Our Place in the Milky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Place in the Milky Astronomy 218 Our Place in the Milky Way Orbiting Sun The Sun’s proper motion relative to the Galactic center, μ” = 5.8 milliarcseconds yr−1 = 2.8 × 10−8 rad yr−1 and its distance from the Galactic center, R0 = 8 kpc, indicate an −1 −1 orbital velocity of �0 = 225 kpc Gyr = 220 km s . The Sun’s orbital period around the Galactic Center is then = 0.22 Gyr Maintaining this orbit requires that the mass inside of the Sun’s orbit must be 10 = 9.3 × 10 M☉ This 93 billion M☉ for the inner galaxy compares to 23 billion L☉, indicating that the galaxy’s M/L > M☉/L☉. Spiral Arms Measurements of the position and motion of gas clouds throughout the Milky Way reveals that the solar environment includes several spiral arms. Scutum-Centaurus Arm Norma Arm Sagittarius Arm Central Bar Orion Spur Perseus Arm Outer Arm Galactic Coordinates The Galactic plane defines a galactic coordinate system, in the same way the Equator defines the terrestrial latitude and longitude. The line from the Sun to Sagittarius A* defines the zero of galactic longitude, ℓ, which increases counter-clockwise viewed from the north. The galactic latitude, b, is measured from the plane of the galaxy to the object using the Sun as vertex. Differential Rotation One interpretation of the spiral arms would be the winding up of an initial linear pattern. However, the differential rotation of the galaxy would have wound up the spiral pattern so tightly that it would effectively disappear, contrary to observations. Thus the spiral arms are not tied to disk material. Density Waves Instead spiral arms are density waves, similar to the over density of cars in a traffic jam. The jam persists even though individual cars move steadily through it. Such density waves persist long after the event that triggered them is forgotten. In the case of galaxies, the waves are regions of locally higher density, which accelerate stars into them and decelerate them as they leave, perpetuating the over density. Spiral Star Formation Not just the density of stars becomes enhanced as they move through the spiral arms, but clouds of gas and dust are actually compressed. Their increased density triggers star formation. This affects the propagation of spiral arms as the formation of stars leads to supernovae and stellar winds which further compress the gas and dust, leading to waves of ongoing star formation. Spiral Lights It is this ongoing star formation which makes the spiral arms so visible. Newly formed massive stars, and their attendant HII regions and supernova remnants, line the spiral arms, shining bright and dying before leaving the arm. In contrast, older stars move through the arms and have a smoother angular distribution. As one moves to progressively longer wavelengths, the spiral arms become less noticeable. The actual over-density is small, only a few %. Orion Spur The Orion Spur is also referred to as the Orion-Cygnus Arm or the Orion Arm. The Sun sits near the center of the Local Bubble, close to the inner rim of the arm, Facing in the leading direction points in the direction of Deneb and the constellation Cygnus. Facing in the trailing direction points toward Betelgeuse and the constellation Orion. Local Stellar Motions We can measure the relative motions of nearby �t � stars in two steps. r � The space velocity � can be decomposed into 2 components, relative to the line of sight. The radial component, �r, along the line of μ d sight, can be measured by doppler shift. The tangential (or transverse) component, �t, across the line of sight, can be measured by proper motion, μ. To achieve the desired accuracy, these measurements must be −1 corrected for the Earth’s orbital velocity (�orb ≈ 30 km s ) −1 and the Earth’s rotational velocity (�rot ≈ 0.5 km s ), as well as any binary motions of the distant star. 6.3. STELLAR MOTIONS 137 Figure 6.11: Components of a star’s velocity relative to the Sun. itself. This can be done by averaging the radial velocity of the star over an entire orbital period. The radial velocity of forty stellar systems within 5 parsecs of the Sun is Localplotted Radialin Figure 6.12. Notice aVelocityfew interesting results: Examination of the radial velocities of 200 ] s the 40 stars closest / 100 m k [ to the Sun, d < 5 r v 0 pc, results in this figure. −100 The number of 1 2 3 4 5 d [pc] redshifted stars approximately equals theFigure number6.12: Radial ofv eloblueshiftedcity of stars within stars.5 pc of the Sun. Kapteyn’s star, at a •distanceThe radial vofelo cities3.9 shopcw, isappro a ximatelynoticeableequal n umoutlier,bers of blueshifts with a velocity of 250(v rkm< 0) sand−1 redshiftsaway (fromvr > 0). the Sun. • There is one notable outlier on the plot: Kapteyn’s star, alias CD- Ignoring Kapteyn’s star,45◦1841, thealias root-mean-squareGliese 191, which is mo velocityving away from the Sun with dispersion is ~ 35 km s−1 in radial velocity. Proper Motion Measuring the motion of a star across the line of sight is much more time-consuming than measuring the radial velocity via the Doppler Shift. Time must pass for the star to move perceptively on the sky. In the small angle limit, the proper motion μ = �t/d. If μ is measured in rad yr−1 and d in parsecs, μ is more naturally measured in arcseconds yr−1, with 1 radian −1 = 206,265 arcseconds. Comparison of �t to �r favors km s with 1 pc yr−1 = 976,582 km s−1. Simplifying 140 CHAPTER 6. OUR GALAXY For Barnard’s Star, as an example, 10.358 −1 −1 vt = 4.74 km s = 89.8 km s . (6.24) ! 0.547 " The tangential velocity of stellar systems within 5 parsecs of the Sun is shown Local Tangentialin Figure 6.14. The high proper motion Velocityof Barnard’s Star is due both to the Examination of the 150 tangential velocities ] s / of the 40 stars m 100 k [ t closest to the Sun v 50 results in this figure. 0 The red line marks 1 2 3 4 5 μ = 5 arcsec yr−1. d [pc] Figure 6.14: Tangential velocity of stars within 5 pc of the Sun. Stars above Again Kapteyn’s starthe dotted showsline hait’sve µuniqueness"" > 5 arcsec yr−1. with a large ʋt −1 producing a large factproperthat it motion,is very close toμ us= and8.7to arcsecthe fact that yrits tangential velocity is higher than the average for nearby stars. Barnard’s star, despiteIf the itsav eragesmallertangen tialtangentialvelocity vt do velocity,esn’t vary with hasdistance the from the Sun, then on average, nearby stars will−1 have a higher proper motion than highest proper motion,more distan μ t=stars. 10.4One arcsecway to searc yrh for. nearby stars, if you don’t have the time or patience to measure parallaxes for every star in the sky, is to start −1 61 Cygni, μ = 5.2 barcsecy looking atyrstars, withhashigh theprop highester motion. properThe history motionbooks state that in the year 1838, Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel measured the parallax of 61 Cygni. of any star visible Whatto thethey nakedsometimes eye.don’t tell you is why Bessel chose that star to observe: it is, after all, a humble fifth magnitude star. Bessel, in fact, chose 61 Cygni because it has the highest proper motion of any star visible to the naked eye, µ"" = 5.2 arcsec yr−1.12 Of course, any star, no matter its distance, will have 12The unusual nature of Kapteyn’s Star was first recognized in the year 1897, when this otherwise boring M dwarf was found to have a proper motion of nearly 9 arcseconds per year. At the time, this was the largest proper motion known, defeated only when E. E. Barnard measured the proper motion of Barnard’s Star in 1916. 6.4. LOCAL STANDARD OF REST 141 zero proper motion if it’s moving straight toward us or straight away from us. An example of a nearby star with small proper motion is Gliese 710, which −1 "" −1 has vr = −13.9 km s and µ = 0.014 arcsec yr . At the moment, Gliese 710 is over 19 parsecs away from us, and has mV = 9.7. In 1.4 Myr, however, is will be only 0.34 parsecs away (about a fourth the present distance to Proxima Centauri) and have mV = 0.9. Putting it all together, the total speed relative to the Sun, 2 2 1/2 v = (vr + vt ) , (6.25) is called the “space motion” or “space velocity”. A plot of the space motion Local forSpacenearby stars (Figure 6.15)Velocityreveals that Kapteyn’s Star again stands out Combining the 300 radial and tangential ] s velocities for the 40 / 200 m k [ closest stars reveals that 39/40 belong to v 100 a group with a mean 0 relative velocity � ~ 1 2 3 4 5 50 km s−1. d [pc] These velocities willFigure rearrange6.15: Space theirvelocity proximityof stars within 5topc theof the SunSun. onThe outliera at −1 timescale of t ~ 5 pcd ≈/ 503.9 p cpc, v ≈Myr300 km−1s ~is 0.1Kapteyn’s Myrstar.. For example, Gliese 710, currentlylik e19the propcv erbialaway,sore willthumb. passIts space withinmotion ⅓of v pc≈ 300 inkm 1.4s−1 is twice that of Barnard’s Star, the next speediest star in the solar neighborhood. The Myr, brightening fromaverage mspacev = motion9.7 toof stars0.9.within 5 parsecs of the Sun is v ∼ 50 km s−1 ∼ 50 pc Myr−1.
Recommended publications
  • Eclipse Newsletter
    ECLIPSE NEWSLETTER The Eclipse Newsletter is dedicated to increasing the knowledge of Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology and related subjects. VOLUMN 2 NUMBER 1 JANUARY – FEBRUARY 2018 PLEASE SEND ALL PHOTOS, QUESTIONS AND REQUST FOR ARTICLES TO [email protected] 1 MCAO PUBLIC NIGHTS AND FAMILY NIGHTS. The general public and MCAO members are invited to visit the Observatory on select Monday evenings at 8PM for Public Night programs. These programs include discussions and illustrated talks on astronomy, planetarium programs and offer the opportunity to view the planets, moon and other objects through the telescope, weather permitting. Due to limited parking and seating at the observatory, admission is by reservation only. Public Night attendance is limited to adults and students 5th grade and above. If you are interested in making reservations for a public night, you can contact us by calling 302-654- 6407 between the hours of 9 am and 1 pm Monday through Friday. Or you can email us any time at [email protected] or [email protected]. The public nights will be presented even if the weather does not permit observation through the telescope. The admission fees are $3 for adults and $2 for children. There is no admission cost for MCAO members, but reservations are still required. If you are interested in becoming a MCAO member, please see the link for membership. We also offer family memberships. Family Nights are scheduled from late spring to early fall on Friday nights at 8:30PM. These programs are opportunities for families with younger children to see and learn about astronomy by looking at and enjoying the sky and its wonders.
    [Show full text]
  • SEDIGISM-ATLASGAL: Dense Gas Fraction and Star Formation Efficiency Across the Galactic Disk
    MNRAS 000,1– ?? (2020) Preprint 4 December 2020 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 SEDIGISM-ATLASGAL: Dense Gas Fraction and Star Formation Efficiency Across the Galactic Disk?† J. S. Urquhart1‡, C. Figura2, J. R. Cross1, M. R. A. Wells1, T. J. T. Moore3, D. J. Eden3, S. E. Ragan4, A. R. Pettitt5, A. Duarte-Cabral4, D. Colombo6, F. Schuller7;6, T. Csengeri8, M. Mattern9;6, H. Beuther10, K. M. Menten6, F. Wyrowski6, L. D. Anderson11;12;13, P.J. Barnes14, M. T. Beltrán15, S. J. Billington1, L. Bronfman16, A. Giannetti17, J. Kainulainen18, J. Kauffmann19 , M.-Y.Lee20, S. Leurini21, S.-N. X. Medina6, F. M. Montenegro22, M. Riener10, A. J. Rigby4, A. Sánchez-Monge23, P.Schilke23, E. Schisano24, A. Traficante24, M. Wienen25 Affiliations can be found after the references. Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT By combining two surveys covering a large fraction of the molecular material in the Galactic disk we investigate the role the spiral arms play in the star formation process. We have matched clumps identified by ATLASGAL with their parental GMCs as identified by SEDIGISM, and use these giant molecular cloud (GMC) masses, the bolometric luminosi- ties, and integrated clump masses obtained in a concurrent paper to estimate the dense gas fractions (DGFgmc = ∑Mclump=Mgmc) and the instantaneous star forming efficiencies (i.e., SFEgmc = ∑Lclump=Mgmc). We find that the molecular material associated with ATLASGAL clumps is concentrated in the spiral arms (∼60 per cent found within ±10 km s−1 of an arm). We have searched for variations in the values of these physical parameters with respect to their proximity to the spiral arms, but find no evidence for any enhancement that might be attributable to the spiral arms.
    [Show full text]
  • 13076197 Tanvir Tabassum Final Version of Submission.Pdf
    Finding Close Encounters: Toward a consensus on the influence of the stellar flybys on the Solar System over 10 million years Supervised by: Author: Dr Fabo Feng Tabassum Shahriar Tanvir Dr James L Collett Professor Hugh Jones Centre for Astrophysics Research School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics University of Hertfordshire Submitted to the University of Hertfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science by Research. October 2018 Abstract This thesis is a study of possible stellar encounters of the Sun, both in the past and in the future within ±10 Myr of the current epoch. This study is based on data gleaned from the first Gaia data release (Gaia DR1). One of the components of the Gaia DR1 is the TGAS catalogue. TGAS contained five astrometric parameters for more than two million stars. Four separate catalogues were used to provide radial velocities for these stars. A linear motion approximation was used to make a cut within an initial catalogue keeping only the stars that would have perihelia within 10 pc. 1003 stars were found to have a perihelion distance less than 10 pc. Each of these stars was then cloned 1000 times from their covariance matrix from Gaia DR1. The stars’ orbits were numerically integrated through a model galactic potential. After the integration, a particularly interesting set of candidates was selected for deeper study. In particular stars with a mean perihelion distance less than 2 pc were chosen for a deeper study since they will have significant influence on the Oort cloud. 46 stars were found to have a mean perihelion distance less than 2 pc.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1907.03763V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 8 Jul 2019 Keywords: Galaxy: Disk — Galaxy: Kinematics and Dynamics — Galaxy: Solar Neighborhood — Galaxy: Structure
    Draft version July 10, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Stellar Overdensity in the Local Arm in Gaia DR2 Yusuke Miyachi,1 Nobuyuki Sakai,2, 3 Daisuke Kawata,4 Junichi Baba,5 Mareki Honma,2, 6, 7 Noriyuki Matsunaga,8 and Kenta Fujisawa1 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Yamaguchi University, Yoshida 1677-1, Yamaguchi-city, Yamaguchi 753-8512, Japan 2Mizusawa VLBI observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 3Korea Astronomy & Space Science Institute, 776, Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34055, Korea 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, UK 5National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 6Mizusawa VLBI observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-12 Hoshi-ga-oka-cho, Mizusawa-ku, Oshu, Iwate 023-0861, Japan 7The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 8Department of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (Received March 31, 2019; Revised June 17, 2019; Accepted July 2, 2019) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Using the cross-matched data of Gaia DR2 and 2MASS Point Source Catalog, we investigated the surface density distribution of stars aged 1 Gyr in the thin disk in the range of 90◦ l 270◦. We ∼ ≤ ≤ selected 4,654 stars above the turnoff corresponding to the age 1 Gyr, that fall within a small box ∼ region in the color{magnitude diagram, (J K ) versus M(K ), for which the distance and reddening − s 0 s are corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Depth Study of Photometric Variability and Radiative Timescales for Atmospheric Evolution in Four L Dwarfs
    Weather on Other Worlds IV: In-Depth Study of Photometric Variability and Radiative Timescales for Atmospheric Evolution in Four L Dwarfs Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Flateau, Davin C. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 07:25:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/594630 WEATHER ON OTHER WORLDS IV: IN-DEPTH STUDY OF PHOTOMETRIC VARIABILITY AND RADIATIVE TIMESCALES FOR ATMOSPHERIC EVOLUTION IN FOUR L DWARFS by Davin C. Flateau A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF PLANETARY SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2015 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Astronomy and Cosmology Outline 1
    ELEMENTS OF ASTRONOMY AND COSMOLOGY OUTLINE 1. The Solar System The Four Inner Planets The Asteroid Belt The Giant Planets The Kuiper Belt 2. The Milky Way Galaxy Neighborhood of the Solar System Exoplanets Star Terminology 3. The Early Universe Twentieth Century Progress Recent Progress 4. Observation Telescopes Ground-Based Telescopes Space-Based Telescopes Exploration of Space 1 – The Solar System The Solar System - 4.6 billion years old - Planet formation lasted 100s millions years - Four rocky planets (Mercury Venus, Earth and Mars) - Four gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) Figure 2-2: Schematics of the Solar System The Solar System - Asteroid belt (meteorites) - Kuiper belt (comets) Figure 2-3: Circular orbits of the planets in the solar system The Sun - Contains mostly hydrogen and helium plasma - Sustained nuclear fusion - Temperatures ~ 15 million K - Elements up to Fe form - Is some 5 billion years old - Will last another 5 billion years Figure 2-4: Photo of the sun showing highly textured plasma, dark sunspots, bright active regions, coronal mass ejections at the surface and the sun’s atmosphere. The Sun - Dynamo effect - Magnetic storms - 11-year cycle - Solar wind (energetic protons) Figure 2-5: Close up of dark spots on the sun surface Probe Sent to Observe the Sun - Distance Sun-Earth = 1 AU - 1 AU = 150 million km - Light from the Sun takes 8 minutes to reach Earth - The solar wind takes 4 days to reach Earth Figure 5-11: Space probe used to monitor the sun Venus - Brightest planet at night - 0.7 AU from the
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 10 Milky Way II
    Measuring Structure of the Galaxy • To invert the measured distribution of stars One needs to make a lot – A(m,l,b): # of stars at an of 'corrections' the biggest one apparent mag m, at galactic is due to extinction so one coordinates l,b per sq degree does not repeat Herschel's error! per unit mag. – N(m,l,b): cumulative # of stars with mag < m, at galactic coordinates l,b per sq degree per unit mag. N(m,l,b)=∫ A(m',l,b) dm Into a true 3-D structure 36 Need to Measure Extinction Accurately 37 APOGEE Results • Metallicity across the Milky Way • An example of the fine grain knowledge now being obtained. 38 Gaia Capability • Gaia will survey ~1/4 of the MW (Luri and Robin) 39 Early GAIA Results • Proper motions in the M67 star cluster-accuracies of ~5mas/year (5x10-9 radians/year or 4.3x10-5 pc/year (42 km/sec- 2.5x the speed of the earth around the sun) at distance of M67 ) 40 MW II • Use of gas (HI) to trace velocity field and thus mass of the disk (discuss a bit of the geometry details in the next lecture) – dependence on distance to center of MW • properties of MW (e.g. mass of components) • Cosmic Rays – only directly observable in MW • Start of dynamics 41 Timescales 7 • crossing time tc=2R/σ∼5x10 yrs (R10kpc/v200) • dynamical time td=sqrt(3π/16Gρ)- related to the orbital time; assumption homogenous sphere of density ρ • Relaxation time- the time for a system to 'forget' its initial conditions S+G (eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Meteorology: Characterizing the Atmospheres Of
    Exoplanet Meteorology: Characterizing the Atmospheres of Directly Imaged Sub-Stellar Objects by Abhijith Rajan A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2017 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Jennifer Patience, Co-Chair Patrick Young, Co-Chair Paul Scowen Nathaniel Butler Evgenya Shkolnik ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2017 ©2017 Abhijith Rajan All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The field of exoplanet science has matured over the past two decades with over 3500 confirmed exoplanets. However, many fundamental questions regarding the composition, and formation mechanism remain unanswered. Atmospheres are a window into the properties of a planet, and spectroscopic studies can help resolve many of these questions. For the first part of my dissertation, I participated in two studies of the atmospheres of brown dwarfs to search for weather variations. To understand the evolution of weather on brown dwarfs we conducted a multi- epoch study monitoring four cool brown dwarfs to search for photometric variability. These cool brown dwarfs are predicted to have salt and sulfide clouds condensing in their upper atmosphere and we detected one high amplitude variable. Combining observations for all T5 and later brown dwarfs we note a possible correlation between variability and cloud opacity. For the second half of my thesis, I focused on characterizing the atmospheres of directly imaged exoplanets. In the first study Hubble Space Telescope data on HR8799, in wavelengths unobservable from the ground, provide constraints on the presence of clouds in the outer planets. Next, I present research done in collaboration with the Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey (GPIES) team including an exploration of the instrument contrast against environmental parameters, and an examination of the environment of the planet in the HD 106906 system.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Drag Interstellar Objects and Galactic Dynamical Streams
    Draft version March 25, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 High-Drag Interstellar Objects And Galactic Dynamical Streams T.M. Eubanks1 1Space Initiatives Inc, Clifton, Virginia 20124 (Received; Revised March 25, 2019; Accepted) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT The nature of 1I/’Oumuamua (henceforth, 1I), the first interstellar object known to pass through the solar system, remains mysterious. Feng & Jones noted that the incoming 1I velocity vector “at infinity” (v∞) is close to the motion of the Pleiades dynamical stream (or Local Association), and suggested that 1I is a young object ejected from a star in that stream. Micheli et al. subsequently detected non-gravitational acceleration in the 1I trajectory; this acceleration would not be unusual in an active comet, but 1I observations failed to reveal any signs of activity. Bialy & Loeb hypothesized that the anomalous 1I acceleration was instead due to radiation pressure, which would require an extremely low mass-to-area ratio (or area density). Here I show that a low area density can also explain the very close kinematic association of 1I and the Pleiades stream, as it renders 1I subject to drag capture by interstellar gas clouds. This supports the radiation pressure hypothesis and suggests that there is a significant population of low area density ISOs in the Galaxy, leading, through gas drag, to enhanced ISO concentrations in the galactic dynamical streams. Any interstellar object entrained in a dynamical stream will have a predictable incoming v∞; targeted deep surveys using this information should be able to find dynamical stream objects months to as much as a year before their perihelion, providing the lead time needed for fast-response missions for the future in situ exploration of such objects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Milky Way
    Astronomy Cast Episode 99: The Milky Way Fraser Cain: Ninety-nine episodes Pamela! Dr. Pamela Gay: I know [Laughter] it’s amazing how far and how long we’ve been doing this. Fraser: The Milky Way is our home galaxy but we’ve only understood its true nature for about a century. We share this beautiful barred spiral galaxy with at least 200 billion other stars. Let’s trace back the history, see how we learned about the Milky Way and then compare it to other galaxies out there. What does the future hold for the Milky Way? Pamela: The future holds death, because that’s kinda what happens in the Universe. [Laughter] Fraser: Shhh….we’re supposed to keep that as a surprise! It all ends in tears. But, let’s go back to the beginning. [Laughter] I find that kinda interesting. My dad had an antique book about Astronomy. It had all the constellations and stuff. It was back from like the 1920s or earlier. It had nebula for the Andromeda nebula and other stuff. Let’s go back like as far as we can and talk a bit about the history of the Milky Way. You could see the Milky Way in the night sky so people knew that there was something there. What did they think was going on? Pamela: Well the term Milky Way is actually derived from a Latin term. We’ve had that name for it for a long time. It basically comes from the fact that there is this band of light that to the naked eye is perceived as this light patch, this illuminated patch that spreads in an arc across the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Maryland Department of Physics and Astronomy
    PROPAGATION OF COSMIC RAYS IN THE GALAXY R. R. Daniel Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay, India and S. A. Stephens* Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Maryland and Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, U.S.A. Technical Report No. 75-028 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND (NASA-CR-141190) PROPAGATION OF COSMIC RAYS N75-15580 IN THE GALAXY (Maryland Univ.) 208 p HC $7.25 CSCL 03B Unclas G3/93 05074 This is a preprint of research carried out at the University of Maryland. In order to promote the active exchange of research results, individuals and groups at your institution are encouraged to send their preprints to PREPRINT LIBRARY DEPARTMENT 'OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND 20742 U.S.A. PROPAGATION OF COSMIC RAYS IN THE GALAXY R. R. Daniel Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay, India and S. A. Stephens* Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Maryland and Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, U.S.A. Technical Report No. 75-028 To appear in Space Science Reviews *on leave from Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1. Models of cosmic ray confinement 1.2. The galactic model for cosmic ray confinement 1.3. Scope of the present review 2. General description of the Galaxy 2.1. Dimensions and density 2.2. Structure 2.3. Interstellar gas 2.4. Magnetic fields 2.5. Radiation fields 3. Cosmic ray propagation in the Galaxy: Theoretical aspects 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterschool Universe Session 9 Slide Notes: Galaxies
    This presentation supports the “Background” material in Session 9 of the Afterschool Universe program. This session is about galaxies. The picture shows the Whirlpool galaxy, a large, iconic, spiral galaxy. 1 Let us summarize the main concepts in this Session. We will discuss these in the rest of this presentation. 2 A galaxy is a huge collection of stars, gas and dust. A typical galaxy has about 100 billion stars (that’s 100,000,000,000 stars!), and light takes about 100,000 years to cross a galaxy (in other words, they are typically 100,000 light years ago). But some galaxies are much bigger and some are much smaller. 3 If you look at the sky from a DARK location, you can see a band of light stretching across the sky which is known as the Milky Way. This is our view of our Galaxy - more precisely, this is our view of the disk of our galaxy as seen from the INSIDE. 4 This picture shows another view of our galaxy taken in the infra-red part of the spectrum. The advantage of the infra-red is that it can penetrate the dust that pervades our galaxy’s disk and let us view the central parts of our galaxy. This picture also shows the full sky. The flat disk and central bulge of our galaxy can be seen in this picture. 5 We live in the suburbs of our galaxy. The Sun and its planetary system are about 25,000 light years from the center of the galaxy. This is about half way out to the edge of the disk.
    [Show full text]