DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining the Specificity of Fish-Habitat Relationships in Western Port

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining the Specificity of Fish-Habitat Relationships in Western Port CENTRE FOR AQUATIC POLLUTION IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL REPORT #26 DETERMINING THE SPECIFICITY OF FISH-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS IN WESTERN PORT Determining the specificity of fish-habitat relationships in Western Port Greg Jenkins, Tim Kenner, Andrew Brown August 2013 1 CENTRE FOR AQUATIC POLLUTION IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL REPORT #26 DETERMINING THE SPECIFICITY OF FISH-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS IN WESTERN PORT Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Study Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 10 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................................................. 12 Sampling Locations .................................................................................................................................. 12 Sampling Methods .................................................................................................................................... 12 Stereo video sampling .......................................................................................................................... 12 Mini Otter Trawl Sampling .................................................................................................................. 13 Laboratory Methods ................................................................................................................................. 13 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 18 Underwater Stereo video .......................................................................................................................... 18 Mini Otter Trawl ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................................... 52 Specificity of fish habitat relationships in Western Port .......................................................................... 52 Resilience of fish populations to habitat loss through the use of alternative habitats .............................. 54 Understanding and Refinement of Asset Areas from the Perspective of Fish Biodiversity ..................... 55 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................. 56 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 58 References .................................................................................................................................................... 59 2 CENTRE FOR AQUATIC POLLUTION IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL REPORT #26 DETERMINING THE SPECIFICITY OF FISH-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS IN WESTERN PORT List of Figures Figure 1. Habitats recorded by underwater survey in Western Port (Blake et al. 2012). A. Amphibolis antarctica , B. Caulerpa cactoides , C. Rhodolith bed, D. Reef with macroalgae, E. Invertebrate (Bryozoan) isolate................................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2. Sampling Locations in Western Port. Stars, Amphibolis habitat; Cross, reef-macroalgae; Circles, Sendentary invertebrate isolates; Triangles, Caulerpa habitat; Diamond, Rhodolith beds. ................. 15 Figure 3. Deployment of stereo video camera frame ................................................................................... 16 Figure 4. Diagram of mini otter trawl net employed to sample in Western Port, a) main body of net and liner (net – 38.1 mm aperture knotted nylon; liner - 5 mm aperture knotted nylon); b) codend bag of net and liner (net – 31.75 mm aperture knotted nylon; liner – 3 mm aperture knotless nylon); c) wooden otter-boards – 61 cm x 31 cm weighted with lead sheets; d) tickler chain; e) head rope – 390 cm; f) 4 foam floats; g) foot rope and chain (390 cm); h) bridle ropes; i) alternate retrieval line. ...... 17 Figure 5. Mini otter trawl net deployed in Western Port .............................................................................. 17 Figure 6. Average (±1 SE) Species Number of fish recorded on underwater stereo video .......................... 23 Figure 7. Average (±1 SE) Time in View of total fish recorded on underwater stereo video ...................... 24 Figure 8. Average (±1 SE) Time in View of Sixspine Leatherjacket, Meuschenia freyceneti , recorded on underwater stereo video ........................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 9. Average (±1 SE) Time in View of Weedy Seadragon, Phyllopteryx taeniolatus , recorded on underwater stereo video ........................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 10. Average (±1 SE) Time in View of Bluethroat Wrasse, Notolabrus tetricus, recorded on underwater stereo video ........................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 11. Average (±1 SE) MaxN of total fish recorded on underwater stereo video ............................... 26 Figure 12. nMDS plot of log(x+1) transformed Time in View data for fish recorded on underwater stereo video ..................................................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 13. Average (±1 SE) Length of fish recorded on underwater stereo video ....................................... 28 Figure 14. Length-frequency distributions for total fish recorded on underwater stereo video ................... 29 Figure 15. Length-frequency distributions for Meuschenia freycineti recorded on underwater stereo video .............................................................................................................................................................. 30 Figure 16. Length-frequency distributions for Notolabrus tetricus recorded on underwater stereo video .. 31 Figure 17. Length-frequency distributions for Phyllopteryx taeniolatus recorded on underwater stereo video ..................................................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 18. Length-frequency distributions for Acanthaluteres sp . recorded on underwater stereo video ... 33 Figure 19. Average (±1 SE) species number of fish collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 20. Average (±1 SE) abundance of total fish collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 21. Average (±1 SE) abundance of leatherjackets, Acanthaluteres sp., collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ....................................................................... 42 Figure 22. Average (±1 SE) abundance of Cobbler, Gymnapistes marmoratus , collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ............................................................ 43 Figure 23. Average (±1 SE) abundance of Little Weed Whiting, Neoodax balteatus , collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ............................................................ 43 Figure 24. Average (±1 SE) abundance of Spotted Pipefish, Stigmatopora argus , collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ............................................................. 44 3 CENTRE FOR AQUATIC POLLUTION IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL REPORT #26 DETERMINING THE SPECIFICITY OF FISH-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS IN WESTERN PORT Figure 25. Average (±1 SE) abundance of Grass Whiting, Haletta semifasciata , collected by mini otter trawl. NB Hastings-SG location was only sampled in autumn ............................................................. 44 Figure 26. nMDS plot of log(x+1) transformed abundance of fish collected by mini otter trawl ................ 45 Figure 27. Average (±1 SE) length of fish collected by mini otter trawl ..................................................... 46 Figure 28. Length-frequency distributions for total fish collected by mini otter trawl ................................ 47 Figure 29. Length-frequency distributions for Stigmatopora argus collected by mini otter trawl .............. 48 Figure 30. Length-frequency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sydney Harbour: What We Do and Do Not Know About a Highly Diverse Estuary
    Marine and Freshwater Research 2015, 66, 1073-1087 © CSIRO 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF15159_AC Supplementary material Sydney Harbour: what we do and do not know about a highly diverse estuary E. L. JohnstonA,B, M. Mayer-PintoA,B, P. A. HutchingsC, E. M. MarzinelliA,B,D, S. T. AhyongC, G. BirchE, D. J. BoothF, R. G. CreeseG, M. A. DoblinH, W. FigueiraI, P. E. GribbenB,D, T. PritchardJ, M. RoughanK, P. D. SteinbergB,D and L. H. HedgeA,B AEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. BSydney Institute of Marine Science, 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia. CAustralian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. DCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. ESchool of GeoSciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FCentre for Environmental Sustainability, School of the Environment, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. GNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, Nelson Bay, NSW 2315, Australia. HPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia. ICentre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. JWater and Coastal Science Section, New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box A290, Sydney, NSW 1232, Australia. KCoastal and Regional Oceanography Lab, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Shallow Reef Fish Assemblages in Western Australia Using a Rapid Censusing Technique
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 20: 247-270 (2001). Biodiversity of shallow reef fish assemblages in Western Australia using a rapid censusing technique J. Harry Hutchins Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia email: [email protected] Abstract -A rapid assessment methodology was used to provide relative abundance data on selected families of Western Australian fishes. Twenty shallow water reef sites were surveyed covering the coastline between the Recherche Archipelago in the south east and the Kimberley in the north. Three groups of atolls located off the Kimberley coast were also included. Eighteen families that best represent the State's nearshore reef fish fauna were targeted. They are: Serranidae, Caesionidae, Lu~anidae, Haemulidae, Lethrinidae, Mullidae, Pempherididae, Kyphosidae, Girellidae, Scorpididae, Chaetodontidae, Pomacanthidae, Pomacentridae, Cheilodactylidae, Labridae, Odacidae, Acanthuridae, and Monacanthidae. Analysis of the dataset using a hierarchical classification technique indicates that four groups of reef fishes are present: a southwest assemblage, a northwest assemblage, an offshore atolls assemblage, and a Kimberley assemblage. The first assemblage is comprised mainly of temperate species, while the latter three are mostly tropical fishes; these two broader groupings narrowly overlap on the west coast between Kalbarri and the Houtman Abrolhos. Evidence of a wide zone of temperate/tropical overlap-as proposed by some previous studies-is not supported by this analysis, nor is the presence of a prominent subtropical fauna on the west coast. Ecological differences of the four assemblages are explored, as well as the impact by the Leeuwin Current on this arrangement. INTRODUCTION western and southern coasts of the State, but could Western Australia occupies about 23 degrees of only provide a brief comparison with other more latitude (12-35°5) covering a large and varied northern areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Harbour a Systematic Review of the Science 2014
    Sydney Harbour A systematic review of the science 2014 Sydney Institute of Marine Science Technical Report The Sydney Harbour Research Program © Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 2014 This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. Disclaimer The authors of this report are members of the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Institute of Marine Science and represent various universities, research institutions and government agencies. The views presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of The Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the authors other affiliated institutions listed below. This report is a review of other literature written by third parties. Neither the Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the affiliated institutions take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability, and correctness of any information included in this report provided in third party sources. Recommended Citation Hedge L.H., Johnston E.L., Ayoung S.T., Birch G.F., Booth D.J., Creese R.G., Doblin M.A., Figueira W.F., Gribben P.E., Hutchings P.A., Mayer Pinto M, Marzinelli E.M., Pritchard T.R., Roughan M., Steinberg P.D., 2013, Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloging-in-Publication entry ISBN: 978-0-646-91493-0 Publisher: The Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Available on the internet from www.sims.org.au For further information please contact: SIMS, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW 2088 Australia T: +61 2 9435 4600 F: +61 2 9969 8664 www.sims.org.au ABN 84117222063 Cover Photo | Mike Banert North Head The light was changing every minute.
    [Show full text]
  • REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY on KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program
    2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources ManagementDate2007 Board Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board REEF FISH BIODIVERSITYKangaroo Island Natural ON Resources KANGAROO Management ISLAND Board SEAGRASS FAUNAL BIODIVERSITYREPORT TITLE ON KI Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 1 REEF FISH BIODIVERSITY ON KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program A report prepared for the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board by Daniel Brock Martine Kinloch December 2007 Reef Fish Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island 2 Oceans of Blue The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. The Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. Project Officer Contact Details Martine Kinloch Coast and Marine Program Manager Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4312 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Contact Details Jeanette Gellard General Manager PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4340 Fax: (08) 8553 4399 Email: [email protected] © Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 415 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 415 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 416 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO BOX 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Information Systems and Database Support Program Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 416 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R.. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the South East NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000681-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of the Yellowspotted Puffer Torquigener Flavimaculosus (Osteichthyes: Tetraodontidae) from Gulf of Suez, Egypt
    Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ISSN 1110 – 6131 Vol. 23(3): 503 – 511 (2019) www.ejabf.journals.ekb.eg Reproductive biology of the Yellowspotted Puffer Torquigener flavimaculosus (Osteichthyes: Tetraodontidae) from Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Amal M. Ramadan* and Magdy M. Elhalfawy Fish reproduction and spawning laboratory, Aquaculture Division, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: The present study assesses reproductive biology of Yellowspotted Received: May 1, 2019 Puffer Torquigener flavimaculosus, were collected seasonally from Accepted: Aug. 29, 2019 commercial catches at the Attaka fishing harbor in Suez from winter 2017 Online: Sept. 2019 until autumn 2018. The sex ratio was found 1:1.08 for male and female, _______________ respectively. The fish length at first sexual maturity (L50) was 8.2 cm for males and 9.5 cm for females. In addition, the allometric pattern of gonadal Keywords: growth was studied to validate the use of the gonado-somatic index (GSI) in Gulf Suez assessments of the reproductive cycle. The highest peak of GSI (10.5 ± T. flavimaculosus 1.012%) and (4.3 ± 0.084%) for female and male were recorded in summer, Yellowspotted Puffer respectively. Values for hepato-somatic index (HSI) is very high and strong Gonado-somatic index inverse relationship with gonado-somatic index (GSI) we inferred that lipid Hepato-somatic index reserves in the liver play an important role in gonad maturation and Somatic condition factor spawning. Somatic condition factor (Kr) also varied, albeit less so, Spawning throughout the year, suggesting that body fat and muscle play lesser roles in providing energy for reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Victoria Technical Series No
    Deakin Research Online This is the published version: Barton, Jan, Pope, Adam and Howe, Steffan 2012, Marine protected areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf bioregions Parks Victoria, Melbourne, Vic. Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047221 Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner. Copyright: 2012, Parks Victoria. Parks Victoria Technical Paper Series No. 79 Marine Natural Values Study (Vol 2) Marine Protected Areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Jan Barton, Adam Pope and Steffan Howe* School of Life & Environmental Sciences Deakin University *Parks Victoria August 2012 Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 79 Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Marine Natural Values Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Along Victoria’s coastline there are 30 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that have been established to protect the state’s significant marine environmental and cultural values. These MPAs include 13 Marine National Parks (MNPs), 11 Marine Sanctuaries (MSs), 3 Marine and Coastal Parks, 2 Marine Parks, and a Marine Reserve, and together these account for 11.7% of the Victorian marine environment. The highly protected Marine National Park System, which is made up of the MNPs and MSs, covers 5.3% of Victorian waters and was proclaimed in November 2002. This system has been designed to be representative of the diversity of Victoria’s marine environment and aims to conserve and protect ecological processes, habitats, and associated flora and fauna. The Marine National Park System is spread across Victoria’s five marine bioregions with multiple MNPs and MSs in each bioregion, with the exception of Flinders bioregion which has one MNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanisms Leading to Ontogenetic Diet Shift in A
    Animal Cells and Systems Vol. 16, No. 4, August 2012, 343Á349 The mechanisms leading to ontogenetic diet shift in a microcanivore, Pterogobius elapoides (Gobiidae) Seung-Ho Choia and Ho Young Sukb* aDepartment of Animal Resources, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 404-708, Korea; bDepartment of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan Gyeongsangbuk-do 712-749, Korea (Received 4 December 2011; received in revised form 27 January 2012; accepted 13 February 2012) A variety of fish species undergo an ontogenetic change in prey selectivity, and several potentially interacting factors, including nutrient requirement, microhabitat change, and foraging ability, may account for the occurrence of the shift. Here we examine the foraging ecology and ontogenetic diet shift of a micro-carnivorous goby, Pterogobius elapoides (serpentine goby), dominant component of fish assemblage in shallow rocky areas off the coast in Korea and Japan. Although most other gobies are primarily benthic carnivores, P. elapoides is a semipelagic fish; however, little is known about how those species change their foraging tactics with growth. In our diet analyses, the most common diet was pelagic copepods and benthic amphipods, and diet shift was observed from pelagic to benthic with growth. The ontogenetic diet shift seems to be the result of the preference for energetically more profitable prey in larger-size classes as well as the results of different prey availability due to among-habitat variation in diet. However, differential food preference does not appear to affect individual scope for searching food. Several factors such as predation pressures and interspecific resource partitioning might contribute to the changes in diet observed among size classes, which were included in our ongoing tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Inshore Habitats Around Tasmania for Life History
    National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry Jordan, Alan Richard, 1964- Assessment of inshore habitats around Tasmania for life-history stages of commercial finfish species Bibliography ISBN 0 646 36875 3. 1. Marine fishes - Tasmania - Habitat. 2. Marine fishes - Tasmania - Development. I. Jordan, Alan, 1964 - . II. Tasmania Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. 597.5609946 Published by the Marine Research Laboratories - Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania 1998 Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Taroona, Tasmania 7053 Phone: (03) 6227 7277 Fax: (03) 62 27 8035 The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Marine Research Laboratories or the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. ASSESSMENT OF INSHORE HABITATS AROUND TASMANIA FOR LIFE-HISTORY STAGES OF COMMERCIAL FINFISH SPECIES A.R. Jordan, D.M. Mills, G. Ewing and J.M. Lyle December 1998 FRDC Project No. 94/037 Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Assessment of inshore habitats for finfish in Tasmania 94/037 Assessment of inshore habitats around Tasmania for life-history stages of commercial finfish species. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Dr A. R. Jordan and Dr J. M. Lyle ADDRESS: Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute Marine Research Laboratories Taroona, Tasmania 7053 Phone: (03) 62 277 277 Fax: (03) 62 278 035 Email: [email protected] OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the abundance and distribution of commercial fish species associated with selected inshore soft-bottom habitats around Tasmania. 2. To categorise the habitat types in these areas and determine the size/age structure of commercial fish species by habitat as a means of assessing the critical habitat requirements of such species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-03551 Olds, A
    Ecography ECOG-03551 Olds, A. D., Frohloff, B. A., Gilby, B. L., Connolly, R. M., Yabsley, N. A., Maxwell, P. S., Henderson, C. J. and Schlacher, T. A. 2018. Urbanisation supplements ecosystem functioning in disturbed estuaries. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.03551 Supplementary material Appendix 1, Table,A1."L ocation,"seascape"characteristics"and"water"quality"of"each"of"the"22"estuaries"sampled."Estuaries"are"ordered"to" reflect"their"distribution"from"north"to"south"across"southeast"Queensland."Seascape"characteristics"(i.e."hardened"shore," mangrove"area,"mouth"width"and"length)"were"calculated"for"the"entire"sampled"section"of"each"estuaryB"water"quality"variables"are" averages"for"this"same"reach." Estuary, Latitude, Longitude, Hardened, Mangrove,area, Mouth,width, Length,(m), Salinity, Turbidity,(NTU), ChlorophyllEa, shore,(%)! (km2), (m), (ppt), (mg/L), Noosa", 26°22'S" 153°"04'E" 10.07" 0.75" 210" 3785" 35.52" 1.02" 0.33" Maroochy, 26°38'S" 153°"06'E" 9.67" 0.96" 191" 6667" 35.63" 1.74" 0.95" Mooloolah, 26°40’S" 153°"08'E" 51.05" 0.32" 102" 7790" 34.48" 1.47" 1.54" Bells, 26°50'S" 153°"06'E" 4.15" 0.38" 160" 6345" 29.01" 6.13" 0.70" Westaways, 26°53'S" 153°"05'E" 0.00" 0.31" 40" 1230" 31.33" 14.72" 0.25" Tripcony, 26°58'S" 153°"04'E" 0.00" 4.30" 560" 2480" 34.52" 5.21" 1.83" Coochin, 26°54'S" 153°"04'E" 0.14" 1.47" 161" 2690" 31.48" 9.46" 0.60" Caboolture, 27°"09'S" 153°"02'E" 0.50" 3.64" 312" 5440" 33.47" 3.82" 0.64" Saltwater, 27°14'S" 153°"03’E" 4.64" 4.18" 627" 4034" 35.38" 6.93" 1.21" Pine, 27°16'S" 153°"02'E" 10.89" 6.55"
    [Show full text]