DOCSLIB.ORG

PLANNING PANEL AGENDA Schedule of Applications A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLANNING PANEL AGENDA Schedule of Applications A PLANNING PANEL AGENDA Schedule of Applications a) Application 4/17/2214/0O1 – Land to the North of Cross Grove, Cleator Outline application for the erection of 7 dwellings b) Application 4/17/2252/0O1 – Land at Bowthorn Farm, Bowthorn Road, Cleator Moor Outline application with all matters reserved for residential development c) Application 4/17/2256/0F1 – Sellafield Site, Seascale Application for new steam generation plant and demolition of CHP Plant d) Application 4/17/2271/0F1 – Winning Post (Betting Shop), Meadow Road, Mirehouse, Whitehaven Application for change of use to community gymnasium e) Application 4/17/9007/0F2 – Pow Beck Valley and area from Marchon to St Bees coast County Council application for development of an existing surface mine entrance for a new underground metallurgical coal mine and associated surface development including coal storage and processing buildings, access road, security fencing, lighting, outfall to sea, surface water management system, interconnecting underground coal conveyor to a new loading and railway siding to the Cumbria coastal railway line, with adjoining office/welfare facilities, extension of railway under pass, security fencing, lighting, landscaping, construction of a temporary development compound and associated permanent service access off Mirehouse road, Pow Beck valley south of Whitehven Application Number: 4/17/2214/0O1 Application Type: Full – C.B.C. Applicant: Mr R. Mulholland Application Address: LAND TO NORTH OF CROSS GROVE, CLEATOR Proposal: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR THE ERECTION OF 7 DWELLINGS Parish: Cleator Moor Recommendation Summary: Approve in Outline Introduction This application relates to an area of land comprising 0.5 hectares which lies to the north of a small residential estate called Cross Grove on the northern edge of Cleator. The land bounds the cemetery associated with the adjoining St Marys Church. Its northern boundary is lined with mature trees. This application was deferred at the last meeting to enable Members to visit the site. The site visit took place on 13th September 2017. Proposal This application seeks outline planning permission for the redevelopment of the site to provide 7 dwellings. The application seeks to establish the principle of development and all matters relating to layout, scale, appearance and landscaping are to be reserved for future approval. The application does include full details of the access into the site which is to be achieved off Flosh Meadows using an existing gated entrance. This entrance would also serve the land to the west which has an existing planning permission for 21 self-build residential plots. Although only in outline form the applicant has submitted an indicative layout plan which illustrates how seven dwellings could be accommodated on the site. These are shown in a linear arrangement and would be served from a spine road that runs in a north-south direction on the western edge of the land. Individual driveways would be provided off this spine road to serve each plot. This linear arrangement will ensure that elongated gardens can be provided to ensure a generous separation distance with the adjoining cemetery. The Design and Access Statement that accompanies the application sets out that it is anticipated that the dwelling would comprise a mix of single, one and a half, and two storey properties. The applicant has also provided details to show how additional landscaping could be provided to soften the impact of the development within the local area. Consultee Responses Town Council Members noted the close proximity to the cemetery and asked that planning conditions be placed on any approvals to ensure that future residents take a sensitive approach (with regards to noise and parties) when services and events are occurring in the Church Grotto. Highways Authority Following the submission of additional details I am satisfied that adequate access and visibility arrangements can be achieved to serve this development. On this basis I have no objections. Planning Policy Team As the site lies outside of the Cleator settlement boundary the proposal is considered contrary to policy ST2 (Spatial Development Strategy) of the Copeland Local Plan which states that development outside the defined settlement boundaries should have a proven requirement for such a location, which this proposal does not demonstrate. Where the proposal does not conform with the Copeland Local Plan 2013-2028 the Interim Housing Policy comes into effect. As a small site on the edge of a Local Centre that is directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary and built form of the village the proposal complies with criteria A and B of the Interim Housing Policy. Cleator is considered to be a sustainable location which should provide access via a range of transport modes which meet criteria C and E of the Interim Housing Policy. Although the site lies within a proposed ‘green gap’ option (outlined within the Site Allocations and Policies Plan Preferred Options January 2015) which seeks to prevent any merging of Cleator and Cleator Moor settlements, the ‘green gap’ proposal currently has very limited status in planning terms. Regardless of this matter, it is considered that development of this site in itself would not result in isolated development or the merging of the two settlements. The extent of the landscaping proposed meets the requirements of Policy DM26 and also helps to lessen the potential of urban sprawl and the merging of Cleator and Cleator Moor settlements. The site lies close to existing services and facilities in Cleator and Cleator Moor and is well screened with existing and proposed vegetation. On balance and by undertaking a site visit, the Strategic Planning team supports the principle of housing development at this site. However, the team are keen to see further detail coming forward at reserved matters stage which would include proposals for housing type and tenure, particularly as the density per hectare is considerably lower than would be expected of this site. Other 2 letters of objection have been received to the application. One local resident raises the follow points:- - Contrary to the Policies within the adopted Local Plan - Greenfield development - Questions the need for housing particularly as permission has been granted for the other residential development within Cleator, namely the former Kangol site - The applicant has a current permission for 21 plots which has not been commenced - Excessive density - Adverse impact on residential amenity - Out of keeping with the existing street pattern and would be detrimental to the character of the local area - Increased traffic at the junction between Flosh Meadows and the A5086 - The cemetery grounds and grotto are a community asset open to everyone who come to enjoy the peace, tranquillity and beauty of the surroundings. The Parish Priest has also set out his concerns. He stresses that the Grotto grounds enjoy both local and national recognition. He is concerned and remains unpersuaded that despite the proposed safeguards outlined in the proposals this further development will have a deleterious effect on the unique attraction and ethos of the Grotto grounds and its many visitors. He also outlines that he remains to be persuaded that the need for the executive self-build properties in this location envisaged in the application exist. If it does then he questions why this cannot be accommodated within the existing approval which was granted two years ago on the adjoining land. Planning Policy National Planning Policy The National Planning Policy Frameworks (NPPF) sets out the planning guidelines at a national level and outlines that the purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development. It stresses that in assessing and determining development proposals Local Planning Authorities should apply the presumption in favour of sustainable development. Paragraph 7 of the NPPF establishes the three dimensions to sustainable development, these can be summarised as follows:- Planning for prosperity (an economic role) – contributing to building a strong, responsive and competitive economy, by ensuring that sufficient land of the right type is available in the right places and at the right time to support growth and innovation; and by identifying and coordinating development requirements, including the provision of infrastructure; Planning for people (a social role) – supporting strong, vibrant and healthy communities, by providing the supply of housing required to meet the needs of present and future generations; and by creating a high quality built environment, with accessible local services that reflect the community’s needs and support its health, social and cultural well-being; and Planning for places (an environmental role) – contributing to protecting and enhancing the natural, built and historic environment; and, as part of this, helping to improve biodiversity, use natural resources prudently, minimise waste and pollution, and mitigate and adapt to climate change including moving to a low carbon economy. Paragraph 8 stresses that these roles should not be undertaken in isolation, because they are mutually dependent. Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development The overarching aim of the NPPF is to proactively deliver sustainable development to support the Government’s economic growth objectives and deliver the country’s development needs. Delivering a wide choice of high quality homes A key objective of the NPPF
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inspector's Report
    Inspector’s Report CUMBRIA COUNTY COUNCIL APPEAL by UNITED KINGDOM NIREX LIMITED Inspector: C S McDonald MA DMA LMRTPI Solicitor Asst. Inspector: C Jarvis LLB Solicitor Assessor: C V Knipe BSc CEng CGeol MIMinE MIMM FGS Dates of Inquiry: 5 September 1995 to 1 February 1996 File: APP1H09001M9412470 19 CONTENTS Section Chapter 1 Introduction Abbreviations & Acronyms Technical Glossary Preamble to Report 1 2 Background A. Legal, Political & Regulatory Framework 6 B. Site & Proposals 10 C. Development Plan 15 3 Legal Interpretations A. Nature of Project & Relevance of Repository 25 B. Alternatives & Availability of Information 31 C. Marine Discharges 42 4 Conformity with Development Plan A. Statutory Development Plan 47 B. Retained & Emerging Policies 59 5 Environmental Effects A. Visual Impact 65 B. Soci~Economic Impact 84 C. Traffic Impact 106 D. Noise & Vibration Effects 116 E. Other Effects 123 6 Scientific & Technical Benefits A. Basic Repository Icocational Criteria 130 B. Site Selection Process 147 C. Science & Technical Programmes 170 D. Model Development 212 E. Radiological Protection & Safety Assessment 229 F. Role of RCF & Promise of PRZ 246 7 Conditions A. Mitigation of Environmental Effects 259 B. Ensuring Scientific & Technical Benefits 262 8 Final Conclusions 265 9 Recommendation 278 Appendices 1. Assessor's Report 2. Appearances 3. Documents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Parties [and see the document codes at the start of the Documents List] Construction Workers = Cumbria Construction Workers Copeland - Copeland Borough Cooncil,
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Industrial and Modern Resource
    Chapter 7: Industrial Period Resource Assessment Chapter 7 The Industrial and Modern Period Resource Assessment by Robina McNeil and Richard Newman With contributions by Mark Brennand, Eleanor Casella, Bernard Champness, CBA North West Industrial Archaeology Panel, David Cranstone, Peter Davey, Chris Dunn, Andrew Fielding, David George, Elizabeth Huckerby, Christine Longworth, Ian Miller, Mike Morris, Michael Nevell, Caron Newman, North West Medieval Pottery Research Group, Sue Stallibrass, Ruth Hurst Vose, Kevin Wilde, Ian Whyte and Sarah Woodcock. Introduction Implicit in any archaeological study of this period is the need to balance the archaeological investigation The cultural developments of the 16th and 17th centu- of material culture with many other disciplines that ries laid the foundations for the radical changes to bear on our understanding of the recent past. The society and the environment that commenced in the wealth of archive and documentary sources available 18th century. The world’s first Industrial Revolution for constructing historical narratives in the Post- produced unprecedented social and environmental Medieval period offer rich opportunities for cross- change and North West England was at the epicentre disciplinary working. At the same time historical ar- of the resultant transformation. Foremost amongst chaeology is increasingly in the foreground of new these changes was a radical development of the com- theoretical approaches (Nevell 2006) that bring to- munications infrastructure, including wholly new gether economic and sociological analysis, anthropol- forms of transportation (Fig 7.1), the growth of exist- ogy and geography. ing manufacturing and trading towns and the crea- tion of new ones. The period saw the emergence of Environment Liverpool as an international port and trading me- tropolis, while Manchester grew as a powerhouse for The 18th to 20th centuries witnessed widespread innovation in production, manufacture and transpor- changes within the landscape of the North West, and tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter-7-Industrial-And-Modern
    Chapter 7: Industrial Period Resource Assessment Chapter 7 The Industrial and Modern Period Resource Assessment by Robina McNeil and Richard Newman With contributions by Mark Brennand, Eleanor Casella, Bernard Champness, CBA North West Industrial Archaeology Panel, David Cranstone, Peter Davey, Chris Dunn, Andrew Fielding, David George, Elizabeth Huckerby, Christine Longworth, Ian Miller, Mike Morris, Michael Nevell, Caron Newman, North West Medieval Pottery Research Group, Sue Stallibrass, Ruth Hurst Vose, Kevin Wilde, Ian Whyte and Sarah Woodcock. Introduction Implicit in any archaeological study of this period is the need to balance the archaeological investigation The cultural developments of the 16 th and 17 th centu- of material culture with many other disciplines that ries laid the foundations for the radical changes to bear on our understanding of the recent past. The society and the environment that commenced in the wealth of archive and documentary sources available 18 th century. The world’s first Industrial Revolution for constructing historical narratives in the Post- produced unprecedented social and environmental Medieval period offer rich opportunities for cross- change and North West England was at the epicentre disciplinary working. At the same time historical ar- of the resultant transformation. Foremost amongst chaeology is increasingly in the foreground of new these changes was a radical development of the com- theoretical approaches (Nevell 2006) that bring to- munications infrastructure, including wholly new gether economic and sociological analysis, anthropol- forms of transportation (Fig 7.1), the growth of exist- ogy and geography. ing manufacturing and trading towns and the crea- tion of new ones. The period saw the emergence of Environment Liverpool as an international port and trading me- tropolis, while Manchester grew as a powerhouse for The 18 th to 20 th centuries witnessed widespread innovation in production, manufacture and transpor- changes within the landscape of the North West, and tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Bridge
    THIS REPORT IS EMBARGOED UNTIL 4PM MONDAY 28TH MARCH 2011 OPERATION BRIDGE PEER REVIEW INTO THE RESPONSE OF CUMBRIA CONSTABULARY FOLLOWING THE ACTIONS OF DERRICK BIRD ON 2nd JUNE 2010. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW – FINAL REPORT MARCH 2011 ASSISTANT CHIEF CONSTABLE SIMON CHESTERMAN WEST MERCIA POLICE ACPO LEAD – ARMED POLICING WORKING GROUP 1 THIS REPORT IS EMBARGOED UNTIL 4PM MONDAY 28TH MARCH 2011 THIS REPORT IS EMBARGOED UNTIL 4PM MONDAY 28TH MARCH 2011 SECTION 1 CONTENTS PAGE Contents Page No’s 1. Title Page and Contents 1 - 4 2. List of Victims 5 3. Executive Summary (Including the list of Recommendations and Observations) 6 - 13 4. Introduction 14 - 17 - Introduction 14 - 16 - The Purpose of the Peer Review 16 - 17 5. The Community Served by Cumbria Constabulary 18 - 19 6. Cumbria Constabulary on the morning of the 2nd June 2010 20 7. The Availability of Armed Response Vehicles (ARVs) 21 in Cumbria at the Time of the Incident Being Reported 8. The Events of 2nd June 2010 22 - 54 - Commentary on the sighting of Derrick BIRD by police officers 31 - 33 - The Command and Directions provided by the FIM at this stage 33 - 34 - Radio Command Channel 34 - 36 - Mutual Aid Mobilised 36 - 37 - Cumbria Constabulary and the Ambulance service 37 – 38 - The changing nature of the attacks by Derrick BIRD 38 - 39 - Professional discussion between the review team and the FIM 39 - 40 - Further shootings by Derrick BIRD 40 - Utilisation of a Negotiator 40 - 41 - Incidents at Thornhill and Wilton 41 - 46 - Seascale 46 - 47 - Drigg Road 48 - Eskdale Valley 49 - 52 - The final phase of the Operation to locate Derrick BIRD 52 - 54 9.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING PANEL Date of Meeting: 07/07/2021 Development Control
    To: PLANNING PANEL Development Control Section Date of Meeting: 07/07/2021 Application Number: 4/21/2152/0F1 Application Type: Full : CBC Applicant: Sellafield Ltd Application Address: SELLAFIELD SITE, SEASCALE Proposal ERECTION OF A CNC OPERATIONAL UNIT Parish: Ponsonby, Seascale, Beckermet with Thornhill Recommendation Summary: Approve (commence within 3 years) Crown Copyright. Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Copeland Borough Council Licence No. 100019619 (2005). Reason for Determination by Planning Panel The application is brought for consideration by Members of the Planning Panel as the Planning and Place Manager considers it to be of sufficient importance in planning terms to refer to the Planning Panel for determination. Introduction A major application seeking full planning permission for a new building and associated facilities on the Sellafield Site to provide an operational hub for the Civil Nuclear Constabulary (CNC). Site and Location Sellafield is an existing licensed nuclear site situated on the west coast of Cumbria. It is highly industrialised covering an area of approximately 6km square and accommodating over 1300 buildings of varying sizes. Vehicular access is via the A595T at Blackbeck, Calderbridge and Seascale. Whilst the site does not benefit from any sensitive designations it is situated circa 3km away from the boundary of the Lake District National Park to the east which is a UNESCO World Heritage site. The application site lies within the Sellafield site licensed nuclear boundary on an elevated platform within the North Group Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Yourcumbria Winter 2005
    Your guide to recruitment Inside: Free A-Z guide to council services cumbria.gov.uk W i n t e r 2 0 0 5 School dinners How are school kitchens rising to Jamie Oliver’s challenge? Visit cumbria.gov.uk/jobs No waste like home for more vacancies Can you help tackle Cumbria’s rubbish mountain? While you were sleeping Who’s looking after our roads during the cold icy nights? Competitions - Events in Cumbria - Pull out winter driving leaflet POINT-A4port.ai 8/7/05 11:33:19 am Want to be your own boss? WHATEVER BUSINESS YOU WANT TO BE PLANT TEA SHOP AND GIFTS PLUMBING HIRE BUSINESS BUSINESS BUSINESS The Right Direction for Business Start-up 12 Business Link and our network of delivery partners are here to Point you in the Thinking about right direction. A new and innovative style of providing starting your own support to anybody in Cumbria wishing 06 19 22 to start a business, Point is designed to business? suit the needs of the individual by offering FREE training and advice from Contents experienced Business Advisers, who can We’re listening Historic Cumbria Following the quality also assist with access to funding of up 04 How YourCumbria is 11 Turning back the clock for 20 parish trail Working with people becoming more accessible Carlisle’s Citadel buildings Find out how Lamplugh to £1000. is shaping it’s own future Lessons to be learned No waste like home who are starting out How rally cars are helping Can you help tackle Cumbria’s The white van man Want to be 06 12 your own to teach road safety rubbish mountain? 22 Not all drivers are the same boss? in business? See me after class While you were sleeping School dinners Visit www.pointmeto.co.uk 07 Meet the headmaster who’s 14 Who’s looking after our roads 24 How are school kitchens keeping Cumbria’s schools during the cold icy nights? rising to Jamie Oliver’s to create a personalised on track challenge? For further information on how to get start-up checklist that can Sudoku challenge involved with Point, ring 0845 600 9006 help make your business a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes to a Prosperous Cumbria
    Developing Sustainable Cumbria 2008 to 2028 Routes to a p rosperous Cumbria A review of Cumbria’s transport investment needs Breathtaking coastlines and landscapes of world renown exist alongside historic urban settlements and degraded industrial townscapes of hidden potential contents p4 1 Introduction p5 2 Summary of key transport issues facing Cumbria Sub Region p6-8 3 The Vision for a Modern and Efficient Infrastructure p9 4 Road and Rail Links between the West Coast and M6 and West Coast Main Line p10 5 Morecambe Bay Bridge and West Coast Highway p11 6 West Coast Main Rail Line p12 7 Trans-Pennine Links p13 8 Transport to serve Rural Communities p14-16 9 Reducing Congestion, Climate Change and Improving Public Health p17 10 Air Transport p18 11 Seaports p19-20 12 Capital Funding for the Cumbria Highway and Transport Network p21-22 13 Barrow and Furness p23-26 14 Carlisle and North Cumbria p27-28 15 Lake District National Park p29-31 16 South and East Cumbria p32-35 17 West Cumbria p36 18 Conclusion 3 1 2 Introduction 1.1 This document ‘Routes to a Prosperous 1.4 Proposed transport infrastructure Cumbria’ sets out a vision of an improved transport improvements are developed within the context of infrastructure focussed on economic growth and the Planning System, key objectives of which are quality of place. Its purpose is to demonstrate the to give support to and ensure thriving sustainable level of improvement needed to bring the transport communities, manage resources in a sustainable infrastructure of Cumbria up to a modern standard, way and minimise any environmental impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner of War Camps (1939-1948)
    TWENTIETH CENTURY MILITARY RECORDING PROJECT PRISONER OF WAR CAMPS (1939 – 1948) PROJECT REPORT by ROGER JC THOMAS � English Heritage 2003 The National Monuments Record is the public archive of English Heritage NATIONAL MONUMENTS RECORD CENTRE GREAT WESTERN VILLAGE, KEMBLE DRIVE, SWINDON, SN2 2GZ. Telephone 01793 414700 Facsimile 01793 414707 http: //www.English-heritage.org.uk 1 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 LIST OF TABLES 3 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 DESCRIPTION 5 3 METHODOLOGY 8 3.1 Stage One: Assessment of Cartographic Coverage 3.2 Stage Two: Interpretation of Post-war Vertical Aerial Photographs 3.3 Stage Three: Assessment of Modern Vertical Aerial Photographs 4 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 9 5 PROJECT ANALYSIS 10 5.1 Site Survival 5.2 Change and Destruction 5.3 Recommendations for Further Research 6 REFERENCES 15 7 GAZETTEER LAYOUT 16 8 GAZETTEER 18 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by Keith Buck, Wayne Cocroft, William Foot (DoB), John Harding, Dr Anthony Hellen, John Hellis, Alistair Graham-Kerr, Fiona Matthews (NMRC), James & Lisa McCleod, Dr Mike Osbourne, Medwyn Parry (RCAHMW), and Kelly Scutts (NMRC) in the preparation of this report. 2 TABLES Table 1 Classification of Survival of Known Population (England) Table 2 Classification of Survival of ‘Standard’ type Camps (England) Table 3 Distribution of Sites by County and Class Table 4 Distribution of ‘Standard’ type Camps by County & Class (England) Table 5 Agencies of Destruction of ‘Standard’ type Camps 3 1 INTRODUCTION To date, with a few notable exceptions, very little has been written about World War II Prisoner of War Camps in the British Isles.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Submissions of the Appellant Contents
    Appellant Ref: DB/CD 8.5.1 LPA Ref: 4/94/9011 DOE Ref: APP/HO900/A/94/247019 UNITED KINGDOM NIREX LIMITED Rock Characterisation Facility Longlands Farm, Gosforth, Cumbria CLOSING SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPELLANT CONTENTS Lionel Read QC Robin Barratt QC Neil Cameron David Wolfe 1 February 1996 1 INTRODUCTION 2 THE PRINCIPAL ISSUES 3 THE APPLICATION 4 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5 LOCAL AMENITY 6 EFFECT ON CHARACTERS AND APPEARANCE OF SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE INCLUDING THE NATIONAL PARK 7 SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACT 8 HIGHWAYS AND TRAFFIC 9 CONCLUSION OF PART A 10 NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY 11 BENEFITS 12 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE SITE 13 THE PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT 14 ALTERNATIVE SITES 15 CONDITIONS 16 CONCLUSIONS Back to POE Menu Back to Homepage Appellant Ref: DB/CD 8.5.1 LPA Ref: 4/94/9011 DOE Ref: APP/HO900/A/94/247019 UNITED KINGDOM NIREX LIMITED Rock Characterisation Facility Longlands Farm, Gosforth, Cumbria CLOSING SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPELLANT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is an Inquiry into an appeal by UK Nirex Ltd against a refusal by Cumbria County Council to grant planning permission for a Rock Characterisation Facility ("RCF") at Longlands Farm, Gosforth. The purpose of the development is to carry forward the investigations which Nirex began in 1989 into the potentiality of the site as a location for a deep repository for the disposal of intermediate level radioactive waste. The planning application under appeal is not for such a repository. Nirex have made no decision to propose a repository at Sellafield. Their decision whether to propose a repository at this location depends on the information they will obtain from the RCF.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Deficit
    COPELAND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIT Core Strategy Evidence Base Baseline Analysis Paper February 2011 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction 5 Identifying infrastructure types 18 Transport 24 Energy 77 Water supply and waste water 86 Flooding 101 Telecommunications and information technology 148 Historic legacy 153 Green infrastructure 166 Sports pitches and courts 178 Coast and historic landscapes 190 Social and community infrastructure Affordable housing 195 education 202 employment 225 health 227 post offices 243 Community services 246 Culture and recreation 284 Summary tables 316 List of consultees 329 3 4 INTRODUCTION Background It is recognised that to create sustainable communities, providing housing and employment opportunities alone is not sufficient. There is also a need to provide the schools, health and leisure services. These services are provided by a range of organisations but there is currently little or no integration of that provision to meet the needs of existing communities nor their future needs. The preparation of an integrated Infrastructure Plan is essential for local authorities and their partners to fulfil their place shaping role. The revised Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12)1 identifies the Core Strategy as the to ensure that sus considered sound , the Core Strategy must identify the infrastructure requirements for its area; who will provide it and when. The production of an integrated Infrastructure Plan will also yield significant benefits for their partner organisations need to actively engage in the process. Revisions to Planning Policy Statement 122 have meant that local planning authorities are now required to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of infrastructure delivery in relation to land allocations for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoidable Mortality in Cumbria - a Review of 73 Fatal Road Traffic Collisions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online Avoidable Mortality in Cumbria - A Review of 73 Fatal Road Traffic Collisions April 2015 Rachel E Brown 1 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the following people from Cumbria Constabulary Collision Investigation Unit: Inspector Phil Davidson, Sergeant Graeme Hodgson, PC Diane Bowman, PC Mark Dempster, PC Ian Hanson, PC Craig Irving, PC Mark Andrew Jordan, PC Mike Lazonby, PC Shaun McKeown, PC Phil Murray, PC Steven Wakefield, PC Richard Wiejak, and Inspector Joanne House. Thanks also to Colin Cox, Claire King, Dr Jane Mathieson, and Chris Broadbent from Cumbria County Council, and Dr Gordon Hay and Dr Hannah Timpson from the Centre of Public Health. Centre for Public Health Liverpool John Moores University Henry Cotton Building 15-21 Webster Street Liverpool L3 2ET Telephone: 0151 231 4542 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cph.org.uk 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 6 Definitions and Terminology ............................................................................................. 7 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A595 Whitehaven Study Consultation Analysis Report
    A595 Whitehaven study Consultation Analysis Report November 2019 A595 Whitehaven Study – Consultation Analysis Report Table of Contents 1. Document purpose and structure .................................................................................................. iv 2. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 The study ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 The consultation ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.3 Consultation findings .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Next steps ........................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Options for consultation ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Consultation topic ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]