DOCSLIB.ORG

October, 2017 List of Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October, 2017 List of Tables ASSESSMENT OF CONSORTIUM APPROACH IN FOOD VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT ON INCOME OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN TANZANIA, EAST AFRICA Prepared by EMMANUEL EJEWULE CENTRE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, IBADAN, NIGERIA IFAD – UNIVERSITY WIN- WIN PROJECT OCTOBER, 2017 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ iv ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background of the Study ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Methodology and Technical Approach ............................................................................ 7 2.1 The Study Area ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Research Design .............................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Study Population ............................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Sampling Procedure and Data Collection Method ...................................................... 9 2.5 Sample Size Determination ......................................................................................... 10 2.6 Method of Data Collection ........................................................................................... 11 2.7 Data Collection Procedure ........................................................................................... 11 2.8 Analytical Methods and Techniques .......................................................................... 12 2.9 Experimental and Randomized Control Variable .................................................... 12 2.10 Measurement of variables and a priori expectations ................................................. 13 3.0 Value Chain Development in Agriculture ..................................................................... 17 3.1 Forms of Value Chain Approaches to Agribusiness ................................................. 18 3.1.1 Case Study of Mozambique: Cashew Value Chain ...........................................................19 3.1.2 Case Study of Kenya: Green Beans Value Chain ..............................................................20 3.2 Consortium Approach to Food Value Chain Development ..................................... 21 3.3 Southern Highland Rice Consortium (SHIRCO) ...................................................... 23 3.4 Competitive African Rice Initiative (CARI) Project ................................................ 24 3.5 Regional East Africa Community Trades in Staple (REACTS) Project ........................ 25 3.6 Characteristics of Paddy (Rice) .................................................................................. 26 3.6.1 Global Rice Summary .........................................................................................................26 3.6.2 Paddy (Rice) Production in Tanzania ................................................................................27 3.6.3 Rice Consumption in Tanzania ..........................................................................................29 3.6.4 Rice Market .........................................................................................................................30 Emmanuel Ejewule IFAD Report ii 3.6.5 Excerpt of Human Success Story from SHIRCO Consortium .........................................32 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS .................................................................................... 36 4.1 Socio-Economic Characteristics of Respondents ...................................................... 36 4.2 Group Membership of Farmers in SHIRCO ............................................................. 38 4.3 Main Planting Season and Source of Land ................................................................ 40 4.4 Research Results on Objective 1: To Determine the Effectiveness of Consortium 41 4.4.1 Skills and Knowledge ..........................................................................................................41 4.4.2 Production Inputs and Technology ....................................................................................44 4.4.3 Source and Type of Inputs Accessed by Farmers ..............................................................44 4.4.4 Source and Type of Production Technology Accessed by Farmers in SHIRCO Consortium ..........................................................................................................................................49 4.4.5 Warehousing Receipt System (WRS) in SHIRCO Consortium ........................................51 4.4.6 Farmers Access to Finance in SHIRCO Consortium .......................................................53 4.4.7 Marketing of Produce (Paddy) by Farmers in the Consortium ........................................54 4.5 Impacts of Consortium Approach on Mean Harvest, Revenue and Land ............. 55 4.5.1 Costs-Benefits Analysis of SHIRCO Consortium ..............................................................58 4.6 Research Results on Objective 2: ................................................................................ 61 4.7 Research Results on Objective 3: ................................................................................ 63 5.0 Identified Challenges in SHIRCO Consortium ......................................................... 64 5.1 Farmers ......................................................................................................................... 64 5.2 Input Suppliers ............................................................................................................. 65 5.4 Service Providers .......................................................................................................... 66 5.4 Lead Firm ...................................................................................................................... 66 6.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 67 6.1 Summary of Major Findings ....................................................................................... 67 6.2 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 68 6.3 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 69 6.4 Policy Implication: Creating Enabling Environment ............................................... 71 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 72 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 53 Emmanuel Ejewule IFAD Report iii LIST OF FIGURE Figure 1.1: Map of Study Area.............................................................................................................14 Figure 2.2: Kilimo Trust Consortium Approach to Value Chain Development (KTCA2VCD)………………………………………………………………………………...1 9 Figure 4.1: Distribution of Farmers by Training Received Before & After in the Consortium…….53 Figure 4.2: Distribution of Farmers by Level of Skill & Knowledge Enough to Continue in the Consortium………………………………………………………………………….....54 Figure 4.3: Inputs Bought in Required Quantity and Quality by Farmers Before and After in the Consortium…………………………………………………………………………………...55 Figure 4.4: Technologies Accessed in SHIRCO Consortium………………………………………..60 Figure 4.5: External Financing in SHIRCO Consortium…………………………………………....64 Figure 4.6: Cost- Benefits Analysis of SHIRCO Consortium for Paddy per hectare………………70 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Sample Size Determination of the Study………………………………………..........16 Table 3.1: Estimates of Tanzania Rice Consumption and Production..………………………….20 Table 3.2: Tanzania Rice Production, Consumption, Export & Import…………………............22 Table 4.1: Distribution of Demographic Composition of Farmers..……………………….…….26 Table 4.2: Distribution of Farmland Used in the Consortium......…………………………….…26 Table 4.3: Distribution of Farmers by Satisfaction to Skill & Knowledge...…………………....29 Table 4.4: Inputs Access, Source, Delivery Mechanism, Payment Modalities and Satisfaction………….…………………………………………………………………....29 Table 4.5: Source of Inputs Accessed in SHIRCO Consortium by Farmers…………………56 Table 4.6: Inputs Delivery to Farmers in SHIRCO Consortium……………………………..57 Table 4.7: Payment Modality of Inputs Received by Farmers from Inputs Suppliers………58 Table 4.8: Timeliness of Accessing Inputs from Suppliers and Technology………………...…59 Table 4.9: Source of Technologies Accessed in SHIRCO Consortium………………………61 Table 4.10: Payment Modality for Technology by Farmers………………………………….61 Table 4.11: Forms of Marketing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Investment Profile Water for Agriculture and Energy -Final Draft
    NATIONAL INVESTMENT PROFILE WATER FOR AGRICULTURE AND ENERGY -FINAL DRAFT- TANZANIA National Investment Profile. Water for Agriculture and Energy: Tanzania EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tanzania’s vision for using water resources for agriculture and energy are firmly embedded in both irrigation and hydropower development policies respectively. These issues are both part of the Tanzania poverty eradication agenda in line with the Tanzania Development Vision 2025 and the five year National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty, commonly known as MKUKUTA I (2005-2010) and MKUKUTA II (2010-2015) which is currently underway. The key policies which are followed for agriculture and hydropower are further supported by the Continental movement towards Africa’s Green revolution. Tanzania has signed the Comprehensive Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) compact and has initiated a number of programs and reforms to increase the investment in the agricultural sector. These programs have a strong emphasis on irrigation. Despite a total irrigation development potential in Tanzania of 29.4 million ha, only 450 392 ha have been irrigated thus demonstrating the need to develop the sector. Furthermore, irrigation practices in Tanzania show low water use efficiency, low water productivity and over dependency on surface water as a major source for irrigation development. The increased investment via the CAADP Compact should be able to support the development of the sector. Hydropower in the country contributes almost 50 percent of the energy produced. On a large scale, hydropower is being developed as a combined hydro-thermal system. On a smaller scale, hydropower is used as a source of renewable energy and a way to increase rural electrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission
    RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION Public Disclosure Authorized LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The RICE Value Chain in Tanzania
    THE RICE VALUE CHAIN IN TANZANIA A report from the Southern Highlands Food Systems Programme R. Trevor Wilson I. Lewis This background paper is made available without further edits to the version presented by its authors. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving Farmers' Access to And
    CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMME Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania – Phase 2 R 8406 (ZA 0634) FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 April 2005 – 31 January 2006 Nick G. Lyimo Uyole Agricultural Research Institute Date FTR completed: 24 February 2006 "This publication is an output from a research project funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.” R8406: Improving farmers’ access to and management of disease resistant maize cultivars in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Crop Protection Programme. Acronyms and Abbreviations ADP Mbozi Agricultural Development Programme Mbozi Trust Fund AMSDP Agricultural Marketing Sector Development Programme ARI Agricultural Research Institute ASDP Agricultural Sector Development Programme ASPS Agricultural Sector Programme Support CPHP Crop Post Harvest Programme CPP Crop Protection Programme CSC Council Standing Committee DADS District Agricultural Development Strategy DAEO District Agricultural Extension Officer DALDO District Agricultural and Livestock Development Officer DC District Commissioner DE District Economist DED District Executive Director DFID Department for International Development DFT District Facilitation Team FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FCM Full Council Meeting FFS Farmer Field School FIPS Farm Inputs Promoters GLS Grey Leaf Spot GTZ German Technical Cooperation HSG Highland Seed Growers IFAD
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania
    The United Republic of Tanzania Tanzania Investment Centre Investment Opportunities in the Oil Palm Value Chain, Tanzania Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................................. v 1 Overview of the Oil Palm Producing Regions in Tanzania ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Data Collection .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Edible Oils: The Untapped Sub-sector in Tanzania ......................................................................................... 2 3 Oil Palm Production ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Oil Palm Production in Tanzania ................................................................................................................ 4 3.1.1 Historical and Current Global Production of Palm Oil ................................................................ 5
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Mbeya Region, Southwestern Tanzania
    128 Notes Azania XI Archaeological survey in Mbeya Region, Southern Tanzania I" Azania XVII we included a paper by Thomas Wynn and Thomas Chadderdon on the distinctive LSA Kiwira Industry in Tukuyu District, between RunJ!We Mountain and the northern tip of Lake Nyasa . Tl1e present note place$ that work in the context of a broader survey in that reJ!ion by a team from the University of Illinois at Urbana . Sally McBrearty is complttinJ! her thesis at Urbana, Dr Waane is with the·Tanzanian An­ tiquities, while Dr Wynn is on faculty at the University of Colorado. While this volume of A-zania was in press, we discovered that, as a result of some unexplained com­ munication problem, another version of this paper had appeared in Tanzania Notes and Records, 88/89 {for 1982), pp, 15-32 , At this late staJ!e and in view of various editorial amendments and reduction aJ!reed with the authors when the note was offered to Azania and accepted in JIOOd faith, we have decided not to delete it from our proofs. We are happy to have the aJ!ret~ment of the editors ofTNR to this. Normally, however, we would not carry an article or note already published or accepted elsewhere. The TNR version will be valuable to a number of readers for its illustration of stone artefacts. In 1976 we undertook an archaeological survey of portions of lleje, Kyela, Mbeya, Mbozi and Tukuyu Districts of Mbeya Region in southern Tanzania. As no formal archaeological reconnaissance of the region had previously been undertaken, our intention was to establish the general outlines of prehistoric occupation of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe
    Evaluation of the Bringing Nutrition to Scale Project in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Regions (2013–2017) Evaluation Report 23 April 2018 Prepared by Stephen Turner (Team Leader) Bjorn Ljungqvist Joyce Kinabo Jim Grabham Proposal contacts: Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER The evaluation team are grateful to the nutrition colleagues at the UNICEF Country Office in Dar es Salaam and the Sub-office in Mbeya for all their support in providing information and facilitating meetings throughout this assignment. Quality support for the evaluation has been provided by the QS team assigned to the evaluation: Stephen Anderson (Food Economy Group) and Stephen Lister (Mokoro Ltd). The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The designations employed, maps and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNICEF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Evaluation of Bringing Nutrition to Scale in Iringa, Mbeya and Njombe Contents Summary v 1. Introduction __________________________________________________ 1 1.1. Evaluation purpose and scope ___________________________________ 1 1.2. Country context ______________________________________________ 1 1.3. Nutrition in Tanzania and the project area __________________________ 2 2. The BNTS and ASRP projects _____________________________________ 5 2.1. Project description ____________________________________________ 5 2.2. Key stakeholders and linkages ___________________________________ 8 2.3. Summary of reported performance ______________________________ 10 3. Approach and methods _________________________________________ 11 3.1. Evaluation approach __________________________________________ 11 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Tanzania National Nutrition Survey July2019.Indd
    United Republic of Tanzania TANZANIA NATIONAL NUTRITION SURVEY 2018 JUNE 2019 United Republic of Tanzania TANZANIA NATIONAL NUTRITION SURVEY 2018 JUNE 2019 Tanzania National Nutrition Survey 2018 i TANZANIA NATIONAL NUTRITION SURVEY 2018 FINAL REPORT This survey was possible thanks to technical and financial support from the following partners: ® ii Tanzania National Nutrition Survey 2018 Additional information about 2018 TNNS may be obtained from Dr. Vincent D. Assey, Managing Director, Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, 22 Barack Obama Drive, P.O. Box 977, Dar es Salaam. Telephone: +255 22 2118137, Fax: +255 22 2116713, Email: [email protected]; the National Bureau of Sta- tistics, Head Office, Jakaya Kikwete Road, P.O. Box 2683, Dodoma. Telephone: +255 26 2963822, Fax: +255 26 2963828, Email: [email protected]; and Fanny Cassard, SMART Survey Consultant – Nutritionist, Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-9976-910-86-5 Recommended Citation: Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC) [Tanzania Mainland], Ministry of Health (MoH) [Zanzibar], Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), National Bu- reau of Statistics (NBS), Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS) [Zanzibar] and UNICEF. 2018. Tanzania National Nutrition Survey using SMART Methodology (TNNS) 2018. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: MoHCDGEC, MoH, TFNC, NBS, OCGS, and UNICEF. Tanzania National Nutrition Survey 2018 iii Foreword The 2018 Tanzania National Nutrition Survey using SMART Methodology (TNNS) is the second survey of this kind to be conducted in Tanzania. Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Tanzania Mainland; and Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), Zanzibar; conducted the survey in collaboration with the President’s Office – Regional Administration and Local Governments; Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC), Tanzania Mainland; the Ministry of Health (MoH), Zanzibar and the University of Dodoma (UDOM).
    [Show full text]
  • Avocado Production and Local Trade in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: a Case of an Emerging Trade Commodity from Horticulture
    Article Avocado Production and Local Trade in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: A Case of an Emerging Trade Commodity from Horticulture Ibrahim Juma 1,2,*, Hanna Fors 3, Helena Persson Hovmalm 1, Agnes Nyomora 2, Moneim Fatih 1, Mulatu Geleta 1, Anders S. Carlsson 1 and Rodomiro Octavio Ortiz 1 1 Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 101, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden; [email protected] (H.P.H.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (A.S.C.); [email protected] (R.O.O.) 2 Department of Botany, University of Dar es Salaam, Post Office Box 35060, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; [email protected] 3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (LAPF), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 66, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46 730 981 307 Received: 25 October 2019; Accepted: 8 November 2019; Published: 12 November 2019 Abstract: Avocado crop in Tanzania is sparingly investigated regardless of being an important fruit commodity. This study was undertaken to explore the yield and the value chain of this crop in the country. Data were collected mainly by face-to-face interviews with 275 avocado farmers, 231 avocado traders and 16 key informants. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used for data analysis. The average crop yield ranged from 76 to 124 kg plant−1 between regions. The average price for the farmers’ produce ranged from US$ 0.30 to 0.45 kg−1 between regions.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce a History of Rungwe
    International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce Vol. 2 No. 2, April-2017 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE ARTS AND COMMERCE A HISTORY OF RUNGWE DISTRICT IN TANZANIA FROM PRE-COLONIAL TO COLONIAL PERIOD Reginald Mwakilambo Department of History, The Open University of Tanzania Abstract This article highlights the historical events that occurred in Rungwe District, Tanzania in pre colonial and colonial periods. It gives an analysis of the situation during the pre-colonial period and how the district became integrated in the capitalist economic system after the establishment of colonial rule. Capitalist relations were in terms of the establishment of cash crop estates as an element of colonial economic structure. Both peasant-type and estate productions involved productions for exports to metropolitan countries by firmly solidifying world capitalist economic relations as the metropoles were set ready to receive processed products from the district. 1.0 Introduction Rungwe District lies between longitudes “80 30′ and 90 30′ E” and latitudes “330 and 340 S” in the southern part of Mbeya Region.1 It is bordered by Mbeya District to the North, Makete District in Njombe Region to the East, Kyela District in the South and Ileje District in the West. The district consists of four divisions, which are “Ukukwe, Busokelo, Pakati and Tukuyu.”2 The geographical boundaries of the district have never been fixed in the past, but they have been changing by differently defined by the previous colonial governments of the Germans and British, and later by the independent government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The beginning of German colonial rule in Rungwe District was in 1893 by the German explorer Major Von Wissmann who founded a government station at a place along Lake Nyasa which was given the name “Langenburg” in the honour of “Prinz von Hohenlohe-Langenburg” the champion of German colonial endeavours (currently known as Lumbila in Ludewa District).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to Vol 4B
    Vote 78 Mbeya Region Councils in the Region Council District Councils Code 2007 Mbeya City Council 2030 Tunduma Town Council 3037 Chunya District Council 3038 Ileje District Council 3039 Kyela District Council 3040 Mbeya District Council 3041 Mbozi District Council 3042 Rungwe District Council 3087 Mbarali District Council 3114 Momba District Council 3140 Busokelo District Council 2 Vote 78 Mbeya Region Council Development Budget Summary Local and Foreign 2014/15 Code Council Local Foreign Total 2007 Mbeya City Council 8,280,514,000 5,106,984,000 13,387,498,000 3037 Chunya District Council 4,450,970,000 2,595,407,000 7,046,377,000 3038 Ileje District Council 1,436,699,000 1,582,949,000 3,019,648,000 3039 Kyela District Council 3,401,266,000 1,787,462,000 5,188,728,000 3040 Mbeya District Council 2,944,629,000 4,125,608,000 7,070,237,000 3041 Mbozi District Council 3,507,815,000 2,575,614,000 6,083,429,000 3042 Rungwe District Council 3,275,065,000 2,500,384,000 5,775,449,000 3087 Mbarali District Council 3,348,680,000 6,568,598,000 9,917,278,000 3114 Momba District Council 4,121,306,000 1,674,222,000 5,795,528,000 3140 Busokelo District Council 2,676,586,000 991,371,000 3,667,957,000 Total 37,443,530,000 29,508,599,000 66,952,129,000 3 Vote 78 Mbeya Region Code Description 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Actual Expenditure Approved Expenditure Estimates Local Foreign Local Foreign Local Foreign Total Shs.
    [Show full text]