. Coleman, Ph.D. who is personally known to me, and after being by me first duly sworn according to law on her oath did depose and say that: I. Introduction and Professional Background 1. “My name is Dr. Priscilla K. Coleman. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years of age and I am fully competent to make this Affidavit. I reside in Wood County, Ohio. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and the following is true and correct. 2. I am providing opinions on the National Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) 2018 report titled, “The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States” for June Medical Services LLC v. Gee. In this Affidavit, the fol- lowing topics are addressed: 1) history of the NAS, fo- cusing on allegations of bias and conflicts of interest; 2) bias and conflicts of interest specific to the report on abortion; 3) an overview of the abortion and mental health literature in the NAS report; and 4) scientific evidence indicating abortion increases risk for mental health declines. App. 2 3. I am a developmental psychologist and a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) at Bowling Green State University (BGSU) in Ohio. I have been a full-time employee at BGSU for 17 years. I received promotion to Associate Professor with ten- ure in 2005 and promotion to Professor in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Around the World. an Overview of Legislation, Measures, Trends, and Consequences Agnès Guillaume, Clémentine Rossier
    Abortion around the world. An overview of legislation, measures, trends, and consequences Agnès Guillaume, Clémentine Rossier To cite this version: Agnès Guillaume, Clémentine Rossier. Abortion around the world. An overview of legislation, mea- sures, trends, and consequences. Population (English edition), INED - French Institute for Demo- graphic Studies, 2018, 73 (2), pp.217-306. 10.3917/pope.1802.0217. hal-02300904 HAL Id: hal-02300904 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02300904 Submitted on 30 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agnès GUILLAUME* and Clémentine ROSSIER** Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - Institut national d'études démographiques 193.49.36.51 10/04/2019 10h16. © I.N.E.D Abortion Around the World An Overview of Legislation, Measures, Trends, and Consequences Following the May 2018 Irish referendum largely in favour of abortion, only two European countries, Malta and Andorra, still do not give women the right to decide to end a pregnancy in the first weeks. Outside of Europe, the situations are highly diverse, but abortion remains illegal or restricted to certain conditions in a great number of countries, notably those of the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Unsafe Abortion and Its Consequences Priorities for Research and Action
    Priorities for Action Research and Abortion Preventing and Unsafe its Consequences nsafe abortion is a significant yet preventable cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. The Ugravity and global incidence of unsafe abortion Preventing call for a better understanding of the factors behind the persistence of unsafe abortion and of the barriers to preventing unsafe abortion and managing its conse- Unsafe Abortion quences. This volume brings together the proceedings from an inter-disciplinary consultation to assess the and its global and regional status of unsafe abortion and to identify a research and action agenda to reduce unsafe abortion and its burden on women, their families, and Consequences public health systems. The volume addresses a compre- hensive range of issues related to research on prevent- ing unsafe abortion, outlines regional priorities, and Priorities for identifies critical topics for future research and action on preventing unsafe abortion. Research and Action Iqbal H. Iqbal Shah H. Warriner Ina K. Editors Ina K. Warriner Iqbal H. Shah cover 4.indd 1 31/01/2006 13:34:26 Preventing Unsafe Abortion and its Consequences Priorities for Research and Action Editors Ina K. Warriner Iqbal H. Shah A-Intro.indd 1 09/02/2006 10:44:45 Suggested citation: Warriner IK and Shah IH, eds., Preventing Unsafe Abortion and its Consequences: Priorities for Research and Action, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006. 1. Abortion, Induced - adverse effects 2. Abortion, Induced - epidemiology 3. Women’s health services 4. Health priorities
    [Show full text]
  • Between Applicant and Ireland Respondent
    IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (APPLICATION NO. 26499/02) BETWEEN D APPLICANT AND IRELAND RESPONDENT WRITTEN COMMENTS BY CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 44, § 2 OF THE RULES OF THE COURT 14 APRIL 2005 Pardiss Kebriaei, Legal Adviser Christina Zampas, Legal Adviser for Europe Center for Reproductive Rights 120 Wall Street New York, N.Y. 10005 United States Tel: 917-637-3600 Fax: 917-637-3666 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………….1 II. INTEREST OF THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ……………………………….1 III. THE LEGAL ISSUE ………………………………………………………………………………1 IV. DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………………………………1 A. RESPECT FOR A WOMAN’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TO LIFE, HEALTH, DIGNITY, AND PRIVACY PRECLUDES FORCING HER TO CARRY HER PREGNANCY TO TERM IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING IN CASES OF FETAL IMPAIRMENT ……………………………………………………….2 1. THE LEGISLATION OF MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE …..2 2. GLOBAL LEGISLATION AND TRENDS ……………………………………..2 3. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JURISPRUDENCE OF MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE ……………………………………………...3 4. “WRONGFUL BIRTH” JURISPRUDENCE OF MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE ………………………………………………….4 5. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS ……………………...4 (i) UNITED NATIONS TREATY MONITORING BODIES ……………. 4 (ii) INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS .....5 B. ENSURING WOMEN’S ACCESS TO REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE AND INFORMATION MANDATES REMOVAL OF LEGAL BARRIERS TO INFORMATION AND REFERRALS ON ABORTION …………………………………...5 1. PROHIBITION ON “ADVOCATING AND PROMOTING” ABORTION ……. 5 (i) REGIONAL STANDARDS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE ……... 5 (ii) LEGISLATION OF MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE …………………………………………………………….6 (iii) UNITED NATIONS TREATY MONITORING BODIES ……………. 6 iii (iv) INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS ..
    [Show full text]