Hampshire Views Issue 20 | Spring/Summer 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River -
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62 -
Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries. -
Fleet Pond Management Plan
Fleet Pond Management Plan 2015 – 2020 1. Introduction and Site Information 5 1.1. Preamble 5 1.2. General Information 6 1.2.1. Location 6 1.2.2. Land Tenure 7 1.2.3. Management Infrastructure and Resources 7 1.2.4. Health, Safety and Security 8 1.3. Site Information 10 1.3.1. Site Map 10 1.3.2. Access and Structures 10 1.3.3. Physical 14 1.3.3.1. Climate 14 1.3.3.2. Hydrology 14 1.3.3.3. Geology 15 1.3.3.4. Geomorphology 15 1.3.3.5. Soils 16 1.3.4. Biological 16 1.3.4.1. Communities 16 1.3.5. Cultural 16 1.3.5.1. Archaeology and Past Land Use 16 1.3.5.2. Present Land Use 17 1.3.5.3. Present Conservation Status 18 1.3.5.4. Environmental Relationships and Implications for 18 Management 1.3.5.5. Surrounding Landscape 19 1.3.6. Restoration Project 20 2. Management and Site Features 21 2.1. Management 21 2.1.1. Aims 21 2.1.2. Management Rationale 22 2.1.3. Management Options 22 2.1.4. Vision 22 2.2. Site Features 23 2.2.1. Overview of Site Features 23 2.2.1.1. Rarity of Features 23 2.2.1.2. Fragility of Features 23 2.2.2. Factors Affecting the Management of the Features 24 2.2.2.1. On Site Natural Factors 24 2.2.2.2. On Site Man-induced Factors 25 2.2.2.3. -
Jan to Jun 2011
Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Isle of Wight Branch Page 1 of 18 Butterfly Conservation Hampshire and Saving butterflies, moths and our environment Isle of Wight Branch HOME ABOUT US EVENTS CONSERVATION HANTS & IOW SPECIES SIGHTINGS PUBLICATIONS LINKS MEMBER'S AREA Thursday 30th June Christine Reeves reports from Ash Lock Cottage (SU880517) where the following observations were made: Purple Emperor (1 "Rather battered specimen"). "Following the excitement of seeing our first Purple Emperor inside our office yesterday, exactly the same thing happened again today at around 9.45am. The office door was open and we spotted a butterfly on the inside of the window, on closer inspection we realised it was a Purple Emperor. It was much smaller than the one we had seen the day before and more battered. However we were able to take pictures of it, in fact the butterfly actually climbed onto one of the cameras and remained there for a while. It then climbed from camera to hand, and we took it outside for more pictures before it eventually flew off. It seemed to be feeding off the hand.". Purple Empeor Purple Empeor Terry Hotten writes: "A brief walk around Hazeley Heath this morning produced a fresh Small Tortoiseshell along with Marbled Whites, Silver- studded Blues in reasonable numbers along with Meadow Browns, Ringlets and Large and Small Skippers." peter gardner reports from highcross froxfield (SU712266) where the following observations were made: Red Admiral (1 "purched on an hot window "). Red Admiral (RWh) Bob Whitmarsh reports from Plague Pits Valley, St Catherine's Hill (SU485273) where the following observations were made: Marbled White (23), Meadow Brown (41), Small Heath (7), Small Skipper (2), Ringlet (2), Red Admiral (3), Small Tortoiseshell (4), Small White (2), Comma (1). -
Thames Basin Heath
Appendix JO5: Countryside Character – Volume 7: South-East and London’ National Character Area 129: Thames Basin Heath 59 Countryside Character Volume 7: South East & London The character of England’s natural and man-made landscape 60 Contents page Chairman’s Foreword 4 Areas covered by more than one 1 volume are shown Introduction 5 hatched 2 3 The character of England 5 The Countryside Agency and 8 4 countryside character 5 6 How we have defined the character of 8 England’s countryside – The National Mapping project 8 7 – Character of England map: a joint approach 11 8 – Describing the character of England 11 The character of England: shaping the future 11 This is volume 7 of 8 covering the character of England Character Areas page page 81 Greater Thames Estuary 13 119 North Downs 94 88 Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands 18 120 Wealden Greensand 99 90 Bedfordshire Greensand Ridge 25 121 Low Weald 106 91 Yardley–Whittlewood Ridge 30 122 High Weald 111 95 Northamptonshire Uplands 35 123 Romney Marshes 116 107 Cotswolds 40 124 Pevensey Levels 121 108 Upper Thames Clay Vales 45 125 South Downs 125 109 Midvale Ridge 52 126 South Coast Plain 131 110 Chilterns 56 127 Isle of Wight 137 111 Northern Thames Basin 62 128 South Hampshire Lowlands 142 112 Inner London 73 129 Thames Basin Heaths 146 113 North Kent Plain 76 130 Hampshire Downs 152 114 Thames Basin Lowlands 80 131 New Forest 156 115 Thames Valley 84 132 Salisbury Plain and West Wiltshire Downs 162 116 Berkshire and Marlborough Downs 89 134 Dorset Downs and Cranborne Chase 167 135 Dorset Heaths 172 Acknowledgements The Countryside Agency acknowledges the contribution to this publication of a great many individuals, partners and organisations without which it would not have been possible. -
Biodiversity Action Plan for Hart 2018 – 2023
Biodiversity Action Plan for Hart 2018 – 2023 Contents Introduction………………………………………,,,,,,………………… 3 Purpose of this Action plan………………………………..…………… 4 Biodiversity Achievements 2012-17……………………….….…...…… 5 What is biodiversity and why is it important? …………..…………….. 7 Overview of the biodiversity resource in Hart …………..…...………. 9 Designated sites in Hart…………………………...……..…………… 11 Nature conservation sites managed by HDC………….………..….… 17 Action Plan 2018-23………………………………….…………….…. 19 2 1. Introduction 1.1 The natural environment in Hart has experienced large changes over the past century, in common with most of south eastern England. However, there remains an extremely diverse natural environment in the district, rich in different habitats and species. Hart is characterised by a mosaic of farmland, ancient woodlands, lowland heathlands and water courses. There is also a varied built environment from newer towns such as Fleet and Yateley to rural towns and villages such as Odiham and Hartley Wintney which all contain features which contribute to overall biodiversity resource. 1.2 The publication of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act in 2006 makes biodiversity an important consideration for all local authorities. Section 40 of this act sets out the duty to conserve biodiversity: “Every public authority must, in exercising its functions, have regard, so far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity”. 1.3 The adoption of the first Hart Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) in 2012 helped translate national and regional targets into local action, whilst also highlighting species and areas of local importance. The first Hart BAP was implemented by the Council’s Biodiversity Officer in partnership with other groups such as the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre (HBIC), Hart Countryside Services, Parish Councils, friends of groups and other council departments. -
Setting the Context 11
PART 2: SETTING THE CONTEXT 11. SITE ANALYSIS 11.1 Introduction 142 11.2 Planning context 142 11.3 Site location 144 11.4 Topography, hydrology & geology 148 11.5 Landscape & visual character 152 11.6 Existing landscape features & green infrastructure 154 11.7 Existing movement network 156 11.8 Existing facilities 158 11.9 Historic environment 160 11.10 Existing utilities and infrastructure 161 11.11 Site analysis 163 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Planning context This section outlines the physical site features and issues The extensive planning context for Welborne is set out in members of the public, and a set of high level development that have influenced and shaped the masterplanning and the Planning Statement which accompanies this DAS and principles. Policy CS13 also stipulates that an Area Action design process, primarily within the site’s red line boundary, is submitted as part of this OPA. As such, this section only Plan (subsequently the Welborne Plan) will be produced but with reference to any contextual issues and features seeks to provide an overview of the key planning documents to guide planning permission for between 6,500-7,500 outside of it that have bearing on the design response. which have shaped our proposals in terms of their design dwellings. and access. These include strategic policies, development The topics that are covered in this chapter are as follows: management policies and other material considerations. Fareham Local Plan Part 3: The Welborne Plan (2015) ■ Planning context; The Development Plan This entire part of the Local Plan is focused on the North ■ Site location; The Fareham Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (2011) Fareham SDA, which was subsequently named the Welborne provides the strategic direction for the site and provided ■ Topography, hydrology and geology; Plan. -
England's Light Pollution and Dark Skies
England‘s Light Pollution and Dark Skies Final Report Prepared by LUC May 2016 Project Title: England‘s Light Pollution and ark Skies Client: Campaign to Protect Rural England Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 30.03.16 First draft iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 2.0 13.04.16 Second draft iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 3.0 25.04.16 raft final report iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 4.0 31.05.16 Final Report iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern CPRE Light Pollution Mapping,1).doc. Last saved: 0300602016 12:23 England‘s Light Pollution and Dark Skies Prepared by LUC May 2016 Planning 1 E2A LUC LON ON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England esign 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management N61 17 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T 944 ,0-20 7383 5784 London N61 17 Mapping 1 3isualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100A recycled paper Contents Introduction 2 Creating a National Map 2 Obtaining night light imagery from satellites 2 Selecting a baseline dataset and processing the data 3 The national map 3 3 Headline findings 5 National findings 5 Regional findings 6 4 Detailed analysis 0 County 10 istricts ,including Unitary Authorities, London Boroughs and Metropolitan Boroughs) 11 Protected Landscapes 13 National Character Areas 17 5 Case studies 2 2nvestigating change over time 21 6 Supporting tools and information 24 Potential uses for the updated light pollution maps 24 -
Other Material
272 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB INSECTS IN HAMPSHIRE, 1933 By F. H. HAINES HE summer of 1933, remarkable for drought and the amount of long-continued sunshine and heat, reacted on insects, T especially Lepidoptera, on the whole favourably. Times of appearance were very early, migrants numerous, and species normally single or double-brooded often produced an extra brood. But many, such as dragonflies, were soon over. February was wet, April dry, but June had one very heavy storm here (1.59ms. in 24 hours). The absence of rain was particularly noticeable later in-the year : in August, November and December. Orthoptera (Earwigs, Cockroaches, Crickets and Grass hoppers). The species of Ectobia were abundant and early, as was Nemobius sylvestris F., and grasshoppers : Pholidoptera griseoaptera De G. in the New Forest in August, Metrioptera albopunctata Gz. near Ringwood, M. brachyptera L., Conocephalus dorsalis 'Latr., Meconema thalassinum De G. and Leptophyes punctatissima Bosc. in the Forest. Tetrix subulatus L. was common, and hibernated T. bipunctatus L. was met with here very early. Goytphocerus maculatus Thunb. was everywhere in the wild, dry places around through summer and autumn, its colour, as usual, varying endlessly with that of its surroundings. The large Mecostethus grossus L., not uncommon in the forest bogs, and usually on Linwood Bog, was strangely, conditions being so favourable, not found here this year. Omocestus rufipes Zett. was not nearly so common on the heath as was O. viridulus L. on the grass. It was still abundant, basking in the sun on the woodwork of the house here, and else where, late in October. -
Appendices A
Appendix A Appendix A - Planning Policy - Under Review Propsed Planning Policies A.1 For details of Eastleigh Borough Council Local Plan 2011-2029 proposals, see www.eastleigh.gov.uk/localplan 178 Landscape Character Assessment for Eastleigh Borough Appendix B Appendix B - Green Infrastructure The Green Infrastructure Framework B.1 Theme I: Sustainable economic development, attractive workplaces and desirable tourist destinations Objective 1 Ensure the design of existing and new workplaces leads to diverse and attractive green environments for businesses wishing to relocate, grow or set-up in the PUSH sub-region. Objective 2 Complement the resources of existing visitor destinations, facilitate increased tourism opportunities and enhance the visitor economy. Objective 3 Promote businesses and markets that provide low carbon, multifunctional and cost-effective delivery of Green Infrastructure Themes and Objectives. B.2 Theme II: Maximising biodiversity opportunities, adapting to change and protecting European sites Objective 4 Conserve and enhance existing biodiversity: restoring habitats according to Biodiversity Opportunity Area priorities helping deliver Habitat Action Pans and Species Action Plans in BAP and improving connectivity of habitats at all scales and levels of designation. Objective 5 Contribute to the mitigation of the impacts of growth on European sites using buffer zones, providing alternative recreation destinations and reducing the effects of coastal squeeze by providing new habitat sites. B.3 Theme III: Landscape quality and diversity, distinctive features, cultural heritage and appreciation of sense of place Objective 6 Protect the unique quality, diversity and distinctiveness of the sub-region’s landscape and heritage. Objective 7 Maintain and where necessary improve the identity and character of settlements in urban and rural locations. -
3C: Itchen Valley
3C: ITCHEN VALLEY Valley floor in downland setting between Itchen Abbas and Ovington. Permanent pasture, numerous small woods and scattered individual trees, few hedges. Ovington – Clear chalk streams, oftenValley floor– Lower reaches urban There are numerous historic mills wooded banks. edge, pony paddocks and wooded and bridges – along the Itchen. (from ridge backdrop at Bishopstoke. SDILCA) Cheriton – canalised section of theItchen Valley Country park; sluice as Playing fields with poplar windbreaks Itchen on the left. part of restored water meadows. in Lower Itchen Valley. Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area includes the river valley floor and its sides which make up the visual envelope of the valley. The valley tops are defined approximately where there is a break/slackening in slope angle. The southern boundary is formed at the County/Southampton unitary edge. The upper most reaches of the valley follow three spring fed tributaries/headwaters, which join close to New Arlesford namely the Candover stream to the north, River Arle to the east and Cheriton stream to the south. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Open Downs, Downland Mosaic Large Scale, Downland Mosaic Small Scale, River Valley Floor, Lowland Mosaic Medium Scale, Lowland Mosaic Small Scale, Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated, Settlement. 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: Winchester CC Eastleigh BC Upper Itchen Valley Broom Hill Farmland and Woodland Lower Itchen Valley Upper Itchen Valley Floodplain Lower Itchen Valley Floodplain Eastleigh Airport Itchen Valley Sports Pitches The extent of the valley sides is comparable with the two Itchen valley character areas in the Winchester assessment.