DOCSLIB.ORG

Resolution and Severity in Decompression Illness. Aviat Space and Type 2 DCS Environ Med 2009; 80: 466 – 71

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resolution and Severity in Decompression Illness. Aviat Space and Type 2 DCS Environ Med 2009; 80: 466 – 71 REVIEW ARTICLE Resolution and Severity in Decompression Illness Richard D. Vann , Petar J. Denoble , Laurens E. Howle , Paul W. Weber , John J. Freiberger , and Carl F. Pieper V ANN RD, D ENOBLE PJ, H OWLE LE, W EBER PW, F REIBERGER JJ, P IEPER The Golding Classifi cation for Compressed Air Work: Type 1 CF. Resolution and severity in decompression illness. Aviat Space and Type 2 DCS Environ Med 2009; 80: 466 – 71 . We review the terminology of decompression illness (DCI), investiga- Golding et al. described Type 1 DCS as “ simple bends ” tions of residual symptoms of decompression sickness (DCS), and ap- and Type 2 DCS as serious ( 11 ). They reported 650 Type plication of survival analysis for investigating DCI severity and resolution. The Type 1 and Type 2 DCS classifi cations were introduced in 1960 for 1 cases and 35 Type 2 cases, both requiring recompres- compressed air workers and adapted for diving and altitude exposure sion therapy. In addition, many other cases, described as with modifi cations based on clinical judgment concerning severity and “ niggles, ” involved minor untreated pain considered therapy. In practice, these proved ambiguous, leading to recommenda- too nonspecifi c for study. tions that manifestations, not cases, be classifi ed. A subsequent approach assigned individual scores to manifestations and correlated total case Type 1 DCS was defi ned as pain, usually in or around scores with the presence of residual symptoms after therapy. The next a joint, with a mean onset of 3 h (0 – 12 h range) after step used logistic regression to fi nd the statistical association of manifes- reaching atmospheric pressure. Half the Type 1 cases re- tations to residual symptoms at a single point in time. Survival analysis, sponded to recompression quickly at 2 – 3 psi (0.14 – 0.2 a common statistical method in clinical trials and longitudinal epidemi- ological studies, is a logical extension of logistic regression. The method atm) above the working pressure, and half had to be applies to a continuum of resolution times, allows for time varying infor- kept at therapeutic pressure for up to 1 h before pain mation, can manage cases lost to follow-up (censored), and has poten- was relieved. About 25% had residual soreness after tial for investigating questions such as optimal therapy and DCI severity. treatment — a soreness that was reported as markedly There are operational implications as well. Appropriate defi nitions of mild and serious manifestations are essential for computing probabilistic different from bends pain. Men with Type 1 DCS went decompression procedures where severity determines the DCS probabil- back to work the next day unless, as in a few cases, treat- ity that is acceptable. Application of survival analysis to DCI data would ment had been unusually long. require more specifi c case information than is commonly recorded. Type 2 DCS was defi ned as symptoms other than pain, Keywords: decompression illness , DCI , decompression sickness , DCS , arterial gas embolism , AGE , survival analysis . or physical signs that included vertigo, shock, visual ab- normalities, paralysis, speech defects, seizures, or un- consciousness. The onset of Type 2 cases was rapid, with HERAPY FOR DECOMPRESSION illness is judged a mean of 50 min after reaching atmospheric pressure T successful if the manifestations resolve or if particu- and time of symptom onset ranging from during de- larly serious manifestations improve substantially. Time compression to 6 h after decompression. Type 2 cases to resolution is a measure of this success, but manifesta- were treated by immediate recompression followed by tions do not always resolve simultaneously, and the rela- slower decompression to surface pressure than for Type tionship of resolution time to severity has been diffi cult to 1 cases. Workers with Type 2 DCS were forbidden future investigate. Modern history of the fi eld dates from Gold- compressed air work or were allowed only limited ex- ing, who introduced the diagnostic classifi cations Type 1 posures thereafter. Upon radiological examination, two (mild) and Type 2 (serious) decompression sickness (DCS) Type 2 cases were found to have pulmonary cysts that for treating compressed air workers ( 11 ). The Golding ter- were the suspected cause of injury as a result of arterial minology was adopted for both diving ( 3,14,25 ) and aero- gas embolism (AGE). space ( 21,33,34 ). As discussed in detail below, more quantitative methods measured severity by manifesta- tion scores and associated these scores with residual symptoms at a point in time after therapy ( 1,5,7,12,19,24 ). From the Divers Alert Network, Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke Logistic regression attempted to fi nd statistical associa- University Medical Center; the Department of Mechanical Engineer- tions between manifestations and residual symptoms at a ing and Materials Science; and the Center for Aging Division of Biosta- particular time ( 2,13 ). Our review is similar to that of tistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC. This manuscript was received for review in November 2008 . It was Mitchell et al. ( 17 ), but designed to show a progression of accepted for publication in February 2009 . the fi eld toward survival analysis. Survival analysis is a Address reprint requests to: Richard Vann, Ph.D., Center for Hyper- statistical method that could be used for investigating the baric Medicine and Environmental Physiology, Box 3823 DUMC, Dur- continuum of resolution times, the effects of therapeutic ham, NC 27710; [email protected] . Reprint & Copyright © by Aerospace Medical Association, interventions, the infl uence of demographic factors, and Alexandria, VA. differences between manifestations ( 15 ). DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2471.2009 466 Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine x Vol. 80, No. 5, Section I x May 2009 RESOLUTION & SEVERITY IN DCI — VANN ET AL. Application of the Golding Classifi cation to Diving Type 1 DCS to include “ symptoms involving joint pain, Golding’s classifi cations were widely adopted for de- peripheral nervous system, or simple skin bends. ” Type scribing DCS after diving. In 1969, Kidd and Elliott de- 2 DCS was defi ned as “ symptoms involving the central fi ned Type 1 DCS as joint pain, cutaneous or lymphatic nervous system, cardiovascular system, or pulmonary involvement, and fatigue ( 14 ). Type 2 DCS manifesta- system ” ( 21 ). tions were pulmonary, neurological, or cardiovascular. Decompression Illness and Decompression Injury (DCI) Pulmonary signs included respiratory diffi culty ( “ chokes ” ), substernal burning pain, and coughing. Neurological Discomfort with the Golding classifi cation emerged signs and symptoms included cerebral and the more in 1989 at the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine common spinal manifestations. Type 2 symptoms were Society Workshop, Describing Decompression Illness, also defi ned as subjective paresthesias such as “ woolly, ” where the categories AGE, Type 1 DCS, and Type 2 DCS “ cold, ” or “ pins and needles ” sensations. These were of- were declared artifi cial, misleading, and diagnostically ten present in isolated patches on any limb rather than inconsistent ( 10 , pp. 4, 110). Moreover, it was argued, as the more typical segmental distribution of spinal in- clinical symptoms cannot identify the pathological pro- volvement due to trauma. Treatment regimens for Types cesses consistent with AGE, Type 1 DCS, and Type 2 1 and 2 DCS were different, but no difference was indi- DCS, so a pathogenic classifi cation was of little help in cated between AGE and Type 2 therapy. choosing therapy where recompression was the treat- The Type 1/Type 2 terminology began to appear in ment of choice in any event ( 10 , pp. 46, 110). Rather than U.S. Navy literature as early as 1971 in a review of DCS classify cases as AGE, Type 1 DCS, and Type 2 DCS, the cases occurring under pressure ( 25 ), although it appears workshop proposed to classify all manifestations, to have been used informally among submarine medical whether DCS or AGE, under the general designation offi cers as early as 1966. Flynn and Catron included the “ decompression illness ” ( 10 , pg. 110). terminology in lesson plans for a 1975 course on the rec- Dutka participated in the DCI Workshop and agreed ognition and treatment of diving casualties ( 9 ). By 1993 that it was more appropriate to classify manifestations (if not before), it had reached the U.S. Navy Diving rather than to classify cases as AGE, Type 1 DCS, and Manual in the statement: “ Because the treatment of Type Type 2 DCS. However, Dutka preferred the term ‘ de- 1 and Type 2 symptoms is different, it is important to compression injury ’ to ‘ decompression illness ’ and of- distinguish between these two types of decompression fered an alternative classifi cation scheme ( 8 ). (Confusion sicknesses ” ( 27 ). Type 1 was to be treated on Table 5 over the terms seems unlikely since both ‘ decompres- while Type 2 DCS or AGE was to be treated on Table 6 or sion illness ’ and ‘ decompression injury ’ include AGE 6A. Pain-only (Type 1) symptoms were described as and DCS and have the same initials.) Both the Dutka mild to excruciating and typically of a dull, aching qual- and Francis ( 10 ) classifi cations included a time compo- ity that could be diffi cult to differentiate from a muscle nent to facilitate communication about active cases. The sprain or bruise. Type 2 symptoms now included numb- work discussed below usually omitted this time compo- ness, tingling, and decreased sensation to touch or par- nent in favor of post hoc analysis regarding presenting esthesias ( “ tingling, ” “ pins and needles, ” or “ electric manifestations and residual symptoms after therapy sensations ” ) as well as muscle weakness or paralysis, was complete. and abnormalities of mental status or motor perfor- mance. Milder symptoms such as paresthesia were in- DCS Severity Scores cluded as Type 2 out of concern that they would progress In the adaptations of the Golding terminology, Type 1 to serious problems such as paralysis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use of Heliox in Treating Decompression Illness
    The Diving Medical Advisory Committee DMAC, Eighth Floor, 52 Grosvenor Gardens, London SW1W 0AU, UK www.dmac-diving.org Tel: +44 (0) 20 7824 5520 [email protected] The Use of Heliox in Treating Decompression Illness DMAC 23 Rev. 1 – June 2014 Supersedes DMAC 23, which is now withdrawn There are many ways of treating decompression illness (DCI) at increased pressure. In the past 20 years, much has been published on the use of oxygen and helium/oxygen mixtures at different depths. There is, however, a paucity of carefully designed scientific studies. Most information is available from mathematical models, animal experiments and case reports. During a therapeutic compression, the use of a different inert gas from that breathed during the dive may facilitate bubble resolution. Gas diffusivity and solubility in blood and tissue is expected to play a complex role in bubble growth and shrinkage. Mathematical models, supported by some animal studies, suggest that breathing a heliox gas mixture during recompression could be beneficial for nitrogen elimination after air dives. In humans, diving to 50 msw, with air or nitrox, almost all cases of DCI can be adequately treated at 2.8 bar (18 msw), where 100% oxygen is both safe and effective. Serious neurological and vestibular DCI with only partial improvements during initial compression at 18 msw on oxygen may benefit from further recompression to 30 msw with heliox 50:50 (Comex therapeutic table 30 – CX30). There have been cases successfully treated on 50:50 heliox (CX30), on the US Navy recompression tables with 80:20 and 60:40 heliox (USN treatment table 6A) instead of air and in heliox saturation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysbarism - Barotrauma
    DYSBARISM - BAROTRAUMA Introduction Dysbarism is the term given to medical complications of exposure to gases at higher than normal atmospheric pressure. It includes barotrauma, decompression illness and nitrogen narcosis. Barotrauma occurs as a consequence of excessive expansion or contraction of gas within enclosed body cavities. Barotrauma principally affects the: 1. Lungs (most importantly): Lung barotrauma may result in: ● Gas embolism ● Pneumomediastinum ● Pneumothorax. 2. Eyes 3. Middle / Inner ear 4. Sinuses 5. Teeth / mandible 6. GIT (rarely) Any illness that develops during or post div.ing must be considered to be diving- related until proven otherwise. Any patient with neurological symptoms in particular needs urgent referral to a specialist in hyperbaric medicine. See also separate document on Dysbarism - Decompression Illness (in Environmental folder). Terminology The term dysbarism encompasses: ● Decompression illness And ● Barotrauma And ● Nitrogen narcosis Decompression illness (DCI) includes: 1. Decompression sickness (DCS) (or in lay terms, the “bends”): ● Type I DCS: ♥ Involves the joints or skin only ● Type II DCS: ♥ Involves all other pain, neurological injury, vestibular and pulmonary symptoms. 2. Arterial gas embolism (AGE): ● Due to pulmonary barotrauma releasing air into the circulation. Epidemiology Diving is generally a safe undertaking. Serious decompression incidents occur approximately only in 1 in 10,000 dives. However, because of high participation rates, there are about 200 - 300 cases of significant decompression illness requiring treatment in Australia each year. It is estimated that 10 times this number of divers experience less severe illness after diving. Physics Boyle’s Law: The air pressure at sea level is 1 atmosphere absolute (ATA). Alternative units used for 1 ATA include: ● 101.3 kPa (SI units) ● 1.013 Bar ● 10 meters of sea water (MSW) ● 760 mm of mercury (mm Hg) ● 14.7 pounds per square inch (PSI) For every 10 meters a diver descends in seawater, the pressure increases by 1 ATA.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Decompression Illness/Gas Embolism (All Ages)
    Clinical commissioning policy: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for decompression illness/gas embolism (all ages) For implementation from 1 April 2019 NHS England Reference: 170047P NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations and Information Specialised Commissioning Nursing Trans. & Corp. Ops. Commissioning Strategy Finance Publications Gateway Reference: 07603 Document Purpose Policy Clinical commissioning policy: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for Document Name decompression illness/gas embolism (all ages) Author Specialised Commissioning Team Publication Date 20 July 2018 Target Audience CCG Clinical Leaders, Care Trust CEs, Foundation Trust CEs , Medical Directors, Directors of PH, Directors of Nursing, NHS England Regional Directors, NHS England Directors of Commissioning Operations, Directors of Finance, NHS Trust CEs Additional Circulation #VALUE! List Description Routinely Commissioned - NHS England will routinely commission this specialised treatment in accordance with the criteria described in this policy. Cross Reference 0 Superseded Docs 0 (if applicable) Action Required 0 Timing / Deadlines By 00 January 1900 (if applicable) Contact Details for [email protected] further information 0 0 0 0 0 0 Document Status This is a controlled document. Whilst this document may be printed, the electronic version posted on the intranet is the controlled copy. Any printed copies of this document are not controlled. As a controlled document, this document should not be saved onto local or network drives but should always be accessed from the intranet. 2 For implementation from 1 April 2019 Standard Operating Procedure: Clinical Commissioning Policy: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for decompression illness/gas embolism (all ages) First published: July 2018 Prepared by NHS England Specialised Services Clinical Reference Group for Hyperbaric oxygen therapy Published by NHS England, in electronic format only.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Treatment of Decompression Sickness with Short, No-Air-Break Tables: Review of 140 Cases
    REVIEW ARTICLE Delayed Treatment of Decompression Sickness with Short, No-Air-Break Tables: Review of 140 Cases Paul Cianci and John B. Slade,Jr. CIANCI P, SLADE JR JB. Delayed treatment of decompression sick- increasing frequency, often having dived very provoc- ness with short, no-air-break tables: review of 140 cases. Aviat Space ative profiles, many suffering from severe DCS, and Environ Med 2006; 77:1003–8. Introduction: Most cases of decompression sickness (DCS) in the U.S. with long delays to treatment. are treated with hyperbaric oxygen using U.S. Navy Treatment Tables 5 In 1963 and 1964, the Navy Experimental Dive Unit and 6, although detailed analysis shows that those tables were based on received reports of 133 cases of DCS in which the stan- limited data. We reviewed the development of these protocols and offer dard USN tables at the time were used (28). Full relief an alternative treatment table more suitable for monoplace chambers did not result in 24% of initial recompressions. When that has proven effective in the treatment of DCS in patients presenting to our facility. Methods: We reviewed the outcomes for 140 cases of outcomes using USN Tables 3 and 4 were analyzed, a DCS in civilian divers treated with the shorter tables at our facility from 47% incidence of failure of the first treatment was January 1983 through December 2002. Results: Onset of symptoms noted. However, there were no instances of treatment averaged 9.3 h after surfacing. At presentation, 44% of the patients failure when DCS had occurred following rigid USN demonstrated mental aberration.
    [Show full text]
  • Decompression Illness
    Decompression Illness DCI • Decompression illness (DCI) includes DCS and • Diagnosis – generally hx, estimation of AGE likelihood • ~1-10/10,000 dives • Sx depend on location of insult • Higher in cold water, deep; lower in recreational • <24 hrs possible, >24 hrs unlikely, >36 hrs warm water diving (1-4/10k) very unlikely, >48 hrs almost impossible • Traditional/Golding Classification unless altitude change • Type I (MSK, skin, lymph, fatigue) • There is no pathognomonic test for DCI • Type II (neuro, cardio-resp, ENT, shock) • AGE • Tx 100% Surface O2 • Descriptive/Francis Smith Class • • Evolution (spontaneous recovery, static, relapsing) • IVF • Progressive (increasing #, severity of s/sx) • Evacuation considerations • Organ System • Airway, foley, pressurized cabin or as low as • Neuro, cardio-pulm, MSK, skin, lymph, ENT possible • Time of onset (before or after surfacing) • HBOT • Gas burden • Low (conservative within NoD), Med (D Dive), High (violation dive table) • Evidence of barotrauma DCS Pathophysiology • Henry’s Law – amount of inert gas • Inflammatory & thrombogenic absorbed by blood/tissue increased at processes depth • Association with oxidative stress, microparticles • Boyle’s Law P1V1= P2V2 • Bubbles biologically active – form • Bubble effects plasma-protein coat activating WBC, plts, • Intravascular - embolism, vasospasm, fibrin web ischemia, transbolism, venous stasis, • “Thick skin” stabilizes bubble, decreases hemorrhage, blood-bubble interactions, diffusion of inert gas out of bubble mechanical stripping of endothelial
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Unresponsive Decompression Illness Case Bengusu Mirasoglu* and Samil Aktas
    Mirasoglu and Aktas Journal of Intensive Care (2018) 6:77 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0347-z LETTERTOTHEEDITOR Open Access Comments on unresponsive decompression illness case Bengusu Mirasoglu* and Samil Aktas Abstract We have read the case report about a decompression sickness that was unresponsive to hyperbaric oxygen treatment in your journal. Presented case is intriguing; however, we think there are some contradictive issues in the discussion of the case. In this letter, we aim to comment on these issues that may raise further question. Bubble formation plays a very important role for decompression sickness, but proposed mechanism is incorrect as nitrogen does not change state during decompression. Use of terminology for diving-related diseases and comments on properties of helium may cause misunderstandings. Also importance of history of the dive in evaluating an accident should be emphasized. Letter venous bubbles is possible in the presence of PFO (or We read the case report entitled “A case of decompres- right to left shunt); however, this does not change the sion illness not responding to hyperbaric oxygen” with name of the disease [3]. Either by bubble formation in great interest [1]. We totally agree with authors about the arterial system or arterialization from a right to left multidisciplinary approach to decompression sickness. shunt, this condition is not named AGE, it is DCS. On In our opinion, presence of a diving physician, an expert the other hand, AGE is considered a form of barotrauma of diving diseases, in this team is crucial. Otherwise, un- in diving medicine. Barotrauma is totally a different en- fortunate mistakes can be encountered.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article a New Measure of Decompression Sickness in the Rat
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2014, Article ID 123581, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/123581 Research Article A New Measure of Decompression Sickness in the Rat Peter Buzzacott, Aleksandra Mazur, Qiong Wang, Kate Lambrechts, Michael Theron, Jacques Mansourati, and François Guerrero Laboratoire Optimisation des Regulations´ Physiologiques (ORPhy), UFR Sciences et Techniques, UniversitedeBretagneOccidentale,´ 6avenueLeGorgeu,CS93837,29200BrestCedex3,France Correspondence should be addressed to Peter Buzzacott; [email protected] Received 28 February 2014; Revised 1 May 2014; Accepted 2 May 2014; Published 25 May 2014 Academic Editor: Stephen C. Land Copyright © 2014 Peter Buzzacott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In this study we assessed the reliability of a tilting-board grip score as a measure of decompression sickness in rats. In experiments using a hyperbaric compression/decompression protocol, rats were observed for signs of decompression sickness and their grip strength measured on a tilting particle board hinged to a metal frame. Angles at which rats lost grip were converted to gravitational vectors. Decreased mean grip scores following decompression were fitted to a logistic regression model with strain, age, and weight. Decrease in grip score was significantly associated with observed decompression sickness ( = 0.0036). The log odds ratio for decompression sickness = 1.40 (decrease in grip score). In rats with no decrease in mean grip score there was a 50% probability of decompression sickness (pDCS). This increased steadily with decreases in mean grip score.
    [Show full text]
  • Decompression Sickness in Inside Attendants
    SECTION VI 643 CHAPTER 2 DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS IN INSIDE ATTENDANTS PAUL J. SHEFFIELD AND CHRISTY J. PIRONE WHAT IS DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS? Decompression Sickness (DCS) Defined: DCS is an illness that occurs when environmental pressure is reduced sufficiently to cause gases that are dissolved in body tissues to evolve as bubbles. Primarily consisting of nitrogen, the bubbles evolve from solution when the inside attendant surfaces too fast for the body to compensate. Patients do not have the problem because the oxygen they breathe during hyperbaric oxygen treatment elimi- nates the nitrogen from their bodies. Signs and Symptoms of DCS: Bubbles that cause DCS can form in all parts of the body and the anatomic location accounts for the variety of signs and symptoms. (1) DCS can manifest itself from minor to life-threatening symptoms. Minor skin itching or tingling usually passes within 20 to 30 min- utes, and no treatment is necessary, all other forms of DCS are treated in the hyperbaric chamber with immediate compression and hyperbaric oxygen. “Bends pain” seen in about 90% of cases, may appear anywhere in the body, but is more frequent in legs or arms that were exercised during the exposure. Neurologic symptoms involving the brain or spinal cord occur in about 25% of cases, and are manifested by a wide variety of symptoms but mainly by headache, numbness, paralysis of an arm or leg, loss of sensation, vertigo, visu- al distortions or blindness, and extreme fatigue. Chokes is a rare but life-threat- ening respiratory disorder caused by gas emboli in the lungs, and manifested by wheezing, chest pain, or troublesome cough.
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Treatment for Decompression Illness
    Health and Safety Executive Time to treatment for decompression illness Prepared by North Sea Medical Centre for the Health and Safety Executive 2007 RR550 Research Report Health and Safety Executive Time to treatment for decompression illness Dr Werner Stipp North Sea Medical Centre 3 Lowestoft Road Gorleston on Sea Great Yarmouth Norfolk NR 31 6SG Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBO) is the standard and definitive treatment for divers with decompression illness (DCI). There is conflicting evidence in the medical literature on whether DCI is more responsive to early rather than late treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO). The main aim of this study is to investigate the influence of time to treatment with HBO in divers with neurological DCI. Here we show that early HBO treatment in divers with neurological DCI is robustly associated with a better outcome. There is a suggestion in this study that divers with DCI are less responsive if HBO treatment is delayed for 350 minutes or more (or approximately six hours) after surfacing from the incident dive. An interesting observation in this study is that if normobaric oxygen is administered before HBO, it tends to protect divers against delay in treatment with HBO. An additional analysis provides medical evidence that time limits for HBO as specified in the current ACOP1 should remain in place. This study recommends that a time to treatment action plan (TTT action plan), which specifies what to do when a diver develops suspicious DCI symptoms, will help to ensure that divers have prompt HBO treatment. Divers with serious DCI should be given the appropriate level of medical care in a hospital setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Decompression Illness (DCI)
    Decompression Illness (DCI) Scuba diving has become a very popular sport with literally hundreds of thousands of people taking diving vacations. Because most of these divers fly to their destination and return home by air, the relationship between flying and diving must be appreciated. The issue is the risk of developing DCI if a traveler flies too soon after diving. DCI is caused by excess nitrogen coming out of solution in the form of microbubbles in different tissues. This is facilitated by exposure to low barometric pressure (flying) too soon after exposure to high barometric pressure (diving) and could result in bends (joint/muscle pain), or more serious sequelae such as pulmonary chokes, neurological dysfunction, or neurocirculatory collapse. In reality, DCI can occur in any diver (even without postdive flying), particularly if dive table recommendations are not adhered to. (These tables describe proper procedures for resurfacing.) When is it safe to fly after diving? A precise answer is difficult because there are few scientific data on the subject (1). There are, however, some ongoing specific studies at the Hyperbaric Center at Duke University Medical Center. In addition, Divers Alert Network (DAN) has issued the following flying-after- diving guidelines based on the findings of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS) 1991 Conference (2,3,4). 1. Divers making single dives per diving day should have a minimum surface interval of 12 hours before ascending to altitude. This includes going to altitude by aircraft, automobile, or any other means. 2. Divers who make multiple dives per day, or over many days, or dives that require obligated decompression stops should take special precautions and wait for an extended surface interval beyond 12 hours before ascending to altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Recompression and Adjunctive Therapy for Decompression Illness
    Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness Review information Authors Michael H Bennett1, Jan P Lehm2, Simon J Mitchell3, Jason Wasiak4 1Department of Anaesthesia, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia 2Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia 3Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 4Victorian Adult Burns Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Citation example: Bennett MH, Lehm JP, Mitchell SJ, Wasiak J. Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 , Issue 2 . Art. No.: CD005277. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005277.pub2 . Contact person Michael H Bennett Director of Operating Theatres (Anaesthesia) Department of Anaesthesia Prince of Wales Hospital Barker Street Randwick NSW 2031 Australia E-mail: [email protected] Dates Assessed as Up-to-date:5 November 2009 Date of Search: 23 October 2009 Next Stage Expected: 1 November 2012 Protocol First Published: Issue 2 , 2005 Review First Published: Issue 2 , 2007 Last Citation Issue: Issue 2 , 2007 What's new Date Event Description 5 November 2009 Updated We updated the search to October 23rd 2009. No new studies were found. We moved one ongoing study (Francis 2002) to the excluded studies section because the study did not continue and no data was supplied. We have removed one ongoing study from the review as it did not take place (Hink 2005). History Date Event Description 11 March 2008 Amended Converted to new review format. Abstract Background Decompression illness (DCI) is due to bubble formation in the blood or tissues following the breathing of compressed gas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanisms of Decompression Illness Part 1 of a 3-Part Article by - Part 1 Dr
    The Mechanisms of Decompression Illness Part 1 of a 3-part article by - Part 1 Dr. Simon Mitchell Bubbles can form in tissues and blood Few subjects are more central from dissolved gas… to diving medicine than decompression illness, the most The first source is bubble formation important diving medical from nitrogen that has been disorder. We are all taught about dissolved in tissues during the dive. the disorder and its potentially As you have been taught in your most basic training course, during a serious consequences during dive, air is breathed at increased diver training courses but the pressure, and therefore more of the treatment given to the subject by nitrogen molecules from the air can the diver training organisations is dissolve into the blood. Take a few relatively superficial. Recognising moments to study the very simplified its importance, many divers want human circulation diagram (Figure 1) and read the explanatory caption. to know more; those few extra A simple definition…. details that might help them The nitrogen enters the blood in the lung capillary bed (top of diagram), improve their diving practice, Decompression illness is a disorder and after passing through the left make things a little safer, or caused by bubbles forming in body tissues heart, is distributed to the tissues via simply satisfy their curiosity. To or in the blood; in other words, in places the arteries. In the capillary beds of help with all of these, the where they shouldn’t be. These bubbles the head and body, nitrogen leaves following series of three articles cause damage by a variety of the blood and diffuses into tissues.
    [Show full text]