Long-Term Changes to Food Web Structures and Mercury Biomagnification in Three Large, Inland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Long-Term Changes to Food Web Structures and Mercury Biomagnification in Three Large, Inland Long-term changes to food web structures and mercury biomagnification in three large, inland North American lakes By John Poulopoulos A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada January 2013 Copyright © John Poulopoulos, 2013 Abstract Numerous anthropogenic disturbances have occurred in large lakes over recent decades. These may alter concentrations of the biomagnifying contaminant mercury (Hg) in fish, but long-term impacts of disturbances on Hg trophodynamics are poorly understood. Elemental analyses of archived museum ichthyology specimens could be used to study historical, pre-disturbance fish food webs, but there is uncertainty about effects of chemical preservatives on the results of such analyses. In this thesis, long-term preservation effects were studied, and archived fish were used to reconstruct historical food webs and Hg trophodynamic patterns in three large North American lakes, Nipigon, Simcoe and Champlain. After 24 months of formalin/ethanol preservation, fish muscle 15N and 13C had average changes of +0.4 ‰ and -0.9 ‰, respectively. Shifts in mean Hg concentration was +5 % after 12 months. A suite of 26 other elements analyzed over 24 months showed consistent responses to preservation, usually involving an increase in concentration immediately following preservation. In the second phase of the thesis, stable isotope and Hg analyses were performed on archived and modern fish from the study lakes, dating to the 1920s-60s and 2006-7, respectively. Trophic relationships were often relatively stable over time, but stable isotope metrics revealed a decrease in Lake Nipigon 15N range and less pelagic feeding among Lake Simcoe pumpkinseed and yellow perch. In Lake Champlain, the re-introduction of lake trout in recent decades did not have a major effect on overall food web dimensions. Significant Hg biomagnification factors were found in 1920s and 2006-7 Lake Nipigon (which were not statistically distinguishable from each other) and 2006 Lake Champlain. These biomagnification ii factors ranged from 0.09 to 0.17, which is within the range found in other studies globally. Archived fish and government monitoring records indicated that fish Hg concentrations decreased in Lakes Simcoe and Champlain since historical periods, but remained similar or increased in Lake Nipigon. This thesis confirms the utility of archived fish for elemental analyses. It highlights the risks of Hg contamination and food web change that may be faced by remote lakes, and it provides evidence for relatively stable Hg biomagnification rates in large lakes. iii Statement on Co-authorship Chapters 2-4 (manuscripts) were co-authored with my supervisor, Linda M. Campbell, and with T. Kurtis Kyser who directs the Queen’s Facility for Isotope Research. I was primarily responsible for all aspects of the project, including overall study design, field sampling, laboratory sample preparation and analysis, statistical analyses, and writing of manuscripts. Drs. Campbell and Kyser provided guidance and training on these topics through regular meetings, review of my analyses, and comments on manuscripts. iv Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my parents, friends and family, whose support during this project was too great to describe. I was fortunate to have numerous people to help me at Queen’s, including my supervisor, Linda Campbell; my summer assistants, Deirdre Allen and Patrick Mislan; Kurt Kyser and Kerry Klassen in the isotope lab; my supervisory committee members, Peter Hodson, Shelley Arnott, and Tim Johnson; Carolyn Glass, whose project opened the door for my own; Alemayehu Asfaw in the Dept. of Chemistry; and the rest of my lab mates. I also received generous assistance and/or data from colleagues at other institutions, including Ellen Marsden (Univ. of Vermont); Rick Salmon, Albertina van Ogtrop, and Jake La Rose (Ont. Ministry of Natural Resources); Erling Holm (Royal Ontario Museum); Douglas Nelson (Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology); and Richard Langdon (NY State Museum); Emily Awad (Ont. Ministry of Environment); and Neil Kamman (Vermont Dept. of Environmental Conservation). I received funding from the Queen’s University Graduate Dean’s Travel Grant for Doctoral Field Research, Queen’s University Graduate Award, and International Association for Great Lakes Research Scholarship. My research was also funded by an NSERC Discovery research grant, Ontario Early Researcher Award and Queen’s University Chancellor Research Award to Linda Campbell. The Queen’s Facility for Isotope Research is supported by grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Innovation Fund and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. v Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………..… ii Statement on co-authorship…………………………………………………………iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………… v Table of contents…………………………………………………………………… vi List of Tables…………………………………………………………………….… viii List of Figures……………………………………………………………………… ix List of Abbreviations………………………………………………………….…… xi Chapter 1: General introduction……………………..…………………………...…1 1.1: Changes to lake food webs………………………………………….… 1 1.2: Mercury in the environment………………………………………...… 2 1.3: Retrospective chemical tracer analyses……………………………….. 4 1.4: Project outline…………………………………………………….…… 6 1.5: Thesis objectives…………………………………………………….… 8 Chapter 2: Preservation effects on stable isotopes, total and methyl Hg, and 26 other elements in archived fish tissue……….……………………………………... 9 2.1: Abstract…………………………………………………………...…… 9 2.2: Introduction……………………………………………………….…… 10 2.3: Methods……………………………………………………………..… 13 2.4: Results……………………………………………………………….… 20 2.5: Discussion……………………………………………………………... 21 vi Chapter 3: Stable isotope analyses reveal long-term food web changes in large inland lakes of North America……………………………………………………... 48 3.1: Abstract……………………………………………………………...… 48 3.2: Introduction………………………………………………………….… 49 3.3: Methods……………………………………………………………….. 53 3.4: Results……………………………………………………………….… 56 3.5: Discussion…………………………………………………………...… 60 Chapter 4: Historical and modern mercury biomagnification patterns in three large North American lakes..………………………………………………………. 78 4.1: Abstract…………………………………………………….………….. 78 4.2: Introduction…………………………………………….……………… 79 4.3: Methods……………………………………………………………….. 81 4.4: Results…………………………………………………………………. 88 4.5: Discussion…………………………………………………………...… 89 Chapter 5: Conclusion……………………………………………………………....106 5.1: Thesis overview……………………………………………………..… 106 5.2: Preservation effects………………………………………………….… 107 5.3: Hg and food webs of the study lakes………………………………..… 109 5.4: Future directions…………………………………………….………… 112 5.5: Summary of key conclusions…………………………………..……… 115 Literature Cited………………………………………………………………..…… 116 Appendix: Museum records for archived fish…………………………………...… 127 vii List of Tables Chapter 2 Table 1. Sensitivities and limits of detection of elements in ICP-MS and ICP-OES.......................................................................................... 35 Table 2. Means and standard deviations of 15N, 13C, and Hg concentrations through time............................................................. 36 Table 3. Mean concentrations in month 0 (control) and month 24 of elements other than Hg.................................................................... 37 Table 4. Preservation effects on fish muscle stable isotope ratios in other studies.............................................................................................. 38 Chapter 3 Table 1. Fish species abbreviations and common names used throughout paper………………………………………………………………. 71 Table 2. General characteristics of the study lakes. ……………………….. 72 Table 3. Sample sizes and standard length ranges of fish in historical and modern datasets…………………………………………………… 73 Table 4. Summary of stable isotope metrics……………………………….. 74 Chapter 4 Table 1. Fish species abbreviations and common names used throughout paper………………………………………………………………. 98 Table 2. General characteristics of the study lakes………………………… 99 Table 3. Sample sizes and standard length ranges of fish in historical and modern datasets…………………………………………………… 100 Table 4. Summary statistics of lake trout Hg monitoring records that were used…………………………………………………………. 101 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………… 121 Table A1. Records of fish used in thesis………………………………….... 121 Table A2. Records of fish analyzed for stable isotopes, but not used in thesis……………………………………………………….… 123 viii List of Figures Chapter 2 Fig. 1. Stable isotope composition of N and C over time……………….… 39 Fig. 2. Elemental composition (as a percentage) of samples over time…… 40 Fig. 3. Muscle 13C composition as a function of C content………………. 41 Fig. 4 Hg concentrations over 12 months..…………………………………42 Fig. 5. Elements whose concentration increased and then decreased over time……………………………………………………………….... 43 Fig. 6. Elements whose concentration rapidly increased in first month and remained relatively stable.…………………………………............. 44 Fig. 7. Elements whose concentration rapidly decreased in first month…... 45 Fig. 8. Per mille change in mean 15N and 13C during preservation in stable isotope studies………………………………………………………46 Fig. 9. Percent change in mean THg concentrations from control (unpreserved) samples over time…………………………………………………...47 Chapter 3 Fig. 1. Timeline of some key events affecting the fish communities of the study lakes………………………………………………………….
Recommended publications
  • Portland Daily Press: May4, 1899
    PORTLAND DAILY PRESS. ESTABLISHED JUNE 23. 18<i2-VOL. 37. PORTLAND. MAINE. THURSDAY MORNING. MAY 4, 1899. PRICE THREE CENTS. | | and when the new ■ncmmow. The question at Issue now Is whether lynching* at the next session of the legis- rropetty company lature. Mr. Morriss’s bill for comen I shall bo MEJI OUT. this communication meant a reply would DIGESTER BLEW IT. provides HElRIfO t'SDKD. ready to decide upon It FOUR UUIDRED the trial of the accused within live days be the or that then.” given employes May 1st, after arrest and. noon conviction, the Alderman Lam son—“Are the figuring of tho accounts would begin treasure provides for a public hanging you ready to n*e on that data and the reply be due ten days after. A unique provision of the have a new company tosidss the one now act ii that the testimony or the aRsallant's days or a fortnight Inter. The Machin- petitioning to come In here.?” victim may be taken in private by a ists' in Alderman Will Vote on Mr. Junkins—“I am.” Murder of Old Strike in Saco Machine union interpreted it os meaning that Terrible Explosion special commissioner in the presence of Strange a definite reply would be forthcoming the accused while the trial is in progress. Major Sidney W. Thaxter was oalled on and said it seemed to him that the Man in New York. Shops. May 1st, but the agent says this interpre- Benton Pulp Mill. Question Tonight. propo sltlon which was this tation was incorrect. BATH’S APPROPRIATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear PGCB, Our Family Is Very Opposed to a Casino in This Location
    Name: Judy L.. Mason State: PA County: Lancaster ID: 419 RegID: 560 Dear PGCB, our family is very opposed to a casino in this location. It is disrespectful and too close in proximity to the Gettysburg National Military Park. What does this say about us as a people where so many men died and were wounded. Getttysburg more than any national park is known for the turning point of our country and the Civil War itself. Gettysburg is also know around the world. Putting a casino in this location will only cheapen the meaning of this sacred place. It is also a family destination. A casino will also change this, and also hurt the local`s economy . Please consider the other locations, but not Gettysburg. Your decision will decide how everyone looks at our state and nation. We can never get back anything once it is lost. Name: Jo Ann S. Buys State: TX County: Collin County ID: 423 RegID: 565 Gettysburg is a Sacred place. A casino would cheapen it. Please no casino at Gettysburg. As a historic traveler, I can tell you that when I visit these sacred places, I go for the history and I would not visit a casino. I live six hours from the Vicksburg Battlefied in Mississippi, and I have not once on any of my visits went to their casinos. If I want to gamble, I would take a trip to Vegas. Name: Patrick A. Swigart State: UT County: Salt Lake ID: 425 RegID: 568 I am not a local person. So you may take me as very insignificant and unimportant in the narrow picture.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Schools Eligible for School Foundation Allocation for the 2012‐13 School Year
    List of schools eligible for School Foundation Allocation for the 2012‐13 school year Revised March 2014 Ministry of Education Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Item School No. Board Name SFIS No. Facility Name Panel Identification Number 1 Algoma District School Board 39 Alex Muir PS Secondary 00200007 2 Algoma District School Board 78 Anna McCrea PS Elementary 00200008 3 Algoma District School Board 114 Aweres 1 PS Elementary 00200009 4 Algoma District School Board 141 Bay View PS Elementary 00200010 5 Algoma District School Board 174 Ben R McMullin PS Elementary 00200011 6 Algoma District School Board 208 Blind River PS Elementary 00200012 7 Algoma District School Board 271 Arthur Henderson PS Elementary 00200053 8 Algoma District School Board 379 Central Avenue PS Elementary 00200013 9 Algoma District School Board 589 Esten Park Public School Elementary 00200014 10 Algoma District School Board 682 East View PS Elementary 00200015 11 Algoma District School Board 698 Echo Bay Central PS Elementary 00200016 12 Algoma District School Board 764 Etienne Brule PS Elementary 00200017 13 Algoma District School Board 800 Mountain View PS Elementary 00200018 14 Algoma District School Board 848 Francis H Clergue PS Elementary 00200019 15 Algoma District School Board 955 Grandview PS Elementary 00200021 16 Algoma District School Board 969 Greenwood PS Elementary 00200022 17 Algoma District School Board 993 H M Robbins PS Elementary 00200023 18 Algoma District School Board 1151 Iron Bridge PS Elementary 00200024 19 Algoma District School
    [Show full text]
  • List of Schools Eligible for School Foundation Allocation for the 2016‐17 School Year
    List of schools eligible for School Foundation Allocation for the 2016‐17 school year revised September 2018 Ministry of Education Column 1 Column 2 Column3 Column 4 Column5 Column6 Item No. School Identification Board Name SFIS No. Facility Name Panel BSID Number 1AlgomaDistrict School Board 24626 Adult Learning ELSS Secondary 00200006 908010 2AlgomaDistrict School Board 00078 Anna McCrea PS Elementary 00200008 019186 3AlgomaDistrict School Board 00271 Arthur Henderson PS Elementary 00200053 067679 4AlgomaDistrict School Board 00174 Ben R McMullin PS Elementary 00200011 043362 5AlgomaDistrict School Board 00208 Blind River PS Elementary 00200012 054542 6AlgomaDistrict School Board 24624 Central Algoma Elementary School Elementary 00200045 285552 7AlgomaDistrict School Board 05206 Central Algoma SS Secondary 00200045 891347 8AlgomaDistrict School Board 24241 Central Algoma SS (Intermediate) Elementary 00200045 137967 9AlgomaDistrict School Board 00379 Central Avenue PS Elementary 00200013 093548 10 Algoma District School Board 24336 Chapleau Elementary School Elementary 00200005 101214 11 Algoma District School Board 07609 Chapleau Secondary School Secondary 00200005 900869 12 Algoma District School Board 00682 East View PS Elementary 00200015 161276 13 Algoma District School Board 00698 Echo Bay Central PS Elementary 00200016 165042 14 Algoma District School Board 05348 Elliot Lake SS (Sec) Secondary 00200006 908010 15 Algoma District School Board 00589 Esten Park Public School Elementary 00200014 186783 16 Algoma District School Board
    [Show full text]
  • Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, Submerged Cultural Resources Study
    C. PATRICK lABADIE B&WScans cr" 2- [Oa 2.CX) • PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE • • :D-31 • SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE • by C. Patrick Labadie Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers No. 22 Santa Fe, New Mexico 1989 • iii ON MlCROf\lM e • Submerged Cultural Resources Unit Southwest Cultural Resources Center Southwest Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior • iv • PUBLISHED REPORTS OF THE SOUTHWEST CULTURAL RESOURCES CENTER 1. Larry E. Murphy, Editor. Submerged Cultural Resources Survey: Portions of Point Reyes National Seashore and Point Reyes-Farallon Islands National Marine Sanctuary. Submerged Cultural Resources Unit, 1984. 2. Toni Carrell. Submerged Cultural Resources Inventory: Portions of Point Reyes National Seashore and Point Reyes-Farallon Islands National Marine Sanctuary. Submerged Cultural Resources Unit. 1984 3. Edwin C. Bearss. Resource Study: Lyndon B. Johnson and the Hill Country, 1937-1 963. Division of Conservation, 1984. 4. Edwin C. Bearss. Historic Structures Report: Texas White House. Division of Conservation, 1986. 5. Barbara Holmes. Historic Resource Study of the Barataria Unit of Jean lafitte • National Historical Park. Division of History, 1986 . 6. Steven M. Burke and Marlys Bush-Thurber. Southwest Region Headquarters Building, Santa Fe, New Mexico: A Historic Structure Report. Division of Conservation, 1985. 7. Toni Carrell. Submerged Cultural Resources Site Report: NOQUEBAY, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. Submerged Cultural Resources Unit. 1985. 8. Daniel J. Lenihan, Editor. Submerged Cultural Resources Study: Isle Royale National Park. Submerged Cultural Resources Unit, 1987. 9. J. Richard Ambler. Assessment: Navajo National Monument. Division of Anthropology, 1985. 10. John S. Speaker, Joanna Chase, Carol Poplin, Herschel Franks, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyodon Spathula) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) in Canada Paddlefish February 2008 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003 and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk. Sections 37–46 of SARA (http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/the_act/default_e.cfm) spell out both the required content and the process for developing recovery strategies published in this series.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Snowmobile Trail
    H M BRUNET H Deer Park V MM CC G TAYLOR M COUNCIL B Huntington P 17 P Loomis V Ridgeland ISLAND 73 G Whittlesey GROUNDS I H Neva Corners e Eagle CC H AA M I Langlade sh Bluff V U W P C Q V ST. PK. V BB Bryant ti PENINSULA T WW M SS AA STATE W Perkinstown Murat M g G 46 New o BB G S W STATE PARK Johannesburg CC V V I Auburn PARK E Mountain Q V W C M N North I W Z Gilman 64 107 Merrill Ephraim C V V Sand D BB 64 White Bay VVV R. DD E W Porterfield Forest P K Creek 64 Polar Elton Fish Creek Somerset 64 Q Lake A 57 64 Connorsville Cornell Pine H T E KK Jewett O 64 Goodrich M S P PP 180 F 64 K 128 AA E EE River 64 42 S 79 F F K G Medford Z 64 Antigo R Beaver Cylon S W R S Polley 64 F . A New M r Q I P X O a P P WW W SS d B Q C 97 M 41 Q e S FF WW X 64 O FF C Bloomer 124 O O D E Moonlight Richmond Erin 178 64 O FF K Pound Juddville Bay I GG S GG Gad Q Harmony F Bay Corner Emerald 40 Little O X Q Marinette 35 G R. TT D 64 T Black AA EE X A F DD Hamburg G G Z W EE E Boardman SS Glandon MM T Egg Baileys Harbor F F F Houlton ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Maplewood H 63 20 H D 51 Bevent Leopolis U D D N Prescott BB R
    H M BRUNET H Deer Park V MM CC G TAYLOR M COUNCIL B Huntington P 17 Pe Loomis V Ridgeland ISLAND 73 G Whittlesey GROUNDS I H Neva Corners Eagle H sh Bluff CC V AA M I Langlade W P U tigo PENINSULA C T Q V M STATE Perkinstown ST. PK. V BB Bryant 46 WW New SS AA W Murat M G BB G S W STATE PARK Johannesburg CC V V I Auburn PARK E Mountain Q V W C M N North I W Z 64 107 C V V D Gilman Merrill BB 64 Ephraim Bay R. Sand DD White Porterfield VVV 64 E W Elton Fish Creek Somerset Forest P K Creek 64 Q Polar Lake 57 Connorsville Cornell Pine H A KK Jewett O 64 64 Goodrich M T P PP E 180 F 64 K AA E EE River 64 S 42 128 79 F F K G Medford Z 64 Antigo R. Beaver S S S Polley 64 F A Cylon W Q R I P New X O M P P WW W SS B Q C 97 M 41 Q S FF WW X 64 O FF Cedar Bloomer 124 O O D E Moonlight Richmond Erin 178 64 O FF K Pound Juddville Bay I GG S GG Gad Q Harmony F Bay Corner Emerald 40 Little O X Q Marinette 35 G R. TT D 64 T Black AA EE X A F DD Hamburg G G Z W EE E Boardman SS Glandon MM T Egg Baileys Harbor F F F Houlton ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Natural Resource Conditions, Isle Royale National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Assessment of Natural Resource Conditions Isle Royale National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/237 ON THE COVER Left: Lichens on Rock at Davidson Island (Photograph by Dave Mechenich) Top Right: Foggy Morning at Scoville Point (Photograph by Dave Mechenich) Bottom Right: Sunrise on Davidson Island (Photograph by Steve Seiler) Assessment of Natural Resource Conditions Isle Royale National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/237 George J. Kraft David J. Mechenich Christine Mechenich Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 James E. Cook Steven M. Seiler College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Stevens Point, WI 54481 This report was prepared with funding from the National Park Service under Task Agreement J2380085505 of the Great Lakes Northern Forest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit under Cooperative Agreement CA H6000082000 between the National Park Service and the University of Minnesota. September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]