DOCSLIB.ORG

The Christian Alexander

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Christian Alexander THE CHRISTIAN ALEXANDER THE USE OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT IN EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE BY CHRISTIAN THRUE DJURSLEV November 2 2015 DECLARATION Submitted by CHRISTIAN THRUE DJURSLEV to the UNIVERSITY OF EXETER as a thesis for the degree of doctor of philosophy in Classics and Ancient History, November 2 2015. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. SIGNATURE : Christian Thrue Djurslev (signed) Dedicated to the Memory of Mary Ussher (August 25 1951 — April 6 2015 Easter Monday). ‘Eine klare zusammenfassende Lemmatasammlung zu Alexander etwa für die Patrologie gibt es nicht, doch ist zu vermuten, daß eine solche über das dargelegte hinaus kaum Neues würde bieten können.’ Gerhard Wirth, Der Weg in die Vergessenheit – Zum Schicksal des antiken Alexanderbildes, p. 58 n. 186. ‘Amitay assumes a familiarity with Alexander that is most unlikely among the audiences to which Jesus and his followers preached.’ David Madsen, Review of Ory Amitay From Alexander to Jesus, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2011.09.32. v ABSTRACT THE CHRISTIAN ALEXANDER THE USE OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT IN EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE By CHRISTIAN THRUE DJURSLEV The aim of the present study is to examine how the legacy of Alexander was appro- priated, altered and used in arguments in early Christian discourse (c. 200-600). There is an inventory of all the early Christian references to Alexander in Appendix 1. The structure of the thesis is conceived as an unequal triptych: it is divided into three parts with subdivisions into three chapters of varying lengths (Part III contains two chapters and the thesis conclusion). Each part is prefaced with a short description of its contents. Each chapter within those parts have a preliminary remark to introduce the principal subject area with a brief conclusion in the back of it. Part I explores the Alexander traditions of three geographical centres of the Chris- tian world: Alexandria (Ch. 1), Jerusalem (Ch. 2) and Rome (Ch. 3). It shows how the Jewish tales from these cities, such as the Josephan tale about Alexander’s visit to Jer- usalem, were used in a variety of diverging, often contradictory, ways. Part II turns to the writings of the apologists in the second and third centuries. It discusses three prevalent themes associated with Alexander: historiography (Ch. 4), divine honours (Ch. 5) and Greek philosophy (Ch. 6). Part III moves on to the central texts and Alexander themes in the fourth to sixth centuries. It focuses on his role in Christian chronicles, church histories and repres- entations of their world (Ch. 7), and also the rhetorical use of the figure in Christian preaching and public speaking (Ch. 8). Taken together, these three parts form the overarching argument that Alexander did not only fill many diverse roles in Christian representations of the remote past, but also featured in contemporary discourse on Christian culture, identities and soci- eties, as well as in arguments made on behalf of the Christian religion itself. Indeed, the Christians frequently juxtapose the figure with distinctively Christian features, such as the life of Jesus, the Apostles, the church, sacred cities and holy spaces. They incorporate him into discourses on peace, mercy, generosity and abstinence. In other words, they repeatedly made Alexander relevant for what they considered important and, thus, created their own distinct discourse on the figure. vii CONTENTS ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................13 A NOTE ON CONVENTIONS..........................................................................................14 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 15 A. APPROACHES TO ALEXANDER LITERATURE.............................................................................17 B. CURRENT CONTENTIONS......................................................................................................23 C. THE PROJECT: PRACTICE AND THEORY.................................................................................27 D. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................37 E. OVERVIEW OF THE ARGUMENT..............................................................................................41 PART I................................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 1: ALEXANDER’S CITY...................................................................................45 PRELIMINARIES........................................................................................................................45 1.1. THE FOUNDATION OF ALEXANDRIA....................................................................................49 1.2. CIVIC RIGHTS TO ALEXANDRIAN JEWS...............................................................................55 1.3. THE TRANSLATION OF THE SEPTUAGINT.............................................................................59 1.4. THE BONES OF JEREMIAH.................................................................................................63 1.5. THE SIBYLLINE ORACLES..................................................................................................65 1.5.1. ‘BABYLON PROVED ALEXANDER A CORPSE’.............................................................................67 1.6. ALEXANDER’S PILGRIMAGE TO JERUSALEM..........................................................................71 1.6.1. ORIGEN’S VERSION..............................................................................................................77 1.6.2. EUSEBIUS’ VERSIONS...........................................................................................................79 1.6.3. LATIN VERSIONS.................................................................................................................83 1.6.4. BYZANTINE VERSIONS..........................................................................................................85 1.6.5. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS....................................................................................................88 1.7. CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................90 CHAPTER 2: JERUSALEM..............................................................................................91 PRELIMINARIES........................................................................................................................91 2.1. THE BOOK OF DANIEL....................................................................................................100 2.1.1. DANIEL 8. THE GOAT OF GOATS........................................................................................102 2.1.2. DANIEL 2. TRANSLATIO IMPERII.........................................................................................108 2.1.3. DANIEL 7. EMPIRES AND MONSTERS...................................................................................119 ix 2.2. MAJOR AND MINOR PROPHETS.......................................................................................125 2.3. REVELATION...................................................................................................................130 2.4. THE FIRST BOOK OF MACCABEES...................................................................................136 2.5. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................142 CHAPTER 3: ROME...................................................................................................143 PRELIMINARIES......................................................................................................................143 3.1. THE GATE OF ALEXANDER..............................................................................................145 3.2. PHILO’S CALANUS...........................................................................................................151 3.3. MOSOLLAMUS................................................................................................................155 3.4. ALEXANDER, MOSES AND THE RED SEA..........................................................................155 3.5. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................156 PART II................................................................................................................ 157 CHAPTER 4: REVISIONS OF KNOWLEDGE.....................................................................158 PRELIMINARIES......................................................................................................................158 4.1. APOLOGETIC HISTORIES....................................................................................................161 4.1.1. JULIUS AFRICANUS.............................................................................................................164
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issue 24 Autumn 2019
    Quarr Abbey Issue 24 NEWSLETTER Autumn 2019 Unity of Life The man had just parked his bicycle and was taking off his helmet when, seeing me, he sort of abruptly asked: “Tell me, Father: What should I do so that Friends of Quarr what I do when I am praying in this amazing church and what I do outside The Friends are pleased to report that become one thing?” – “Good question”, I replied “How can our life be ‘one’?” the retiring collection from the Concert This question concerns all, but in a sense, it lies at the heart of monastic of Sacred Music, performed in the identity. The monk strives for unity. The Latin word monachus, which gave Abbey Church by the Orpheus Singers the English ‘monk’, comes from the Greek ‘monos’: ‘one’. The monks’ life in aid of our Accessible Paths Project, tends towards unity. They pursue it and already manifest it: a community at amounted to £712. The Gift Aid of £118 prayer is a sign of unity. will go to the abbey. It is not always easy, though. On the one hand, one has to consent to positive I would like to thank the Orpheus Singers on behalf of the Friends for tensions such as prayer and work; solitude and community; retreat and performing the concert and helping us hospitality. At first, they may be seen as tearing us apart. Well managed, they with our fundraising efforts in aid of this actually create a dynamic. The different poles of our lives begin to enrich one project. another.
    [Show full text]
  • Hérésies : Une Construction D’Identités Religieuses
    Hérésies : une construction d’identités religieuses Quelles sortes de communautés réunissent les hommes ? Comment sont- elles construites ? Où est l’unité, où est la multiplicité de l’humanité ? Les hommes peuvent former des communautés distinctes, antagonistes, s’opposant violemment. La division externe est-elle nécessaire pour bâtir une cohésion interne ? Rien n’est plus actuel que ces questions. Parmi toutes ces formes de dissensions, les études qui composent ce volume s’intéressent à l’hérésie. L’hérésie se caractérise par sa relativité. Nul ne se revendique hérétique, sinon par provocation. Le qualificatif d’hérétique est toujours subi par celui qui le porte et il est toujours porté DYE BROUWER, GUILLAUME CHRISTIAN PAR EDITE ROMPAEY VAN ET ANJA Hérésies : une construction sur autrui. Cela rend l’hérésie difficilement saisissable si l’on cherche ce qu’elle est en elle-même. Mais le phénomène apparaît avec davantage de clarté si l’on analyse les discours qui l’utilisent. Se dessinent dès lors les d’identités religieuses représentations qui habitent les auteurs de discours sur l’hérésie et les hérétiques, discours généralement sous-tendus par une revendication à EDITE PAR CHRISTIAN BROUWER, GUILLAUME DYE ET ANJA VAN ROMPAEY l’orthodoxie. Hérésie et orthodoxie forment ainsi un couple, désuni mais inséparable. Car du point de vue de l’orthodoxie, l’hérésie est un choix erroné, une déviation, voire une déviance. En retour, c’est bien parce qu’un courant se proclame orthodoxe que les courants concurrents peuvent être accusés d’hérésie. Sans opinion correcte, pas de choix déviant. La thématique de l’hérésie s’inscrit ainsi dans les questions de recherche sur l’altérité religieuse.
    [Show full text]
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Origen in the Likeness of Philo: Eusebius of Caesarea's Portrait Of
    SCJR 12, no. 1 (2017): 1-13 Origen in the Likeness of Philo: Eusebius of Caesarea’s Portrait of the Model Scholar JUSTIN M. ROGERS [email protected] Freed-Hardeman University, Henderson, TN 38340 The name of Philo of Alexandria occurs more in the writings of Eusebius of Caesarea than in those of any other ancient author. Philo’s name can be located over 20 times in the surviving literary corpus of Eusebius,1 and there is strong ev- idence that Eusebius’ Caesarean library is the very reason Philo’s works exist today.2 In all probability, the core of this library can be traced to the personal col- lection of Origen when he settled in Caesarea in 232 CE.3 Eusebius’ own teacher Pamphilus expanded the library, and took great pains to copy and preserve Ori- gen’s own works. What we have, then, is a literary union between Philo and Origen, Alexandrians within the same exegetical tradition. But we can go further. Ilaria Ramelli has argued that Eusebius’ accounts of Philo and Origen in the Ecclesiastical History are strikingly similar, picking up Robert Grant’s stress on the similarity between Origen and the Philonic Therapeutae.4 Here, I further Ramelli’s work by noting additional similarities in the Eusebian biographical presentations. I also point to the tension Eusebius felt between Philo Christianus and Philo Judaeus, a tension detectible in his presentation of the Therapeutae, a group about whom Philo reported and whom Eusebius considered to be the first Egyptian Christians.5 The result is that Eusebius recognized Philo to be exegeti- cally closer to Christianity, and religiously closer to Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer and the Healing of Nature
    PRAYER AND THE HEALING OF NATURE Robert Govaerts UR MENTAL ATTITUDES, CONVICTIONS, desires, wills, and indeed O prayers not only affect ourselves, but necessarily also influence the existence of other beings and, ultimately, the global and cosmic totality. I would like to argue that the mental disposition and spiritual openness that help to attune us to God’s will and prepare us to receive God’s grace, within ourselves and within wider creation, are crucial for the healing of the self and of nature. As such, I consider that the prayer and spiritual seeking that aim to involve our entire being in attunement with the wider creation are human capacities indispensable for universal well-being. I shall seek for inspiration especially in St Paul, in the Gospels, in the Byzantine saint Maximus the Confessor, and in modern science.1 The Context of Human Existence With the early Church fathers Gregory of Nyssa (c.335 – c.395) and Maximus the Confessor (c.580–662) we can envisage that the path of created reality moves from division into multiplicity towards harmony in unity.2 The divisions that are omnipresent within created reality fragment and distort a creature’s particular existence; they divide the various created realities from each other; and above all they divide those realities from God the Creator. Earlier than Gregory or Maximus, Paul had affirmed that the unity of creation, in which divisions have been overcome, is reached through and in Christ. The ultimate destiny of both humanity and the universal creation is reached when all things have been subjected to 1 This article is indebted to André Louf’s ‘Prayer and Ecology’, The Way, 45/4 (October 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Charity in Roman Palestine
    Poverty and charity in Roman Palestine Gildas Hamel Abstract The present book reformats the text, notes, and appendices of the origi- nal 1990 publication by the University of California Press. Its pagination is different. There is no index. i D’ur vamm ha d’ur breur aet d’an Anaon re abred A.M.G. 31 Meurzh 1975 Y.M.H. 12 Geñver 1986 Contents Contents ii List of Figures iv List of Tables iv Introduction ix 1 Daily bread 1 1.1 Food items ............................. 2 1.2 Diets ................................ 19 1.3 Diseases and death ........................ 55 1.4 Conclusion ............................ 58 2 Poverty in clothing 61 2.1 Common articles of clothing ................... 61 2.2 Lack of clothing .......................... 70 2.3 Clothing and social status .................... 81 2.4 Conclusion ............................ 104 3 Causes of poverty 107 3.1 Discourse of the ancients on yields . 108 3.2 Aspects of agriculture: climate and soil . 116 3.3 Work and technical standards . 125 3.4 Yields ............................... 145 3.5 Population of Palestine . 159 3.6 Conclusion ............................ 163 4 Taxes and rents 165 4.1 Roman taxes . 168 ii Contents iii 4.2 Jewish taxes and history of tax burden . 171 4.3 Labor and ground rents . 176 4.4 Conclusion ............................ 190 5 The vocabulary of poverty 193 5.1 Explicit vocabulary: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek . 196 5.2 Explicit vocabulary: self-designations . 209 5.3 Greek and Jewish views on poverty and wealth . 229 5.4 Implicit vocabulary . 239 5.5 Conclusion ............................ 248 6 Charity in Roman Palestine 251 6.1 Discourses on charity .
    [Show full text]
  • English Monks Suppression of the Monasteries
    ENGLISH MONKS and the SUPPRESSION OF THE MONASTERIES ENGLISH MONKS and the SUPPRESSION OF THE MONASTERIES by GEOFFREY BAS KER VILLE M.A. (I) JONA THAN CAPE THIRTY BEDFORD SQUARE LONDON FIRST PUBLISHED I937 JONATHAN CAPE LTD. JO BEDFORD SQUARE, LONDON AND 91 WELLINGTON STREET WEST, TORONTO PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN IN THE CITY OF OXFORD AT THE ALDEN PRESS PAPER MADE BY JOHN DICKINSON & CO. LTD. BOUND BY A. W. BAIN & CO. LTD. CONTENTS PREFACE 7 INTRODUCTION 9 I MONASTIC DUTIES AND ACTIVITIES I 9 II LAY INTERFERENCE IN MONASTIC AFFAIRS 45 III ECCLESIASTICAL INTERFERENCE IN MONASTIC AFFAIRS 72 IV PRECEDENTS FOR SUPPRESSION I 308- I 534 96 V THE ROYAL VISITATION OF THE MONASTERIES 1535 120 VI SUPPRESSION OF THE SMALLER MONASTERIES AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE 1536-1537 144 VII FROM THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE TO THE FINAL SUPPRESSION 153 7- I 540 169 VIII NUNS 205 IX THE FRIARS 2 2 7 X THE FATE OF THE DISPOSSESSED RELIGIOUS 246 EPILOGUE 273 APPENDIX 293 INDEX 301 5 PREFACE THE four hundredth anniversary of the suppression of the English monasteries would seem a fit occasion on which to attempt a summary of the latest views on a thorny subject. This book cannot be expected to please everybody, and it makes no attempt to conciliate those who prefer sentiment to truth, or who allow their reading of historical events to be distorted by present-day controversies, whether ecclesiastical or political. In that respect it tries to live up to the dictum of Samuel Butler that 'he excels most who hits the golden mean most exactly in the middle'.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarr Abbey Newsletter Easter 2021.Indd
    Quarr Abbey Issue 29 NEWSLETTER Easter 2021 Easter Joy The Cross is the great Christian symbol. It evokes Jesus who died on a cross on the Friday before the great Sabbath of Pessah, the Jewish feast of Easter. Whereas free Friends of Quarr men condemned to death were beheaded, slaves were crucified. Pontius Pilate had thousands of men crucified. No death was deemed more abject. The Covid-19 pandemic continues and I Christian faith has it that the same Jesus rose from the dead on the morning of write this in the third Lockdown when the first day after the Sabbath – which was to become the Day of the Lord, our sadly all the activities of the Friends Sunday, the first day of the Christian week. How is it then that Christians chose continue to be suspended. the Cross as their main symbol instead of an image of Christ getting out of the We managed however, to arrange a tomb with the full energy of the Resurrection? small Covid-19 secure Completion Let me suggest only one answer among many. What was so important on the Celebration of The Accessible Paths Cross, what we do not want to forget, what stands at the heart of Christian faith is project on 8th December 2020, when what St Paul calls the proof that God loves us. “God”, he writes, “proves his love HM Lord-Lieutenant of the Isle of for us in that while we still were sinners Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). The Wight, Mrs Susie Sheldon, JP, unveiled a Cross is the symbol and the revelation of God’s love: Jesus loves us by giving His donor board for the Friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES
    Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 7 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrolog- ical and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) was supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Meta- physics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 Number 6: Donald J. Mastronarde, Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides, 2017 Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity Olivier Dufault CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2019 by Olivier Dufault.
    [Show full text]
  • Pythagorean, Predecessor, and Hebrew: Philo of Alexandria and the Construction of Jewishness in Early Christian Writings
    Pythagorean, Predecessor, and Hebrew: Philo of Alexandria and the Construction of Jewishness in Early Christian Writings Jennifer Otto Faculty of Religious Studies McGill University, Montreal March, 2014 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Jennifer Otto, 2014 ii Table of Contents Abstracts v Acknowledgements vii Abbreviations viii Introduction 1 Method, Aims and Scope of the Thesis 10 Christians and Jews among the nations 12 Philo and the Wisdom of the Greeks 16 Christianity as Philosophy 19 Moving Forward 24 Part I Chapter 1: Philo in Modern Scholarship 25 Introducing Philo 25 Philo the Jew in modern research 27 Conclusions 48 Chapter 2: Sects and Texts: The Setting of the Christian Encounter with Philo 54 The Earliest Alexandrian Christians 55 The Trajanic Revolt 60 The “Catechetical School” of Alexandria— A Continuous 63 Jewish-Christian Institution? An Alternative Hypothesis: Reading Philo in the Philosophical Schools 65 Conclusions 70 Part II Chapter 3: The Pythagorean: Clement’s Philo 72 1. Introducing Clement 73 1.1 Clement’s Life 73 1.2 Clement’s Corpus 75 1.3 Clement’s Teaching 78 2. Israel, Hebrews, and Jews in Clement’s Writings 80 2.1 Israel 81 2.2 Hebrews 82 2.3 Jews 83 3. Clement’s Reception of Philo: Literature Review 88 4. Clement’s Testimonia to Philo 97 4.1 Situating the Philonic Borrowings in the context of Stromateis 1 97 4.2 Stromateis 1.5.31 102 4.3 Stromateis 1.15.72 106 4.4 Stromateis 1.23.153 109 iii 4.5 Situating the Philonic Borrowings in the context of Stromateis 2 111 4.6 Stromateis 2.19.100 113 5.
    [Show full text]
  • T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8bg2tr0 No online items T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by Gayle M. Richardson, April 30, 2009. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2009 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. T. E. Lawrence Papers: Finding mssTEL 1-1277 1 Aid Overview of the Collection Title: T. E. Lawrence Papers Dates (inclusive): 1894-2006 Bulk dates: 1911-2000 Collection Number: mssTEL 1-1277 Creator: Lawrence, T. E. (Thomas Edward), 1888-1935. Extent: 8,707 pieces. 86 boxes. Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The collection consists of papers concerning British soldier and author T.E. Lawrence (1888-1935) including manuscripts (by and about Lawrence), correspondence (including over 150 letters by Lawrence), photographs, drawings, reproductions and ephemera. Also included in the collection is research material of various Lawrence collectors and scholars. Language: English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Boxes 82-86 -- Coin & Fine Art, Manuscript & Rare Book Dealers. Restricted to staff use only. These boxes include provenance, price and sale information; please see Container List for an item-level list of contents. Publication Rights All photocopies, for which the Huntington does not own the original manuscript, may not be copied in any way, as noted in the Container List and on the folders.
    [Show full text]
  • CHG Library Book List
    CHG Library Book List (Belgium), M. r. d. a. e. d. h. (1967). Galerie de l'Asie antérieure et de l'Iran anciens [des] Musées royaux d'art et d'histoire, Bruxelles, Musées royaux d'art et dʹhistoire, Parc du Cinquantenaire, 1967. Galerie de l'Asie antérieure et de l'Iran anciens [des] Musées royaux d'art et d'histoire by Musées royaux d'art et d'histoire (Belgium) (1967) (Director), T. P. F. H. (1968). The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin: Volume XXVI, Number 5. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art (January, 1968). The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin: Volume XXVI, Number 5 by Thomas P.F. Hoving (1968) (Director), T. P. F. H. (1973). The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin: Volume XXXI, Number 3. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art (Ed.), A. B. S. (2002). Persephone. U.S.A/ Cambridge, President and Fellows of Harvard College Puritan Press, Inc. (Ed.), A. D. (2005). From Byzantium to Modern Greece: Hellenic Art in Adversity, 1453-1830. /Benaki Museum. Athens, Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation. (Ed.), B. B. R. (2000). Christian VIII: The National Museum: Antiquities, Coins, Medals. Copenhagen, The National Museum of Denmark. (Ed.), J. I. (1999). Interviews with Ali Pacha of Joanina; in the autumn of 1812; with some particulars of Epirus, and the Albanians of the present day (Peter Oluf Brondsted). Athens, The Danish Institute at Athens. (Ed.), K. D. (1988). Antalya Museum. İstanbul, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Döner Sermaye İşletmeleri Merkez Müdürlüğü/ Ankara. (ed.), M. N. B. (Ocak- Nisan 2010). "Arkeoloji ve sanat. (Journal of Archaeology and Art): Ölümünün 100.Yıldönümünde Osman Hamdi Bey ve Kazıları." Arkeoloji Ve Sanat 133.
    [Show full text]