DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Year Review Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five Year Review Report SDMS DocID 2088134 FIVE YEAR RE VIEW FOR GIRARD POINT MANAGEMENT AREA AT PHILADELPHIA NAVAL BUSINESS CENTER PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) COMPREHENSIVE LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NAVY (CLEAN) H CONTRACT CONTRACT NUMBER N62467-92-D-1296 CONTRACT TASK ORDER 0081 Prepared for: Department of the Navy Engineering Field Activity North East Environmental Branch Code EV2 Naval Facilities Engineering Command 10 Industrial Highway, Mail Stop #82 Lester, Pennsylvania 19113-2090 APPRO Captain Robe^B. Date Commanding Officer EFANE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENGINEERING FIELD ACTIVITY, NORTHEAST NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND 10 INDUSTRIAL HIGHWAY MAIL STOP, #82 LESTER, PA 19113-2090 IN REPLY REFER TO 5090 EV21/MD June 21, 2004 Mr. Harry Harbold 3H550 Hazardous Site Cleanup Division EPA Region III Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Harbold: SUBJECT: FINAL FIVE YEAR REVIEW FOR GIRARD POINT DRIVE; JULY 15, 2003, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL BUSINESS CENTER, PHILADELPHIA, PA A copy of the subject report is submitted for your records. The Navy will now proceed with implementing the remaining recommendations as listed in this report. If you should need additional information or have any questions please contact Michele DiGeambeardino at 610-595-0567 extension 117. Sincerely, MICHELE DIGEAMBEARDINO Remedial Project Manager By direction of the Commanding Officer FIVE YEAR REVIEW FOR GIRARD POINT MANAGEMENT AREA AT PHILADELPHIA NAVAL BUSINESS CENTER PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA Preparedfor: Department of the Navy EFA North East Naval Facilities Engineering Command 10 Industrial Highway Mail Stop No. 82 Lester, Pennsylvania 19113-2090 Prepared by: Stone & Webster, Inc., A Shaw Group Company 3 Executive Campus Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 (856) 482-3000 Under contract with: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology 11019McCormickRoad Hunt Valley, Maryland 21031 (410)584-7000 Contract No. N62472-92-D-1296 Contract Task Order No. 0081 November 2003 FINAL EA Project No. 296.0081 Shaw Project No. 04291.18.50 FIVE YEAR REVIEW FOR GIRARD POINT MANAGEMENT AREA AT PHILADELPHIA NAVAL BUSINESS CENTER PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA Contract No. N62472-92-D-1296 Contract Task Order No. 0081 Dtte ".:.'.:.'" 0*e Program rnsoigcr .. • Novnuber2003 FINAL EAPngcct No. 296.0081 Shaw Project No. 04291.1830 Project J.O. 04291.18.50 Table of Contents Revision: Final Pageiv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND SITE BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Site Background 1 1.3 Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments 2 2.0 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES 4 2.1 Long Term Ground-Water Monitoring Program 5 3.0 FIVE-YEAR RE VIEW 8 3.1 Site Inspection and Photo-documentation 8 3.2 Bank Stabilization 8 3.3 Permeable and Vegetated Cover 9 3.4 Restricted Access and Institutional Controls 10 3.5 Long Term Ground-Water Monitoring 10 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 5.0 STATEMENT OF PROTECTIVENESS 14 6.0 REFERENCES 15 Project J.O. 04291.18.50 Table of Contents Revision: Final Page iv LIST OF TABLES No. Table Name 3-1 Comparison of Maximum EEQ OM Dilution for 1996-1997, 1998, 2000,2001, and 2003 Sampling Rounds - Girard Point Management Area LIST OF FIGURES No. Figure Name 1-1 Site Plan 1 -2 Site Location Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Title A Record of Decision B Goals Paper C Photo Log - 2003 Five Year Review D GPMA LTM Trend Lines - 2003 Five Year Review Project J.O. 04291.18.50 Five-Year Review Revision: Final Pagel 1.0 PURPOSE AND SITE BACKGROUND 1.1 Purpose A Record of Decision (ROD) for the Girard Point Management Area (GPMA) was prepared by the United States Department of the Navy (Navy) and signed on 30 December 1998 (Navy, 1998). A copy of the ROD entitled Record of Decision, Girard Point Management Area is presented in Appendix A. The selected remedy stipulated in the ROD included base-wide institutional controls that included prohibitive ground water use for human consumption, restrictive future use (i.e., no permanent residential uses), and specific restrictions on construction or development of an outdoor playground). In addition, the specific selected remedy for the GPMA included early removal actions at designated areas prior to remedial construction, construction of a vegetated soil' cover on approximately 21 acres of the 25-acre GPMA, construction of a bituminous concrete pavement cover on the remaining 4 acres, long-term shallow ground-water monitoring (LTM), establishment of site- specific institutional controls (i.e., deed notification prohibiting excavation without prior written approval by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), and five-year reviews to evaluate whether additional remedial actions are required. This initial five year review marks five years since issuance of the ROD. The review also coincides with the end of the first five- year monitoring period of the long-term ground-water monitoring. 1.2 Site Background The GPMA is a peninsula located in the northwest area of the Philadelphia Naval Business Center (formerly the Philadelphia Naval Base) at the confluence of the Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers as shown on Figures 1-1 and 1-2. The 1-95 Girard Point Bridge, spanning the Schuylkill River, passes directly over and bisects the site. The GPMA is a generally flat, vegetated/paved, 25-acre site historically used for the treatment, storage, and disposal of solid wastes generated at the Philadelphia Naval Base. Portions of the area were created by landfilling associated with these waste management activities. Landfills at the site contain construction debris, incinerator ash, suspected foundry slag/sand, spent blasting grit used for paint removal, and municipal waste, as well as, soil and fill materials (river dredge materials). Because the individual sites that comprise the GPMA share a similar site history and proposed future use, a Conceptual Site Model for the Girard Point Management Area (Stone & Webster, 1996) and a Site Characterization Report for the Girard Point Management Area (Stone & Webster, 1997b) were prepared to combine the available data, characterize the nature and extent of the site's constituents of potential concern (COPCs), and evaluate the risks posed by the site to the potential receptors. The proposed future use of the GPMA is currently as an 89-acre light industrial park, the Girard Point Industrial Park , consisting of warehousing and light industrial facilities. To evaluate the nature and extent of the COPCs at the site and the risk posed by the site to the potential receptors, GPMA was divided into two operable units: Zones A and B. Zone A consists of the two site landfills at Installation Restoration Program (IR) Sites 4 and 5. This zone covers an area of 11.2 acres and contains approximately 280,000 cubic yards of fill. Zone B consists of a former 1.25-acre Philadelphia Naval Business Center Girard Point Management Area Five Year Review div42\brac\042911850\task6A_5YEAR\FINALSYEARGPMA.doc Project J.O. 04291.18.50 Five-Year Review Revision: Final Page 2 transformer storage area (IR Site 3), a former 4-acre Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) storage facility (the North West Parking Lot (NWPL)), the former Girard Point incinerator (Building 668), and a 7-acre area formally used to store spent blasting grit (referred to as the area west of the NWPL). Zone B covers an area of 13.2 acres and contains approximately 86,000 cubic yards of fill. The zones, as described above, were delineated for risk assessment purposes. Prior to issuance of the ROD, the site was divided into zones for purpose of remedial alternative discussion. This wifl be discussed further in Section 2.0. 1.3 Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments Based on the human health and ecological risk assessments presented in the Site Characterization Report for the Girard Point Management Area, unacceptable risks were quantified for potential huftian receptors located in Zones A and B, and qualified for ecological receptors located throughout the GPp/LA (Stone & Webster, 1997b). The reader is directed to the Site Characterization Report for the Gir,ard Point Management Area (Stone & Webster, 1997b) for specific information on the human health and ecological risk assessments. A brief description is presented below. The quantitative human health risk assessment concluded that the following exposures resulted in risks above the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accepted risk levels for cancer and/or noncancer effects: Zone A ' • Incidental ingestion of and dermal contact with beryllium and copper in subsurface soil' by construction workers • Incidental ingestion of lead in subsurface soil by construction workers ZoneB • Dermal contact with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in surface soil by maintenance workers, occasional users/trespassers, and construction workers • Incidental ingestion of and dermal contact with 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) and beryllium in surface soil by maintenance workers • Incidental ingestion of lead in surface soil by maintenance workers, occasional users/trespassers, and construction workers • No unacceptable risk was estimated for exposures to COPCs in ground water. Incomplete exposure pathways were assumed for surface water and sediment and therefore no risks were estimated. It was noted in the Site Characterization Report for the Girard Point Management Area (Stone & Webster, 1997b) that asbestos was detected in Zones A and B, and although human health risk associated with asbestos cannot be quantified, the presence of asbestos fibers in soil poses potential risk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Operations Task Force Meeting Highlights
    TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS TASK FORCE MEETING HIGHLIGHTS March 18, 2013 1. Welcome and Introductions Bill Ragozine, Cross County Connection TMA (CCCTMA), welcomed members and thanked them for attending. 2. New Transportation Operation Task Force Chairperson It was announced that Lou Belmonte, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), will become the new Chair of the Transportation Operations Task Force (TOTF) beginning next meeting. Ek Phomsavath, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has accepted the role of Vice-Chair. Bill Ragozine was presented a certificate of appreciation and thanked for all of his hard work and effort for the past several years. 3. Two Minute Agency Reports Each person in attendance introduced themselves and added any relevant ITS and operations updates from their agency. Some of the highlights include: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation: PennDOT will be initiating three additional Emergency Service Patrol routes operating in the AM and PM peak periods along the US 30 Bypass, US 422, and PA 309. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC): The PTC has initiated a statewide CCTV project to put cameras at each of their interchanges. Another project will be installing 15 Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) between Reading and Willow Grove interchanges. Cross County Connection TMA: The CCTMA has developed a new smart phone app that allows users to check real-time traffic conditions and view live traffic cameras at intersections known for congestion in South Jersey. For more information, go to www.njintersections.com. DVRPC: RIMIS is currently installed at over 70 entities in the region. Since the last TOTF meeting, DVRPC has started coordinating with Haverford and Lower Merion Police Departments to use RIMIS during the USGA Open Golf Championship this June.
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrine Falcon Research/Management
    PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION BUREAU OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL JOB REPORT PROJECT CODE NO.: 06715 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Research/Management JOB CODE NO.: 71501 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Investigations PERIOD COVERED: 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 COOPERATING AGENCIES: The Aark Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Chalfont; Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; Pennsylvania American Water Company, Hershey; Carbon County Environmental Education Center, Summit Hill; Comcast Center, Philadelphia; Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, Phillipsburg, New Jersey; Delaware River Port Authority; Delaware Valley Raptor Center, Milford; Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area; Gulf Tower, Pittsburgh; Make a Wish Foundation, Pittsburgh; The National Aviary, Pittsburgh; New Jersey Division of Fish, Game, and Wildlife; Packer Ave. Marine Terminal, Philadelphia; Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission; Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission; Philadelphia City Hall; Philadelphia Zoo; Pocono Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Stroudsburg; PPL Corporation; Red Creek Wildlife Center, Schuylkill Haven; Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Philadelphia; Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education - Wildlife Division, Philadelphia; Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL; Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research, Newark, Delaware; University of Pittsburgh; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh. WORK LOCATIONS: Statewide PREPARED BY: F. Arthur McMorris, Patricia Barber and Daniel W. Brauning DATE: 12 March 2014 ABSTRACT The long-term management goal of this project is to re-establish a self-sustaining peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) population in Pennsylvania (Brauning and Hassinger 2001; Brauning et al. 2013). Monitoring of peregrine falcon nesting activity was coordinated by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • PIER 2 - GIRARD POINT 2700 & 2706R PENROSE AVENUE PHILADELPHIA, PA BRT # 88-4297210 and #88-4297220
    FOR SALE PIER 2 - GIRARD POINT 2700 & 2706R PENROSE AVENUE PHILADELPHIA, PA BRT # 88-4297210 and #88-4297220 74,402 SQUARE FEET ON 12.6+ ACRES LOCATED AT THE CONFLUENCE OF THE SCHUYLKILL AND DELAWARE RIVERS ZONED I-3 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) www.cbre.com FOR SALE 2700 & 2706R PENROSE AVENUE PIER 2 - GIRARD POINT PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145 PRACTICE FACILITY FOOD CENTER PACKER MARINE TERMINAL SCHUYLKILL RIVER 35’ Mean Low Water PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS PHILADELPHIA Land Area: Approximately 3 Acres Water Surface / Riparian Rights FUTURE Approximately 7.32 Acres Fast (Dry Surface) Land Area NAVY YARD PORT FACILITY Parcel A - 57,673 SF Building 2706R Penrose Avenue: - 10.32 Acres - 25’ clear ceiling heights - Real Estate Taxes: $12,730.00 (2016) 2700 Parcel B - 16,729 SF Building Penrose Avenue 2700 Penrose Avenue: - 2.33 Acres (Parcel B) - 40’ clear ceiling heights DELAWARE RIVER - Real Estate Taxes: $16,080.00 (2016) 45’ Mean Low Water Number/Size of Berths: 1 berth / East side: 950’; West side 925’ 2706R Penrose Depth at MLW: 35 foot channel Avenue (Parcel A) Rail: Possible Utilities: Electric (PECO) and Gas (PGW) NEW JERSEY Zoning: I-3 (Heavy Industrial) Highway Access: I-95, I-76 and Route 291 are within 1 mile Clearance at Center above Girard Point Bridge - 135’ Mean High Water Commodore Barry Bridge - 192’ Delaware Memorial Bridge - 188’ FOR SALE 2700 & 2706R PENROSE AVENUE PIER 2 - GIRARD POINT PHILADELPHIA, PA 19145 SITE PLAN PROPERTY LOCATION CONTACT US PATRICK GREEN MICHAEL MULLEN CBRE, INC Executive Vice President Vice President Two Liberty Place, Suite 3000 +1 215 561 8940 +1 215 561 8927 50 South 16th Street [email protected] [email protected] Philadelphia, PA 19102 Licensed: PA Licensed: PA +1 215 561 8900 Licensed Salesperson: NJ Licensed Salesperson: NJ Licensed Real Estate Broker www.cbre.com © 2016 CBRE, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Connections 2040 Transportation Investments Appendix
    DRAFT Front Cover DRAFT The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is The symbol in our dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, logo is adapted planning professionals, and the public with a common from the official vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping DVRPC seal and is designed as a the way we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring consensus on improving transportation, promoting symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar smart growth, protecting the environment, and signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, State of New Jersey. Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated federal grants from the U.S. Department of Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the future. Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Doe/Ea-1876D 1
    DOE/EA-1876D Pennsylvania State Energy Program’s Conergy Navy Yard Solar Project Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania , DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 DOE/EA-1876D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For The PENNSYLVANIA STATE ENERGY PROGRAM’S CONERGY NAVY YARD SOLAR PROJECT PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY 5 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 5 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED 7 1.3 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 7 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES 8 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION 8 2.2 PENNSYLVANIA’S PROPOSED ACTION 8 2.3 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE 11 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT DISMISSED 11 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 12 3.1 NATURAL RESOURCES 13 3.1.1 WATER RESOURCES 13 3.1.2 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS 16 3.1.3 VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 17 3.1.4 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE 18 3.1.5 NOISE 19 3.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES 20 3.2.1 VISUAL RESOURCES 20 3.2.2 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES 21 3.3 SOCIOECONOMIC RESOURCES 22 3.3.1 LAND USE 22 3.3.2 PLANNING POLICIES AND CONTROLS 22 3.3.3 DEMOGRAPHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE 23 3.4 INFRASTRUCTURE 24 3.4.1 ROADWAYS AND TRAFFIC 24 3.4.2 POTABLE WATER 25 3.4.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 24 3.4.4 SANITARY SEWER 25 3.4.5 ENERGY SYSTEM 25 3.4.6 SOLID WASTE 26 3.4.7 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 26 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 27 4.1 NATURAL RESOURCES 27 4.1.1 WATER RESOURCES 27 4.1.2 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS 29 4.1.3 VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE 29 4.1.4 AIR QUALITY 29 4.1.5 NOISE 33 4.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES 33 2 DOE/EA-1876D
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrine Falcon Investigations
    PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION BUREAU OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL JOB REPORT PROJECT CODE NO.: 06715 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Research/Management JOB CODE NO.: 71501 TITLE: Peregrine Falcon Investigations PERIOD COVERED: 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 COOPERATING AGENCIES: The Aark Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center, Newtown; Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia; Carbon County Environmental Education Center; Comcast Center, Philadelphia; Dauphin County Wildlife Rescue, Harrisburg; Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, New Hope; Delaware River Port Authority; Delaware Valley Raptor Center, Milford; Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area; Gulf Tower, Pittsburgh; Make a Wish Foundation, Pittsburgh; The National Aviary, Pittsburgh; New Jersey Division of Fish, Game, and Wildlife; Packer Ave. Marine Terminal, Philadelphia; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission; Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission; Philadelphia City Hall; Philadelphia Zoo; PPL Corporation; Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education - Wildlife Division, Philadelphia; Three Rivers Avian Center, Brooks, West Virginia; Tri-State Bird Rescue & Research, Newark, Delaware; University of Pittsburgh; US Army Corps of Engineers; US Fish & Wildlife Service; Webbed Foot Wildlife Rehabilitation Clinic, Ambler; Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Pittsburgh. WORK LOCATION(S): Statewide PREPARED BY: F. Arthur McMorris and Daniel W. Brauning DATE: 13 August 2010 ABSTRACT The long-term management goal of this project is to re-establish a self-sustaining peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) population in Pennsylvania (Brauning and Hassinger, 2001). Peregrine falcon coordinator Dr. Art McMorris and over 60 volunteers monitored peregrine falcons at 44 sites and searched for falcons at additional locations across the state. One new nest was identified in 2009, and 2 nests were active after several years of inactivity, raising the total number of active nests to 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision Girard Point Management Area
    "^ RECORD OF DECISION SDMS [}oclD 2103220 GIRARD POINT MANAGEMENT AREA PHILADELPHIA NAVAL COMPLEX DECEMBER 1998 Page i U.S. Department of the Navy - Northem Division November 1998 RECORD OF DECISION Girard Poiiit Management Area Philadelphia Naval Base Philadelphia, Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page Number i DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION 1) SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1 3 2) SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIYiriES 3 a. Site Use and Response History 3 b. Enforcement History 4 3) COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 5 4) SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION 5 5 5) SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 5 a. Nature and Extent 7 b. Fate and Transport 10 6) SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 12 7) DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES 14 8) DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 16 9) SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 17 10) THE SELECTED REMEDY 11) STATUARY DETERMINATIONS 12) STATE ROLE 20 13) RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY 14) REFERENCES LIST OF nOURES Figure No. Title 1 GPMA - Site Location Map Philadelphia Naval Complex Girard Point Management Area - Record of Decision LEGEhO 'onmde Grvd Pont logenientfreoBaiiKiory fmmdt Sotd Wde lianogementlhtBoiiidanf I I ZoneA FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP GIRARD POINT MANAGEMENT AREA STOC I HBS1D) ENVRONCNrC ItOiaoa tn SDIVKZS A' cic)inni,iu 06034 lin9aiS:OI(lctolKil99e llni«nj:llt]yne Rni9on(}tllo«l9% iaJm^-nHtmi llnisai2:2]r(tiN96 Urania 21 OclBSS ilTi\Bw\iwnVtnltfipl(li|i mwmdno um Page ii U.S. Department of the Navy - Northem Division November 1998 RECORD OF DECISION DECLARATION SITE NAME
    [Show full text]
  • Reliable Funding for Pennsylvania's Transportation System
    Reliable funding for Pennsylvania's transportation system. Because of the eroding value of gas tax revenue and unreliable federal funding, we’re looking for alternative sources of funding to take care of Pennsylvania’s transportation system. We have a serious problem, right now Despite rising traffic and freight travel in our state, the funds available to maintain our transportation system have not kept pace with our needs due to the eroding value of gas tax and uncertainty in future funding. Our investment needs are outgrowing our current funding, and this gap gets worse every year. That’s why we've launched a new program – PennDOT Pathways. Through this program, we are analyzing new future-focused sources of funding for our transportation system that could better serve our communities and all Pennsylvanians for the next generation. In the current phase of the Pathways program, we are focusing on our highway and bridge funding needs. Many of Pennsylvania's highways and bridges are in need of replacement or rehabilitation. We own, operate and maintain 25,400 bridges across the state. Of those bridges, more than 2,500 have been rated in poor condition. The average bridge age is 50 years, and with a typical life span of approximately 75 years, this need is not going away anytime soon. Repairs are critical to maintain safety, and making these repairs on our interstate bridges has required diverting funds from regional projects. 1 At Risk: Bridge & 74% 17% 9% Gas Taxes* Vehicle General *Includes Federal and Highway State Gas Taxes Fees Fund
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrine Falcon Management Plan, Excerpted from the Handbook of Bird Biology
    MANAGEMENT AND BIOLOGY OF THE PEREGRINE FALCON (Falco peregrinus) IN PENNSYLVANIA TEN YEAR PLAN (2013 – 2022) MANAGEMENT AND BIOLOGY OF THE PEREGRINE FALCON (Falco peregrinus) IN PENNSYLVANIA TEN YEAR PLAN (2013 – 2022) Prepared by Daniel W. Brauning Wildlife Biologist Patricia Barber Wildlife Biologist Dr. F. Arthur McMorris Peregrine Falcon Coordinator Bureau of Wildlife Management Pennsylvania Game Commission 2001 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA 17110-9797 Draft February 2013 Final June 2013 - ii - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) was federally Endangered, but with population improvements, was removed from the federal Endangered Species list in 1999. It remains on the Pennsylvania Endangered list until population goals can be met. Following a dramatic decline as the result of environmental contaminants and a similarly dramatic recovery, the peregrine falcon serves as a modern symbol of restoration and hope. Two peregrine falcon populations occurred historically in Pennsylvania: the arctic subspecies (F.p.tundrius), which migrates through the state in low numbers in spring and fall; and a nesting subspecies (F.p.anatum). The breeding population in Pennsylvania numbered as many as 44 pairs in the early decades of the 20th century before completely disappearing from the eastern United States. The decline of the species here, and worldwide, is largely attributed to organochloride pesticide contamination. The Peregrine Fund Inc. pioneered the reintroduction of this federally Endangered species into the eastern United States. They used three reintroduction locations in Pennsylvania during the 1970s and 1980s, and the Pennsylvania Game Commission released birds at four locations in the state during the 1990s. By 2003, the eastern population had grown to approximately 336 nesting pairs, and by 2012 at least 32 nests were known in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: 05-16-2018 LOCATION RESTRICTION DATE CONTRACTOR PHILADELPHIA *I-95 North ITS Installation: LANE CLOSURE Between 5/14/18-5/15/18 Miller Bros
    PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 6-0 PHILADELPHIA REGION TRAFFIC BULLETIN NOTE: SCHEDULES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENNDOT ROADWAY MAINTENANCE HOTLINE 1-800-FIX-ROAD TO CHECK REAL-TIME HIGHWAY CONDITIONS VISIT 511PA.COM; DOWNLOAD THE 511PA APP; OR CALL 5-1-1 DATE: 05-16-2018 LOCATION RESTRICTION DATE CONTRACTOR PHILADELPHIA *I-95 North ITS Installation: LANE CLOSURE between 5/14/18-5/15/18 Miller Bros. Wanamaker Ave. & Philadelphia International Airport. 9 PM - 5 AM. Aramingo Ave. on-ramp to I-95 Deck & Joint Repair: RAMP CLOSED & DETOURED. 5/14/18 & 5/16/18 Maintenance South & Betsy Ross Bridge 8 PM - 5 AM. DETOUR POSTED. *US 1 N & S (Roosevelt Extension) Drain Cleaning/Debris Removal: INTERMITTENT 5/14/18-5/17/18 Maintenance LANE RESTRICTIONS between I-76 & 9th St. 9:30 AM - 2 PM. *I-676 E & W Drain Cleaning/Debris Removal: INTERMITTENT 5/14/18-5/17/18 Maintenance LANE RESTRICTIONS between I-76 & I-95. 9:30 AM - 2 PM. *I-95 N & S Drain Cleaning/Debris Removal: INTERMITTENT 5/14/18-5/17/18 Maintenance LANE RESTRICTIONS between Phila. Int. Airport & PA 63 (Woodhaven Rd.). 9:30 AM - 2 PM. *I-76 E & W Drain Cleaning/Debris Removal: INTERMITTENT 5/14/18-5/17/18 Maintenance LANE RESTRICTIONS between US 1 (City Ave.) & 26th St. 9:30 AM - 2 PM. *I-76 West Viaduct Construction: LANE CLOSURE between 5/14/18-5/17/18 Buckley & Company, South St. & I-676 Interchanges. 9 PM - 5 AM. Inc. *I-676 E & W Clean-up & Removal of Shielding: CLOSED & 5/14/18-5/17/18 Buckley & Company, DETOURED between I-76 & Broad St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Rebuilding I-95 in Pennsylvania Ebuilding the Aging Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania Is an Epic Undertaking That Will Unfold Over the Next Generation
    NEWS i2017 -95 2017 The Road to Rebuilding I-95 in Pennsylvania ebuilding the aging Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania is an epic undertaking that will unfold over the next generation. It involves hundreds of engineers, technicians, R tradespeople, commuters and residents in a process to replace and modernize our share of one of America’s busiest and most economically-important highways. To manage the high costs and multiple engineering challenges ahead, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), the region’s transportation planning organization, have organized I-95 into four areas, or Sectors A, B, C and D. The Sectors are prioritized, with the areas of I-95 most in need of repair being addressed first. “The reconstruction of I-95 will continue to impact the region, its drivers and its communities for the foreseeable future,” said Elaine Elbich, P.E., PennDOT’s lead project manager for rebuilding I-95 in Pennsylvania. “We’re committed to identifying and addressing those impacts on daily life during construction, just as we’re exploring ways to ensure that the positive changes we make in the communities under and along I-95 are sustainable in the long term.” As illustrated on the graphic (left) , Sector A extends from Interstate 676 north through the Cottman Avenue (Route 73) Interchange; Sector B from I-676 south to the Girard Point Bridge approaching the airport; Sector C from the Girard Point Bridge to the Delaware State Line; and Sector D through Bucks County to New Jersey. Currently, five Sector A projects are rebuilding eight miles of I-95 north of Center City Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrine Falcon Dispersal and Habitat Imprinting (1994-2013)
    PEREGRINE FALCON DISPERSAL AND HABITAT IMPRINTING (1994-2013) BY ANN DEVINE CAPSTONE PROJECT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Associate Professor Michael Ward, Adviser Piper Hodson, NRES Online Program Director Adjunct Assistant Professor Thomas J. Benson, CTAP Coordinator, Illinois Natural History Survey ABSTRACT Following the DDT-induced population collapse in the mid-twentieth century, peregrine falcons were extirpated throughout Pennsylvania. As a result of decades of recovery efforts, peregrine falcon populations have experienced rapid growth, and their populations are still expanding. Yet, the majority of occupied nest sites are no longer on cliff sites along major river corridors, but rather on anthropomorphic structures, such as bridges, buildings and smokestacks. This study focuses on the recovering peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) population in eastern North America. This study examines peregrine falcons’ proclivity for habitat imprinting on anthropomorphic structures for breeding. The study also examines sex-biased differences in dispersal from banding to breeding site. Archival data from the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s (PGC) Peregrine Falcon Research Management Program annual reports, 1994-2013, were used to assess peregrine behavior. Female peregrine falcons showed significantly longer average dispersal distances (243.7 km, n=54) than males (111.2 km, n=32). Peregrine falcons banded on anthropomorphic structures showed statistically significant nesting preferences to urban structures, however not absolute (n=87). These findings have important management implications for meeting Pennsylvania’s targeted population goals for endangered species delisting.
    [Show full text]