Title: India – Jammu & Kashmir – Sikhs –Sikh Student Federation – Lashkar-E-Taiba – Security Forces

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title: India – Jammu & Kashmir – Sikhs –Sikh Student Federation – Lashkar-E-Taiba – Security Forces Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND31365 Country: India Date: 2 March 2007 Keywords: India – Jammu & Kashmir – Sikhs –Sikh Student Federation – Lashkar-e-Taiba – Security forces This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Are the authorities targeting Sikh Student Federation members or Sikhs generally in Jammu? 2. Are Lashkar-e-Taiba targeting Sikh Student Federation or Sikhs generally in Jammu? 3. Can the authorities adequately protect Sikhs in Kashmir, or in Jammu? 4. Has there been any relevant activity reported in Badila? 5. Would it be correct to say that Sikhs involved with the Sikh Student Federation could freely live elsewhere in India as Indian nationals from Jammu? RESPONSE 1. Are the authorities targeting Sikh Student Federation members or Sikhs generally in Jammu? There were no reports in the available information regarding the authorities targeting Sikh Student Federation members in Jammu and Kashmir. The available information also does not suggest that Sikhs generally are a specific target of the authorities in Jammu and Kashmir, although there have been clashes between Sikhs and security forces. However, according to a number of government reports and human rights groups, there have been ongoing human rights abuses against civilians generally, by both security forces and militant groups. Members of the security forces continued to enjoy impunity for human rights violations. Clashes between Sikhs and security forces The US Department of State reported that there had been violent clashes between Sikhs and police in 2001 as a result of perceived inaction over targeted killings of Sikhs. The report states: Early in 2001, eight Sikhs were killed, allegedly by an obscure militant group. On February 3, 2001, two gunmen killed six Sikhs and wounded at least four others in Srinagar…The Government sent a four-member team to Kashmir to investigate the killings; however, no one had been charged, and there was still no reported progress in the investigation of the killings as of the end of the period covered by this report. Sikhs protested the killings, which led to violent clashes with police (US Department of State 2003, International Religious Freedom Report for 2003 – India, 18 December, Section III – Attachment 1). The Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) report on human rights in India for 2006 states that security personnel continued to use “disproportionate force to control public protests.” An article dated 27 May 2001 in the Daily Excelsior reported that “[p]olice lobbed tear gas shells and used batons [in Srinigar] today to disperse stone-pelting demonstrators protesting the alleged ‘secret mission of police’ to kill a Sikh family in the area.” Various Kashmir separatist groups issued statements accusing the State Government of “using its forces to kill a Sikh family” and “sabotage” peace efforts in Jammu and Kashmir. The All India Sikh Student Federation demanded an investigation into the incident. An article dated 6 February 2001 details violent statewide clashes between protesting Sikhs and security forces, after six Sikhs were killed by unidentified gunmen. The clashes resulted in the death of one of the Sikh protesters when police fired into the crowd. Curfew restrictions were placed on a number of cities, and highways were closed (Asian Centre for Human Rights 2007, ‘India: Human Rights Report 2006’, ACHR website, January – Attachment 2; ‘People protest against Police bid to ‘kill’ Sikh family’ 2001, Daily Excelsior, 28 May http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/01may28/news.htm#4 – Accessed 19 February 2007 – Attachment 3; ‘Cremation of youth passes off peacefully’ 2001, The Tribune, 7 February http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010207/main1.htm – Accessed 19 February 2007 – Attachment 4). There were no recent reports in the available information of clashes between the Sikh community and security forces. However, human rights violations and the killing of civilians by security forces during counterinsurgency operations has continued. According to the latest US Department of State report on human rights in India: During the year the killing of civilians continued in the course of counterinsurgency operations in Jammu and Kashmir. Human rights activists stated that accurate numbers were not available due to limited access to the region, but ACHR alleged that 733 civilians were killed in 2004. The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) and the Disturbed Areas Act remained in effect in Jammu and Kashmir…The Disturbed Areas Act gives police extraordinary powers of arrest and detention, and the AFSPA provides search and arrest powers without warrants…Human rights groups alleged that security forces operated with virtual impunity in areas under the act. …Security forces committed thousands of serious human rights violations over the course of the insurgency, including extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and torture (US Department of State 2006, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2005 – India, 8 March, Section 1 – Attachment 5). The use of civilians as “human shields” by the security forces is detailed in reports by the US Department of State and the Asian Centre for Human Rights (US Department of State 2006, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2005 – India, 8 March – Attachment 5; Asian Centre for Human Rights 2007, ‘India: Human Rights Report 2006’, ACHR website, January – Attachment 2). A 2006 Human Rights Watch (HRW) report titled “Everyone lives in fear” – Patterns of impunity in Jammu and Kashmir details numerous human rights violations committed by security forces – police, army and paramilitary – in the state (Human Rights Watch 2006, “Everyone lives in fear” – Patterns of impunity in Jammu and Kashmir, September – Attachment 6). The Amnesty International 2006 report on India states that in Jammu and Kashmir: Civilians were repeatedly targeted by state agencies and armed groups. • In July, four juveniles aged between 11 and 15 were shot dead by paramilitary Rashtriya Rifles in Kupwara district. Local people said that the boys had participated in a marriage party and gone for a stroll but ran away when ordered to stop. They said that the army had been informed of possible movements of people attending the party late at night (Amnesty International 2006, Amnesty International Annual Report 2006 – India – Attachment 7. The 2006 Freedom House report on India-administered Kashmir states that: In a continuing cycle of violence, several thousand militants, security force personnel, and civilians are killed each year. Approximately 500,000 Indian security forces based in Kashmir, including soldiers, federal paramilitary troops, and the police, carry out arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, “disappearances,” and custodial killings of suspected militants and alleged civilian sympathizers. From 3,000 to 8,000 people are estimated to have disappeared during the course of the insurgency. As part of the counterinsurgency effort, the government has organized and armed pro-government militias composed of former militants. Members of these groups act with impunity and have reportedly carried out a wide range of human rights abuses against pro-Pakistani militants, as well as civilians. Local activists report that human rights violations continue to occur at levels similar to those of previous years (Freedom House 2006, Freedom in the World – Kashmir [India] (2006) – Attachment 8). Background Information The following includes information on Sikhs in Jammu and Kashmir, the Sikh Student Federation (SSF), and a brief background on the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir. Sikhs in Jammu and Kashmir The available information indicates that Sikhs in Jammu and Kashmir experience difficulties in regards to employment, education and government representation, as well as access to adequate security. An article dated 6 February 2006 reports that representatives of Sikh organisations were requesting measures that could fix some quota for Sikhs in government jobs along with allowing representation of Sikhs in the state legislature and in the state Cabinet. An article dated 6 February 2001, states that the “Sikh community in Jammu and Kashmir was facing immense problems of employment, education and feeling increasingly alienated” (‘Sikhs seek say in Indo-Pak talks’ 2006, Kashmir Today, 6 February http://www.kashmirtoday.com/ – Accessed 27 February 2007 – Attachment 9; ‘Give security to Sikhs: Talwandi’ 2001, The Tribune, 7 February http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010207/main1.htm – Accessed 19 February 2007 – Attachment 4). A 2002 article details complaints made by Sikh groups, including the All India Sikh Student Federation (AISSF), that the State Government was discriminating against Sikhs. The article states: the participants said that Sikh youths are being discriminated against with regard to providing Government jobs, selection in professional colleges and recruitment in departments particularly in State Police. It was stated in the meeting that whenever the Government issued selection list of candidates, proper share was not given to Sikh community as a result of which youth of Sikh community are falling prey at the hands of anti-social elements. The meeting passed resolutions
Recommended publications
  • Khalistan & Kashmir: a Tale of Two Conflicts
    123 Matthew Webb: Khalistan & Kashmir Khalistan & Kashmir: A Tale of Two Conflicts Matthew J. Webb Petroleum Institute _______________________________________________________________ While sharing many similarities in origin and tactics, separatist insurgencies in the Indian states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have followed remarkably different trajectories. Whereas Punjab has largely returned to normalcy and been successfully re-integrated into India’s political and economic framework, in Kashmir diminished levels of violence mask a deep-seated antipathy to Indian rule. Through a comparison of the socio- economic and political realities that have shaped the both regions, this paper attempts to identify the primary reasons behind the very different paths that politics has taken in each state. Employing a distinction from the normative literature, the paper argues that mobilization behind a separatist agenda can be attributed to a range of factors broadly categorized as either ‘push’ or ‘pull’. Whereas Sikh separatism is best attributed to factors that mostly fall into the latter category in the form of economic self-interest, the Kashmiri independence movement is more motivated by ‘push’ factors centered on considerations of remedial justice. This difference, in addition to the ethnic distance between Kashmiri Muslims and mainstream Indian (Hindu) society, explains why the politics of separatism continues in Kashmir, but not Punjab. ________________________________________________________________ Introduction Of the many separatist insurgencies India has faced since independence, those in the states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have proven the most destructive and potent threats to the country’s territorial integrity. Ostensibly separate movements, the campaigns for Khalistan and an independent Kashmir nonetheless shared numerous similarities in origin and tactics, and for a brief time were contemporaneous.
    [Show full text]
  • "Survival Is Now Our Politics": Kashmiri Hindu Community Identity and the Politics of Homeland
    "Survival Is Now Our Politics": Kashmiri Hindu Community Identity and the Politics of Homeland Author(s): Haley Duschinski Source: International Journal of Hindu Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Apr., 2008), pp. 41-64 Published by: Springer Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40343840 Accessed: 12-01-2020 07:34 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Hindu Studies This content downloaded from 134.114.107.39 on Sun, 12 Jan 2020 07:34:33 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms "Survival Is Now Our Politics": Kashmiri Hindu Community Identity and the Politics of Homeland Haley Duschinski Kashmiri Hindus are a numerically small yet historically privileged cultural and religious community in the Muslim- majority region of Kashmir Valley in Jammu and Kashmir State in India. They all belong to the same caste of Sarasvat Brahmanas known as Pandits. In 1989-90, the majority of Kashmiri Hindus living in Kashmir Valley fled their homes at the onset of conflict in the region, resettling in towns and cities throughout India while awaiting an opportunity to return to their homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Sikh Self-Sacrifice and Religious Representation During World War I
    religions Article Sikh Self-Sacrifice and Religious Representation during World War I John Soboslai Department of Religion, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave., Montclair, NJ 07043, USA; [email protected] Received: 5 January 2018; Accepted: 8 February 2018; Published: 10 February 2018 Abstract: This paper analyzes the ways Sikh constructions of sacrifice were created and employed to engender social change in the early twentieth century. Through an examination of letters written by Sikh soldiers serving in the British Indian Army during World War I and contemporary documents from within their global religious, legislative, and economic context, I argue that Sikhs mobilized conceptions of self-sacrifice in two distinct directions, both aiming at procuring greater political recognition and representation. Sikhs living outside the Indian subcontinent encouraged their fellows to rise up and throw off their colonial oppressors by recalling mythic moments of the past and highlighting the plight of colonial subjects of the British Raj. Receiving less discussion are Punjabi Sikhs who fought in British forces during the Great War and who spoke of their potential sacrifice as divinely sanctioned in service to a benevolent state. Both sides utilized religious symbolism in the hope that Sikhs would again enjoy a level of self-rule that had been lost with the arrival of the British Empire. Keywords: Sikhism; World War I; self-sacrifice; imperialism; British Raj When the British Raj gave way to the dual nation-states of India and Pakistan in 1947, the partitioning of the two was determined largely on the basis of religion. Pakistan became the home for the area’s large Muslim population, and India for its Hindus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sikhism Reinterpreted: the Creation of Sikh Identity
    Lake Forest College Lake Forest College Publications Senior Theses Student Publications 4-16-2014 Sikhism Reinterpreted: The rC eation of Sikh Identity Brittany Fay Puller Lake Forest College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://publications.lakeforest.edu/seniortheses Part of the Asian History Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Puller, Brittany Fay, "Sikhism Reinterpreted: The rC eation of Sikh Identity" (2014). Senior Theses. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at Lake Forest College Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Lake Forest College Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sikhism Reinterpreted: The rC eation of Sikh Identity Abstract The iS kh identity has been misinterpreted and redefined amidst the contemporary political inclinations of elitist Sikh organizations and the British census, which caused the revival and alteration of Sikh history. This thesis serves as a historical timeline of Punjab’s religious transitions, first identifying Sikhism’s emergence and pluralism among Bhakti Hinduism and Chishti Sufism, then analyzing the effects of Sikhism’s conduct codes in favor of militancy following the human Guruship’s termination, and finally recognizing the identity-driven politics of colonialism that led to the partition of Punjabi land and identity in 1947. Contemporary practices of ritualism within Hinduism, Chishti Sufism, and Sikhism were also explored through research at the Golden Temple, Gurudwara Tapiana Sahib Bhagat Namdevji, and Haider Shaikh dargah, which were found to share identical features of Punjabi religious worship tradition that dated back to their origins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institution of the Akal Takht: the Transformation of Authority in Sikh History
    religions Article The Institution of the Akal Takht: The Transformation of Authority in Sikh History Gurbeer Singh Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The Akal Takht is considered to be the central seat of authority in the Sikh tradition. This article uses theories of legitimacy and authority to explore the validity of the authority and legitimacy of the Akal Takht and its leaders throughout time. Starting from the initial institution of the Akal Takht and ending at the Akal Takht today, the article applies Weber’s three types of legitimate authority to the various leaderships and custodianships throughout Sikh history. The article also uses Berger and Luckmann’s theory of the symbolic universe to establish the constant presence of traditional authority in the leadership of the Akal Takht. Merton’s concept of group norms is used to explain the loss of legitimacy at certain points of history, even if one or more types of Weber’s legitimate authority match the situation. This article shows that the Akal Takht’s authority, as with other political religious institutions, is in the reciprocal relationship between the Sikh population and those in charge. This fluidity in authority is used to explain and offer a solution on the issue of authenticity and authority in the Sikh tradition. Keywords: Akal Takht; jathedar; Sikh institutions; Sikh Rehat Maryada; Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC); authority; legitimacy Citation: Singh, Gurbeer. 2021. The Institution of the Akal Takht: The 1. Introduction Transformation of Authority in Sikh History. Religions 12: 390. https:// The Akal Takht, originally known as the Akal Bunga, is the seat of temporal and doi.org/10.3390/rel12060390 spiritual authority of the Sikh tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Punjab Community Profile
    Punjabi Community Profile July 2016 Punjab Background The Punjabis are an ethnic group of Indo-Aryan peoples, originating from the Punjab region, found in Pakistan and northern India. Punjab literally means the land of five waters (Persian: panj (“five”) ab (“waters”)). The name of the region was introduced by the Turko-Persian conquerors of India and more formally popularized during the Mughal Empire. Punjab is often referred to as the breadbasket in both Pakistan and India. The coalescence of the various tribes, castes and the inhabitants of the Punjab into a broader common “Punjabi” identity initiated from the onset of the 18th century CE. Prior to that the sense and perception of a common “Punjabi” ethno-cultural identity and community did not exist, even though the majority of the various communities of the Punjab had long shared linguistic, cultural and racial commonalities. Traditionally, Punjabi identity is primarily linguistic, geographical and cultural. Its identity is independent of historical origin or religion, and refers to those who reside in the Punjab region, or associate with its population, and those who consider the Punjabi language their mother tongue. Integration and assimilation are important parts of Punjabi culture, since Punjabi identity is not based solely on tribal connections. More or less all Punjabis share the same cultural background. Historically, the Punjabi people were a heterogeneous group and were subdivided into a number of clans called biradari (literally meaning “brotherhood”) or tribes, with each person bound to a clan. However, Punjabi identity also included those who did not belong to any of the historical tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of External Affairs Lok
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO.302 TO BE ANSWERED ON 07.12.2016 EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS †*302. SHRI KRUPAL BALAJI TUMANE: DR. SATYAPAL SINGH: Will the Minister of EXTERNAL AFFAIRS be pleased to state: (a) the number of Indian civil/fishermen prisoners and Pakistani civil/fishermen prisoners released by Pakistan and India respectively during the last three years; (b) the number of such Indian prisoners still in the Pakistani jails and vice-versa; (c) whether the cases of torture/death of such Indian prisoners in Pakistani jails have come to the notice of the Government during the said period; (d) if so, the details thereof and action taken by the Government in such cases; and (e) the steps taken by the Government to release all the prisoners by both the countries? ANSWER THE MINISTER FOR EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (SHRIMATI SUSHMA SWARAJ) (a) to (e) A statement is laid on the table of the House. ***** STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a) to (e) OF THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 302 REGARDING “EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS” FOR ANSWER ON 07.12.2016 The number of Indian civil prisoners and fishermen released by Pakistan and Pakistani civil prisoners and fishermen released by India, in the last three years is as follows: 2013 2014 2015 Indian civil prisoners released by 38 6 5 Pakistan Indian fishermen released by Pakistan 390 185 448 Pakistani civil prisoners released by 38 26 44 India Pakistani fishermen released by India 28 74 115 Further in the calendar year 2016, Government released 10 Pakistani Civil prisoners and 9 Pakistani Fishermen and Government of Pakistan released 190 Indian Fishermen and 2 Indian Civil prisoners, so far.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Sikhism and Hinduism
    A Comparative Study of Sikhism and Hinduism A Comparative Study of Sikhism and Hinduism Dr Jagraj Singh A publication of Sikh University USA Copyright Dr. Jagraj Singh 1 A Comparative Study of Sikhism and Hinduism A comparative study of Sikhism and Hinduism Contents Page Acknowledgements 4 Foreword Introduction 5 Chapter 1 What is Sikhism? 9 What is Hinduism? 29 Who are Sikhs? 30 Who are Hindus? 33 Who is a Sikh? 34 Who is a Hindu? 35 Chapter 2 God in Sikhism. 48 God in Hinduism. 49 Chapter 3 Theory of creation of universe---Cosmology according to Sikhism. 58 Theory of creation according to Hinduism 62 Chapter 4 Scriptures of Sikhism 64 Scriptures of Hinduism 66 Chapter 5 Sikh place of worship and worship in Sikhism 73 Hindu place of worship and worship in Hinduism 75 Sign of invocation used in Hinduism Sign of invocation used in Sikhism Chapter 6 Hindu Ritualism (Karm Kanda) and Sikh view 76 Chapter 7 Important places of Hindu pilgrimage in India 94 Chapter 8 Hindu Festivals 95 Sikh Festivals Chapter 9 Philosophy of Hinduism---Khat Darsan 98 Philosophy of Sikhism-----Gur Darshan / Gurmat 99 Chapter 10 Panjabi language 103 Chapter 11 The devisive caste system of Hinduism and its rejection by Sikhism 111 Chapter 12 Religion and Character in Sikhism------Ethics of Sikhism 115 Copyright Dr. Jagraj Singh 2 A Comparative Study of Sikhism and Hinduism Sexual morality in Sikhism Sexual morality in Hinduism Religion and ethics of Hinduism Status of woman in Hinduism Chapter13 Various concepts of Hinduism and the Sikh view 127 Chapter 14 Rejection of authority of scriptures of Hinduism by Sikhism 133 Chapter 15 Sacraments of Hinduism and Sikh view 135 Chapter 16 Yoga (Yogic Philosophy of Hinduism and its rejection in Sikhism 142 Chapter 17 Hindu mythology and Sikh view 145 Chapter 18 Un-Sikh and anti-Sikh practices and their rejection 147 Chapter 19 Sikhism versus other religious aystems 149 Glossary of common terms used in Sikhism 154 Bibliography 160 Copyright Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE Review of Books: Book Review: Royals and Rebels: the Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire by Priya Atwal Page 1 of 3
    LSE Review of Books: Book Review: Royals and Rebels: The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire by Priya Atwal Page 1 of 3 Book Review: Royals and Rebels: The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire by Priya Atwal In Royals and Rebels: The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire, Priya Atwal offers a new study that convincingly pushes against the historiography that has positioned the Sikh Empire as a one-man enterprise, delving deep into archival sources to reveal the rich, energetic and flawed lives of the Punjabi royal elite as they tried to carve out their dynastic place in India during the first half of the nineteenth century. The book is a tour-de-force, finds Diya Gupta, with the clarity and authority of Atwal’s writing and her careful reading of historical material succeeding in revealing the contingencies of the past in all its complexity. Royals and Rebels: The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire. Priya Atwal. Hurst. 2020. Ik si rajah, ik si rani, Dono margeh, khatam kahaani! Once there was a King, once there was a Queen, Both died, and there the story ends! Priya Atwal’s Royals and Rebels: The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire alludes to this humorous Punjabi couplet, only to highlight the book’s own impulse for resurrection. In Atwal’s deft hands, it is not simply a king and a queen who are reborn, but Shere-e- Punjab or the ‘Lion of Punjab’, Ranjit Singh himself, juxtaposed against the agency of his family – sons, grandsons, mothers-in-law and wives.
    [Show full text]
  • Iu\I-+L Beinart
    Batwara: Partition and the City of Amritsar by Pitamber P. Sahni Diploma in Architecture (1999) Sushant School of Art and Architecture, Gurgaon, India Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2003 JUL 0 2 2003 LIBRARIgES © 2003 Pitamber P. Sahni. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Department of Architecture May 22, 2003 Certified by JJu in Beinart Professor of Architecture Thesis Advisor Accepted by Iu\i-+l Beinart Chairman, Department Comt tee on Graduate Students ROTCH Readers: Alice H. Amsden Barton L. Weller Professor of Political Economy Department of Urban Studies and Planning Heghnar Watenpaugh Assistant Professor of the History of Architecture Department of Architecture Batwara: Partition and the City of Amritsar )y Pitaiber P. Sahni Submiitted to the Department of Architectutire inl Partial FulfiInent of the Requiremen ts for the Degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies ABSTRACT The Partition of British India into the two dominions of India and Pakistan on August 1 5th 1947 left in its wake the largest human migration of the twentieth century with the transfer of twelve million people across two newly formed borders. The boundary line, demarcating Indian and Pakistani territory, was created 17 miles to the west of Amritsar awarding the city to India. Amritsar, a flourishing commercial and cultural center, thus, became a border city overnight on the Indian side.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC COPY and Immigration
    8 4 U.S. Department of Homeland Security identifying Js*d deleted to 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 pment zii.z,ri y unw 2:-anted Washington, DC 20529 invasion of pe':~~a1~SV%C~ U. S. Citizenship PUBLIC COPY and Immigration IN RE: APPLICATION: Application for Waiver of the Foreign Residence Requirement under Section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; 8 U.S.C. 5 1182(e). ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. uertP. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office Page 2 DISCUSSION: The waiver application was denied by the Director, California Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The matter will be remanded to the Director to request a section 212(e) waiver recommendation from the Director, U.S. Department of State (DOS), Waiver Review Division (WRD). The applicant is a native and citizen of India who was admitted to the United States to participate in graduate medical training in July 2004. He is thus subject to the two-year foreign residence requirement under section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1182(e).' The applicant presently seeks a waiver of his two-year foreign residence requirement, based on the claim that his U.S. citizen child, born in March 2005, would suffer exceptional hardship if he moved to India temporarily with the applicant and in the alternative, if he remained in the United States while the applicant fulfilled his two-year foreign residence requirement in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Kashmir Stop India's Rise? Sumit Ganguly
    Will Kashmir Stop India's Rise? Sumit Ganguly BREAKING AWAY OVER THE past several years, India's economic growth, diplomatic influence, and overall prestige have increased sharply. The country's new international profile adds a fresh dimension to its ongoing clash with Pakistan over Kashmir. So far, the conflict has not hindered India's rise. But the prospects that the two sides will reach a settle- ment on their own are dim. Although it is unlikely that the issue will frustrate India's am- bitions to emerge as an Asian-and a global-power, periodic crises over the state will distract India's leaders, and tensions with Pakistan could spark yet another war. The United States can, and should, play a role in facilitating an end to the conflict by prodding both sides to reach an accord. Doing so will require that Wash- ington change its stance toward both India and Pakistan, but the potential rewards-peace on the subcontinent and a solid strategic partnership between Washington and New Delhi-are well worth the effort. The dispute over Kashmir has dogged relations between India and Pakistan since the states were created by the partition of British India in 1947. The two countries have fought three wars (in 1947-48, 1965, and 1999) over the issue and related matters; twice (in 199o and 2001-2) they nearly resorted to the use of nuclear weapons. SUMIT GANGULY is Rabindranath Tagore Chair of Indian Cultures and Civilizations and Professor of Political Science at Indiana University in Bloomington. [45] Sumit Ganguly Intense international concern has prompted multilateral efforts to broker a formal conclusion to the dispute.
    [Show full text]