Distribution and Abundance of White Grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on Groundnut in Southern India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution and Abundance of White Grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on Groundnut in Southern India ARTICLE IN PRESS Crop Protection 25 (2006) 732–740 www.elsevier.com/locate/cropro Distribution and abundance of white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on groundnut in southern India V. Anithaa,1, D.J. Rogersb,Ã,2, J. Wightmanc, A. Wardd,3 aInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India 502324 bFarming Systems Institute, Indooroopilly Sciences Centre, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, 80 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly 4068, Australia cInternational Pest Management, Conondale Cottage, 931 Stanley River Rd. Maleny, Qld 4552, Australia dFarming Systems Institute, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 23, Kingaroy, Qld 4610, Australia Received 7 October 2004; received in revised form 6 December 2004; accepted 3 October 2005 Abstract Scarab species associated with groundnuts were surveyed in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, southern India, between 1995 and 2001. Scarab adults were collected from trees on which they were feeding and/or mating, and larvae (white grubs) from groundnut fields. Holotrichia species, especially H. reynaudi and H. serrata were the major species associated with groundnut. H. reynaudi predominated in the central Deccan area, while H. serrata was most abundant in the south and west. A new, undescribed, Holotrichia species near H. consanguinea was collected in south and southwest of Hyderabad in mixed populations with H. reynaudi. However, the full extent of this new species’ distribution remains uncertain. H. rufoflava was rarely associated with groundnut, but was common as an adult at some locations. Other genera encountered during surveys were Anomala, Adoretus, Schizonycha, and Autoserica. In survey data, densities of Holotrichia larvae and ‘all other white grubs’ were both very highly correlated with the percentage of damaged groundnut plants. These correlations in combination with concurrent observations of plant damage establish a causal link between white grubs and plant damage and death in southern Indian groundnut. Ranking of preferred host trees for adults were developed from field observations for four Holotrichia species and Schizonycha spp. and will assist grower-initiated surveys of pest occurrence. In combination with insecticide-efficacy data published elsewhere, the survey provides the basis for an environmentally friendly and economically viable pest- management system for white grubs on groundnut in southern India. r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Holotrichia serrata; Holotrichia reynaudi; Peanut; Anomala; Adoretus; Schizonycha; Autoserica 1. Introduction and Sharma (1995) and Musthak Ali (2001) indicate that of the many Melolonthine genera found under the crop in Wightman and Ranga Rao (1994) reviewed the Scar- India, the genus Holotrichia includes the most important abaeids causing damage to groundnut (peanut) in the pest species in groundnut. In northern regions (Gujarat, world, listing a total of 22 species from 9 genera associated Rajasthan, Punjab, and Bihar), H. consanguinea is the with groundnut in India. More recent overviews by Yadava predominant species. At the time of the Wightman and Ranga Rao (1994) review, the predominant species known to be associated with groundnut in southern India was ÃCorresponding author. Research Connections and Consulting, PO Box 350, Toowong, Qld. 4066, Australia. Tel./fax: +61 7 3720 9065. H. serrata. Yadava and Sharma (1995) and Musthak Ali E-mail address: [email protected] (D.J. Rogers). (2001) record H. serrata as a serious pest in many parts of 1Present address: Fruit Research Station, Acharya NG Ranga western and peninsular India, including Gujarat, Mahar- Agricultural University, Sanga Reddy, Medak, Andhra Pradesh, 502001, ashtra, and parts of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Andhra India. Pradesh. H. reynaudi has been recognised as a significant 2Present address: Research Connections and Consulting, PO Box 350, Toowong, Qld. 4066, Australia. pest species only since the Wightman and Ranga Rao 3Present address: BeckerUnderwood Australia, RMB 1084, Pacific (1994) review, and is now known to be the major species in Highway, Somersby, NSW 2250, Australia. the central peninsular areas of India (Karnataka, Andhra 0261-2194/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2005.10.001 ARTICLE IN PRESS V. Anitha et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 732–740 733 Pradesh and Tamil Nadu) (Anitha, 1997). Little was central peninsular India based on accurate pest identification, known of its biology or distribution prior to Anitha (1997). understanding of the pests’ damage potential on groundnut, Adults of Indian Holotrichia species become active with and minimum-dose intervention with insecticides. the arrival of the monsoon or heavy pre-monsoon showers; if the monsoon is late, the beetles’ emergence is accordingly 2. Materials and methods delayed (Yadava and Sharma, 1995). As the monsoon’s arrival initiates groundnut planting, there is a close 2.1. Adult surveys association between crop and pest phenologies. Once active, adults fly to trees at dusk for mating and feeding 2.1.1. 1995 and 1996 for a few days after the arrival of the monsoon before Adult surveys to determine species occurrence and returning to the soil each day. What constitutes a host for relative abundance were conducted in the five important adults of these species is somewhat problematic because groundnut-growing areas in Andhra Pradesh during the mating and feeding can, but do not have to, occur on the rainy seasons of 1995 and 1996. In 1995, beetles were same tree species. Mating can occur on trees not normally collected at locations near Anantapur, Tirupathi, Kurnool, fed on, with beetles subsequently moving to preferred Patancheru (ICRISAT research farm), and Mahbubnagar, species to feed (Yadava and Sharma, 1995). Females from areas known to be endemic to groundnut white grubs. subsequently lay eggs in the soil. Larvae develop rapidly, In 1996, collections were repeated at the first four reaching full size in 67 days for H. reynaudi (Anitha, 1997), locations. After suitable rainfall events, representative and 82–113 days for H. consanguinea (Yadava and Sharma samples of beetles were collected during May–August and 1995). October from trees, including neem, wild ber (Zizyphus Preferences of adult Holotrichia for mating and feeding spp.), acacia (Acacia arabica), and drumstick located on trees are known for some species in other parts of India. roadsides of the predominantly groundnut-growing region, For H. consanguinea in northern India, adult host trees or in the groundnut fields. In these areas, trees 3–5 m high include ber (Zizyphus spp.), neem, (Azadirachta indica) and are commonly found on roadsides and at the margins of drumstick (Moringa oleifera)(Yadava and Sharma, 1995) groundnut fields, as well as scattered trees through the with a 1:1 sex ratio for adults on trees (Leal et al., 1996). fields at densities of approximately 3–5 per hectare. They H. serrata occurs most commonly on neem, Butea provide shade and fodder for animals, and firewood, and monosperma and Acacia spp. (Yadava and Sharma, so are actively retained within the cropping system. 1995). Host-tree preferences of Holotrichia species in Because beetles rest in the soil during the day, and so are central peninsular India are much less known, in part not readily available for collection, they were hand-picked because the tree fauna differs, and in part because of a lack and/or shaken from the host trees during their night of knowledge of the biology of the Holotrichia species that activity period (between 1900 and 2300 h) and preserved in occur there. 70% ethyl alcohol for later identification. During the On a global scale, southern India is a major groundnut evening adult-sampling program, sites were selected along producing region, with the states of Andhra Pradesh, roads by stopping at milepost markers and searching trees Karnataka and Tamil Nadu producing more than 5 million with 20–30 m of the marker. Trees in adjacent groundnut tonnes of nuts from almost 5 million hectares in 1998/99, fields, if present, were also searched. For the purpose of i.e. almost 60% of Indian production and 16% of world this survey, any tree on which Scarabaeids adults could production (Ali, 2003; Maneepun, 2003). Groundnut is, by be collected feeding and/or mating was considered to be a far, the largest single crop grown in central Deccan area, host tree. and is almost the only cash crop that will successfully grow in the region’s demineralised soils and highly variable 2.1.2. 1998 climate. Because of this, any biotic constraints to ground- During July 1998, and at the time of the first monsoon nut productivity have significant economic impacts at both rains, adult collections were made from six villages across the village and regional levels. the Anantapur district where damage to groundnut had Early reports of white grubs damaging groundnut in the been previously reported by farmers or non-government region include Husain (1974), Rao et al. (1976) and Pal organisations (NGOs). Beetles were hand-picked and/or (1977). These authors variously identified the pest species shaken from trees, especially wild ber, kalivi (Carissa spp., in Andhra Pradesh as H. consanguinea, Phyllophaga a spiny shrub usually entwined in neem trees), between consanguinea,orH. serrata. The present study aimed (a) 1900 and 2200 h and preserved in 75% ethyl alcohol for to clarify the uncertainties of species identity and distribu- later identification. Trees in and around a village were tion from these earlier reports because susceptibility to sampled in a semi-systematic manner, ensuring that all tree insecticides differs between Holotrichia species (Anitha species at the locality were examined. et al., in press), and (b) to identify any association between white grub incidence, edaphic and cropping system factors, 2.1.3. 1999 and the incidence of plant damage. This formed part of During this season, surveys were extended with the establishing a pest-management system for groundnuts in assistance of local NGOs working in Kolar, Raichur, ARTICLE IN PRESS 734 V.
Recommended publications
  • Stridulatory Organs in Asian Holotrichia Species © 2016 JEZS (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae) Received: 29-09-2016 Accepted: 30-10-2016
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(6): 207-210 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2016; 4(6): 207-210 Stridulatory organs in Asian Holotrichia species © 2016 JEZS (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae) Received: 29-09-2016 Accepted: 30-10-2016 Sara Lariza Rivera-Gasperín Sara Lariza Rivera-Gasperín and Miguel Ángel Morón Red de Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Carretera antigua Abstract a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa Elytral stridulatory organs in the Asiatic genus Holotrichia Hope are described. Structure and position of 91070, Veracruz, Mexico. such organs suggest that sound is produced by males and females by rubbing the internal edge of the hind femur (plectrum) on the ridge elytral epipleura (pars stridens). Similar stridulatory structures were also Miguel Ángel Morón found in some species of the closely related genera Sebakwe Péringuey, Microtrichia Brenske, Red de Biodiversidad y Octoplasia Brenske, Heptelia Brenske, Amphitrichia Brenske, Heptophylla Motschulsky, Latipalpus Sistemática, Instituto de Moser and Eotrichia Medvedev. Ecología, A.C., Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa Keywords: Scarab, stridulation, pars stridens, plectrum, morphology 91070, Veracruz, Mexico. 1. Introduction All stridulatory organs produce sound or vibration by friction and share the same basic [1] structure, consisting of two body parts moving against each other . The mechanism of stridulation involves a system that consists of two primary organs: a usually elevated fine parallel ribs (pars stridens) and a scraper (plectrum), which is essentially a mobile sharply [2] confined ridge that rubs against the pars stridens . Stridulation has been documented in many insect orders including Orthoptera, Odonata, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit Ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1
    Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Ag. Ento. 3.1 Fundamentals of Entomology Credit ours: (2+1=3) THEORY Part – I 1. History of Entomology in India. 2. Factors for insect‘s abundance. Major points related to dominance of Insecta in Animal kingdom. 3. Classification of phylum Arthropoda up to classes. Relationship of class Insecta with other classes of Arthropoda. Harmful and useful insects. Part – II 4. Morphology: Structure and functions of insect cuticle, moulting and body segmentation. 5. Structure of Head, thorax and abdomen. 6. Structure and modifications of insect antennae 7. Structure and modifications of insect mouth parts 8. Structure and modifications of insect legs, wing venation, modifications and wing coupling apparatus. 9. Metamorphosis and diapause in insects. Types of larvae and pupae. Part – III 10. Structure of male and female genital organs 11. Structure and functions of digestive system 12. Excretory system 13. Circulatory system 14. Respiratory system 15. Nervous system, secretary (Endocrine) and Major sensory organs 16. Reproductive systems in insects. Types of reproduction in insects. MID TERM EXAMINATION Part – IV 17. Systematics: Taxonomy –importance, history and development and binomial nomenclature. 18. Definitions of Biotype, Sub-species, Species, Genus, Family and Order. Classification of class Insecta up to Orders. Major characteristics of orders. Basic groups of present day insects with special emphasis to orders and families of Agricultural importance like 19. Orthoptera: Acrididae, Tettigonidae, Gryllidae, Gryllotalpidae; 20. Dictyoptera: Mantidae, Blattidae; Odonata; Neuroptera: Chrysopidae; 21. Isoptera: Termitidae; Thysanoptera: Thripidae; 22. Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Coreidae, Cimicidae, Pyrrhocoridae, Lygaeidae, Cicadellidae, Delphacidae, Aphididae, Coccidae, Lophophidae, Aleurodidae, Pseudococcidae; 23. Lepidoptera: Pieridae, Papiloinidae, Noctuidae, Sphingidae, Pyralidae, Gelechiidae, Arctiidae, Saturnidae, Bombycidae; 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology) Onwards Google Meet) on 15Th May, 2021 at 10 Am Participants: I
    Board of Studies Meeting (Department of Organised virtually (on Entomology) onwards google meet) on 15th May, 2021 at 10 am Participants: I. Prof. Nand Lal, Deppt. of life 2. Prof. C. P. science, CSJM Srivastav, Professor of University, Kanpur 3. Prof.Y. P. Entomology, B.H.U. Malik, Professor Varanasi of Entomology, CSA Kanpur Univ. of Agri. and Tech. 4. Dr. Dev Narayan Singh, Associate Professor, of College, Bakewar (Etawah) Deptt. Entomology, Janta 5. Dr. B. B. Singh, Assistant Professor, Mahavidyalay, Ajitmal (Auraiya) Deptt. of Entomology, Janta 6. Dr. Mahesh Prasad Yadav, Convenor and Associate Horticulture, Janta professor, Deptt. of College, Bakewar (Etawah) Minutes Of Meeting: BOS mecting of of deptt. Entomology was held to New Education adapt syllabus as under Policy (NEP 2020) with the suggested the presence of various renowed subjects. The outcomes of experts of meetings are as under. 1. Syllabus under suggested NEP 2020 is and implementation. accepted recommended for 2. Prof. Suggestions given by C. P. Srivastav and Prof. Y. minor P. Malik regarding ammendments and corrections have been 3. incorporated. Website names as well as books names have also been syllabus adapted by board. suggested in the 4. Board also that as the suggested per norms of ICAR the name of should be "Entomology". Department 5. Board also that master suggested degree in subject will be "M. Sc. Entomology" (Ag.) Enclosures: Corrected final of syllabus Entomology for B. Sc. (Ag.) programme. Prepared by: Dr. Dev Narayan Singh Convenor Dr. M. P. Yadav Department of Entomology Sr. Course semester No. code Name of papers AG-203 II Credit hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • IDENTIFICATION of the SEX PHEROMONE of Holotrichia Reynaudi
    P1: GDX/GDP Journal of Chemical Ecology [joec] pp414-joec-368127 February 19, 2002 16:44 Style file version Nov. 19th, 1999 Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 28, No. 3, March 2002 (C 2002) CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ICRISAT Open Access Repository IDENTIFICATION OF THE SEX PHEROMONE OF Holotrichia reynaudi ANDREW WARD,1,6 CHRIS MOORE,2,* V. ANITHA,3 JOHN WIGHTMAN,4 and D. JOHN ROGERS5 1Farming Systems Institute Department of Primary Industries PO Box 23, Kingaroy, Qld 4610, Australia 2Farming Systems Institute Department of Primary Industries 665 Fairfield Road, Yeerongpilly, Qld 4105, Australia 3International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India 4International Pest Management Conondale Cottage, Lot 7 Stanley River Road Maleny Qld 4552, Australia 5Farming Systems Institute Department of Primary Industries Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia 6Current address: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries PO Box 1346, Katherine, NT 0851, Australia (Received December 20, 2000; accepted October 27, 2001) Abstract—The male attractant pheromone of the scarab beetle Holotrichia reynaudi, an agricultural pest native to southern India, was extracted from ab- dominal glands of females with hexane and analyzed by gas chromatography– mass spectrometry. Field testing of the candidate chemicals, indole, phenol, and anisole, both alone and as binary mixtures, led us to conclude that anisole was the major component of the sex pheromone. Neither male nor female beetles were attracted to indole or phenol on their own. Similarly, when indole and anisole were combined, the attractiveness of the solution did not increase over that obtained with anisole alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Pesticides
    Facilitating Microbial Pesticide Use in Agriculture in South Asia Editors W.A.R.T. Wickramaarachchi SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC) Dhaka, Bangladesh Malvika Chaudhary Plantwise Asia, CABI-South Asia New Delhi, India Jagadeesh Patil ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR), Bengaluru, India SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC) South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) i Facilitating Microbial Pesticide Use in Agriculture in South Asia SAARC Regional Expert Consultation on Facilitating Microbial Pesticide Use in Agriculture in South Asia, 21-23 August 2017, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR), Bengaluru, India Editors W.A.R.T. Wickramaarachchi SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC), Dhaka, Bangladesh Malvika Chaudhary Plantwise Asia, CABI-South Asia, New Delhi, India Jagadeesh Patil ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR) Bengaluru, India December 2017 @ 2017 SAARC Agriculture Centre Published by the SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC), South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, BARC Complex, Farmgate, New Airport Road, Dhaka -1215, Bangladesh (www.sac.org.bd) All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise without prior permission of the publisher Citation Wickramaarachchi, W.A.R.T., Chaudhary, M. and Patil, J. (Eds). 2017. Facilitating Microbial Pesticide Use in Agriculture in South Asia. SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 226 pp Available online through www.sac.org.bd This book contains the papers and proceedings of the SAARC Regional Expert Consultation on Facilitating microbial pesticides use in agriculture in South Asia jointly organized by SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC), ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR) and The Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) at National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (NBAIR), Bengaluru, India from 21-23 August 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Population Dynamics of Phytophagous Scarabaeid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Different Landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, India
    Arthropods, 2015, 4(2): 46-68 Article Diversity and population dynamics of phytophagous scarabaeid beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in different landscapes of Himachal Pradesh, India Mandeep Pathania1,2, RS Chandel1, KS Verma1, PK Mehta1 1Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India 176062 2Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Abohar, Punjab, India 152116 E-mail: [email protected] Received 9 December 2014; Accepted 15 January 2015; Published online 1 June 2015 Abstract Scarabaeid beetles constitute a major group of defoliators of cultivated and wild plants. Therefore, it is important to understand their diversity, abundance and distribution for planning effective pest management programmes. We surveyed scarabaeid beetles from 8 landscapes from different zones in Himachal Pradesh (N 32o 29' and E 75o 10'), India. In 2011 and 2012, surveys were conducted during 4 months period (May-August) by using UV light traps. A total of 13,569 scarabaeid adults of 20 genera and 56 species belonging to subfamilies Melolonthinae, Rutelinae, Cetoniinae and Dynastinae were recorded. The five most common species were Brahmina coriacea, Adoretus lasiopygus, Anomala lineatopennis, Maladera insanabilis and Holotrichia longipennis. They comprised 9.88-10.05, 7.18-7.76, 7.13-7.27, 6.80-7.62 and 5.22-5.30% during 2011-12, respectively. Anomala (10 species) was the most dominant genus in the present study, whereas Melolonthinae was the most dominant subfamily accounting 53.23% of total scarabs collected from the study sites. Among different landscapes, Palampur had maximum diversity and abundance, while Shillaroo had least diversity but more abundance of single species B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    . JVASV^iX ^ N^ {/) lSNrNVIN0SHilWS*^S3ldVaan^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni <n - M ^^ <n 5 CO Z ^ ^ 2 ^—^ _j 2 -I RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVdan U r- ^ ^ 2 CD 4 A'^iitfwN r: > — w ? _ ISNI NVINOSHilWS SBiyVdan LIBRARIES'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION f^ <rt .... CO 2 2 2 s;- W to 2 C/J • 2 CO *^ 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS S3liiVyan_L; iiSNi"^NViNOSHiiNS S3iyvaan libraries smithsonian'^institution i^ 33 . z I/' ^ ^ (^ RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3lbVHan Li CO — -- — "> — IISNI NVINOSHimS S3IMVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION N' 2 -J 2 _j 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIifllliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSIMVyail L! MOTITI IT I f\t _NviN0SHiiws'^S3iMvaan libraries'^smithsonian^institution NOlin z \ '^ ^—s^ 5 <^ ^ ^ ^ '^ - /^w\ ^ /^^\ - ^^ ^ /^rf^\ - /^ o ^^^ — x.ii:i2Ji^ o ??'^ — \ii Z ^^^^^""-^ o ^^^^^ -» 2 _J Z -J , ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIXniliSNI NVINOSHillMS $3 I M VH 8 !!_ LI BR = C/> ± O) ^. ? CO I NVINOSHimS S3iaVHan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIlf CO ..-. CO 2 Z z . o .3 :/.^ C/)o Z u. ^^^ i to Z CO • z to * z > SMITHS0NIAN_1NSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHimS S3 I d ViJ 8 n_LI B R UJ i"'NViNOSHiiws S3ibvyan libraries smithsonian"^institution Noiir r~ > z r- Z r- 2: . CO . ^ ^ ^ ^ ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SSiyVMail LI BR CO . •» Z r, <^ 2 z 5 ^^4ii?^^ ^' X^W o ^"^- x life ^<ji; o ^'f;0: i >^ _NVIN0SHiIlMs'^S3iyVdan^LIBRARIEs'^SMITHS0NlAN INSTITUTION NOlif Z \ ^'^ ^-rr-^ 5 CO n CO CO o z > SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I ^Vd 8 11 LI BR >" _ . z 3 ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. SOKOLOFF fre s Assistant Editors J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostics of Major White Grub Species Associated with Potato Crop Ecosystem in Himachal Pradesh, India
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(9): 2545-2555 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) pp. 2545-2555 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.313 Diagnostics of Major White Grub Species Associated with Potato Crop Ecosystem in Himachal Pradesh, India Padala Vinod Kumar, K. Sreedevi* and Sukhwinder Singh Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The major white grub species associated with potato crop were surveyed in Himachal Pradesh, India during April to August, 2015. Adults were collected in the vicinity of potato K e yw or ds ecosystem by using light traps with black, mercury light sources and manual collection Melolonthinae, from trees on which they settled for feeding and mating. The survey revealed nine major Rutelinae, species of Scarabaeidae of which, four species are melolonthines viz., Brahmina coriacea Dynastinae, Potato, (Hope, 1837), Holotrichia longipennis (Blanchard, 1850), Holotrichia sikkimensis Himachal Pradesh. (Brenske, 1892), Holotrichia seticollis Moser, 1912, four species are rutelines viz., Article Info Anomala polita (Blanchard, 1851), Anomala lineatopennis Blanchard, 1851, Anomala dimidiata (Hope, 1831), Anomala propinqua Arrow, 1912 and one species of Dynastinae Accepted: i.e Phyllognathus dionysius (Fabricius, 1792). Of these, Anomala propinqua Arrow, 1912 26 August 2017 is reported for the first time in potato ecosystem. Present studies have brought out Available Online: illustrative diagnostic keys of white grub species associated with potato crop ecosystem 10 September 2017 that can be used at field level, where the identification of the species is very important from management point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature
    APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, along with the corresponding rejection code. · The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) • The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO FOREIGN) • The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) • The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX holding or through the literature search is considered public) • The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO REVIEW) • The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) • The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection Code: NO DURATION) • The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) • The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethology of Coconut Root Grub Chafer Leucopholis Coneophora Burmeister
    International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology (IJAFST) ISSN No. 2249-3050, Volume 4 No. 2 (2013) Ethology of coconut root grub chafer Leucopholis coneophora Burmeister (Melolonthinae: Scarabaeidae) P S Prathibha1, A R V Kumar2, K Subaharan1 1 Entomology, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, INDIA. 671124 2Dept. of Agri.Entomology, Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, University of Agricultural Sciences - Bangalore, INDIA 560065 ABSTRACT Root grub, Leucopholis coneophora Burm. is a polyphagous pest of coconut and intercrops grown in sandy loam soils in south India. It damages seedlings and adult palms by feeding on roots, boring the bole and collar regions. Understanding the ethology of the pest would aid to develop an ecofriendly pest management strategy. Though control measures have been developed, imperative need is there to search for newer method. On this line it was attempted to study the adult emergence pattern during 2011-2013 in root grub infe, Kerala. Adult emergence initiated on receipt of summer shower in third week of April in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The peak emergence attained during June, after the receipt of >200 mm rainfall. The emergence commenced when illuminance fell down to 124.37±75sted coconut gardens (N12º31.550’ E074 º58.081’) at CPCRI experimental farm, Kasaragod.5lx in the evening and prolonged up to 1.2±04lx. However, heavy rainfall during this part of the day delayed/stopped the emergence. Maximum swarming occurred at 32.6±15.1lx. Female emergence and mating started at 12.04±8.1 lx. The operational sex ratio was wider during initial days of emergence, which narrowed down in subsequent days.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of June Beetle, Holotrichia Species
    Special Issue on Computational Science, Mathematics and Biology IJCSME-SCSMB-16-March-2016 ISSN-2349-8439 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Molecular characterization of June beetle, Holotrichia species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) from India Kolla Sreedevi1, Asha Thomas2 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT: White grubs are the serious pests of agricultural and horticultural crops that belong to family Scarabaeidae of Order Coleoptera. Scarabaeidae that comprises of dung rollers and pestiferous species include numerous genera and Holotrichia Hope, 1837 is the largest genus covering several species. Studies have been carried out to analyse and present the mitochondrial COI gene sequences for five predominant species of Holotrichia viz., H. serrata (Fabricius, 1787), H. nagpurensis Khan and Ghai, 1982, H. consanguinea (Blanchard, 1851), H. longipennis (Blanchard, 1851) and H. sikkimensi sBrenske, 1893. The cluster analysis revealed two clades corroborating the morphological similarity. KEY WORDS: DNA barcoding, White and root grubs, Melolonthinae, Scarabaeidae ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION The light traps were installed at the time of dusk during White grubs are the universal pests of several agricultural, May to July. Three light traps were set in white grub horticultural, forest crops and turf grasses that belong to endemic areas of three
    [Show full text]