DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Nuclear

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Nuclear UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Nuclear Debates and Political Competition in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: Denuclearization or Nuclear Latency in the aftermath of Fukushima DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by Alex Chang Lee Dissertation Committee: Professor Etel Solingen, Chair Associate Professor Caesar Sereseres Emeritus Professor Patrick M. Morgan 2019 © 2019 Alex Chang Lee DEDICATION To my parents Wan Shik Lee and Hyun Ae Ham and to the love of my life, Min Jin Chung and my darling children Tay Ha Lee and June Ha Lee ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF ACRONYMNS vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii CURRICULUM VITAE ix ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xii CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 Scope and Terminology 12 The Systematic Relationship between Nuclear Debates and Nuclear Spectrums 14 Political Segmentation and Competition 21 Research Design 31 Roadmap 36 CHAPTER 2: Altering Conditions and Competing Explanation 39 Shifting International and Domestic Conditions 40 Competing Explanations for the Nuclear Behavior in East Asia 47 Political Segmentation and Competition: Nuclear Debates 63 CHAPTER 3: Japan 71 Imperial Japan Era 75 Post-War or Pre-Fukushima Era 76 Post-Fukushima Era 100 Policy Implication: Nuclear Weapons Debate 117 Policy Implication: Nuclear Energy Debates 122 CHAPTER 4: South Korea 129 Post-World War II Era 134 The Third Republic of Korea to End of the Yushin System 141 Post-Yushin System and the Pre-Fukushima Era 152 Post-Fukushima Era 164 Policy Implication: Nuclear Weapons Debates 176 Policy Implication: Nuclear Energy Debates 187 CHAPTER 5: Taiwan 196 Period of Martial Law and Nuclear Program 199 Post Martial Law and the Pre-Fukushima Era 205 Post-Fukushima Era 208 Policy Implication: Nuclear Energy Debates 214 Policy Implication: Nuclear Weapons Debates 219 CHAPTER 6: Findings and Prospects 224 REFERENCES 241 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1: Nuclear Energy Spectrum Prior to Fukushima 16 Figure 1.2: Nuclear Weapons Spectrum Prior to Fukushima 18 Figure 1.3: 2011 Pre-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 20 Figure 1.4: 2018 Post-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum Expectation 21 Figure 1.5: Nuclear Policy Preference of Domestic Coalitions prior to the Fukushima Incident 22 Figure 1.6: Nuclear Decision-Making Process prior to Fukushima 23 Figure 2.1: Military Expenditure by Country in Northeast Asia 41 Figure 2.2: US Troop Levels in Japan and South Korea 1969-2016 43 Figure 2.3: Advancement of Civilian Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Orientation 56 Figure 3.1: The Nuclear Decision-Making Process of Japan Based on Three Phases 71 Figure 3.2: Japan‟s Pre-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 79 Figure 3.3: Japan‟s Participation in Nonproliferation Regimes and Activities 89 Figure 3.4: Nuclear Policy Preference of Domestic Coalition in Pre- and Post-Fukushima Era 102 Figure 3.5: How Should Japan Utilize Its Nuclear Power in the Future? 103 Figure 3.6: Japan‟s Post-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 104 Figure 3.7: Japan‟s Public Support for Nuclear Weapons 119 Figure 3.8: Could the Japanese Economy Grow Without Utilizing Nuclear Energy? 124 Figure 4.1: The Nuclear Decision-Making Process of South Korea Based on Three Phases 131 Figure 4.2: South Korea‟s Pre-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 141 Figure 4.3: South Korean Public Support for Nuclear Weapons 1996-2009 160 Figure 4.4: South Korea‟s Participation in Nonproliferation Regimes and Activities 163 Figure 4.5: Nuclear Policy Preference of Domestic Coalition in Pre- and Post-Fukushima Era 167 Figure 4.6: South Korea‟s Post-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 168 Figure 4.7 South Korean Public Support for Nuclear Weapons 1996-2017 179 iv Figure 5.1: The Nuclear Decision-Making Process of Taiwan Based on Three Phases 198 Figure 5.2: Taiwan Pre-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 201 Figure 5.3: Nuclear Policy Preference of Domestic Coalition in Pre- and Post-Fukushima Era 209 Figure 5.4: Taiwan‟s Post-Fukushima Nuclear Energy and Weapons Spectrum 211 Figure 6.1: Nuclear Policy Preference by Domestic Coalitions Post-Fukushima Incident 228 v LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1.1: Pre-Fukushima Nonproliferation and Proliferation Conditions 32 Table 1.2: Post-Fukushima Nonproliferation and Proliferation Conditions 33 vi LIST OF ACRONYMNS ANEC Anti-Nuclear Energy Coalition ANWC Anti-Nuclear Weapons Coalition CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty ENR Enrichment and Reprocessing HEU Highly Enriched Uranium IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency JST Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan KAERI Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute NNWS Non-Nuclear Weapons States NPT Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons PNEC Pro-Nuclear Energy Coalition PNWC Pro-Nuclear Weapons Coalition WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction Chapter 3 DPJ Democratic Party of Japan GHQ U.S. General Headquarters JCP Japan Communist Party JSP Japan Socialist Party LDP Liberal Democratic Party NRA Nuclear Regulation Authority TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Chapter 4 AEC Atomic Energy Commission GNP Grand National Party KCIA Korean Central Intelligence Agency KEPCO Korea Electric Power Corporation KHNP Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power KNEF Korea Nuclear Energy Foundation MEST Ministry of Education Science and Technology MOTIE Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy NSSC Nuclear Safety and Security Commission ROK Republic of Korea SCNR Supreme Council for National Reconstruction WEC Weapons Exploitation Committee Chapter 5 AEC Atomic Energy Council DPP Democratic Progressive Party KMT Kuomintang PRC People‟s Republic of China ROC Republic of China TaiPower Taiwan Power Company INER Institute of Nuclear Energy Research vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Undertaking this Ph.D. has been a truly life-changing experience for me and it would not have been possible without the support and guidance that I received from teachers, mentors, friends, and family. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor and mentor Professor Etel Solingen for the continuous support of my Ph.D. study and related research, for her patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. Her guidance helped me researching and writing of this dissertation. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my Ph.D. study. Besides my advisor, I would like to thank the rest of my dissertation committee: Professor Caesar Sereseres and Professor Patrick M. Morgan, for their insightful comments and encouragements, but also for the hard questions which incited me to widen my research from various perspectives. I gratefully acknowledge the research funding received from the Fulbright Association to conduct field research in South Korea. I would like to thank Professor Sung-han Kim for his encouragement and supervisory role while I was conducting my research at Korea University. I am also grateful to the funding received from the Japan Foundation to conduct field research in Japan. I would like to thank Professor Yasuhiro Matsuda for his guidance and insightful comments while I was conducting my research at the University of Tokyo. I would like to thank all the interviewees during my field research in South Korea and Japan. Through hours of discussions and interviews, I gained immense knowledge and understanding of each country. I am deeply thankful to my family for their love, support, and sacrifices. Without them, this dissertation would never have been written. I would like to thank my parents, whose love and guidance are with me in whatever I pursue. Most importantly, I wish to thank my loving and supportive wife, Minjin Chung, and my two wonderful children, Tay Ha Lee and June Ha Lee, who provide unending inspiration. viii CURRICULUM VITAE Alex Chang Lee University of California, Irvine – Department of Political Science Education Ph.D. University of California, Irvine – Political Science, 2019 Research Fields: 1) International Relations, 2) Comparative Politics Dissertation: Nuclear Debates and Political Competition in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: Denuclearization or Nuclear Latency in the aftermath of Fukushima Committee: Etel Solingen (chair), Patrick M. Morgan, and Caesar Sereseres Korea University (Ilmin International Relations Institute), Seoul, South Korea – Fulbright Scholar, 2015-2016 University of Tokyo (Advance Asian Studies Institute), Tokyo, Japan – Japan Foundation Doctoral Fellow, 2016-2017 M.A. University of California, Irvine – Political Science, 2014 M.A. Korea University GSIS – International Security, 2010 B.A. Southern Methodist University – International Studies, 2005 Fellowships 1) Post-doctoral Stanton Nuclear Security Fellowship at MIT‟s Security Studies Program, 2019-2020 2) Post-doctoral Borg Fellowship at Weatherhead East Asian Institute at Columbia University, 2019-2020 (declined) Japanese Studies Doctoral Fellowship at Tokyo University (Japan Foundation), 2016-2017 2) Asia-Pacific Nuclear History (APNHI) Institute (Wilson Center) Fellowship, November 2016 3) Non-resident James Kelly Fellowship, Pacific Forum CSIS, 2016 4) Fulbright Research Fellowship, U.S. Department of State (IIE), 2015-2016 5) Center for Global Peace and Conflict Studies Graduate Student Affiliate Fellowship, 2014 6) Center of Democracy Study (CDS) Research Affiliate Fellowship, 2012 7) Walter F. Mondale Ambassador‟s Fellowship, 2003 Additional Training and Education 1) Asia-Pacific Nuclear History (APNHI) Institute (Wilson Center), Nov. 2016 2) Nonproliferation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taiwanese Sovereignty & the United States' Strategic
    TAIWANESE SOVEREIGNTY & THE UNITED STATES’ STRATEGIC DETERRENCE OF CHINA Brent A. Alves Captain, United States Air Force Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for AIR UNIVERSITY ADVANCED RESEARCH PROGRAM NEXT GENERATION INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE In part of SQUADRON OFFICER SCHOOL VIRTUAL – IN RESIDENCE CLASS 21D AIR UNIVERSITY MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE May 2021 Dislcaimer: “Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US Government agency.” Abstract Since the Chinese Civil War ended in 1949, the United States has maintained a rather complex relationship between the governments of the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) (China). Recently, Beijing has taken an increasingly aggressive stance towards Taipei with their “One China Principle”. Under the “One China Principle”, the end goal is the reunification of China under the government of the PRC. With the aim of preserving regional stability in the Indo-Pacific, the United States and its allies require innovative, as well as traditional solutions. This paper explores the solutions that the United States could employ to maintain regional stability, as well as geopolitical ties in the region. Introduction Historically, the United States has sustained a healthy level of strategic dominance regarding deterrence and China in the INDOPACOM (Indo-Pacific Command) region. However, China has experienced tremendous economic growth over the past two decades, which has led to their defense budget growing by approximately 640 percent between 1996 and 2014.1 As China continues to grow economically and militarily, dominance is no longer a necessary condition for deterrence.2 Rather than focusing on dominance, it is necessary for the United States to employ other forms of deterrence with its new-peer competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Chinese Group Tour Boom 中國團體旅遊熱潮之後
    December 2018 | Vol. 48 | Issue 12 THE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN TAIPEI IN OF COMMERCE THE AMERICAN CHAMBER After the Chinese Group Tour Boom 中國團體旅遊熱潮之後 TAIWAN BUSINESS TOPICS TAIWAN December 2018 | Vol. 48 | Issue 12 Vol. 2018 | December 中 華 郵 政 北 台 字 第 5000 SPECIAL REPORT 號 執 照 登 記 為 雜 誌2019 交 寄 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK Published by the American Chamber Of NT$150 Commerce In Taipei Read TOPICS Online at topics.amcham.com.tw 12_2018_Cover.indd 1 2018/12/9 下午6:55 CONTENTS NEWS AND VIEWS 6 Editorial Don’t Move Backwards on IPR DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME 48, NUMBER 12 7 Taiwan Briefs By Don Shapiro 10 Issues Publisher Higher Rating in World Bank William Foreman Editor-in-Chief Survey Don Shapiro Art Director/ / By Don Shapiro Production Coordinator Katia Chen Manager, Publications Sales & Marketing COVER SECTION Caroline Lee Translation After the Chinese Group Tour Kevin Chen, Yichun Chen, Charlize Hung Boom 中國團體旅遊熱潮之後 By Matthew Fulco 撰文／傅長壽 American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei 129 MinSheng East Road, Section 3, 14 Taiwan’s Hotels Grapple with 7F, Suite 706, Taipei 10596, Taiwan P.O. Box 17-277, Taipei, 10419 Taiwan Oversupply Tel: 2718-8226 Fax: 2718-8182 旅 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.amcham.com.tw Although market demand is flat, additional new hotels continue to 050 2718-8226 2718-8182 be constructed. 21 Airbnb on the Brink in Taiwan Business Topics is a publication of the American Taiwan Chamber of Commerce in Taipei, ROC. Contents are independent of and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Changes in regulatory approaches Officers, Board of Governors, Supervisors or members.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Fukushima: Nuclear Power in East Asia
    LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA EDITED BY PETER VAN NESS AND MEL GURTOV WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANDREW BLAKERS, MELY CABALLERO-ANTHONY, GLORIA KUANG-JUNG HSU, AMY KING, DOUG KOPLOW, ANDERS P. MØLLER, TIMOTHY A. MOUSSEAU, M. V. RAMANA, LAUREN RICHARDSON, KALMAN A. ROBERTSON, TILMAN A. RUFF, CHRISTINA STUART, TATSUJIRO SUZUKI, AND JULIUS CESAR I. TRAJANO Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Learning from Fukushima : nuclear power in East Asia / Peter Van Ness, Mel Gurtov, editors. ISBN: 9781760461393 (paperback) 9781760461409 (ebook) Subjects: Nuclear power plants--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Risk assessment--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Health aspects--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--East Asia--Evaluation. Other Creators/Contributors: Van Ness, Peter, editor. Gurtov, Melvin, editor. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image: ‘Fukushima apple tree’ by Kristian Laemmle-Ruff. Near Fukushima City, 60 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, February 2014. The number in the artwork is the radioactivity level measured in the orchard—2.166 microsieverts per hour, around 20 times normal background radiation. This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Acronyms and abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right Movement and South Korean Cultural Memory
    1 1948 as Division or Foundation? The New Right Movement and South Korean Cultural Memory A Mnemohistorical Approach Patrick Vierthaler Kyoto University Introduction Since the 1990s, and especially the mid-2000s, South Korea has witnessed intense struggles over the memory of its modern and contemporary history, manifesting most notably in disputes over the responsibility for colonial era crimes, the debate on pro-Japanese collaborators (or so- called ch’in’ilp’a), the commemoration of Park Chung-hee and Syngman Rhee, the contents of high school history textbooks, and the nature and narrative of national memorial days. One of these disputes is over the establishment (= “foundation”) of the South Korean state and how to commemorate it. Where do these struggles originate? Why did they intensify in the early and mid-2000s? And, crucially, how can these struggles over “history” be explained and analyzed methodologically? In this essay, I approach these disputes from a mnemohistorical perspective, utilizing the concept of Cultural memory. 1. Theoretical Concepts — Struggles over History as Struggles over Cultural Memory No society can be said to possess a unified and static historical memory. Rather, different memory communities co-exist within each society, with individuals often belonging to multiple memory communities at the same time. Peter Burke (1997: 56) terms these “different memory communities within a given society”, i.e. communities affected by the social organisation of transmission and the different media employed. Understanding
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea | Freedom House: Freedom in the World 2019
    South Korea | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/south-korea A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 11 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The 1988 constitution vests executive power in a directly elected president, who is limited to a single five-year term. Executive elections in South Korea are largely free and fair. Moon Jae-in of the liberal Minjoo Party won a May 2017 snap presidential election following the impeachment of former president Park. He took 41 percent of the vote, followed by Hong Jun-pyo of the conservative Liberty Korea Party with 24 percent and Ahn Cheol-soo of the centrist People’s Party with 21 percent. About 77 percent of registered voters turned out for the election. In the June 2018 local elections, the Minjoo Party won 14 of 17 metropolitan mayoral and gubernatorial offices, with two of the others going to the Liberty Korea Party and one to an independent. Turnout for the local elections was 60.2 percent, marking the first time the voting rate had surpassed 60 percent for local elections since 1995. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The unicameral National Assembly is composed of 300 members serving four-year terms, with 253 elected in single-member constituencies and 47 through national party lists. The contests are typically free of major irregularities. In the 2016 elections, the Minjoo Party won 123 seats, while the Saenuri Party (which later became the Liberty Korea Party) won 122.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Environmental Ngos in Tackling Environmental Problems in Taiwan Yttrium Sua Pomona College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2015 Bridging the Blue-Green Divide: The Role of Environmental NGOs in Tackling Environmental Problems in Taiwan Yttrium Sua Pomona College Recommended Citation Sua, Yttrium, "Bridging the Blue-Green Divide: The Role of Environmental NGOs in Tackling Environmental Problems in Taiwan" (2015). Pomona Senior Theses. Paper 133. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/133 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bridging the Blue-Green Divide: The Role of Environmental NGOs in Tackling Environmental Problems in Taiwan Yttrium Sua In partial fulfillment of a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Environmental Analysis, 2014-2015 academic year, Pomona College, Claremont, California Readers: Professor William Ascher & Professor Melinda Herrold-Menzies Acknowledgements Many thanks to… The Schulz Fund for Environmental Studies, funded by Jean Shulz, for funding my sophomore year summer research The Pomona College Summer Funding Internship Program for funding my junior year summer internship Professor William Ascher, Professor Melinda Herrold-Menzies, Professor Char Miller, and Professor Dru Gladney for the constant guidance and mentoring throughout the thesis writing process All my interviewees,
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Chaebol Reform Process Move Forward Under the Moon Jae-In Administration? —Future Directions and Challenges—
    Will the Chaebol Reform Process Move Forward under the Moon Jae-in Administration? —Future Directions and Challenges— By Hidehiko Mukoyama Senior Economist Economics Department Japan Research Institute Summary 1. Collusive links between politics and business were a major focus during South Korea’s 2017 presidential election. In an address to the national after his election victory, President Moon Jae-in promised to carry out reforms targeting the chaebol (industrial conglomerates) and eliminate collusion between politicians and business people. The purpose of this article is to clarify how the chaebol reform process is likely to proceed, what the focal points will be, and the issues that could arise. 2. The economic policy of the Moon Jae-in administration is based on the four pillars of income-driven growth, the establishment of an economy that will generate jobs, fair competition (including chaebol reform), and growth through innovation. Immediately after taking power, President Moon Jae-in announced policies targeted toward income-driven growth. Efforts to achieve growth through innovation began in the fall of 2017. The chaebol reform process has not yet begun. 3. Chaebol reform is necessary for several reasons. First, the concentration of economic power in the hands of the chaebol is producing harmful effects, including growing economic disparity, and a lack of jobs for young workers. Second, there have been numerous fraud cases relating to the inheritance of management rights by members of the chaebol families. Third, the chaebol have repeatedly colluded with politicians. 4. One reason for repeated cases of business-political collusion is the enormous amount of au- thority wielded by the South Korean president.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Putinism? M
    October 2017, Volume 28, Number 4 $14.00 What Is Putinism? M. Steven Fish Vladimir Kara-Murza Leon Aron Lilia Shevtsova Vladislav Inozemtsev Graeme Robertson and Samuel Greene Eroding Norms and Democratic Deconsolidation Paul Howe Iran’s 2017 Election: Two Views Abbas Milani Ladan Boroumand Marc F. Plattner on Democracy’s Fading Allure Gi-Wook Shin & Rennie Moon on South Korea’s Impeachment Drama Michael C. Davis on Constitutionalism in Asia Ken Menkhaus on Somalia’s Elections Staffan Lindberg et al. on Measuring Democratic Backsliding Social Media and Democracy Joshua Tucker, Yannis Theocharis, Margaret Roberts, and Pablo Barberá SOUTH KOREA AFTER IMPEACHMENT Gi-Wook Shin and Rennie J. Moon Gi-Wook Shin is professor of sociology and director of the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. Rennie J. Moon is associate professor of research methods at Un- derwood International College of Yonsei University and the 2016–17 Koret Fellow at the Shorenstein Center. In just over a year, between April 2016 and May 2017, a series of dra- matic events roiled the domestic politics of South Korea (hereinafter Korea). Things began normally enough: An election to fill all 300 seats in the unicameral National Assembly went forward as scheduled on 13 April 2016. A presidential balloting was set to follow in due course near the close of 2017 as the incumbent, Park Geun Hye of the right-of-center Saenuri (New Frontier) Party,1 finished the single five-year term that the constitution allows. In late October 2016, however, a lightning bolt of scandal electri- fied the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Redeploying US Nuclear Weapons to South Korea
    Redeploying U.S. Nuclear Weapons to South Korea: Background and Implications in Brief Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs September 14, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44950 Redeploying U.S. Nuclear Weapons to South Korea: Background and Implications in Brief Summary Recent advances in North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs have led to discussions, both within South Korea and, reportedly, between the United States and South Korean officials, about the possible redeployment of U.S. nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula. The United States deployed nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula between 1958 and 1991. Although it removed the weapons as a part of a post-Cold War change in its nuclear posture, the United States remains committed to defending South Korea under the 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty and to employing nuclear weapons, if necessary, in that defense. The only warheads remaining in the U.S. stockpile that could be deployed on the Korean Peninsula are B61 bombs. Before redeploying these to South Korea, where they would remain under U.S. control, the United States would have to recreate the infrastructure needed to house the bombs and would also have to train and certify the personnel responsible for maintaining the weapons and operating the aircraft for the nuclear mission. Some who support the redeployment of U.S. nuclear weapons argue that their presence on the peninsula would send a powerful deterrent message to the North and demonstrate a strong commitment to the South. Their presence would allow for a more rapid nuclear response to a North Korean attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's 2014 Nine-In-One Election
    TAIWAN’S 2014 NINE-IN-ONE ELECTION: GAUGING POLITICS, THE PARTIES, AND FUTURE LEADERS By John F. Copper* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 2 II. PAN-GREEN’S HANDICAPS ...................... 6 III. PAN-BLUE’S TRAVAILS ........................... 17 IV. PRE-ELECTION POLITICS ........................ 28 A. State of the Economy ............................ 28 B. Sunflower Student Movement ................... 31 C. Gas Explosion in Kaohsiung and Bad Cooking Oil Incidents ..................................... 36 V. THE CANDIDATES AND THE CAMPAIGN ..... 39 A. Taipei Mayor Race: Sean Lien v. KO Wen-je .... 44 B. Taichung Mayor Race: Jason Hu v. LIN Chia- Lung . ............................................ 48 C. Predictions of Other Elections ................... 50 D. How Different Factors May Have Influenced Voting ........................................... 50 VI. THE ELECTION RESULTS ........................ 51 A. Taipei City Mayoral Election Results ............ 53 B. Taichung Mayoral Election Results .............. 55 C. New Taipei Mayoral, Taoyuan Mayoral and Other Election Results ................................. 56 D. Main Reasons Cited Locally for the DPP Win and KMT Defeat ................................ 59 E. Reaction and Interpretation of the Election by the Media and Officialdom in Other Countries . 61 VII. CONCLUSIONS ......... ........................... 64 A. Consequences of This Election in Terms of Its Impact on Taiwan’s Future ...................... 70 * John F. Copper is the Stanley J. Buckman Professor of International Studies (emeritus) at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. He is the author of a number of books on Taiwan, including Taiwan’s Democracy on Trial in 2010, Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? Sixth edition in 2013 and The KMT Returns to Power: Elections in Taiwan 2008 to 2012 (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013). He has written on Taiwan’s elections since 1980. (1) 2 CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES SERIES B.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia's Emerging Nuclear Era: Climate Strategies & Implications for U.S
    Asia's Emerging Nuclear Era: Climate Strategies & Implications for U.S. Policy Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies Task Force: 2011 $VLD¶V(PHUJLQJ1XFOHDU(UD Climate Strategies & Implications for U.S. Policy Task Force Report 2011 Task Force Advisor: Scott L. Montgomery Task Force Evaluator: Ambassador Thomas Graham, Jr. Task Force Members: Chantal Anderson Kristina Backstrom Heather Early Sylvia Gozdek Alyssa Hunt Emilia Jones Andrew Kim Kimberly Kuo Sandy Lee Christan Leonard (Editor) Darren Levin (Editor) Ann Pederson Mbasireh Saidybah Alexandra Sawyer Brandon Skyles Nikki Thompson (Coordinator) Michelle Tong Asia’s Emerging Nuclear Era: Climate Strategies and Implications for U.S. Policy Policy Brief Background: Earth‘s climate is changing rapidly. Two centuries of burning fossil fuels have increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. This has led to elevated mean near-surface temperatures, rising sea levels, and acidification of the oceans. As the harmful effects of climate change become more apparent, many nations are turning to nuclear power as a viable option to meet rising demands for electricity with minimal carbon emissions. Concentrated in Asia, where hundreds of new reactors will be built in the next few decades, the new era of nuclear power expansion is underway. A nuclear power plant has not been built in the U.S. in over 30 years, suggesting America may be falling behind in nuclear technology. The American public has a largely negative perception of nuclear power due to past accidents at Chernobyl and Three-Mile Island. In the post 9/11 world, Americans are also particularly concerned about national security and the threat of nuclear terrorism.
    [Show full text]