Pariahs , Tricksters, and the Subversion of Modernity: the Decolonial Borderland Na
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Pariahs , Tricksters, and the Subversion of Modernity: The Decolonial Borderland Narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra. Cuauhtémoc Thelonious Mexica A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Cynthia Steele, Chair Leroy Searle Devon Peña Gino Aisenberg Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Comparative Literature i © Copyright 2015 Cuauhtémoc Thelonious Mexica ii University of Washington Abstract Pariahs, Tricksters, and the Subversion of Modernity: The Decolonial Borderland Narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra. Cuauhtémoc Thelonious Mexica Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Cynthia Steele Department of Comparative Literature This dissertation analyzes how decolonial borderland narratives unveil the rhetoric and promises of modernity. In particular, how they reject Western ideals of progress, development, and civilization, while also conveying their own ways of being and independent thought in acts of epistemic disobedience and delinking. I examine these competing narratives through my developing idea of decolonial borderland scripts, which draws from Walter Mignolo’s decolonial theories that critique the logic of coloniality and the rhetoric of modernity. The chapters of my dissertation move from questions of theory and methodology in borderland narratives, specifically the works of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra, to diverse readings of migration, violence and criminality, in relation to epistemic disobedience, gender and ecology. iii Acknowledgements Cynthia Steele, mi capitana de barco, gracias por guiarme de puerto a puerto. Leroy Searle, thank you for amplifying my graduate training beyond the dissertation. Devon Peña, I value your mentorship and look forward to future collaborations. The Graduate Opportunities and Minority Achievement Program (GO-MAP) of the UW’s Graduate School provided financial support, professional training, and networking opportunities. In particular, I would like to thank GO-MAP’s Director, Cynthia Morales, for her unwavering support and motivation throughout my graduate tenure. The Center for Mexican American Studies (CMAS) at the University of Texas at Austin provided me with a short-term research fellowship (Summer 2012) through the CMAS- LLILAS Benson Latin American Studies and Collections Research Fellowship program. This fellowship allowed me to consult the Américo Paredes and Gloria Anzaldúa papers as a theoretical framework in borderlands thinking. Alas, I would like to thank all of my friends, family, and loved ones for their continuing love and support. 1 Table of Contents Page Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents 1 Introduction. Epistemic Delinking: Mignolo and Pluriversality 2 I. Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra 5 II. Border Theory and Literature 10 III. Chapter One Overview 13 IV. Chapter Two Overview 15 V. Chapter Three Overview 19 Chapter One. Decolonial Border Thinking: Mapping Autonomous Genealogies of Thought 22 I. Border Dwellers in El jardín del Edén 32 II. Shifting the Geography of Reasoning in Sin dejar huella. 39 Chapter 2. Sicaresque Sagas: The Decolonial Narco Narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra 53 I. North/South Asymmetries: Mercantile Ethics and Murderous Codes 58 II. Parra and the Narcobildungsroman 66 III. The Formation of a Sicario in Nostalgia de la sombra 69 IV. With His Cattle Gun in His Hand: The Assassin as a Radically Autonomous Interpellator 84 Chapter 3. Subverted Modernities in the Decolonial Borderland Narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra 108 I. From Southern Gothic to Borderland Narratives: Cormac McCarthy’s Fiction 112 II. All the Pretty Horses 122 III. The Crossing: Border and Indigenous Epistemologies 132 IV. The Borderland Narratives of Eduardo Antonio Parra 137 V. El pozo 142 VI. El cristo de San Buenaventura 150 Conclusion 156 Works Consulted 164 2 Introduction: Epistemic Delinking The late Lakota theologian of liberation, Richard Twiss, in an online video titled A Theology of Manifest Destiny, cogently argues that biblical narratives of exodus and chosen-ness guide the logic of Manifest Destiny, while host nations (natives) have historically been represented as Canaanites who impede the building of a kingdom of heaven, especially in the North American context. North American continental expansion is, thus, articulated as a civilizing mission steeped in the rhetoric of modernity. This dissertation, through the North American borderland narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra and decolonial theory, will unveil the hidden side of modernity, which is the logic of coloniality. My theoretical framework, which I outline extensively in chapter one, is rooted in Walter Mignolo’s critique of modernity, most recently outlined in The Darker Side of Modernity (2011). Decoloniality, in sum, has “the analytic task of unveiling the logic of coloniality and the prospective task of contributing to build a world in which many worlds coexist” (Mignolo, 54). Pluriversality is a world where many worlds coexist, rather than one conceptualized and governed through one self-congratulatory narrative of universality. Borderland narratives, in contrast to Western and Border Literature and rooted in border thinking, are decolonial in that they highlight a multiplicity of epistemologies that co-exist within and across the temporal spatial boundaries created by the imposition of difference as a measure of modernity. Whereas the rhetoric of modernity and the logic of coloniality are present in the borderland narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra, I argue that their border dwellers are the pariahs of modernity. Moreover, their stories transgress and circumvent binary values and ideas. The borderland narratives of McCarthy 3 and Parra challenge national interpretations of the borderlands while becoming, in turn, transnational narratives that delineate national literary projects, while also juxtaposing colonial legacies. This dissertation asserts that decolonial borderland narratives, in their pluriversality, delink from their colonial legacies and national ideologies, as manifested in the narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra. It will be organized around the themes of border thinking, narcoviolence, and modernity/coloniality. The dissertation will be divided into three chapters. The introduction will contextualize the works of McCarthy and Parra as decolonial borderland narratives, while also providing an overview of border theory and literature. The first chapter, on defining the borderland narrative, will provide the theoretical background and framework for the literary analysis and critique. The remaining chapters will contain the bulk of my contribution to the field via the analysis and critique of the themes of narcoviolence and subverted modernities elucidated by the respective authors. The canonical, primary and secondary, texts of border theory and border literature focus primarily on the fiction and criticism of two major authors, one writing from north of the line (the U.S., Cormac McCarthy), and the other writing from the South (Mexico, Parra). Of the many themes—violence and landscape—that unite these two authors, I am particularly interested in contextualizing their respective decolonial borderland narratives within and across the colonial matrix of power, which is the rhetoric of modernity and the logic of coloniality. Each author offers a unique vision of these overriding themes and their various manifestations across the U.S.—Mexican borderlands. Whereas Parra’s characters are lured by the modernity of the U.S., McCarthy’s Southwestern natives take refuge in the 4 “traditional” aspects of northern Mexican society that are delinked from projects of modernity, or what I refer to as unfulfilled modernities. Most, if not all, of the worthwhile criticism devoted to both Parra and McCarthy is limited to their respective national realms, and no one has yet undertaken a comparison of these two authors, or explored the transnational dimension of their works, which a comparison of their works will help to reveal. My analyses will aim to address that significant void, while contributing to current discussions related to the work of these two major authors within decolonial thinking. 5 Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra The transnational borderlands narratives of Cormac McCarthy and Eduardo Antonio Parra undermine nation-based concepts of literature, while at the same time eschewing the exoticizing quest for the Other. Their narratives present contrasts between rural and urban spaces, as well as between U.S. and Mexican varieties of negative valuations of modernity, emanating from urban spaces and featuring sympathetic representations of wilderness and rural spaces as victims of modern-urban reform. In McCarthy’s U.S.-based narratives, the critique of modernizing projects is largely epistemological, as demonstrated in his characters’ philosophical introspections, and to a lesser extent, ecological. In Parra’s Mexican-based fiction, in contrast, these epistemological and ecological issues are less foregrounded, though the arid desert “wasteland” forms a constant backdrop for his characters’ travails. Instead Parra focuses on issues of social equality, centering on the resentment and (self-) destructive rebellion on the part of rural populations against projects of modernity dating back to