DOCSLIB.ORG

F310-001-000 Stop Workplace Bullying

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F310-001-000 Stop Workplace Bullying Stop Workplace Bullying There is no excuse for workplace abuse! A group of workers may mob against a fellow What is Workplace Bullying? worker on the same power-level. Workplace bullying refers to repeated, A group of employees and supervisor(s) may unreasonable actions of individuals (or a group) mob against a subordinate employee or even directed towards an employee (or a group of another supervisor on the same or different employees), which are intended to intimidate, power-level. degrade, humiliate or undermine, or which create a risk to the health or safety of the employee(s). Bullying behavior creates feelings Five categories of bullying of defenselessness and injustice in the target and Threat to professional status: Belittling someone’s undermines an individual’s right to dignity at work. opinion, public humiliation, professional humiliation, accusation of lack of effort and Who can be a workplace bully? unwanted or invalid criticism. Workplace bullying often involves an abuse or Threat to personal standing: Name calling, misuse of power, but can reach across all levels of insults, teasing, sexual comments, racial, ethnic or power in the workplace. socioeconomic slurs. Abusive supervision: Occurs when supervisors Isolation: Denying development opportunities, engage in the sustained display of abusive behavior withholding training, withholding critical towards staff. information, ignoring attempts at conversation, exclusion or social isolation. Same level or horizontal bullying: Abusive behavior that is displayed towards an individual on the same Destabilization: Failure to give credit when power level, such as coworker-to-coworker conflict. due, assigning meaningless tasks, removing responsibility or assigning tasks beneath Mobbing: The first thought that may come to professional level. mind when you hear the term mobbing is a horde of people with pitchforks and torches. In the Overwork: Excessive monitoring or micro- workplace, mobbing occurs when abusive behaviors managing, undue pressure to produce work, giving stem from a group of individuals targeting one impossible deadlines, unnecessary disruptions and individual across any power-level. For example: work overload. A group of subordinate employees may mob against a supervisor. SSafetHy & HeAalth AsRsessmPent & Research for Prevention Corporate or institutional bullying Musculoskeletal pain explained Sleep and digestive disturbances Increased depression/self-blame Corporate/institutional bullying occurs when bullying is entrenched in an organization and Family tension becomes accepted as part of the workplace culture. High stress, post-traumatic stress disorder It can occur in different ways: Financial problems due to absence or job loss Placing unreasonable expectations on Protecting yourself with safe work practices employees, where failure to meet those expectations means making life unpleasant (or dismissing) anyone who objects. How bullying affects organizations Labeling employees suffering from stress as Each of the individual consequences listed above can “weak” while completely ignoring or denying be very costly for the organization. Costs of bullying potential work-related causes of the stress. generally fall into four categories: Encouraging employees to fabricate complaints 1. Replacing staff members who leave as a result of about colleagues with promises of promotion or being bullied, lost productivity and the cost of threats of discipline. training new employees. Signs of corporate and institutional bullying include: 2. Work effort being redirected away from productivity towards coping with bullying incidents. Failure to meet organizational goals. 3. Costs associated with investigations of ill Increased frequencies of grievances, resignations treatment, potential legal action, and lower quality and requests for transfers. of work due to emotional strain of bullying. Increased absence due to sickness. 4. Cost of vicarious stress effects on bystanders of Increased disciplinary action. bullying in the workplace, such as absenteeism, staff turnover, mental distraction and fear of Factors that increase the risk for interaction with the bully. bullying behavior Bullying vs. Workplace Harassment Significant organizational change, such as major internal restructuring or technological changes. Harassment is a type of illegal discrimination defined as offensive and unwelcome conduct, serious Worker characteristics, including age, gender, race enough to adversely affect the terms and conditions and ethnicity, parental status or inexperience, of a person’s employment, which occurs because of such as being an apprentice or trainee. the person’s protected class. Workplace relationships, which might include inadequate information flow between Protected classes in employment are race/color, organizational levels and lack of employee creed (religion), national origin, sex, marital participation in decisions. status, disability, HIV/AIDS or Hepatitis C status, sexual orientation/gender identity, and honorably Work systems, such as a lack of policies about discharged veteran and military status. behavior, high rate and intensity of work, staff shortages, interpersonal conflict, organizational An example of harassment could be when an constraints, role ambiguity and role conflict. employee tells racist jokes and refers to a particular co-worker or group of co-workers by using racial How bullying affects people slurs, and after a complaint, the employer does nothing to stop the behavior. Another example of Bullying can cause emotional and physical harassment could be a male manager who makes consequences that include: unwelcome sexual suggestions to a female employee Reduced self-esteem and touches her inappropriately. Work withdrawal, sick days Bullying also differs from retaliation, which the bully’s accusations against you (e.g., time occurs after a person makes a complaint of illegal sheets, audit reports, etc.). discrimination, and is then the subject of an adverse employment action or subjected to harassment Other actions: because he or she made the complaint. Expect the bully to deny and perhaps Bullying, on the other hand, is often directed at misconstrue your accusations; have a witness someone a bully feels threatened by. The target often with you during any meetings with the bully; doesn’t even realize when they are being bullied and report the behavior to an appropriate person. because the behavior is covert, through trivial For state employees: contact the Washington criticisms and isolating actions that occur behind State Employee Assistance Program closed doors. While harassment is illegal, bullying in (www.hr.wa.gov/EAP) for guidance on dealing the workplace is not. with the issue. If you believe that you are being harassed or If you are an employer: retaliated against for making a discrimination complaint, you should immediately contact the Create a zero tolerance anti-bullying policy. This Washington State Human Rights Commission policy should be part of the wider commitment (1-800-233-3247, www.hum.wa.gov). to a safe and healthful working environment and should have the full support of top management. Address the bullying behavior IMMEDIATELY What Can Be Done About Bullying? when it is witnessed or reported. At the first sign of conflict check if your company Take complaints seriously and respond has a workplace violence program or a code of promptly. Reassign the bully, if necessary. conduct that addresses psychological intimidation Clarify task expectations for employees, and aggression that is not based on a protected supervisors and managers. Structure the characteristic. It can be useful to talk to the aggressor work environment to incorporate a sense of if you are comfortable with that. The person may autonomy, individual challenge/mastery and deny the aggression, but you have let them know that professional development. you are aware and consider it unprofessional. Or talk with someone you absolutely trust in the workplace Include employees in decision-making processes. that can advise you and advocate for you while Hold awareness campaigns for EVERYONE on keeping your situation confidential. what bullying is. Encourage reporting. What can you do about bullying? Ensure management is engaged with staff they supervise. If you are an employee, regain control: Encourage open door policies. Recognize that you are being bullied. Investigate the extent and nature of the problem. Realize that you are NOT the source of Conduct employee attitude surveys. the problem. Improve management’s ability and sensitivity Recognize that bullying is about control, towards dealing with and responding to conflicts. and therefore has nothing to do with your performance. Establish an independent contact for employees, such as a designated human resources contact Take action: who is trained on conflict management, confidentiality and ethics. Keep a diary detailing the nature of the bullying (e.g., dates, times, places, what was said or done Provide training on respectful communication, and who was present). handling conflict and building strong relationships at work. Obtain copies of harassing/bullying paper trails; hold onto copies of documents that contradict SHARP — Research for Safe Work This document was produced by the Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, a research program within the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries. SHARP’s researchers and scientists partner
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention
    Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention Compiled by: Amanda B. Nickerson, Ph.D. | Director Heather Cosgrove | Graduate Assistant Rebecca E. Ligman, M.S.Ed. | Program and Operations Manager June 2012 The Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention will reduce bullying abuse in schools and in the community by contributing knowledge and providing evidence-based tools to effectively change the language, attitudes, and behaviors of educators, parents, students, and society. Amanda B. Nickerson, Ph.D. | Director Rebecca E. Ligman, M.S.Ed. | Program and Operations Manager Heather Cosgrove | Graduate Assistant Michelle Serwacki | Graduate Assistant Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention Graduate School of Education University at Buffalo, The State University of New York 428 Baldy Hall Buffalo, NY 14260-1000 P: (716) 645-1532 F: (716) 645-6616 [email protected] gse.buffalo.edu/alberticenter We extend our sincere gratitude to the many groups and individuals who gave their time, energy, and valuable input during this needs assessment process. We thank the National Federation for Just Communities of Western New York, Western New York Educational Services Council, and the Western New York School Psychologist Association for allowing us to obtain feedback from their conference participants. Laura Anderson, Ph.D., Janice DeLucia- Waack, Ph.D., Jennifer Livingston, Ph.D., Amy Reynolds, Ph.D., and Michelle Serwacki, B.A., were helpful in facilitating the focus groups at the WNYESC conference. Several directors and associate directors of similar centers also generously gave of their time to be interviewed, including: Kristin Christodulu, Ph.D.; Michael Furlong, Ph.D.; Lynn Gelzheiser, Ed.D.; Linda Kanan, Ph.D.; Betsey Schühle, M.S.; Susan Swearer, Ph.D.; and Frank Vellutino, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kenneth Burke and the Theory of Scapegoating Charles K. Bellinger Words Sometimes Play Important Roles in Human History. I
    Kenneth Burke and the Theory of Scapegoating Charles K. Bellinger Words sometimes play important roles in human history. I think, for example, of Martin Luther’s use of the word grace to shatter Medieval Catholicism, or the use of democracy as a rallying cry for the American colonists in their split with England, or Karl Marx’s vision of the proletariat as a class that would end all classes. More recently, freedom has been used as a mantra by those on the political left and the political right. If a president decides to go war, with the argument that freedom will be spread in the Middle East, then we are reminded once again of the power of words in shaping human actions. This is a notion upon which Kenneth Burke placed great stress as he painted a picture of human beings as word-intoxicated, symbol-using agents whose motives ought to be understood logologically, that is, from the perspective of our use and abuse of words. In the following pages, I will argue that there is a key word that has the potential to make a large impact on human life in the future, the word scapegoat. This word is already in common use, of course, but I suggest that it is something akin to a ticking bomb in that it has untapped potential to change the way human beings think and act. This potential has two main aspects: 1) the ambiguity of the word as it is used in various contexts, and 2) the sense in which the word lies on the boundary between human self-consciousness and unself-consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfopposition to SB 78 A00994 2021-06-21.Pdf
    MEMORANDUM Date: June 21, 2021 To: Members, Pennsylvania General Assembly From: Frank P. Cervone, Executive Director, Support Center for Child Advocates Kathleen Creamer, Managing Attorney, Family Advocacy Unit Community Legal Services Terry Fromson, Managing Attorney, Women’s Law Project Elizabeth Randol, Legislative Director, ACLU of Pennsylvania RE: Senate Bill 78 (PN 65) – Kayden’s Law FRIENDS – We have only today learned that Senate Bill 78 may be moving in the PA Senate this week, and so we wanted to respond to recent points made by the bill’s sponsors. We continue to urge that the legislation will work to the detriment of the well-being of children involved in custody disputes. I expect there will be other voices joining in opposition, but because there is some urgency to legislative deliberations we are providing this memorandum now. Primarily, we again urge restraint and caution. Meaningful custody law reform that helps and does not hurt is best done in a deliberative process that balances competing needs and considerations. Interposing the discretion of legislators into complex child custody proceedings, and ignoring the insights and experiences of family court practitioners and judges, remains as problematic today as it did when this initiative was started by a tragic event and a passionate campaign. The course of this drafting process has been frustrating and disappointing. We have made repeated outreach to the lead sponsors throughout this legislative term, without response. None of the interested advocacy organizations even saw Amendment A00994 until after noon today! While we previously met extensively more than one year ago, there was no movement on the substantial problems we have raised, and instead persistent intransigence on key problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues in Victimization Research and the NCVS's Ability To
    Current Issues in Victimization Research and the NCVS’s Ability to Study Them Lynn A. Addington, J.D., Ph.D. Department of Justice, Law and Society American University Prepared for presentation at the Bureau of Justice Statistics Data User’s Workshop, February 12, 2008, Washington, D.C. Introduction and NCVS have played an essential role in shaping what researchers know about victimization as well as providing Thirty-five years have passed since the fielding of the first the national measure of criminal victimization for the National Crime Survey (NCS) and 15 years since its redesign United States.2 For the NCVS to continue in this crucial and emergence as the National Crime Victimization Survey and central role, it should be capable of serving the needs of (NCVS).1 This BJS Data Users Workshop presents a good, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Continuing to and much-needed, opportunity to examine how the survey meet the current needs of these various users of NCVS data has been (and could be) used in its present form as well as may require changes to the survey. to consider possible ways the survey could be changed to explore new issues of concern to victimization researchers. This paper has two primary aims. The first is to provide an Current Trends and Open Issues in overview of the current trends and issues in victimization Victimization Research research. Trends include topics that have attracted research Before examining specific issues, it is useful to place the attention as well as those yet to be fully explored as available current state of victimization research into a larger context.
    [Show full text]
  • Harassment and Victimisation Introduction
    Harassment and victimisation Introduction Stockholm University is to be characterised by its excellent environment for work and study. All employees and students shall be treated equally and with respect. At Stockholm University we shall jointly safeguard our work and study environment. A good environment enables creative development and excellent outcomes for work and study. At Stockholm University, victimisation, harassment associated with discrimination on any grounds and sexual harassment are unacceptable and must not take place. Victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment all jeopardise the affected person's job satisfaction and chances of success in work or study. As soon as the university becomes aware that someone has been affected, action will be taken immediately. In this brochure, Stockholm University explains • the forms that victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment may take, • what you can do if you or someone else becomes subjected to such behaviour, • the university's responsibilities, • the sanctions faced by those subjecting a person to victimisation, harassment or sexual harassment. Astrid Söderbergh Widding Vice-Chancellor Production: Human Resources Office, Student Services, Council for Equal Opportunities and Equality, and Matador kommunikation. Illustrations: Jan Ed. Printing: Ark-Tryckaren, 2015. 3 What is victimisation? All organisations experience occasional differences of opinion, conflicts and difficulties in working together. However, these occasional conflicts are not considered victimisation or bullying. Victimisation is defined as recurrent reprehensible or negative actions directed against individuals and that may lead to the person experiencing it being marginalised. Examples include deliberate insults, demeaning treatment, ostracism, withholding of information, persecution or threats. Victimisation brings with it the risk that individuals as well as entire groups will be adversely affected, in both the short and long terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Joking, Teasing Or Bullying? • a Kid Who Isn’T Very Nice to You Trips You in the Hall for the Third Time This Week
    LESSON 2 It Takes One Unit Joking, Teasing Grade 2 • Ages 7-8 TIME FRAME or Bullying? Preparation: 15 minutes Instruction: 30-60 minutes Students will distinguish the difference MATERIALS between joking, teasing and bullying and Large white poster sheet divided understand how joking, teasing and bullying into three columns with the following headings: Joking, Teasing, Bullying can strengthen or weaken relationships. Create three signs, one that says “JOKING”, another that Lesson Background for Teachers says, “TEASING”, third that says “BULLYING”; post on different walls This lesson builds on previous lessons in this unit. before class For more information on bullying visit PrevNet, an anti-bullying organization that RAK journals provides research, information and resources. www.prevnet.ca Kindness Concept Posters for Assertiveness, Respect Key Terms for Students LEARNING STANDARDS Consider writing key terms on the board before class to introduce vocabulary and increase understanding. Common Core: CCSS.ELA-Literacy. SL.2.1, 1a-c, 2, 3 Colorado: Compre- JOKING To say funny things or play tricks on people to make them hensive Health S.4, GLE.3, EO.a-c; laugh. Joking is between friends, makes all people laugh, Reading, Writing and Communicating isn’t meant to be mean, cruel or unkind, doesn’t make S.1, GLE.1, EO.b-f; S.1, GLE.2, EO.a-c people feel bad and stops before someone gets upset. Learning standards key TEASING Teasing doesn’t happen often. It means to make fun of someone by playfully saying unkind and hurtful things to the person; it can be friendly, but can turn unkind quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bullying of Teachers Is Slowly Entering the National Spotlight. How Will Your School Respond?
    UNDER ATTACK The bullying of teachers is slowly entering the national spotlight. How will your school respond? BY ADRIENNE VAN DER VALK ON NOVEMBER !, "#!$, Teaching Tolerance (TT) posted a blog by an anonymous contributor titled “Teachers Can Be Bullied Too.” The author describes being screamed at by her department head in front of colleagues and kids and having her employment repeatedly threatened. She also tells of the depres- sion and anxiety that plagued her fol- lowing each incident. To be honest, we debated posting it. “Was this really a TT issue?” we asked ourselves. Would our readers care about the misfortune of one teacher? How common was this experience anyway? The answer became apparent the next day when the comments section exploded. A popular TT blog might elicit a dozen or so total comments; readers of this blog left dozens upon dozens of long, personal comments every day—and they contin- ued to do so. “It happened to me,” “It’s !"!TEACHING TOLERANCE ILLUSTRATION BY BYRON EGGENSCHWILER happening to me,” “It’s happening in my for the Prevention of Teacher Abuse repeatedly videotaping the target’s class department. I don’t know how to stop it.” (NAPTA). Based on over a decade of without explanation and suspending the This outpouring was a surprise, but it work supporting bullied teachers, she target for insubordination if she attempts shouldn’t have been. A quick Web search asserts that the motives behind teacher to report the situation. revealed that educators report being abuse fall into two camps. Another strong theme among work- bullied at higher rates than profession- “[Some people] are doing it because place bullying experts is the acute need als in almost any other field.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Strategies to Reduce Employee Absenteeism Amongst Canadian Female Employees
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 Effective Strategies to Reduce Employee Absenteeism Amongst Canadian Female Employees Sue Haywood Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Health and Medical Administration Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral study by Susan Haywood has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Rollis Erickson, Committee Chairperson, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Michael Campo, Committee Member, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Mohamad Hammoud, University Reviewer, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract Effective Strategies to Reduce Employee Absenteeism Amongst Canadian Female Employees by Susan Haywood MA, Royal Military College of Canada, 2005 BA (Hons), Dalhousie University, 1997 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Walden University December 2020 Abstract High absenteeism in female employees costs Canadian hospitals millions of dollars annually. Leaders of Canadian hospitals who lack strategies to reduce absenteeism in female employees witness significant financial losses in their organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: the Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor’S Organizational Embodiment
    Journal of Applied Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association 2013, Vol. 98, No. 1, 158–168 0021-9010/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0030687 RESEARCH REPORT Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor’s Organizational Embodiment Mindy K. Shoss Robert Eisenberger Saint Louis University University of Houston Simon Lloyd D. Restubog Thomas J. Zagenczyk Australian National University Clemson University Why do employees who experience abusive supervision retaliate against the organization? We apply organizational support theory to propose that employees hold the organization partly responsible for abusive supervision. Depending on the extent to which employees identify the supervisor with the organization (i.e., supervisor’s organizational embodiment), we expected abusive supervision to be associated with low perceived organizational support (POS) and consequently with retribution against the organization. Across 3 samples, we found that abusive supervision was associated with decreased POS as moderated by supervisor’s organizational embodiment. In turn, reduced POS was related to heightened counterproductive work behavior directed against the organization and lowered in-role and extra-role performance. These findings suggest that employees partly attribute abusive supervision to negative valuation by the organization and, consequently, behave negatively toward and withhold positive contributions to it. Keywords: abusive supervision, perceived organizational support, workplace victimization Supervisors play an important role in the direction, evaluation, carried out on behalf of the organization (Aquino & Bommer, and coaching of employees. Some supervisors are supportive, 2003; Tepper, 2007). fostering subordinates’ abilities and empowering them to achieve Prior research has largely viewed the organization as an “inno- their goals (House, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Employees' Reactions to Their Own Gossip About Highly
    BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU: EMPLOYEES’ REACTIONS TO THEIR OWN GOSSIP ABOUT HIGHLY (UN)SUPPORTIVE SUPERVISORS By JULENA MARIE BONNER Bachelor of Arts in Business Management and Leadership Southern Virginia University Buena Vista, VA 2007 Master of Business Administration Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2012 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 2016 BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU: EMPLOYEES’ REACTIONS TO THEIR OWN GOSSIP ABOUT HIGHLY (UN)SUPPORTIVE SUPERVISORS Dissertation Approved: Dr. Rebecca L. Greenbaum Dissertation Adviser Dr. Debra L. Nelson Dr. Cynthia S. Wang Dr. Isaac J. Washburn ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The road to completing this degree and dissertation has been a long, bumpy one, with plenty of ups and downs. I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me along the way. Those who provided me with words of encouragement and support, those who talked me down from the ledge when the bumps seemed too daunting, and those who helped smooth the path by taking time to teach and guide me. I will forever be grateful for my family, friends, and the OSU faculty and doctoral students who provided me with endless amounts of support and guidance. I would like to especially acknowledge my dissertation chair, Rebecca Greenbaum, who has been a wonderful mentor and friend. I look up to her in so many ways, and am grateful for the time she has taken to help me grow and develop. I want to thank her for her patience, expertise, guidance, support, feedback, and encouragement over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Incivility, Bullying, and Workplace Violence
    AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION POSITION STATEMENT ON INCIVILITY, BULLYING, AND WORKPLACE VIOLENCE Effective Date: July 22, 2015 Status: New Position Statement Written By: Professional Issues Panel on Incivility, Bullying and Workplace Violence Adopted By: ANA Board of Directors I. PURPOSE This statement articulates the American Nurses Association (ANA) position with regard to individual and shared roles and responsibilities of registered nurses (RNs) and employers to create and sustain a culture of respect, which is free of incivility, bullying, and workplace violence. RNs and employers across the health care continuum, including academia, have an ethical, moral, and legal responsibility to create a healthy and safe work environment for RNs and all members of the health care team, health care consumers, families, and communities. II. STATEMENT OF ANA POSITION ANA’s Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements states that nurses are required to “create an ethical environment and culture of civility and kindness, treating colleagues, coworkers, employees, students, and others with dignity and respect” (ANA, 2015a, p. 4). Similarly, nurses must be afforded the same level of respect and dignity as others. Thus, the nursing profession will no longer tolerate violence of any kind from any source. All RNs and employers in all settings, including practice, academia, and research, must collaborate to create a culture of respect that is free of incivility, bullying, and workplace violence. Evidence-based best practices must be implemented to prevent and mitigate incivility, bullying, and workplace violence; to promote the health, safety, and wellness of RNs; and to ensure optimal outcomes across the health care continuum.
    [Show full text]