Municipality of Swakopmund Structure Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Municipality of Swakopmund Structure Plan 2020-2040 Municipality of Swakopmund Structure Plan DRAFT SWAKOPMUND STRUCTURE PLAN 2020 -2040 0 ____________________________________ Municipality of Swakopmund Structure Plan 2020-2040 I, ………………………………………… in my capacity as ……………………………………… herewith declare that, the Swakopmund Structure Plan was approved and adopted by the Swakopmund Municipal Council vide Resolution ………………….. of 19………. Signed at ……………………………………………….. this ………… day of ……………………………………… 2020. _____________________ (CEO: Swakopmund Municipality) In …………………………. 2020 Electronic copies of the document were provided to the following: a) Ministry of Urban and Rural Development (MURD) b) Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) c) Ministry of Land Reform (MLR) d) Roads Authority (RA) e) NamPower f) NamWater g) TransNamib DRAFT SWAKOPMUND STRUCTURE PLAN 2020 -2040 1 2.2.8. Community facilities ............................................................ 26 3.8.16 Stability and resilience ........................................................ 58 Table of Contents 2.2.9. Conservation ........................................................................ 27 3.8.17 other informants ................................................................. 59 Foreword.............................................................................. 5 2.3 Urban settlement analyses (SPC/WHUDA/Lithon) ...................29 3.9 Mining claims............................................................... 60 Acknowledgements ............................................................... 6 2.3.1. Spatial land use analysis....................................................... 29 Chapter 4: Problem Statement ................................................. 64 Executive Summary ............................................................... 7 2.3.2. Disparity between communities .......................................... 30 Section II: Planning Policies and Proposals ...................................... 71 Acronyms and Abbreviations.................................................. 8 2.4 Infrastructure (Status quo) ...............................................30 Chapter 5: Spatial Vision and development proposals ..................... 72 Glossary of Terms.................................................................. 8 2.4.1. Transportation and road network........................................ 30 5.1 The vision: “Creating a sustainable, livable and inclusive city at the human scale” ................................................................... 72 Section I: Background Information and Analysis ............................... 10 2.4.2. Water Infrastructure ............................................................ 34 5.1.1 The Sustainable City .............................................................. 72 Chapter 1: General Background................................................ 11 Chapter 3: Planning informants ................................................ 45 5.1.2 The Livable City ..................................................................... 72 1.1 Introduction .................................................................11 3.1 Statutory framework ......................................................45 5.1.3 The Inclusive City .................................................................. 72 1.1.1. Objective of a Structure Plan................................................ 11 3.1.1. Namibian National Plans ...................................................... 45 5.1.3 The Human Scale City ........................................................... 72 1.1.2. Rationales for the formulation of the structure plan ........... 11 3.1.2. Swakopmund institutional and regulatory framework ........ 46 5.2 General Building Designs and Guidelines ............................. 74 1.1.3. Planning Approach ............................................................... 13 3.2 The aim and objective of the Swakopmund Structure Plan ........49 5.3 Descriptions of urban design principles ............................... 74 1.1.4. Methodology and Project timeline ...................................... 14 3.3 Cost of current housing strategies ......................................50 5.4 Building lines/coverage/bulk (erf-usage) for all land uses as 1.1.5. Document structure ............................................................. 15 3.4 The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) .................................50 described individually below ................................................. 74 1.2 Functions of Swakopmund ...............................................15 3.5 Economy and investments ...............................................50 5.5 Overall land development objectives and development zones ... 75 1.2.1. Historic overview and origin of town ................................... 15 3.6 Planned and ongoing developments ...................................51 5.5.1 Development objectives for Swakopmund: .......................... 75 1.2.2. Role of Swakopmund within the national and regional 3.7 Basic assumptions ..........................................................51 5.5.2 Development zones (Precints): ............................................. 75 framework...................................................................................... 16 3.8 Natural Environmental factors ...........................................51 Chapter 6: Spatial Strategies .................................................... 76 1.2.3. Physical settings of Swakopmund ........................................ 17 3.8.1. Climate ................................................................................. 51 6.1 Transportation systems .................................................. 76 1.3. Swakopmund Townlands boundary....................................17 3.8.2. Precipitation......................................................................... 52 6.1.1 Airport ................................................................................... 76 1.4. Socio-economic drivers of Swakopmund .............................19 3.8.3. Wind..................................................................................... 52 6.1.2 Rail ........................................................................................ 78 1.5. Geography ..................................................................19 3.8.4. Geomorphology, Topography and drainage ........................ 52 6.1.3 Road systems ........................................................................ 79 Chapter 2: Demographic ........................................................ 20 3.8.5. Biodiversity .......................................................................... 54 6.2 Commercial and business ................................................ 81 2.1 Population statistics .......................................................20 3.8.6 The Dorob National Park ....................................................... 54 6.2.1 Large scale mixed-use developments ................................... 82 2.1.1. Employment patterns and income....................................... 22 3.8.7 The Coastline ........................................................................ 55 6.2.2 Small scale mixed use provisions – (i.e. Shop house and House 2.2 Spatial characteristics .....................................................22 3.8.8 The Swakop River .................................................................. 55 shop) .............................................................................................. 83 2.2.1. Industry ................................................................................ 22 3.8.9 Bird Areas.............................................................................. 56 6.3 Residential .................................................................. 87 2.2.2. Economy and Commerce ..................................................... 23 3.8.10 Lichen Fields........................................................................ 56 6.4 Housing Typologies........................................................ 87 2.2.3. Housing ................................................................................ 23 3.8.11 The small-holdings .............................................................. 57 6.5 Public institutions, social services and facilities ...................... 89 2.2.4. Education ............................................................................. 24 3.8.12 Existing Public Open Spaces, Sport Fields and Green Areas 57 6.5.1 Tertiary Institution Site ......................................................... 89 2.2.5. Health ................................................................................... 24 3.8..13 Corridors and connectivity ................................................. 57 6.5.2 Central Tertiary Development .............................................. 89 2.2.6. Heritage................................................................................ 25 3.8.14 Visual features .................................................................... 58 6.5.3 Schools and other institutions .............................................. 89 2.2.7. Tourism, Leisure and recreation .......................................... 25 3.8.15 Waste management and landfill ......................................... 58 6.6 Industries ................................................................... 89 DRAFT SWAKOPMUND STRUCTURE PLAN 2020 -2040 2 6.7 Conservation, heritage and cultural sites ..............................90
Recommended publications
  • Entdecker, Missionare Und Händler 13 • Europäische Kolonialpolitik 15
    EINLEITUNG 9 I. LAND UND LEUTE II Geschichtlicher Überblick 11 Vorkoloniale Zeit 11 Kolonialzeit 13 Entdecker, Missionare und Händler 13 • Europäische Kolonialpolitik 15 Namibia unter dem Mandat Südafrikas 19 Der Weg zur Unabhängigkeit 20 Namibia nach der Unabhängigkeit 23 Problem der Landfrage 23 • Fortschritte und Ruckschlage 24 Geografischer Überblick 28 Das Relief 29 Klima 31 Wasservorkommen und moderne Wasserwirtschaft 35 Flora und Fauna 37 Natur- und Tierschutz 40 Wirtschaftlicher Überblick 42 Bergbau und Lagerstätten 44 Landwirtschaft 47 Großtierhaltung 48 • Wildtierhaltung 49 • Schafhaltung 50 • Regenfeldbau 50 • Bewässerungskulturen 51 Fischerei 52 Tourismus - ein Entwicklungsfaktor 54 Städte und Zentren 57 Bildungswesen 60 Bevölkerung 62 Verteilung, Strukturen und Mobilität 62 Ovambo 64 • Kavango 65 • Damara 66 ■ Herero 67 • Nama 68 • Caprivianer 69 • San 70 • Rehobother Baster 72 ■ Himba 72 Sprachenvielfalt 74 Der deutsche Einfluss in Namibia 76 2. NAMIBIA ALS REISELAND 78 Allgemeine Reisetipps A-Z 79 Das kostet Sie das Reisen in Namibia 126 REISEROUTEN DURCH NAMIBIA 129 1. Klassische große Namibia-Rundfahrt - 22 Tage 130 2. Rundfahrt durch den Norden Namibias 133 3. Rundfahrt durch den Süden Namibias 134 4. Fahrt von Windhoek durch den Caprivi-Streifen nach Victoria Falls 136 3. ZENTRAL-NAMIBIA: WINDHOEK UND UMGEBUNG 138 Windhoek 139 Redaktionstipps 140 Überblick 140 Stadtrundgang 146 Windhoeks Burgen 151 ■ Independence Avenue 152 • Heldenacker (Heroes’ Acre) 154 Ziele in der Umgebung von Windhoek 173 Daan-Viljoen-Wildpark 173 • Gross Barmen Resort 174 • Arnhem Cave 174 Weiterreise-Möglichkeiten ab Windhoek 176 Windhoek - Hardap-Damm 177 Sehenswertes unterwegs 179 Rehoboth 179 • Tropic of Capricorn (Wendekreis des Steinbocks) 182 • Hardap-Damm 182 Weiter in den Süden: Hardap-Damm - Köcherbaumwald - Keetmanshoop 186 Mariental 186 • Brukkaros 189 Köcherbaumwald 190 Keetmanshoop 192 4.
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR Briefing Paper NO 44 Political Party Life in Namibia
    Institute for Public Policy Research Political Party Life in Namibia: Dominant Party with Democratic Consolidation * Briefing Paper No. 44, February 2009 By André du Pisani and William A. Lindeke Abstract This paper assesses the established dominant-party system in Namibia since independence. Despite the proliferation of parties and changes in personalities at the top, three features have structured this system: 1) the extended independence honeymoon that benefits and is sustained by the ruling SWAPO Party of Namibia, 2) the relatively effective governance of Namibia by the ruling party, and 3) the policy choices and political behaviours of both the ruling and opposition politicians. The paper was funded in part by the Danish government through Wits University in an as yet unpublished form. This version will soon be published by Praeger Publishers in the USA under Series Editor Kay Lawson. “...an emergent literature on African party systems points to low levels of party institutionalization, high levels of electoral volatility, and the revival of dominant parties.” 1 Introduction Political reform, democracy, and governance are centre stage in Africa at present. African analysts frequently point to the foreign nature of modern party systems compared to the pre-colonial political cultures that partially survive in the traditional arenas especially of rural politics. However, over the past two decades multi-party elections became the clarion call by civil society (not to mention international forces) for the reintroduction of democratic political systems. This reinvigoration of reform peaked just as Namibia gained its independence under provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978) and the supervision of the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • Dnegbericht05
    JAHRESBERICHT 2005 Die Gqaina-Schule wächst: Tanz zur Einweihung Sitz der Gesellschaft: Amorbach Vereinsregister AG Obernburg VR 428 Büro Amorbach Büro Berlin Büro Potsdam Pfarrgasse 12 Neue Promenade 8 Eisenhartstraße 8 63916 Amorbach 10178 Berlin 14469 Potsdam Telefon: 09373 / 4272 Telefon: 030 / 280 96 250 Telefon: 0331 / 740 38 88 Telefax: 09373 / 4206 Telefax: 089 / 92 185 285 Telefax: 0331 / 740 38 89 www.dneg.de [email protected] [email protected] Vorstand Siegfried K. Grammel Präsident Dirk Rogge Vizepräsident Peter Schneider Vizepräsident Frode Hobbelhagen Schatzmeister und Geschäftsführer Dr. Hubertus Hausburg Ehrenpräsident Erweiterter Vorstand Margarete Sartorius Ehrenmitglied Wolfgang Reith Dr. Matthias Schenzle Dr. Volker Stoltz Dr. Matthias Traulsen ! "# ! $ % & & ' ()*+") $ %, -+) .// // 0 (12 & 3' 4 /+*-*(5#-# ( )#/ *"" /./ ( ")/+ /"+ ".) ! 4 6 /+*-*(5#/) 222 G E R M A N – N A M I B I A N D E V E L O P M E N T C O M P A N Y (Incorporated Association not for Gain -- Reg.No. 21/87/219) German-Namibian Development Company Geschäftsstelle Postfach 11758 Windhoek Namibia Telefon: 00264-81-244 88 10 Telefax: 00264-61-22 88 12 E-Mail: [email protected] Vorstand Hans-Erik Staby Präsident Klaus von Klitzing Schatzmeister und Geschäftsführer Weitere Vorstandsmitglieder Niko Brückner Raimar von Hase Erika Stier 3 Inhalt Die Ziele der DNEG.............................................................................................................................4 Vorwort und Bericht des Präsidenten...................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Skeleton Coast National Park 2013
    Management Plan Skeleton Coast National Park September 2013 Republic of Namibia Ministry of Environment and Tourism Author: MET Ministry of Environment and Tourism Troskie House, Uhland Street P/Bag 13346, Windhoek Tel: (+264 61) 284 2111 Directorate of Regional Services and Park Management PZN Building, Northern Industria P/Bag 13306, Windhoek Tel: (+264 61) 284 2518 © MET 2013 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-cormmercial purposes without prior permission from the copyright holder is authorized, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes without prior written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited. Cover Photo: FOREWORD National parks are a vital tool for conserving Namibia’s essential biodiversity. By managing parks, their irreplaceable assets and unlimited potential will be conserved for future generations. In addition, every year Namibia’s National Parks draw large numbers of tourists, generating employment and stimulating development nationwide. National Parks also provide unique opportunities to benefit local communities through rural development while providing research, education and recreation opportunities. One of the protected areas in Namibia is the Skeleton Coast National Park. The name Skeleton Coast suggests a dramatic history and difficult conditions for human survival. These qualities make the park an attractive destination for eco-tourists. Similarly, its fine angling reputation attracts large numbers of fishermen from southern Africa and elsewhere. Altogether it is an area of international significance, set within a larger transboundary landscape that covers the length of the Namib Desert. This management plan sets out the objectives and guidelines for the management and development of the Skeleton Coast National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • PISC ES Env Ir Onmental Serv Ices (Pt Y) Lt D Namparks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR A CONTAINERISED DESALINATION PLANT AT THE CAPE CROSS RESERVE MARINE ECOLOGY SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT Prepared for SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd On behalf of Lund Consulting Engineers Prepared by Andrea Pulfrich September 2020 PISC ES Env ir onmental Serv ices (Pt y) Lt d NamParks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant OWNERSHIP OF REPORTS AND COPYRIGHTS © 2020 Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document is the property of the author. The information, ideas and structure are subject to the copyright laws or statutes of South Africa and may not be reproduced in part or in whole, or disclosed to a third party, without prior written permission of the author. Copyright in all documents, drawings and records, whether produced manually or electronically, that form part of this report shall vest in Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. None of the documents, drawings or records may be used or applied in any manner, nor may they be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever for or to any other person, without the prior written consent of Pisces, except when they are reproduced for purposes of the report objectives as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd. Andrea Pulfrich Pisces Environmental Services PO Box 302, McGregor 6708, South Africa, Tel: +27 21 782 9553 E-mail: [email protected] Website:
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011
    ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Walvis Bay Baseline Study *Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011 *IDRC Project Number-Component Number: 105868-001 *IDRC Project Title: Sub-Saharan African Cities: A Five-City Network to Pioneer Climate Adaptation through Participatory Research and Local Action. *Country/Region: Namibia, South Africa, Mozambique, Tanzania, Mauritius *Full Name of Research Institution: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Address of Research Institution: P.O. Box 5319, Tygervalley, 7536, Cape Town, South Africa *Name(s) of ICLEI Africa Core Project Team: Lucinda Fairhurst and Priscilla Rowswell *Contact Information of Researcher/Research Team members: [email protected]; +27 21 487 2312 *This report is presented as received from project recipient(s). It has not been subjected to peer review or other review processes. *This work is used with the permission of ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Copyright: 2012, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Abstract: This project addresses knowledge, resource, capacity and networking gaps on the theme: 'Strengthening urban governments in planning adaptation.' The main objective of this project is to develop an adaptation framework for managing the increased risk to African local government and their communities due to climate change impact. The ultimate beneficiaries of this project will be African local governments and their communities. The guiding and well-tested ICLEI principle of locally designed and owned projects for the global common good, specifically in a developing world context, will be applied throughout project design, inception and delivery. Additionally, the research will test the theory that the most vulnerable living and working in different geographical, climatic and ecosystem zones will be impacted differently and as such, will require a different set of actions to be taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Starline Timetable
    TRAIN : WINDHOEK – GOBABIS – WINDHOEK TRAIN : WINDHOEK – OTJIWARONGO – WINDHOEK TRAIN NO 9903 TRAIN NO 9904 TRAIN NO 9966 TRAIN NO 9915 TIMETABLE DAYS MON, DAYS MON, MONDAYS MONDAY WED, FRI WED, FRI WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Windhoek D 05:50 Gobabis D 14:50 Windhoek D 15:45 Otjiwarongo D 15:40 Hoffnung D 06:55 Witvlei D 16:14 Okahandja A 18:00 Omaruru A 18:30 Neudamm D 07:35 Omitara A 17:52 D 18:05 D 19:30 Omitara A 10:10 D 17:56 Karibib D 20:40 Kranzberg A 21:10 D 10:12 Neudamm D 20:36 Kranzberg A 21:20 D 21:50 Witvlei D 11:53 Hoffnung D 21:18 D 21:40 Karibib D 22:20 Gobabis A 13:25 Windhoek A 22:25 Omaruru A 23:00 Okahandja A 01:30 D 23:35 D 01:40 Otjiwarongo A 02:20 Windhoek A 03:20 TRAIN : WINDHOEK – WALVIS BAY – WINDHOEK TRAIN: WALVIS BAY–OTJIWARONGO–WALVIS BAY EFFECTIVE FROM TRAIN NO 9908 TRAIN NO 9909 TRAIN NO 9901 / 9912 TRAIN NO 9907 / 9900 DAYS DAILY DAYS DAILY MONDAY MONDAY MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2008 EXCEPT EXCEPT WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY SAT SAT FRIDAY FRIDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Business Hours : Windhoek Central Reservations : Monday – Friday 07:00 to 19:00 Tel. (061) 298 2032/2175 Windhoek D 19:55 Walvis Bay D 19:00 Otjiwarongo D 14:40 Walvis Bay D 14:20 Saturdays 07:00 to 09:30 Fax (061) 298 2495 Okahandja A 21:55 Kuiseb D 19:20 Omaruru A 17:30 Kuiseb D 14:30 Sundays 15:30 to 19:00 D 22:05 Swakopmund A 20:35 D 18:30 Swakopmund A 15:50 Website : www.transnamib.com.na Karibib D 00:40 D 20:45 Kranzberg A 19:55 D 16:00 StarLine Information : E-mail : [email protected] Kranzberg
    [Show full text]
  • Kumba Resources Namibia
    ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES OF BANNERMAN MINING RESOURCES (NAMIBIA) (PTY) LTD ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE 3345 AUGUST 2020 Compiled for: Bannerman Mining Resources (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2854 Swakopmund Compiled by: A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc / SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd P O Box 40386 Windhoek EO /EMP for Bannerman Mining Resources exploration activities on EPL 3345 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 2 LOCATION OF EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE ............................................ 4 2.1 Historical exploration areas ....................................................................................... 5 3 EXPLORATION AND REHABILITATION ................................................................... 8 3.1 Day to day activities ................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Rehabilitation of Moon landscape and viewpoints................................................... 9 4 PURPOSE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ................... 10 5 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 11 5.1 Permits ...................................................................................................................... 12 6 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................... 12 6.1
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River Catchment with Respect to Geogenic Background Concentrations of Dissolved Uranium
    Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Hannover, July 2010 Commissioned by: i Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Commissioned by: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, BMZ) Project: Human Resources Development for the Geological Survey of Namibia, Engineering & Environmental Geology Subdivision BMZ-No.: 2008.2007.6 BGR-No.: 05-2332 BGR-Archive No.: 0129666 Date: July 2010 ii Summary Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Title: Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop-River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Keywords: ephemeral river, geogenic background, groundwater, mine discharge, Namibia, uranium In 2009, 78 locations were sampled in the catchment areas of the ephemeral Swakop River and the tributary Khan River within the framework of a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) prior to new uranium mining activities. Samples were analysed for main components, dissolved uranium, and trace elements. Alluvial groundwater in the upper Khan and Swakop River catchments is freshwater of drinking water quality, whereas groundwater in the lower river catchment is saline. Nitrate concentrations are elevated yet below the WHO guideline value apart from a few exceptions. Potentially toxic trace element concentrations are without critical implications for drinking water quality. Drinking water samples from the municipalities of Swakopmund and Walvis Bay meet the requirements of the Namibian and the WHO drinking water standards. Process and seepage water samples from uranium mines have elevated concentrations of uranium, arsenic and fluoride, manganese and a number of other trace elements like lithium, nickel and cobalt.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Cross Salt Mining
    ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE EPL4185 AT WLOTZKASBAKEN January 2013 Prepared by: Gecko Namibia (Pty) Ltd Gecko House 8 Sinclair Road Windhoek, Namibia Reviewed by: Nam Enviro Management and Training Services cc Mutjinde Katjiua SUMMARY Gecko Namibia (Pty) Ltd, in the name of its subsidiary Gecko Salt (Pty) Ltd holds EPL4185 which covers 75,335 hectares of coastal desert plains from north of Swakopmund to just south of the Henties Bay peri-urban area. Gecko intends to establish the “Vision Industrial Park” and harbour within the area. The development will require a large amount of fine and coarse aggregate material as well as armour stone for the construction of a breakwater facility. Besides the envisaged VIP development, Gecko is in the process of exploring a number of high-grade marble occurrences on this EPL. As part of the EPL4185 falls within the Dorob National Park, Gecko is submitting this EIA together with Environmental Questionnaires and other prescribed documentation in application for an Environmental Clearance Certificate under the Environmental Management Act of 2007. The company has drawn up an Environmental Management Plan for the prospecting operations and is currently in the process of implementing those measures. Management and exterior control on the adherence of the proposed mitigation actions are considered important tools in preventing negative environmental impacts from the operations. Activities during the exploration phase include sampling, testing and exploratory drilling. The activities are temporary and are conducted at a small scale than those at the drilling/development, production, and decommissioning/reclamation phases.
    [Show full text]