DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1805.08326V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 7 Dec 2018 Dwarf Galaxies (Belokurov Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1805.08326V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 7 Dec 2018 Dwarf Galaxies (Belokurov Et Al Draft version December 10, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Rotating halo traced by the K giant stars from LAMOST and Gaia Hao Tian1 (LAMOST Fellow) Chao Liu,1 Yan Xu,1 and Xiangxiang Xue1 1Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road 20A, Beijing 100012, PR China; (Received December 10, 2018; Revised December 10, 2018; Accepted |{) Submitted to |- ABSTRACT With the help of Gaia DR2, we are able to obtain the full 6-D phase space information for stars from LAMOST DR5. With high precision of position, velocity, and metallicity, the rotation of the local stellar halo is presented using the K giant stars with [Fe/H]< −1 dex within 4 kpc from the Sun. By fitting the rotational velocity distribution with three Gaussian components, stellar halo, disk, and a +4 −1 counter-rotating hot population, we find that the local halo progradely rotates with VT = +27−5 km s −1 providing the local standard of rest velocity of VLSR = 232 km s . Meanwhile, we obtain the dispersion +4 −1 of rotational velocity is σT = 72−4 km s . Although the rotational velocity strongly depends on the choice of VLSR, the trend of prograde rotation is substantial even when VLSR is set at as low as 220 km s−1. Moreover, we derive the rotation for subsamples with different metallicities and find that the rotational velocity is essentially not correlated with [Fe/H]. This may hint a secular evolution origin of the prograde rotation. It shows that the metallicity of the progradely rotating halo is peaked within -1.9<[Fe/H]<-1.6 without considering the selection effect. We also find a small fraction of counter- rotating stars with larger dispersion and lower metallicity. Finally, the disk component rotates with +6 −1 +3 −1 VT = +182−6 km s and σT = 45−3 km s , which is quite consistent with the metal-weak thick disk population. Keywords: galaxies: individual (Milky Way) | Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics | Galaxy: halo | Stars: individual (K-giants) 1. INTRODUCTION stream, discovered by Ibata et al.(1994), many streams It has been widely accepted that the Milky Way, at have been discovered with matched filter method (Rock- least the halo, was formed through hierarchically merg- osi et al. 2002; Grillmair & Carlin 2016; Grillmair & ing smaller stellar systems, such as globular clusters and Dionatos 2006a,b,c; Grillmair 2009) and other methods (Mateu et al. 2018). But the streams are not the final arXiv:1805.08326v2 [astro-ph.GA] 7 Dec 2018 dwarf galaxies (Belokurov et al. 2006). With a long time evolving, the stellar members of those merged sys- fate of those merged clusters or dwarf galaxies, a longer tems will be continuously stripped and then form stellar evolving time will make the streams more and more re- streams (Johnston et al. 1999). Such phenomena have laxed and finally become part of the smoothing halo, been widely searched with photometric sky surveys, e.g. i.e. it is not visible in the geometric space (Helmi et SDSS (York et al. 2000) and Pan-STARRS (Bernard al. 1999), even blurred in the phase space (Helmi & de et al. 2016). Since the first stellar stream, Sagittarius Zeeuw 2000; Sanderson et al. 2015). Assuming those merged stellar systems fell in with random orbits (Sanderson et al. 2015), the contribu- Corresponding author: Chao Liu tion of z−axis angular momentum Lz overall should [email protected] be around 0. The net angular mometum is directly related to the merging history, not only including the 2 Tian et al. minor mergers of the globular cluster and dwarf galax- mates led to a debate (Sch¨onrich et al. 2011; Beers et al. ies, such as the Sagittarius Stream, but also includ- 2012). This will be highly improved by the Gaia mission ing the major merger events, such as the recently dis- (Perryman et al. 2001). covered Gaia-Enceladus(Helmi et al. 2018), also named GDR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018a,b,c,d,e,f) con- Gaia-Sausage(Belokurov et al. 2018), which contibutes tains ∼1.3 billion stars high accuracy proper motions a larger fraction of retrogradely rotating stars. Another and parallaxes, which have brought a series of amazing possibility is that the merged halo was driven to slowly results about the halo, such as the velocity determina- rotate by the non-axisymmetric structure in the disk tion of globular clusters and rotation curve of the Large (e.g. bar) in a long time scale (Athanassoula et al. 2013). Magellanic Cloud (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018e). Be- The studies on dynamics of the halo have been done sides, Gaia Collaboration et al.(2018e) also derived a since 1980s (Frenk & White 1980) who used 66 clus- lower limit total mass for the Milky Way. ters to constrained the rotation velocity 60±26 km s−1. Guoshoujing Telescope (the Large Sky Area Multi- As the velocity ellipsoid is directly related to the mass Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope, hereafter LAM- distribution of the halo (Binney & Tremaine 2008), OST) is a 4-meter, quasi-meridian, reflecting Schmidt more work focused on the distribution of the dispersions telescope which makes it an efficient spectroscopic tele- (Sommer-Larsen et al. 1997; Sirko et al. 2004; Smith et scope (Cui et al. 2012; Deng et al. 2012; Zhao et al. al. 2009; Hattori et al. 2013; Kafle et al. 2013; Loebman 2012). Liu et al.(2017) and Xu et al.(2018) used metal et al. 2018). poor K giants from LAMOST to trace the density pro- Because of the difficulty of observation of proper mo- file of the halo and found an inner oblate, outer nearly tions, especially for distant stars. Morrison et al.(1990) spherical profile. Recently, LAMOST has released its studied the kinematics of the halo and disk using the 5th data (DR5). As low resolution of R = 1800, the G and K giant stars within 4 kpc from the Sun, and uncertainties of Teff and [Fe/H] are typical ∼ 100 K and −1 claimed a prograde rotation of VT = 25 ± 15 km s . ∼ 0:1 dex, respectively, for the stellar spectra with signal They also showed that the metallicity of the thick disk to noise ratio larger than 30. stars can be as low as -1.6. Smith et al.(2009) studied The paper studies the rotation of the local stellar halo the kinematics of the local halo using ∼1700 solar neigh- using the conbination of the GDR2 and LAMOST DR5 bourhood subdwarfs and found that the stellar halo ex- K-giant stars and is constructed as follow. In Section2, hibits no rotation and the rotational velocity Vφ disper- the sample stars are selected. The model of the distibu- sion 82 ± 2 km s−1 , what should be noticed is that the tion of rotational velociy is developed in Section3. The typical velocity errors are large, about 30 to 50 km s−1. results are discussed in Section4. The conclusions are More recently, the progress of the observations and listed in Section5. data analysis techniques, high precision proper motions have been obtained through combining catalogues ob- 2. DATA SAMPLE tained at different epochs cross a long time baseline In this work, we use K giant stars selected from LAM- (Tian et al. 2017; Belokurov et al. 2018). Deason et al. OST DR5 based on the criteria suggested by Liu et al. (2017) used the 3D velocity calculated from the proper (2014) to study the rotation of the nearby halo. After motion of different tracers, including RR Lyrae, Blue cross-matching with GDR2, we obtained the parallax, Horizontal Branch (BHB) and K giant stars, in a distant proper motions, radial velocities and metallicities for the volume from Gaia Data Release (hereafter GDR) 1 and tracer stars. A robust metallicity cut with [Fe/H]< −1 SDSS dataset to study the halo rotation. A prograde is used to remove the majority of disk stars, which leaves rotation was found with V = 14±2±10 km s−1. What T 6660 K giant stars. In this case most of the thin disk is more, the metal richer stars are showing a stronger stars and many thick disk stars will be removed. As we prograde rotation which is explained as a small fraction will discuss in the following sections, the left disk com- of halo stars formed in situ. Kafle et al.(2017) also ponent will be considered during the analysis. With the found a similar trend with samples of Main Sequence distances from Bailer-Jones et al.(2018), the samples Turnoff and K giant stars only with radial velocity aval- within 4 kpc and relative distance error D =D < 0:2 ible. What is different is that the metal poorer K giant error are further selected so that the distance estimates are stars show a retrograde rotation. reliable, and 3827 stars are left in the sample. Com- Since Carollo et al.(2007) discovered the inner and paring the radial velocities between GDR2 and LAM- outer halo and claimed that the inner halo is rotating OST, we find an offset RV − RV of 5.38 km progradely, in contrast the outer components is rotating Gaia LAMOST s−1, which was also mentioned by Tian et al.(2015) and retrogradely. But the systematic bias in distance esti- Sch¨onrich & Aumer(2017). To avoid this systematics, Halo Rotation 3 0.8 103 pmra error 400 pmdec error 0.6 ) 300 * ( t M 2 n D 0.4 10 200 u o c count(*) 0.2 100 0 1 0.0 10 0 1 2 3 4 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0 2 4 DM proper motion error RV Figure 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 10 Milky Way II
    Measuring Structure of the Galaxy • To invert the measured distribution of stars One needs to make a lot – A(m,l,b): # of stars at an of 'corrections' the biggest one apparent mag m, at galactic is due to extinction so one coordinates l,b per sq degree does not repeat Herschel's error! per unit mag. – N(m,l,b): cumulative # of stars with mag < m, at galactic coordinates l,b per sq degree per unit mag. N(m,l,b)=∫ A(m',l,b) dm Into a true 3-D structure 36 Need to Measure Extinction Accurately 37 APOGEE Results • Metallicity across the Milky Way • An example of the fine grain knowledge now being obtained. 38 Gaia Capability • Gaia will survey ~1/4 of the MW (Luri and Robin) 39 Early GAIA Results • Proper motions in the M67 star cluster-accuracies of ~5mas/year (5x10-9 radians/year or 4.3x10-5 pc/year (42 km/sec- 2.5x the speed of the earth around the sun) at distance of M67 ) 40 MW II • Use of gas (HI) to trace velocity field and thus mass of the disk (discuss a bit of the geometry details in the next lecture) – dependence on distance to center of MW • properties of MW (e.g. mass of components) • Cosmic Rays – only directly observable in MW • Start of dynamics 41 Timescales 7 • crossing time tc=2R/σ∼5x10 yrs (R10kpc/v200) • dynamical time td=sqrt(3π/16Gρ)- related to the orbital time; assumption homogenous sphere of density ρ • Relaxation time- the time for a system to 'forget' its initial conditions S+G (eq.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Drag Interstellar Objects and Galactic Dynamical Streams
    Draft version March 25, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 High-Drag Interstellar Objects And Galactic Dynamical Streams T.M. Eubanks1 1Space Initiatives Inc, Clifton, Virginia 20124 (Received; Revised March 25, 2019; Accepted) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT The nature of 1I/’Oumuamua (henceforth, 1I), the first interstellar object known to pass through the solar system, remains mysterious. Feng & Jones noted that the incoming 1I velocity vector “at infinity” (v∞) is close to the motion of the Pleiades dynamical stream (or Local Association), and suggested that 1I is a young object ejected from a star in that stream. Micheli et al. subsequently detected non-gravitational acceleration in the 1I trajectory; this acceleration would not be unusual in an active comet, but 1I observations failed to reveal any signs of activity. Bialy & Loeb hypothesized that the anomalous 1I acceleration was instead due to radiation pressure, which would require an extremely low mass-to-area ratio (or area density). Here I show that a low area density can also explain the very close kinematic association of 1I and the Pleiades stream, as it renders 1I subject to drag capture by interstellar gas clouds. This supports the radiation pressure hypothesis and suggests that there is a significant population of low area density ISOs in the Galaxy, leading, through gas drag, to enhanced ISO concentrations in the galactic dynamical streams. Any interstellar object entrained in a dynamical stream will have a predictable incoming v∞; targeted deep surveys using this information should be able to find dynamical stream objects months to as much as a year before their perihelion, providing the lead time needed for fast-response missions for the future in situ exploration of such objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7 24 Sep 2010 Outline
    Astronomy 330 Lecture 7 24 Sep 2010 Outline Review Counts: A(m), Euclidean slope, Olbers’ paradox Stellar Luminosity Function: Φ(M,S) Structure of the Milky Way: disk, bulge, halo Milky Way kinematics Rotation and Oort’s constants Euclidean slope = Solar motion 0.6m Disk vs halo ) What would A(m An example this imply? log m Review: Galactic structure Stellar Luminosity Function: Φ What does it look like? How do you measure it? What’s Malmquist Bias? Modeling the MW Exponential disk: ρdisk ~ ρ0exp(-z/z0-R/hR) (radially/vertically) -3 Halo – ρhalo ~ ρ0r (RR Lyrae stars, globular clusters) See handout – Benjamin et al. (2005) Galactic Center/Bar Galactic Model: disk component 10 Ldisk = 2 x 10 L (B band) hR = 3 kpc (scale length) z0 = (scale height) round numbers! = 150 pc (extreme Pop I) = 350 pc (Pop I) = 1 kpc (Pop II) Rmax = 12 kpc Rmin = 3 kpc Inside 3 kpc, the Galaxy is a mess, with a bar, expanding shell, etc… Galactic Bar Lots of other disk galaxies have a central bar (elongated structure). Does the Milky Way? Photometry – what does the stellar distribution in the center of the Galaxy look like? 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bar-like distribution: N = N0 exp (-0.5r ), where r = (x +y )/R + z /z0 Observe A(m) as a function of Galactic coordinates (l,b) Use N as an estimate of your source distribution: counts A(m,l,b) appear bar-like Sevenster (1990s) found overabundance of OH/IR stars in 1stquadrant. Asymmetry is also seen in RR Lyrae distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in the Determination of Some Galactic Constants in the Milky Way
    Recent advances in the determination of some Galactic constants in the Milky Way Jacques P. Vallée National Research Council of Canada, National Science Infrastructure, Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, B.C., Canada V9E 2E7 Keywords: Galactic structure; Galactic constants; Galactic disk; statistics Abstract. Here we statistically evaluate recent advances in determining the Sun- Galactic Center distance (Rsun) as well as recent measures of the orbital velocity around the Galactic Center (Vlsr), and the angular rotation parameters of various objects. Recent statistical results point to Rsun = 8.0 ± 0.2 kpc, Vlsr= 230 ± 3 km/s, and angular rotation at the Sun (ω) near 29 ± 1 km/s/kpc for the gas and stars at the Local Standard of Rest, and near 23 ± 2 km/s/kpc for the spiral pattern itself. This angular difference is similar to what had been predicted by density wave models, along with the observation that the galactic longitude of each spiral arm tracer (dust, cold CO) for each spiral arm becomes reversed across the Galactic Meridian (Vallée 2016b). 1. Introduction The value of the distance of the Sun to the Galactic Center, Rsun , is one of the fundamental parameters of our Milky Way disk galaxy. Similarly, the value of the circular orbital velocity Vlsr, for the Local Standard of Rest at radius Rsun around the Galactic Center, is another fundamental parameter. In 1985, the IAU recommended the use of Rsun =8.5 kpc and Vlsr = 220 km/s. Recent measurements of Rsun and Vlsr deviate somewhat from this IAU recommendation. Section 2 makes a table of recent measurements of two galactic constants, namely the distance of the Sun to the Galactic Center, and the orbital circular velocity near the Sun around the Galactic Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way Galaxy
    TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay GalaxyGalaxy Daniela Carollo RSAA-Mount Stromlo Observatory-Australia Lecture N. 1 The Milky Way from the Death Valley InIn thisthis lecture:lecture: General characteristic of the Milky Way Reference Systems Astrometry Galactic Structures TheThe MilkyMilky WayWay Why it is so important? We live in the Milky Way! Our Galaxy is like a laboratory , it can be studied in unique detail. We can recognize its structures, and study the stellar populations. We can infer its formation and evolution using the tracers of its oldest part: the Halo Near field cosmology If we could see the Milky Way from the outside it might looks like our closest neighbor, the Andromeda Galaxy. NGC 2997 Face on view • We live at edge of disk • Disadvantage: structure obscured by “dust”. It is very difficult to observe towards the center of the Galaxy due to the strong absorption. • Advantage: can study motions of nearby stars COBE Near IR View Reference Systems Equatorial Coordinate System From Binney and Merrifield, Galactic Astronomy . Some definitions: Celestial sphere: an imaginary sphere of infinite radius centered on the Earth NCP and SCP: the extension of the Earth’s axis to the celestial sphere define the Nord and South Celestial Poles. The extension of the Earth’s Equatorial Plane determine the Celestial Equator Great Circle: a circle on the celestial sphere defined by the intersection of a plane passing through the sphere center, and the surface of the sphere. The great circle through the celestial poles and a star’s position is that star hour circle Zenith: that point at which the extended vertical line intersects the celestial sphere Meridian: great circle passing through the celestial poles and the zenith The earth rotates at an approximately constant rate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars?
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. main ©ESO 2020 December 2, 2020 Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration, R.L. Smart 1??, L.M. Sarro 2, J. Rybizki 3, C. Reylé 4, A.C. Robin 4, N.C. Hambly 5, U. Abbas 1, M.A. Barstow 6, J.H.J. de Bruijne 7, B. Bucciarelli 1, J.M. Carrasco 8, W.J. Cooper 9; 1, S.T. Hodgkin 10, E. Masana 8, D. Michalik 7, J. Sahlmann 11, A. Sozzetti 1, A.G.A. Brown 12, A. Vallenari 13, T. Prusti 7, C. Babusiaux 14; 15, M. Biermann16, O.L. Creevey 17, D.W. Evans 10, L. Eyer 18, A. Hutton19, F. Jansen7, C. Jordi 8, S.A. Klioner 20, U. Lammers 21, L. Lindegren 22, X. Luri 8, F. Mignard17, C. Panem23, D. Pourbaix 24; 25, S. Randich 26, P. Sartoretti15, C. Soubiran 27, N.A. Walton 10, F. Arenou 15, C.A.L. Bailer-Jones3, U. Bastian 16, M. Cropper 28, R. Drimmel 1, D. Katz 15, M.G. Lattanzi 1; 29, F. van Leeuwen10, J. Bakker21, J. Castañeda 30, F. De Angeli10, C. Ducourant 27, C. Fabricius 8, M. Fouesneau 3, Y. Frémat 31, R. Guerra 21, A. Guerrier23, J. Guiraud23, A. Jean-Antoine Piccolo23, R. Messineo32, N. Mowlavi18, C. Nicolas23, K. Nienartowicz 33; 34, F. Pailler23, P. Panuzzo 15, F. Riclet23, W. Roux23, G.M. Seabroke28, R. Sordo 13, P. Tanga 17, F. Thévenin17, G. Gracia-Abril35; 16, J. Portell 8, D. Teyssier 36, M. Altmann 16; 37, R. Andrae3, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 162 Lecture 1 Patrick S
    Astronomy 162 Lecture 1 Patrick S. Osmer Spring 2006 • INTRODUCE SELF, T.As • ASK STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES, INTERESTS • HOW MANY TOOK Ay161 LAST QUARTER? • HOW MANY WORK? • ASK ABOUT IF THEY HEARD ABOUT RECENT HST, CHANDRA, AND SPITZER SPACE TELESCOPE RESULTS A SURVEY • WHY ARE YOU TAKING THIS COURSE? • WHAT DO YOU HOPE TO LEARN? • DO YOU FIND SCIENCE INTERESTING? • WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE TEXTBOOK? E-MAIL AND THE WORLD WIDE WEB • NOTE THAT LECTURE NOTES AND COURSE INFORMATION WILL BE POSTED ON THE WEB SITE FOR THE COURSE: www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~posmer/Ay162/ index.html • INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE, SO KEEP CHECKING THE WEB SITE • COME TO CLASS!! I cannot guarantee that everything I say will be on the web notes. PURPOSE OF A LECTURE • BACKGROUND • HISTORY • PERSONAL COMMENTS • CURRENT EVENTS Ay 162, Spring 2006 Week 1, part 1 p. 1 of 18 • TIE MATERIAL TOGETHER, BRING IT ALIVE • DESCRIBE HOW DISCOVERIES AND UNDERSTANDING OCCUR IN ASTRONOMY • PROVIDE MOTIVATION • MAYBE EVEN SOME HUMOR STUDY OF SCIENCE • SCIENCE IS: – THE COLLECTION OF FACTS AND OBSERVATION OF PHENOMENA – THE EFFORT TO FIND AN UNDERLYING ORDER AND UNDERSTANDING ASTRONOMY • THE STUDY OF THE UNIVERSE • FROM OUTSIDE THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE TO THE LIMIT OF OBSERVATION OBSERVATIONAL ASTRONOMY: • DISCOVERY OF COMPONENTS OF UNIVERSE (PLANETS, STARS, NEBULAE, BLACK HOLES, GALAXIES) • OBSERVING THEIR PROPERTIES • SURVEYING AND MAPPING THEIR DISTRIBUTION IN SPACE ASTROPHYSICS AND THEORY • UNDERSTANDING THE PHYSICAL PROCESSES OF THE OBJECTS IN THE UNIVERSE • DETERMINING THEIR COMPOSITIONS, ORIGINS, EVOLUTION, FINAL STATES Ay 162, Spring 2006 Week 1, part 1 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Rotation S&G Sec 2.3!
    Galactic Rotation S&G Sec 2.3! • The majority of the motions of the stars in the MW is rotational! • Prime way of measuring mass of spiral galaxies! • map out the distribution of galactic gas! • strong evidence for dark matter! 120! Galactic Rotation! • See SG 2.3, BM ch 3 B&T ch 2.6,2.7 B&T fig 1.3! and ch 6 ! • Coordinate system: define velocity vector by π,θ,z! π radial velocity wrt galactic center ! θ motion tangential to GC with positive values in direct of galactic rotation! z motion perpendicular to the plane, positive values toward North If the galaxy is axisymmetric galactic pole! and in steady state then each pt • origin is the galactic center (center or in the plane has a velocity mass/rotation) ! corresponding to a circular • Local standard of rest (BM pg 536)! velocity around center of mass • velocity of a test particle moving in of MW ! the plane of the MW on a closed orbit that passes thru the present position of (π,θ,z)LSR=(0,θ0,0) with! 121! the sun ! θ0 =θ0(R)! Local Standard of Rest The Sun (and most stars) are on slightly perturbed orbits that resemble rosettes making it difficult to measure relative motions of stars around the Sun.! ! Establish a reference frame that is a perfect circular orbit about the Galactic Center.! Local Standard of Rest - reference frame for measuring velocities in the Galaxy. Position of the Sun if its motion were completely governed by circular motion around the Galaxy. Use cylindrical coordinates for the Galactic plane to define the Sun’s motion w.r.t the Local Standard of Rest Coordinate
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia Early Data Release 3 Special Issue Gaia Early Data Release 3 the Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration: R
    A&A 649, A6 (2021) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039498 & © ESO 2021 Astrophysics Gaia Early Data Release 3 Special issue Gaia Early Data Release 3 The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars? Gaia Collaboration: R. L. Smart1,??, L. M. Sarro2, J. Rybizki3, C. Reylé4, A. C. Robin4, N. C. Hambly5, U. Abbas1, M. A. Barstow6, J. H. J. de Bruijne7, B. Bucciarelli1, J. M. Carrasco8, W. J. Cooper9,1, S. T. Hodgkin10, E. Masana8, D. Michalik7, J. Sahlmann11, A. Sozzetti1, A. G. A. Brown12, A. Vallenari13, T. Prusti7, C. Babusiaux14,15, M. Biermann16, O. L. Creevey17, D. W. Evans10, L. Eyer18, A. Hutton19, F. Jansen7, C. Jordi8, S. A. Klioner20, U. Lammers21, L. Lindegren22, X. Luri8, F. Mignard17, C. Panem23, D. Pourbaix24,25, S. Randich26, P. Sartoretti15, C. Soubiran27, N. A. Walton10, F. Arenou15, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones3, U. Bastian16, M. Cropper28, R. Drimmel1, D. Katz15, M. G. Lattanzi1,29, F. van Leeuwen10, J. Bakker21, J. Castañeda30, F. De Angeli10, C. Ducourant27, C. Fabricius8, M. Fouesneau3, Y. Frémat31, R. Guerra21, A. Guerrier23, J. Guiraud23, A. Jean-Antoine Piccolo23, R. Messineo32, N. Mowlavi18, C. Nicolas23, K. Nienartowicz33,34, F. Pailler23, P. Panuzzo15, F. Riclet23, W. Roux23, G. M. Seabroke28, R. Sordo13, P. Tanga17, F. Thévenin17, G. Gracia-Abril35,16, J. Portell8, D. Teyssier36, M. Altmann16,37, R. Andrae3, I. Bellas-Velidis38, K. Benson28, J. Berthier39, R. Blomme31, E. Brugaletta40, P. W. Burgess10, G. Busso10, B. Carry17, A. Cellino1, N. Cheek41, G. Clementini42, Y. Damerdji43,44, M. Davidson5, L. Delchambre43, A. Dell’Oro26, J. Fernández-Hernández45, L. Galluccio17, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Table
    PREFACE: Scope and purpose of this essay This online essay is an extended version of the essay in the printed-edition Handbook, containing all the material of its printed-edition accompaniment, but adding material of its own. The accompanying online table is likewise an extended version of the printed-edition table, (a) with extra stars (after providing for multiplicity, as we explain below, the brightest MK-classified 322, allowing for variability, where the printed edition has almost 30 fewer, allowing for variability: our cutoff is mag. ~3.55), and (b) with additional remarks for most of the duplicated stars. We use a dagger superscript (†) to mark data cells for which the online table supplies some additional information, some context, or a caveat. The online essay and table try to address the needs of three kinds of serious amateur: amateurs who are also astrophysics students (whether or not enrolled formally at some campus); amateurs who, like many in RASC, assist in public outreach, through some form of lecturing; and amateurs who are planning their own private citizen-science observing runs, in the spirit of such “pro-am” organizations as AAVSO. Additionally, we would hope that the online project will help serve a constituency of sky-lovers, whether professional or amateur, who work with the heavens in an unambitious and contemplative spirit, seeking to understand at the eyepiece, or even with the naked eye, the realities behind the little that their limited circumstances may allow them to see. (This is the same contemplative exercise as is proposed for the Cyg X-1 black hole, with its gas-dumping supergiant companion HD226868, in the Handbook printed-editions “Expired Stars” essay: with a small telescope, or even with binoculars, we first find HD226868, and then take a moment to ponder in awe the accompanying unobserved realities of gas-fed hot accretion disk, event horizon, and spacetime singularity.) Our online project, started as a supplement to the 2017 Handbook, must be considered still in its rather early stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Kinematics in the Galaxy: Reference Frames
    The motions of stars in the Galaxy • The stars in the Galaxy define various components, that do not only differ in their spatial distribution but also in their kinematics. • The dominant motion of stars (and gas) in the Galactic disk is rotation (around the centre of the Galaxy), and these motions occur on nearly circular orbits. • The stars in the thick disk, rotate more slowly than those in the thin disk. Their random motions are slightly larger. • The stars in the halo, however, do not rotate in an orderly fashion, their random motions are large, and their orbits are rather elongated. • Questions we will address today: How do we know this? How can we determine the rotational speed of the nearby disk? How can we best describe the motions of the stars in the different components? Stellar kinematics and reference frames The fundamental Galactic reference frame: is the most important from the point of view of galactic dynamics. It is centered on the galaxy’s centre of mass. The velocity of a star in this reference frame is often given in cylindrical coordinates (Π,Θ,Z) (or (VR, Vφ, Vz)) where •Π: is along the radial direction (in the Galactic plane), and positive outwards (l=180, b=0) •Θ: is in the tangential direction (in the Galactic plane), positive in the direction of galactic rotation (l=90, b=0) •Z: is perpendicular to the galactic plane, and positive northwards The local standard of rest •We define a reference system on the Galactic plane that is moving on a circular orbit around the Galactic centre, as a local standard of rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Rotation and Solar Motion
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–15 (2012) Printed 16 July 2012 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Galactic Rotation and Solar Motion from Stellar Kinematics Ralph Sch¨onrich1,2⋆ 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Garching, Germany 2 Hubble Fellow, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 accepted July 2nd, 2012 ABSTRACT I present three methods to determine the distance to the Galactic centre R0, the solar azimuthal velocity in the Galactic rest frame Vg,⊙ and hence the local circular speed Vc at R0. These simple, model-independent strategies reduce the set of assumptions to near axisymmetry of the disc and are designed for kinematically hot stars, which are less affected by spiral arms and other effects. The first two methods use the position-dependent rotational streaming in the heliocentric radial velocities (U). The resulting rotation estimate θ from U velocities does not depend on Vg,⊙. The first approach compares this with rotation from the galactic azimuthal velocities to constrain Vg,⊙ at an assumed R0. Both Vg,⊙ and R0 can be determined using the proper motion of Sgr A∗ as a second constraint. The second strategy makes use of θ being roughly proportional to R0. Therefore a wrong R0 can be detected by an unphysical trend of Vg,⊙ with the intrinsic rotation of different populations. From these two strategies I estimate R0 = (8.27 ± 0.29)kpc −1 and Vg,⊙ = (250 ± 9)kms for a stellar sample from SEGUE, or respectively Vc = (238 ± 9)kms−1. The result is consistent with the third estimator, where I use the angle of the mean motion of stars, which should follow the geometry of the Galactic disc.
    [Show full text]