DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly Macdougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912 Author(S): Sharon E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly Macdougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912 Author(S): Sharon E The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912 Author(s): Sharon E. Kingsland Source: Isis, Vol. 82, No. 3 (Sep., 1991), pp. 479-509 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/233227 Accessed: 19-05-2017 16:27 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/233227?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The History of Science Society, The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis This content downloaded from 128.128.250.98 on Fri, 19 May 2017 16:27:18 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Battling Botanist Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912 By Sharon E. Kingsland* T HE EARLY YEARS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY saw the waxing and waning of an important controversy in American biology: whether ev- olutionary biology should be above all an experimental science. From 1902 to about 1910 debate centered on the theoretical and experimental work of Hugo de Vries, professor of botany at the University of Amsterdam. This article examines the controversy with the aim of combinirig synthesis and revision in the history of evolutionary biology. This episode illuminates a number of themes that have been addressed recently by historians: the division of biology into warring groups of naturalists and experimentalists; the agricultural origins of genetics in Amer- ica; the origins of an engineering approach to biology in Jacques Loeb's radically experimental program; the "struggle for authority" between geneticists and other biologists in the field of heredity in America; and the anti-Darwinian climate in evolutionary theory at the turn of the century and the eventual resolution of these conflicts in the synthetic theory of evolution that emerged in the 1930s.' The story unfolded here, while bringing together these themes, will at the same time recast some of the arguments advanced in the literature. My first goal is to investigate how de Vries's mutation theory gave the exper- imental biologist scientific authority in a particular institutional and national con- text. Elaboration of this context requires a sharper focus than the existing liter- ature on the reception of the mutation theory provides.2 I shall discuss the use of * History of Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. I am grateful to Paul Romney and Mary P. Winsor for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES 86-08377). 1 Garland E. Allen, "Naturalists and Experimentalists: The Genotype and the Phenotype," Studies in History of Biology, 1979, 3:179-209; Barbara A. Kimmelman, "A Progressive Era Discipline: Genetics at American Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations, 1900-1920" (Ph.D. diss., Univ. Pennsylvania, 1987); Philip J. Pauly, Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1987); Jan Sapp, Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1987); Peter J. Bowler, The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900 (Balti- more/London: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1983); and William B. Provine, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics (Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press, 1971). 2 For a broader survey of opinions for and against the mutation theory see Garland E. Allen, "Hugo ISIS, 1991, 82: 479-509 479 This content downloaded from 128.128.250.98 on Fri, 19 May 2017 16:27:18 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 480 SHARON E. KINGSLAND the mutation theory from the perspective of a botanist working at a privately funded research laboratory, the Carnegie Institution of Washington's laboratory for plant physiology near Tucson, Arizona. Daniel Trembly MacDougal (1865- 1958) was a physiological ecologist who has been accorded a minor role in histo- ries of evolutionary biology. However, he was an eminent botanist, a vigorous agitator for the cause of experimentalism, and among the first to begin experi- ments in 1902 to validate de Vries's theory. MacDougal's campaign for the mu- tation theory highlights the agricultural context of botanical research and the entrepreneurial climate in which experimental programs evolved.3 Drawing upon Barbara Kimmelman's work in the history of agricultural genetics and extending her arguments to the sphere of evolutionary biology, I show how MacDougal worked to redefine the natural historian as engineer of life. In certain respects MacDougal's career has a parallel in the experimental, engineering approach of Jacques Loeb, which suggests a broader context in which we can place Philip Pauly's thesis about Loeb as begetter of a modern engineering approach to biol- ogy. This context is important for understanding the broad methodological conflict between American naturalists and experimentalists in the early twentieth cen- tury. The literature dealing with this conflict has had to respond to Garland Allen's initial description of this division as a "dichotomy," a term that suggested a binary classification of biologists into two sharply defined populations. At- tempts to probe this notion of a dichotomy have yielded a better grasp of the shifting definitions of natural history and experimentalism in this period, but anal- ysis tends to reach an impasse in debate over whether scientific change was revolutionary or evolutionary, or whether the dichotomy really existed.4 Freder- ick Churchill has suggested making a closer analysis of the institutional and na- tional context of this controversy as a way around this impasse. This article follows up his recommendation by setting one part of the dispute in the context of the professionalization of American botany, with special attention to the rise of new laboratories created by the Carnegie Institution shortly after its founding in December 1901.5 In following the intricate course of this controversy it is important to recognize that debates in evolutionary biology were conducted on three levels and for three de Vries and the Reception of the 'Mutation Theory,'" Journal of the History of Biology, 1969, 2:55-87. 3 For a discussion of professionalization in this period with more emphasis on the emergence of ecology as a new discipline see Joel B. Hagen, "Organism and Environment: Frederic Clements's Vision of a Unified Physiological Ecology," in The American Development of Biology, ed. Ronald Rainger, Keith R. Benson, and Jane Maienschein (Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press, 1988), pp. 257-277. ' See the symposium entitled "American Morphology at the Turn of the Century," J. Hist. Biol., 1981, 14:83-191; and Joel B. Hagen, "Experimentalists and Naturalists in Twentieth-Century Botany: Experimental Taxonomy, 1920-1950," J. Hist. Biol., 1984, 17:249-270. 5 Frederick B. Churchill, "In Search of the New Biology: An Epilogue," J. Hist. Biol., 1981, 14:177-191. A case study comparing two ecological programs that makes different use of Churchill's comments to refine the notion of a dichotomy is by Stephen Bocking, "Stephen Forbes, Jacob Reighard, and the Emergence of Aquatic Ecology in the Great Lakes Region," J. Hist. Biol., 1990, 23:461-498. This content downloaded from 128.128.250.98 on Fri, 19 May 2017 16:27:18 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BATTLING BOTANIST 481 audiences: scientists, patrons of science, and the general public. Therefore fig- ures of authority included individuals who, while not scientists, had the respect of patrons and the public. Here I show how both naturalists and experimentalists capitalized on the reputation of Luther Burbank, a private breeder, to advance their claims for authority in evolutionary biology. Their use of Burbank in this way must also be seen in the light of the Carnegie Institution's attempts to secure a place for itself as a patron of scientific research. MacDougal's fight to win recognition for experimental evidence in evolution- ary biology not only alienated naturalists, but also had negative repercussions on other experimentalists, some of whom were engaged in parallel struggles for au- thority. MacDougal's aggressiveness, which made experimentalists appear intol- erant of other approaches, prompted certain experimental zoologists to make conciliatory gestures toward biologists not engaged in experimental work. I illus- trate the relationship between overtly competitive and cooperative strategies by linking the controversy over the mutation theory, led by MacDougal, to biolo- gists' response to Wilhelm Johannsen's polemical address in support of Men- delism, given to an American audience in 1910. This connection enables me to refine Jan Sapp's analysis of how geneticists introduced terms such as genotype as part of a strategy designed to define the field of heredity in their favor.6 Sapp used Johannsen's address to highlight the aggressiveness with which geneticists tried to exclude all contending approaches to the study of heredity. I modify his analysis by showing that American geneticists, especially those in the Johannsen "school," actually considered the strategic value of dropping the word genotype altogether in 1912 because it had become too controversial.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Mary Jo Nye
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Linda Hahn for the degree of Master of Science in History of Science presented on February 4. 2000. Title: In the Midst of a Revolution: Science, Fish Culture and the Oregon Game Commission. 1935-1949. Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Mary Jo Nye This thesis will address the transformation of biological sciences during the 1930s and 1940s and it effects on fisheries science. It will focus on Oregon State College and specifically the Department of Fish and Game Management and the interaction with the Oregon Game Commission. Support for mutation theory and neo- Lamarckism lasted throughout this study's time frame. The resulting belief that the environment can directly affect species fitness could have been a factor in fisheries managers' support for fish hatcheries. Throughout this time frame the science of ecology was emerging, but the dominant science of agricultural breeding science within wildlife management took precedence over ecology. Two case studies show changing ideas about agricultural breeding science as applied to wildlife management. In the first case study, the debate concerning fishways over Bonneville Dam shows that fish hatcheries were counted on to mitigate the loss of salmon habitat due to construction, and to act as a failsafe should the fishways fail. When the 1934 Oregon Game Commission members failed to enthusiastically support the construction of the dam and the fishway plans, this thesis argues that the commission members were dismissed in 1935. The second case study addresses the actions of the Oregon Game Commission in placing some high dams on tributaries of the Willameue River, the Willamette Valley project.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Master Teachers Who Fostered American Turn-Of-The-(20<Sup>TH
    MYCOTAXON ISSN (print) 0093-4666 (online) 2154-8889 Mycotaxon, Ltd. ©2021 January–March 2021—Volume 136, pp. 1–58 https://doi.org/10.5248/136.1 Four master teachers who fostered American turn-of-the-(20TH)-century mycology and plant pathology Ronald H. Petersen Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37919-1100 Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—The Morrill Act of 1862 afforded the US states the opportunity to found state colleges with agriculture as part of their mission—the so-called “land-grant colleges.” The Hatch Act of 1887 gave the same opportunity for agricultural experiment stations as functions of the land-grant colleges, and the “third Morrill Act” (the Smith-Lever Act) of 1914 added an extension dimension to the experiment stations. Overall, the end of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th was a time for growing appreciation for, and growth of institutional education in the natural sciences, especially botany and its specialties, mycology, and phytopathology. This paper outlines a particular genealogy of mycologists and plant pathologists representative of this era. Professor Albert Nelson Prentiss, first of Michigan State then of Cornell, Professor William Russel Dudley of Cornell and Stanford, Professor Mason Blanchard Thomas of Wabash College, and Professor Herbert Hice Whetzel of Cornell Plant Pathology were major players in the scenario. The supporting cast, the students selected, trained, and guided by these men, was legion, a few of whom are briefly traced here. Key words—“New Botany,” European influence, agrarian roots Chapter 1. Introduction When Dr. Lexemual R.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear-Cutting Thrown Into Sharp Relief
    264 Clear-Cutting thrown into sharp relief. Nonetheless, the effect to a new tree species through planting or seeding; of the NPDES program is visible in the dramatic to provide forest habitat for species that rely upon recovery of Lake Erie water qua lity and fisheries, edge and high-density, even-aged stands; and to the improvement of previously dead rivers in the mimic the effects of large-scale, catastrophic wild­ industrial northeast, and the drive to develop the fires or hurricanes. technology that allows polluters to meet or exceed Conservationists, on the other hand, point to the required effluent reductions. detrimental effects of clear-cutting, since the prac­ tice can result in fragmented landscapes, landslides, SEE AL SO: Nutrients (as contaminants of water); Pollu­ increases in flamma ble "slash" left on forest floors, tion, Sewage and Sewer Systems; Total Maximum Daily watershed degradation, habitat degradation and Loads (TMDLs); Water; Water Law; Wetlands; Wetlands loss, soil erosion, soil temperature increases, aes­ Mitigation. thetic blight, species extinction, and loss of a forest's age and species diversity. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Robert Adler, Jessica Landman, and Diane Cameron, The Clean Water Act 20 Years Later DOMINANT METHOD OF LOGGING (Island Press, 1993); Robin Kundis Craig, Clean Water Act and the Constitution (Environmental Law Institute, Clear-cutting, while financially efficient, a useful 2004); Mark Ryan, The Clean Water Act Handbook management tool, and historically a standard prac­ (American Bar Association, 2004). tice, is often applied to forests that do not benefit from the practice. During the 1970s, it is estimated MORGAN ROBERTSON that clear-cutting took place on more than 250,000 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY acres each year, or an acre every two minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Research on Rust Fungi (Pucciniales) in India
    Asian Journal of Mycology 4(1): 40–80 (2021) ISSN 2651-1339 www.asianjournalofmycology.org Article Doi 10.5943/ajom/4/1/5 Current status of research on Rust fungi (Pucciniales) in India Gautam AK1, Avasthi S2, Verma RK3, Devadatha B 4, Sushma5, Ranadive KR 6, Bhadauria R2, Prasher IB7 and Kashyap PL8 1School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India 2School of Studies in Botany, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India 3Department of Plant Pathology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India 4 Fungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India 5Department of Biosciences, Chandigarh University Gharuan, Punjab, India 6Department of Botany, P.D.E.A.’s Annasaheb Magar Mahavidyalaya, Mahadevnagar, Hadapsar, Pune, Maharashtra, India 7Department of Botany, Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Panjab University Chandigarh, India 8ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, India Gautam AK, Avasthi S, Verma RK, Devadatha B, Sushma, Ranadive KR, Bhadauria R, Prasher IB, Kashyap PL 2021 – Current status of research on Rust fungi (Pucciniales) in India. Asian Journal of Mycology 4(1), 40–80, Doi 10.5943/ajom/4/1/5 Abstract Rust fungi show unique systematic characteristics among all fungal groups. A single species of rust fungi may produce up to five morphologically and cytologically distinct spore-producing structures thereby attracting the interest of mycologist for centuries. In India, the research on rust fungi started with the arrival of foreign visiting scientists or emigrant experts, mainly from Britain who collected fungi and sent specimens to European laboratories for identification. Later on, a number of mycologists from India and abroad studied Indian rust fungi and contributed a lot to knowledge of the rusts to the Indian Mycobiota.
    [Show full text]
  • Holway Collection
    Holway Collection This is a list of the books and journals contained in the Holway Collection which is held in the University of Minnesota Herbarium. The collection was donated by Prof. E. W. D. Holway (1853-1923) along with 10,000 specimens collected in the United States, Canada, and Central and South America. ·:'%.:' ..7"~}t~~~~~;T:,,~·ex;."(V ~~.·~·~·.. -..:· ··:r • S~'T l'1'7<~ HOLWAY COLLECTION. .., .... UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LIBRARY • .. XB580 Adl Adanson, Michel, 1727-1806. Familles des plantes... Paris, 1763. 2v. XB589.2 f Af9 Afz·elius, Adam, 1750-1837. Reliquiae Afzelianae, sistentes icones fungorwn quos in Guinea collegit et in aere incisas excudi curavit Adamus Afzelius. Interpretatur E. Fries. Upsaliae, 1860. XB589 .2 Al 1 Albertini, Johann Baptist von, 1769-1831. Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae Superioris agro fungorum in Lusatiae Superioris ~gro niskiensi crescentium. E.methodo Persooniana ... Auctoribus I.B. de Albertini, L.D. de Schweiniz. Lipsiae, 1805. XB581.97 Am3 American association for the advancement of science. Botanical club. List of pteridophyta and spermatophyta growing without cultivation in northeastern North America. Prepared by~ a committee of the Botanical club, American association for the advancement of science ... New York, 1893-1894. X473 qA.n2 Andrews, Ethan Allen, 1787-1858. · Harpers• Latin dictionary ... New York, 1879. XB589.225 Ax7 Arthur, Joseph Charles, 1850- Description of American Uredineae, Ic-IVJ By J. C. Arthur and E. W. D. Holway. 4v. in 1. With this is bound his: The grass rusts of South America; based on the Holway collections. 1925. XB581 Ax7 Arthur, Joseph Charles, 1850- Living pla.~ts and their properties; a collection of essays, by Joseph Charles Arthur ..
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy Of
    PROCEEDINGS of the Indiana Academy of Science Founded December 29, 1885 • Volume 83 1978 Marion T. Jackson, Editor Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana Spring Meeting May 11-12, 1973 Brown County State Park, Nashville, Indiana Fall Meeting October 26-27, 1973 Indiana Central College, Indianapolis, Indiana Published at Indianapolis, Indiana 1974 PROCEEDINGS of the Indiana Academy of Science Founded December 29, 1885 Volume 83 1973 Marion T. Jackson, Editor Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana Spring Meeting May 11-12, 1973 Brown County State Park, Nashville, Indiana Fall Meeting October 26-27, 1973 Indiana Central College, Indianapolis, Indiana Published at Indianapolis, Indiana 1974 1. The permanent address of the Academy is the Indiana State Library, 140 N. Senate Ave., Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. 2. Instructions for Contributors appear at the end of this volume, p. 485-486. 3. Exchanges. Items sent in exchange for the Proceedings and correspondence con- cerning exchange arrangements should be addressed: John Shepard Wright Memorial Library of the Indiana Academy of Science c/o Indiana State Library Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 4. Proceedings may be purchased through the State Library at $7.00 per volume. 5. Reprints of technical papers can often be secured from the authors. They cannot be supplied by the State Library nor by the officers of the Academy. 6. The Constitution and By-Laws reprinted from Vol. 74 are available to members upon application to the Secretary. Necrologies reprinted from the various volumes can be supplied to relatives and friends of deceased members by the Secretary. 7. Officers whose names and addresses are not known to correspondents may be addressed care of the State Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Plant Drosophila”: E. B. Babcock, the Genus Crepis, and the Evolution of a Genetics Research Program at Berkeley, 1915–1947
    HSNS3903_02 6/26/09 11:04 AM Page 300 ∗ VASSILIKI BETTY SMOCOVITIS The “Plant Drosophila”: E. B. Babcock, the Genus Crepis, and the Evolution of a Genetics Research Program at Berkeley, 1915–1947 The student of genetics must be ready to resort to the use of any living organism that gives promise of revealing the natural laws upon which the future science of breeding will be grounded. E. B. Babcock, 19131 The Crepis investigations carried on by the Babcock group are the American evolutionary investigations that seem to have attracted the largest attention outside of America next to the Drosophila investigations. One reason for this is their wider systematical aspect. Jens Clausen, 19342 *Departments of Zoology and History, Affiliate in Botany, University of Florida, Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611; [email protected]fl.edu, [email protected]fl.edu. The following abbreviations are used: APS, American Philosophical Society Library, Philadel- phia, PA; CAS, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA; CIW, Carnegie Institution of Washington; CP, Carnegie Papers, Missouri Botanical Garden Archives, St. Louis, MO; EBB, Ernest Brown Babcock Papers, TBL; JHB, Journal of the History of Biology; JAJ, James Angus Jenkins Papers, TBL; RG, Rockefeller Foundation Archives, Sleepy Hollow, NY, http://www.rockarch.org/collections/rf/; TBL, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley; UC, University of California; UCGD, University of California, Berkeley, Genetics Department, APS. Interviews with G. Ledyard Stebbins are transcribed and in the author’s possession. 1. “Division of Genetics: Report to the Director of the Experiment Station, 11 June 1913,” EBB, Folder The Division of Genetics of the Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Ecology from Natural History Keith R
    The emergence of ecology from natural history Keith R. Benson The modern discipline of biology was formed in the 20th century from roots deep in the natural-history tradition, which dates from Aristotle. Not surprisingly, therefore, ecology can also be traced to natural history, especially its 19th-century tradition emphasizing the adaptive nature of organisms to their environment. During the 20th century, ecology has developed and matured from pioneering work on successional stages to mathematically rich work on ecosystem energetics. By the end of the century, ecology has made a return to its natural-history heritage, emphasizing the importance of the integrity of ecosystems in considering human interactions with the environment. Today, the field of biology includes a vast array of diver- like molecular biology, ecology emerged as a distinct gent and unique subdisciplines, ranging from molecular area in biology only at the turn of the century but very biology to comparative endocrinology. With very few quickly developed its own conventions of biological exceptions, most of these specialty areas were created by discourse. Unlike molecular biology and several other biologists during the 20th century, giving modern biology biological subsciplines, ecology’s roots are buried deep its distinctive and exciting character1. However, before within natural history, the descriptive and often romantic 1900, the field was much different because even the term tradition of studying the productions of nature. biology was seldom used2. Indeed, most of those who studied the plants and animals scattered over the earth’s Perspectives on the natural world before the surface referred to themselves as naturalists: students of 20th century natural history3.
    [Show full text]
  • Application to the USDA-ARS LONG-TERM AGRO-ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH (LTAR) NETWORK to ESTABLISH the PLATTE RIVER – HIGH PLAINS AQUIF
    Application to the USDA-ARS LONG-TERM AGRO-ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH (LTAR) NETWORK TO ESTABLISH THE PLATTE RIVER – HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER LTAR CONTACT INFORMATION: Brian Wienhold, Research Leader Tala Awada, Interim Director and Agro-ecosystem Management Research Unit Professor ARS-USDA School of Natural Resources 137 Keim Hall, East Campus University of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Nebraska-Lincoln 904 Hardin Hall, East Campus Lincoln, NE 68583 University of Nebraska-Lincoln Phone: 402-472-1484 Lincoln, NE 68583 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 402-472-0232 E-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page Table of Contents List of Acronyms Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Goal and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 1 Overview of the High Plains Aquifer and Need for the Proposed LTAR Site ............... 1-3 Productivity ......................................................................................................................... 3-7 Partners and Participating Research Units ..................................................................... 3-5 Leadership Team ............................................................................................................ 5 Research Clusters ........................................................................................................... 5-7 Infrastructure Capacity .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Special Committee on Publications Using a Largely Mechanical Method of Selection of Types (Art
    TAXON 65 (6) • December 2016: 1443–1448 Special Committee on Largely Mechanical Type Selection • Report Report of the Special Committee on Publications Using a Largely Mechanical Method of Selection of Types (Art. 10.5(b)) (especially under the American Code) Members of the Special Committee: John McNeill (Convener),1 Fred R. Barrie (Secretary),2 Kanchi N. Gandhi,3 Victoria C. Hollowell,4 Scott A. Redhead,5 Lars Söderström6 & James L. Zarucchi7 1 Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, U.K. 2 Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, Saint Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A.; Herbarium, Botany Department, Department of Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496, U.S.A. 3 Herbaria, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2020, U.S.A. 4 1753 Folkstone Drive, Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, U.S.A. 5 Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0C6 6 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway 7 Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, Saint Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: John McNeill, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/656.32 Abstract The Special Committee on Publications Using a Largely Mechanical Method of Selection of Types (Art. 10.5(b)) (especially under the American Code) was established at the XVIII International Botanical Congress (IBC) in Melbourne in 2011, with the man- date to develop a list of works that are deemed to have followed the American Code and any similar cases in which the method of type selection is “considered to be largely mechanical”.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Concepts in Plant Ecology: from Humboldtian Plant Geography to the Superorganism and Beyond
    Nicolson, M. (2013) Community concepts in plant ecology: from Humboldtian plant geography to the superorganism and beyond. Web Ecology, 13. pp. 95-102. ISSN 2193-3081 Copyright © 2013 The Author http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/92864 Deposited on: 01 April 2014 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Web Ecol., 13, 95–102, 2013 www.web-ecol.net/13/95/2013/ doi:10.5194/we-13-95-2013 © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Open Access Open Web Ecology Community concepts in plant ecology: from Humboldtian plant geography to the superorganism and beyond M. Nicolson Centre for the History of Medicine, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RT, UK Correspondence to: M. Nicolson ([email protected]) Received: 12 March 2013 – Revised: 7 November 2013 – Accepted: 21 November 2013 – Published: 13 December 2013 Abstract. The paper seeks to provide an introduction to, and review of, the history of concepts of the plant community. Eighteenth-century naturalists recognised that vegetation was distributed geographically and that different species of plants and animals were interconnected in what would later be called ecological relation- ships. It was not, however, until the early nineteenth century that the study of vegetation became a distinctive and autonomous form of scientific inquiry. Humboldt was the first to call communities of plants “associa- tions”. His programme for the empirical study of plant communities was extended by many European and North American botanists, throughout the nineteenth and into the twentieth century. There developed an al- most complete consensus among ecologists that vegetation was made up of natural communities, discrete entities with real boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Arthur Herbarium Centennial: 100 Years of Uredinology in Indiana and the Great Lakes Region John W. McCain and Joe F. Hennen The Arthur Herbarium, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 In January, 1883, Dr. J. C. Arthur published his first manuscript on uredinology, the study of the taxonomy and biology of the rust fungi, the Uredinales. This we take as the starting date for the Arthur Herbarium. Because the Arthur Herbarium (PUR), now at Purdue University in West Lafayette, In- diana, has now for 100 years been the major site in the United States, and possibly the world, for taxonomic studies of these important plant pathogens, a review of the history of Indiana Uredinology is in order. Parts of Dr. Arthur's story have been published before (11, 16, 17, 19, 24, 30), so new information was sought for this report. The Arthur Herbarium is in its centennial year, but rust collecting in In- diana began more than 100 years ago. Jackson (23) credited the first explicit report of a rust fungus in Indiana to Dr. John M. Coulter in 1876, who found a rust on Lespedeza violacea (L.) Pers. (bush clover: Leguminosae), presumably near Hanover. Because there was then no Arthur Herbarium, Coulter sent the rust specimen to Dr. Charles H. Peck, New York State Museum at Albany, for iden- tification. Peck indentified the fungus as Uromyces lespedezae-procumbentis (Schw.) Curtis, then called U. lespedezae-violaceae Schw., but added, "... inasmuch as the name is objectionable both because of its com- pound character and because of it implied limitation of the habitat of the fungus, which occurs on the leaves of all of our species of Lespedeza, it seems best to .
    [Show full text]