DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring Report 2019 Report Monitoring report 2019 BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT | 1 Monitoring report 2019 in accordance with section 63(3) in conjunction with section 35 of the Energy Industry Act (EnWG) and section 48(3) in conjunction with section 53(3) of the Competition Act (GWB) Editorial deadline: 27 November 2019 2 | BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Bundeskartellamt Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen Referat 603 Arbeitsgruppe Energie-Monitoring Tulpenfeld 4 Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 16 53113 Bonn 53113 Bonn [email protected] [email protected] BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT | 3 German Energy Industry Act section 63(3) Reporting (3) Once a year, the Bundesnetzagentur shall publish a report on its activities and in agreement with the Bundeskartellamt, to the extent that aspects of competition are concerned, on the results of its monitoring activities, and shall submit the report to the European Commission and the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). The report shall include the report by the Bundeskartellamt on the results of its monitoring activities under section 48(3) in conjunction with section 53(3) of the Competition Act as prepared in agreement with the Bundesnetzagentur to the extent that aspects of regulation of the distribution networks are concerned. The report shall include general instructions issued by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy in accordance with section 61. German Competition Act section 53(3) Activity report and monitoring reports (3) At least every two years, as part of its monitoring activities pursuant to section 48(3) sentence 1, the Bundeskartellamt shall prepare a report on the competitive conditions in the electricity generation market. Monitoring Report data origin Unless otherwise indicated, the figures in this report have been taken from the data collected during the monitoring survey carried out annually by the Bundesnetzagentur and the Bundeskartellamt. Undertakings that are active on the electricity or gas market in Germany provide data for the survey on all aspects of the value added chain (generation, network operation, metering operations, trade, marketing etc). Further data on trade is supplied by the electricity and gas stock exchanges, and by energy brokers. All the data is checked for plausibility and validated by the Bundesnetzagentur and the Bundeskartellamt. In 2019, some 6,500 undertakings overall supplied data to the two authorities. Thus the degree of coverage in each market segment, as reflected by the level of response, was well over 95% and in many areas it reached 100%. Any discrepancies between this and other data are the result of different data sources, definitions and survey periods. BUNDESNETZAGENTUR | BUNDESKARTELLAMT | 5 Foreword The energy transition and climate targets continue to shape developments in the electricity and gas markets in Germany. These developments are documented and analysed in this Monitoring Report. Consumers remain in the spotlight this year. The monitoring carried out by the Bundesnetzagentur and the Bundeskartellamt aims to inform consumers, create transparency in the market and provide an analysis of developments in competition. The market share of the five biggest electricity producers – and thus the concentration on the conventional electricity generation market – continued to decline overall. However, power within the group has shifted in recent years, particularly due to Vattenfall's sale of its lignite activities to LEAG and the takeover of E.ON subsidiary Uniper by Finnish company Fortum. While RWE is the market leader by some distance, its share does not suggest that it has a dominant position. As part of its examination of the plans to merge RWE and E.ON, the Bundeskartellamt carried out a pivotal analysis, which revealed that RWE was indeed pivotal – that is to say, indispensable – for meeting electricity demand for a fairly significant number of hours over the year, but not to an extent that would lead to a presumption of market dominance. The Bundeskartellamt will further pursue its analysis in its forthcoming report on the competitive conditions in the field of electricity generation (market power report). The energy transition continues to make progress. As in previous years, conventionally generated electricity is losing ground to electricity from renewable sources. The increase in electricity from renewables was smaller in 2018, particularly because of the decline in new build projects, but even so, 37% of domestic gross electricity consumption was generated from renewable energy – a record high. New solar photovoltaic installations helped achieve this level, while fewer new wind turbines were added both onshore and offshore. Despite the increase in electricity generated by installations receiving payments under the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), the total amount of EEG payments fell for the first time in 2018 compared to previous years. The decrease was due in particular to the comparatively high electricity prices. These affect the level of the statutory payments for installations marketed directly by the producers, which make up the overwhelming majority of this generation. The far-reaching changes in electricity generation have a direct impact on the grid and require significant adjustments to it. The expansion of the grid continues to lag behind where it needs to be. Apart from the rollout of new infrastructure, the implementation of specific measures to optimise and increase the utilisation of the existing electricity networks is becoming more and more important. These measures are already taken into account when sizing long-term grid expansion plans. The reorganisation of electricity production, coupled with the delays in the rollout of grid infrastructure, is making it necessary for transmission system operators to intervene regularly in generation in order to maintain system security. The volume of these electricity-related and voltage-related redispatching measures, which are used to adjust electricity feed-in from conventional generating installations to relieve overloading of power lines, remained at a high level in 2018, although it was down on the previous year. The volume of renewable energy installations curtailed by feed-in management measures was almost unchanged in 6 | FOREWORD comparison to the previous year, with the proportion of electricity from renewables that was able to be transported remaining constant at 97%. Electricity network charges rose in 2019 despite some cost components being transferred to the offshore network surcharge. The increase was due to the rising costs for the electricity grid expansion at all levels and the high projected costs for system security measures. Average wholesale electricity prices were again considerably higher in 2018, this time by about 22%. By contrast, liquidity on the wholesale electricity trading markets developed in different directions, with day- ahead trading falling while intraday trading showed significant growth. The volume of futures trading registered growth too following the de facto split in the German-Austrian market area from 1 October 2018, which had a significant effect on the structure of the relevant trading products. There was also a clear increase in gas wholesale prices in 2018, while liquidity in wholesale gas trading declined overall. As in previous years, the combined market shares of the largest electricity and gas suppliers for standard load profile and interval-metered customers in the respective retail markets were clearly below the statutory thresholds for presuming market dominance. Nevertheless, the positive developments on the retail electricity and gas markets stalled in many areas. Supplier switching rates, for example, remained more or less unchanged in 2018. The number of providers available to consumers stabilised at its already high level. On the reference date of 1 April 2019, the average electricity price for household customers was over 30 ct/kWh for the first time. Gas prices for household customers, meanwhile, recorded a year-on-year increase after several years of decline. Electricity and gas prices for commercial and industrial customers rose as well, but rather less steeply. The price rises that occurred during the reporting year were primarily accounted for by the price components controlled by the supplier, as the higher prices that had already been seen on the wholesale markets in the previous year were passed on to end customers. There was good news regarding electricity and gas disconnections. The number of connections, which are carried out when customers do not pay their bills, dropped in both sectors in 2018. Germany's position as a natural gas transit country for Europe is strengthening, with a rise in natural gas imports and exports from the previous year. Germany remains dependent on natural gas imports owing to the continued decline in domestic production. The country's storage levels from existing gas storage facilities reached a new high at the beginning of the withdrawal period in early November 2019, giving a boost to supply security in the natural gas sector. The low average interruption duration per connected final consumer – less than a minute in the year – also indicates the high supply quality of the German gas network. The conversion of the German L-gas networks to H-gas supply, which is affecting a lot of private consumers in particular, is going ahead as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case No COMP/M.2822- ENBW/ENI/GVS REGULATION (EEC)
    EN Case No COMP/M.2822- ENBW/ENI/GVS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 8 (2) Date: 17/12/2002 This text is made available for information purposes only and does not constitute an official publication. The official text of the decision will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Commission Decision of 17/12/2002 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.2822–EnBW / ENI / GVS) (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 57(2)(a) thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/972, and in particular Article 8(2) and 22 (3) thereof, Having regard to the Commission's decision of 16 September 2002 to initiate proceedings in this case, Having regard to the opinion of the Advisory Committee on Concentrations3, Having regard to the final report of the hearing officer in this case4 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1; corrected version in OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13. 2 OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1. 3 OJ C ...,...200. , p.... 4 … Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbw Integrated Annual Report 2019
    Integrated Annual Report 2019 Excluding the notes and the declaration of corporate management +++ In light of recent events +++ Dear Reader, We are currently facing unprecedented challenges due to the corona pandemic. Overcoming this crisis will require solidarity, understanding and a collective effort from all of us. Just like all energy companies, we have a special responsibility during this time and it is something we are all too willing to take on. As an operator of critical infrastructure, we know how to handle these types of challenges and already began to prepare ourselves at an early stage for the possibility that this outbreak would become a serious pandemic: We have phased contingency plans in place that are practised on a regular basis. An expert task force is working closely together with all specialist departments at our company and with external bodies. While many employees are keeping our day-to-day business running by working from home, the operational teams responsible for our power plants, grid control centres, the supply of water and the disposal of waste are ensuring that our energy supply system is also working safely and reliably during this difficult time. Furthermore, we are endeavouring within the scope of our capabilities to provide support to our partners using the expertise we have in the technical management of crisis situations. We want to remove any additional burden on our customers by restoring the connections to any cut-off electricity or gas supplies and we are also available to help our customers in any other way we can to the very best of our abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Investments in the EU: a Comparative Analysis of French And
    F F i i SF M (2012-2019) Chinese investments in the EU: a comparative analysis of French and German leaders' discourse (2012-2019) ”F w”Mu NF” F 6691021- F447112 F Acknowledgements: I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, professor Gustaaf Geeraerts. He skillfully guided me throughout the year to make me learn how to seleCt an interesting topiC, how to use theory to frame a research, and how to make full use of disCourse analysis in order to write an attraCtive thesis. In spite of the disruptions Caused by the Covid-19 pandemiC, he remained always ready to answer my questions and provide adviCe, and for this I want to thank him. I also wish to thank professor Sun Fanglu (), my program Coordinator, for her suggestion of Chinese investments in Europe as a Case study. It turned out to be an incredibly riCh and multi-faCeted topiC, whiCh gave its full strength and depth to this study. Her unfailing availability and dediCation to support me and my Classmates all over the year, and espeCially after the virus outbreak, were extremely valuable. I am also indebted to other professors who gave me preCious adviCe all over the research and writing process. Their help enabled me to make this thesis more preCise and rigorous: professor Andrea Ghiselli, professor He Ping (), professor Zeng Qingjie (), professor Zheng Yu (), professor Xiao Jialing (), professor Zuo Cai () and other anonymous reviewers. I wish to express my very warm thanks to my parents and sister, who tirelessly encouraged me and showed their support.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Region for Electric Mobility: North Rhine-Westphalia Come on Board, Join the Ride!
    Model region for electric mobility: North Rhine-Westphalia Come on board, join the ride! n an internationally networked and globalized world, mobility kilometres are freeways. The state thus possesses one of the densest Iis the key to economic success. Regardless of whether we look at road networks on the European continent and an outstanding basis individual or business transportation, mobility today is based largely for the development of a user-oriented infrastructure for the operation on conventional internal combustion engines. This has a considerable of electric cars. Numerous inner city parking garages, parking lots and impact on our environment causing CO2 and noise emissions, more a network of around 3,300 filling stations can be used to establish traffic congestion and traffic jams. charging stations. These problems are set to worsen rapidly over the next 20 years. North Rhine-Westphalia is a major metropolitan region with a strong Experts expect that there will be 4.5 times more vehicles registered industrial basis. The automotive sector is traditionally an important in 2030 than today, due in particular to the huge pent-up demand cluster. Every year, around 800,000 passenger cars and commercial for individual mobility in the emerging and very heavily populated vehicles come off the assembly lines of the production facilities industrial nations such as China and India, as well as the countries of in Cologne (Ford-Werke GmbH), Bochum (Adam Opel GmbH) and South America. The efficient use of resources and the development Düsseldorf (Daimler AG ). Added to this are trailers, semi-trailers and of new technologies must therefore be central to research.
    [Show full text]
  • Wooden Housing Industry
    Research Report Wooden Housing Industry Export Potential of the German market Andrea Kuiken & Anders Melander Jönköping University Jönköping International Business School JIBS Research Reports No. 2019-1, 2019 Research Report in Business Administration Wooden Housing Industry - Export Potential of the German market JIBS Research Reports No. 2019-1 © 2019 Andrea Kuiken, Anders Melander and Jönköping International Business School Publisher: Jönköping International Business School P.O. Box 1026 SE-551 11 Jönköping Tel.: +46 36 10 10 00 www.ju.se Printed by BrandFactory AB, 2019 ISSN 1403-0462 ISBN 978-91-86345-94-5 2 Acknowledgement We thank Frans and Carl Kempes memorial foundation (Frans och Carl Kempes minnesstiftelse) for the funding of this project. In order to understand the opportunities and challenges in the German market, it was essential to talk with practitioners. We would like to thank Ants Suurkuusk, Jan Dahlgrun and representatives from Villa Vida, Eksjöhus, Rörvikshus, Anebyhus, Götenehus, Trivselhus, Aladomo, Berg Schwedenhauser Begus, Baufritz, Dalahaus, Fjorborg, GfG Schwedenhauser, Hansahus, HarmonyHome, Nordhus, Nordic Haus, Plenter Immobilien, Sunfjord, Swedhouse for their time and contributions to our study. Moreover, valuable information on industry norms and regulations was provided by respondents from the German Bundesgütegemeinschaft Deutscher Fertigbau, Gütegemeinschaft Deutscher Fertigbau, Institut für Bauforschung, and the Swedish FEBY. During the data collection process, we received support from German-speaking research assistants to facilitate the data collection in Germany. We would like to thank Xhulio Bejkollari, Henry Ngilorit, Frederik-Robert Fabisch, Ado Omerhodzic, Laura Matthiesen, Marie-Sophie Westbrock, Per Lundin, Sebastian Mohr and Carina Rinke for their contributions by conducting part of the interviews and collecting secondary data.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of the Enbw Baltic 1 Offshore Wind Farm: “Baltic 1 Was A
    2 May 2021 Press Release » Ten years of the EnBW Baltic 1 offshore wind farm: “Baltic 1 was a real pioneer accomplishment.” Germany’s first commercial offshore wind farm / wind yields and technical availability well above expectations Karlsruhe/Hamburg/Stralsund. Ten years ago, EnBW took into operation what was then Germany’s first commercial offshore wind farm, the 48.3 megawatt Baltic 1 in the Baltic Sea. Since then, EnBW has built three more offshore wind farms in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, with a combined capacity of 976 MW. The next big wind farm, the 900 megawatt He Dreiht, is set to go on stream in 2025 in the North Sea – completely free of feed-in subsidies. EnBW is also developing further international offshore projects. Systematic expansion of renewables, and offshore wind energy especially, is now a strategic focus. “Baltic 1 was a real pioneer accomplishment in Germany and for EnBW. It enabled us to show that offshore wind farms are an economic proposition here,” said EnBW CEO Frank Mastiaux. Since then, EnBW has contributed to the energy transition by investing around €5 billion in expanding renewables, including around €3.6 billion in offshore wind farms alone. “Offshore wind energy is and will remain one of our important growth areas.” Control centre and service base in Barhöft near Stralsund Baltic 1 is located 16 kilometres off the coast and is operated from the port of Barhöft, 18 kilometres from Stralsund. Barhöft is home to EnBW’s service base and control centre. Eight service technicians are assigned to Baltic 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbw and Bp to Jointly Develop Offshore Wind Farms in the UK Following Key Auction Win
    8 February 2021 Press Release » EnBW and bp to jointly develop offshore wind farms in the UK following key auction win Karlsruhe/Hamburg/London. Karlsruhe-based EnBW and bp plan to jointly develop offshore wind farms off the coasts of Great Britain in a 50:50 partnership. An important first milestone has now been reached: In the auction for the award of seabed rights by The Crown Estate in the UK, the two partners secured two large areas in the Irish Sea that are estimated to be the highest-value areas in the first auction of offshore wind rights in England and Wales for ten years. EnBW and bp plan to build two offshore wind farms there with a combined capacity of three gigawatts, that is enough to power the equivalent of 3.4 million households. “We are delighted with this auction win in a tough international bidder field. The award confirms that bp and EnBW are the right partners with the right strategy and the right capabilities. EnBW is among today’s leaders in advanced offshore wind technology. In partnership with bp, a major player with international experience in the offshore business, we will once again contribute significantly to a climate-friendly energy future in the UK, which is currently the world’s largest market for offshore wind power”, said EnBW CEO Frank Mastiaux. “Our bids prevailed for the most attractive areas in the auction that stand out for above average wind conditions and favourable prospects in terms of approval,” added Dirk Güsewell, head of renewable energy portfolio development at EnBW.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE EWE and EnBW conclude restructuring of their EWE shareholdings Aktiengesellschaft Tirpitzstrasse 39 26122 Oldenburg EWE transfers shares in VNG to EnBW / Contact: EnBW shareholding in EWE falls from 26 to six per cent Christian Blömer T:+49 441 4805 - 1810 Email: Oldenburg/Karlsruhe, Germany, 20 April 2016. The utility companies EWE AG christian.bloemer@ew (Oldenburg), EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Karlsruhe) and Ems- e.de Weser-Elbe Versorgungs- und Entsorgungsverband (Oldenburg) have today concluded the fundamental restructuring of their shareholdings. EnBW now has a Contact: 74.2 per cent shareholding in VNG Verbundnetz Gas Aktiengesellschaft (VNG). Dr. Jens Schreiber At the same time, EWE-Verband and EWE itself have today both acquired ten T:+49 721 63 - 14320 percent of EWE shares from EnBW. Six per cent of EWE shares will remain in Email:[email protected] om the possession of EnBW until 2019, when they will be acquired by EWE-Verband EnBW Energie Baden- at the latest. EWE-Verband and EWE intend to find a new strategic partner for Württemberg AG EWE by 2019 at the latest. Durlacher Allee 93 Matthias Brückmann, CEO of EWE AG: “We are happy that we were able to conclude the transaction agreed last autumn as planned. Now we have to start preparing to look for a new strategic partner from 2017 or a consortium of several companies. We want to find a partner who supports our path towards a safe, clean and digitalised energy future, and we are convinced that this will be possible by working together with our communal shareholders.” Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Factbook 2019
    EnBW Factbook 2019 » October 2019 Agenda 1 − EnBW at a glance 1. EnBW at a glance...................................................................... page 3 »» 5. EnBW’s Main Shareholdings..........................................page 111 »» › Key financials › Energiedienst Holding AG › Key non-financials › Pražská energetika, a. s. › Stadtwerke Düsseldorf Group › VNG AG 2. Environment................................................................................ page 6 »» › Borusan EnBW Enerji yatırımları ve Üretim A.S › Political environment › Regulatory environment 6. Key Financials and Non-financials........................... page 130 »» › Markets › Five-year summary › Fiscal year 2018 3. Strategy ......................................................................................... page 34 »» › Half year 2019 › EnBW 2020 Strategy › Finance strategic and other goal dimensions › EnBW 2025 Strategy › Further strategic aspects: 7. Capital Markets ......................................................................page 143 »» Broadband, Contracting, Digitization, Research and Development, Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, › Financial Asset Management Decarbonisation, Corporate Governance, › Bonds Compliance, Data Protection › Maturity profile › Credit Ratings › Shareholder structure 4. Business Segments ............................................................. page 66 »» › Share › Sales › Key financial indicators › Grids › Renewable Energies 8. Service .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-12-08 VGB Aufsatz Englisch
    English translation including amendments and the content of the following paper: Krüger, K., Rotering, N.: Energiewende erfolgreich gestalten durch Pumpspeicherausbau. p. 37-44, VGB PowerTech, 09/2014. Successful energy transition in Germany by pumped storage expansion Dr.-Ing. Klaus Krüger, Voith Hydro Holding GmbH & Co KG, Leiter F&E, Heidenheim; Dr.-Ing. Niklas Rotering, Institut für Elektrische Anlagen und Energiewirtschaft RWTH Aachen, Forschungsgruppe Versorgungsqualität & Regulierung 1 Abstract Operational flexibility in electrical energy generation and consumption as well as the provision of reliable available capacity are two major challenges of the German energy transition. The consistent deployment of cost-effective and proven pumped storage technology can provide significant contributions to meet both challenges. This paper shows that an expansion of pumped storage plants as part of the energy transition is a technically and macro-economically interesting option for Germany. Two future scenarios are investigated, one assumes an energy supply in 2030 with a 60% share of renewable energy and another expects a renewable energy share of 80% in 2050. A central result of the investigations is that the appropriate operation of the existing pumped storage inventory and its further expansion can provide significant system adequacy and reduces the necessary fossil fuel power plant capacity for providing reliable available capacity. In a scenario with 80% renewable energy 23 GW pumped storage plants replace up to 16.6 GW thermal power plants. In addition, the pumped storage power plants significantly reduce renewable energy curtailment and substitute generation from fossil fuels when releasing the stored energy. This also contributes to an overall reduction of CO 2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Volkswagen Financial Services Ag Annual Report 2017
    VOLKSWAGEN FINANCIAL SERVICES AG ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Key Figures VOLKSWAGEN FINANCIAL SERVICES AG 1 In € million (as of December 31) 2017 2016 Total assets 68,953 130,248 Loans to and receivables from customers attributable to Retail financing 16,269 41,726 Dealer financing 3,584 14,638 Leasing business 18,809 34,344 Lease assets 11,571 14,696 Equity 7,624 16,951 Operating profit2 609 609 Profit before tax2 643 615 In % (as of December 31) 2017 2016 Cost/income ratio3 73 89 Equity ratio4 11.1 13.0 Return on equity5 8.4 8.1 Number (as of December 31) 2017 2016 Employees 8,555 11,819 Germany 5,198 6,145 International 3,357 5,674 1 Previous year restated as explained in the disclosures on the leasing business in the United Kingdom and Irish markets and in the disclosures on the separately recognized derivatives in the United Kingdom market in the section entitled “Restated Prior-Year Figures” in the notes. 2 Previous year restated as explained in the disclosures relating to the discontinued operations in the section entitled “Restated Prior-Year Figures” in the notes. 3 General and administrative expenses, adjusted for expenses passed on to other entities in the Volkswagen Group / net income from lending, leasing and insurance transactions (after provision for credit risks) and net fee and commission income. 4 Equity / total assets. 5 Profit before tax / average equity. Due to the reorganization of the legal entities, return on equity for 2017 and 2016 is determined using only the equity as of December 31, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Factbook 2018
    EnBW Factbook 2018 » October 2018 Agenda 1 − EnBW at a glance 1. EnBW at a glance......................................................................page 3 »» 5. EnBW’s Main Shareholdings..........................................page 114 »» › Key financials › EnergieDienst Holding AG › Key non-financials › Pražská energetika, a. s. › Stadtwerke Düsseldorf Group › VNG AG 2. Environment................................................................................ page 6 »» › Political environment 6. Key Financials and Non-financials........................... page131 »» › Regulatory environment › Markets › Five-year summary › Fiscal year 2017 › Half year 2018 3. Strategy ......................................................................................... page 38 »» › Finance strategic and other goal dimensions › EnBW 2020 Strategy › EnBW 2025 Strategy 7. Capital Markets ...................................................................... page 143 »» › Further strategic aspects: Broadband, Contracting, Research and Development, › Asset Liability Management Model Innovation, Digitalisation, Corporate Sustainability, › Bonds Decarbonisation, Corporate Governance, › Maturity profile Compliance, Data Protection › Credit Ratings › Shareholder structure › Share 4. Segments ..................................................................................... page 76 »» › Key financial indicators › Sales › Grids 8. Service .......................................................................................... page 155 »» › Renewable
    [Show full text]