DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproductive Biology in Quadrivisio Lutzi Medeiros And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reproductive Biology in Quadrivisio Lutzi Medeiros And Medeiros and Weber Reproductive biology in Quadrivisio lutzi Supplementary Material. Amphipod data used for comparisons and for PCA analysis. For those species with more than one information, the mean value across populations was used for PCA. PCA was only possible for those species with all three reproductive parameters available (HMFBLr, BS/BL and EggD-%FS). Female 1st size Brood Egg Species Name (Abbr) Family Habitat HMFBLr BS/BL EggD-%FS Source BodyLength maturity Size Size Ampelisca abdita (Aab) Ampeliscidae MW 6.6 26.0 0.166 3.9 0.43 6.5 Mills (1967)a Ampelisca araucana (Aar) Ampeliscidae MW 4.8 4.7 0.312 1.0 0.45 9.4 Carrasco and Arcos (1984)a Ampelisca vadorum (Ava) Ampeliscidae MW 6.0 9.1 0.250 1.5 0.51 8.5 Van Dolah and Bird (1980)a Gitanopsis squamosa (Gsq) Amphilochidae MW 3.6 5.9 0.194 1.6 0.40 11.1 Thurston (1974)a Ampithoe laxipodus (Ala) Ampithoidae MW 5.7 4.2 8.0 0.122 0.9 Appadoo and Myers (2004) Ampithoe longimana (Alo) Ampithoidae MW 5.8 2.4 9.4 1.6 0.42 7.2 Nelson (1978)b Ampithoe ramondi (Ara) Ampithoidae MW 8.0 21.0 0.375 2.6 0.31 3.9 Gilat (1962)a Cymadusa compta (Cco) Ampithoidae MW 5.8 3.5 13.5 1.6 0.41 7.1 Nelson (1978)b Grandidierella bonnieroides (Gbo) Aoridae MW 5.4 28.9 0.389 5.3 Thömke (1979)a Lembos websteri (Lwe) Aoridae MW 4.7 2.5 8.0 1.7 0.43 9.1 Nelson (1978)b Leptocheirus pilosus (Lpil) Aoridae BW 3.5 11.0 0.143 3.1 Goodhart (1939)a Microdeutopus gryllotalpa (Mgr) Aoridae MW 6.3 21.0 0.270 3.3 Myers (1971)a Atylus guttatus (Agu) Atylidae MW 5.5 26.0 0.273 4.7 0.40 7.3 Ivanov (1961)a Amphiporeia virginiana (Avi) Bathyporeiidae MW 5.5 6.0 0.273 1.1 0.27 4.9 Van Dolah and Bird (1980)a Bathyporeia elegans (Bel) Bathyporeiidae MW 3.5 3.5 0.286 1.0 Fincham (1971)a MW 5.6 7.5 0.125 1.3 Salvat (1967)a Bathyporeia pelagica (Bpe) Bathyporeiidae MW 5.1 6.4 1.3 0.42 8.2 Fish (1975)a MW 5.1 5.0 0.176 1.0 Salvat (1967)a Bathyporeia pilosa (Bpi) Bathyporeiidae MW 4.4 6.9 1.6 0.44 10.0 Fish (1975)a Bathyporeia sarsi (Bsa) Bathyporeiidae MW 5.5 9.0 0.164 1.6 Salvat (1967)a Calliopius laeviusculus (Cla) Calliopiidae MW 8.0 48.5 0.500 6.1 0.45 5.6 Steele and Steele (1973)a Metaleptamphopus pectinatus (Mpe) Calliopiidae MW 6.0 9.3 0.083 1.6 0.43 7.2 Thurston (1974)a Stenopleura atlantica (Sat) Calliopiidae MW 5.8 7.0 0.293 1.2 Schellenberg (1926)a Chelura terebrans (Cte) Cheluridae MW 4.0 3.7 0.500 0.9 0.45 11.3 Kühne and Becker (1964)a Austrochiltonia australis (Aau) Chiltoniidae FW 6.0 46.5 0.317 7.8 Smith and Williams (1983)a Austrochiltonia subtenuis (Asu) Chiltoniidae BW 4.0 22.1 0.500 5.5 Lim and Williams (1971)a Corophium insidiosum (Cin) Corophiidae MW 3.8 10.8 0.474 2.8 0.36 9.5 Nair and Anger (1979a)a FW 7.8 33.3 0.282 4.3 Hynes (1955)a Crangonyx gracilis (Cgr) Crangonyctidae FW 7.3 5.0 33.3 3.2 Hynes (1955)b Crangonyx rivularis (Criv) Crangonyctidae FW 6.0 19.3 0.167 3.2 Judd (1963)a Exoediceros fossor (Efo) Exoedicerotidae MW 5.7 9.6 0.456 1.7 Dexter (1985)a Exoediceroides maculosus(Ema) Exoedicerotidae MW 5.1 9.4 0.294 1.8 Dexter (1985)a Gammarus chevreuxi (Gch) Gammaridae BW 7.0 30.0 0.286 4.3 Sexton (1928)a MW 7.5 5.3 25.0 3.3 0.45 6.0 Steele and Steele (1970)b Gammarus lawrencianus (Gla) Gammaridae MW 7.0 19.2 0.286 2.7 0.41 5.9 Steele and Steele (1970)a MW 7.0 21.8 0.429 3.1 0.41 5.9 Steele and Steele (1970)a MW 5.3 10.3 0.521 1.9 0.36 6.7 Steele and Steele (1975b)c MW 6.0 14.0 0.333 2.3 0.36 6.0 Steele and Steele (1975a)a Gammarus mucronatus (Gmu) Gammaridae BW 5.5 16.8 0.364 3.1 0.43 7.8 LaFrance and Ruber (1985)a MW 5.8 21.4 0.207 3.9 0.28 4.8 Van Dolah and Bird (1980)a BW 8.0 35.7 0.438 4.5 0.43 5.4 LaFrance and Ruber (1985)a Mucrogammarus mucronatus (Mmu) Gammaridae MW 5.5 3.5 12,0 2.2 0.48 8.7 Steele and Steele (1975a)b Gammarus obtusatus (Gob) Gammaridae MW 8.0 16.1 0.875 2.1 0.65 8.1 Steele and Steele (1975a)c Gammarus olivii (Gol) Gammaridae MW 6.5 23.0 0.538 3.5 Greze (1972)a MW 6.5 9.2 0.385 1.4 0.41 6.3 Van Dolah et al. (1975)a Gammarus palustris (Gpa) Gammaridae BW 7.2 30.5 0.514 4.2 Gable and Croker (1977)a BW 7.5 12.0 0.147 1.6 Borowsky (1980)a BW 6.0 12.0 0.167 2.0 0,44 7.3 Steele and Steele (1975a)a Gammarus stoerensis (Gst) Gammaridae BW 6.7 26.9 0.134 4.0 Skadsheim (1982)a Chaetogammarus stoerensis (Cst) Gammaridae FW 6.0 6.0 13.0 2.2 0.49 8.2 Steele and Steele (1972)b Gammarus tigrinus (Gti) Gammaridae FW 6.5 28.7 0.785 4.4 Chambers (1977)a Eohaustorius brevicuspus (Ebr) Haustoriidae MW 3.9 6.9 0.282 1.8 Bosworth (1976)a Eohaustorius estuarius (Ees) Haustoriidae BW 3.7 6.5 0.351 1.8 Bosworth (1976)a Eohaustorius washingtonius (Ewa) Haustoriidae MW 4.6 11.9 0.304 2.6 Bosworth (1976)a Nauplius, 24: e2016003 1 Diagramação e XML SciELO Publishing Schema: www.editoraletra1.com Medeiros and Weber Reproductive biology in Quadrivisio lutzi Supplementary Material. Cont. Female 1st size Brood Egg Species Name (Abbr) Family Habitat HMFBLr BS/BL EggD-%FS Source BodyLength maturity Size Size Haustorius canadenses (Hca) Haustoriidae MW 6.8 7.9 0.353 1.2 Donn and Croker (1986)a Haustorius dytiscus (Hdy) Haustoriidae MW 4.0 4.0 0.175 1.0 Croker (1967)a Neohaustorius biarticulatus (Nbi) Haustoriidae MW 5.0 7.0 0.300 1.4 Sameoto (1969a)a Neohaustorius schmitzi (Nsc) Haustoriidae MW 4.5 4.8 0.333 1.1 0.45 10.0 Van Dolah and Bird (1980)a Parahaustorius longimerus (Plo) Haustoriidae MW 6.3 7.8 0.190 1.2 Croker (1967)a Protohaustorius deichmannae (Pde) Haustoriidae MW 4.7 5.7 0.319 1.2 Sameoto (1969b)a Sameoto (1969b)a; Acanthohaustorius millsi (Ami) Haustoriidae MW 3.8 4.8 0.211 1.3 0.78 20.5 Van Dolah and Bird (1980)a FW 6.7 4.8 17.0 2.5 0.38 5.7 Strong Jr.(1972)b Hyallela azteca (Haz) Hyallelidae FW 5.9 4.9 18.0 3.0 0.32 5.4 Strong Jr.(1972)b FW 4.3 3.3 8.0 1.9 0.30 7.0 Strong Jr.(1972)b Parhyalella basrensis (Pba) Hyalellidae BW 6.3 15.3 0.349 2.4 0.39 6.2 Ali and Salman (1986)a Hyalella knickerbockeri (Hkn) Hyalellidae FW 5.5 17.6 0.345 3.2 Embody (1911)a MW 5.5 8.0 1.5 0.44 8.0 Steele (1973)b Parhyallela pietschmani (Ppi) Hyallelidae MW 6.5 12.9 0.385 2.0 0.39 6.0 Steele (1973)a Hyale barbicornis (Hba) Hyalidae MW 7.5 13.5 0.533 1.8 Hiwatari and Kajihara (1984)a MW 7.5 23.8 0.090 3.2 McBane and Croker (1984)a Hyale nilsoni (Hni) Hyalidae BW 6.2 20.7 3.3 McBane and Croker (1984)a Hyale prevosti (Hpr) Hyalidae MW 6.9 160 0.304 2.3 Kuznetsov (1964)a Hyale schmidti (Hsc) Hyalidae MW 4.0 5.7 0.250 1.4 Gilat (1962)a MW 6.8 75.0 0.324 11.0 Kuznetsov (1964)a Ischyrocerus anguipes (Ian) Ischyroceridae MW 4.9 34.5 0.265 7.0 Kuznetsov (1964)a Erichtonius brasiliensis (Ebr) Ischyroceridae MW 5.0 9.4 0.300 1.9 Hughes (1978)a MW 6.7 9.4 0.224 1.4 Nair and Anger (1979b)a Jasa falcata ( Jfa) Ischyroceridae MW 4.6 3.6 25.6 5.6 0.32 7.0 McGovern (Unpubl.)b Lafystius morhuanus (Lmo) Lafystiidae MW 5.7 7.3 0.193 1.3 Bousfield (1987)a Lepidepecreum cingulatum (Lci) Lysianassidae MW 6.6 10.8 0.061 1.6 0.44 6.7 Thurston (1974)a Hippomedon whero (Hwh) Lysianassidae MW 5.3 3.4 0.264 0.6 0.39 7.4 Fenwick (1985)a Metambasia faeroensis (Mfa) Lysianassidae MW 5.5 2.0 0.091 0.4 0.40 7.3 Stephensen (1923)a Orchomenella minuta (Omi) Lysianassidae MW 6.4 14.7 0.375 2.3 0.52 8.1 Sainte-Marie et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complete Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation of a Critically Important
    Environment International 137 (2020) 105319 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environment International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Complete transcriptome assembly and annotation of a critically important amphipod species in freshwater ecotoxicological risk assessment: Gammarus T fossarum ⁎ Domenico R. Caputoa,1, Samuel C. Robsonb,1, Inge Wernerc, Alex T. Forda, a Institute of Marine Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Ferry Road, Portsmouth PO4 9LY, UK b Centre for Enzyme Innovation, St. Michael's Building, University of Portsmouth, White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT, UK c Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology, Eawag - EPFL, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Hefa Cheng Because of their crucial role in ecotoxicological risk assessment, amphipods (Crustacea) are commonly employed Keywords: as model species in a wide range of studies. However, despite their ecological importance, their genome has not Gammarus fossarum yet been completely annotated and molecular mechanisms underlying key pathways, such as the serotonin RNA sequencing pathway, in development of ecotoxicological biomarkers of exposure to neuroactive pharmaceuticals are still De novo assembly poorly understood. Furthermore, genetic similarities and discrepancies with other model arthropods (e.g., Serotonin pathway Drosophila melanogaster) have not been completely clarified. In this report, we present a new transcriptome assembly of Gammarus fossarum, an important amphipod species, widespread in Central Europe. RNA-Seq with Illumina HiSeq technology was used to analyse samples extracted from total internal tissues. We used the Trinity and Trinotate software suites for transcriptome assembly and annotation, respectively. The quality of this as- sembly and the affiliated targeted homology searches greatly enrich the molecular knowledge on this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the Family Hyalidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Along the Northeast Atlantic Coasts
    ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA SCUOLA DI SCIENZE - CAMPUS DI RAVENNA CORSO DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE IN BIOLOGIA MARINA Phylogeny and phylogeography of the family Hyalidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) along the northeast Atlantic coasts Tesi di laurea in Alterazione e Conservazione degli Habitat Marini Relatore Presentata da Prof. Marco Abbiati Andrea Desiderato Correlatore Prof. Henrique Queiroga II sessione Anno accademico 2014/2015 “...Nothing at first can appear more difficult to believe than that the more complex organs and instincts should have been perfected, not by means superior to, though analogous with, human reason, but by the accumulation of innumerable slight variations, each good for the individual possessor…” (Darwin 1859) 1 1) Index 1) Index ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 2) Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 3) Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 a) Hyalidae Bulycheva, 1957 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 4 b) Phylogeny -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 i) Phylogeny of Hyalidae -------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 c) The DNA barcode --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 d) Apohyale prevostii (Milne Edwars, 1830) --------------------------------------------- 9
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Amphipod (Crustacea) Fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and Some Environmental Factors Affecting Their Distribution
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 56(2): 171 - 188, 2015 Benthic amphipod (Crustacea) fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and some environmental factors affecting their distribution Ayşegül MÜLAYİM*1, Hüsamettin BALKIS1 and Murat SEZGİN2 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 34134 Istanbul,Turkey 2Sinop University, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology 57000 Sinop, Turkey *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] This study aims to determine the environmental factors affecting the fauna and distribution of benthic amphipod species inhabiting in the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs which are located on the south of the Marmara Sea. Total of 66 species belonging to 22 families were identified after analyzing the samples collected seasonally from the depths ranging between 1 and 30 m between 2007- 2008. According to the data gathered from the literature, it was determined that one species (Bathyporeia elegans Watkin, 1938) was a new record for the Turkish seas and 37 species for the Marmara Sea. In the Bandırma Gulf, of the ecological variables of the environment temperature was determined to range between 6.6-27°C, salinity between 21.32-36.03 psu, dissolved oxygen between 4.04-11.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.00-8.38. In the Erdek Gulf, temperature ranged between 6.7 and 27°C, salinity between 21.93-35.54‰, dissolved oxygen between 3.67-13.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.06-8.36. In the surface sediment at the sampling stations of the Bandırma Gulf, total organic carbon values were between 0.07-4.42%, total calcium carbonate between 0.88-84.82%, total phosphorus between 609-12740 μg g-1 and mud percentage between 1.38-79.93%.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 10-2: Arthropods: Crustacea
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Arthropods: Crustacea – Ostracoda and Amphipoda. Chapt. 10-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 10-2-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 10-2 ARTHROPODS: CRUSTACEA – OSTRACODA AND AMPHPODA TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASS OSTRACODA ..................................................................................................................................... 10-2-2 Adaptations ................................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Swimming to Crawling ....................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Habitats ...................................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Terrestrial ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Peat Bogs ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-4 Aquatic ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to and Revisions of the Amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Fauna of South Africa, with a List of Currently Known Species from the Region
    Additions to and revisions of the amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) fauna of South Africa, with a list of currently known species from the region Rebecca Milne Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa & Charles L. Griffiths* Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (with 13 figures) Received 25 June 2013. Accepted 23 August 2013 Three species of marine Amphipoda, Peramphithoe africana, Varohios serratus and Ceradocus isimangaliso, are described as new to science and an additional 13 species are recorded from South Africa for the first time. Twelve of these new records originate from collecting expeditions to Sodwana Bay in northern KwaZulu-Natal, while one is an introduced species newly recorded from Simon’s Town Harbour. In addition, we collate all additions and revisions to the regional amphipod fauna that have taken place since the last major monographs of each group and produce a comprehensive, updated faunal list for the region. A total of 483 amphipod species are currently recognized from continental South Africa and its Exclusive Economic Zone . Of these, 35 are restricted to freshwater habitats, seven are terrestrial forms, and the remainder either marine or estuarine. The fauna includes 117 members of the suborder Corophiidea, 260 of the suborder Gammaridea, 105 of the suborder Hyperiidea and a single described representative of the suborder Ingolfiellidea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malacostracan Fauna of Two Arctic Fjords (West Spitsbergen): the Diversity And
    + Models OCEANO-95; No. of Pages 24 Oceanologia (2017) xxx, xxx—xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect j ournal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/oceanologia/ ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE The malacostracan fauna of two Arctic fjords (west Spitsbergen): the diversity and distribution patterns of its pelagic and benthic components Joanna Legeżyńska *, Maria Włodarska-Kowalczuk, Marta Gluchowska, Mateusz Ormańczyk, Monika Kędra, Jan Marcin Węsławski Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland Received 14 July 2016; accepted 6 January 2017 KEYWORDS Summary This study examines the performance of pelagic and benthic Malacostraca in two Malacostraca; glacial fjords of west Spitsbergen: Kongsfjorden, strongly influenced by warm Atlantic waters, Arctic; and Hornsund which, because of the strong impact of the cold Sørkapp Current, has more of Svalbard; an Arctic character. The material was collected during 12 summer expeditions organized from Diversity; 1997 to 2013. In all, 24 pelagic and 116 benthic taxa were recorded, most of them widely Distribution distributed Arctic-boreal species. The advection of different water masses from the shelf had a direct impact on the structure of the pelagic Malacostraca communities, resulting in the clear dominance of the sub-arctic hyperiid amphipod Themisto abyssorum in Kongsfjorden and the great abundance of Decapoda larvae in Hornsund. The taxonomic, functional and size compositions of the benthic malacostracan assemblages varied between the two fjords, and also between the glacier-proximate inner bays and the main fjord basins, as a result of the varying dominance patterns of the same assemblage of species. There was a significant drop in species richness in the strongly disturbed glacial bays of both fjords, but only in Hornsund was this accompanied by a significant decrease in density and diversity, probably due to greater isolation and poorer quality of sediment organic matter in its innermost basin.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Marine Benthic Metabarcoding
    University of Groningen Marine benthic metabarcoding Klunder, Lise Margriet DOI: 10.33612/diss.135301602 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Klunder, L. M. (2020). Marine benthic metabarcoding: Anthropogenic effects on benthic diversity from shore to deep sea; assessed by metabarcoding and traditional taxonomy. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.135301602 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-12-2020 CHAPTER 2 Diversity of Wadden Sea macrofauna and meiofauna communities highest in DNA from extractions preceded by cell lysis Lise Klunder Gerard C.A. Duineveld Marc S.S. Lavaleye Henk W. van der Veer Per J. Palsbøll Judith D.L. van Bleijswijk Manuscript published in Journal of Sea Research 152 (2019) Chapter 2 ABSTRACT Metabarcoding of genetic material in environmental samples has increasingly been employed as a means to assess biodiversity, also of marine benthic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme
    The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme Macrobenthic Exercise Results – MB19 Jessica Taylor & David Hall [email protected] June 2012 Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. 7 Diamond Centre Works Road Letchworth Hertfordshire SG6 1LW www.unicomarine.com EXERCISE DETAILS Macrobenthos #19 Type/Contents – Natural marine sample from southern North Sea; approx. 0.5 litres of shell debris; 1 mm sieve mesh processing. Circulated – 05/09/2011 Completion Date – 02/12/2011 Number of Participating Laboratories – 9 Number of Results Received – 7 ______________________________________________________________________________ Contents Results Sheets 1 - 7. NMBAQC Scheme Interim Results – Macrobenthic exercise (MB19). Tables Table 1. Results from the analysis of Macrobenthic sample MB19 by the participating laboratories. Table 2. Comparison of the efficiency of extraction of fauna by the participating laboratories for the major taxonomic groups present in sample MB19. Table 3. Comparison of the estimates of biomass made by the participating laboratories with those made by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. for the major taxonomic groups present in sample MB19. Table 5. Variation in faunal content reported for the artificial replicate samples distributed as MB19. Figures Figure 1. MB19 data from participating laboratories (raw - untransformed). Cluster dendrogram showing plotted data from participating laboratories as supplied. Figure 2. MB19 data reanalysed by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. Cluster dendrogram showing plotted data from participating laboratories following reanalysis by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. (untransformed). All residues and fauna have been reanalysed. No data truncation – all faunal groups included. Appendices Appendix 1 MB19 Instructions for participation. NMBAQC Scheme Interim Results LabCode LB1802 Summary Data SampleCode MB19 Diff. In No. Taxa -6 Sample Received 16/01/2012 Diff.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Trophic Ecology of Hydrothermal Vent Fauna Associated with Tubeworm Assemblages on the Juan De Fuca Ridge
    Biogeosciences, 15, 2629–2647, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Biodiversity and trophic ecology of hydrothermal vent fauna associated with tubeworm assemblages on the Juan de Fuca Ridge Yann Lelièvre1,2, Jozée Sarrazin1, Julien Marticorena1, Gauthier Schaal3, Thomas Day1, Pierre Legendre2, Stéphane Hourdez4,5, and Marjolaine Matabos1 1Ifremer, Centre de Bretagne, REM/EEP, Laboratoire Environnement Profond, 29280 Plouzané, France 2Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada 3Laboratoire des Sciences de l’Environnement Marin (LEMAR), UMR 6539 9 CNRS/UBO/IRD/Ifremer, BP 70, 29280, Plouzané, France 4Sorbonne Université, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France 5CNRS, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France Correspondence: Yann Lelièvre ([email protected]) Received: 3 October 2017 – Discussion started: 12 October 2017 Revised: 29 March 2018 – Accepted: 7 April 2018 – Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract. Hydrothermal vent sites along the Juan de Fuca community structuring. Vent food webs did not appear to be Ridge in the north-east Pacific host dense populations of organised through predator–prey relationships. For example, Ridgeia piscesae tubeworms that promote habitat hetero- although trophic structure complexity increased with ecolog- geneity and local diversity. A detailed description of the ical successional stages, showing a higher number of preda- biodiversity and community structure is needed to help un- tors in the last stages, the food web structure itself did not derstand the ecological processes that underlie the distribu- change across assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the Lower Chesapeake Estuaries
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1971 The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries James Feely Virginia Institute of Marine Science Marvin L. Wass Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Feely, J., & Wass, M. L. (1971) The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries. Special papers in marine science No.2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. http://doi.org/10.21220/V5H01D This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 VIRGIN IA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SC IE NCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1971 THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER 1 CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 1971 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 This document is in part a thesis by James B. Feeley presented to the School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary in Virginia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]