DOCSLIB.ORG

Congress at a Climate Crossroads: Legislative Pathways for Decarbonization in the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congress at a Climate Crossroads: Legislative Pathways for Decarbonization in the United States Congress at a Climate Crossroads: Legislative Pathways for Decarbonization in the United States Honorable Mention, 2021 Dunlop Undergraduate Thesis Prize Myer Jei Johnson-Potter June 2021 M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series | No. 170 The views expressed in the M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series have not undergone formal review and approval; they are presented to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government Weil Hall | Harvard Kennedy School | www.hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg Congress at a Climate Crossroads: Legislative Pathways for Decarbonization in the United States A thesis presented by Myer Jei Johnson-Potter to The Committee on Degrees in Environmental Science and Public Policy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree with honors of Bachelor of Arts Harvard College Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2021 Johnson-Potter 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 4 The American Climate Policy Pendulum ................................................................................................................... 4 Thesis Roadmap ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Methodology and Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Thesis Scope and Key Policy Proposals Being Analyzed .................................................................................. 12 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2: Contemporary Economy-Wide Carbon Pricing Proposals in the United States .............................. 16 Chapter 2 Introduction and Overview ..................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2 Roadmap ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Part I: The Climate Leadership Council Carbon Dividends Plan .......................................................................... 20 Part II: How Would a Carbon Dividend Work (The Baker-Shultz Example) ......................................................... 21 Carbon Fee .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Carbon Price Accelerator and Emissions Assurance Mechanism (EAM) .......................................................... 22 Revenue Neutral Carbon Dividend ..................................................................................................................... 22 Regulatory Relief and Impact on Existing Regulations ...................................................................................... 23 Border Carbon Adjustment ................................................................................................................................. 24 Part III: Impact on Climate Crisis Mitigation and Technology Adoption .............................................................. 25 CLC Emissions Projections ................................................................................................................................ 25 CLC Technological Additionality Projections: .................................................................................................. 26 What is Left Out of the CLC Proposal ................................................................................................................ 28 Independent Emissions Projections for a Carbon Fee ........................................................................................ 31 Estimates of the Additionality of Low-Carbon Technologies Resulting from a Carbon Fee ............................. 34 Part IV: Economic Impact of Carbon Dividends .................................................................................................... 36 CLC Estimates of the Economic Impact of a Carbon Fee and Dividend ........................................................... 36 Empirical Evidence of a Carbon Fee’s Impact on Economic Growth (GDP) .................................................... 37 Models of the GDP Impacts of a Federal Carbon Fee ........................................................................................ 37 CLC Estimates of a Carbon Dividend’s Impact on Unemployment ................................................................... 38 Independent Estimates of the Impact of a Carbon Fee on Unemployment ........................................................ 39 CLC Estimates of the Distributional Impacts of a Carbon Fee and Dividend .................................................... 41 Independent Estimates of the Distributional Impacts of a Carbon Tax and Dividend ....................................... 42 Part V: Alternative Carbon Pricing Options from the 116th Congress ................................................................... 44 Differences in Starting Carbon Prices ................................................................................................................. 45 Differences in Carbon Price Accelerators ........................................................................................................... 45 Differences in Emissions Targets ....................................................................................................................... 46 Differences in Revenue Use ................................................................................................................................ 47 Differences in Proposed Regulatory Relief ........................................................................................................ 49 Part VI: Political Feasibility: Can an Economy-Wide Carbon Price Get Passed into Law? ................................. 49 Public Support for Carbon Pricing and the Carbon Dividends Plan ................................................................... 53 The Republicans: Support and Opposition: ........................................................................................................ 54 The Democrats: Support and Opposition ............................................................................................................ 57 Regulatory Relief as a Political Bargaining Chip for Carbon Pricing?: ............................................................. 59 Budget Reconciliation ......................................................................................................................................... 61 Part VII: Chapter Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 64 Johnson-Potter 2 Chapter 3: Federal Emissions Reduction Policies for the Power Sector ............................................................... 66 Chapter 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 66 Part I: Clean Energy/Electricity Standards ............................................................................................................ 67 What is a Clean Energy/Electricity Standard (CES)? ......................................................................................... 67 Part II: Tradable Performance Standards (TPS) .................................................................................................... 69 What is a Tradable Performance Standard (TPS) ............................................................................................... 69 Part III: Analysis of CES and TPS Policies ............................................................................................................. 70 Emissions and Technological Impacts of a CES/TPS Policy ............................................................................. 70 Economic and Distributional Impacts of CES/TPS ............................................................................................ 73 Part IV: Current and Recent CES/TPS Proposals .................................................................................................. 76 The 116th Congress ............................................................................................................................................. 76 The Evergreen Action Proposal .......................................................................................................................... 77 The CLEAN Future Act .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Governor's Race Gives Bernie Sanders
    This Governor’s Race Gives Bernie Sanders’ Movement One Mor... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/andru-volinsky-dan-feltes-bernie-... ! This Governor’s Race Gives Bernie Sanders’ Mov…Log In&& "Join #Hu!Post$ Plus% POLITICS 09/06/2020 09:10 am ET | Updated 13 hours ago This Governor’s Race Gives Bernie Sanders’ Movement One More Shot At A Big Win Andru Volinsky touts his experience as a climate change and education activist, but state Sen. Dan Feltes believes his battles with the Republican governor make him a better candidate. By Daniel Marans 1 of 8 9/6/20, 11:12 PM This Governor’s Race Gives Bernie Sanders’ Movement One Mor... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/andru-volinsky-dan-feltes-bernie-... ! This Governor’s Race Gives Bernie Sanders’ Mov…Log In&& "Join #Hu!Post$ Plus% VOLINSKY AND FELTES CAMPAIGNS/FACEBOOK Andru Volinsky (left), an attorney and education activist, is running to the left of state Senate Majority Leader Dan Feltes (right), in New Hampshire’s Democratic gubernatorial primary. In an election cycle filled with competitive Democratic congressional primaries, intraparty gubernatorial races have received less attention. But New Hampshire’s Democratic primary for governor on Tuesday is one of the last chances this year for an activist in the mold of independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of neighboring Vermont to nab a win. Sanders has endorsed Andru Volinsky, an attorney, environmentalist and education activist, in his race against Dan Feltes, New Hampshire’s state Senate majority leader, for the party’s gubernatorial nomination. The winner of Tuesday’s contest will go on to face Republican Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-4-2020 Draft Meeting Minutes Copy
    TOWN OF EXETER SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE DRAFT MEETING MINUTES February 4, 2020 Meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm by Chetana Parmar. Members Present: Christopher Zigmont, Nina Braun, Chetana Parmar, Kristen Osterwood, Robin Tyner, Beverly Tappan and Niko Papakonstantis, Select Board Representative (Dave Sharples, Town Representative unable to attend) Philips Exeter Academy Student Representative: Liuxi Sun January Meeting Minutes: Public Comments Sam and Maggie from Philips Exeter that are in a class Human Population and Resource Consumption - have a course where they have a project to do and would like to do something with/for the Sustainability Committee - politically related would be great. Robin and Nina will follow up with ideas for them. Bob Kelly owns Seacoast farms compost product: has been primary supplier of compost blends for the seacoast for decades. Have been located in Fremont for most of those years. Landlord wanted to redevelop property so Bob is working with the town to operate out of the transfer station. Also be able to provide a distribution network - currently the town accepts leaves but does not necessarily create a high quality compost product. He plans to provide a yard of material for free for everyone who has a dump sticker. Also to save town money on operation of the town transfer station. Use a different a gate - off of Kingston Rd, to not increase traffic. - two people and two pieces of equipment (screener and front end loader) - Public private partnership with a memorandum of understanding - May require dump sticker to be able to drop off and pick up - To start soon, hopefully by March Sustainability Fair - Luixi Presented the goals and ideas of how to achieve those goals (attached to the end of the minutes) - Settle on a location and theme for submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Information Commons a New Public Intere S T Agenda in Digital Media
    Saving the Information Commons A New Public Intere s t Agenda in Digital Media By David Bollier and Tim Watts NEW AMERICA FOUNDA T I O N PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE Saving the Information Commons A Public Intere s t Agenda in Digital Media By David Bollier and Tim Watts Washington, DC Ack n owl e d g m e n t s This report required the support and collaboration of many people. It is our pleasure to acknowledge their generous advice, encouragement, financial support and friendship. Recognizing the value of the “information commons” as a new paradigm in public policy, the Ford Foundation generously supported New America Foundation’s Public Assets Program, which was the incubator for this report. We are grateful to Gigi Sohn for helping us develop this new line of analysis and advocacy. We also wish to thank The Open Society Institute for its important support of this work at the New America Foundation, and the Center for the Public Domain for its valuable role in helping Public Knowledge in this area. Within the New America Foundation, Michael Calabrese was an attentive, helpful colleague, pointing us to useful literature and knowledgeable experts. A special thanks to him for improv- ing the rigor of this report. We are also grateful to Steve Clemons and Ted Halstead of the New America Foundation for their role in launching the Information Commons Project. Our research and writing of this report owes a great deal to a network of friends and allies in diverse realms. For their expert advice, we would like to thank Yochai Benkler, Jeff Chester, Rob Courtney, Henry Geller, Lawrence Grossman, Reed Hundt, Benn Kobb, David Lange, Jessica Litman, Eben Moglen, John Morris, Laurie Racine and Carrie Russell.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE Take Meaningful Climate Change Action
    CLIMATE CHANGE Take meaningful climate change action. Climate Change DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A CLIMATE ACTION PLAN Point of Contact: Andy Bertelsen / Nicole Antonopoulos Woodman Regional Plan Goal E&C.1. Proactively improve and maintain the region's air quality Goal E&C.2. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Goal E&C.3. Strengthen community and natural environmental resiliency through climate adaptation efforts. Goal E&C.4. Integrate available science into policies governing the use and conservation of Flagstaff's natural resources. Goal T.3 Provide transportation infrastructure that is conducive to conservation, preservation, and development goals to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts on the natural and build environment Goal E.1. Increase energy efficiency Goal E.2. Expand production and use of renewable energy POLICY IMPLICATION Healthy forests, prepared for and resilient to change from environmental factors, including Climate Change, is fostered by: Application of the City's Forest Stewardship Plan and the Greater Flagstaff Community Wildfire Protection Plan (adopted by Council in 2005), Implementation of on-going forest treatment efforts and the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Plan (passed by voters in 2012), and Support of multi-party collaborative efforts (ex: Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership [GFFP] and Four Forest Restoration Initiative [4FRI]) and the National Wildfire Cohesive Strategy Ongoing support for initiatives identified in the climate action plan. Fiscal implications will be identified during the FY 19 budget
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools Winners 2020 Microplastic Madness
    The Zero Waste Schools newsletter will help you get your school on a path toward generating zero waste through waste prevention, recycling, composting, and food recovery. You’ll also find resources that connect zero waste to healthy eating, school gardens, and environmental education and action. Feel free to share the newsletter with friends, colleagues, and students who are interested in zero waste. Sign up for ZWS news U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools Winners 2020 The U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools winners for 2020 were announced in early May. Green Ribbon Schools awards schools, districts and postsecondary institutions that: reduce environmental impact and costs improve the health and wellness of schools, students, and staff provide effective environmental and sustainability education. To apply, schools in Illinois first submit applications to the Illinois Green Ribbon Program. Applications are reviewed at the state level, and the top scoring schools are then submitted for consideration at the national level. 2020 honorees from Illinois: Joseph Sears School - Kenilworth, IL College of Lake County - Grayslake, IL Click on the links above to read each school's application, learn what they've accomplished, and get inspiration for your own school or district. 2020 honorees from across the U.S. can be seen HERE. See current and past honorees from Illinois and read more about the Illinois Green Ribbon program HERE. Be on the look out this September for the 2021 application on theI llinois Green Ribbon Program website. Microplastic Madness Microplastic Madness "is the story of 56 fifth graders from P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Theda Skocpol
    NAMING THE PROBLEM What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming Theda Skocpol Harvard University January 2013 Prepared for the Symposium on THE POLITICS OF AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING Co-sponsored by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Scholars Strategy Network February 14, 2013, 4-6 pm Tsai Auditorium, Harvard University CONTENTS Making Sense of the Cap and Trade Failure Beyond Easy Answers Did the Economic Downturn Do It? Did Obama Fail to Lead? An Anatomy of Two Reform Campaigns A Regulated Market Approach to Health Reform Harnessing Market Forces to Mitigate Global Warming New Investments in Coalition-Building and Political Capabilities HCAN on the Left Edge of the Possible Climate Reformers Invest in Insider Bargains and Media Ads Outflanked by Extremists The Roots of GOP Opposition Climate Change Denial The Pivotal Battle for Public Opinion in 2006 and 2007 The Tea Party Seals the Deal ii What Can Be Learned? Environmentalists Diagnose the Causes of Death Where Should Philanthropic Money Go? The Politics Next Time Yearning for an Easy Way New Kinds of Insider Deals? Are Market Forces Enough? What Kind of Politics? Using Policy Goals to Build a Broader Coalition The Challenge Named iii “I can’t work on a problem if I cannot name it.” The complaint was registered gently, almost as a musing after-thought at the end of a June 2012 interview I conducted by telephone with one of the nation’s prominent environmental leaders. My interlocutor had played a major role in efforts to get Congress to pass “cap and trade” legislation during 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • DECLARACIÓN JURADA De Julian Paul Assange
    DECLARACIÓN JURADA de Julian Paul Assange Yo, Julian Paul Assange, ciudadano de Australia, editor, y refugiado político bajo la protección de la Embajada de Ecuador en Londres, HAGO CONSTAR Q!E" So# el Editor de $ikiLeaks # un director de or&ani'aciones asociadas en un número de pa)ses inclu#endo Australia e Islandia+ Hago esta declaración jurada en relación al monitoreo de mis actividades periodísticas por la inteli&encia militar de EE+!!+ en Alemania entre el -. de diciembre del -//0 # el 1/ de diciembre del 2009 el cual fue utili'ado para asistir en el enjuiciamiento de una presunta fuente de $i%iLeaks, el oficial de inteli&encia militar de EE+!!+ Bradle# 5anning, 6uien fue sentenciado a 17 años en prisión militar el -9 de agosto del -/91: # en relación a la probable incautación ile&al de propiedad perteneciente al declarante # a $ikiLeaks mientras se encontraba bajo el control de las autoridades aeroportuarias de Arlanda (Estocolmo) o Te&el (Berl)n) el -= de septiembre del 2010, inter alia tres ordenadores port>tiles cifrados conteniendo materiales period)sticos # le&ales incluyendo evidencia de un crimen de guerra: # esta declaración jurada establece hechos 6ue conforman la base de mi entender 6ue la propiedad antes mencionada fue sujeta a un registro e incautación ile&al # 6ue el monitoreo de mis acti,idades en Alemania tambi@n fue ile&al+ 5e asesoran mis abogados 6ue, adem>s de los derechos 6ue gozan los individuos, como editor # periodista, mi trabajo se encuentra protegido por los derechos # libertades correspondientes, los cuales son vinculantes para Suecia y Alemania+ Escribo esta declaración jurada para ejercer mi derecho a una solución jur)dica e2ecti,a+ Hago esta declaración jurada según mi leal saber y entender+ Índice • 1 Resumen de reclamos • 2 Estado actual • 3 Operaciones de inteli&encia conocidas antes de viajar a Suecia • 4 Estancia eBtendida en Suecia • 5 Presunta confiscación de maleta, EstocolmoDBerl)n • 6 Esfuerzos por recuperar la maleta y presentar una denuncia ante la polic)a • 7 Esfuerzos ininterrumpidos de EE+!!.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paris Accord and Climate Change the President Has
    The Paris Accord and Climate Change The President has announced that he will withdraw the United States from the Paris Accord, which entered into force November 4, 2016. According to Article 28 of the Accord, the U.S. must wait three years from the November 4, 2016 date to make written notification that it will withdraw from the Accord. The United States then must wait at least an additional year from the date of this written notification to leave the Accord. Hence, given these conditions written into the Accord, U.S. voters awaiting the 2020 presidential election will have the opportunity to decide as a major political issue what actions the United States should take about the Paris Accord and climate change. The President’s announcement of his intention to withdraw from the Paris Accord generated substantial criticism from G-20 national leaders during their last meeting July 7-8 2017 in Hamburg, Germany. Those leaders, other than the US President, have indicated unanimous support for implementing the Paris Accord. The leaders of the European Union and China state they will move ahead with plans to implement the Accord, whether or not the United States remains a signatory. The Paris Accord states as one of its objectives “holding the increase in the global temperature to well below 2 degrees C above the pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C above pre- industrial levels”. This wording was negotiated in recognition that the Earth (and its present and future populations) will undergo profound and insupportable warming, further acidification of the oceans, and significant sea level rise threatening the world’s coastal communities unless the world’s greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sunrise Movement's Hybrid Organizing
    The Sunrise Movement’s Hybrid Organizing: The elements of a massive decentralized and sustained social movement Sarah Lasoff Urban and Environmental Policy Department Occidental College May 11th, 2020 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Matsuoka and the Urban and Environmental Policy department for giving me a place to study this movement. I would like to thank Professor Peter Dreier, Professor Marisol León, Professor Philip Ayoub for teaching me about organizing and social movements. I would like to thank Melissa Mateo and Kayla Williams for sharing your wisdom, your leadership, and passion for change with me. I would like to thank Sunrise organizers, Sara Blazevic, William Lawrence, Danielle Reynolds, Monica Guzman, and Ina Morton for sharing their wisdom and stories with me. I would like to thank the entire Sunrise Movement for already bringing so much change, but more importantly, for it’s current fight for a better future. And finally, I would like to thank my mom, Karen, for being the first person to tell me I can make a difference and my sister, Sophie, for being the person to show me how. 1 Abstract My senior comprehensive project focuses on the Sunrise Movement’s organizing strategies in order to determine how to build massive decentralized social movements. My research question asks, “How does the Sunrise Movement incorporate both structure-based and mass protest strategies in their organizing to build a massive decentralized social movement?” What I found: Sunrise is, theoretically, a mass protest movement that integrates elements of structure based organizing, a hybrid of the two. Sunrise builds a base of active popular support or “people power” and electoral power through the cycles of momentum, moral protest, distributed organizing, local organizing, training, and national organizing with the hopes of using that power in order to engage in mass noncooperation and manifest a new political alignment or “people’s alignment” in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech
    Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech David Supp-Montgomerie A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication Studies in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Christian Lundberg V. William Balthrop Carole Blair Lawrence Grossberg William Keith © 2013 David Supp-Montgomerie ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT David Supp-Montgomerie: Speaking from the Heart: Mediation and Sincerity in U.S. Political Speech (Under the direction of Christian Lundberg) This dissertation is a critique of the idea that the artifice of public speech is a problem to be solved. This idea is shown to entail the privilege attributed to purportedly direct or unmediated speech in U.S. public culture. I propose that we attend to the ēthos producing effects of rhetorical concealment by asserting that all public speech is constituted through rhetorical artifice. Wherever an alternative to rhetoric is offered, one finds a rhetoric of non-rhetoric at work. A primary strategy in such rhetoric is the performance of sincerity. In this dissertation, I analyze the function of sincerity in contexts of public deliberation. I seek to show how claims to sincerity are strategic, demonstrate how claims that a speaker employs artifice have been employed to imply a lack of sincerity, and disabuse communication, rhetoric, and deliberative theory of the notion that sincere expression occurs without technology. In Chapter Two I begin with the original problem of artifice for rhetoric in classical Athens in the writings of Plato and Isocrates.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Change U.S. Climate Policy After There Is a Price on Carbon
    POLICY PROPOSAL 2019-15 | OCTOBER 2019 How to Change U.S. Climate Policy after There Is a Price on Carbon Roberton C. Williams III The Hamilton Project • Brookings i MISSION STATEMENT The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. We believe that today’s increasingly competitive global economy demands public policy ideas commensurate with the challenges of the 21st Century. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by fostering economic growth and broad participation in that growth, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy calls for combining public investment, a secure social safety net, and fiscal discipline. In that framework, the Project puts forward innovative proposals from leading economic thinkers — based on credible evidence and experience, not ideology or doctrine — to introduce new and effective policy options into the national debate. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first Treasury Secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. The guiding principles of the Project remain consistent with these views. ii How to Change U.S. Climate Policy after There Is a Price on Carbon How to Change U.S. Climate Policy after There Is a Price on Carbon Roberton C.
    [Show full text]