Peregrine Falcon Investigations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peregrine Falcon Investigations PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION BUREAU OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL JOB REPORT PROJECT CODE NO.: 06715 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Research/Management JOB CODE NO.: 71501 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Investigations PERIOD COVERED: 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 COOPERATING AGENCIES: The Aark Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Newtown; Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia; Carbon County Environmental Education Center; Comcast Center, Philadelphia; Dauphin County Wildlife Rescue, Harrisburg; Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, New Hope; Delaware River Port Authority; Delaware Valley Raptor Center, Milford; Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area; Gulf Tower, Pittsburgh; Make a Wish Foundation, Pittsburgh; The National Aviary, Pittsburgh; New Jersey Division of Fish, Game, and Wildlife; Packer Ave. Marine Terminal, Philadelphia; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission; Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission; Philadelphia City Hall; Philadelphia Zoo; PPL Corporation; Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education - Wildlife Division, Philadelphia; Three Rivers Avian Center, Brooks, West Virginia; Tri-State Bird Rescue & Research, Newark, Delaware; University of Pittsburgh; US Army Corps of Engineers; US Fish & Wildlife Service; Webbed Foot Wildlife Rehabilitation Clinic, Ambler; Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh. WORK LOCATION(S): Statewide PREPARED BY: F. Arthur McMorris and Daniel W. Brauning DATE: 13 August 2010 ABSTRACT The long-term management goal of this project is to re-establish a self-sustaining peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) population in Pennsylvania (Brauning and Hassinger, 2001). Peregrine falcon coordinator Dr. Art McMorris and over 60 volunteers monitored peregrine falcons at 44 sites and searched for falcons at additional locations across the state. One new nest was identified in 2009, and 2 nests were active after several years of inactivity, raising the total number of active nests to 25. The total number of nest sites occupied by pairs throughout the nesting season (25) and the number of young fledged (68) were the highest since the beginning of the peregrine falcon recovery program, and the number of successful nests (21) tied a high set in 2008. Fifty-six of the 68 young were banded at the nest. The number of active nests at natural cliff sites increased from 3 to 5, and 3 of the 5 were successful, fledging 9 young. Twenty-three band recoveries were obtained 71501 2 during the calendar year 2009. The public was invited to attend peregrine falcon banding events at the Rachel Carson State Office Building (RCSOB) in Harrisburg, the Gulf Tower and the University of Pittsburgh Cathedral of Learning in Pittsburgh, and City Hall in Philadelphia. Activities of Pennsylvania’s peregrine falcons attracted much favorable attention from the public and were well covered in the media. There were 23 recoveries of falcons banded in Pennsylvania, or banded elsewhere and recovered in Pennsylvania, during the 2009 calendar year. OBJECTIVES 1. The long-term management goal is to re-establish a self-sustaining peregrine falcon population in Pennsylvania. 2. The recovery levels proposed to upgrade the peregrine falcon’s state status from endangered to threatened, outlined in the revised Pennsylvania Recovery and Management Plan for the peregrine falcon (Brauning, 2007), are a self-sustaining total of 15 breeding pairs (33% of the historic population), productivity of at least 1.25 young fledged per pair, and at least half of known pairs nesting successfully, each for 3 years. State de-listing is proposed to occur only after the establishment of self-sustaining population of a total 22 pairs on natural (cliff) sites statewide (50% of the historic total) for 3 years, and reproductive success on those cliffs must exceed 2.0 birds per active nest and on buildings/bridges exceed 1.5 birds per active site to assure a stable population. METHODS Peregrine falcon coordinator Dr. Art McMorris monitored peregrine falcon nesting activity in southeastern Pennsylvania during the 2009 nesting season and coordinated over 60 volunteers and agency personnel in monitoring over 40 nests and potential nest sites across the state (Fig. 1). Video cameras, linked to live Internet connections, again monitored the nest site at the Rachel Carson State Office Building (RCSOB) in Harrisburg (Department of Environmental Protection [DEP] 2009), and the Gulf Tower and the University of Pittsburgh Cathedral of Learning in Pittsburgh (National Aviary 2009). Young falcons at nests within driving distance of Philadelphia were banded by Art McMorris; those in the Pittsburgh area were banded by other Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) personnel as noted below. CHANGE IN REPORTING PERIOD Beginning with this Annual Report, the reporting is being changed from a fiscal year to a calendar year basis. The previous Annual Report, for 2008, contained the results of the 2008 nesting season and covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 for all data except for recoveries, which were reported for the period 1 July to 31 December 2008. To bring about the transition with no gaps in coverage, the present Annual Report, for 2009, contains the results of the 2009 nesting season, recoveries for 1 January to 31 December 2009, and all other data for 1 July to 31 December 2009. Future annual reports will cover the calendar year from 1 January to 31 December for all data each year. RESULTS 71501 3 Peregrine falcons nested at 25 sites in Pennsylvania during 2009. Young fledged successfully at 21 of the 25 sites, for a success rate of 84%. Three new nests were established, or were active after a period of inactivity, in 2009. A new nesting pair was found at the Norman Wood Bridge (Pennsylvania Route 372 and Susquehanna River, Lancaster County), but the nest was not successful. The nest at Philadelphia City Hall was active for the first time since 2000, and fledged 4 young. Nesting activity was documented at the Delaware Water Gap for the first time in 5 years, but the nest failed, almost certainly due to disturbance. At one nest site, the Walt Whitman Bridge in Philadelphia, the falcons nested on the New Jersey rather than the Pennsylvania side of the state line, for a loss of one Pennsylvania nest. The net change was an increase in 2 active nests in 2009 as compared with 2008 (Table 1). The total number of active nests (25) and the number of young produced (68) and banded (56) were the highest since the beginning of the peregrine falcon recovery program. Nests in Philadelphia Area, Southeast (SE) Region Six Delaware River bridges, 2 Schuylkill River bridges and several tall buildings in the Philadelphia area were monitored for peregrine falcon activity. Nesting activity was observed at 6 sites and success was confirmed at all 6, with a total of 19 young. More than half of the Commonwealth’s active peregrine falcon nests are in the SE Region, and nearly half of those are in the Philadelphia area. Results for the Philadelphia-area nests are detailed in Tables 1, 2, 4 and 7 and are summarized are as follows: Benjamin Franklin Bridge, Philadelphia County.--This nest was again monitored by volunteers Georgia and Barrie Ashby and several others. Three young were produced in this nest and were banded by PGC personnel on 1 June. All 3 fledged successfully and continued to be observed until late summer. Commodore Barry Bridge, Delaware County.--Two hatchlings and one egg were found when this nest was visited on 15 June, but when the nest was re-visited for banding on 1 July, only 1 nestling was found, together with one unhatched egg. The nestling was banded on 1 July and fledged successfully, but on 23 July it was found dead on the bridge roadway. Girard Point Bridge, Philadelphia County.--Nesting activity has been documented at this site every year since 1987, and young fledged from the site 3 times during the first few years of activity and then every year since 1996. In 2009, 4 young were produced; they were banded on 14 May, fledged successfully, and continued to be observed through the summer. Pennsylvania-New Jersey Turnpike Connector Bridge, Bucks County.--This nest continues to be monitored by several dedicated volunteers led by Linda Rowan. The pair nested in the same box beam that they have used continuously since 2001, and produced 4 young which were banded 21 May. All fledged successfully, but one was found dead on the roadway near the nest site on 6 June. The 3 survivors continued to be observed for 8 weeks after fledging. Philadelphia, Downtown, Philadelphia County.--Downtown Philadelphia and vicinity were monitored with the assistance of long-term volunteer Ed Mutzer. Peregrine Falcons nested in the nest 71501 4 box on City Hall Tower for the first time since 2000. Four young were produced, and all fledged successfully. The young were banded by PGC personnel on 28 May in an event that was attended by the public and well covered by local newspapers and TV stations. All four fledged successfully. 2400 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, Philadelphia County.--A nest box was placed on the rooftop by building management in cooperation with PGC in April 2008. Although the location has many features which would be expected to make it attractive as a peregrine falcon nest site, there has been no evidence to date that falcons have used the box. Walt Whitman Bridge, Philadelphia County.--This tall suspension bridge has a nest box mounted on top of each tower, one in Pennsylvania (PA) and the other in New Jersey (NJ). The falcons frequently move their nest back and forth across the river. In 2009 the falcons used the nest box on top of the east (NJ) tower and produced 2 young. This result is noted in Table 1 but the data are not included in the PA totals. Other nests in the SE Region In addition to the 6 active and 1 inactive nests in the Philadelphia area described above, there are 9 more active nests in other locations in the SE region.
Recommended publications
  • Three Rivers Water Trail Access • Row Boats Or Sculls Points Are Available for Public Use
    WHAT IS A WATER TRAIL? Is kayaking strenuous? Water trails are recreational waterways on lakes, rivers or Kayaking can be a great workout, or a relaxing day spent oceans between specific points, containing access points floating or casually paddling on the river. and day-use and camping sites (where appropriate) for the boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and What should I wear? promote resource stewardship. Explore this unique Pennsylvania water trail. Whatever you’re comfortable in! You should not expect to get excessively wet, but non-cotton materials that dry quickly are Three Rivers WHAT TYPES OF PADDLE-CRAFT? best. Consider dressing in layers, and wear shoes that will stay on your feet. • Kayaks • Canoes How do I use the storage racks? • Paddle boards Water Trail The storage racks at many Three Rivers Water Trail access • Row boats or sculls points are available for public use. These are not intended for long term storage. Store “at your own risk.” Using a lock you FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: are comfortable with is recommended. Is it safe for beginners to paddle on the river? Flat-water kayaking, canoeing, or paddle boarding is perfect for beginners. It is easy to learn with just a Map & Guide few minutes of instruction. RUL THREE RIVERS E S & Friends of the Riverfront, founded in 1991, is WATER TRAIL dedicated to the development and stewardship of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail and Three R Developed by Friends of the Riverfront Rivers Water Trail in the Pittsburgh region. This EG PENNSYLVANIA BOATING REGULATIONS guide is provided so that everyone can enjoy the natural amenities that makes the Pittsburgh • A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Operations Task Force Meeting Highlights
    TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS TASK FORCE MEETING HIGHLIGHTS March 18, 2013 1. Welcome and Introductions Bill Ragozine, Cross County Connection TMA (CCCTMA), welcomed members and thanked them for attending. 2. New Transportation Operation Task Force Chairperson It was announced that Lou Belmonte, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), will become the new Chair of the Transportation Operations Task Force (TOTF) beginning next meeting. Ek Phomsavath, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has accepted the role of Vice-Chair. Bill Ragozine was presented a certificate of appreciation and thanked for all of his hard work and effort for the past several years. 3. Two Minute Agency Reports Each person in attendance introduced themselves and added any relevant ITS and operations updates from their agency. Some of the highlights include: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation: PennDOT will be initiating three additional Emergency Service Patrol routes operating in the AM and PM peak periods along the US 30 Bypass, US 422, and PA 309. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC): The PTC has initiated a statewide CCTV project to put cameras at each of their interchanges. Another project will be installing 15 Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) between Reading and Willow Grove interchanges. Cross County Connection TMA: The CCTMA has developed a new smart phone app that allows users to check real-time traffic conditions and view live traffic cameras at intersections known for congestion in South Jersey. For more information, go to www.njintersections.com. DVRPC: RIMIS is currently installed at over 70 entities in the region. Since the last TOTF meeting, DVRPC has started coordinating with Haverford and Lower Merion Police Departments to use RIMIS during the USGA Open Golf Championship this June.
    [Show full text]
  • Penndot District 11
    PennDOT District 11 North Allegheny County Community Outreach April 12, 2019 Agenda • Budget Update & District Overview • Customer Service & Roadside Beautification • 2019 County Maintenance Activities • Traffic Engineering & Operations Unit • 2019 Construction Projects • 2019-2021 Projects in Design & P3 Bridges Update • PennDOT Connects • Liquid Fuels Distributions District 11-0 Engineering Office Cheryl Moon-Sirianni, P.E. District Executive 412-429-5001 District 11 PennDOT District 11-0 Allegheny Beaver Lawrence Totals Miles of Roadway 1,484 668 417 2,569 Bridges 1,182 338 277 1,797 Tunnels 4 0 0 4 Stockpiles 16 9 6 31 Snow Lane Miles 3668 1,436 911 6,015 Winter Agreements Miles 1533 172 109 1,814 PennDOT District 11-0 Budget • Budget $518 Million (SFY 18-19) – $211 Million State funds – $307 Million Federal funds • Budget Breakdown – $132 Million Maintenance – $27 Million Maintenance (Expanded) – $242 Million Capital Highway – $75 Million Capital Bridge – $42 Million Local Allegheny County Maintenance - $53 Million Tunnel Organization Maintenance - $7.6 Million District Office Maintenance - $7.4 Million Our Strategic Themes • Open, Proactive Communications • Sustainable Policy-Based Investments & Infrastructure Investments • Safety at all levels • Innovative, Smart and Diverse Organization • Effective Partnerships 2018 In Review • 176 projects for construction payouts totaling $319.8M • Let a total of 8 Group Projects in 2018: 5 in Allegheny County (including 1 Longitudinal Joint Repair), 1 in Beaver County, and 2 in Lawrence County
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (Bulk 1946-1965)
    Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 1 Allegheny Conference On Community Development (Pittsburgh, Pa), Photographs, 1892- 1981 (bulk 1946-1965) Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania Archives MSP# 285 30 boxes (Boxes 1-22 Prints, Boxes 23-28 Negatives, Box 28 Transparencies, Boxes 29-30 Oversized Prints) Table of Content: Historical Note page 1 Scope and Content Note page 2 Series I: Prints page 2 Sub-series: Aviation page 3 Sub-series: Buildings page 3 Sub-series: Culture page 3 Sub-series: Education page 3 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 4 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 4 Sub-series: Highways page 4 Sub-series: Historical page 4 Sub-series: Housing page 4 Sub-series: Miscellaneous page 5 Sub-series: PA Pitt Partner’s Program page 5 Sub-series: Personnel page 5 Sub-series: Publications page 5 Sub-series: Recreation page 6 Sub-series: Research page 6 Sub-series: Smoke Control page 6 Sub-series: Stadiums page 6 Sub-series: Transportation page 6 Sub-series: Urban Redevelopment page 7 Series II: Negatives page 7 Sub-Series: Glass Plate Negatives page 7 Series III: Transparencies page 7 Series IV: Oversized Prints & Negatives page 7 Provenance page 8 Restrictions and Separations page 8 Catalog Entries page 8 Container List page 10 Series I: Prints page 10 Sub-series: Aviation page 10 Sub-series: Buildings page 10 Sub-series: Culture page 14 Allegheny Conference On Community Development Page 2 Sub-series: Education page 16 Sub-series: Golden Triangle page 20 Sub-series: Health & Welfare page 22 Sub-series: Highways page
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering
    June 2011 REDISCOVERING... Community Connections Competitiveness Char-West Multi-Municipal Comprehensive Plan McKees Rocks Borough, Neville Township and Stowe Township TABLE OF CONTENTS | Acknowledgements .............................................. v Foreword ............................................................. xi Part 1: Overview .................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................... 3 Planning Approach and Process ................... 5 Public Participation ........................................ 7 Part 2: Foundations ............................................. 9 Opportunities and Challenges ..................... 11 Other Considerations .................................. 15 Part 3: Vision ..................................................... 19 Introduction ................................................. 21 Goals ........................................................... 21 Objectives ................................................... 22 Places to Grow ............................................ 22 Recommendations ...................................... 23 Future Land Use and Housing Plan ......... 24 Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy Plan ......................................................... 37 Business, Community and Economic Development Plan ................................... 61 Environment and Culture Plan ................. 85 Civic Amenities Plan ................................ 93 Places to Grow .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parking & Access
    Your Travel Game Plan A R R I V E A R R I V E ARRIVE Heinz Field HRS. HRS. 2EARLY EARLY EARLY PARKING & ACCESS Want to get the most out of your game day? Are you looking for cash Here are a few questions to get you started. parking on game day? Consider one of the many less expensive and convenient garages and lots downtown and in Station Square. If you are paying for parking upon arrival, please ARRIVE consider your direction of travel following the game. Looking for the best Choosing a parking lot or garage close to your game day experience? exiting route will cut down on travel time. EARLY Arrive 2 hours early and join the excitement PAGE 6 with other fans. There are plenty of activities, live music and food preceding the game. PAGE 3 Why not take the Light Rail or a water shuttle to the game? Taking the Light Rail or a water shuttle to Do you have Heinz Field is a convenient and fun way to a Pre-Sold access the North Shore. LOT 1 parking pass? PAGE 8 If you want to buy Pre-Sold parking or you already have a parking pass for a Pre-Sold parking lot or garage, take a look at the map to ensure you take the Are you looking for an quickest route. alternate route home? For Lot-Specific Directions, visit If you don’t want to wait in post game HeinzField.com/Stadium/Directions traffic, try an alternate route home. PAGE 4 PAGE 11 1 Heinz Field and Waze have partnered up to give you the best directions—directly to your parking spot! Want Live Traffic and Parking Notifications? A R R I V E A R R I V E RRIVE Download the Official Steel- A ers App and sign up for the HRgameday/stadiumS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2024 TIP Amendment Click Here to Download
    MTA Market Place District Improvements County: Allegheny Municipality: Moon Township Location: Montour Run Road / Market Place Blvd Improvement: Roadway and intersection improvements including pedestrian and bike connections. Project Sponsor: Moon Transportation Authority Project Cost and Schedule: $738,000 in 2021-2022; $590,000 in 2023; $4,264,000 in 2024. Total Cost in 2021-2024 TIP: $5,592,000. Preliminary engineering ongoing/beginning in February 2021. Project Description: Roadway improvements on Montour Run Road and Market Place Blvd. will support development of a 780-acre site in Moon Twp., Allegheny County. The improvements include roadway widening, adding turn lanes, implementing pedestrian and bike connections and intersection improvements on Montour Run Road, and upgrading Market Place Blvd. This project is separate from the I-376 Frontage Road and Improvements. It is fully funded through a public-private partnership using Local/MTA and private funding. This is Phase 1 of a $17 million multiphase infrastructure program. SPC Long Range Transportation Plan Fiscally Constrained Highway/Bridge Project List Investment MPMS/ County Title Estimated Cost Route Stage Narrative Category GIS ID Multi‐County US 18 Corridor $57,590,000 18 Regional Corridor (Detailed in Corridor Section) Multi‐County US 19 Corridor $137,930,500 19 Regional Corridor (Detailed in Corridor Section) Multi‐County US 22 Corridor $112,333,000 22 Regional Corridor (Detailed in Corridor Section) Multi‐County SR 28 Corridor $354,852,000 28 Regional Corridor (Detailed
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority of Allegheny County: System
    PENN SALT The P10 Route continues to Evergreen Road MANUFACTURING ALLEGHENY VALLEY HOSPITAL HEIGHTS PLAZA Freeport 79 P10 BRACKENRIDGE ALLEGHENY Penn AMBRIDGE BUTLER COUNTY TARENTUM LUDLUM STEEL 10th NORTH PARK 9th 14 11th AMBRIDGE-ALLIQUIPA BRIDGE 6th AMBRIDGE PARK & RIDE Corbet P TARENTUM PARK & RIDE Merchant 1 7thCenter P 12-O12 EAST DEER Ross 1st 4th PINE CREEK SHOPPING CENTER RAVE CINEMA PARK & RIDE PORT P GEORGE STUART BRIDGE AMBRIDGE Presidential INDUSTRIAL O5 McKnight NORTH PARK POOL PARK & RIDE 76 1 PARK P Hemlock Beaver HAMPTON P10 McCANDLESS 14 O12 12 O5 O5 ARNOLD Northgate 12 UPMC PASSAVANT HOSPITAL Sample Freeport Cumberland LA ROCHE COLLEGE LEETSDALE P13 INDUSTRIAL PARK 65 McKnight Duncan HARTWOOD ACRES PARK PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE NEW KENSINGTON BRIDGE CRESCENT LEETSDALE EDGEWORTH Remington Ferguson Babcock 9th BEAVER COUNTY Beaver 14 12-O12 Peebles2 O5 2 P13 HARWICK 1 P10 1 NEW KENSINGTON 7th 4th Perimeter McINTYRE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER ALLEGHENY COUNTY SEWICKLEY 12 McIntyre ROSS Hyte Hill ALLISON PARK Bank Locust P10 21 HERITAGE VALLEY SEWICKLEY HOSPITAL KANE CENTER NORTHWAY MALL 12-P13 76 SPRINGDALE TOWNSHIP 28 Pillow WESTMORELAND COUNTY Broad 2-12 - P VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 2 12 PARK AND RIDE Walnut ROSS PARK MALL WESTINGHOUSE 79 279 RESEARCH LABS 60 SEWICKLEY BRIDGE OSBORNE P13 2 P13 HARMAR CHESWICK McKnight Thompson Run 78-P16-P78 P10 SPRINGDALE Beaver Royal Mt. HARMARVILLE ALLEGHENY COUNTY 14 Alpha 1 Freeport 21 ALLEGHENY VALLEY EXPRESSWAY Ohio River Blvd Freeport GLENSHAW THORN RUN PARK & RIDE P 4th 14 GLENFIELD KILBUCK Perry Hwy. NORTH HILLS VILLAGE MALL 2 12-O12 O5 SHALER 2 P13 P10 1 78-P16-P78 P16 21 HULTON NEVILLE ISLAND Center BRIDGE 65 P GLENFIELD PARK & RIDE Hulton BRIDGE 13 McKnight 21 Grand 28 5th EMSWORTH Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrine Falcon Research/Management
    PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION BUREAU OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL JOB REPORT PROJECT CODE NO.: 06715 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Research/Management JOB CODE NO.: 71501 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Investigations PERIOD COVERED: 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 COOPERATING AGENCIES: The Aark Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Chalfont; Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; Pennsylvania American Water Company, Hershey; Carbon County Environmental Education Center, Summit Hill; Comcast Center, Philadelphia; Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, Phillipsburg, New Jersey; Delaware River Port Authority; Delaware Valley Raptor Center, Milford; Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area; Gulf Tower, Pittsburgh; Make a Wish Foundation, Pittsburgh; The National Aviary, Pittsburgh; New Jersey Division of Fish, Game, and Wildlife; Packer Ave. Marine Terminal, Philadelphia; Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission; Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission; Philadelphia City Hall; Philadelphia Zoo; Pocono Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Stroudsburg; PPL Corporation; Red Creek Wildlife Center, Schuylkill Haven; Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Philadelphia; Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education - Wildlife Division, Philadelphia; Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL; Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research, Newark, Delaware; University of Pittsburgh; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh. WORK LOCATIONS: Statewide PREPARED BY: F. Arthur McMorris, Patricia Barber and Daniel W. Brauning DATE: 12 March 2014 ABSTRACT The long-term management goal of this project is to re-establish a self-sustaining peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) population in Pennsylvania (Brauning and Hassinger 2001; Brauning et al. 2013). Monitoring of peregrine falcon nesting activity was coordinated by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–96 Edition)
    § 81.339 40 CFR Ch. I (7±1±96 Edition) PennsylvaniaÐTSP Does not Does not Better than Designated area meet primary meet second- Cannot be national standards ary standards classified standards Luzerne County: City of Wilkes-Barre .............. ...................... ...................... ...................... X (B) A±B±E Air Basin: Lehigh County: Coplay Boro ........................................ X ...................... ...................... ...................... Whitehall Township ............................ X ...................... ...................... ...................... Northampton County: Northampton Boro .............................. X ...................... ...................... ...................... Allen Township ................................... X ...................... ...................... ...................... (C) Reading Air Basin ..................................................... ...................... ...................... ...................... X (D) Carbon County .......................................................... ...................... ...................... ...................... X (E) Remaining Portions of AQCR ................................... ...................... ...................... ...................... X III. South Central Pennsylvania Intrastate AQCR: (A) Harrisburg Air Basin .................................................. ...................... ...................... ...................... X (B) Lancaster Air Basin: Lancaster County: City of Lancaster ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION PLAN N OVERVIEW of the for Each Mode Covered in the Plan, You Will Find Today’S Conditions, Issues and Analysis, and Recommendations
    ALLEGHENY PLACES THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Transportation Element Update April 2014 Allegheny County, Pennsylvania CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION PLAN n OVERVIEW OF THE For each mode covered in the Plan, you will find Today’s Conditions, Issues and Analysis, and Recommendations. n TRANSPORTATION PLAN According to Bridges and Tunnels of Allegheny County RELATIONSHIP TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN (www.pghbridges.com), geology has exerted a strong influence on the development of transportation in Allegheny The purpose of the Transportation Plan is to maximize County. The County is located on the Allegheny Plateau. utilization of the existing transportation network, target new Our three rivers, together with their many tributaries, formed investment in the system for maximum return and provide all bluffs and steep slopes as they cut their way through layers people equal access to growth opportunities, especially those of rock for millions of years. Long ago, Native Americans associated with ‘Places’ designated on the Future Land Use traveled on trails through the area, often following the tops Plan (see Map 4A.1). of the ridges to avoid river and stream crossings. The Future Land Use Plan focuses development in designated Today, Pittsburgh and its suburbs are known for steep ‘Places’. Most ‘Places’ are along existing transportation hillsides and streets requiring steps for sidewalks. Other corridors and all are highly accessible to each other, as metropolitan locations may have similar topography, but well as to the region. One of the key benefits of concentrating generally they are not as heavily urbanized as Allegheny development, investment and activities in ‘Places’ is that County.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) § 81.339
    § 81.339 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) § 81.339 Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania—TSP Does not Does not meet sec- Cannot be Better than Designated area meet primary ondary stand- classified national standards ards standards I. Metropolitan Philadelphia Interstate AQCR: (A) City of Philadelphia: Census tracts 1–12, 125–142, 144–157, 162– 177, 190–205, 293, 294, 298–302, 315– 321, 323, 325, 326, 329–332 ....................... ...................... X Census tracts 13–75, 143, 158–161, 178–189, 295–297, 322, 324, 327 ............................... ...................... ...................... X Balance of city .................................................. ...................... ...................... ...................... X (B) Montgomery County: Conshohocken Boro ......................................... ...................... ...................... ...................... X Pottstown Boro ................................................. ...................... X West Pottsgrove Township ............................... ...................... ...................... X Upper Pottsgrove Township ............................. ...................... ...................... X (C) Chester County: South Coatesville Boro ..................................... ...................... X City of Coatesville ............................................. ...................... ...................... X (D) Bucks County: Doylestown Township ...................... ...................... ...................... X (E) Remaining Pennsylvania Portions of AQCR ...........
    [Show full text]