DOCSLIB.ORG

Measurement of Viscosities of Saturated Methane-Nonane Liquid Mixtures at Elevated Pressures With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measurement of Viscosities of Saturated Methane-Nonane Liquid Mixtures at Elevated Pressures With MEASUREMENT OF VISCOSITIES OF SATURATED METHANE-NONANE LIQUID MIXTURES AT ELEVATED PRESSURES WITH A CAPILLARY NI$CQ'v1ETER•·. By STUART EDWARD BENNETT Professional Degree Chemical and Petroleum Refining Engineering Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado 1966 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August, 1969 OKI.AH OMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY NOV 5 1969 ~· ~,.,, .. , . .. , .,. '· ·---z·-.; ."'··, '".-;·.l,~~.... ... w,•• -,.;.•<;;t MEASUREMENT OF VISCOSITIES OF SATURATED METHANE-NONANE LIQUID MIXTURES AT ELEVATED PRESSURES WITH A CAPILLARY VISCOMETER Thesis Approved: hesis dviser ~t{tL Deana.a.~ of the Graduate College 729859 ii PREFACE The effect of viscosity on mass transfer rates in pro­ cesses such as absorption has been recognized by the hydro­ carbon processing industries. However, the behavior of viscosity under varying conditions of temperature, pressure, and composition is only partially understood. In particular, data and correlations are needed to more completely under­ stand the change in viscosity with composition for typical hydrocarbon absorption process components. This study presents an examination of the viscosity changes of liquid methane-nonane mixtures at pressures up to 1200 psia and . over a temperature r~nge o·f -30°F · to 78°F, The experimental apparatus built for the investigation used a Zeitfuchs style capillary viscometer installed in a pressure cell fitted with appropriate equipment to control operating conditions. I am indebted to Profi R. N. Maddox for the advice and assistance he has provided while serving as my research ad­ viser for this project. I would also like to thank Prof. J.B. West for his assistance while serving on my thesis review committee and for his cooperation during my transfer from the-University of Illinois. Also, my.research associ­ ate, James R.. Dearo, deserves special mention and thanks for invaluable assistance and patience during this investigation. iii The assistance of the OSU Research Apparatus Development Laboratory personnel during construction of the equipment is also recognized and appreciated. I thank the Natural Gas Processors Association for pro­ viding funds to finance the purchase and construction of the experimental apparatus required in the investigation. The financial assistance provided by the School of Chemical Engineering of Oklahoma State University in the form of a research assistantship and the fellowship provided by the National Collegiate Athletic Association were greatly appre­ ciated. I especially wish to thank my wife, Kathy, and my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Bennett, for their encour­ agement, confidence, and advice.during my period of graduate study. 'TABLB OF· CONl'iNTS · Chapter . ·. Page l NTROOUCTIQN. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ... l I.I. .LITERATURE SURVEY • • . .. .. .. • • • • . ..... ... 3 HistoricalDevelopt11ent ••••••••••••••. • · 3 Previous Experimental .Investigations • • • • • • . • • 7 Viscosity Correlations, •••••••.••••••• · 9 EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS. .. • • III. ,• .• . ... Materi*ls Tested •••••••••••••••• , , 18 Pressure Distribution System • ·• • . • • • • • • • • • 18 Pressure Cell. ~ •••• · • ·••• • • • • • • • • • • 19 · Liquid Injection System ••.•.. • • • • • • • • • • • 24 ·viscometer.•. , • • ;. • • .• • • • • • • • • • • ,., • • . 24· · ·. Temperature Controls . ~ . • . • • • · • • • . • • • • • • • • 28 Lighti~ • • • • . • .•. , , .·• • • • • • • • • • .• • • . • 30 EXPERIMENTAL PRO:SDURE •• IV. .. • • . ' ~ .•. .. .. • • • 31. System Preparation , . • . • • • • • • : • • .. • • ,. • • • • . 31 Measurement.. • • ~ ·• · • • • • • , • • • • • • • • ., ·• 33 DhmantU~ arid Cle•ning • • ·• • .,. • • • • . • • • • • .''·34 •' . v. RESULTS. AND DISCUSSION: OP RESULTS •• • • •.............. 3~ Construction of Equipment. · • .• • • • • • • • • " • , 35 Collectio,n of Viscqs1ty Data • , • • • , • • • •. • • .37 Absolute Viscosity a,havior. , • • , • • • • • .., • • 39 Surfa~e .. Teneion Viscosity Cor:rela'!:lon.~ , •••••• · 48 .•. •· ... •·. 52 • ... ... • • .. ~TURe. ·:.·. -~·-. ~ .... ,: ·• ·• •• .- ~_. • ·• ·•· -• ......... .-· ••••.• !$7· . •· ..... .. .. • • . .. .. .. .. ..... ' . • . • r .59 •..j .• •.•. · .• . • ti 42 -~ ' ,. 64 APPENDxx·,. ·""'. MEASUREMENT'REPROOUCIBILitv.. .·· ... ·.: ....... : . .. .. .. .. .. ··~ .. ~- . ~ ..... ~ ....... 49 Af'Pllf)IX D ··l!XPSRIMENTAL AND·CALCULATEO DATA oi • :• ·72. •. ' : . •·• ', .·. ..... , . ·. ... .· ' .111 . '. :~PI-U .. & •• ANALYSl,S .OP .oas. ·~• , ~ ..; ,: .~ .. ~ .·... ·. .. .. •·. .· 80 LIST OF TABLES . Table Page L Tabulated Viscosity Measurements q 41 II. Least Squares Analysis for Surface Tension - Viscosity Correlation .. ,, o • • • • • 49 I I I. Heise Gauge Calibration, , o 63 IVo Study of Reproducibility of Viscometer Measurements . o •••••••• o ••• 66 V. Viscometer Calibration. 70 VL Calculated Viscometer Constants .. I]) Q " 0 71 VII, Experimental Flow Times" .... " 73 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Schematic Diagram of Experimental Apparatus~ .. 20 2. Detail of Pressure Cell .. 21 Detail of Observation Port Assembly .. 22 4. Schematic Drawing of Liquid Injection System 25 5. Zeitfuchs Style Viscotneter ........ 27 6. Kinematic Viscosity of Metha'ne-Nonane Bubble Po .int ti 9 O III O e 9 .. fi1 O ' GI • 'el 1!1 fl e C II GI «I 38 7' ·Absolute Viscosity of.Methane-Nonane Bubble Point Mixtures as a Function of Pressure .•. 43 Absolute Viscosity of Methane~Nonane Bubble Point Mixtures as a Function of Temperature. 44 9. Absolute Viscosity of Methane-Nonane Bubble Point Mixtures as a Function of Composition .. 45 10. Absolute Viscosity of Methane-Nonane Bubble. Poin.t Mixtures as a Function of Density ..•. 46 lL Absolute Viscosity of Methane-Nonane Bubble Point Mixtures as a Function of Composition and Pressure . · . ·. • . 47 '.t.2 ~ Logarithmof Surface Tension as a Function of Reciprocal Viscosity for Methane-Nonane Mixtures Q 111 0 tl 9 . 0 0 ~ II O ID C Q ti O e II . Q e so 13. Logarithm of Surface Tension as a Function of Reciprocal Viscosity for Methane~Butane MiX.ture-s ID a_ e GI C «i O e II II O e O Ii o • 0 0 11 51 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In September of 1964, Dr. James H~ Weber of the Univer­ sity of Nebraska prepared a literature survey for the Natural Gas Processors Association (NGPA) which was entitled Factors Affecting Absorber Performance (34.) .. On.pq.,ge]7. of the survey, Dr. Weber'referred to the importance of viscosity in determining mass transfer rates which in turn affect tray efficiencies in absorbers. In order to understand the effect of viscosity more completely, the Absorption Committee of NGPA desired vis­ cosity data for typical absorption oil components. The particular information.required by the NGPA was a determina­ tion of the.change in.vi~cosity of absorption oil-components as.the concentration of lighter hydrocarbons in the oil varied •. Primary emphasis was to .be placed on the study of binary liquid systems at equilibrium conditions. Measure­ ments were to be conducted in a hydrocarbon gas atmosphere (methane) at pressures up to 1500 psia and over a temperature range of -so0 p· to 1so°F. In this study the following procedure was followed. to obtain the required information. 1 2 1. An apparatus was built which used a capillary viscometer for obtaining viscosity data for the. liquid phase of a binary hydrocarbon system (n-methane and n-nonane) at the required temp- erature and pressure conditions. 2, Experimental values of kinematic viscosity for the methane-n-nonarie system over the required ranges of temperature and pressure were obtained with the apparatus .. 3, The absolute viscosity was calculated from kine­ matic viscosity and its variations with temperature, pressu_re, and compositions were studied. ';: 4. Absolute viscosity and surface tension were correlated . • ·1:·. CHAPTER II LITERATURE SURVEY Literature concerning this study of viscosity can be divided into three categories. One category encompasses the historical deveiopment of-viscometry in general and the capillary viscometer in particular. The second category in~ eludes the experimental work that has been conducted either under high pressures or with hydrocarbon mixtures; The third category includes past attempts to correlate viscosity data. A discussion of the literature in_all three categor- ies is presented in this chapter. Historical Development The foundations of viscometry were est~blished by Newton in the 1700's when he postulated his hypothesis of viscosity (21.} .•- _Barr (1) pres~nts the British ··Standards Institution .:frite'fpretai:16:n of· 'Newton's def:i.nition' cif the co~ . - efficient of ~isc6sity.~ ~ "The coefficient of viscosity is the numerical value of the tangential force on a unit-area of-­ two parallel planes at a unit distance apart · when the space bet~een these planes is filled with the liquid in question and one .of them moves with unit velocity in its own plane relatively to .the other." · The mathematical expression of Newton's hypothesis as re- 3 4 ported by Barr is (1) F = Force required v = Velocity of the plane X -- distance between.planes ~=dynamic or absolute viscosity A quantity which also appears· in.the present viscosity study is the "kinematic viscosity,'')), equal to the dynamic vis­ cosity divided by the density,p, ·of the_fluid. The common tlnit of dynamic viscosityJ)A, is called a poise in the cgs system (gm cm-l sec- 1). The corresponding unit of kinematic iiscosity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Low Temperature Structure of Nonane-1,9-Diaminium Chloride Chloroacetate: Hydroxyacetic Acid (1:1)
    J Chem Crystallogr (2011) 41:703–707 DOI 10.1007/s10870-010-9957-6 ORIGINAL PAPER A Low Temperature Structure of Nonane-1,9-Diaminium Chloride Chloroacetate: Hydroxyacetic Acid (1:1) Agnieszka Paul • Maciej Kubicki Received: 24 February 2010 / Accepted: 31 December 2010 / Published online: 14 January 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The crystal structure of nonane-1,9-diaminium protons and to form salts with both, organic and inorganic chloride chloroacetate–hydroxyacetic acid (1:1) was deter- acids, together with a significant flexibility of the chain mined by X-ray diffraction at 100(1)K. The asymmetric fragment and tendency towards creation of the highly unit is composed of diaminium dication, chloroacetate and symmetric networks, can be used in so-called crystal chloride anions, and neutral hydroxyacetic acid molecule. engineering [2], i.e. in designing new materials with The aliphatic chain of 1,9-diamine is fully extended and it expected features. Such a predictable motifs in the crystal deviates only slightly from the perfect all-trans confor- structures, giving rise to a layer structure, were already mation. The two acidic residues are also nearly planar. The investigated in the series of hexane-1,6-diamine and layer structure is obtained as a consequence of hydrogen butane-1,4-diamine salts [3, 4]. bond interactions of a different lengths, with N–H and O–H Only five structures deposited in the Cambridge Struc- groups playing the role of donors and oxygen atoms and tural Database [5] (no multiple determinations, herein and chloride cations as acceptors.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET 1,9-Dibromo-Nonane-2,8-Dione According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex II, As Amended
    Revision date: 03/01/2020 Revision: 1 SAFETY DATA SHEET 1,9-Dibromo-nonane-2,8-dione According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex II, as amended. Commission Regulation (EU) No 2015/830 of 28 May 2015. SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product name 1,9-Dibromo-nonane-2,8-dione Product number FD173289 CAS number 91492-76-1 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses Laboratory reagent. Manufacture of substances. Research and development. 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Supplier Carbosynth Ltd 8&9 Old Station Business Park Compton Berkshire RG20 6NE UK +44 1635 578444 +44 1635 579444 [email protected] 1.4. Emergency telephone number Emergency telephone +44 7887 998634 SECTION 2: Hazards identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture Classification (EC 1272/2008) Physical hazards Not Classified Health hazards Not Classified Environmental hazards Not Classified Additional information Caution. Not fully tested. 2.2. Label elements Hazard statements NC Not Classified 2.3. Other hazards No data available. SECTION 3: Composition/information on ingredients 3.1. Substances Product name 1,9-Dibromo-nonane-2,8-dione 1/8 Revision date: 03/01/2020 Revision: 1 1,9-Dibromo-nonane-2,8-dione CAS number 91492-76-1 Chemical formula C₉H₁₄Br₂O₂ SECTION 4: First aid measures 4.1. Description of first aid measures General information Get medical advice/attention if you feel unwell. Inhalation Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Alkanes Alkanes from Carbon and Hydrogen
    Chapter 2: Alkanes Alkanes from Carbon and Hydrogen •Alkanes are carbon compounds that contain only single bonds. •The simplest alkanes are hydrocarbons – compounds that contain only carbon and hydrogen. •Hydrocarbons are used mainly as fuels, solvents and lubricants: H H H H H H H H H H H H C H C C H C C C C H H C C C C C H H H C C H H H H H H CH2 H CH3 H H H H CH3 # of carbons boiling point range Use 1-4 <20 °C fuel (gasses such as methane, propane, butane) 5-6 30-60 solvents (petroleum ether) 6-7 60-90 solvents (ligroin) 6-12 85-200 fuel (gasoline) 12-15 200-300 fuel (kerosene) 15-18 300-400 fuel (heating oil) 16-24 >400 lubricating oil, asphalt Hydrocarbons Formula Prefix Suffix Name Structure H CH4 meth- -ane methane H C H H C H eth- -ane ethane 2 6 H3C CH3 C3H8 prop- -ane propane C4H10 but- -ane butane C5H12 pent- -ane pentane C6H14 hex- -ane hexane C7H16 hept- -ane heptane C8H18 oct- -ane octane C9H20 non- -ane nonane C10H22 dec- -ane decane Hydrocarbons Formula Prefix Suffix Name Structure H CH4 meth- -ane methane H C H H H H C2H6 eth- -ane ethane H C C H H H H C H prop- -ane propane 3 8 H3C C CH3 or H H H C H 4 10 but- -ane butane H3C C C CH3 or H H H C H 4 10 but- -ane butane? H3C C CH3 or CH3 HydHrydorcocaarrbobnos ns Formula Prefix Suffix Name Structure H CH4 meth- -ane methane H C H H H H C2H6 eth- -ane ethane H C C H H H H C3H8 prop- -ane propane H3C C CH3 or H H H C H 4 10 but- -ane butane H3C C C CH3 or H H H C H 4 10 but- -ane iso-butane H3C C CH3 or CH3 HydHrydoroccarbrobnsons Formula Prefix Suffix Name Structure H H
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Nomenclature: Naming Organic Molecules
    Organic Nomenclature: Naming Organic Molecules Mild Vegetable Alkali Aerated Alkali What’s in a name? Tartarin Glauber's Alkahest Alkahest of Van Helmot Fixed Vegetable Alkali Russian Pot Ash Cendres Gravellees Alkali Mild Vegetable Oil of Tartar Pearl Ash Tartar Alkahest of Reapour K2CO3 Alkali of Reguline Caustic Sal Juniperi Potassium Carbonate Ash ood Alkali of Wine Lees Salt of Tachenius W Fixed Sal Tartari Sal Gentianae Alkali Salt German Ash Salt of Wormwood Cineres Clavellati Sal Guaiaci exSal Ligno Alkanus Vegetablis IUPAC Rules for naming organic molecules International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists 3 Name Molecular Prefix Formula Methane CH4 Meth Ethane C2H6 Eth Alkanes Propane C3H8 Prop Butane C4H10 But CnH2n+2 Pentane C5H12 Pent Hexane C6H14 Hex Heptane C7H16 Hept Octane C8H18 Oct Nonane C9H20 Non Decane C10H22 Dec 4 Structure of linear alkanes propane butane pentane hexane heptane octane nonane decane 5 Constitutional Isomers: molecules with same molecular formula but differ in the way in which the atoms are connected to each other 6 Physical properties of constiutional isomers 7 Isomers n # of isomers 1 1 2 1 The more carbons in a 3 1 molecule, the more 4 2 possible ways to put 5 3 them together. 6 5 7 9 8 18 9 35 10 75 15 4,347 25 36,797,588 8 Naming more complex molecules hexane C6H14 9 Naming more complex molecules Step 1: identify the longest continuous linear chain: this will be the root name: this is the root name 2 4 6 longest chain = 6 (hexane) 1 3 5 2 4 3 4 3 2 2 1 5 4 1 3 5 correct 1 incorrect longest chain = 5 (pentane) longest chain = 5 (pentane) 1 3 1 2 2 3 4 4 longest chain = 4 (butane) longest chain = 4 (butane) 10 Naming more complex molecules Step 2: identify all functional group (the groups not part of the “main chain”) CH3 2 4 4 3 2 1 5 1 3 5 CH3 main chain: pentane main chain: pentane CH3 1 3 1 2 2 3 4 4 CH3 CH3 CH3 main chain: butane main chain: butane 11 Alkyl groups: fragments of alkanes H H empty space (point where it H C H H C attaches to something else) H H methane methyl CH4 CH3 12 More generally..
    [Show full text]
  • Modular and Selective Biosynthesis of Gasoline-Range Alkanes
    Modular and selective biosynthesis of gasoline-range alkanes The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Sheppard, Micah J., Aditya M. Kunjapur, and Kristala L.J. Prather. “Modular and Selective Biosynthesis of Gasoline-Range Alkanes.” Metabolic Engineering 33 (January 2016): 28–40. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.10.010 Publisher Elsevier Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108077 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 1 Title: Modular and selective biosynthesis of gasoline-range alkanes 2 Authors: Micah J. Sheppard1, 2†, Aditya M. Kunjapur1, 3†, Kristala L. J. Prather1, 3* 3 Affiliations: 4 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, 5 USA 6 2. Present Address: Ginkgo BioWorks, 27 Drydock Avenue, 8th floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02210, 7 USA 8 3. Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 10 11 †These authors contributed equally to this work. 12 * Corresponding author: 13 Department of Chemical Engineering 14 77 Massachusetts Avenue 15 Room E17-504G 16 Cambridge, MA 02139 17 Phone: 617.253.1950 18 Fax: 617.258.5042 19 Email: [email protected] 20 Keywords: alkanes, gasoline, biofuel, E. coli, metabolic engineering, synthetic biology 21 1 22 Abstract: 23 Typical renewable liquid fuel alternatives to gasoline are not entirely compatible with current 24 infrastructure. We have engineered Escherichia coli to selectively produce alkanes found in gasoline 25 (propane, butane, pentane, heptane, and nonane) from renewable substrates such as glucose or glycerol.
    [Show full text]
  • Polycyclic Aromatic Compound (PAC) Standards and Standard Mixtures Solutions for a Greener World Introduction
    Polycyclic Aromatic Compound (PAC) Standards and Standard Mixtures Solutions for a Greener World Introduction Polycyclic Aromatic Compound (PAC) Standards and Standard Mixtures isotope.com 13C-Labeled Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Standards CIL, in cooperation with Cerilliant Corporation, is pleased to In the chromatogram for the deuterated benzo[a]pyrene, the offer 13C-labeled polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as a proton losses at M-2, M-4, etc. are supplemented with proton superior alternative to deuterated standards. Although CIL has losses of M-1, M-3, etc. This represents a loss of deuterons traditionally produced high-quality deuterated PAH analogs, from incompletely deuterated species. As a result, the profile of some analysts have observed back-exchange of proton for the deuterated material does not correspond exactly to that of deuterium under harsh extraction conditions and in certain the unlabeled material. 13C-labeled benzo[a]pyrene, however, matrices. If precise quantitation is required, or complete will match the unlabeled material with the 4 AMU shift being recovery information is needed, the non-exchangeable the only difference between the two profiles. 13C isotope label is the right standard to use. Hydroxy PAHs Deuterium Back-Exchange PAH exposure occurs through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal While analysts have been using deuterated PAH standards contact. In the body, these compounds are predominantly for years, labile deuterons are susceptible to back-exchange. metabolized as epoxides, which are converted to phenol The phenomenon is particularly likely to occur in acidic or (hydroxy) and dihydrodiol derivatives. The hydroxylated catalytic matrices, when the importance of a reliable internal metabolites of the PAHs are excreted in human urine both standard is greatest.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbons, Bp 36°-216 °C 1500
    HYDROCARBONS, BP 36°-216 °C 1500 FORMULA: Table 1 MW: Table 1 CAS: Table 1 RTECS: Table 1 METHOD: 1500, Issue 3 EVALUATION: PARTIAL Issue 1: 15 August 1990 Issue 3: 15 March 2003 OSHA : Table 2 PROPERTIES: Table 1 NIOSH: Table 2 ACGIH: Table 2 COMPOUNDS: cyclohexane n-heptane n-octane (Synonyms in Table 1) cyclohexene n-hexane n-pentane n-decane methylcyclohexane n-undecane n-dodecane n-nonane SAMPLING MEASUREMENT SAMPLER: SOLID SORBENT TUBE [1] TECHNIQUE: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, FID [1] (coconut shell charcoal, 100 mg/50 mg) ANALYTE: Hydrocarbons listed above FLOW RATE: Table 3 DESORPTION: 1 mL CS2; stand 30 min VOL-MIN: Table 3 -MAX: Table 3 INJECTION VOLUME: 1 µL SHIPMENT: Routine TEMPERATURES SAMPLE -INJECTION: 250 °C STABILITY: 30 days @ 5 °C -DETECTOR: 300 °C -COLUMN: 35 °C (8 min) - 230 °C (1 min) BLANKS: 10% of samples ramp (7.5 °C /min) CARRIER GAS: Helium, 1 mL/min ACCURACY COLUMN: Capillary, fused silica, 30 m x 0.32-mm RANGE STUDIED: Table 3 ID; 3.00-µm film 100% dimethyl polysiloxane BIAS: Table 3 CALIBRATION: Solutions of analytes in CS2 Ö OVERALL PRECISION ( rT): Table 3 RANGE: Table 4 ACCURACY: Table 3 ESTIMATED LOD: Table 4 þ PRECISION ( r): Table 4 APPLICABILITY: This method may be used for simultaneous measurements; however, interactions between analytes may reduce breakthrough volumes and alter analyte recovery. INTERFERENCES: At high humidity, the breakthrough volumes may be reduced. Other volatile organic solvents such as alcohols, ketones, ethers, and halogenated hydrocarbons are potential interferences. OTHER METHODS: This method is an update for NMAM 1500 issued on August 15, 1994 [2] which was based on methods from the 2nd edition of the NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods: S28, cyclohexane [3]; S82, cyclohexene [3]; S89, heptane [3]; S90, hexane [3]; S94, methylcyclohexane [3]; S378, octane [4]; and S379, pentane [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2. Hazards Identification OSHA/HCS Status : This Material Is Considered Hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Flammable Liquefied Gas Mixture: 2-Methylpentane / 2,2-Dimethylbutane / 2, 3-Dimethylbutane / 3-Methylpentane / Benzene / Carbon Dioxide / Decane / Dodecane / Ethane / Ethyl Benzene / Heptane / Hexane / Isobutane / Isooctane / Isopentane / M- Xylene / Methane / N-Butane / N-Pentane / Neopentane / Nitrogen / Nonane / O- Xylene / Octane / P-Xylene / Pentadecane / Propane / Tetradecane / Toluene / Tridecane / Undecane Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Flammable Liquefied Gas Mixture: 2-Methylpentane / 2,2-Dimethylbutane / 2, 3-Dimethylbutane / 3-Methylpentane / Benzene / Carbon Dioxide / Decane / Dodecane / Ethane / Ethyl Benzene / Heptane / Hexane / Isobutane / Isooctane / Isopentane / M- Xylene / Methane / N-Butane / N-Pentane / Neopentane / Nitrogen / Nonane / O-Xylene / Octane / P-Xylene / Pentadecane / Propane / Tetradecane / Toluene / Tridecane / Undecane Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Liquefied gas Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 018818 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : FLAMMABLE GASES - Category 1 substance or mixture GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Liquefied gas SKIN IRRITATION - Category 2 GERM CELL MUTAGENICITY - Category 1 CARCINOGENICITY - Category 1 TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION (Fertility) - Category 2 TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION (Unborn child) - Category 2 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (SINGLE EXPOSURE) (Narcotic effects) - Category 3 SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY (REPEATED EXPOSURE) - Category 2 AQUATIC HAZARD (ACUTE) - Category 2 AQUATIC HAZARD (LONG-TERM) - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Extremely flammable gas. May form explosive mixtures with air.
    [Show full text]
  • JUN I 13998 Scienct LIBRARIES This Doctoral Thesis Has Been Examined by a Committee of the Department of Chemistry As Follows
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANOTIN REAGENTS FOR ORGANIC SYNTHESIS by David Scott Hays B. S. Chemistry, University of Illinois Submitted to the Department of Chemistry in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ORGANIC CHEMISTRY at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 1998 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998 All rights reserved Signature of Author Department of Chemistry May 14, 1998 Certified by Gregory C. Fu t' Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Dietmar Seyferth Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students JUN I 13998 scienct LIBRARIES This doctoral thesis has been examined by a committee of the Department of Chemistry as follows: Professor Peter H. Seeberger I_ _ /1 Chairman Professor Gregory C. Fu J _J Thesis Supervisor Professor Rick L. Danheiser THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANOTIN REAGENTS FOR ORGANIC SYNTHESIS by David Scott Hays Submitted to the Department of Chemistry on May 14, 1998 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT A method for the intramolecular pinacol coupling of dialdehydes and ketoaldehydes is described. The method was found to be useful for synthesizing 1,2-cyclopentanediols with very high degrees of diastereoselectivity in favor of the cis stereochemistry. 1,2- Cyclohexanediols were generated with lower degrees of stereoselection. This free radical chain process involves as the key steps: 1) an intramolecular addition of a tin ketyl radical to a pendant carbonyl group, followed by 2) a rapid intramolecular homolytic displacement by an oxygen radical at the tin center to liberate an alkyl radical. The development of a Bu 3 SnH-catalyzed carbon-carbon bond forming reaction (the reductive cyclization of enals and enones) is described, followed by a catalytic variant of the Barton-McCombie deoxygenation reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Chemical Schemes Used in Photochemical Modelling — Swedish Conditions
    VL-oferUriii xvl-B— / 335 Comparison of Chemical Schemes Used in Photochemical Modelling — Swedish Conditions Karin PleijelJohannaAltenstedt and Yvonne Andersson-Skold DmsmmoH of this document is unlimited Goteborg, October 1996 B 1235 IVL SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE________________ Organisation/Organization RAPPORTSAMMANFATTNING Institute! for Vatten- och Luftvardsforskning Report Summary Adress/Address Projekttitel/Project title Box 47086 Forenklad kemisk modeliering for halter av ozon 402 58 GOTEBORG och PAN i Sverige. Telefonnr/Telephone 031-46 00 80 Anslagsgivare for projektet/Project sponsor Naturvardsverket Rapportforfattare, author Karin Pleijel, Johanna Altenstedt and Yvonne Andersson-Skold Rapportens titel och undertitel/Title and subtitle of the report Comparison of Chemical Schemes Used in Photochemical Modelling - Swedish Conditions Sammanfattning/Summary The compressed chemical description used in three internationally well-known models, i.e. the EMEP, CBM-IV and RADM-II models were set up in a model frame being representative for Swedish conditions. The results from the use of these compressed chemical schemes were compared with the results when an explicit scheme with a high level of detail i.e. the IVL model in the 1995 version, was used in the same model set-up. In addition, a new approach to compressed chemical modelling was presented, based on the Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), and the results were compared with the results from the well established compressed schemes. The compressed scheme used in the EMEP model (1993 version), including some minor modifications in order to make the models strictly comparable, was seen to be in good to excellent agreement with the results from the IVL model for most of the studied scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compatibility Chart
    Chemical Compatibility Chart 1 Inorganic Acids 1 2 Organic acids X 2 3 Caustics X X 3 4 Amines & Alkanolamines X X 4 5 Halogenated Compounds X X X 5 6 Alcohols, Glycols & Glycol Ethers X 6 7 Aldehydes X X X X X 7 8 Ketone X X X X 8 9 Saturated Hydrocarbons 9 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons X 10 11 Olefins X X 11 12 Petrolum Oils 12 13 Esters X X X 13 14 Monomers & Polymerizable Esters X X X X X X 14 15 Phenols X X X X 15 16 Alkylene Oxides X X X X X X X X 16 17 Cyanohydrins X X X X X X X 17 18 Nitriles X X X X X 18 19 Ammonia X X X X X X X X X 19 20 Halogens X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 21 Ethers X X X 21 22 Phosphorus, Elemental X X X X 22 23 Sulfur, Molten X X X X X X 23 24 Acid Anhydrides X X X X X X X X X X 24 X Represents Unsafe Combinations Represents Safe Combinations Group 1: Inorganic Acids Dichloropropane Chlorosulfonic acid Dichloropropene Hydrochloric acid (aqueous) Ethyl chloride Hydrofluoric acid (aqueous) Ethylene dibromide Hydrogen chloride (anhydrous) Ethylene dichloride Hydrogen fluoride (anhydrous) Methyl bromide Nitric acid Methyl chloride Oleum Methylene chloride Phosphoric acid Monochlorodifluoromethane Sulfuric acid Perchloroethylene Propylene dichloride Group 2: Organic Acids 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Acetic acid 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Butyric acid (n-) Trichloroethylene Formic acid Trichlorofluoromethane Propionic acid Rosin Oil Group 6: Alcohols, Glycols and Glycol Ethers Tall oil Allyl alcohol Amyl alcohol Group 3: Caustics 1,4-Butanediol Caustic potash solution Butyl alcohol (iso, n, sec, tert) Caustic soda solution Butylene
    [Show full text]
  • Dielectric Constant Chart
    Dielectric Constants of Common Materials DIELECTRIC MATERIALS DEG. F CONSTANT ABS RESIN, LUMP 2.4-4.1 ABS RESIN, PELLET 1.5-2.5 ACENAPHTHENE 70 3 ACETAL 70 3.6 ACETAL BROMIDE 16.5 ACETAL DOXIME 68 3.4 ACETALDEHYDE 41 21.8 ACETAMIDE 68 4 ACETAMIDE 180 59 ACETAMIDE 41 ACETANILIDE 71 2.9 ACETIC ACID 68 6.2 ACETIC ACID (36 DEGREES F) 36 4.1 ACETIC ANHYDRIDE 66 21 ACETONE 77 20.7 ACETONE 127 17.7 ACETONE 32 1.0159 ACETONITRILE 70 37.5 ACETOPHENONE 75 17.3 ACETOXIME 24 3 ACETYL ACETONE 68 23.1 ACETYL BROMIDE 68 16.5 ACETYL CHLORIDE 68 15.8 ACETYLE ACETONE 68 25 ACETYLENE 32 1.0217 ACETYLMETHYL HEXYL KETONE 66 27.9 ACRYLIC RESIN 2.7 - 4.5 ACTEAL 21 3.6 ACTETAMIDE 4 AIR 1 AIR (DRY) 68 1.000536 ALCOHOL, INDUSTRIAL 16-31 ALKYD RESIN 3.5-5 ALLYL ALCOHOL 58 22 ALLYL BROMIDE 66 7 ALLYL CHLORIDE 68 8.2 ALLYL IODIDE 66 6.1 ALLYL ISOTHIOCYANATE 64 17.2 ALLYL RESIN (CAST) 3.6 - 4.5 ALUMINA 9.3-11.5 ALUMINA 4.5 ALUMINA CHINA 3.1-3.9 ALUMINUM BROMIDE 212 3.4 ALUMINUM FLUORIDE 2.2 ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE 2.2 ALUMINUM OLEATE 68 2.4 1 Dielectric Constants of Common Materials DIELECTRIC MATERIALS DEG. F CONSTANT ALUMINUM PHOSPHATE 6 ALUMINUM POWDER 1.6-1.8 AMBER 2.8-2.9 AMINOALKYD RESIN 3.9-4.2 AMMONIA -74 25 AMMONIA -30 22 AMMONIA 40 18.9 AMMONIA 69 16.5 AMMONIA (GAS?) 32 1.0072 AMMONIUM BROMIDE 7.2 AMMONIUM CHLORIDE 7 AMYL ACETATE 68 5 AMYL ALCOHOL -180 35.5 AMYL ALCOHOL 68 15.8 AMYL ALCOHOL 140 11.2 AMYL BENZOATE 68 5.1 AMYL BROMIDE 50 6.3 AMYL CHLORIDE 52 6.6 AMYL ETHER 60 3.1 AMYL FORMATE 66 5.7 AMYL IODIDE 62 6.9 AMYL NITRATE 62 9.1 AMYL THIOCYANATE 68 17.4 AMYLAMINE 72 4.6 AMYLENE 70 2 AMYLENE BROMIDE 58 5.6 AMYLENETETRARARBOXYLATE 66 4.4 AMYLMERCAPTAN 68 4.7 ANILINE 32 7.8 ANILINE 68 7.3 ANILINE 212 5.5 ANILINE FORMALDEHYDE RESIN 3.5 - 3.6 ANILINE RESIN 3.4-3.8 ANISALDEHYDE 68 15.8 ANISALDOXINE 145 9.2 ANISOLE 68 4.3 ANITMONY TRICHLORIDE 5.3 ANTIMONY PENTACHLORIDE 68 3.2 ANTIMONY TRIBROMIDE 212 20.9 ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE 166 33 ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE 5.3 ANTIMONY TRICODIDE 347 13.9 APATITE 7.4 2 Dielectric Constants of Common Materials DIELECTRIC MATERIALS DEG.
    [Show full text]