DOCSLIB.ORG

ARO4: the Late Neolithic Pitchstone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARO4: the Late Neolithic Pitchstone ARO4: The Late Neolithic pitchstone artefacts from Barnhouse, Orkney – an unusual assemblage from an unusual site By Torben Bjarke Ballin Lithic Research/Honorary Research Fellow, University of Bradford Archaeology Reports Online, 52 Elderpark Workspace, 100 Elderpark Street, Glasgow, G51 3TR 0141 445 8800 | [email protected] | www.archaeologyreportsonline.com ARO4: The Late Neolithic pitchstone artefacts from Barnhouse, Orkney – an unusual assemblage from an unusual site Published by GUARD Archaeology Ltd, www.archaeologyreportsonline.com Editor Beverley Ballin Smith Design and desktop publishing Gillian McSwan Produced by GUARD Archaeology Ltd 2013 ISBN: 978-0-9575435-3-9 ISSN: 2052-4064 Requests for permission to reproduce material from an ARO report should be sent to the Editor of ARO, as well as to the author, illustrator, photographer or other copyright holder. Copyright in any of the ARO Reports series rests with GUARD Archaeology Ltd and the individual authors. The maps are reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. All rights reserved. GUARD Archaeology Licence number 100050699. The consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, advertising or promotional purposes, the creation of new collective works or resale. ARO4: The Late Neolithic pitchstone artefacts from Barnhouse, Orkney – an unusual assemblage from an unusual site. Introduction • examine and catalogue all archaeological pitchstone in Scottish museums; In the late 1980s, Colin Richards, University of Manchester, excavated an extensive Late • produce a computer database of these Neolithic settlement at Barnhouse on Orkney finds; (Richards 2005) (Figure 1). The excavation • re-interpret the distribution of archaeo- revealed a number of house structures of Skara logical pitchstone across northern Britain. Brae type (Clarke & Maguire 1989; Foster 2006), and in and around these houses a large lithic In total, 5,542 pieces of worked pitchstone assemblage of 1,585 pieces was recovered were examined and characterised during the (Middleton 2005). This assemblage consisted project, deriving from approximately 350 sites. mainly of flint, but a surprisingly numerous sub- In addition, 14,707 pieces were included in the assemblage of pitchstone artefacts (23 pieces) database of none-examined artefacts, deriving was also retrieved. from c. 125 sites. Approximately 13,300 of the latter were retrieved in connection with Glasgow University’s Archaeological Research Division’s work on Arran in 1999. The results of the examination of the museum collections (supplemented by finds still with the excavating units) have been summarised, revealing an interesting distribution. Prior to this work, it was the author’s subjective impression that Neolithic Scotland may have been sub-divided into a number of main zones or potential territorial units (I-IV), based on the average number of pitchstone artefacts in pitchstone-bearing assemblages. This impression is supported by the figures from the SAPP (Table 1; Figure 2; see zonation in Figure 4 below). With the future inclusion of further assemblages, these figures may change but the four numerically based groups are likely to remain. In Table 1, the regions are sequenced according to their distance from Arran, the probable source Figure 1: Location map. of all archaeological pitchstone. The approximate area and location of each zone (see below, Figure Present consensus is that all, or almost all, 4). archaeological pitchstone derives from sources on the Isle of Arran in the Firth of Clyde (Williams Zones Numbers Thorpe and Thorpe 1984), from where it was Arran 230 distributed across northern Britain by means IIW 14 of a wide-ranging exchange network. However, IISW 33 Williams Thorpe and Thorpe’s pioneering III 3 research into this topic was carried out at a time IV 2 when relatively little archaeological pitchstone Orkney 14 had been retrieved. Since then much worked pitchstone has been recovered. This has altered Table 1: Average number of pitchstone artefacts per pitchstone-bearing assemblage per region. the distribution patterns considerably, and as a consequence, a project was undertaken to look into archaeological pitchstone and its distribution (Ballin 2009b; 2011c). The aims of the Scottish Archaeological Pitchstone Project (SAPP) were to: 3 © Archaeology Reports Online, 2013. All rights reserved. ARO4: The Late Neolithic pitchstone artefacts from Barnhouse, Orkney – an unusual assemblage from an unusual site. The pitchstone types are defined in the raw material section (below); the definitions of the main lithic categories are as follows: Chips: All flakes and indeterminate pieces the greatest dimension (GD) of which is £ 10mm. Flakes: All lithic artefacts with one identifiable ventral (positive or convex) surface, GD > 10mm and L < 2W (L = length; W = width). Figure 2: Average number of pitchstone artefacts per Indeterminate pieces: Lithic artefacts which can- pitchstone-bearing assemblage per zone. not be unequivocally identified as either flakes or cores. Generally the problem of Referring to Table 1 and Figure 2, it is obvious that identification is due to irregular breaks, the Barnhouse finds represent a deviation from frost-shattering or fire-crazing. ‘Chunks’ an otherwise logical distribution pattern. Forming is a popular term for larger indeterminate part of Distribution Group IV (‘peripheral’ sites), pieces. approximately two pitchstone artefacts should have been expected from an Orcadian pitchstone- Blades and microblades: Flakes where L ³ 2W. In bearing assemblage - not 23 pieces! The aims of the case of blades W > 8mm, in the case this paper are therefore to give a more detailed of microblades W £ 8mm. characterisation of this unusual group of lithic Cores: Artefacts with only dorsal (negative or con- artefacts by allowing comparison with published cave) surfaces – if three or more flakes pitchstone assemblages from southern Scotland, have been detached, the piece is a core, such as Auchategan, Blackpark Plantation and if fewer than three flakes have been de- the Biggar sites (Ballin 2006; Ballin et al. 2008; tached, the piece is a split or flaked peb- Ballin & Ward 2008), and to place the Barnhouse ble. pitchstone in its Scottish Neolithic context by Tools: Artefacts with secondary retouch (modif drawing on the latest information gained via cation). the SAPP and recent research into the Scottish Neolithic. Raw material The Assemblage In order to characterise the Barnhouse pitchstone precisely, it is necessary to briefly summarise what From the excavations at Barnhouse, 23 pitchstone pitchstone is, and to define its main components. artefacts were recovered. (see Table 2). Pitchstone is a volcanic glass, which is found as two main forms. One is obsidian (< 1% H O), Type 1 Type 2 Total 2 whereas the other is pitchstone (typically 3-10% Debitage H O). Most pitchstone has > 5% H O, and most Chips 2 2 2 2 Flakes 5 7 12 obsidian < 0.5%. Volcanic glass is known from Blades 2 2 igneous complexes throughout the world, but in Crested flakes 1 1 Britain it is only found in western Scotland and Total debitage 10 7 17 Northern Ireland (the British Tertiary Volcanic Province; Emeleus and Bell 2005). All volcanic Cores glass found in Britain is in the form of pitchstone, Levallois-like cores 1 1 and it is generally accepted that only pitchstone Other discoidal cores 1 1 from the island of Arran, immediately west of Bipolar cores 1 1 Glasgow (Figure 1), had the properties required Cores total 3 3 to become widely used as a toolstone. Tools As explained in Ballin and Faithfull (2009), Blade-scrapers 1 1 pitchstone may be described in terms of a number Flakes with edge-retouch 2 2 of components, such as: Total tools 2 1 3 • Glassy matrix. TOTAL 15 8 23 Table 2: General artefact list. © Archaeology Reports Online, 2013. All rights reserved. 4 ARO4: The Late Neolithic pitchstone artefacts from Barnhouse, Orkney – an unusual assemblage from an unusual site. • Phenocrysts: larger isolated or clustered crystals formed at depth during slow cool- ing. • Spherulites: finely crystalline, usually radi- ating intergrowths of quartz and feldspar indicating devitrification of the glass phase. • Crystallites (in older literature occasion- ally termed microlites): very small skeletal or dendritic crystals, often Fe-Mg silicates, in glass; banding in pitchstones is often marked by variation in crystallite density. • Other alteration products. Tyrrell (1928) distinguishes between four main types of pitchstone, and they are defined, primarily, by their presence/absence of phenocrysts and spherulites, phenocryst composition, and style of devitrification. The four pitchstone types are: the Coriegills Type (east Arran), the Glenshurig Type (north-east Arran), the Glen Cloy Type (north-east Arran), and the Tormore Type (west Arran). Usually, specialised Plate 1: Debitage in pitchstone Type 1. analysis would be necessary to distinguish Type 2 (Plate 2) between some of these pitchstone forms, but it is relatively easy to visually distinguish between Almost black with a green hue. pitchstone of Corriegills Type, which is aphyric, or A small number of relatively large inclusions (up non-porphyritic (i.e. it has no phenocrysts), and to 3 mm), which may be phenocrysts or larger the other three types, which are all porphyritic spherulites (porphyritic?). (i.e. they are characterised by one or the other form of phenocrysts). The Glen Cloy Type is Many elongated, parallel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analogues for Radioactive Waste For~1S •
    PNL-2776 UC-70 3 3679 00049 3611 ,. NATURALLY OCCURRING GLASSES: ANALOGUES FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE FOR~1S • Rodney C. Ewing Richard F. Haaker Department of Geology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, ~ew Mexico 87131 April 1979 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract EY-76-C-06-1830 Pacifi c i'lorthwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables. i i List of Figures iii Acknowledgements. Introduction. 3 Natural Glasses 5 Volcanic Glasses 9 Physical Properties 10 Compos i ti on . 10 Age Distributions 10 Alteration. 27 Devitrification 29 Hydration 32 Tekti tes. 37 Physical Properties 38 Composition . 38 Age Distributions . 38 Alteration, Hydration 44 and Devitrification Lunar Glasses 44 Summary . 49 Applications to Radioactive Waste Disposal. 51 Recommenda ti ons 59 References 61 Glossary 65 i LIST OF TABLES 1. Petrographic Properties of Natural Glasses 6 2. Average Densities of Natural Glasses 11 3. Density of Crystalline Rock and Corresponding Glass 11 4. Glass and Glassy Rocks: Compressibility 12 5. Glass and Glassy Rocks: Elastic Constants 13 6. Glass: Effect of Temperature on Elastic Constants 13 7. Strength of Hollow Cylinders of Glass Under External 14 Hydrostatic Pressure 8. Shearing Strength Under High Confining Pressure 14 9. Conductivity of Glass 15 10. Viscosity of Miscellaneous Glasses 16 11. Typical Compositions for Volcanic Glasses 18 12. Selected Physical Properties of Tektites 39 13. Elastic Constants 40 14. Average Composition of Tektites 41 15. K-Ar and Fission-Track Ages of Tektite Strewn Fields 42 16. Microprobe Analyses of Various Apollo 11 Glasses 46 17.
    [Show full text]
  • A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates by Keith R. Long Open-File Report 91-0579 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1991 Preface In recent years, almost all countries in Latin America have adopted democratic political systems and liberal economic policies. The resulting favorable investment climate has spurred a new wave of North American investment in Latin American mineral resources and has improved cooperation between geoscience organizations on both continents. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has responded to the new situation through cooperative mineral resource investigations with a number of countries in Latin America. These activities are now being coordinated by the USGS's Center for Inter-American Mineral Resource Investigations (CIMRI), recently established in Tucson, Arizona. In the course of CIMRI's work, we have found a need for a compilation of Spanish geological and mining terminology that goes beyond the few Spanish-English geological dictionaries available. Even geologists who are fluent in Spanish often encounter local terminology oijerga that is unfamiliar. These terms, which have grown out of five centuries of mining tradition in Latin America, and frequently draw on native languages, usually cannot be found in standard dictionaries. There are, of course, many geological terms which can be recognized even by geologists who speak little or no Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Geology and Mineralogy
    McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Geology and Mineralogy Second Edition McGraw-Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto All text in the dictionary was published previously in the McGRAW-HILL DICTIONARY OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL TERMS, Sixth Edition, copyright ᭧ 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGRAW-HILL DICTIONARY OF GEOLOGY AND MINERALOGY, Second Edi- tion, copyright ᭧ 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 1234567890 DOC/DOC 09876543 ISBN 0-07-141044-9 This book is printed on recycled, acid-free paper containing a mini- mum of 50% recycled, de-inked fiber. This book was set in Helvetica Bold and Novarese Book by the Clarinda Company, Clarinda, Iowa. It was printed and bound by RR Donnelley, The Lakeside Press. McGraw-Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premi- ums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please write to the Director of Special Sales, McGraw-Hill, Professional Publishing, Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2298. Or contact your local bookstore. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McGraw-Hill dictionary of geology and mineralogy — 2nd. ed. p. cm. “All text in this dictionary was published previously in the McGraw-Hill dictionary of scientific and technical terms, sixth edition, —T.p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape Fashioned by Geology
    Rum and the Small Isles : A landscape fashioned by geology The rugged, wild, mountainous landscape of Rum owes its creation to a geological history that stretches back nearly 3000 million years. For such a small island the range of scenery is remarkable - from the jagged peaks of Askival and Hallival in the east, to the rounded hills of Orval and Ard Nev in the west and the flatlands of Kinloch Glen. The spectacular panorama from Rum encompasses the sloping RUM AND THE backbone of Eigg, the rich green pasture of diminutive Muck and the carved basalt coastline embracing Canna and the low-lying Sanday. Held together by the sea, these islands combine a richness of landform, colour and texture with ever-changing light and dramatic weather. Find out how this mecca for geologists was formed over millions of years in this riveting tale of deserts and oceans, volcanoes and glaciers. R UM SMALL ISLES AND A LANDSCAPE FASHIONED BY GEOLOGY THE The silhouette of Rum is one of the most dramatic sights on Scotland’s west coast. Its diverse rocks and SMALL the landscapes they form have developed over billions of years as this part of the Earth’s crust moved across the planet. This guide beautifully illustrates the traces of ancient seas and rivers in the rocks ISLES and, more recently, Rum’s violent volcanic history as the North Atlantic rifted open. Finally ice scraped : and carved the land here as over all of Scotland. The perfect book to take along as you explore. A L Aubrey Manning, Author and Broadcaster ANDSC APE About the Authors F Kathryn Goodenough has worked as a field geologist in Scotland for over five years, first for Scottish Natural Heritage and now for ASHIONED the British Geological Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Arran Pitchstone (Scottish Volcanic Glass): New Dating Evidence Torben Bjarke Ballin
    Arran pitchstone (Scottish volcanic glass): New dating evidence Torben Bjarke Ballin 1. Lithic Research, Stirlingshire, UK. Email: [email protected]; 2. Honorary Research Fellow, University of Bradford, UK. Abstract: In the present paper, the author offers new absolute and contextual dating evidence for Scottish archaeological pitchstone. Much archaeological pitchstone from the Scottish mainland is recovered from unsealed contexts of multi-period or palimpsest sites, and pitchstone artefacts from radiocarbon- dated pits therefore provide important dating evidence for this material group and its associated exchange network. In Scotland, all archaeological pitchstone derives from outcrops on the Isle of Arran, in the Firth of Clyde, and on the source island pitchstone-bearing assemblages include diagnostic types from the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Early Bronze Age period. Off Arran, pitchstone- bearing assemblages never include Mesolithic types, such as microliths, suggesting a post Mesolithic date. This suggestion is supported by worked pitchstone from radiocarbon-dated pits, where all presently available dates indicate that, on the Scottish mainland, Arran pitchstone was traded and used after the Mesolithic period, and in particular during the Early Neolithic period. Keywords: pitchstone, volcanic glass, Neolithic, radiocarbon dating, contextual dating, pits, prehistoric exchange 1. Introduction In 2009, the author concluded the project Archaeological Pitchstone in Northern Britain with the publication of a monograph in which he discussed various issues relating to this topic (Ballin 2009a). The main reason for undertaking the project was the fact that the number of artefacts in this raw material, as well as the number of pitchstone-bearing sites, had multiplied exponentially. When Williams Thorpe & Thorpe (1984) published their important paper on the topic, only approximately 1,400 pieces of worked pitchstone were known, from c.
    [Show full text]
  • IAOS Bulletin No. 45, Summer 2011 Pg
    IAOS International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin Number 45 Summer 2011 CONTENTS International Association for Obsidian Studies News and Information ………………………… 1 President Tristan Carter Notes from the President ……………….………. 2 President-Elect Ellery Frahm News and Notes…………...……………………. 4 Secretary-Treasurer Kyle Freund Scottish Archaeological Pitchstone Project….…. 8 Bulletin Editor Carolyn Dillian Origins of Obsidian Tools from Kul Tepe, Iran.... 14 Webmaster Craig Skinner Flow-Specific Hydration Rates….………...……..18 Instructions for Authors …..…………………… 26 Web Site: http://members.peak.org/~obsidian/ About the IAOS………………………………… 27 Membership Application ……………………….. 28 NEWS AND INFORMATION CONSIDER PUBLISHING IN THE IAOS Election Results IAOS BULLETIN The results of our recent election are in! The Bulletin is a twice-yearly publication that Dr. Ellery Frahm, University of Minnesota, reaches a wide audience in the obsidian community. is our new President-Elect, and Kyle Please review your research notes and consider Freund of McMaster University has submitting an article, research update, news, or lab already begun his duties as the new IAOS report for publication in the IAOS Bulletin. Articles Secretary-Treasurer. and inquiries can be sent to [email protected] Thank you for your help and support! IAOS Student Paper Awards The IAOS is pleased to announce the recipients of 2011 student paper/poster awards granted for papers presented at the 2011 Society for American Archaeology annual meeting. The winners are: Lucas Martindale Johnson (University of Florida), Scott Bigney (California State University, Dominguez Hills), and Allison Barden (University of California, Berkeley). Congratulations to our award recipients. Winners receive free membership to the IAOS and are invited to publish their papers in the IAOS Bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Arran Pitchstone ('Scottish Obsidian') – New
    THE NEWSLETTERAST OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY P Registered Office: University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ Arran pitchstone (‘Scottish obsidian’) – new dating evidence Introduction about, confirming a Late Neolithic phase of pitchstone use In 2009, I concluded the project ‘Archaeological Pitchstone and exchange along the western seaboard of Scotland and in Northern Britain’ with the publication of a monograph extending as far north as Orkney. This appears to be part of in which I discussed various issues relating to this topic. The a reciprocal movement of ideas, objects and people at that main reason for undertaking the project was that the number time – the use of Grooved Ware and timber/stone circles of artefacts in this raw material, as well as the number of spreading south-westwards down the Atlantic façade and, pitchstone-bearing sites, had multiplied exponentially. When among other things, pitchstone northwards along the same Williams Thorpe and Thorpe published their important route. This new evidence generally relates to the recovery of paper on the topic in 1984, only approximately 1,400 pieces pitchstone from pits which have associated absolute dates, as of worked pitchstone were known from c.100 find locations, well as indirectly dating the pitchstone through association but in 2009 approximately 20,300 pieces had been recorded with prehistoric pottery. from c.350 sites. Alongside the procurement of pitchstone on the Isle of Arran west of Glasgow and the manufacture, use, and deposition of pitchstone artefacts throughouth northern Britain, one of the most interesting questions relating to prehistoric pitchstone use is the exchange of this raw material and artefacts made from it, and what this tells us about the territorial structure of a tribal society.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Some Oregon Rocks and Minerals
    A DDESCRIPTIONESCRIPTION OF SSOMEOME OOREGONREGON RROCKSOCKS ANDAND MMINERALSINERALS Lfr ° e .` T*3 . t- ' a - + le . .,r > Mk, 9a .e.a, -f $5.50 4-H4 -H 3401L Reprinted August 2006 so Extension Oregon State I OOREGONREGON DDEPARTMENTEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGYGEOLOGY AANDND MMINERALINERAL IINDUSTRIESNDUSTRIES UNIVERSITY Service CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................1 ROCK DESCRIPTIONS GENERAL Igneous rocks Minerals defined ............................................... 1 Introduction .................................................. 29 Extrusive igneous rocks: flow rocks (lavas) Rocks defined .................................................... 2 Basalt ...................................................... 29 MINERALS Andesite ................................................... 30 Classification ..................................................... 3 Rhyolite .................................................... 30 Identification ..................................................... 3 Obsidian................................................... 30 Extrusive igneous rocks: pyroclastic rocks ROCKS Pumice .................................................... 31 Igneous rocks ................................................... 4 Cinders .................................................... 32 Sedimentary rocks .......................................... 6 Tuff .......................................................... 32 Metamorphic rocks ........................................ 8 Intrusive igneous
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Palynological Studies at the Mesolithic Pitchstone
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 118 (1988), 37-59 Archaeological and palynological studies at the Mesolithic pitchston flind an et sit Auchareochf eo , Isl Arraf eo n late eTh Thoma Affleck*sL , Kevin Edwardsd an t Ann Clarke$ SUMMARY The results of an archaeological and environmental (mainly palynological) investigation of a site of Mesolithic presented.are inlandage The kame terrace site of Auchareoch Islethe ofon Arranhas produced some preserved features with over 4400 pitchstoneflintand finds, carbonizedand hazel-nut shells. The extent and character of the occupation area are assessed and shown to be extensive (300- 400m2). The environmental data demonstrate the limitations imposed by soil pollen and charcoal studies, suggestbut that area experiencedthe has possible hunter-gathering agriculturaland impacts, prior to soil deterioration and peat growth. An attempt is made to place the site in the wider context of the Mesolithic northernof Britain. INTRODUCTION Research shows that the south-west of Scotland was the location for widespread Mesolithic occupation (illu . Apars1) t fro lone mth g known coastal locatio possiblf no e settlement (Morrison 1980a; 1982) there was also an extensive inland presence of hunter-gatherer communities (Edwards et al 1983). The relatively large size of the Isle of Arran (c 32 x 17 km) might be expected to have yielded signMesolithia f so c presence. Apart fro earle mth y reference f Lacaillo s e (1954 unspecifieo t ) d localities producing artefacts, which were compared with the late Larnian of north-east Ireland, nothing had come to light until recently. In 1981 Fairhurst reported finds of microliths at Knockenkell Auchareochd yan additionn I .
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Arran Pitchstone As Perceived at Biggar Museums in 2000. an Account of a Seminar Held There by Local Archaeologists
    The world of Arran pitchstone as perceived at Biggar Museums in 2000. An account of a seminar held there by local archaeologists. Tam Ward 2017©. Daer Main Report PAGE 1 Account of a seminar on Pitchstone held at Biggar Museum in 2000. Tam Ward. 2017 Introduction The following paper is an account of a seminar held at Biggar Museum in the year 2000, about archaeological pitchstone, it has never been published and indeed it was not meant to be, only the participants received a copy of the proceedings. The proposed ‘follow ups’ to the seminar never took place, due at least in BAG’s case, to the pressure of their project work, and the fact that eventually contact was made with Torben Bjarke Ballin who did what we wanted to have done, a professional study on the subject matter of our collections of pitchstone, and to which we are extremely grateful. Firstly, Torben produced a paper which is published on BAG website (Ballin & Ward 2008) and dealt with the collections made by BAG to that date. Torben then went on to publish two other papers on pitchstone; one in association with John Faithfull (Ballin T B 2009 & Ballin T B &, Faithfull J, 2009). Therefore, the work of BAG relative to pitchstone was brought up to date in 2008 and the subject matter was further published academically by 2009. The aims and objectives of the seminar at Biggar in 2000 are set out throughout the following paper on the day, and the principal aim of this introduction and the now published account of the seminar are merely to put on record that BAG was the first to publicly promote a fuller study of Arran pitchstone since the pioneering work of Thorpe and Thorpe in 1984 (ref below).
    [Show full text]