DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report of the Forty-Second Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report of the Forty-Second Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Final Report of the Forty-second Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Final Report of the Forty-second Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Prague, Czech Republic 1 - 11 July 2019 Volume I Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Buenos Aires 2019 Published by: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Secrétariat du Traité sur l’Antarctique Секретариат Договора об Антарктике Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Maipú 757, Piso 4 C1006ACI Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires - Argentina Tel: +54 11 4320 4260 Fax: +54 11 4320 4253 This book is available in digital form at www.ats.aq and hard copies can be purchased online. ISSN 2346-9897 ISBN (vol. I): 978-987-4024-83-1 ISBN (complete work): 978-987-4024-81-7 Contents VOLUME I Acronyms and Abbreviations 9 PART I. FINAL REPORT 11 1. Final Report 13 2. CEP XXII Report 119 3. Appendices 207 Appendix 1: Prague Declaration on the Occasion of the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty 209 Appendix 2: Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XLIII, Working Groups and Allocation of Items 213 Appendix 3: Host Country Communique 215 PART II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS 217 1. Measures 219 Measure 1 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 123 (Barwick and Balham Valleys, Southern Victoria Land): Revised Management Plan 221 Measure 2 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 128 (Western shore of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan 223 Measure 3 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 141 (Yukidori Valley, Langhovde, Lützow-Holm Bay): Revised Management Plan 225 Measure 4 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 142 (Svarthamaren): Revised Management Plan 227 Measure 5 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 151 (Lions Rump, King George Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan 229 Measure 6 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 154 (Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria Land): Revised Management Plan 231 Measure 7 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 161 (Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea): Revised Management Plan 233 Measure 8 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 171 (Narębski Point, Barton Peninsula, King George Island): Revised Management Plan 235 Measure 9 (2019): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 173 (Cape Washington and Silverfi sh Bay, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea): Revised Management Plan 237 Measure 10 (2019): Antarctic Specially Managed Area No 4 (Deception Island): Revised Management Plan 239 Measure 11 (2019): Antarctic Specially Managed Area No 7 (Southwest Anvers Island and Palmer Basin): Revised Management Plan 241 Measure 12 (2019): Revised List of Antarctic Historic Sites and Monuments: the Wreck of Sir Ernest Shackleton’s vessel Endurance and C.A. Larsen Multiexpedition cairn 243 Annex: Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments 245 2. Decisions 265 Decision 1 (2019): Redesign of the Format of the List of Historic Sites and Monuments 267 Decision 2 (2019): Notifi cation by the Consultative Parties of the list of Observers under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty through the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 269 Decision 3 (2019): Secretariat Report, Programme and Budget 271 Annex 1: Audited Financial Report for 2017/2018 273 Annex 2: Provisional Financial Report for 2018/2019 283 Annex 3: Secretariat Programme 2019/2020 287 Decision 4 (2019): Staff Regulations for the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 301 Annex: Staff Regulations for the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 303 Decision 5 (2019): Multi-year Strategic Work Plan for the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting 315 Annex: ATCM Multi-year Strategic Work Plan 317 Decision 6 (2019): Manual of Regulations and Guidelines Relevant to Tourism and Non-Governmental Activities in Antarctica 321 Annex: Indicative List of Texts that Could Be Included in the Manual 323 Decision 7 (2019): Reviewing Requirements for Exchanging Information on Non-Governmental Expeditions 325 Annex: Information Exchange Requirements 327 3. Resolutions 333 Resolution 1 (2019): Revised Antarctic Clean-Up Manual 335 Annex: Antarctic Clean-Up Manual 337 Resolution 2 (2019): Site Guidelines for Visitors 399 Annex: List of Sites Subject to Site Guidelines 401 Resolution 3 (2019): Visitor Site Guidelines Assessment and Review Checklist 403 Annex: Site Guidelines for Visitors Checklist 405 Resolution 4 (2019): Scientifi c Committee on Antarctic Research’s Code of Conduct for the Use of Animals for Scientifi c Purposes in Antarctica 409 Annex: SCAR’s Code of Conduct for the Use of Animals for Scientifi c Purposes in Antarctica 411 Resolution 5 (2019): Reducing Plastic Pollution in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean 417 Resolution 6 (2019): Hydrographic Mapping of Antarctic Waters 419 Resolution 7 (2019): SCAR’s Sixtieth Anniversary and the Role of SCAR in Providing Scientifi c Advice to Support the Work of the Antarctic Treaty System 421 Heads of Delegation picture 425 VOLUME II Acronyms and Abbreviations PART II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS (Cont.) 4. Management Plans Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 123 (Barwick and Balham Valleys, Southern Victoria Land): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 128 (Western shore of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 141 (Yukidori Valley, Langhovde, Lützow- Holm Bay): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 142 (Svarthamaren): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 151 (Lions Rump, King George Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 154 (Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria Land): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 161 (Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 171 (Narębski Point, Barton Peninsula, King George Island): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 173 (Cape Washington and Silverfi sh Bay, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Managed Area No 4 (Deception Island): Revised Management Plan Antarctic Specially Managed Area No 7 (Southwest Anvers Island and Palmer Basin): Revised Management Plan PART III. OPENING AND CLOSING ADDRESSES AND REPORTS 1. Opening and Closing Addresses Welcoming Remarks by the Minister of Foreign Aff airs of the Czech Republic Mr. Tomas Petricek 2. Reports by Depositaries and Observers Report of the USA as Depositary Government of the Antarctic Treaty and its Protocol Report of Australia as Depositary Government of CCAMLR Report of Australia as Depositary Government of ACAP Report of the UK as Depositary Government of CCAS Report by the CCAMLR Observer Report of SCAR Report of COMNAP 3. Reports by Experts Report by ASOC Report by IAATO Report of WMO PART IV. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FROM ATCM XLII 1. List of Documents Working Papers Information Papers Secretariat Papers Background Papers 2. List of Participants Consultative Parties Non-Consultative Parties Observers, Experts and Guests Host Country Secretariat Antarctic Treaty Secretariat Acronyms and Abbreviations ACAP Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels ACBR Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Region ASMA Antarctic Specially Managed Area ASOC Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition ASPA Antarctic Specially Protected Area ATS Antarctic Treaty System or Antarctic Treaty Secretariat ATCM Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ATCP Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party ATME Antarctic Treaty Meeting of Experts BP Background Paper CCAMLR Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources and/or Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CCAS Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals CCRWP Climate Change Response Work Programme CEE Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation CEP Committee for Environmental Protection COMNAP Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIES Electronic Information Exchange System HCA Hydrographic Committee on Antarctica HSM Historic Site and Monument IAATO International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators IBA Important Bird Area ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICG Intersessional Contact Group IEE Initial Environmental Evaluation IGP&I Clubs International Group of Protection and Indemnity Clubs IHO International Hydrographic Organization IMO International Maritime Organization IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission IOPC Funds International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds IP Information Paper IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature MPA Marine Protected Area NCA National Competent Authority RCC Rescue Coordination Centre SAR Search and Rescue SCAR Scientifi c Committee on Antarctic Research SC-CAMLR Scientifi c Committee of CCAMLR SGCCR Subsidiary Group on Climate Change Response SGMP Subsidiary Group on Management Plans SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea SOOS Southern Ocean Observing System SP Secretariat Paper ToR Term of Reference UAV/RPAS Unmanned Aerial Vehicle / Remotely Piloted Aircraft System UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change VSSOS Vessel-Supported Short Overnight Stay WMO World Meteorological Organization WP Working Paper WTO World Tourism Organization PART I Final Report 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition
    FEDERAL SERVICE OF RUSSIA FOR HYDROMETEOROLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING State Institution “Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition QUARTERLY BULLETIN ʋ2 (51) April - June 2010 STATE OF ANTARCTIC ENVIRONMENT Operational data of Russian Antarctic stations St. Petersburg 2010 FEDERAL SERVICE OF RUSSIA FOR HYDROMETEOROLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING State Institution “Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition QUARTERLY BULLETIN ʋ2 (51) April - June 2010 STATE OF ANTARCTIC ENVIRONMENT Operational data of Russian Antarctic stations Edited by V.V. Lukin St. Petersburg 2010 Editor-in-Chief - M.O. Krichak (Russian Antarctic Expedition –RAE) Authors and contributors Section 1 M. O. Krichak (RAE), Section 2 Ye. I. Aleksandrov (Department of Meteorology) Section 3 G. Ye. Ryabkov (Department of Long-Range Weather Forecasting) Section 4 A. I. Korotkov (Department of Ice Regime and Forecasting) Section 5 Ye. Ye. Sibir (Department of Meteorology) Section 6 I. V. Moskvin, Yu.G.Turbin (Department of Geophysics) Section 7 V. V. Lukin (RAE) Section 8 B. R. Mavlyudov (RAS IG) Section 9 V. L. Martyanov (RAE) Translated by I.I. Solovieva http://www.aari.aq/, Antarctic Research and Russian Antarctic Expedition, Reports and Glossaries, Quarterly Bulletin. Acknowledgements: Russian Antarctic Expedition is grateful to all AARI staff for participation and help in preparing this Bulletin. For more information about the contents of this publication, please, contact Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute of Roshydromet Russian Antarctic Expedition Bering St., 38, St. Petersburg 199397 Russia Phone: (812) 352 15 41; 337 31 04 Fax: (812) 337 31 86 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS PREFACE……………………….…………………………………….………………………….1 1. DATA OF AEROMETEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS AT THE RUSSIAN ANTARCTIC STATIONS…………………………………….…………………………3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Regime Shift in Decreased Sea Ice Production After the Mertz Glacier Calving
    ARTICLE Received 27 Jan 2012 | Accepted 3 Apr 2012 | Published 8 May 2012 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1820 Potential regime shift in decreased sea ice production after the Mertz Glacier calving T. Tamura1,2,*, G.D. Williams2,*, A.D. Fraser2 & K.I. Ohshima3 Variability in dense shelf water formation can potentially impact Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) production, a vital component of the global climate system. In East Antarctica, the George V Land polynya system (142–150°E) is structured by the local ‘icescape’, promoting sea ice formation that is driven by the offshore wind regime. Here we present the first observations of this region after the repositioning of a large iceberg (B9B) precipitated the calving of the Mertz Glacier Tongue in 2010. Using satellite data, we find that the total sea ice production for the region in 2010 and 2011 was 144 and 134 km3, respectively, representing a 14–20% decrease from a value of 168 km3 averaged from 2000–2009. This abrupt change to the regional icescape could result in decreased polynya activity, sea ice production, and ultimately the dense shelf water export and AABW production from this region for the coming decades. 1 National Institute of Polar Research, Tachikawa, Japan. 2 Antarctic Climate & Ecosystem Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. 3 Institute of Low Temperature of Science, Sapporo, Japan. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.T. (email: [email protected]) or to G.D.W. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 3:826 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1820 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula Basecamp Voyages Trip Notes 2021/22
    ANTARCTIC PENINSULA BASECAMP VOYAGES 2021/22 TRIP NOTES ANTARCTIC PENINSULA BASECAMP VOYAGES TRIP NOTES 2021/22 EXPEDITION DETAILS Dates: Trip 1: November 11–23, 2021 Trip 2: December 22 to January 3, 2022 Trip 3: January 3–15, 2022 Trip 4: February 24 to March 8, 2022 Trip 5: March 8–20, 2022 Duration: 13 days Departure: ex Ushuaia, Argentina Price: From US$8,500 per person Weddell Seal. Photo: Ali Liddle Antarctica is seen by many as the ‘Last Frontier’ due to its remote location and difficulty of access; this is a destination very few people have the opportunity to experience. We cross the Drake Passage in our comfortable ship before it becomes our Base Camp for daily activities such as hiking, snowshoeing, kayaking, camping, glacier walking, photo workshops and landings ashore. There is something for everyone and is an opportunity to discover Antarctica at a range of different activity levels. walks across he Antarctic landscapes, photographers to TRIP OVERVIEW explore photo opportunities, campers to enjoy life at shore base camps, kayakers to explore nearby shores, Our Antarctic journeys begin in Ushuaia, Tierra del where the ship cannot go. Passengers who do not wish Fuego, on the southern tip of Argentina. Ushuaia is to be physically active will enjoy our zodiac excursions a bustling port town and its 40,000 inhabitants are and follow the normal shore program and land nestled between the cold mountains and an even excursions—easy to moderate walks and hikes with a colder sea. ‘Downtown’ has plenty of shops including focus on wildlife. internet cafés, cafés, clothes shops, chemists and an array of good restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Amanda Bay, Ingrid Christensen Coast, Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica
    MEASURE 3 - ANNEX Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 169 AMANDA BAY, INGRID CHRISTENSEN COAST, PRINCESS ELIZABETH LAND, EAST ANTARCTICA Introduction Amanda Bay is located on the Ingrid Christensen Coast of Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica at 69°15' S, 76°49’59.9" E. (Map A). The Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) is designated to protect the breeding colony of several thousand pairs of emperor penguins annually resident in the south-west corner of Amanda Bay, while providing for continued collection of valuable long- term research and monitoring data and comparative studies with colonies elsewhere in East Antarctica. Only two other emperor penguin colonies along the extensive East Antarctic coastline are protected within ASPAs (ASPA 120, Point Géologie Archipelago and ASPA 167 Haswell Island). Amanda Bay is more easily accessed, from vessels or by vehicle from research stations in the Larsemann Hills and Vestfold Hills, than many other emperor penguin colonies in East Antarctica. This accessibility is advantageous for research purposes, but also creates the potential for human disturbance of the birds. The Antarctic coastline in the vicinity of Amanda Bay was first sighted and named the Ingrid Christensen Coast by Captain Mikkelsen in command of the Norwegian ship Thorshavn on 20 February 1935. Oblique aerial photographs of the coastline were taken by the Lars Christensen expedition in 1937 and by the US Operation Highjump in 1947 for reconnaissance purposes. In the 1954/55 summer, the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition (ANARE) on the Kista Dan explored the waters of Prydz Bay, and the first recorded landing in the area was made by a sledging party led by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report 2019
    Report Monitoring report 2019 BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT | 1 Monitoring report 2019 in accordance with section 63(3) in conjunction with section 35 of the Energy Industry Act (EnWG) and section 48(3) in conjunction with section 53(3) of the Competition Act (GWB) Editorial deadline: 27 November 2019 2 | BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Bundeskartellamt Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen Referat 603 Arbeitsgruppe Energie-Monitoring Tulpenfeld 4 Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 16 53113 Bonn 53113 Bonn [email protected] [email protected] BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT | 3 German Energy Industry Act section 63(3) Reporting (3) Once a year, the Bundesnetzagentur shall publish a report on its activities and in agreement with the Bundeskartellamt, to the extent that aspects of competition are concerned, on the results of its monitoring activities, and shall submit the report to the European Commission and the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). The report shall include the report by the Bundeskartellamt on the results of its monitoring activities under section 48(3) in conjunction with section 53(3) of the Competition Act as prepared in agreement with the Bundesnetzagentur to the extent that aspects of regulation of the distribution networks are concerned. The report shall include general instructions issued by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy in accordance with section 61. German Competition Act section 53(3) Activity report and monitoring reports (3) At least every two years, as part of its monitoring activities pursuant to section 48(3) sentence 1, the Bundeskartellamt shall prepare a report on the competitive conditions in the electricity generation market.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabirds of Human Settlements in Antarctica: a Case Study of the Mirny Station
    CZECH POLAR REPORTS 11 (1): 98-113, 2021 Seabirds of human settlements in Antarctica: A case study of the Mirny Station Sergey Golubev Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Nekouzskii raion, Yaroslavl oblast, 152742, Russia Abstract Antarctica is free of urbanisation, however, 40 year-round and 32 seasonal Antarctic stations operate there. The effects of such human settlements on Antarctic wildlife are insufficiently studied. The main aim of this study was to determine the organization of the bird population of the Mirny Station. The birds were observed on the coast of the Davis Sea in the Mirny (East Antarctica) from January 8, 2012 to January 7, 2013 and from January 9, 2015 to January 9, 2016. The observations were carried out mainly on the Radio and Komsomolsky nunataks (an area of about 0.5 km²). The duration of observations varied from 1 to 8 hours per day. From 1956 to 2016, 13 non-breeding bird species (orders Sphenisciformes, Procellariiformes, Charadriiformes) were recorded in the Mirny. The South polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) and Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) form the basis of the bird population. South polar skuas are most frequently recorded at the station. Less common are Brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi) and Adélie penguins. Adélie penguins, Wilson's storm petrels (Oceanites oceanicus), South polar and Brown skuas are seasonal residents, the other species are visitors. Adélie penguins, Emperor (Aptenodytes forsteri), Macaroni (Eudyptes chrysolophus) and Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica), Wilson's storm petrels, South polar and Brown skuas interacted with the station environment, using it for com- fortable behavior, feeding, molting, shelter from bad weather conditions, and possible breeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 236
    Science in the Snow Appendix 1 SCAR Members Full members (31) (Associate Membership) Full Membership Argentina 3 February 1958 Australia 3 February 1958 Belgium 3 February 1958 Chile 3 February 1958 France 3 February 1958 Japan 3 February 1958 New Zealand 3 February 1958 Norway 3 February 1958 Russia (assumed representation of USSR) 3 February 1958 South Africa 3 February 1958 United Kingdom 3 February 1958 United States of America 3 February 1958 Germany (formerly DDR and BRD individually) 22 May 1978 Poland 22 May 1978 India 1 October 1984 Brazil 1 October 1984 China 23 June 1986 Sweden (24 March 1987) 12 September 1988 Italy (19 May 1987) 12 September 1988 Uruguay (29 July 1987) 12 September 1988 Spain (15 January 1987) 23 July 1990 The Netherlands (20 May 1987) 23 July 1990 Korea, Republic of (18 December 1987) 23 July 1990 Finland (1 July 1988) 23 July 1990 Ecuador (12 September 1988) 15 June 1992 Canada (5 September 1994) 27 July 1998 Peru (14 April 1987) 22 July 2002 Switzerland (16 June 1987) 4 October 2004 Bulgaria (5 March 1995) 17 July 2006 Ukraine (5 September 1994) 17 July 2006 Malaysia (4 October 2004) 14 July 2008 Associate Members (12) Pakistan 15 June 1992 Denmark 17 July 2006 Portugal 17 July 2006 Romania 14 July 2008 261 Appendices Monaco 9 August 2010 Venezuela 23 July 2012 Czech Republic 1 September 2014 Iran 1 September 2014 Austria 29 August 2016 Colombia (rejoined) 29 August 2016 Thailand 29 August 2016 Turkey 29 August 2016 Former Associate Members (2) Colombia 23 July 1990 withdrew 3 July 1995 Estonia 15 June
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND
    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND Introduction North-East Bailey Peninsula (66°16’59.9"S, 110°31’59.9"E) is located approximately 200m east of Australia’s Casey station, in the Windmill Islands region of the Budd Coast, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. It was designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No 16 under Recommendation XIII-8 (1985), after a proposal by Australia. In accordance with Decision 1 (2002) the site was redesignated and renumbered as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No 135. Revised management plans for the Area were adopted under Measure 2 (2003) and Measure 8 (2008). The ASPA is designated primarily as a scientific reference site which, since the early 1980s, has supported a range of studies into the diverse assemblage of vegetation found in the area. The close proximity of the Area to Casey station allows ease of access for field research but also creates the potential for disturbance of study areas. 1. Description of values to be protected The North-east Bailey Peninsula Antarctic Specially Protected Area (the Area) is representative of a diverse assemblage of the Windmill Islands region flora. As such, the Area has intrinsic ecological value and scientific importance, particularly to botanists, microbiologists, soil scientists and glacial geomorphologists. The Area contains three extensive and contrasting moss fields that have been the subject of taxonomic, ecological and physiological studies since the summer of 1982/83. Additional studies have included population ecology of invertebrates associated with the vegetation, and soil/water chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • ~©L%~Bulletin No
    The International Council for Science ~©L%~bulletin No. 150 July 2003 Measures, Decisions and Resolutions adopted at the Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 p 1 = Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR BULLETIN No 150, July 2003 Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 Decisions, Resolutions and Measures MEASURE 1 (2002) Antarctic Protected Area System: Management Plans Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 124, Cape for Antarctic Specially Protected Areas Crozier, Ross Island; The Representatives, Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 126, Byers Recalling Resolution 1 (1998) allocating responsibility Peninsula, Livingston Island; among Consultative Parties for the revision of Management Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 130, "Tram­ Plans for Protected areas; way Ridge", Mount Erebus, Ross Island; Noting that the draft Management Plans appended to this • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 137, North­ Measure have been endorsed by the Committee for west White Island, McMurdo Sound; Environmentqal Protection and the Scientific Committee • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 147, Abla­ on Antarctic Research (SCAR); tion Point - Ganymede Heights; Recognizing that these Areas support outstanding natural Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 148, Mount features and biota of scientific interest; Flora, Hope Bay; Recommend to their Governments the following Measure Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 157, Back­ for approval in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6 of door Bay, Cape Royds, Ross Island. Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to and which are annexed to this Measure, be adopted.
    [Show full text]