DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Tepco Illustrated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Tepco Illustrated 2013 TEPCO ILLUSTRATED “TEPCO ILLUSTRATED” is an English translation of the Japanese original. If there are discrepancies between the translation and the original, the latter shall prevail. － CONTENTS － I. TEPCO Outline.................................................................................................................................................................................................1 1. TEPCO Service Area....................................................................................................................................................................................1 2. Company Highlights........................................................................................................................................................................................2 (1) Company Highlights............................................................................................................................................................................2 (2) Business Scale Developments....................................................................................................................................................3 (3) Business Scale by Area...................................................................................................................................................................4 (4) Comparison of TEPCO with 10 Japanese Electric Power Companies (Total)..............................................5 a. Position of TEPCO in Japanese Electric Power Industry..............................................................................5 b. Business Highlights for All Japanese Electric Power Companies .............................................................6 3. Organization Chart..........................................................................................................................................................................................7 II. Management Rationallization....................................................................................................................................................................8 1. Cost Reduction.................................................................................................................................................................................................8 <Reference> Concrete measures aiming for cost reduction................................................................................................8 2. Asset Sales .........................................................................................................................................................................................................9 III. Power Demand...............................................................................................................................................................................................10 1. Electricity Sales............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 (1) Changes in Electricity Sales and Number of Customers (since FY2005)......................................................10 (2) Changes in Electricity Sales and Number of Customers (FY2000 - FY2004)............................................11 (3) Changes in Electricity Sales and Number of Customers (until FY1999)........................................................12 (4) Changes in Japan's GDP and TEPCO's Power Demand.........................................................................................14 (5) Average Rates of Increase in GDP, Final Energy Consumption, Electricity Sales, and Peak Demand...................................................................................................................................................................................................15 (6) Recent Changes in GDP Elasticity........................................................................................................................................15 (7) Changes in Percentage Composition of Large Industrial Power Customers by Industry Type.......16 (8) Electric Curve of Large Industrial Power as Diffusion Index..................................................................................17 (9) Residential Customer Power Demand Changes in Energy Consumption and Contract Power per Household (Monthly Average in the TEPCO Service Area)...................................................................................18 2. Peak Demand.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 (1) Changes in Peak Demand (Daily Peak at Generation End)....................................................................................19 <Reference> Recent Changes in Peak Demand..............................................................................................................20 (2) Trend of Monthly Peak Demand (Daily Peak at Generation End) ......................................................................21 (3) Pattern of Daily Electricity Usage (dates of annual peak demand recorded)..............................................22 IV. Electricity Supply Facilities.....................................................................................................................................................................23 1. Power Generation Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................23 (1) Power Generation (authorized capacity)............................................................................................................................23 <Reference> Special Note on Power Generation Facility..........................................................................................23 (2) Generation Capacity by Energy Source.............................................................................................................................25 a. Generation Capacity by Energy Source (TEPCO only)................................................................................25 b. Generation Capacity by Energy Source (TEPCO including purchased power)..............................25 <Reference> Combining of Energy Sources to Meet Changing Demand..............................................26 (3) Major Power Generation Facilities.........................................................................................................................................27 a. Hydroelectric Power (as of April 1, 2013)..............................................................................................................27 b. Thermal Power (as of July 1, 2013)..........................................................................................................................31 <Reference> Thermal Power Generation Efficiency (LHV: Lower Heating Value)..........................34 1 c. Nuclear Power (as of April 1, 2013)...........................................................................................................................35 d. New Energy (as of April 1, 2013).................................................................................................................................35 <Reference> Sites Where TEPCO Has Introduced New Energy (as of the end of March 2013)36 (4) Electricity Generated and Purchased..................................................................................................................................37 (5) Changes in Power Output Composition by Energy Sources (TEPCO including purchased power)38 a. TEPCO .......................................................................................................................................................................................38 b. 10 Electric Power Companies......................................................................................................................................39 (6) Electricity Supply Plan...................................................................................................................................................................40 a. Electric Power Development Program....................................................................................................................40 <Reference> Decommissioning Plan of Emergency power source...........................................................40 b. Demand Outlook...................................................................................................................................................................41 c. Peak Demand Outlook......................................................................................................................................................41 (7) Wide Area Coordination System Operation......................................................................................................................42 a. Purpose......................................................................................................................................................................................42 b. Recent Situations.................................................................................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Opinion
    Second Opinion Kanagawa Prefecture September 24, 2020 Kanagawa Prefecture Green Bond Framework ESG Dept., Credit Rating Planning and Research Office Chief Analyst: Takeshi Usami Rating and Investment Information, Inc. (R&I) has confirmed the alignment of the Kanagawa Prefecture Green Bond Framework of Kanagawa Prefecture dated September 24, 2020 with the “Green Bond Principles 2018" and the Ministry of the Environment's “Green Bond Guidelines 2020." This opinion is based on the following views. Overview of the Opinion (1) Use of Proceeds Proceeds will be allocated to finance new projects related to rivers, coasts, and erosion control under the “Kanagawa Prefecture Flood Disaster Prevention Strategy.” The Kanagawa prefectural government assessed the impact of climate change to conclude that it would have unavoidable impact even with the maximum level of mitigation for greenhouse gas emissions. In order to adapt to such climate change, it formulated a regional climate change adaptation plan (the Kanagawa Prefecture Global Warming Prevention Plan) and positions the Flood Disaster Prevention Strategy as a concrete adaptation measure to flood disasters. R&I has confirmed that the eligible projects cover rivers, coasts, and mountainous districts and that their measures are applicable to flood disasters caused by climate change. In addition, we have confirmed how the environmental and social implications of the project will be dealt with. The eligible projects fall under the category of the Green Bond Principles, ‘climate change adaptation.’ (2) Process for Project Evaluation and Selection With the “Kanagawa Climate Emergency Declaration” as its policy for dealing with climate change, it identifies disasters caused by climate change that need to be dealt with under the “Kanagawa Prefecture Global Warming Prevention Plan” and formulates specific measures in the “Kanagawa Prefecture Flood Disaster Prevention Strategy.” The eligible projects are included in the Flood Disaster Prevention Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • As of 6 December 2012 the Instructions
    The instructions associated with food by Director-General of the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters (Restriction of distribution in Fukushima Prefecture) As of 6 December 2012 Fukushima Prefecture Restriction of distribution 2011/3/21～： (excluding areas listed on the cells below) 2011/3/21～4/8 Kitakata-shi, Bandai-machi, Inawashiro-machi, Mishima-machi, Aizumisato-machi, Shimogo-machi, Minamiaizu-machi 2011/3/21～4/16 Fukushima-shi, Nihonmatsu-shi, Date-shi, Motomiya-shi, Kunimi-machi, Otama-mura, Koriyama-shi, Sukagawa-shi, Tamura-shi（excluding miyakoji area）, Miharu-machi, Ono-machi, Kagamiishi- machi, Ishikawa-machi, Asakawa-machi, Hirata-mura, Furudono-machi, Shirakawa-shi, Yabuki-machi, Izumizaki-mura, Nakajima-mura, Nishigo-mura, Samegawa-mura, Hanawa-machi, Yamatsuri- machi, Iwaki-shi Raw milk 2011/3/21～4/21 Soma-shi, Shinchi-machi 2011/3/21～5/1 Minamisoma-shi (limited to Kashima-ku excluding Karasuzaki, Ouchi, Kawago and Shionosaki area), Kawamata-machi (excluding Yamakiya area) 2011/3/21～6/8 Tamura-shi (excluding area within 20 km radius from the TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant), Minamisoma-shi (excluding area within 20 km radius from the TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant and Planned Evacuation Zones), Kawauchi-mura (excluding area within 20 km radius from the TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plan 2011/3/21～10/7 Aizuwakamatsu-shi, Kori-machi, Tenei-mura, Hinoemata-mura, Tadami-machi, Kitashiobara-mura, Nishiaizu-machi, Aizubange-machi, Yugawa-mura, Yanaizu-machi, Kanayama-machi, Showa-mura,
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release Press Release （This is provisional translation. Please refer to the original text written in Japanese.） November 12, 2013 Policy Planning and Communication Division, Inspection and Safety Division, Department of Food Safety To Press and those who may concern, Restriction of distribution of foods based on the Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness, direction of Director-General of the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Today, based on the results of inspections conducted until yesterday, the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters has issued the restriction of distribution for Governors of Fukushima, Ibaraki and Chiba as follows. (1) Wild mushroom produced in Aizumisato-machi, Fukushima prefecture. (2) Japanese eel captured in Tone river (limiting lower reaches from Sakai Ohashi but including its branches), Ibaraki prefecture. (3) Japanese eel captured in Tone river (limiting lower reaches from Sakai Ohashi, but including its branches and excluding upper reaches from Inba drainage pump station and Inba floodgate; lower reaches from Ryosoyousui Daiichi water pumping station; Yasuji river; Yodaura lake and Yodaura river), Chiba prefecture 1. With regard to Fukushima prefecture, the restriction of distribution of wild mushroom produced in Aizumisato-machi is instructed today. (1) The Instruction of the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters is attached as attachment 1. (2) The concept of management at Fukushima prefecture after ordering the restriction of distribution is attached as attachment 2. 2. With regard to Ibaraki prefecture, the restriction of distribution of Japanese eel captured in Tone river in Ibaraki prefecture (limiting lower reaches from Sakai Ohashi but including its branches) is instructed today. (1) The Instruction of the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters is attached as attachment 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Fukushima Nuclear Disaster – Implications for Japanese Agriculture and Food Chains
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Fukushima nuclear disaster – implications for Japanese agriculture and food chains Bachev, Hrabrin and Ito, Fusao Institute of Agricultural Economics, Sofia, Tohoku University, Sendai 3 September 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49462/ MPRA Paper No. 49462, posted 03 Sep 2013 08:50 UTC Fukushima Nuclear Disaster – Implications for Japanese Agriculture and Food Chains1 Hrabrin Bachev, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Sofia, Bulgaria2 Fusao Ito, Professor, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan 1. Introduction On March 11, 2011 at 14:46 JST the Great East Japan Earthquake occurred with the epicenter around 70 kilometers east of Tōhoku. It was the most powerful recorded earthquake ever hit Japan with a magnitude of 9.03 Mw. The earthquake triggered powerful tsunami that reached heights of up to 40 meters in Miyako, Iwate prefecture and travelled up to 10 km inland in Sendai area. The earthquake and tsunami caused many casualties and immense damages in North-eastern Japan. According to some estimates that is the costliest natural disaster in the world history [Kim]. Official figure of damages to agriculture, forestry and fisheries alone in 20 prefectures amounts to 2,384.1 billion yen [MAFF]. The earthquake and tsunami caused a nuclear accident3 in one of the world’s biggest nuclear power stations - the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, Okuma and Futaba, Fukushima prefecture. After cooling system failure three reactors suffered large explosions and level 7 meltdowns leading to releases of huge radioactivity into environment [TEPCO]. Radioactive contamination has spread though air, rains, dust, water circulations, wildlife, garbage disposals, transportation, and affected soils, waters, plants, animals, infrastructure, supply and food chains in immense areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Beşinci Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, 26-30 Mayıs 2003, İstanbul
    USEFULNESS OF HIGH DENSITY MICROTREMOR OBSERVATION FOR UNDERSTANDING OF GROUND SHAKING CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSURFACE SOIL LAYER Takahisa ENOMOTO1, Toshio KURIYAMA2, Manuel NAVARRO3 and Iware MATSUDA4 ABSTRACT The ground shaking characteristics, predominant period and amplification, due to subsurface soil layer are very important for damage estimation for buildings before the earthquake occurrence. We are performing high density microtremor observation in order to understand the usefulness for understanding of microtremor characteristics and also to check the utilization for seismic microzoning study. So, we performed high density microtremor observation in several cities and towns located plains and low land areas in Kanagawa Prefecture, observed sites were about 10,000 sites. Then we could understand the differences of ground shaking characteristics caused by subsurface soil layer. And also we investigated the predominant period distribution by performing the dense microtremor observation in Yokohama City, the capital city of Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan about 6,500 sites dividing 250m interval and calculated H/V spectra at each site. And the result is significantly good agreement between the predominant period obtained from H/V spectra and the general information of subsurface soil structure. In this paper, we summarized the observed H/V spectral ratio in order to understand of ground shaking characteristics in Kanagawa Prefecture. And also, according to the calculated results in Yokohama City, we investigated about the relationship between predominant period and depth of unconsolidated soil layer considering the history of landform development. INTRODUCTION In Japan, there are so many large scale earthquakes occurred along the tectonic situation, as like as the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Mw9.0) which is explained by The Plate Tectonics Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Disaster Surveys
    ●Documents Major Disaster Surveys 1 Field survey and guidance based on the nature-oriented river works advisor system for emergency projects to deal with severe damage and disaster assistance projects (Niigata Prefecture, Wakayama Prefecture) From July 27 to 30, 2011, parts of Niigata and Fukushima Prefectures were struck by record breaking heavy rain exceeding the torrential rain which struck Niigata and Fukushima Prefectures in July 2004, causing damage along the Igarashi River, the Agano River and so on. We advised on forms of revetments and embedding according to the causes of the damage, and gave advice on the design of new channels and the treatment of revetments and watersidess taking account of environment, for the Igarashi River, Shiotani River, and Hane River. Because the Agano River includes a river cruising course, we gave guidance about revetments considering the scenery and the height of polders. Typhoon 12 brought record-breaking torrential rainfall exceeding a total of 1,800mm at places on the Kii Peninsula, causing damage on rivers including the Hidaka River, Ota River, and the Nachi River. For the Hidaka River, we gave advice on methods of improving the levees after confirming the flood control functions of the open levees. For the Ota River, we advised on excavation method which conserved the riparian forests growing continuously at the waterside of the low water channel. For the Nachi River, we advised on the setting of the channel profile foreseeing its future change which had been buried by this disaster and provided guidance on a method to consider the world treasure, the Nachi Taisha Shrine.
    [Show full text]
  • TICCIH XV Congress 2012
    TICCIH Congress 2012 The International Conservation for the Industrial Heritage Series 2 Selected Papers of the XVth International Congress of the International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage § SECTION II: PLANNING AND DESIGN 113 A Study of the Hydraulic Landscape in Taoyuan Tableland: the Past, Present and Future / CHEN, Chie-Peng 114 A Study on Preservation, Restoration and Reuse of the Industrial Heritage in Taiwan: The Case of Taichung Creative Cultural Park / YANG, Hong-Siang 138 A Study of Tianjin Binhai New Area’s Industrial Heritage / YAN, Mi 153 Selective Interpretation of Chinese Industrial Heritage Case study of Shenyang Tiexi District / FAN, Xiaojun 161 Economization or Heritagization of Industrial Remains? Coupling of Conservation and CONTENTS Urban Regeneration in Incheon, South Korea / CHO, Mihye 169 Preservation and Reuse of Industrial Heritage along the Banks of the Huangpu River in Shanghai / YU, Yi-Fan 180 Industrial Heritage and Urban Regeneration in Italy: the Formation of New Urban Landscapes / PREITE, Massimo 189 Rethinking the “Reuse” of Industrial Heritage in Shanghai with the Comparison of Industrial Heritage in Italy / TRISCIUOGLIO, Marco 200 § SECTION III: INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION 207 The Japanese Colonial Empire and its Industrial Legacy / Stuart B. SMITH 208 FOREWORDS 1 “La Dificultad” Mine. A Site Museum and Interpretation Center in the Mining District of FOREWORD ∕ MARTIN, Patrick 2 Real del Monte and Pachuca / OVIEDO GAMEZ, Belem 219 FOREWORD ∕ LIN, Hsiao-Wei 3 Tracing
    [Show full text]
  • Dams in Japan Overview 2018
    Dams in Japan Overview 2018 Tokuyama Dam JAPAN COMMISSION ON LARGE DAMS CONTENTS Japan Commission on Large Dams History … …………………………………………………………………… 1 Operation … ………………………………………………………………… 1 Organization… ……………………………………………………………… 1 Membership… ……………………………………………………………… 1 Publication…………………………………………………………………… 2 Annual lecture meeting… …………………………………………………… 2 Contribution to ICOLD… …………………………………………………… 2 Dams in Japan Development of dams … …………………………………………………… 3 Major dams in Japan… ……………………………………………………… 4 Hydroelectric power plants in Japan… ……………………………………… 5 Dams completed in 2014 − 2016 in Japan … ……………………………… 6 Isawa Dam… ……………………………………………………………… 7 Kyogoku Dam … ………………………………………………………… 9 Kin Dam…………………………………………………………………… 11 Yubari-Shuparo Dam… …………………………………………………… 13 Tokunoshima Dam………………………………………………………… 15 Tsugaru Dam… …………………………………………………………… 17 Introduction to Dam Technologies in Japan Trapezoidal CSG dam … …………………………………………………… 19 Sediment bypass tunnel (SBT)… …………………………………………… 19 Preservation measures of dam reservoirs… ………………………………… 19 Advancement of flood control operation… ………………………………… 20 Dam Upgrading Vision… …………………………………………………… 21 Utilization of ICT in construction of dam… ………………………………… 22 Papers in ICOLD & Other Technical Publications Theme 1 Safety supervision and rehabilitation of existing dams…………… 23 Theme 2 New construction technology … ………………………………… 26 Theme 3 Flood, spillway and outlet works… ……………………………… 29 Theme 4 Earthquakes and dams… ………………………………………… 30 Theme 5 Reservoir sedimentation and sustainable development……………
    [Show full text]
  • New Prediction of Sediment-Related Disaster Critical Rainfall Using Meteorological Model WRF
    Symposium Proceedings of the INTERPRAENENT 2018 in the Pacific Rim New Prediction of Sediment-related Disaster Critical Rainfall Using Meteorological Model WRF Toshihide SUGIMOTO1, Toshiyuki SAKAI2 and Hiroshi MAKINO1* 1 NEWJEC Inc. (2-3-20 Honjo-Higashi, Kita-ku, Osaka 5310074, Japan) 2 Japan Weather Association (2-3-2 Minamisenba, Chuo-ku, Osaka 5420081, Japan) *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] A large number of sediment-related disasters have recently occurred in Japan due to record heavy rains exceeding 1,000 mm in cumulative rainfall and concentrated heavy rains equivalent to an hourly rainfall of 100 mm. These heavy rainfall events are likely to increase in frequency because of the impact of an increase in water vapor content caused by rising temperatures associated with global warming. Today, sediment disaster alert information is made public to ready people for sediment disasters. However, since calculation is based on the actually measured rainfall, announcement is generally made just before a sediment disaster occurs. There is no sufficient time left before people can leave their homes for shelter. This is one of the major problems related to the current system of sediment disaster alert information announcement. In this research, we conducted rainfall prediction based on rainfall simulation that uses numerical calculation meteorological model Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) as a new evaluation technique that predicts a rainfall event likely to cause a sediment disaster at an early stage or two to three days in advance and made a comparative review of the simulation results with recent rainfall events that actually caused sediment disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings of Environmental Radiation Monitoring of Public Water Areas (Preliminary Report)
    Readings of Environmental Radiation Monitoring of Public Water Areas (Preliminary Report) September 9, 2011 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters (Radioactivity Team) Disaster Provision Main Office of Fukushima Pref. (Nuclear Power Team) 1 Date Wednesday, August 17 – Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2 Number of monitoring locations Rivers: 8 locations (water quality) Lakes and dam reservoirs: 13 locations (water quality) Lakes and dam reservoirs: 1 location (bottom sediment) 3 Monitoring Results (1) Rivers (water quality) Radioactive iodine: Not detected in any locations Radioactive cesium: Cs-134 Not detected – 1.60 Bq/L Cs-137 Not detected – 2.15 Bq/L (2) Lakes and dam reservoirs (water quality and bottom sediment) a. Water quality Radioactive iodine: Not detected Radioactive cesium: Not detected b. Bottom sediment Radioactive iodine: Not detected Radioactive cesium: Cs-134 338 Bq/L Cs-137 405 Bq/L *Water quality monitoring has been conducted once a month for rivers since May and once a month for lakes, dam reservoirs, and agricultural reservoirs since June. The quality of groundwater is monitored once a year. (Nuclear Power Team, Monitoring Team: 024-521-6938) Readings of Environmental Radiation Monitoring at Rivers, Lakes, Dam Reservoirs, and Agricultural Reservoirs（Preliminary Report）(Second report in August) September 9, 2011 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters (Radioactivity Team) Disaster Provision Main Office of Fukushima Pref. (Nuclear Power Team) Water & Air Environment Division, Social Affairs & Environment Department, Fukushima
    [Show full text]
  • Dams in Japan.Indd
    Dams in Japan Overview 2015 Tokuyama Dam JAPAN COMMISSION ON LARGE DAMS 1 DAMS IN JAPAN - OVERVIEW 2015 Japan Commission on Large Dams History Membership In 1931, three years after the International Commission on The members of JCOLD are incorporated bodies involved Large Dams (ICOLD) was established, Japan joined in dam construction. They include government bodies ICOLD as the Japan National Committee on Large Dams. concerned with dam construction, electric power companies, In 1944, Japan withdrew from ICOLD during the World survey and research bodies, academic associations, War II, then rejoined in March 1953. On September 13, industrial associations, construction consultants, 1962, the Japan Commission on Large Dams was construction companies, and manufacturers (75 members as established, and in January 2012, it became a General of January 2015). Incorporated Association. Operation JCOLD is involved in operations such as surveys, research, international technology exchanges, etc. concerning large dams and related facilities (below, “large dams”), in order to improve the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of large dams and to contribute to the development of the Japanese economy. Responsibilities include: Collection of information, surveying, and research concerning large dams (1) Exchange of technology and guidance concerning large dams (2) Participation in ICOLD, assistance with its activities, and international exchange of technology concerning large dams (3) Introduction of and spreading awareness of the achievements of surveys and research concerning large dams (4) Other activities necessary to achieve the goals of JCOLD In recent years, JCOLD has actively conducted a program of surveys and research on methods of harmonizing dam development with the environment and on ways to mitigate their environmental impacts to achieve the sustainable development of dams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volume 4
    The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Fukushima The The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volume 4/5 Technical Volume 4/5 Radiological Consequences Radiological Consequences Radiological PO Box 100, Vienna International Centre 1400 Vienna, Austria Printed in Austria ISBN 978–92–0–107015–9 (set) 1 THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT TECHNICAL VOLUME 4 RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GERMANY OMAN ALBANIA GHANA PAKISTAN ALGERIA GREECE PALAU ANGOLA GUATEMALA PANAMA ARGENTINA GUYANA PAPUA NEW GUINEA ARMENIA HAITI PARAGUAY AUSTRALIA HOLY SEE PERU AUSTRIA HONDURAS PHILIPPINES AZERBAIJAN HUNGARY POLAND BAHAMAS ICELAND PORTUGAL BAHRAIN INDIA QATAR BANGLADESH INDONESIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELARUS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF ROMANIA BELGIUM IRAQ RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELIZE IRELAND RWANDA BENIN ISRAEL SAN MARINO BOLIVIA, PLURINATIONAL ITALY SAUDI ARABIA STATE OF JAMAICA SENEGAL BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAPAN SERBIA BOTSWANA JORDAN SEYCHELLES BRAZIL KAZAKHSTAN SIERRA LEONE BRUNEI DARUSSALAM KENYA SINGAPORE BULGARIA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SLOVAKIA BURKINA FASO KUWAIT SLOVENIA BURUNDI KYRGYZSTAN SOUTH AFRICA CAMBODIA LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SPAIN CAMEROON REPUBLIC SRI LANKA CANADA LATVIA SUDAN CENTRAL AFRICAN LEBANON SWAZILAND REPUBLIC LESOTHO SWEDEN CHAD LIBERIA SWITZERLAND CHILE LIBYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CHINA LIECHTENSTEIN TAJIKISTAN COLOMBIA LITHUANIA CONGO LUXEMBOURG THAILAND COSTA RICA MADAGASCAR THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAWI REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CROATIA MALAYSIA TOGO
    [Show full text]