DOCSLIB.ORG

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Panel Submission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Panel Submission Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, Stz’uminus First Nation Cowichan Nation Alliance Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL 2 PANEL SUBMISSION Stz'uminus First Nation June 6, 2019 Dear Chair Beaudet, Dr. Levy, and Dr. Steyn On behalf of Cowichan Tribes, Stz'uminus First Nation, and Halalt First Nation, please accept our submission to your Panel regarding the potential impacts of the Roberts Bank Terminal 2 (RBT2) project on the culture and livelihood of our communities. As member communities of the Cowichan Nation, and active representatives of the Cowichan Nation Alliance (CNA), our submission to you - the Panel - is part of a sustained effort on our part to ensure and reinforce our asserted Aboriginal Rights and Title, which extend into and beyond the RBT2 project area. How decisions are reached on projects such as these reflect the process and progress of reconciliation, including how the principles of the United Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Section 35 of Canada's own Constitution Act 1982, and first and foremost our indigenous laws and protocols are upheld. The proposed Roberts Bank Terminal 2 project and the associated vessel traffic have potential to impact the ability of our communities to exercise their Aboriginal Rights to fish and harvest and threatens to further alienate our cultural connection with the land, water, and all living things in the Salish Sea, including the threatened Southern Resident Killer Whales. This submission contains further detail on the impacts this project could bring to our communities and concerns around the methodology of the Environmental Impact Statement used to assess those impacts. We are greatly concerned with both the scientific approach to the assessment as well as the understanding of Indigenous values; assessing a project's impacts is a subjective, value-laden process that requires a deep understanding of what our Aboriginal practices mean to the sustainability of our communities and our culture, and how critical that is to our wellbeing. We ask that you review this submission with an open mind and an open heart, and consider it's impacts in the context of all industrial and vessel activity in the Salish Sea that is impeding our ability to practice our culture. Huy tseep q'u <Original signed by> <Original signed by> <Original signed by> Chief John Elliot Chief William Seymour Chief James Thomas Stz'uminus First Nation Cowichan Tribes Halalt First Nation Page 1 Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL 2 PANEL SUBMISSION Stz’uminus First Nation Table of Contents 1. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. The Cowichan Nation .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Marine Territory ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.3. Community Profiles ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1. Halalt First Nation ................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2. Cowichan Tribes .................................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Stz’uminus First Nation ................................................................................................................. 7 2. Impacts to Cowichan Nation Aboriginal Rights, Cultural Values, and Traditional Use ......................... 8 2.1. Fishing and the Impacts of Vessel Traffic ...................................................................................... 9 2.1. Q’ullhanumutsun (Southern Resident Killer Whales) and the Impacts of Vessel Traffic ............ 14 2.1. Other Marine Mammals ............................................................................................................. 16 2.2. Marine Harvesting and the Impacts of Vessel Wake Erosion ..................................................... 16 2.3. Shore Birds and the Impacts of the Project Footprint ................................................................ 19 2.4. Ecosystem Integrity and the Impacts of Invasive Species ........................................................... 19 3. Concerns regarding Vessel Incidents, Malfunctions, and Spills .......................................................... 20 3.1. Container Vessel Casualty Measures .......................................................................................... 20 3.2. Spill Response to Heavy Bunker Fuel Oil ..................................................................................... 21 3.3. Shoreline Cleanup for Oil, Hazardous Materials, and Container Debris ..................................... 21 3.4. Financial Risk and Compensation ............................................................................................... 22 4. Concerns Regarding the Assessment Process ..................................................................................... 23 4.1. Project-related marine shipping geographic scope .................................................................... 23 4.2. Cumulative Effects ...................................................................................................................... 23 4.3. Number of Vessels vs. Size of Vessels ......................................................................................... 24 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 26 5.1. Governance ................................................................................................................................. 26 5.2. Studies and Monitoring............................................................................................................... 26 5.3. Accommodation .......................................................................................................................... 26 6. References .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Page 2 Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL 2 PANEL SUBMISSION Stz’uminus First Nation Appendices Appendix A: Cowichan Nation Alliance Declaration for Reconciliation Appendix B: Port Metro Vancouver: Roberts Bank Terminal 2: Cowichan Occupation and Use Page 3 Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL 2 PANEL SUBMISSION Stz’uminus First Nation 1. Background 1.1. The Cowichan Nation The Cowichan Nation is comprised of the modern-day Hul’qumi’num speaking Indian Bands of Cowichan Tribes, Stz’uminus First Nation, Halalt First Nation, Penelakut Tribe, and Lyackson First Nation. Given the historic cultural and familial ties between the modern-day bands mentioned above, it is common practice for our communities to work together in a variety of combinations on different issues relating to our Aboriginal Rights and Title. As such, this Panel Submission is on behalf of the communities of Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, and Stz’uminus First Nation as the Cowichan Nation Alliance, while our neighbours Lyackson and Penelakut will be engaging in the Robert’s Bank Terminal 2 process independently, but with our full support. This approach does not detract from our strong history and our strong relationships currently. The historic Cowichan Nation was an aboriginal people, nation or group before at and after the assertion of Crown sovereignty over British Columbia in 1846 (the relevant date for aboriginal title) and European contact in the early 1790s (the relevant date for aboriginal rights). Throughout all of these times, the Cowichan Nation exclusively occupied the permanent village and fishing station of Tl’uqtinus, located on Lulu Island. Our dominant presence at Tl’uqtinus permitted us to engage in extensive and year-round fishing activities, as well as in the full suite of other land-based and water-based activities throughout the surrounding areas, such as hunting for sea mammals, bird hunting, and aquatic and terrestrial plant harvesting. The historic permanent village site of Tl’uqtinus is extensively documented in both oral history and European records. To this end, Cowichan Tribes, Stz’uminus First Nation, Penelakut Tribe, and Halalt First Nation are currently litigating their Title Claim to the village site location, on behalf of the Cowichan Nation and with support from Lyackson First Nation. The Cowichan Nation Alliance has issued a Declaration for Reconciliation for the Tl’uqtinus village site, outlining the intent to recover Crown-owned Tl’uqtinus lands in order to re-establish a permanent residence on the historic village lands and the associated re-establishment of cultural practices and economic participation (see Appendix A for full Declaration). As a consequence, we have an exceptionally strong and demonstrable aboriginal right to fish, harvest, and hunt the waters at the proposed Roberts Bank Terminal 2 project, specifically in the Local Assessment Area (LAA) and a significant portion of the Regional Assessment Area (RAA), as well as nearby (e.g. the south arm of the Fraser River). For a number of years,
Recommended publications
  • First Nations Nutrition and Health Conference

    First Nations Nutrition and Health Conference

    First Nations Nutrition and Health Conference Proceedings Alfred Wong, Editor June 19 - 20, 2003 Recreation Centre, 100 Lower Capilano Road, Squamish Nation Sponsored by Friends of Aboriginal Health 2 Notice The Friends of Aboriginal Health through a copyright agreement with Arbokem Inc. permits the unlimited use of the content of the proceedings of the First Nations Nutrition and Health Conference, for the non-commercial promotion of health and wellness among the people of the First Nations. ISBN: 0-929020-02-3 © Arbokem Inc., Vancouver, Canada, 2003-2004 www.aboriginalhealth.net Printed in Canada AK25818W2 Proceedings of the First Nations Nutrition and Health Conference, 2003 3 Table of Content Page Notice 2 Table of Content 3 Foreword 5 Conference Program 6 Time for justice, sovereignty and health after more than 200 years of foreign 8 colonization and cultural destruction. Ovide Mercredi The Present Status of Aboriginal Health in British Columbia. Lydia Hwitsum 9 Health of the people and community. Gerald Amos 16 Loss of Use of a Traditional Fishery – The Kitamaat Eulachon. Michael Gordon 17 Wellness Governing Mode: The Union of Our Two Worlds and Traditional 18 Knowledge. Andy Carvill and David Anthony Ravensdale Environmental Impact on Food and Lifestyle. :Wik Tna A Seq Nakoo (Ida John) 19 “Our Food is Our Medicine”: Traditional Plant Foods, Traditional Ecological 22 Knowledge and Health in a Changing Environment. Nancy J. Turner and Rosemary Ommer Acculturation and natural food sources of a coastal community. Wata (Christine 40 Joseph) Impact of Fish Farming on the Natural Food Resources of 41 First Nations People. Sergio Paone Overall Health - Mental, Emotional, Spiritual and Physical Aspects.
  • ROYAL OAK HERITAGE TOUR – Main Street General Information

    ROYAL OAK HERITAGE TOUR – Main Street General Information

    ROYAL OAK HERITAGE TOUR – Main Street General Information: Royal Oak Pioneers 1858 – Richard & Jane Cheeseman family were the first to settle in the Royal Oak area. James Murray Yale Henry & Eliza Peers owned land in the area 1852, but didn’t move to the area until 1858. 1859 - Alexander Grant Dallas 1873 – Louis Duval 1891 – Robert Patterson Rithet 1900 – Frederick and William & Esther Quick Transportation & Access In 1863 a daily coach service from Victoria was implemented, leaving from the city in the morning by way of the west road to North Saanich and returning in the evening by the east road. Access from Victoria was up Quadra to West Saanich Road and East Saanich Road (Veiwmont now) Victoria & Sidney Railway Inaugural run was in 1894. There was a station called Glanford and a station here at Royal Oak. At the stretch along the Royal Oak Shopping Centre the V&S rail ran along the west side of West Saanich road. Royal Oak Station was at the corner of West Saanich Road and East Saanich Road (now Viewmont Avenue). The V&S would drop off mail and supplies. The engines ran on burning cordwood. Locals called it the Cordwood Ltd. as it also transported cordwood to Victoria from the settlers on the peninsula. A large number of pioneers supplemented their farming with the sale of cordwood. The rail line entered Royal Oak from the south approximately at a location where the intersection of Glanford Ave and W. Saanich Road is today. The rail line then climbed the long slope to a ridge that lead to Beaver and Elk Lakes.
  • Songhees Pictorial

    Songhees Pictorial

    Songhees Pictorial A History ofthe Songhees People as seen by Outsiders, 1790 - 1912 by Grant Keddie Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, 2003. 175pp., illus., maps, bib., index. $39.95. ISBN 0-7726-4964-2. I remember making an appointment with Dan Savard in or­ der to view the Sali sh division ofthe provincial museum's photo collections. After some security precautions, I was ushered into a vast room ofcabi nets in which were the ethnological photographs. One corner was the Salish division- fairly small compared with the larger room and yet what a goldmine of images. [ spent my day thumbing through pictures and writing down the numbers name Songhees appeared. Given the similarity of the sounds of of cool photos I wished to purchase. It didn't take too long to some of these names to Sami sh and Saanich, l would be more cau­ see that I could never personally afford even the numbers I had tious as to whom is being referred. The oldest journal reference written down at that point. [ was struck by the number of quite indicating tribal territory in this area is the Galiano expedi tion excellent photos in the collection, which had not been published (Wagner 1933). From June 5th to June 9th 1792, contact was to my knowledge. I compared this with the few photos that seem maintained with Tetacus, a Makah tyee who accompanied the to be published again and again. Well, Grant Keddie has had expedi tion to his "seed gathering" village at Esquimalt Harbour. access to this intriguing collection, with modern high-resolution At this time, Victoria may have been in Makah territory or at least scanning equipment, and has prepared this edited collecti on fo r high-ranking marriage alliances gave them access to the camus our v1ewmg.
  • Environmental Impact Study Stage 1 Final – Rev 0

    Environmental Impact Study Stage 1 Final – Rev 0

    202 - 2780 Veterans Memorial Parkway Victoria, BC, V9B 3S6 Phone: 778-433-2672 web: www.greatpacific.ca E-Mail: [email protected] COWICHAN VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT MARINE DISCHARGE OUTFALL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY STAGE 1 FINAL – REV 0 Attention: Cowichan Valley Regional District 175 Ingram Street Duncan, BC V9L 1N8 June 25, 2015 1019-001 REV 0 Cowichan Valley Regional District Marine Discharge Outfall - EIS Executive Summary The Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) is undertaking the development of Amendment 3 to the existing Central Sector Liquid Waste Management Plan (CSLWMP). The Central Sector is serviced by the Joint Utilities Board (JUB) Lagoon Systems co-owned by the City of Duncan and the Municipality of North Cowichan, and also provides service to properties within parts of CVRD Electoral Areas D and E and parts of Cowichan Tribes reserve. The Joint Utilities Board (JUB) sewage treatment lagoons are located adjacent to the Cowichan River. The aerated lagoon treatment system produces secondary quality effluent, which is disinfected by chlorination, then dechlorinated. Treated wastewater is discharged into the lower reaches of the Cowichan River and subsequently to the Cowichan Estuary and ocean environment. In recent years, low flows in the Cowichan River have resulted in a situation where there is insufficient dilution of the effluent plume with respect to the river flow. This resulted in the temporary closure of the Cowichan River to recreational activities in August of 2014. It is proposed that the point of discharge be moved from the Cowichan River to the marine environment of Satellite Channel, where significantly more dilution can be achieved and where the likelihood of interaction between the effluent plume and sensitive areas can be reduced.
  • North Cowichan Council

    North Cowichan Council

    —■ -------------- ^EST CITY COUNCIL FOR FALL FAIR HOSPITAL BOARD WaMnnrki Proccedingt—ProUbldan North Cowichan Red Cross—Health NORTH COWICHAN COUNCIL CoaminiosMr on Sdie<< Uqner Welfan Plans Dirtetora Make Progreas on Prize Busy Days Contmuc Chasigea Lial—Camping Site Staff—Nuraea* Teat The report end recommendationt of The committee of the North Cow­ Waste in Road Administration Acknowledged The directors of the Cowichan Agri- the Water committee were adopted by ichan branch. Red Cross Society, met At the meeting of the board of di­ cultural Society on Monday afternoon Duncan city conncil at a meeting held at the Agricultural hall, Duncan, on —Consulting Engineer to be Appointed rectors of the King’s Daughters’ hos­ made considerable progress in com­ on Thursday last. Some time ago the Wednesday of last week, the Rev. F. pital. Duncan, on Wednesday after­ city secured permission from Col. pleting the price list for the Fall Fail. L. Stephenson, president, being in the What with strikes, mishaps to ma­ amazed to find that it had been classed noon of last week, it was decided to chair. The suggestions of the committees Hodgins to use the water at Hooper's chinery, and changes on the outside as wild land for 1920. advertise for a new matron to take dam. which i»above the city’s dam. in charge of cattle, sheep, pigs, dairy It was resolved that a health wel­ He appealed to the qiembers who up her duties on July 1st next. The alteration then made has ad­ fare committee be formed, half of its suff, this year ’s conncil for North produce, honey, ladies* work, girls* knew the acreage, and they agreed it During April there were 56 patients versely affected the operation of the members to be nominated by North Cowichan has had no easy task in work, and domestic science were should be classed as improved.
  • Francophone Historical Context Framework PDF

    Francophone Historical Context Framework PDF

    Francophone Historic Places Historical Context Thematic Framework Canot du nord on the Fraser River. (www.dchp.ca); Fort Victoria c.1860. (City of Victoria); Fort St. James National Historic Site. (pc.gc.ca); Troupe de danse traditionnelle Les Cornouillers. (www. ffcb.ca) September 2019 Francophone Historic Places Historical Context Thematic Framework Francophone Historic Places Historical Context Thematic Framework Table of Contents Historical Context Thematic Framework . 3 Theme 1: Early Francophone Presence in British Columbia 7 Theme 2: Francophone Communities in B.C. 14 Theme 3: Contributing to B.C.’s Economy . 21 Theme 4: Francophones and Governance in B.C. 29 Theme 5: Francophone History, Language and Community 36 Theme 6: Embracing Francophone Culture . 43 In Closing . 49 Sources . 50 2 Francophone Historic Places Historical Context Thematic Framework - cb.com) - Simon Fraser et ses Voya ses et Fraser Simon (tourisme geurs. Historical contexts: Francophone Historic Places • Identify and explain the major themes, factors and processes Historical Context Thematic Framework that have influenced the history of an area, community or Introduction culture British Columbia is home to the fourth largest Francophone community • Provide a framework to in Canada, with approximately 70,000 Francophones with French as investigate and identify historic their first language. This includes places of origin such as France, places Québec, many African countries, Belgium, Switzerland, and many others, along with 300,000 Francophiles for whom French is not their 1 first language. The Francophone community of B.C. is culturally diverse and is more or less evenly spread across the province. Both Francophone and French immersion school programs are extremely popular, yet another indicator of the vitality of the language and culture on the Canadian 2 West Coast.
  • Garibaldi Provincial Park M ASTER LAN P

    Garibaldi Provincial Park M ASTER LAN P

    Garibaldi Provincial Park M ASTER LAN P Prepared by South Coast Region North Vancouver, B.C. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Garibaldi Provincial Park master plan On cover: Master plan for Garibaldi Provincial Park. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-7726-1208-0 1. Garibaldi Provincial Park (B.C.) 2. Parks – British Columbia – Planning. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Parks. South Coast Region. II Title: Master plan for Garibaldi Provincial Park. FC3815.G37G37 1990 33.78”30971131 C90-092256-7 F1089.G3G37 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS GARIBALDI PROVINCIAL PARK Page 1.0 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Plan Purpose 2 2.2 Background Summary 3 3.0 ROLE OF THE PARK 4 3.1 Regional and Provincial Context 4 3.2 Conservation Role 6 3.3 Recreation Role 6 4.0 ZONING 8 5.0 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 11 5.1 Introduction 11 5.2 Natural Resources Management: Objectives/Policies/Actions 11 5.2.1 Land Management 11 5.2.2 Vegetation Management 15 5.2.3 Water Management 15 5.2.4 Visual Resource Management 16 5.2.5 Wildlife Management 16 5.2.6 Fish Management 17 5.3 Cultural Resources 17 6.0 VISITOR SERVICES 6.1 Introduction 18 6.2 Visitor Opportunities/Facilities 19 6.2.1 Hiking/Backpacking 19 6.2.2 Angling 20 6.2.3 Mountain Biking 20 6.2.4 Winter Recreation 21 6.2.5 Recreational Services 21 6.2.6 Outdoor Education 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISITOR SERVICES (Continued) Page 6.2.7 Other Activities 22 6.3 Management Services 22 6.3.1 Headquarters and Service Yards 22 6.3.2 Site and Facility Design Standards
  • Mt. Tzouhalem Gutbuster Couver Island Race Results and Large Events Such As the Report—Sara Pape

    Mt. Tzouhalem Gutbuster Couver Island Race Results and Large Events Such As the Report—Sara Pape

    Twilight Shuffle—Christine Thate Harriers Mt.Christine Tzouhalem on GutBustertwo Half Report— SaraMarathon Pape & Claire Morgan CONTENTS On the Cover: Chris Callendar finishing 2012 B.A.A. Boston Marathon the 2013 Pioneer 8k, in Report - Martha McNeely a sprint Kate 1 Shawn Nelson President’s Message Susan Norrington Now a few words on motivation… As a recreational runner, running for fitness, rather than to prepare for competition, I sometimes find it’s not on the top of my list for activities for the day. I recently retired and thought it would be much easier for me to “hit the pavement/trails” more regularly than it had been when I was working full time and volunteering part time. And it is easier. And I do have more time, but occasionally I find I have to work on my moti- vation to just get out the door. I have a few tricks that I use to make the initial step out the door. Because I am injury prone, I cannot run every day, so I set the day and time for regular runs in my scheduler. I have my running gear laid out and ready to go the morning I am scheduled to run and I choose different places to run to keep it more interesting. I recently started running to manage some of my other commitments, e.g., taking my car in for servicing near Mayfair and then running home to Esquimalt and back again when it was ready for pick-up. Part of the enjoyment of this was planning the route home and a different route back.
  • The Kulleet Bay Mass Grave by Colleen Parsley a THESIS

    The Kulleet Bay Mass Grave by Colleen Parsley a THESIS

    The Kulleet Bay Mass Grave by Colleen Parsley A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Anthropology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2018 © Colleen Parsley, 2018 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, a thesis/dissertation entitled: The Kulleet Bay Mass Grave submitted by Colleen Parsley in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology Examining Committee: Darlene Weston Supervisor Bruce Granville Miller Supervisory Committee Member n/a Supervisory Committee Member David Pokotylo Additional Examiner Abstract This bioarchaeological study was undertaken in partnership with Stz’uminus First Nation and draws on forensic and osteological methodologies for the analysis of 153,386 cremated human bones found buried together in a mass grave. Archaeological context is integrated with the bioarchaeological results to understand the various dimensions of a mass cremation grave discovered during 2004 sewer line excavations in the traditional ancient Stz’uminus village of Kulleet Bay. Analyses of the thermally altered skeletal bone indicate fleshed bodies were intensely cremated with sustained temperatures. Vertical gradation of temperature altered matrices were observed in the stratigraphic profile. Archaeological and osteological evidence point to an in situ cremation event of fleshed corpses who suffered a mass death, radiocarbon dated to 2407 cal BP. Skeletal pathologies consistent with poor health and also potentially related to disease processes are perhaps indirect evidence of the agent of mass death. No evidence of conflict or natural environmental disaster is present to support alternative causes.
  • Musqueam Indian Band

    Musqueam Indian Band

    Consolidated Financial Statements of MUSQUEAM INDIAN BAND Year ended March 31, 2020 MUSQUEAM INDIAN BAND Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Year ended March 31, 2020 Page Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting 1 Independent Auditor’s Report 2-3 Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 4 Consolidated Statement of Operations 5 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets 6 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 8 - 33 Tel: 604 688 5421 BDO Canada LLP Fax: 604 688 5132 600 Cathedral Place [email protected] 925 West Georgia Street www.bdo.ca Vancouver BC V6C 3L2 Canada Independent Auditor’s Report To the Chief and Council of Musqueam Indian Band Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of the Musqueam Indian Band and its controlled entities (the “Consolidated Entity”) which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at March 31, 2020, and the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Changes in Net Financial Assets, and Cash Flows for the year then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Consolidated Entity as at March 31, 2020 and its results of operations, changes in net financial assets, and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards. Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of this report.
  • Cowichan River Chinook Salmon Incubation Assessment, 2005-2006

    Cowichan River Chinook Salmon Incubation Assessment, 2005-2006

    Cowichan River Chinook Salmon Incubation Assessment, 2005–2006 Prepared For Pacific Salmon Commission 600 - 1155 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6E 1B5 (604) 684-8081 July 14, 2006 By D.W. Burt1 and E. Ellis2 2 1 D. Burt and Associates Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Ltd. 2245 Ashlee Road 200 – 4185A Still Creek Drive Nanaimo, BC, V9R 6T5 Burnaby, BC, V5C 6G9 (250) 753-0027 (604) 294-2088 [email protected] [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This purpose of this study was to determine whether upstream sediment sources are adversely affecting egg-to-fry survival of Cowichan River chinook salmon. This information is necessary to determine whether remedial action to eliminate/diminish these sediment sources is warranted to assist in the recovery of Cowichan River chinook stocks. The specific objectives of the study were to: 1) monitor suspended sediment levels above and below known point sources at various flows during the 2005-2006 winter, 2) determine the level of fine sediment in selected spawning sites above and below the major sediment sources, 3) assess incubation survival by in situ trials and by hydraulic sampling at selected spawning sites above and below the major sediment sources, and 4) undertake a literature review on the effects of fine sediment on egg-to-fry survival. Suspended sediment levels were monitored by taking in situ turbidity measurements and by collecting water samples for lab analysis of total suspended solids (TSS). Substrate composition of spawning beds was assessed by collection of sediment samples at 1 site above the sediment sources (control) and 2 sites below the sediment sources (test sites).
  • Vancouver Island's Fly- Fishing Heritage

    Vancouver Island's Fly- Fishing Heritage

    VVVaaannncccooouuuvvveeerrr IIIssslllaaannnddd’’’sss FFFlllyyy--- FFFiiissshhhiiinnnggg HHHeeerrriiitttaaagggeee By Art Lingren Published in 1865, MacFie’s book is one of May 2004 the earliest published on the two colonies Vancouver Island’s fly fishing heritage is entwined with that of the Hudson Bay Company (HBC). Founded in 1670, the HBC was given exclusive rights to trade in Northern North America. Over the next century and a half, the Company expanded from its Hudson Bay beginnings, pushing west to the Pacific Ocean and including the coast from what is now British Columbia as far south as Northern California. However, in 1843, as a result of a dispute with the Americans, the HBC moved its main southwestern headquarters from Fort Vancouver on the Columbia River to Fort Victoria on Vancouver Island. In 1849 Vancouver Island became a colony of Great Britain and remained a separate colony until joined with British Columbia, on the mainland, to form one colony in 1866. Vancouver Island is The territory was probably the only evidently not considered colony in the British worth fighting for Empire that has its simply because the origins based on fly Pacific salmon would fishing. In the mid- not take the fly! That 1800s, it was commonly story--a favourite along believed that Pacific the Pacific Coast-- salmon would not take circulated for many the fly. Indeed, it was years. Clearly, Captain also rumoured that Gordon was not England's Foreign impressed with the Secretary in the 1840s, country he saw or with Lord Aberdeen (on the the methods used for advice of his brother-in- catching Pacific salmon.