DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX D Forest Service Species Lists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX D Forest Service Species Lists APPENDIX D Forest Service Species Lists USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region Sensitive Animal Species by Forest Mar-13 Scientific Name Common Name Shasta-Trinity BIRDS (12) Accipiter gentilis Northern goshawk X Coturnicops noveboracensis Yellow rail X Empidonax traillii Willow flycatcher X Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle X MAMMALS (13) Antrozous pallidus Pallid bat X Corynorhinus townsendii Townsend's big-eared bat X Gulo gulo luteus California wolverine X Martes caurina American marten X Martes pennanti pacifica Pacific fisher X Myotis thysanodes Fringe-tailed myotis X AMPHIBIANS (22) Hydromantes shastae Shasta salamander X Rana aurora aurora Northern red-legged frog X Rana boylii Foothill yellow-legged frog X Rana cascadae Cascade frog X Rhyacotriton variegatus Southern torrent salamander X REPTILES (12) Actinemys marmorata Western pond turtle X INVERTEBRATES, TERRESTRIAL (24) Bombus occidentalis western bumble bee X Monadenia troglodytes troglodytes Shasta sideband snail X Monadenia troglodytes wintu Wintu sideband snail X Trilobopsis roperi Shasta chaparral snail X Trilobopsis tehamana Tehama chaparral snail X Vespericola pressleyi Big Bar hesperian snail X Vespericola shasta Shasta hesperian snail X AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES - springsnails, mussels, limpets (17) Anodonta californiensis California floater (freshwater mussel) X Fluminicola seminalis nugget pebblesnail X Juga nigrina black juga (snail) X Juga (Calibasis) occata scalloped juga (snail) X Lanx patelloides kneecap lanx (limpet) X Pisidium (Cyclocalyx) ultramontanum montane peaclam X FISHES (23) Entosphenus tridentatus Pacific lamprey X Mylopharodon conocephalus Hardhead X Oncorhynchus mykiss Steelhead - Klamath Mtn. Prov. ESU X Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 7 McCloud River redband trout X Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Upper Klamath-Trinty chinook ESU X R5 Total Sensitive Animals = 124 Total # Sensitive Animals per Forest 34 S-T Page 1 of 1 AEF I L N 1 LIST OF SURVEY AND MANAGE SPECIES, NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN AREA 2 JANUARY 2001 Record of Decision LIST 3 Common Name (common names provided for animals and Name and Geographic Area on January 2001 ROD List vascular plants only) Alternative Names/ Synonyms 4 Kingdom NRCS Plants Code/GeoBOB species code column (for K) January 2001 ROD Category 5 F ACFA2 B ACANTHOPHYSIUM FARLOWII FUNGUS syn. Aleurodiscus farlowii in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 6 F ALAV B ALBATRELLUS AVELLANEUS FUNGUS 7 F ALCA20 B ALBATRELLUS CAERULEOPORUS FUNGUS 8 F ALEL4 B ALBATRELLUS ELLISII FUNGUS 9 F ALFL6 B ALBATRELLUS FLETTII FUNGUS 10 F ALAL15 B ALPOVA ALEXSMITHII FUNGUS 11 F ALOL3 B ALPOVA OLIVACEOTINCTUS FUNGUS Arcangeliella sp. nov. #Trappe 12359, 12382 in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; syn. Elasmomyces 12 F ARCA46 B ARCANGELIELLA CAMPHORATA FUNGUS camphoratus 13 F ARCR10 B ARCANGELIELLA CRASSA FUNGUS 14 F ARLA29 B ARCANGELIELLA LACTARIOIDES FUNGUS 15 F ASLY3 B ASTEROPHORA LYCOPERDOIDES FUNGUS 16 F ASPA42 B ASTEROPHORA PARASITICA FUNGUS 17 F BAMY3 B BAEOSPORA MYRIADOPHYLLA FUNGUS Balsamia nigra in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; Balsamia nigrescens in ORNHIC Rare, T&E Species of 18 F BANI6 B BALSAMIA NIGRENS FUNGUS Oregon, March 2007 19 F BOHA2 B BOLETUS HAEMATINUS FUNGUS 20 F BOPU4 B BOLETUS PULCHERRIMUS FUNGUS syn. Bondarzewia montana (BOMO3, GeoBOB 21 F BOME4 B BONDARZEWIA MESENTERICA FUNGUS species CN 603) syn. Oxyporus nobilissimus in Table C-3 1994 22 F BRNO8 A BRIDGEOPORUS NOBILISSIMUS FUNGUS S&Gs 23 F CASU63 D CANTHARELLUS SUBALBIDUS FUNGUS 24 F CAVE23 B CATATHELASMA VENTRICOSA FUNGUS 25 F CHPI11 D CHALCIPORUS PIPERATUS FUNGUS syn. Boletus piperatus in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs Chamonixia pacifica sp. nov. #Trappe 12768 in 26 F CHCA36 B CHAMONIXIA CAESPITOSA FUNGUS Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 27 F CHAL23 B CHOIROMYCES ALVEOLATUS FUNGUS 28 F CHVE12 B CHOIROMYCES VENOSUS FUNGUS 29 F CHCY4 B CHROMOSERA CYANOPHYLLA FUNGUS Mycena lilacifolia in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 30 F CHLO2 B CHROOGOMPHUS LOCULATUS FUNGUS 31 F CHGR23 B CHRYSOMPHALINA GROSSULA FUNGUS 32 F CLLI7 B CLAVARIADELPHUS LIGULA FUNGUS Clavariadelphus pistillaris, but species incorrectly 33 F CLOC4 B CLAVARIADELPHUS OCCIDENTALIS FUNGUS spelled "pistilaris" in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 34 F CLSA9 B CLAVARIADELPHUS SACHALINENSIS FUNGUS 35 F CLSU20 B CLAVARIADELPHUS SUBFASTIGIATUS FUNGUS 36 F CLTR4 B CLAVARIADELPHUS TRUNCATUS FUNGUS syn. Clavariadelphus borealis Clavulina ornatipes in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; C. castanopes var. lignicola was a spelling error on 38 F CLCAL3 B CLAVULINA CASTANOPES V. LIGNICOLA FUNGUS the species name 39 F CLSE4 B CLITOCYBE SENILIS FUNGUS 40 F CLSU18 B CLITOCYBE SUBDITOPODA FUNGUS 41 F COBA11 B COLLYBIA BAKERENSIS FUNGUS 42 F CORA16 B COLLYBIA RACEMOSA FUNGUS 43 F COCA43 B CORDYCEPS CAPITATA FUNGUS 44 F COOP3 B CORDYCEPS OPHIOGLOSSOIDES FUNGUS 45 F COBA12 B CORTINARIUS BARLOWENSIS FUNGUS syn. Cortinarius azureus 46 F COBO7 B CORTINARIUS BOULDERENSIS FUNGUS 47 F COCY8 B CORTINARIUS CYANITES FUNGUS Page 1 of 9 AEF I L N Common Name (common names provided for animals and Name and Geographic Area on January 2001 ROD List vascular plants only) Alternative Names/ Synonyms 4 Kingdom NRCS Plants Code/GeoBOB species code column (for K) January 2001 ROD Category syn. Cortinarius spilomeus var. depauperatus; 48 F CODE12 B CORTINARIUS DEPAUPERATUS FUNGUS Cortinarius spilomius in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 49 F COMA22 B CORTINARIUS MAGNIVELATUS FUNGUS 50 F COOL4 B CORTINARIUS OLYMPIANUS FUNGUS Cortinarius rainierensis in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; 2003 Fungi Handbook states C. rainierensis is the preferred name but Index Fungorum did not 51 F COSP11 B CORTINARIUS SPECIOSISSIMUS FUNGUS confirm these as synonyms 2003 Fungi Handbook states this does not occur in North America; Index Fungorum could not 52 F COTA B CORTINARIUS TABULARIS FUNGUS confirm or negate 53 F COUM3 B CORTINARIUS UMIDICOLA FUNGUS Cortinarius canabarba in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 54 F COVA8 B CORTINARIUS VALGUS FUNGUS 55 F COVA7 B CORTINARIUS VARIIPES FUNGUS 56 F COVE12 B CORTINARIUS VERRUCISPORUS FUNGUS 57 F COWI3 B CORTINARIUS WIEBEAE FUNGUS syn. Cantharellus tubaeformis in Table C-3 1994 58 F CRTU3 D CRATERELLUS TUBAEFORMIS FUNGUS S&Gs 59 F CUMO2 B CUDONIA MONTICOLA FUNGUS 60 F CYLA13 B CYPHELLOSTEREUM LAEVE FUNGUS 61 F DEHU4 B DERMOCYBE HUMBOLDTENSIS FUNGUS 62 F DEFU2 B DESTUNTZIA FUSCA FUNGUS 63 F DERU7 B DESTUNTZIA RUBRA FUNGUS Dichostereum granulosum in Table C-3 1994 64 F DIBO4 B DICHOSTEREUM BOREALE FUNGUS S&Gs 65 F ELAN4 B ELAPHOMYCES ANTHRACINUS FUNGUS 66 F ELSU4 B ELAPHOMYCES SUBVISCIDUS FUNGUS 67 F ENAC3 B ENDOGONE ACROGENA FUNGUS 68 F ENOR2 B ENDOGONE OREGONENSIS FUNGUS Rhodocybe nitida in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; syn. 69 F ENNI B ENTOLOMA NITIDUM FUNGUS Rhodophyllus nitidus 70 F FABI B FAYODIA BISPHAERIGERA FUNGUS syn. Fayodia gracilipes in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs Alpova sp. nov. # Trappe 1966 in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs; Alpova aurantiaca noted as synonym in Table 1-1, January 2001 ROD S&M list (but 71 F FEAU4 B FEVANSIA AURANTIACA FUNGUS cannot confirm this) 72 F GAAT2 B GALERINA ATKINSONIANA FUNGUS 73 F GACE B GALERINA CERINA FUNGUS 74 F GAHE10 E GALERINA HETEROCYSTIS FUNGUS 75 F GASP13 E GALERINA SPHAGNICOLA FUNGUS 76 F GAVI8 B GALERINA VITTAEFORMIS FUNGUS 77 F GAIM B GASTROBOLETUS IMBELLUS FUNGUS 78 F GARU2 B GASTROBOLETUS RUBER FUNGUS 79 F GASU6 B GASTROBOLETUS SUBALPINUS FUNGUS 80 F GATU B GASTROBOLETUS TURBINATUS FUNGUS Gastroboletus sp. nov. #Trappe 2897, 7515 in 81 F GAVI7 B GASTROBOLETUS VIVIDUS FUNGUS Table C-3 1994 S&Gs Gastrosuillus sp. nov. #Trappe 9608 in Table C-3 82 F GAAM4 E GASTROSUILLUS AMARANTHII FUNGUS 1994 S&Gs Gastroboletus sp. nov. #Trappe 7516 in Table C-3 83 F GAUM B GASTROSUILLUS UMBRINUS FUNGUS 1994 S&Gs 84 F GAMA11 B GAUTIERIA MAGNICELLARIS FUNGUS 85 F GAOT B GAUTIERIA OTTHII FUNGUS 86 F GEFL5 B GELATINODISCUS FLAVIDUS FUNGUS 87 F GLRA3 B GLOMUS RADIATUS FUNGUS Page 2 of 9 AEF I L N Common Name (common names provided for animals and Name and Geographic Area on January 2001 ROD List vascular plants only) Alternative Names/ Synonyms 4 Kingdom NRCS Plants Code/GeoBOB species code column (for K) January 2001 ROD Category 88 F GOBO2 B GOMPHUS BONARII FUNGUS 89 F GOCL B GOMPHUS CLAVATUS FUNGUS syn. Gomphus floccosus and CURRENT NAME 90 F TRFLX1 F GOMPHUS FLOCCOSUS (GOFL), In California FUNGUS according to Index Fungorum 91 F GOKA B GOMPHUS KAUFFMANII FUNGUS Gymnomyces sp. nov. #Trappe 1690, 1706, 1710, 4703, 5576, 5052, 7545 and Martellia sp. nov. 92 F GYAB B GYMNOMYCES ABIETIS FUNGUS #Trappe 311, 1700, 5903 in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs Martellia sp. nov. #Trappe 649 in Table C-3 1994 93 F GYNO B GYMNOMYCES NONDISTINCTA FUNGUS S&Gs 94 F GYPU2 B GYMNOPILUS PUNCTIFOLIUS FUNGUS 95 F GYCA4 B GYROMITRA CALIFORNICA FUNGUS 96 F GYES F GYROMITRA ESCULENTA FUNGUS 97 F GYIN4 B GYROMITRA INFULA FUNGUS 98 F GYME B GYROMITRA MELALEUCOIDES FUNGUS Gyromitra gigas (GYGI, GeoBOB species CN 99 F GYMO F GYROMITRA MONTANA FUNGUS 34218) noted as synonym in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 100 F HEOL3 B HEBELOMA OLYMPIANUM FUNGUS Hebeloma olympiana in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 101 F HECR13 B HELVELLA CRASSITUNICATA FUNGUS 102 F HEEL6 B HELVELLA ELASTICA FUNGUS 103 F HEMA19 B HELVELLA MACULATA FUNGUS Hydontrya sp. nov. #Trappe 787, 792 in Table C-3 104 F HYIN8 B HYDNOTRYA INORDINATA FUNGUS 1994 S&Gs Hydnotrya subnix sp. nov. #Trappe 1861 in Table 105 F HYSU9 B HYDNOTRYA SUBNIX FUNGUS C-3 1994 S&Gs 106 F HYUM4 B HYDNUM UMBILICATUM FUNGUS 107 F HYMA8 B HYDROPUS MARGINELLUS FUNGUS Mycena marginella in Table C-3 1994 S&Gs 108 F HYCA21 B HYGROPHORUS CAERULEUS FUNGUS Hygrophorus saxatilis noted as preferred name in 109 F HYKA2 B HYGROPHORUS KARSTENII FUNGUS 2003 Fungi Handbook 110 F HYVE9 B
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13
    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Prints
    SPORE PRINTS BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 473 June 2011 OLDEST, ODDEST FUNGI FINALLY “The big message here is that most fungi and most fungal diversity PHOTOGRAPHED Susan Milius reside in fungi that have neither been collected nor cultivated,” Science News, May 12, 2011 says John W. Taylor of the University of California, Berkeley. Exeter team member Meredith Jones spotted the hard-to-detect organisms by marking them with fluorescent tags. The trick re- vealed fungal cells attached to algal cells as if parasitizing them. M. Jones One of the big questions about early fungi is whether they might have arisen from “some kind of parasitic ancestor like Rozella,” says Rytas Vilgalys of Duke University. Interesting, yes. But loosening the definition of fungi to include organisms without chitin walls could wreak havoc in the concept of that group, objects Robert Lücking of the Field Museum in Chicago. “I would actually conclude, based on the evidence, that these are not fungi,” he says. Instead, they might be near rela- tives—an almost-fungus. Two fungal cells, possibly from an ancient lineage, each show a curvy, taillike flagellum (red) during a mobile stage in their life cycle. IS MUTATED FUNGUS KILLING AMERICAN BATS? Andy Coghlan Images of little dots, some wriggling a skinny tail, give scientists New Scientist, May 24, 2011 a first glimpse of a vast swath of the oldest, and perhaps oddest, fungal group alive today. A fungus blamed for killing more than a mil- The first views suggest that, unlike any other fungi known, these lion bats in the US since 2006 has been found might live as essentially naked cells without the rigid cell wall to differ only slightly from an apparently that supposedly defines a fungus, says Tom Richards of the Natu- harmless European version.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi of North East Victoria Online
    Agarics Agarics Agarics Agarics Fungi of North East Victoria An Identication and Conservation Guide North East Victoria encompasses an area of almost 20,000 km2, bounded by the Murray River to the north and east, the Great Dividing Range to the south and Fungi the Warby Ranges to the west. From box ironbark woodlands and heathy dry forests, open plains and wetlands, alpine herb elds, montane grasslands and of North East Victoria tall ash forests, to your local park or backyard, fungi are found throughout the region. Every fungus species contributes to the functioning, health and An Identification and Conservation Guide resilience of these ecosystems. Identifying Fungi This guide represents 96 species from hundreds, possibly thousands that grow in the diverse habitats of North East Victoria. It includes some of the more conspicuous and distinctive species that can be recognised in the eld, using features visible to the Agaricus xanthodermus* Armillaria luteobubalina* Coprinellus disseminatus Cortinarius austroalbidus Cortinarius sublargus Galerina patagonica gp* Hypholoma fasciculare Lepista nuda* Mycena albidofusca Mycena nargan* Protostropharia semiglobata Russula clelandii gp. yellow stainer Australian honey fungus fairy bonnet Australian white webcap funeral bell sulphur tuft blewit* white-crowned mycena Nargan’s bonnet dung roundhead naked eye or with a x10 magnier. LAMELLAE M LAMELLAE M ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S, P ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE M ■ ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ When identifying a fungus, try and nd specimens of the same species at dierent growth stages, so you can observe the developmental changes that can occur. Also note the variation in colour and shape that can result from exposure to varying weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycosphere Notes 225–274: Types and Other Specimens of Some Genera of Ascomycota
    Mycosphere 9(4): 647–754 (2018) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/3 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Mycosphere Notes 225–274: types and other specimens of some genera of Ascomycota Doilom M1,2,3, Hyde KD2,3,6, Phookamsak R1,2,3, Dai DQ4,, Tang LZ4,14, Hongsanan S5, Chomnunti P6, Boonmee S6, Dayarathne MC6, Li WJ6, Thambugala KM6, Perera RH 6, Daranagama DA6,13, Norphanphoun C6, Konta S6, Dong W6,7, Ertz D8,9, Phillips AJL10, McKenzie EHC11, Vinit K6,7, Ariyawansa HA12, Jones EBG7, Mortimer PE2, Xu JC2,3, Promputtha I1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China 3 World Agro Forestry Centre, East and Central Asia, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China 4 Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China 5 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China 6 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 7 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 8 Department Research (BT), Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, BE-1860 Meise, Belgium 9 Direction Générale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Rue A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruiting Body Form, Not Nutritional Mode, Is the Major Driver of Diversification in Mushroom-Forming Fungi
    Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi Marisol Sánchez-Garcíaa,b, Martin Rybergc, Faheema Kalsoom Khanc, Torda Vargad, László G. Nagyd, and David S. Hibbetta,1 aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610; bUppsala Biocentre, Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75005 Uppsala, Sweden; cDepartment of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; and dSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved October 16, 2020 (received for review December 22, 2019) With ∼36,000 described species, Agaricomycetes are among the and the evolution of enclosed spore-bearing structures. It has most successful groups of Fungi. Agaricomycetes display great di- been hypothesized that the loss of ballistospory is irreversible versity in fruiting body forms and nutritional modes. Most have because it involves a complex suite of anatomical features gen- pileate-stipitate fruiting bodies (with a cap and stalk), but the erating a “surface tension catapult” (8, 11). The effect of gas- group also contains crust-like resupinate fungi, polypores, coral teroid fruiting body forms on diversification rates has been fungi, and gasteroid forms (e.g., puffballs and stinkhorns). Some assessed in Sclerodermatineae, Boletales, Phallomycetidae, and Agaricomycetes enter into ectomycorrhizal symbioses with plants, Lycoperdaceae, where it was found that lineages with this type of while others are decayers (saprotrophs) or pathogens. We constructed morphology have diversified at higher rates than nongasteroid a megaphylogeny of 8,400 species and used it to test the following lineages (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens of Alaska's South Coast
    United States Department of Agriculture Lichens of Alaska’s South Coast Forest Service R10-RG-190 Alaska Region Reprint April 2014 WHAT IS A LICHEN? Lichens are specialized fungi that “farm” algae as a food source. Unlike molds, mildews, and mushrooms that parasitize or scavenge food from other organisms, the fungus of a lichen cultivates tiny algae and / or blue-green bacteria (called cyanobacteria) within the fabric of interwoven fungal threads that form the body of the lichen (or thallus). The algae and cyanobacteria produce food for themselves and for the fungus by converting carbon dioxide and water into sugars using the sun’s energy (photosynthesis). Thus, a lichen is a combination of two or sometimes three organisms living together. Perhaps the most important contribution of the fungus is to provide a protective habitat for the algae or cyanobacteria. The green or blue-green photosynthetic layer is often visible between two white fungal layers if a piece of lichen thallus is torn off. Most lichen-forming fungi cannot exist without the photosynthetic partner because they have become dependent on them for survival. But in all cases, a fungus looks quite different in the lichenized form compared to its free-living form. HOW DO LICHENS REPRODUCE? Lichens sexually reproduce with fruiting bodies of various shapes and colors that can often look like miniature mushrooms. These are called apothecia (Fig. 1) and contain spores that germinate and Figure 1. Apothecia, fruiting grow into the fungus. Each bodies fungus must find the right photosynthetic partner in order to become a lichen. Lichens reproduce asexually in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhizopogon Togasawariana Sp. Nov., the First Report of Rhizopogon Associated with an Asian Species of Pseudotsuga
    Rhizopogon togasawariana sp. nov., the first report of Rhizopogon associated with an Asian species of Pseudotsuga Mujic, A. B., Hosaka, K., & Spatafora, J. W. (2014). Rhizopogon togasawariana sp. nov., the first report of Rhizopogon associated with an Asian species of Pseudotsuga. Mycologia, 106(1), 105-112. doi:10.3852/13-055 10.3852/13-055 Allen Press Inc. Version of Record http://hdl.handle.net/1957/47245 http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Mycologia, 106(1), 2014, pp. 105–112. DOI: 10.3852/13-055 # 2014 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Rhizopogon togasawariana sp. nov., the first report of Rhizopogon associated with an Asian species of Pseudotsuga Alija B. Mujic1 the natural and anthropogenic range of the family Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon and plays an important ecological role in the State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2902 establishment and maintenance of forests (Tweig et Kentaro Hosaka al. 2007, Simard 2009). The foundational species Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature concepts for genus Rhizopogon were established in the and Science, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan North American monograph of Smith and Zeller (1966), and a detailed monograph also has been Joseph W. Spatafora produced for European Rhizopogon species (Martı´n Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon 1996). However, few data on Asian species of State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2902 Rhizopogon have been incorporated into phylogenetic and taxonomic studies and only a limited account of Asian Rhizopogon species has been published for EM Abstract: Rhizopogon subgenus Villosuli are the only associates of Pinus (Hosford and Trappe 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Bryoria Section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, Based on Chemical, Morphological and Molecular Data
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 51: 345–371 ISSN 0003-3847 (print) ISSN 1797-2442 (online) Helsinki 22 September 2014 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2014 Taxonomy of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, based on chemical, morphological and molecular data Saara Velmala1,*, Leena Myllys1, Trevor Goward2, Håkon Holien3 & Pekka Halonen4 1) Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (*corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]) 2) UBC Herbarium, Beaty Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (mailing address: Enlichened Consulting Ltd., 5369 Clearwater Valley Road, Upper Clearwater, BC V0E 1N1, Canada) 3) Nord-Trøndelag University College, Serviceboks 2501, N-7729 Steinkjer, Norway 4) Botanical Museum, Department of Biology, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland Received 31 Jan. 2014, final version received 13 June 2014, accepted 18 June 2014 Velmala, S., Myllys, L., Goward, T., Holien, H. & Halonen, P. 2014: Taxonomy of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanoromycetes) in North America and Europe, based on chemical, morphological and molecular data. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 51: 345–371. Ninety-seven ingroup specimens of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Leca- noromycetes) were studied using molecular, chemical, morphological and geographic characters. The molecular data included nuclear ribosomal markers (ITS, IGS) and the partial glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. In addition to par- simony analyses, a haplotype network was constructed. Phylogenetic analyses strongly supported the monophyly of the section Implexae. The specimens were grouped into two monophyletic clades. Clade 1 encompassed all esorediate material from North America, whereas Clade 2 included both sorediate North American material and all European material.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
    [Show full text]