Frustrated Magnetic Planes with Intricate Interaction Pathways in the Mineral Langite Cu $ 4 $(OH) $ 6 $ SO $ 4\Cdot 2$ H $ 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Frustrated Magnetic Planes with Intricate Interaction Pathways in the Mineral Langite Cu $ 4 $(OH) $ 6 $ SO $ 4\Cdot 2$ H $ 2 Frustrated magnetic planes with intricate interaction pathways in the mineral langite Cu4(OH)6SO4 · 2H2O Stefan Lebernegg,1, ∗ Alexander A. Tsirlin,2, 3 Oleg Janson,4 G¨unther J. Redhammer,5 and Helge Rosner1, y 1Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, N¨othnitzerStr. 40, 01187 Dresden, Germany 2National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia 3Experimental Physics VI, Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism, Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany 4Institute of Solid State Physics, Technical University Vienna, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8{10/138, 1040 Vienna, Austria 5Department of Materials Sciences & Physics, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria (Dated: October 3, 2018) Magnetic and crystallographic properties of the mineral langite Cu4(OH)6SO4 ·2H2O are reported. 1 2+ Its layered crystal structure features a peculiar spatial arrangement of spin- 2 Cu ions that arises from a combination of corner- and edge-sharing chains. Experimentally, langite orders antiferromagnetically at TN ' 5:7 K as revealed by magnetization and specific heat measurements. Despite this very low energy scale of the magnetic transition, langite features significantly stronger couplings on the order of 50-70 K. Half of the Cu2+ spins are weakly coupled and saturate around 12 T, where the magnetization reaches 0.5 µB /Cu. These findings are rationalized by density-functional band-structure calculations suggesting a complex interplay of frustrated exchange couplings in the magnetic planes. A simplified model of coupled magnetic sublattices explains the experimental features qualitatively. To start from reliable structural data, the crystal structure of langite in the 100{280 K temperature range has been determined by single-crystal x-ray diffraction, and the hydrogen positions were refined computationally. PACS numbers: 75.50.Ee,75.10.Jm,71.20.Ps,61.50.Ks I. INTRODUCTION of spin chains, those with edge- and corner-sharing ge- ometries, are placed next to each other within one material. Spin systems comprising several magnetic Low-dimensional magnets show unique diversity of sublattices with different dimensionalities and energy crystal structures and associated spin lattices, where a scales may have very unusual low-temperature proper- plethora of quantum phenomena can be observed.1{3 The ties. When two sublattices are weakly coupled, they physics of quantum spin chains has been actively ex- are, to a certain extent, independent, hence two mag- plored in Cu2+ compounds featuring chains of corner- or netic transitions manifesting the ordering within each edge-sharing CuO plaquette units. The corner-sharing 4 of the sublattices could be observed. On the other geometry results in uniform spin chains with a negligi- hand, the ordering within one sublattice will neces- bly small second-neighbor coupling, as in Sr CuO ,4,5 2 3 sarily depend on the other sublattice, because three- AgCuVO 6 and KCuMoO (OH).7 The edge-sharing ge- 4 4 dimensional (3D) long-range order typically involves in- ometry is by far more common. It gives rise to com- teractions between the sublattices. Unusual manifesta- peting nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor cou- tions of quantum order-from-disorder have been observed plings, where the former (J ) is typically ferromagnetic, 1 in Sr Cu O Cl 21{25 featuring interpenetrating square while the latter (J ) is antiferromagnetic. Such J − J 2 3 4 2 2 1 2 lattices with drastically different exchange couplings. In frustrated spin chains develop incommensurate spin cor- CuP O , where spins, arranged on a planar square lat- relations and helical magnetic order,8,9 although few in- 2 6 tice, coexist with uniform spin chains, very strong spin stances of ferromagnetic intrachain spin order are known fluctuations are observed even below the N´eeltemper- as well.10,11 The helical spin arrangement observed in 12 13 ature TN , and the value of TN is unusually low for a simple binary compounds CuCl2 and CuBr2 and in 26 14 quasi-two-dimensional (2D) antiferromagnet. The co- arXiv:1506.08562v3 [cond-mat.str-el] 9 Feb 2017 more complex materials like linarite PbCu(OH) SO , 2 4 existence of corner- and edge-sharing Cu2+ chains could all being frustrated J − J spin chains, may trigger elec- 1 2 be even more interesting because of the different nature tric polarization induced by the magnetic order, thus of spin correlations, which are expected to be antiferro- leading to multiferroic behavior.15{17 Additionally, small magnetic collinear and helical, for the corner- and edge- interactions beyond the isotropic Heisenberg model lead sharing chains, respectively. to an intricate magnetic phase diagram, including mul- tipolar (three-magnon) phases, which has been studied The respective magnetic ground state of these com- 18 recently. However, the complex interplay of frustration pounds depends very subtly on the interplay of vari- and anisotropy needs further investigations on different ous exchange integrals, including possible frustration and 19,20 systems as, e.g., LiCuVO4. strong quantum fluctuations. In particular, in edge- One may naturally ask what happens when two types sharing geometries (with Cu{O{Cu bond angles near 2 90◦) the leading exchange integrals and, thus, the actual II. METHODS magnetic model are often difficult to establish due to a pronounced dependency of the exchange on the struc- All experiments have been performed on a natural sam- tural details: Small changes of bond angles or minor ple (Fig.1) of langite from the Podlipa and Reinera mine, changes of the local Cu{O environment, e.g. by attached Lubietova, Slovakia. The sample quality was first thor- 27,28 H-atoms, may even swap the ground state qualita- oughly controlled by laboratory powder X-ray diffraction tively. Owing to the high complexity of the structure- (XRD) (Huber G670 Guinier camera, CuKα 1 radiation, properties relation in these compounds, the combination ImagePlate detector, 2θ = 3 − 100◦ angle range). of experimental investigations with theoretical methods Single-crystal X-ray diffraction between 100 and 280 K appeared to be very successful to disentangle the com- was performed on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD- plicated interplay. In particular, in recent years den- diffractometer equipped with a Cryosteam liquid nitro- sity functional calculations have developed to a valuable gen low-temperature device. A single crystal, selected on tool, establishing accurate magnetic models on micro- 13,29,30 the basis of its optical properties (sharp extinctions, reg- scopic grounds, even for involved geometries like ular shape and homogeneity in color) was glued on top of coupled edge-sharing chains or various magnetic sublat- a glass capillary (0.1 mm). Intensity data were collected tices in a single compound. with graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (50 kV, 30 mA). The crystal-to-detector distance was 40 mm and The coexistence of the edge- and corner-sharing the detector was positioned at −28◦ 2Θ using an !-scan geometries is rather common for Cu2+ minerals. In mode strategy at four different '-positions (0◦, 90◦, 180◦ antlerite31 and szenicsite,32 one edge-sharing chain and 270◦). 630 frames with ∆! = 0.3◦ were acquired for is encompassed by two corner-sharing chains that each run. The 3D data were integrated and corrected together form a three-leg spin ladder. The edge- for Lorentz polarization and background effects using and corner-sharing chains can also form infinite the APEX2 software (Bruker { Nonius, 2004). Struc- layers, as in deloryite Cu (UO )(MoO ) (OH) ,33 4 2 4 2 6 ture solution (using Patterson methods) and subsequent derriksite Cu (UO )(SeO ) (OH) ,34 niedermayrite 4 2 3 2 6 weighted full-matrix least-square refinements on F 2 were Cu Cd(SO ) (OH) ,35 and langite Cu (OH) SO ·2H O. 4 4 2 6 4 6 4 2 done with SHELXL-9738 as implemented in the program The crystal structure of the latter mineral is shown in suite WinGX 1.64.39 Fig.1. Layers of alternating edge- and corner-sharing All further experiments were performed on a powder chains (Fig.1, right) are well separated by SO 4 sulphate groups and water molecules. A somewhat similar sample since the natural crystals are very small and frag- structure without water molecules has been reported ile as well as strongly intergrown, preventing us from col- 36,37 lecting a sufficient amount of single crystallites for mag- for the mineral brochantite Cu4(OH)6SO4 that, however, features a much smaller interlayer separation, netic and specific heat measurements. Magnetization hence substantial interlayer couplings can be expected. measurements were done on a Quantum Design (QD) In this paper, we focus on the magnetism of langite, SQUID MPMS in magnetic fields up to 5 T and using the where individual structural planes should be very weakly vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) setup of Quan- coupled magnetically and sufficiently pure natural tum Design PPMS up to 14 T in the temperature range samples of this mineral are available. of 1.6{300 K. Heat capacity data were acquired with the QD PPMS in fields up to 14 T. We also show that, in contrast to our expectations, in- Electronic structure calculations within density func- dividual structural chains in this material cannot be con- tional theory (DFT) were performed with the full- 40 sidered as weakly coupled magnetic chains. On the other potential local-orbital code FPLO9.07-41 on the 100 K hand, two sublattices formed by the structural chains of crystal structure in combination with the local density 41 either type, can be distinguished in the overall very in- approximation (LDA), generalized gradient approxi- 42 43,44 tricate spin lattice. These sublattices reveal drastically mation (GGA) and the DFT+U method. A 4×4×4 different magnetic couplings and facilitate the description k-mesh was employed for LDA and GGA runs while su- of the complex low-temperature magnetism on a qualita- per cells used for DFT+U calculations were computed tive microscopic level.
Recommended publications
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry of Formation of Lanarkite, Pb2oso 4
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, DECEMBER 1982, VOL. 46, PP. 499-501 Chemistry of formation of lanarkite, Pb2OSO 4 W E have recently reported (Humphreys et al., 1980; sion which is at odds with the widespread occur- Abdul-Samad et al., 1982) the free energies of rence of the simple sulphate and the extreme rarity formation of a variety of chloride-bearing minerals of the basic salt, and with aqueous synthetic of Pb(II) and Cu(II) together with carbonate procedures for the preparation of the compound and sulphate species of the same metals includ- (Bode and Voss, 1959), which involve reaction of ing leadhillite, Pb,SO4(COa)2(OH)2, caledonite, angtesite in basic solution. PbsCu2CO3(SO4)3(OH)6, and linarite, (Pb,Cu)2 Kellog and Basu (1960) also determined AG~ for SO4(OH)2. By using suitable phase diagrams it has Pb2OSOa(s) at 298.16 K using the method of proved possible to reconstruct, in part, the chemical univariant equilibria in the system Pb-S-O. They history of the development of some complex obtained a value of -1016.4 kJ mol-1 based on secondary mineral assemblages such as those at literature values for PbO(s), PbS(s), PbSO4(s), and the Mammoth-St. Anthony mine, Tiger, Arizona, SO2(g) and another of - 1019.8 kJ mol- 1 based on and the halide and carbonate suite of the Mendip adjusted values for the above compounds. These Hills, Somerset. two results, for which the error was estimated to A celebrated locality for the three sulphate- be about 4.5 kJ mol-1, seem to be considerably bearing minerals above is the Leadhills-Wanlock- more compatible with observed associations than head district of Scotland (Wilson, 1921; Heddle, the earlier values.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrowoodwardite Cu2al2(SO4)(OH)8 • Nh2o. C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Hydrowoodwardite Cu2Al2(SO4)(OH)8 • nH2O. c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 32/m (probable). As porous botryoidal crusts and small stalactitic aggregates. Physical Properties: Fracture: Uneven. Tenacity: Brittle upon partial dehydation. Hardness = n.d. D(meas.) = 2.33(8) D(calc.) = 2.48 Slowly and reversibly dehydrates to woodwardite. Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Blue to pale blue. Streak: Pale blue. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: [Uniaxial.] n = 1.549(5)–1.565(5) ω = n.d. = n.d. Cell Data: Space Group: R3m (probable). a = 3.070(7) c = 31.9(2) Z = 3 X-ray Powder Pattern: St. Briccius mine, Germany. 10.5 (100), 5.26 (17), 3.50 (6), 2.60 (5b), 1.524 (4b), 2.46 (2b), 2.23 (2b) Chemistry: (1) SO3 15.50 SiO2 5.60 Al2O3 19.20 CuO 28.39 ZnO 0.41 Na2O 0.10 H2O 30.10 Total [99.30] (1) St. Briccius mine, Germany; by ICP-MS, SiO2 from admixed amorphous silica, H2Oby 2− 1− TGA, (SO4) , (OH) and H2O confirmed by IR, original total given as 99.3%; corresponds to • (Cu1.92Zn0.04)Σ=1.96Al2.04(SO4)1.04(OH)7.96 5.08H2O. (2) St. Christoph mine, Germany; analysis 2− not given, (CO3) from stoichiometry and presence confirmed by IR; then stated to correspond • to (Cu1.96Zn0.04)Σ=2.00(UO2)0.04Al2.00[(SO4)0.64(CO3)0.36]Σ=1.00(OH)8 nH2O. Occurrence: Rare in the oxidized portions of base metal sulfide mines. Association: Woodwardite, schulenbergite, namuwite, brianyoungite, langite, linarite, allophane, amorphous silica.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsbeckite (Cu, Zn)15(SO4)4(OH)22 • 6H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic, Pseudohexagonal
    Ramsbeckite (Cu, Zn)15(SO4)4(OH)22 • 6H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic, pseudohexagonal. Point Group: 2/m. Crystals are tabular with large {001}, also {210}, {110}, {100}, giving a slightly rounded rhombic outline, to 3 mm. Twinning: Observed, repeated, forming cylindrical aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {001}, perfect. Fracture: Conchoidal. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3.5 D(meas.) = 3.39–3.41 D(calc.) = 3.37 Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Green, blue-green. Streak: Pale green. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Pleochroism: Weak; X = pale blue-green, emerald-green; Y = Z = blue-green, yellow-green. Orientation: Y = b; X ∧ c =5◦; Z ∧ a =5◦. Absorption: X > Y = Z. α = 1.624–1.669 β = 1.674–1.703 γ = 1.678–1.707 2V(meas.) = 36◦–38◦ 2V(calc.) = 38.0◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/a. a = 16.088–16.110 b = 15.576–15.602 c = 7.102–7.112 β =90.0◦−90.27◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Bastenberg mine, Ramsbeck, Germany. 7.090 (100), 3.549 (25), 1.776 (20), 3.254 (13), 4.400 (12), 3.232 (12), 3.244 (11) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) SO3 17.4 17.6 17.51 CuO 44.5 43.8 43.49 ZnO 15.8 18.1 22.25 H2O 19.3 [20.5] 16.75 Total 97.0 [100.0] 100.00 (1) Bastenberg mine, Ramsbeck, Germany; SO4 by photometry, CuO, ZnO by AA, H2O by gas 1− chromatography, (OH) computed for charge balance; corresponds to (Cu10.30Zn3.58)Σ=13.88 • (SO4)4.00(OH)19.76 9.84H2O.
    [Show full text]
  • Alteration - Porphyries
    ALTERATION - PORPHYRIES Occurs with minor mineralization in the deeper Potassic parts of some porphyry systems, and is a host to mineralization in porphyry deposits associated with alkaline intrusions © Copyright Spectral International Inc. Sodic, sodic-calcic Propylitic Potassic alteration shows Actinolite, biotite, phlogopite, epidote, iron- chlorite, Mg-chlorite, muscovite, quartz, anhydrite, magnetite. Albite, actinolite, diopside, quartz, Fe-chlorite, Mg-chlorite, epidote, actinolite, magnetite, titanite, chlorite, epidote, calcite, illite, montmorillonite, albite, pyrite. scapolite Intermediate argillic alteration generally This is an intense alteration phase, often in the Copyright Spectral International Inc.© forms a structurally controlled to upper part of porphyry systems. It can also form envelopes around pyrite-rich veins that Phyllic alteration commonly forms a widespread overprint on other types of cross cut other alteration types. peripheral halo around the core of alteration in many porphyry systems porphyry deposits. It may overprint earlier potassic alteration and may host substantial mineralization ADVANCED ARGILLIC Phyllic INTERMEDIATE ARGILLIC The minerals associated with this type The detectable minerals include are higher temperature and include illite, muscovite, dickite, kaolinite, pyrophyllite, quartz, andalusite, Fe-chlorite, Mg-chlorite, epidote, diaspore, corundum, alunite, topaz, montmorillonite, calcite, and pyrite tourmaline, dumortierite, pyrite, and hematite EXOTIC COPPER www.e-sga.org/ CU PHOSPHATES Cu Cu CARBONATES CHLORIDES Azurite, malachite, aurichalcite, rosasite Atacamite, connellite, and cumengite © Copyright Spectral International Inc. Cu-ARSENATES EXOTIC COPPER Cu-SILICATES Cu-SULFATES bayldonite, antlerite, chenevixite chrysocolla dioptase brochantite, conichalcite chalcanthite clinoclase papagoite shattuckite cyanotrichite olivenite kroehnite, spangolite © Copyright Spectral International Inc. © Copyright Spectral International Inc. LEACH CAP MINERALS .
    [Show full text]
  • Wroewolfeite Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 • 2H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic
    Wroewolfeite Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 • 2H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: m. Lathlike crystals, to 1 mm. Twinning: By reflection on {001} and {100}, yielding fourlings. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on {010}, {100}, {001}. Hardness = ∼2.5 D(meas.) = 3.27(1) D(calc.) = 3.30 Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Dark greenish blue; blue in transmitted light. Streak: Pale blue. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Pleochroism: Strong; X = pale blue; Y = deep greenish blue; Z = greenish blue. Absorption: Y Z > X. α = 1.637(2) β = 1.682(2) γ = 1.694(2) 2V(meas.) = 53◦ Cell Data: Space Group: Pm. a = 6.045(1) b = 5.646(1) c = 14.337(6) β =93.39(1)◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Loudville mine, Massachusetts, USA. 7.152 (100), 3.581 (70), 2.628 (35), 2.004 (30), 2.431 (20), 2.379 (20), 2.278 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) SO3 16.48 16.40 CuO 64.22 65.16 H2O [19.30] 18.44 Total [100.00] 100.00 (1) Loudville mine, Massachusetts, USA; by electron microprobe, H2O by difference; 1− with (OH) calculated for charge balance and H2O adjusted for best agreement between • measured and calculated densities, then corresponds to Cu3.94(SO4)1.00(OH)5.88 2.11H2O. • (2) Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 2H2O. Polymorphism & Series: Dimorphous with langite. Occurrence: An uncommon secondary mineral in the oxidation zone of copper-bearing hydrothermal mineral deposits; may be post-mine or formed in dumps and in slags. Association: Langite, posnjakite, serpierite, brochantite, linarite, malachite, chalcocite, covellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Russell Society, Vol 4 No 2
    JOURNAL OF THE RUSSELL SOCIETY The journal of British Isles topographical mineralogy EDITOR: George Ryba.:k. 42 Bell Road. Sitlingbourn.:. Kent ME 10 4EB. L.K. JOURNAL MANAGER: Rex Cook. '13 Halifax Road . Nelson, Lancashire BB9 OEQ , U.K. EDITORrAL BOARD: F.B. Atkins. Oxford, U. K. R.J. King, Tewkesbury. U.K. R.E. Bevins. Cardiff, U. K. A. Livingstone, Edinburgh, U.K. R.S.W. Brai thwaite. Manchester. U.K. I.R. Plimer, Parkvill.:. Australia T.F. Bridges. Ovington. U.K. R.E. Starkey, Brom,grove, U.K S.c. Chamberlain. Syracuse. U. S.A. R.F. Symes. London, U.K. N.J. Forley. Keyworth. U.K. P.A. Williams. Kingswood. Australia R.A. Howie. Matlock. U.K. B. Young. Newcastle, U.K. Aims and Scope: The lournal publishes articles and reviews by both amateur and profe,sional mineralogists dealing with all a,pecI, of mineralogy. Contributions concerning the topographical mineralogy of the British Isles arc particularly welcome. Not~s for contributors can be found at the back of the Journal. Subscription rates: The Journal is free to members of the Russell Society. Subsc ription rates for two issues tiS. Enquiries should be made to the Journal Manager at the above address. Back copies of the Journal may also be ordered through the Journal Ma nager. Advertising: Details of advertising rates may be obtained from the Journal Manager. Published by The Russell Society. Registered charity No. 803308. Copyright The Russell Society 1993 . ISSN 0263 7839 FRONT COVER: Strontianite, Strontian mines, Highland Region, Scotland. 100 mm x 55 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Antlerite Cu3(SO4)(OH)4 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Antlerite Cu3(SO4)(OH)4 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 2/m 2/m 2/m. Crystals are thick tabular {010}, equant or short prismatic [001], with dominant {110}, another twenty-odd forms, to 2 cm; commonly fibrous and in cross-fiber veinlets, feltlike, granular or powdery lumps and aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {010}, perfect; {100}, poor. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3.5 D(meas.) = 3.88 D(calc.) = 3.93 Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Emerald-green, blackish green, pale green. Streak: Pale green. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Pleochroism: X = yellow-green; Y = blue-green; Z = green. Orientation: X = b; Y = a; Z = c. Dispersion: r< v,very strong. α = 1.726 β = 1.738 γ = 1.789 2V(meas.) = 53◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P nam. a = 8.244(2) b = 11.987(3) c = 6.043(1) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Synthetic. (ICDD 7-407). 4.86 (100), 2.566 (85), 3.60 (75), 2.683 (75), 6.01 (25), 5.40 (25), 2.503 (25) Chemistry: (1) (2) SO3 22.32 22.57 CuO 66.34 67.27 H2O 10.52 10.16 insol. 0.88 Total 100.06 100.00 (1) Chuquicamata, Chile; average of two analyses. (2) Cu3(SO4)(OH)4. Occurrence: Uncommon, typically formed in the oxidized zone of copper deposits under highly acid conditions, especially in arid regions. Association: Brochantite, atacamite, chalcanthite, kr¨ohnkite,natrochalcite, linarite, gypsum. Distribution: In the USA, in Arizona, from the Antler mine, near Yucca Station, Mohave Co., large crystals at several mines in Bisbee, Cochise Co., from the Grandview mine, Grand Canyon, Coconino Co., in Copper Basin, between Skull Valley and Prescott, and at Jerome, Yavapai Co.; from the Blanchard mine, near Bingham, Hansonburg district, Socorro Co., New Mexico; in the Darwin district, Inyo Co., California; from the Northern Light mine, near Black Mountain, Mountain View district, Mineral Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • Posnjakite: ~[Cu4(OH)6(H20)O] Octahedral Sheets in Its Structure
    Zeitschrift fUr Kristallographie 149, 249~257 (1979) ([I by Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft 1979 Posnjakite: ~[Cu4(OH)6(H20)O] octahedral sheets in its structure M. Mellini and S. Merlino Istituto di Mineralogia e Petrografia and C.N.R., Centro di Studio per la Geologia StrutturaIe e Dinamica dell' Appennino, Pisa, Italy Received: November 27, 1978 Abstract. The crystal structure of posnjakite '(space group Pa, a = 10.578, b = 6.345, c = 7.863 A, {3= 117.98°) was determined by direct methods and refined to a final R value of 0.05. The structure is characterized by corrugated sheets of distorted copper octahedra with crystal chemical formula ~[CuiOHMH20)O). Sulphate groups are connected to one side of the octahedral sheet by corner sharing. The resultant composite octahedral- tetrahedral layers are connected to each other by hydrogen bonds. The crystal chemical formula ofposnjakite is CU4(S04)(OH)6' H20 with two such units in the unit cell. The relations ofposnjakite with other copper sulphate hydrates are noted and discussed. Introduction Posnjakite was first found in an ore quartz vein of the Nura-Taldinsk tungsten deposit in central Kazachstan by Komkov and Nefedov (1967) who, on the basis of microchemical tests and the supposed paramorphism of the mineral after langite, proposed the chemical formula CU4(S04)(OH)6 . H20; they determined the following unit cell parameters: a = 9.80(5),b = 6.32(5), c = 7.85(5) A, {3= 107(1)° (space group not stated). Posnjakite in association with langite was also found at Borovec (Czechoslovakia) and studied by Miskovsky (1975), who also synthesized it, and by Sekanina (1975) who, on the basis of careful goniometric measures, asserted "that (1) posnjakite crystals are limited by their own faces and they are not paramorphs after langite, (2) that they are tabular on (lOl) and (3) that (231) ist the twin plane".
    [Show full text]
  • And Associated Lead Fluoride Minerals from the Grand Reef Mine, Graham County, Arizona
    CALCIOARAVAIPAITE A NEW MINERAL 1'.01411II1 ••••• AND ASSOCIATED LEAD FLUORIDE MINERALS FROM THE GRAND REEF MINE, GRAHAM COUNTY, ARIZONA Anthony R. Kampf Mineralogy Section Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 900 Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90007 Eugene E. Foord United States Geological Survey Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, MS 905 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 The Grand Ree] mine in southeastern Arizona, best known to collectors for superb crystals of linarite, is also the type locality for a unique suite of lead fluoride minerals. Crandreeiite, pseudograndretiflte, laurelite, aravaipaite, and artroeite have been found nowhere else; added to this group is calcioaravaipaite, described here for the first time. INTRODUCTION The Grand Reef mine is situated in Laurel Canyon, about 6 km In 1969 a bench was blasted near the top of the reef just south of northeast of Klondyke, in the Aravaipa mining district of Graham a vertical stope known as the "glory hole." Most of the mine's well- County, Arizona. Jones (1980) provided an overview of the history, crystallized oxidized minerals, predominantly sulfates, have been geology and mineralogy of the deposit. The mineralogy was recovered from this area. The fine linarite crystals up to 5 em in treated in greater detail in a thesis by Besse (1981). The mine length for which the mine. is most famous were found here. This is exploits a small epithermallead-copper-silver deposit hosted by a also the source of six new lead fluoride minerals (Table I). The first silicified breccia. The breccia is highly resistant to weathering and four, grandreefite, pseudograndreefite, laurelite and aravaipaite, forms a precipitous cliff known as the "reef," from which the name were discovered on a single specimen (LACMNH 25414) recov- of the mine is derived.
    [Show full text]