DOCSLIB.ORG

Efl Learners' Phonological Interference of English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EFL LEARNERS’ PHONOLOGICAL INTERFERENCE OF ENGLISH ARTICULATION Ambalegin1 Universitas Putera Batam, Batam, Indonesia [email protected] Fasaaro Hulu2 Universitas Putera Batam, Batam, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract This research investigated the mispronunciation of Putera Batam University EFL learners by adapting the standard of Received Pronunciation (RP) and the factors of English vowels and consonants mispronunciation. This descriptive qualitative research applied observational method with participatory technique in collecting data, and articulatory identity method in analyzing the data. The English mispronunciation was found in the EFL learners‟ English pronunciation. The consonant sounds /ð/, /θ/, /th/, /z/, /r/, /ʃ/, /ʧ/, /ʤ/, /nj/, and consonant-closed syllable sound of /k/ were pronounced incorrectly. The consonant sound /ð/ was pronounced as /d/, /θ/ as /t/, /th/ as /t/, /z/as /ɉ/, /r/ as /ɾ/, /ʃ/ as /s/, /ʧ/ as /s/, /ʤ/ as /d/, and /nj/ is pronounced as /ɲ/. Consonant-closed syllable sound of /k/ is articulated as /Ɂ/. The vowel sounds /ə/ and /æ/ were pronounced incorrectly as /e/ and the diphthong sound /eɪ/ were pronounced incorrectly as /e/. These mispronunciation phenomena were caused by some factors based on their background. The factors were; the mother tongue interference (native language), the differences between Indonesian and English sound systems (phonetic ability), the educational background, and the environmental background (amount of exposure). Keywords: consonants, mispronunciation, Received Pronunciation (RP), vowels 1. INTRODUCTION English is taught as a foreign language Speaking foreign language has been in schools with Standard English. Standard sighted as the most demanding of the four English is generally used in the news, media, skills. For the most people, speaking ability is and in literary works. Standard English is related to knowing the language since sometimes used as a cover term for all speaking is the most fundamental principle of standard varieties of English such as spelling, the human communication (Celce-Murcia, vocabulary, grammar, and particularly 2001). What makes speaking second or pronunciation. Learning pronunciation foreign language difficult? Many of SL or FL possess the Received Pronunciation (RP). RP speakers were shocked when they used their becomes more and more widely spoken SL or FL for the first time in the real accents in formal schools. But nowadays interaction. Brown (2007) stated that American English (AE) exposes to a lot of speaking is seen as the central skill, the he TV programs, in films, in literature more than agreed that speaking is the integration of British English (BE). Nevertheless AE and many subsystems to make speaking a second BE are not too separated languages. Each or foreign language and becomes formidable area of English speaking has developed its task for language learners yet for many own special characteristics, e.g. vocabulary people. In oral way all elements must be and pronunciation. involved, according to Harris (as cited in 145 | P a g e Ambalegin, Suhardianto, & Kaprawi, 2017), mother tongue or native language as a home pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, fluency, language will form the speaker‟s speech and comprehension are the basic important organ system as well as the native-accent and elements of speaking. mother tongue-accent (Ambalegin & Suryani, Hinofotis and Baily (as cited in 2018). Ambalegin & Arianto, 2018) said that neither EFL students who learned English vocabulary nor grammar makes ESL/EFL faced difficulties in speaking English. learners faulty but pronunciation is in Pronunciation is the important skill in communication process. EFL students must speaking English (Gilakjani as cited in Lin, concern pronunciation as one of the top 2014). Pronunciation brings a meaningful priorities (Davis as cited in Ambalegin & instruction in teaching English as FL. Arianto, 2019). Fraser (as cited in Gilakjani, Problem in pronouncing weakens the 2016) mentioned that English-spoken ability communicative competence. However, many includes vocabulary, grammar, and of university students lack sufficient pragmatic, etc. of which pronunciation is far proficiency in pronouncing even if English is from the most important, and she argued that taught since elementary level. Needless to with a good pronunciation, a speaker is say, teaching correct pronunciation intelligibly drives away from the errors; poor emphasizes to acknowledge errors in pronunciation, English difficult pronunciation and correct them in order to understanding, despite accuracy in other improve the ability of students‟ areas. pronunciation. Teaching pronunciation is Having had experience in teaching fundamentally important for the EFL pronunciation to EFL first semester learners learners. Teaching pronunciation is focused at Putera Batam University, whose students on the segmental features and stress and are able to speak Indonesian from some intonation. However, many teaching ethnicities such as Batak Toba-nese and materials still do not make clear that Karonese (North Sumatera), Javanese (Java), pronunciation is just one tiny piece of the Minangnese (West Sumatera), Malay whole course credits. Seidlhofer (as cited in (Kepulauan Riau), Oki (Palembang), Kemak Murcia, 2001) clearly said that pronunciation and Marae (East Nusa Tenggara), Buginese never ends itself but a means of negotiating and Makassarese (South Sulawesi), and meaning in discourse, embedded in Chinese experience difficulty in pronouncing sociocultural and interpersonal contexts. English sounds such as the combination of Pronunciation instruction needs to be taught <th>, the end sound of <ch>, and the end as communicative interaction along with sound /k/. Experiencing the English other aspects of spoken discourse such as pronunciation difficulties made by the EFL pragmatic meaning and nonverbal learners, it investigated the incorrect English communication. pronunciation and the factors of incorrect Allen (as cited in Hakim, 2012) stated English pronunciation made by the EFL that pronunciation has a big contribution for students. better English speaking. Learning pronunciation is not as simple as a process of 2. LITERATURE REVIEW memorizing a number of items that can be 2.1 Vowels, Diphthongs, Triphthongs, and mapped on to mother tongue. Indonesia has a Consonants lot of mother tongues that also interfere other 1. Vowels languages‟ pronunciation. By the use of 146 | P a g e Low (2015) described that vowels are Roach (2012) stated that triphthongs the sound production of with no obstruction have the most complicated vowel sounds as in the vocal tract. According to Kelly (2004), they are difficult to be articulated, and there are three categories of vowel sounds recognized. A triphthong is a collaboration of based on the characteristics of the three vowel sounds where tongue rapidly and articulation; closed vowel sounds (/i:/ /ɪ/ /ʊ/ uninterruptedly moves away from first vowel /u:/), mid vowel sounds (/e/ /ə/ /з:/ /ͻ:/), and articulation to another vowel articulation, open vowel sounds (/æ/ /ʌ/ /ɑ:/ /ɒ/). then to a third vowel. Roach (2012) listed the a. Vowel Length triphthongs with five close diphthongs with Vowel length is important in English schwa /ə/ eɪə (as in mayor, crayon), aɪə (as in pronunciation to distinct feature in the choir, buyer), ɔɪə (as in loyal, royal), əʊə (as language. this as /ðis/ and these as /ði:s/ in lower, mower), and aʊə (as in flower, experience different meaning due to the coward). different vowel sound length. Colon [;] marks 4. Consonants the long vowels (McMahon, 2002). A consonant is produced by a partial b. Reduced Vowel or complete close of vocal tract (Finegan, There are some letters pronounced 2015). Speech sound is able to be silently (Okeke, 2008). build is pronounced characterized based on the articulatory as /bIld/ that there is no <u> pronounced. properties. The consonants are articulated in Vowels are able to be omitted in some three characteristics: voicing, place of contexts because some extended following articulation, and manner of articulation (Low, syllabic consonant /r/, /l/, /n/ in the syllable 2015). Completely, Low (2015) and Yule absorb the vowel sound such as recruit as (2014) described three term labels describing /rIkrʊt/, bottle as /bɒtl/, and minute as /mInIt/. the main characteristic. c. Nasalization a. Voicing Nasalized vowels are indicated by a It can be heard by differentiating tilde (~) marked above the vowels [ȇ] [ȗ]. between [t] and [d]. When /d/ and /t/ are Vowels are able to be nasalized when air pronounced, the position of tongue within the passes through the nasal cavity. mouth is the same, but these sounds are 2. Diphthongs different from the vibration in the larynx There are three categories of when pronounces /d/ that it is called voicing diphthong sounds based on the characteristics (Low, 2015). of the articulation; centering diphthongs (/ɪə/ b. Place of Articulation /ʊə/ /eə/), closing diphthong ending in /ɪ/ (/eɪ/ Place of articulation produced /ͻɪ/ /aɪ/), and closing diphthong ending in /ʊ/ different sounds due to the airflow in the lips, (/əʊ/ /ʌʊ/). oral and nasal cavity, pharynx, and glottis Finegan (2015) stated that diphthong (Low, 2015). According to Yule (as cited in is produced when the tongue starts producing Al-Zayed, 2017), the seven kinds place of vowel in one place and glides to another. articulation; bilabials, labiodentals, dentals, Kelly (as cited in Ambalegin & Arianto, alveolar, palatal, velar, and
Recommended publications
  • Vowel Sounds Can Symbolise the Felt Heaviness of Obje

    Vowel Sounds Can Symbolise the Felt Heaviness of Obje

    CORRESPONDENCES AND SYMBOLISM Cross-Sensory Correspondences in Language: Vowel Sounds can Symbolise the Felt Heaviness of Objects Peter Walker1,2 & Caroline Regina Parameswaran2 1 Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, UK 2 Department of Psychology, Sunway University, Malaysia Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Peter Walker, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1524 593163 fax: +44 (0) 1524 593744 1 CORRESPONDENCES AND SYMBOLISM Abstract In sound symbolism, a word's sound induces expectations about the nature of a salient aspect of the word's referent. Walker (2016a) proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can be the source of these expectations and the present study assessed three implications flowing from this proposal. First, sound symbolism will embrace a wide range of referent features, including heaviness. Second, any feature of a word's sound able to symbolise one aspect of the word's referent will also be able to symbolise corresponding aspects of the referent (e.g., a sound feature symbolising visual pointiness will also symbolise lightness in weight). Third, sound symbolism will be independent of the sensory modality through which a word's referent is encoded (e.g., whether heaviness is felt or seen). Adults judged which of two contrasting novel words was most appropriate as a name for the heavier or lighter of two otherwise identical hidden novel objects they were holding in their hands. The alternative words contrasted in their vowels and/or consonants, one or both of which were known to symbolise visual pointiness. Though the plosive or continuant nature of the consonants did not influence the judged appropriateness of a word to symbolise the heaviness of its referent, back/open vowels, compared to front/close vowels, were judged to symbolise felt heaviness.
  • SSC: the Science of Talking

    SSC: the Science of Talking

    SSC: The Science of Talking (for year 1 students of medicine) Week 3: Sounds of the World’s Languages (vowels and consonants) Michael Ashby, Senior Lecturer in Phonetics, UCL PLIN1101 Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology A Lecture 4 page 1 Vowel Description Essential reading: Ashby & Maidment, Chapter 5 4.1 Aim: To introduce the basics of vowel description and the main characteristics of the vowels of RP English. 4.2 Definition of vowel: Vowels are produced without any major obstruction of the airflow; the intra-oral pressure stays low, and vowels are therefore sonorant sounds. Vowels are normally voiced. Vowels are articulated by raising some part of the tongue body (that is the front or the back of the tongue notnot the tip or blade) towards the roof of the oral cavity (see Figure 1). 4.3 Front vowels are produced by raising the front of the tongue towards the hard palate. Back vowels are produced by raising the back of the tongue towards the soft palate. Central vowels are produced by raising the centre part of the tongue towards the junction of the hard and soft palates. 4.4 The height of a vowel refers to the degree of raising of the relevant part of the tongue. If the tongue is raised so as to be close to the roof of the oral cavity then a close or high vowel is produced. If the tongue is only slightly raised, so that there is a wide gap between its highest point and the roof of the oral cavity, then an open or lowlowlow vowel results.
  • Glossary of Key Terms

    Glossary of Key Terms

    Glossary of Key Terms accent: a pronunciation variety used by a specific group of people. allophone: different phonetic realizations of a phoneme. allophonic variation: variations in how a phoneme is pronounced which do not create a meaning difference in words. alveolar: a sound produced near or on the alveolar ridge. alveolar ridge: the small bony ridge behind the upper front teeth. approximants: obstruct the air flow so little that they could almost be classed as vowels if they were in a different context (e.g. /w/ or /j/). articulatory organs – (or articulators): are the different parts of the vocal tract that can change the shape of the air flow. articulatory settings or ‘voice quality’: refers to the characteristic or long-term positioning of articulators by individual or groups of speakers of a particular language. aspirated: phonemes involve an auditory plosion (‘puff of air’) where the air can be heard passing through the glottis after the release phase. assimilation: a process where one sound is influenced by the characteristics of an adjacent sound. back vowels: vowels where the back part of the tongue is raised (like ‘two’ and ‘tar’) bilabial: a sound that involves contact between the two lips. breathy voice: voice quality where whisper is combined with voicing. cardinal vowels: a set of phonetic vowels used as reference points which do not relate to any specific language. central vowels: vowels where the central part of the tongue is raised (like ‘fur’ and ‘sun’) centring diphthongs: glide towards /ə/. citation form: the way we say a word on its own. close vowel: where the tongue is raised as close as possible to the roof of the mouth.
  • Learning [Voice]

    Learning [Voice]

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Fall 2010 Learning [Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the First and Second Language Acquisition Commons Recommended Citation Tauberer, Joshua Ian, "Learning [Voice]" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 288. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 Please see my home page, http://razor.occams.info, for the data files and scripts that make this reproducible research. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Learning [Voice] Abstract The [voice] distinction between homorganic stops and fricatives is made by a number of acoustic correlates including voicing, segment duration, and preceding vowel duration. The present work looks at [voice] from a number of multidimensional perspectives. This dissertation's focus is a corpus study of the phonetic realization of [voice] in two English-learning infants aged 1;1--3;5. While preceding vowel duration has been studied before in infants, the other correlates of post-vocalic voicing investigated here --- preceding F1, consonant duration, and closure voicing intensity --- had not been measured before in infant speech. The study makes empirical contributions regarding the development of the production of [voice] in infants, not just from a surface- level perspective but also with implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in the adult and developing linguistic systems. Additionally, several methodological contributions will be made in the use of large sized corpora and data modeling techniques. The study revealed that even in infants, F1 at the midpoint of a vowel preceding a voiced consonant was lower by roughly 50 Hz compared to a vowel before a voiceless consonant, which is in line with the effect found in adults.
  • Northern Tosk Albanian

    Northern Tosk Albanian

    1 Northern Tosk Albanian 1 1 2 Stefano Coretta , Josiane Riverin-Coutlée , Enkeleida 1,2 3 3 Kapia , and Stephen Nichols 1 4 Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing, 5 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München 2 6 Academy of Albanological Sciences 3 7 Linguistics and English Language, University of Manchester 8 29 July 2021 9 1 Introduction 10 Albanian (endonym: Shqip; Glotto: alba1268) is an Indo-European lan- 11 guage which has been suggested to form an independent branch of the 12 Indo-European family since the middle of the nineteenth century (Bopp 13 1855; Pedersen 1897; Çabej 1976). Though the origin of the language has 14 been debated, the prevailing opinion in the literature is that it is a descend- 15 ant of Illyrian (Hetzer 1995). Albanian is currently spoken by around 6–7 16 million people (Rusakov 2017; Klein et al. 2018), the majority of whom 17 live in Albania and Kosovo, with others in Italy, Greece, North Macedonia 18 and Montenegro. Figure 1 shows a map of the main Albanian-speaking 19 areas of Europe, with major linguistic subdivisions according to Gjinari 20 (1988) and Elsie & Gross (2009) marked by different colours and shades. 21 At the macro-level, Albanian includes two main varieties: Gheg, 22 spoken in Northern Albania, Kosovo and parts of Montenegro and North 1 Figure 1: Map of the Albanian-speaking areas of Europe. Subdivisions are based on Gjinari (1988) and Elsie & Gross (2009). CC-BY-SA 4.0 Stefano Coretta, Júlio Reis. 2 23 Macedonia; and Tosk, spoken in Southern Albania and in parts of Greece 24 and Southern Italy (von Hahn 1853; Desnickaja 1976; Demiraj 1986; Gjin- 25 ari 1985; Beci 2002; Shkurtaj 2012; Gjinari et al.
  • The Nature of Vocoids Associated with Syllabic Consonants in Tashlhiyt Berber

    The Nature of Vocoids Associated with Syllabic Consonants in Tashlhiyt Berber

    THE NATURE OF VOCOIDS ASSOCIATED WITH SYLLABIC CONSONANTS IN TASHLHIYT BERBER John Coleman University of Oxford, UK ABSTRACT pronounced as [4], >T], or >^], with brief vocoids before and Tashlhiyt Berber has entered the phonological folklore as an sometimes after the tap, and between the individual closures of unusual language in which any consonant can be syllabic, many trills. Consonants may be contrastively geminate, even word- words consisting entirely of consonants. I shall argue for an initially (e.g. /VVI9I9C/ ‘be washing clothes’). Typically for an alternative analysis, according to which the epenthetic vowels Afroasiatic language, many words are formed by intercalating which frequently accompany syllabic consonants are the phonetic realizations of syllable nuclei. Where no epenthetic vowel is independent vowel and consonant melodies, e.g. singular C5CM95 K5WMC5 evident, it can be regarded as hidden by the following consonant, / / ‘pile of stones’, plural / /. I shall refer to phonemic according to a gestural overlap model. On this view, Tashlhiyt /i/, /u/, and /a/ as ‘lexical vowels’ and to the so-called syllable structure is a quite unmarked CV(C(C)), and ‘transitional schwas’ as ‘epenthetic vowels’. syllabification is unproblematic. 2. MATERIALS 1. INTRODUCTION 2.1. Recordings Many influential phonology texts (e.g. [9, 13]) repeat Dell and In the absence of a Tashlhiyt dictionary, an unsorted list of 555 Elmedlaoui’s analysis of Tashlhiyt [3], which holds that all words was collated from various papers. Each word was written µ µ µ Tashlhiyt phonemes, even obstruents, are sometimes syllabic, and down in the frame sentence “ini za — yat tklit CF P KP ” (‘please that numerous words consist only of consonants (e.g.
  • Stamford Journal of English

    Stamford Journal of English

    A synchronic comparison between the vowel phonemes of Bengali & English phonology and its classroom applicability ALEEYA TAMZIDA & SHARMIN SIDDIQUI Abstract Due to linguistic diversity, phonologies of the world are notably different from one another, leading the foreign language learners encounter varied phonetic and phonological problems. Bengali speaking EFL learners face problems especially in pronunciation owing to their lack of sound knowledge regarding the distinct positions of phonemes and other aspects of Bengali and English phonology. In this context, our attempt, particularly in this article, is to compare the positions of Bengali and English vowel phonemes and identify the distinctions existing between those in order to help the Bengali speaking EFL learners to improve their pronunciation. Mainly, English vowels (RP) Diagram, Bengali vowels diagram, Cardinal vowels diagram etc have been examined to identify the distinctions mentioned. This paper shows the applicability of our findings by presenting some survey results and suggests some measures to be followed by learners to improve their pronunciation. 1. Introduction: Linguistic diversity among different races, leads to a wide variety of phonologies in the world. According to David Abercrombie (1967), ‘The phonology of every language is peculiar to that language, and different from that of every other language’ (p. 70). And this difference leads the EFL learner face difficulties regarding phonetic, phonological and other aspects of language in speech production and speech perception. Because EFL learners may come across some phonemes or features of the target language which are totally absent from their own phonologies. As a consequence, they suffer from mispronunciation in speech production as well as wrong auditory perception in 285 the foreign language.
  • The Tiberian Pronunciation Tradition of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1

    The Tiberian Pronunciation Tradition of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 1

    Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures The Tiberian Pronunciation Khan Tradition of Biblical Hebrew (Vol. I) The Tiberian Pronunciation Geoffrey Khan Tradition of Biblical Hebrew The form of Biblical Hebrew that is presented in printed edi� ons, with vocaliza� on and Tradition of Biblical Hebrew Vol. I accent signs, has its origin in medieval manuscripts of the Bible. The vocaliza� on and Volume I accent signs are nota� on systems that were created in Tiberias in the early Islamic period The Tiberian Pronunciation The by scholars known as the Tiberian Masoretes, but the oral tradi� on they represent has roots in an� quity. The gramma� cal textbooks and reference grammars of Biblical Hebrew in use today are heirs to centuries of tradi� on of gramma� cal works on Biblical Hebrew in GEOFFREY KHAN Europe. The paradox is that this European tradi� on of Biblical Hebrew grammar did not have direct access to the way the Tiberian Masoretes were pronouncing Biblical Hebrew. In the last few decades, research of manuscript sources from the medieval Middle East has made it possible to reconstruct with considerable accuracy the pronuncia� on of the Tiberian Masoretes, which has come to be known as the ‘Tiberian pronuncia� on tradi� on’. This book presents the current state of knowledge of the Tiberian pronuncia� on tradi� on of Biblical Hebrew and a full edi� on of one of the key medieval sources, Hidāyat al-Qāriʾ ‘The Guide for the Reader’, by ʾAbū al-Faraj Hārūn. It is hoped that the book will help to break the mould of current gramma� cal descrip� ons of Biblical Hebrew and form a bridge between modern tradi� ons of grammar and the school of the Masoretes of Tiberias.
  • An Electropalatographic and Acoustic Study of Affricates and Fricatives in Two Catalan Dialects

    An Electropalatographic and Acoustic Study of Affricates and Fricatives in Two Catalan Dialects

    An electropalatographic and acoustic study of affricates and fricatives in two Catalan dialects Daniel Recasens Universitat Autonoma` de Barcelona & Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona [email protected] Aina Espinosa Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona The present study is an electropalatographic and acoustic investigation of the fricatives /s, S/ and the affricates /ts, dz, tS, dZ/ based on data from five speakers of Majorcan Catalan and five speakers of Valencian Catalan. Results show that the articulatory characteristics of fricatives and affricates agree in several respects: the sounds traditionally labeled /S/ and /tS, dZ/ are alveolopalatal, and are articulated at a less anterior location, are less constricted and show more dorsopalatal contact than the alveolars /s/ and /ts, dz/; the two place categories are closer to each other in Valencian than in Majorcan. Compared to voiceless affricates, voiced affricates are more anterior and more constricted, and show less dorsopalatal contact. Data also show that closure location for /tS, dZ/ occurs at the alveolar zone, and that articulatory differences among affricates are better specified at frication than at closure. Strict homorganicity between the stop and frication components of affricates appears to hold provided that constriction location at frication is compared with place of articulation at closure offset. In comparison to voiceless affricates, voiced affricates were shorter, and exhibited a longer closure and a shorter frication period, in Majorcan; in Valencian, on the other hand, closures were shortest for /dZ/, and frication was systematically longer for voiceless vs. voiced affricates. These duration data appear to conform to a universal trend in Valencian but not in Majorcan where voiced affricates are lengthened intentionally.
  • Formant Characteristics of Malay Vowels

    Formant Characteristics of Malay Vowels

    International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2020, pp. 144~152 ISSN: 2252-8822, DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20421 144 Formant characteristics of Malay vowels Izzad Ramli1, Nursuriati Jamil2, Norizah Ardi3 1,2Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia 3Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia Article Info ABSTRACT Article history: The purpose of this study was to investigate and examined the eight vowels formant characteristic of Malay language. Previous research of Malay Received Dec 3, 2019 language only investigated six basic vowels /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/, /ə/. Revised Jan 28, 2020 The vowels /ɔ/, /ε/ that usually exist in a dialect were not included in Accepted Feb19, 2020 the previous investigations. In this study, the vowels sound were collected from five men and four women producing the vowels /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/, /ə/, /ɔ/, /ε/ from different regions and dialects in Malaysia. Formant contours, F1 Keywords: until F4 of the vowels were measured using interactive editing tool called Praat. Analysis of the formant data showed numerous differences between Acoustic phonetic vowels in terms of average frequencies of F1 and F2, and the degree of Formant analysis overlap among adjacent vowels. When compared with the International International phonetic alphabet Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), most pronunciation of the Malay vowels were at Malay vowels the same position but the vowel /ε/ seen more likely to become a front vowel Vowel chart instead of a central vowel. Consequently, vowel features of the two Malay allophones /ɔ/ and /ε/ were documented and added to the IPA vowel chart.
  • Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, Tauberer@Babel.Ling.Upenn.Edu

    Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarlyCommons@Penn University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Fall 12-22-2010 Learning [Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the First and Second Language Acquisition Commons Recommended Citation Tauberer, Joshua Ian, "Learning [Voice]" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 288. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 Please see my home page, http://razor.occams.info, for the data files and scripts that make this reproducible research. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Learning [Voice] Abstract The v[ oice] distinction between homorganic stops and fricatives is made by a number of acoustic correlates including voicing, segment duration, and preceding vowel duration. The present work looks at [voice] from a number of multidimensional perspectives. This dissertation's focus is a corpus study of the phonetic realization of [voice] in two English-learning infants aged 1;1--3;5. While preceding vowel duration has been studied before in infants, the other correlates of post- vocalic voicing investigated here --- preceding F1, consonant duration, and closure voicing intensity --- had not been measured before in infant speech. The tudys makes empirical contributions regarding the development of the production of [voice] in infants, not just from a surface-level perspective but also with implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in the adult and developing linguistic systems.
  • Syllable Weight: Phonetic Duration and Phonemic Contrast*

    Syllable Weight: Phonetic Duration and Phonemic Contrast*

    Syllable Weight: Phonetic Duration and Phonemic Contrast* Mee-Jin Ahn CKyung Hee University) Ahn, Mee-Jin. (2003). Syllable weight: phonetic duration and phonemic contrast. Language Research 39(2), 355-381. This paper addresses two questions: why, in quantity-sensitive systems, do evv and eve syllables constitute better stress targets than ev syllables, and why does the weight of eve syllables vary? I argue that evv syllables are optimal stress targets because their long vowel duration allows for the best expression of the phonetic correlates of stress. Although eve syllables appear to attract stress in some languages, this attraction should be understood as a consequence of stress repulsion from ev syllables. The stress attraction of eve syllables occurs only where ev syllabYes are subject to positional vowel lengthening and stress-induced lengthenfng. In this position, ev syllables repel stress to preserve the phonemic contrast of vowel length. eve syllables are protected from extreme vowel lengthening in the same positions due to closed syllable shortening. I present exper­ imental evidence from Jordanian Arabic where only evv and eve sylla­ bles attract stress in penultimate position, to support my claim that \'owel lengthening effects in penultimate ev syllables are extreme. As' a result, ev syllables avoid stress to maintain their phonemic vowel length and eve and evv syllables receive stress in the target position. I conclude that eve syllables are not inherent stress attractors at all. Key words: syllable weight, phonetic vowel duration, phonemic vowel length contrast, Jordanian Arabic 1. Introduction The position of stress is sensitive to the distinction between heavy and light syllables in many languages.