• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Draft version July 10, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Stellar Overdensity in the Local Arm in Gaia DR2 Yusuke Miyachi,1 Nobuyuki Sakai,2, 3 Daisuke Kawata,4 Junichi Baba,5 Mareki Honma,2, 6, 7 Noriyuki Matsunaga,8 and Kenta Fujisawa1 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Yamaguchi University, Yoshida 1677-1, Yamaguchi-city, Yamaguchi 753-8512, Japan 2Mizusawa VLBI observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 3Korea Astronomy & Space Science Institute, 776, Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34055, Korea 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, UK 5National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 6Mizusawa VLBI observatory, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-12 Hoshi-ga-oka-cho, Mizusawa-ku, Oshu, Iwate 023-0861, Japan 7The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 8Department of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (Received March 31, 2019; Revised June 17, 2019; Accepted July 2, 2019) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Using the cross-matched data of Gaia DR2 and 2MASS Point Source Catalog, we investigated the surface density distribution of stars aged 1 Gyr in the thin disk in the range of 90◦ l 270◦. We ∼ ≤ ≤ selected 4,654 stars above the turnoff corresponding to the age 1 Gyr, that fall within a small box ∼ region in the color{magnitude diagram, (J K ) versus M(K ), for which the distance and reddening − s 0 s are corrected. The selected sample shows an arm-like overdensity at 90◦ l 190◦. This overdensity is ≤ ≤ located close to the Local arm traced by high-mass star forming regions (HMSFRs), but its pitch angle is slightly larger than that of the HMSFR-defined arm. Although the significance of the overdensity we report is marginal, its structure poses questions concerning both of the competing scenarios of spiral arms, the density-wave theory and the dynamic spiral arm model. The offset between the arms traced by stars and HMSFRs, i.e., gas, is difficult to be explained by the dynamic arm scenario. On the other hand, the pitch angle of the stellar Local arm, if confirmed, larger than that of the Perseus arm is difficult to be explained with the classical density-wave scenario. The dynamic arm scenario can explain it if the Local arm is in a growing up phase, while the Perseus arm is in a disrupting phase. Our result provides a new and complex picture of the Galactic spiral arms, and encourages further studies. arXiv:1907.03763v1 [astro-ph.GA] 8 Jul 2019 Keywords: Galaxy: disk | Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics | Galaxy: solar neighborhood | Galaxy: structure 1. INTRODUCTION lar neighborhood. Since then, many studies have re- Revealing the shapes of spiral arms in the Milky Way ported the characteristics of spiral arms in the Milky is a long-standing challenge in Galactic astronomy (e.g. Way (e.g., van de Hulst et al. 1954; Oort et al. 1958; Vall´ee 2017). First successful identification of spiral Georgelin & Georgelin 1976; Russeil 2003; Paladini et al. arms in the Milky Way has been made by Morgan et al. 2004; Hou & Han 2014). The well-known spiral arms (1952) from distributions of ionized hydrogen in the so- within a few kiloparsecs of the Sun are the Sagittarius- Carina arm and the Perseus arm. The Sagittarius- 2 Miyachi et al. Carina arm passes Galactic longitude of l = 0◦ inside The European Space Agency's Gaia mission (Gaia the solar radius, and the Perseus arm passes l = 180◦ Collaboration et al. 2016) has made their second data outside the solar radius. These features are revealed by release (Gaia DR2; Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018). a large number of gas and young stellar tracers, such as Gaia DR2 provides the position, parallax and proper O and early B stars, giant molecular clouds and H re- motions for 1:3 109 stars in the Milky Way (Lin- II ∼ × gions (Bok et al. 1970; Russeil 2003; Hou et al. 2009; Hou degren et al. 2018), and radial velocity for about 7 & Han 2014; Mongui´oet al. 2015). The Perseus arm is million stars (Soubiran et al. 2018) measured with Ra- also associated with the excess of older stars (Churchwell dial Velocity Spectrograph (RVS; Cropper et al. 2018). et al. 2009, and references therein). On the other hand, The precise measurement of the parallax for the bright such an excess of old stars has not been found around stars around the Local arm in Gaia DR2 enables us the Sagittarius arm (Benjamin et al. 2005). These lead to study the stellar distribution for a selected popula- to an ongoing debate that the Perseus arm could be tion of stars. In this paper, to answer the question if one of two major spiral arms in the Milky Way, while or not there is a stellar arm associated with the Local the Sagittarius-Carina arm is a minor gaseous spiral arm arm, we map the stellar density of a specific population (Drimmel 2000; Benjamin 2008; Churchwell et al. 2009). of stars with about 1 Gyr of age at 90 < l < 270◦. Spiral patterns in the Galactic plane are also traced by The 1 Gyr population is chosen, because they are sig- high-mass star-forming regions (HMSFRs) whose pre- nificantly older than the previously known Local arm cise parallaxes can be measured using Very Long Base- tracers and they are bright and more uniquely located in line Interferometry (VLBI; Reid et al. 2009; Honma et al. the Hertzsprung Russell (HR) diagram. Cross-matched − 2012; Reid & Honma 2014). More than 100 HMSFRs sample of Gaia DR2 stars with the Two Micron All Sky have been identified at the expected locations of the Survey Point Source Catalog (2MASS PSC; Skrutskie Sagittarius-Carina and Perseus arms (Reid et al. 2014). et al. 2006) are used to identify the population. We There is another closest spiral arm between the also evaluated the completeness of our selected sample Sagittarius-Carina and Perseus arms. This spiral arm against the 2MASS PSC, and confirmed that our sample is called the \Local arm" and also called the \Orion has reasonable completeness within the distance of 0.2 Arm" (van de Hulst et al. 1954; Georgelin & Georgelin and 1.3 kpc. 1976; Reid et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2016). The Local If the stellar arm is identified, the positional offset be- arm is identified with the neutral hydrogen gas, HII tween the gas and stellar arms, it would be interesting to regions, Cepheids, OB stars and HMSFRs (Walraven consider the origin of the spiral arm (Dobbs & Pringle et al. 1958; Bok 1959; Becker & Fenkart 1970; Hou & 2010; Baba et al. 2015; Egusa et al. 2017). Recently, Han 2014; Xu et al. 2016, 2018b). However, the features the origin of the spiral arms is hotly debated. There of the Local arm is not very clear, compared to the are two major competing scenarios for isolated spiral Sagittarius-Carina and Perseus arms. The Local arm is galaxies (see a review by Dobbs & Baba 2014). One often considered to be a branch-like features or a spur of them is a classical density-wave scenario, where the which bridges between the Sagittarius-Carina arm and spiral arms are considered to be long-lived and rigidly the Perseus arm (Oort & Muller 1952; Morgan et al. rotating density wave features (Lin & Shu 1964, 1966; 1953; van de Hulst et al. 1954; Kerr 1970; Kerr & Kerr Bertin & Lin 1996). The other one is a transient dy- 1970; Russeil 2003; Russeil et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2016, namic spiral arm scenario, which is commonly seen in 2018b). This infers that the Local arm is not a major N-body simulations of disk galaxies. In this scenario, spiral arm, but a secondary minor spiral feature, which the spiral arm is short-lived, transient and recurrent is just connected patchy star forming regions only traced (Sellwood & Carlberg 1984; Fujii et al. 2011; D'Onghia by gas and very young stars (Gum 1955; Bok 1959; Bok et al. 2013), and the arm is co-rotating and winding with et al. 1970; Kerr 1970; Georgelin & Georgelin 1976; Hou the stars at every radius (Wada et al. 2011; Grand et al. & Han 2014). However, a large number of HMSFRs are 2012a; Baba et al. 2013). This is also the case for barred observed in the Local arm, and the overall length (> spiral galaxy simulations (Baba et al. 2009; Grand et al. 5 kpc) identified with HMSFRs is substantial, which led 2012b; Baba 2015). In the density-wave scenario, the to a recent debate that the Local arm may be a major stellar arm is expected to have different degrees of off- spiral arm (Xu et al. 2013, 2016). If the Local arm is set from the gas arm at different radius (e.g. Fujimoto a major spiral arm, we should be able to identify the 1968; Roberts 1969; Gittins & Clarke 2004), and hence stellar overdensity of the Local arm, which has not been the gas and spiral arms have different pitch angles (e.g. observed, despite its being the closest spiral arm. Pour-Imani et al. 2016). On the other hand, the dy- namic spiral arm scenario predicts no systematic offset Stellar Local Arm 3 of the gas and stellar arms, because they are co-rotating number of this sample is 39,253,853 (Gaia DR2-2MASS with each other (Grand et al. 2012a; Kawata et al.

Load more

  11

Copy Link