(EIS) for Manila Third Sewerage Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(EIS) for Manila Third Sewerage Project Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Manila Third Sewerage Project Public Disclosure Authorized Volume 4: Annex on Septage/Sludge Disposal in Lahar Area February 11, 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized (Revised Draft) Public Disclosure Authorized Manila Water Company, Inc. Manila, Philippines ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR SLUDGE/SEPTAGE-USE AS SOIL CONDITIONER FOR SUGAR CANE GROWTH IN LAHAR-LADEN AREAS Prepared by: Prepared for: 7th Floor, CLMC Building, 259-269 EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City Since 1955 in association with Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Ground Floor, MWSS Bldg., Katipunan Road, Balara, Quezon City Lichel Technologies, Inc. Unit 1910 Antel Global Corporate Center #3 Doña Julia Vargas Avenue Ortigas Center, Pasig City and MAIN REPORT Rm. 1021, 10/F Cityland Shaw Tower St. Francis Street cor. Shaw Blvd., Mandaluyong City TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES–1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................I ES-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................................I ES-3 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS .........................................................................................IV ES-4 SEPTAGE AND SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................VI ES-5 RESEARCH FINDINGS ON USE OF SEPTAGE/SLUDGE AS SOIL CONDITIONER ...........................IX ES-6 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION.................................................. X ES-7 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.............................................................................................XII ES-8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................XXI 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 STUDY APPROACH .......................................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................................................1-2 1.4.1 Review of On-going and Completed Experiments and Studies on Reviving the Lahar-laden Soil......1-2 1.4.2 Baseline Characterization......................................................................................................................1-3 1.4.3 Impact Identification, Prediction and Assessment ................................................................................1-3 1.4.4 Formulation of Environmental Management and Environmental Monitoring Plans ..........................1-4 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 THE PROJECT.............................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION .....................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 PROJECT DETAILS ........................................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.1 Sources of Biosolids ...............................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.2 Characteristics of Septage and Sludge ..................................................................................................2-3 3. ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITION............................................................................................3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Geology...................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Natural Hazards.....................................................................................................................................3-3 3.2.3 Pedology .................................................................................................................................................3-4 3.2.4 Meteorology............................................................................................................................................3-5 3.2.5 Air Quality and Noise Level...................................................................................................................3-7 3.2.6 Hydrogeology .........................................................................................................................................3-7 3.2.7 Surface Water Hydrology.......................................................................................................................3-9 3.2.8 Water and Sediment Quality Surveys...................................................................................................3-12 3.3 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT......................................................................................................................3-16 3.3.1 Aquatic Ecology Survey .......................................................................................................................3-16 3.3.2 Terrestrial Ecology ..............................................................................................................................3-19 3.4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.............................................................................................................3-20 3.4.1 Socio-Economic Setting .......................................................................................................................3-20 3.4.2 Household Survey.................................................................................................................................3-22 3.5 SOCIAL BASELINE ASSESSMENT .....................................................................................................3-27 3.5.1 First Level Consultation.......................................................................................................................3-28 3.5.2 Second Level Consultation...................................................................................................................3-28 3.6 PUBLIC HEALTH.........................................................................................................................................3-28 3.6.1 General Health Condition in the Project Areas ..................................................................................3-28 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION........................................................4-1 4.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................................................4-1 4.1.1 Natural Hazards.....................................................................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Erosion and Surface Soil Runoff............................................................................................................4-2 Manila Third Sewerage Project (MTSP) i TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1.3 Surface and Groundwater Contamination.............................................................................................4-2 4.1.4 Land Contamination...............................................................................................................................4-3 4.1.5 Odor Generation ....................................................................................................................................4-5 4.1.6 Noise Generation....................................................................................................................................4-5 4.1.7 Dust Generation .....................................................................................................................................4-6 4.1.8 Traffic Impacts .......................................................................................................................................4-6 4.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ...................................................................................................................4-6 4.2.1 Aquatic Ecology .....................................................................................................................................4-6 4.2.2 Terrestrial Ecology ................................................................................................................................4-6
Recommended publications
  • The Great History
    CAPAS The Great History Created in 1710, Capas is among the oldest towns of Tarlac together with Bamban (1710), Paniqui (1574) and Tarlac (1686). Its creation was justified by numerous settlements which were already established in the river banks of Cutcut River since the advent of the eighteenth century. The settlements belonged to the domain of Pagbatuan and Gudya; two sitios united by Capitan Mariano Capiendo when he founded the municipality. Historical records suggest three versions on how Capas got its name. The first version, as told, was originated from capas-capas, the “edible flower” similar to that of the caturay or the melaguas that abundantly grew along the Cutcut river banks. The second version, accordingly, was adapted from a “cotton tree” called capas, in Aeta dialect. The third version suggested that it was derived from the first three letters of the surnames of the town’s early settlers, namely: Capitulo, Capitly, Capiendo, Capuno, Caponga, Capingian, Caparas, Capera, Capunpue, Capit, Capil, Capunfuerza, Capunpun, Caputol, Capul and Capan. Assertively, they were called “caps” or “capas” in the local language. Between 1946-1951, registered barangays of Capas were Lawy, O’Donnell, Aranguren, Sto. Domingo, Talaga, Sta. Lucia, Bueno, Sta. Juliana, Sampucao, Calingcuan, Dolores and Manga, which were the 12 barrios during Late President Elpidio Quirino issued the Executive Order No. 486 providing “for the collection and compilation of historical data regarding barrios, towns, cities and provinces.” Today, Capas constitutes 20 barangays including all 12 except Calingcuan was changed to Estrada, Sampucao to Maruglu, Sto. Domingo was divided in two and barangays such as Sta.
    [Show full text]
  • Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA
    2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA 201,233 BALER (Capital) 36,010 Barangay I (Pob.) 717 Barangay II (Pob.) 374 Barangay III (Pob.) 434 Barangay IV (Pob.) 389 Barangay V (Pob.) 1,662 Buhangin 5,057 Calabuanan 3,221 Obligacion 1,135 Pingit 4,989 Reserva 4,064 Sabang 4,829 Suclayin 5,923 Zabali 3,216 CASIGURAN 23,865 Barangay 1 (Pob.) 799 Barangay 2 (Pob.) 665 Barangay 3 (Pob.) 257 Barangay 4 (Pob.) 302 Barangay 5 (Pob.) 432 Barangay 6 (Pob.) 310 Barangay 7 (Pob.) 278 Barangay 8 (Pob.) 601 Calabgan 496 Calangcuasan 1,099 Calantas 1,799 Culat 630 Dibet 971 Esperanza 458 Lual 1,482 Marikit 609 Tabas 1,007 Tinib 765 National Statistics Office 1 2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population Bianuan 3,440 Cozo 1,618 Dibacong 2,374 Ditinagyan 587 Esteves 1,786 San Ildefonso 1,100 DILASAG 15,683 Diagyan 2,537 Dicabasan 677 Dilaguidi 1,015 Dimaseset 1,408 Diniog 2,331 Lawang 379 Maligaya (Pob.) 1,801 Manggitahan 1,760 Masagana (Pob.) 1,822 Ura 712 Esperanza 1,241 DINALUNGAN 10,988 Abuleg 1,190 Zone I (Pob.) 1,866 Zone II (Pob.) 1,653 Nipoo (Bulo) 896 Dibaraybay 1,283 Ditawini 686 Mapalad 812 Paleg 971 Simbahan 1,631 DINGALAN 23,554 Aplaya 1,619 Butas Na Bato 813 Cabog (Matawe) 3,090 Caragsacan 2,729 National Statistics Office 2 2010 Census of Population and
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform in the Philippines (Newest Outline)
    Politics and Economics of Land Reform in the Philippines: a survey∗ By Nobuhiko Fuwa Chiba University, 648 Matsudo, Matsudo-City, Chiba, 271-8510 Japan [email protected] Phone/Fax: 81-47-308-8932 May, 2000 ∗ A background paper prepared for a World Bank Study, Dynamism of Rural Sector Growth: Policy Lessons from East Asian Countries. The author acknowledges helpful comments by Arsenio Balisacan. Introduction Recent developments in both theoretical and empirical economics literature have demonstrated many aspects of the negative socio-economic consequences of high inequality in the distribution of wealth. High inequality tends to hinder subsequent economic growth (e. g., Persson and Tabellini 1994?), inhibits the poor from realizing their full potential in economic activities and human development through credit constraints (e. g., Deininger and Squire 1998), encourage rent-seeking activities (e. g., Rodrik 1996), and seriously hinder the poverty reduction impact of economic growth (e. g., Ravallion and Dutt ??). The Philippines is a classic example of an economy suffering from all of these consequences. The Philippines has long been known for its high inequality in distribution of wealth and income; unlike many of its Asian neighbors characterized by relatively less inequality by international standards, the Philippine economy has often been compared to Latin American countries which are characterized by high inequality in land distribution. Partly due to its historically high inequality there has long been intermittent incidence of peasant unrest and rural insurgencies in the Philippines. As a result, the issue of land reform (or ‘agrarian reform’ as more commonly called in the Philippines, of which land reform constitutes the major part) has continuously been on political agenda at least since the early part of the 20th century; nevertheless land reform in the Philippines has been, and still is, an unfinished business.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarcane Roadmap 2020
    SUGARCANE ROADMAP 2020 CY 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 Version SEPTEMBER 2015 Sugarcane Roadmap 2020 “A Medium-Term Plan for the Philippine Sugarcane Industry” Released by the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA) on September 2015 through the Support and Guidance of the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Page 2 of 309 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Sugar Regulatory Administration acknowledges the support of the sugarcane industry stakeholders especially the MDDCs, the services and efforts of those who provided the data, prepared and developed the contents of the “Sugarcane Roadmap 2020” and those who guided and assisted during the stakeholders consultations down to the sugarcane mill district level. Rafael L. Coscolluela DTI Consultant / Facilitator USEC Adrian Cristobal Jr. Undersecretary for Industry Development & Trade Policy Group, DTI Managing Head, BOI USEC Segfredo Serrano Undersecretary of Policy, Planning, Research and Development & Regulations, DA Director Nestor Arcansalin Resource-Based Industries Department, BOI-DTI Dr. Rolando Dy and Ms. Florence Sevilla DA Consultant / Facilitator BOI Secretariat Rosemarie Ilagan Elizabeth Cristina Pahilan Mario Pocholo Orense SRA Secretariat Rosemarie S. Gumera Leilani S. Abacan Digna R. Gonzales Nina Belen Concepcion C. Ruby Magdalena D. Palanca Felina M. Quiambao Alice Maliwat Loida S. Abcede Zenaida E. Tubiera Page 3 of 309 ENDORSEMENT OF SRA TO DA & DTI Page 4 of 309 ENDORSEMENT OF SRA TO DTI ENDORSEMENT OF INDUSTRY GROUP TO DTI & DA Page 5 of 309 Page 6
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform and the Difficult Road to Peace in the Philippine Countryside
    Report December 2015 Agrarian reform and the difficult road to peace in the Philippine countryside By Danilo T. Carranza Executive summary Agrarian reform and conflict in the rural areas of the Philippines are closely intertwined. The weak government implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, inherent loopholes in the law, strong landowner resistance, weak farmers’ organisations, and the continuing espousal by the New People’s Army of its own agrarian revolution combine to make the government’s agrarian reform programme only partially successful in breaking up land monopolies. This is why poverty is still pronounced in many rural areas. The rise of an agrarian reform movement has significantly contributed to the partial success of the government’s agrarian reform programme. But the government has not been able to tap the full potential of this movement to push for faster and more meaningful agrarian reform. The agrarian reform dynamics between pro- and anti-agrarian reform actors create social tensions that often lead to violence, of which land-rights claimants are often the victims. This is exacerbated and in many ways encouraged by the government’s failure to fulfil its obligation to protect the basic human rights of land-rights claimants. This report outlines the pace and direction of agrarian reform in the Philippines and its role in fighting poverty and promoting peace in rural areas. It emphasises the importance of reform-oriented peasant movements and more effective government implementation to the success of agrarian reform. The report also asserts the need for the government and the armed left to respect human rights and international humanitarian law in promoting the full participation of land-rights claimants in shaping and crafting public policy around land rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small Powers in World Politics Contours of an African-Asian Critical Realism
    African and Asian Studies �3 (�0�4) �3-3� AFRICAN AND ASIAN STUDIES brill.com/aas The Small Powers in World Politics Contours of an African-Asian Critical Realism Pak Nung Wong Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China [email protected] George Klay Kieh Jr. Department of Political Science and Planning, University of West Georgia, GA, USA Abstract This paper aims to conceptualize a framework for better understanding the challenges, actions and rationales of the African and Asian small powers in the post-1989 global order. The paper will be divided into three parts. First, it will review the literature on small power/state studies. Second, following a critique of the major approaches in small power studies, we will argue for the need for a critical realist perspective to better cap- ture the relationships between domestic politics and foreign relations of the small power in Africa and Asia. Third, against the comparative trajectories in which the U.S. has attained global hegemony after 1991 and China has gradually become a great power after 2000, in light of the recent U.S. containment policy shift towards China which has stirred up versatile dynamics of East Asian small power politics, in favor of a global multi-polarity, we will highlight the foundation of our approach for building the strong small powers in terms of two main aspects of economic nationalism: resource-focused and sovereignty-asserting. Keywords African and Asian politics – African-Asian critical realism – hegemony and multi- polarity – international relations – small power politics – U.S.-China relations © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���4 | doi �0.��63/�569��08-��34��Downloaded83 from Brill.com10/02/2021 11:56:42AM via free access 14 Wong and Kieh Introduction Pressured by internal public demand, the early 1990s witnessed the Philippines successfully negotiated for the withdrawal of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Report
    Parallel Report On t he Occasion of t he Review of t he ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Philippines Com bined 5t h and 6t h Periodic Report s t o t he UN CESCR at t he 59t h Session Sept em ber 2016 FIAN Philippines 91 Madasalin St reet , Sikat una Village, Quezon Cit y - Philippines ht t p:/ / w w w.fianphilippines.org/ FIAN Int ernat ional PO Box 10 22 43 69012 Heidelberg - Germ any w w w.fian.org Cover phot o: Beringer, Ast rud. "Hacienda Mat ias peasant s finally harvest ing peacefully". July 2015. Sept em ber 2016 ACRONYMS 4Ps Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program A&F Agriculture and Fisheries AFMA Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act A.O. Administrative Order ARBO Agrarian reform Beneficiaries Organizations ARMM Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao CADT Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title CARL Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law CARP Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program CARPER Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program Extension with Reform CESCR Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CCT Conditional Cash Transfer CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women CEO Chief Executive Officer CHR Commission on Human Rights CLOA Certificate of Land Ownership Award CRAF Commission on the Right to Adequate Food CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child CRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities CSOs Civil Society Organizations DAR Department of Agrarian Reform DARAB DAR Adjudication Board DBM Department of Budget and Management DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources DSWD Department
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC
    Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC HACIENDA LUISITA, G.R. No. 171101 INCORPORATED, Petitioner, Present: LUISITA INDUSTRIAL PARK CORONA, C.J., CORPORATION and RIZAL CARPIO, COMMERCIAL BANKING VELASCO, JR., CORPORATION, LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, Petitioners-in-Intervention, BRION, PERALTA, - versus - BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, PRESIDENTIAL AGRARIAN ABAD, REFORM COUNCIL; SECRETARY VILLARAMA, JR., NASSER PANGANDAMAN OF THE PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN MENDOZA, and REFORM; ALYANSA NG MGA SERENO, MANGGAGAWANG BUKID NG REYES, HACIENDA LUISITA, RENE PERLAS-BERNABE, JJ. GALANG, NOEL MALLARI, and JULIO SUNIGA[1] and his SUPERVISORY GROUP OF THE HACIENDA LUISITA, INC. and WINDSOR ANDAYA, Promulgated: Respondents. November 22, 2011 x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x R E S O L U T I O N VELASCO, JR., J.: For resolution are the (1) Motion for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by petitioner Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI); (2) Motion for Partial Reconsideration dated July 20, 2011 filed by public respondents Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) and Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR); (3) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 19, 2011 filed by private respondent Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang Bukid sa Hacienda Luisita (AMBALA); (4)Motion for Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by respondent-intervenor Farmworkers Agrarian Reform Movement, Inc. (FARM); (5) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by private respondents Noel Mallari, Julio Suniga, Supervisory Group of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (Supervisory Group) and Windsor Andaya (collectively referred to as “Mallari, et al.”); and (6) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 22, 2011 filed by private respondents Rene Galang and AMBALA.[2] On July 5, 2011, this Court promulgated a Decision[3] in the above- captioned case, denying the petition filed by HLI and affirming Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015Suspension 2008Registere
    LIST OF SEC REGISTERED CORPORATIONS FY 2008 WHICH FAILED TO SUBMIT FS AND GIS FOR PERIOD 2009 TO 2013 Date SEC Number Company Name Registered 1 CN200808877 "CASTLESPRING ELDERLY & SENIOR CITIZEN ASSOCIATION (CESCA)," INC. 06/11/2008 2 CS200719335 "GO" GENERICS SUPERDRUG INC. 01/30/2008 3 CS200802980 "JUST US" INDUSTRIAL & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC. 02/28/2008 4 CN200812088 "KABAGANG" NI DOC LOUIE CHUA INC. 08/05/2008 5 CN200803880 #1-PROBINSYANG MAUNLAD SANDIGAN NG BAYAN (#1-PRO-MASA NG 03/12/2008 6 CN200831927 (CEAG) CARCAR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE GROUP RESCUE UNIT, INC. 12/10/2008 CN200830435 (D'EXTRA TOURS) DO EXCEL XENOS TEAM RIDERS ASSOCIATION AND TRACK 11/11/2008 7 OVER UNITED ROADS OR SEAS INC. 8 CN200804630 (MAZBDA) MARAGONDONZAPOTE BUS DRIVERS ASSN. INC. 03/28/2008 9 CN200813013 *CASTULE URBAN POOR ASSOCIATION INC. 08/28/2008 10 CS200830445 1 MORE ENTERTAINMENT INC. 11/12/2008 11 CN200811216 1 TULONG AT AGAPAY SA KABATAAN INC. 07/17/2008 12 CN200815933 1004 SHALOM METHODIST CHURCH, INC. 10/10/2008 13 CS200804199 1129 GOLDEN BRIDGE INTL INC. 03/19/2008 14 CS200809641 12-STAR REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. 06/24/2008 15 CS200828395 138 YE SEN FA INC. 07/07/2008 16 CN200801915 13TH CLUB OF ANTIPOLO INC. 02/11/2008 17 CS200818390 1415 GROUP, INC. 11/25/2008 18 CN200805092 15 LUCKY STARS OFW ASSOCIATION INC. 04/04/2008 19 CS200807505 153 METALS & MINING CORP. 05/19/2008 20 CS200828236 168 CREDIT CORPORATION 06/05/2008 21 CS200812630 168 MEGASAVE TRADING CORP. 08/14/2008 22 CS200819056 168 TAXI CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform's Constraints on Land Acquisition and Development
    Global Business & Development Law Journal Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 13 1-1-1999 Agrarian Reform's Constraints on Land Acquisition and Development for Non-Agricultural Use in the Philippines Janeth San Pedro University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Janeth San Pedro, Agrarian Reform's Constraints on Land Acquisition and Development for Non-Agricultural Use in the Philippines, 12 Transnat'l Law. 319 (1999). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe/vol12/iss1/13 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Business & Development Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Agrarian Reform's Constraints on Land Acquisition and Development for Non-agricultural Use in the Philippines Janeth San Pedro TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRoDUC ION ............................................... 320 II. BACKGROUND ............................................... 321 A. Land Reform or AgrarianReform? ........................... 321 B. PastAgrarian Reforms .................................... 322 1. Land Reform Act of 1955 ............................... 322 2. The AgriculturalLand Reform Code of 1963 ............... 324 3. PresidentialDecree No. 27 ............................. 325 I. THE COMPREHENSIVE AGRARLAN REFORM
    [Show full text]
  • Balanga City, Bataan Orion, Bataan
    CLES 1 Vercons Balanga City, Bataan 2 Owengen Orion, Bataan 3 Life Bank Foundation Inc. Balanga City, Bataan 4 Jay-del Construction Limay, Bataan 5 Bataan Commercial Enterprice Orani, Bataan 6 ABESCO Balanga City, Bataan 7 Gabby's Marketing Balanga City, Bataan 8 Crown Royale Balanga City, Bataan 9 Color Me Crazy Balanga City, Bataan 10 Ocampos Balanga City, Bataan 11 Sunset Cove Morong, Bataan 12 Seapine Mariveles, Bataan 13 Liberty Value Loan Pilar, Bataan 14 Studio 23 Hair and Body Salon Balanga City, Bataan 15 Lockheed Security Agency Limay, Bataan 16 Prime Power Agency Limay, Bataan 17 Plaza Hotel Balanga City, Bataan 18 J.E Manalo Limay, Bataan 19 Terp Asia Balanga City, Bataan 20 Hotel Brizo Morong, Bataan 21 Phi-Phi Hotel and Beach Resort Morong, Bataan 22 Balgon Hardware Mariveles, Bataan 23 Mariveles Bag Makers Mariveles, Bataan 24 Card MBA Inc. Balanga City, Bataan 25 Goldridge Construction Balanga City, Bataan 26 ICMC Balanga City, Bataan 27 DIDP Mariveles, Bataan 28 FS Phil corp. Limay, Bataan 29 Fundline Finance Corp. Balanga City, Bataan 30 Racal Motor Sales Balanga City, Bataan 31 Cindy's Balanga City, Bataan 32 Bluelight Security Agency Mariveles, Bataan 33 JPN Coiltech Mariveles, Bataan 34 Biggy and Bernie Mariveles, Bataan 35 Herma Shipyard Mariveles, Bataan CLES 36 Phil Am Mariveles, Bataan 37 Kisa Inc. Pilar, Bataan 38 Lingap Kapwa MPCA Balanga, Bataan 39 King's Garden Balanga, Bataan 40 Terp Asia Balanga, Bataan 41 Koree Plastic Corporation Mariveles, Bataan 42 Caro Incorporation Pilar, Bataan 43 Organic Fairment Abucay, Bataan 44 Samasaka Bagac, Bataan 45 UNTV Balanga, Bataan 46 Bataan White Corals Morong, Bataan 47 AMPC Abucay, Bataan 48 JBSS Quezon City 49 Security Bank Balanga, Bataan 50 Puregold Orani, Bataan 51 Puregold Balanga, Bataan 52 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mines and Geosciences Bureau Regional Office No
    ANNEX-B (MPSA) Republic of the Philippines Department of Environment and Natural Resources MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU REGIONAL OFFICE NO. III MINING TENEMENTS STATISTICS REPORT FOR MONTH OF APRIL, 2020 MINERAL PRODUCTION AND SHARING AGREEMENT (MPSA) ANNEX-B %OWNERSHIP HOLDER OF MAJOR SEQ (Integer no. of PARCEL DATE_FILED DATE_APPROVED TENEMENT_NO TEN_TYPE (Name, Address, Contact Nos. And FILIPINO AND AREA (has.) BARANGAY MUNICIPALITY PROVINCE COMMODITY TENEMENT_NO) No. (mm/dd/yyyy) (mm/dd/yyyy) Authorized Representative FOREIGN PERSON A. Mining Tenement Applications 1. Under Process BALER GOLD MINIG CORP. Mario Diabelo, gold , copper, 1 *PMPSA-IV-154 APSA 100% Filipino 3442.0000 11/8/1994 San Luis Aurora R. Guillermo - President Diteki silver MULTICREST MINING CORP. gold , copper, 2 *PMPSA-IV-160 APSA 100% Filipino 1701.0000 11/28/1994 Ditike, Palayan San Luis Aurora Manuel Lagman - Vice President silver OMNI MINES DEV'T CORP. Alfredo gold , copper, 3 *PMPSA-IV-184 APSA 100% Filipino 648.0000 3/7/1995 San Luis Aurora San Miguel Jr. - President silver BALER CONSOLIDATED MINES , copper, gold, 4 *AMA-IVA-07 APSA INC. 100% Filipino 7857.0000 10/3/1995 San Luis Aurora silver, etc. Michael Bernardino - Director SAGITARIUS ALPHA REALTY CORPORATION 5 APSA000019III APSA Reynaldo P. Mendoza - President 106 100% Filipino 81.0000 7/4/1991 Tubo-tubo Sta. Cruz Zambales limestone, etc. Universal Re Bldg., Paseo De Roxas, Makati City BENGUET CORPORATION Address: 845 Arnaiz Avanue, 1223 Masinloc, 6 APSA000020III APSA 100% Filipino 2434.0000 7/5/1991 Zambales chromite, etc. Makati City Tel. Candelaria No. 812-1380/819-0174 BENGUET CORPORATION Address: 845 Arnaiz Avanue, 1223 7 APSA000021III APSA 100% Filipino 1572.0000 7/5/1991 Masinloc Zambales chromite, etc.
    [Show full text]