1 Spring 2018 PSC 3192W – Political Violence Prof. Evgeny Finkel, [email protected] Class Office Hours Mon. 11:10AM-1:00PM

1 Spring 2018 PSC 3192W – Political Violence Prof. Evgeny Finkel, Efinkel@Gwu.Edu Class Office Hours Mon. 11:10AM-1:00PM

Spring 2018 PSC 3192W – Political Violence Prof. Evgeny Finkel, [email protected]

Class Office Hours Mon. 11:10AM-1:00PM Wed. 1-2PM or by appointment Monroe Hall, Room 351 Monroe Hall, Room 419

Course Description Millions of people around the globe are confronted with violence on a daily basis. This can include violence such as civil wars, ethnic riots, suicide bombings, famines, and genocide. While these types of violent phenomena are ancient, only in recent decades have scholars devoted serious study and attention to analyzing political violence in its various forms. The goal of this seminar is to introduce students to this thriving field of study, to present key academic works on various aspects and forms of violence, to discuss the similarities and differences between various forms of political violence, and to analyze the theoretical and methodological approaches to studying violence. We will end by discussing the impact of violence on the societies and people that have experienced it and the ways to prevent and manage future violent conflicts.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes As a result of completing this course, students will be able to:  Understand the main theories that explain the emergence and the unfolding of various types of violence as well as the key concepts of the field;  To write short response papers that critically evaluate the field’s main theories and arguments  To be able to translate academic knowledge into writing for broader audiences  To write an independently researched academic paper

Requirements and Class Policies The class is a seminar. This means that the students are expected to attend the lectures and to read all the required materials. The class is structured around weekly meetings, in which the

instructor and the students critically evaluate and discuss the readings. Hence, students’ active participation in the discussions is required and class participation is a substantial part of the final grade. This is a writing-oriented class and the students will be required to conduct various research and writing assignments that culminate in the end-of-class final research paper. In addition, the students will be required to submit three short response papers.

Response Papers During the semester the students will be required to submit three response papers. The papers should be about three pages long. The exact dates of the papers will be determined during the first lecture. The goal of each response paper is to critically evaluate the readings that have been assigned for the coming lecture and raise points and questions for the classroom discussion. In addition, the students who wrote the week’s response papers will serve as “discussion leaders” and will present a short summary of their paper at the beginning of the lecture. The response papers should be sent to me by pre-class Friday 5pm (EST). The response papers will be graded and the feedback will help you to proceed with your final research paper.

Research Paper The research paper provides you with the opportunity to pursue any analytical, theoretical, or historical question about political violence that interests you. A good paper both informs and persuades; to do this it must be logically organized, clearly argued, well researched, and well documented. Avoid writing a paper that merely restates the readings. You are expected to do some original thinking, research, and analysis in this paper. There are several excellent guides on the web that I encourage you to consult on how to go about writing an analytical research paper. Some good sites include:  How to Research a Political Science Paper, by Peter Liberman: http://qcpages.qc.edu/Political_Science/researching.html  Writing Political Science Papers: Some Useful Guidelines, by Peter Liberman,: http://qcpages.qc.edu/Political_Science/tips.html  Reading, Writing, and Researching for History: A Guide for College Students, by Patrick Rael: http://www.bowdoin.edu/writing-guides/

 Writing a Research Paper, by Sarah Hamid: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/ResearchW/index.html  An accurate summary of some things not to do, which (unfortunately) students commonly do, can be found at Advice on How to Write a Bad Paper.

Paper proposals (about one page) which include the topic and at least five relevant sources are due by Friday, March 2, 5PM; the paper outline and summary (two to three pages) are due by Friday, April 6, 5PM. Remember, by that time you should also be in an advanced stage of research. The paper drafts will be reviewed by your peers and discussed in class. The draft paper is due by Thursday, April 26, 5PM. The final paper should be 18-20 pages, double spaced, Times New Roman 12 font (not including bibliography), with one-inch margins. The final papers are due by Wednesday, May 9, 5PM. Late submission of proposals, outlines, and papers (both draft and final) will be penalized by a half of a letter grade for every day of the delay. The paper topic should be approved by the instructor. The students are strongly encouraged to discuss their ideas and progress with the instructor, and I do expect to meet every student at least twice during the class. If you are unable to come to my office hours, I will be happy to schedule a meeting at a different time.

Grading Criteria Response Papers: 15% Final Research Paper: 60% Participation: 25%

Academic Conduct I personally support the GW Code of Academic Integrity. It states: “Academic dishonesty is defined as cheating of any kind, including misrepresenting one's own work, taking credit for the work of others without crediting them and without appropriate authorization, and the fabrication of information.” For the remainder of the code, see: http://www.gwu.edu/~ntegrity/code.html

Special Needs and Support outside the Classroom

Any student who may need an accommodation based on the potential impact of a disability should contact the Disability Support Services office at 202-994-8250 in the Marvin Center, Suite 242, to establish eligibility and to coordinate reasonable accommodations. For additional information please refer to: http://gwired.gwu.edu/dss/ The University Counseling Center (UCC, 202-994-5300) offers 24/7 assistance and referral to address students' personal, social, career, and study skills problems. Services for students include:  Crisis and emergency mental health consultations  Confidential assessment, counseling services (individual and small group), and referrals

Course Outline and Schedule

Lecture 1. 01.22: Course Overview and Description

Lecture 2. 01.29. Studying Violence: Perspectives and Concepts  Vittorio Bufacchi, "Two Concepts of Violence," Political Studies Review 3:2 (2005), pp. 193-204.  Stathis Kalyvas, “The Ontology of Political Violence,” Perspectives on Politics, 2003, 1(3), pp. 475-494.  Peter Turchin, “Dynamics of political instability in the United States, 1780–2010,” Journal of Piece Research, 49(4), 2012, pp. 577-591

Lecture 3. 02.05. Ethnic Conflict  Barry Posen, “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict,” Survival, 1993, 35(1), pp. 27- 47.  Charles King, “The Benefits of Ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia's Unrecognized States,” World Politics, 2001, 53(4), pp. 524-552.  James Fearon and David Laitin, “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War,” American Political Science Review, 2003, 97(1), pp. 75-90.

Lecture 4. 02.12. Riots and Pogroms  Donald Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001), pp. 1-42.  Ashutosh Varshney, “Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond,” World Politics, 2001, 53(3), pp. 362-398.  Steven Wilkinson, Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), ch. 1,2.  Jeffrey Kopstein and Jason Wittenberg, “Deadly Communities: Local Political Milieus and the Persecution of Jews in Occupied Poland,” Comparative Political Studies, 2011, 44(2), pp. 259-283.

02.19. President’s Day. No Classes

Lecture 5. 02.26. Resistance, and Rebellion  Ted Gurr, Why Men Rebel, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), ch. 2.  James Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), ch. 7.  Jack Goldstone and Bret Useem, “Prison Riots as Microrevolutions: An Extension of State‐Centered Theories of Revolution,” American Journal of Sociology, 104(4), 1999, pp. 985-1029.  Gunes Murat Tezcur, “Ordinary People, Extraordinary Risks: Participation in an Ethnic Rebellion,” American Political Science Review, 110(2), 2016, pp. 247-264.

**PAPER PROPOSALS ARE DUE BY THE END OF THE WEEK**

Lecture 6. 03.05. Terrorism  Alan Krueger and Jitka Maleckova, “Education, Poverty, and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, 17(4), pp. 119–44.  Andrew Kydd and Barbara Walter, “The Strategies of Terrorism,” International Security, 2006, 31(1), pp. 49-80.  Robert Pape, “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political Science Review, 2003, 97(3), pp. 1-19.  Max Abrahms, “Why Terrorism Does Not Work,” International Security, 2006, 31(2), pp. 42-78.

03.12. Spring Break. No Classes

Lecture 7. 03.19. Civil War 1

 Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, “Greed and Grievance in Civil War,” World Bank, 2001  Stathis Kalyvas, “‘New’ and ‘Old’ Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?” World Politics, 54 2001, 54, pp. 99-118.

 Michael Ross, “What Do We Know about Natural Resources and Civil War?” Journal of Pease Research, 2004, 41(3), pp. 337-356.  Stathis Kalyvas, The Logic of Violence in Civil War, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 1-15, 146-209, 330-363.

Lecture 8. 03.26. Civil War 2  Stathis Kalyvas, “Ethnic Defection in Civil War,” Comparative Political Studies, 2008, 41(8), pp. 1043-1068.  Jason Lyall, Are Co-Ethnics More Effective Counter-Insurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War,” American Political Science Review, 2010, 104(1), pp. 1-20.  Dara Kay Cohen. “Explaining Rape during Civil War: Cross-National Evidence (1980– 2009).” American Political Science Review 107(03), pp. 461–77.  Jeremy Weinstein, Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 1-60.

Lecture 9. 04.02. Genocide and Mass Violence 1

 Scott Straus, “Contested meanings and conflicting imperatives: a conceptual analysis of genocide,” Journal of Genocide Research, 2001, 3(3), pp. 349-375.  Christian Gerlach, “Extremely violent societies: an alternative to the concept of genocide,” Journal of Genocide Research, 2006, 8(4), pp. 455-471.  Michael Mann, “The Dark Side of Democracy,” New Left Review I/235, May-June 1999, pp. 18-45.  Scott Straus, “Retreating from the Brink: Theorizing Mass Violence and the Dynamics of Restraint,” Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 2012, pp. 343-362

**PAPER OUTLINES ARE DUE BY THE END OF THE WEEK**

Lecture 10. 04.09. Genocide and Mass Violence 2  Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York: Knopf, 1996), pp. 1-24.

 Christopher Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (New York: Harper Collins, 1993), pp. 159-189.  Benjamin Valentino, Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004), pp. 66-90.  Diana Dumitru, and Carter Johnson, “Constructing Interethnic Conflict and Cooperation: Why Some People Harmed Jews and Others Helped Them during the Holocaust in Romania,” World Politics, 63(1), 2011, pp. 1-42.

Lecture 11. 04.16. War and Peace 1  Séverine Autesserre, “Hobbes and the Congo – Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention in the Congo,” International Organization, 2009, 63, pp. 249-280.  Page Fortna, "Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after Civil War," International Studies Quarterly, 2004, 48(2), pp. 269-92.  Christopher Blattman, “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda,” American Political Science Review, 2009, 103(2), pp. 231-247.  Guy Grossman, Devorah Manekin, and Dan Miodownik. “The Political Legacies Of Combat: Attitudes Towards War And Peace Among Israeli Ex-Combatants.” International Organization, 2015, 69(4), pp. 981-1009.

Lecture 12. 04.23. War and Peace 2

 Nicholas Sambanis, “Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature,” World Politics, 52(4), 2000, pp. 437-483.  Benjamin Valentino, “The True Costs of Humanitarian Intervention: The Hard Truth About a Noble Notion,” Foreign Affairs, 90(6), 2011, pp. 60-73  Roy Licklider, “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945-1993,” American Political Science Review, 89(3), 1995, pp. 681-690.  Steven Pinker, The Better Angels of Our Nature, NY, Viking 2011, pp. 1-58, 91-128.

**PAPER DRAFTS ARE DUE BY 04/26, 5PM**

Lecture 13. 04.30. Peer Review of Paper Drafts

Lecture 14. 05.02. Designated Monday. New Directions in the Violence Research

 Sarah Parkinson, “Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High Risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War,” American Political Science Review, 2003, 107 (3), pp. 418-432.  Joshua W. Busby et al., “Climate Change and Insecurity,” International Security, 2013, 37(4), 132-172.  Wendy Pearlman, “Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings,” Perspectives on Politics, 2013, 11(2), pp. 387-409.  Thomas Hegghammer, “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Variation in Western Jihadists’ Choice between Domestic and Foreign Fighting,” American Political Science Review, 2003, 107 (1), pp. 1-15.

FINAL RESEARCH PAPERS ARE DUE WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 5PM