DOCSLIB.ORG

Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River Catchment with Respect to Geogenic Background Concentrations of Dissolved Uranium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River Catchment with Respect to Geogenic Background Concentrations of Dissolved Uranium Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Hannover, July 2010 Commissioned by: i Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Commissioned by: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, BMZ) Project: Human Resources Development for the Geological Survey of Namibia, Engineering & Environmental Geology Subdivision BMZ-No.: 2008.2007.6 BGR-No.: 05-2332 BGR-Archive No.: 0129666 Date: July 2010 ii Summary Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Title: Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop-River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Keywords: ephemeral river, geogenic background, groundwater, mine discharge, Namibia, uranium In 2009, 78 locations were sampled in the catchment areas of the ephemeral Swakop River and the tributary Khan River within the framework of a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) prior to new uranium mining activities. Samples were analysed for main components, dissolved uranium, and trace elements. Alluvial groundwater in the upper Khan and Swakop River catchments is freshwater of drinking water quality, whereas groundwater in the lower river catchment is saline. Nitrate concentrations are elevated yet below the WHO guideline value apart from a few exceptions. Potentially toxic trace element concentrations are without critical implications for drinking water quality. Drinking water samples from the municipalities of Swakopmund and Walvis Bay meet the requirements of the Namibian and the WHO drinking water standards. Process and seepage water samples from uranium mines have elevated concentrations of uranium, arsenic and fluoride, manganese and a number of other trace elements like lithium, nickel and cobalt. Uranium is a common trace element in the groundwater of the catchment and mostly present at elevated concentrations. Only 21 % of analysed groundwater samples have uranium concentrations below the provisional WHO guideline value of 15 µg/L. Six groundwater samples in the vicinity of the Rössing and Langer Heinrich Uranium Mines and the lower Swakop River Valley have uranium concentrations above the regional background level. The chemical composition of water samples alone is insufficient and inconclusive to identify the source for the high uranium level in the respective groundwater samples. iii Table of Contents 1 Background................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Sampling campaign................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Analysis................................................................................................................................... 7 4 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Main components and parameters.......................................................................................... 9 4.1.1 Water temperature ........................................................................................................... 9 4.1.2 Electrical Conductivity (EC)..............................................................................................9 4.1.3 Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) .......................................................................................11 4.1.4 Cations and anions ........................................................................................................12 4.1.5 Redox conditions............................................................................................................ 18 4.2 Trace elements...................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Uranium.......................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Other trace elements of concern.................................................................................... 23 4.3 Classification of water types.................................................................................................. 24 4.3.1 Process water ................................................................................................................ 24 4.3.2 Drinking water samples.................................................................................................. 26 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 28 6 Extended summary ...................................................................................................................... 31 7 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 32 8 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 33 Appendix ......................................................................................................................................... 34 Analytical methods...................................................................................................................... 35 Correlation matrices.................................................................................................................... 36 Secondary uranium minerals ......................................................................................................39 Classification of water types........................................................................................................ 40 Water analysis sheets ................................................................................................................. 42 1 / 120 List of figures Fig. 1: Location of sampling points ................................................................................................... 8 Fig. 2: Distribution of electrical conductivity in all samples including mine process waters .............. 9 Fig. 3: Spatial distribution of electrical conductivity (EC)................................................................. 10 Fig. 4: Correlation between TDS and EC for alluvial groundwater samples (S 13 not included) .... 10 Fig. 5: E-W-projection of sampling depth for chloride as a measure of salinity (samples from Rössing and Langer Heinrich mine included) ..................................................................................11 Fig. 6: Sodium hazard versus salinity hazard of alluvial groundwater in sampled water <5000 µS/cm....................................................................................................................................11 Fig 7: Piper-diagram of all water samples, colour-table depending on percentiles of EC............... 13 Fig. 8: Br/Cl molar ratios of alluvial groundwater samples.............................................................. 14 Fig. 9: Spatial distribution of chloride .............................................................................................. 14 Fig 10: E-W-projection of the molar ratio of chloride to sodium (log10 scale)................................. 15 Fig. 11: Correlation between sulphate and electrical conductivity (EC) in alluvial groundwater ..... 16 Fig. 12: Correlation between boron and electrical conductivity (EC) in alluvial groundwater.......... 16 Fig. 13: Correlation between fluoride and electrical conductivity (EC) in alluvial groundwater....... 17 Fig. 14: Correlation between bicarbonate and electrical conductivity (EC) in alluvial groundwater 18 Fig. 15: Spatial distribution of iron (samples from Rössing and Langer Heinrich mine included) ... 19 Fig. 16: Spatial distribution of nitrate in alluvial groundwater .......................................................... 19 Fig. 18: Spatial distribution of uranium in alluvial groundwater ....................................................... 22 2 / 120 List of tables Tab. 1: Groundwater samples with dissolved uranium concentrations above the 90 % percentile. 22 Tab. 2: Linear correlation matrix of dissolved Uranium and other anion-forming elements (red (>0.75) for “strong correlation”, bold black (>0.35) for “positive correlation” and bold blue (≤0.35) “disputed correlation, but higher than background”. ....................................................................... 23 Tab. 3: List of water samples from the Langer Heinrich and Rössing uranium mines .................... 25 Tab. 4: Chemical composition of water samples from the Langer Heinrich and Rössing uranium mines .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Tab. 5: Linear correlation matrix of dissolved uranium and trace elements .................................... 36 Tab. 6: Linear correlation matrix of main components
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 SEMP Report
    Ministry of Mines and Energy Geological Survey of Namibia Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush 2011 Annual Report February 2013 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Financial Support: The Ministry of Mines and Energy, through the Geological Survey of Namibia (GSN) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, through the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) Project Management: The Division of Engineering and Environmental Geology in the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy Status of Data Received: April 2012 Compiled by: Kaarina Ndalulilwa (GSN), Alina Haidula (GSN), Rosina Leonard (GSN), Israel Hasheela (GSN), Mary Hikumuah (GSN), Oscar Shaningwa (GSN), Dr Rainer Ellmies (BGR-GSN), Theo Wassenaar (NERMU), Mark Gardiner (Stanford University) Edited: Dr Gabi Schneider (GSN), Theo Wassenaar, Dr Joh Henschel (NERMU – Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit) © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2012 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2012). Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush, 2011 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia. Additional Information and queries to: The SEMP Office Dr Gabi Schneider Mr Israel Hasheela Geological Survey of Namibia Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Private
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Kranzberg Syncline and Emplacement Controls of the Usakos Pegmatite Field, Damara Belt, Central Namibia
    GEOLOGY OF THE KRANZBERG SYNCLINE AND EMPLACEMENT CONTROLS OF THE USAKOS PEGMATITE FIELD, DAMARA BELT, CENTRAL NAMIBIA by Geoffrey J. Owen Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof. Alex Kisters Faculty of Science Department of Earth Sciences March 2011 i DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitely otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature: Date: 15. February 2011 ii ABSTRACT The Central Zone (CZ) of the Damara belt in central Namibia is underlain by voluminous Pan-African granites and is host to numerous pegmatite occurrences, some of which have economic importance and have been mined extensively. This study discusses the occurrence, geometry, relative timing and emplacement mechanisms for the Usakos pegmatite field, located between the towns of Karibib and Usakos and within the core of the regional-scale Kranzberg syncline. Lithological mapping of the Kuiseb Formation in the core of the Kranzberg syncline identified four litho-units that form an up to 800 m thick succession of metaturbidites describing an overall coarsening upward trend. This coarsening upwards trend suggests sedimentation of the formation’s upper parts may have occurred during crustal convergence and basin closure between the Kalahari and Congo Cratons, rather than during continued spreading as previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • URANIUM MINING in NAMIBIA the Mystery Behind ‘Low Level Radiation’
    URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ Labour Resource and Research Institute January 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ResearchedHilma Shindondola-Mote and compiled by URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ I Labour Resource and Research Institute February 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ISBN: 99916-64-92-0 Researched and compiled by Hilma Shindondola-Mote II Table of Contents Abbreviations.............................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................ vi Executive summary ...................................................................................vii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background and purpose of the study .................................... 1 1.2. Research design ........................................................................ 3 2. Namibia: social and economic profile ................................................... 4 2.1. Employment and Unemloyment ...............................................5 3. Mining industry in Namibia .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Application No: APP-001418
    Application No: APP-001418 Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Exploration Activities of Base & Rare & Precious Metal, Dimension Stones and Industrial Minerals On Exclusive Prospecting Licenses 4926 between Wilhelmstal and Otjimbingwe area, in Karibib District, Erongo Region July 2020 CONSULTANT: PROPONENT Mr. Ipeinge Mundjulu (BSC, MSc) Epangelo Mining Pty Ltd Red-Dune Consulting CC Private Bag 13369 P O Box 27623 Windhoek Windhoek Cell: +264 81 147 7889 DOCUMENT INFORMATION DOCUMENT STATUS FINAL APPLICATION NO: APP-001418 PROJECT TITLE Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Exploration Activities of Base & Rare & Precious Metal, Dimension Stones and Industrial Minerals On Exclusive Prospecting Licenses 4926 CLIENT Epangelo Mining Pty Ltd PROJECT CONSULTANT Mr. Ipeinge Mundjulu LOCATION Between Wilhelmstal and Otjimbingwe area, in Karibib District, Erongo Region Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ ii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Regulatory Requirements ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The Need and Desirability of the Project ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Terms of Reference .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Namib Desert Express, Namibia Itinerary
    Namib Desert Express, Namibia Itinerary Day 1: You will be met on arrival at Windhoek International Airport. Meet the rest of your riding group for dinner. A Namibia Horse Safari Company representative will brief the group about what to expect during your adventure. Overnight at Thule Hotel, (Gorges Street, Windhoek. Tel: +264 61 371 950). www.hotelthule.com The following is a sample itinerary to be used as a rough guideline of how the days might pan out. Day 3 and 4 Usually you can expect to ride for between around4 Good going affords some faster-paced riding on the and 8 hours each day, covering 30-40kmover varied wide plains of the Namib. Dry watercourses, terrain. The route, overnight stops and hours in the distinguishable by the long lines of acacia trees, are a saddle can change, but always with your best interests much favoured resting place of giraffe, springbok and in mind. oryx. Day 2 After an early breakfast, begin your journey into the desert (approximately 6 hours) with a dramatic drop off the escarpment. Lunch will be en-route. Arrive in camp mid-afternoon. There will be time to orientate yourself, meet the crew and the horses and relax watching a magnificent Namib sunset. As you approach the coast, the plains become more arid and strange shapes form and disappear in mirages. Dinosaur-like plants - the gnarled Welwitschia Mirabilis - tell of a land of great antiquity and of tremendous solitude. During the ride the landscape changes all the time and the pace quickens where the terrain allows.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stochastic Approach Towards a Post Closure Safety Assessment
    A STOCHASTIC APPROACH TOWARDS A POST CLOSURE SAFETY ASSESSMENT A Ramlakan1, GP de Beer1, A Abrahams2, R Schneeweiss2 1NECSA, PO Box 582, Pretoria 0001, South Africa, E-mail: [email protected] 2Rössing Uranium Ltd, Private Bag 5005, Swakopmund, Namibia. Abstract. Following an extensive data acquisition programme to identify and characterize sources on the mine as well as some enhanced background sources around the mine site, a post-closure safety assessment has been performed for the Rössing uranium mine in Namibia. The transport of radioactivity from these sources to exposed critical groups was studied through atmospheric and simple aquatic pathway models together with analyzed data and estimated parameters. Using dose models the doses to pre-identified critical groups were assessed for the various pathways in a deterministic safety assessment. The effect of some dust mitigation options was also assessed, while the effect of post-closure institutional control of water seepage was considered in the aquatic model. A stochastic assessment was next attempted to provide information on the possible range and distribution of the assessed doses in terms of uncertainties in the experimental data and parameters used. While insufficient data caused some difficulties, various approximate distributions have been obtained for several of the parameters used. Techniques range from the utilization of the means and standard deviations of analytical data, published parameter ranges and other approximate methods to estimate parameter distributions. Using random selections from these distributions, the dose distributions for various exposure pathways and scenarios have been assessed. The deterministic doses were used to distinguish those critical groups where doses would likely be above the dose constraint from those where doses would likely be below the dose constraint or trivial.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual SEMP Report
    Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Province 2016 Annual Report December 2017 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Project Management: Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey of Namibia, Divi- sion of Engineering and Environmental Geology Status of Data Received: November 2017 Compiled by: Norwel Mwananawa (GSN) and Sandra Müller (NUA) Contributions from: Geological Survey of Namibia (Israel Hasheela, Norwel Mwananawa, Alfeus Moses, Michelle Hijamutiti) DWAF (Anna David and Nicholene Likando) MET (Hiskia Mbura and Riaan Solomon) Namibian Uranium Association (Frances Anderson, Carlene Binne- man, Werner Ewald, Murray Hill, Sandra Müller, Jacklyn Mwenze, Ingrid Scholz, Zhao Xigang) NamPort (Tim Eimann) NamWater (Merylinda Conradie, Erwin Shiluama, Henry Mukendwa, Selma Muundjua and Willem Venter) NERMU (Elbé Becker and Theo Wassenaar) NRPA (Joseph Eiman) Swakopmund Municipality (Robeam Ujaha) Walvis Bay Municipality (Nangula Amuntenya, David Uushona and André Burger) Final editing: Norwel Mwananawa, Sandra Müller and Israel Hasheela © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2017 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2017): Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Cen- tral Namib Uranium Mining Province, 2016 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia Additional Information and queries to: Mr. Norwel Mwananawa Coordinator Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264-61-2848157 Email: [email protected] 2016 Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report for the Central Namib Uranium Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Namibian uranium province is a pub- lic-private collaborative initiative housed within the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine
    Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine April, 201 4 Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine Contributions by Bruno Chareyron EJOLT Report Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine April - 2014 EJOLT & CRIIRAD Report Report written by: Bruno Chareyron (CRIIRAD) Editor: Marta Conde Radiological The contents of this report may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the authors, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Impact of This publication was developed as a part of the project Environmental Justice Organisations, Liabilities and Trade (EJOLT) (FP7-Science in Society-2010-1). Rössing EJOLT aims to improve policy responses to and support collaborative research and action on environmental conflicts through capacity building of environmental justice groups around the world. Rio Tinto Visit our free resource library and dat abase at www.ejolt.org , follow us on Facebook www.facebook.com/ejolt or follow tweets (@EnvJustice) to stay current on latest news Uranium Mine and events . Disclaimer: The EJOLT project (2011-15) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 266642. The views and opinions expressed in the website and in all EJOLT publications and documentaries including the Atlas reflect the authors’ view and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This document should be cited as: Chareyron, B. 2014. Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine. EJOLT & CRIIRAD Report EJOLT Report Radiological Impact of Rössing Rio Tinto Uranium Mine Summary This report is based on on site radioactivity measurements and laboratory analysis of soil, sediments and water samples taken in the vicinity of the Rössing Rio Tinto mine.
    [Show full text]
  • July 11, 2018 OSINO RESOURCES PROVIDES DETAILS on ITS 2018
    Osino Resources Corp. 7 Saint Thomas Street Suite 803, Toronto, M5S 2B7 Ontario, Canada July 11, 2018 OSINO RESOURCES PROVIDES DETAILS ON ITS 2018 WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY Vancouver, British Columbia, July 11, 2018 – Osino Resources Corp. (TSXV: OSI) ("Osino” or “the Company”), is pleased to provide details on its Namibian gold exploration activities and work programs for 2018, where extensive progress has been made in identifying and defining a new mineralisation trend which is in the process of being drill-tested. Work to date in 2017 and early 2018 has focused on defining drill targets using systematic regional and follow up surface geochemical sampling and field mapping. A number of new drill targets have now been tested and results are being finalized. Work on targets along the newly defined Khan River Fault Zone is ongoing with the aim of further drilling in H2 2018. Osino’s overall landholding is now approximately 5,700km2, comprising 19 licenses grouped into three areas of activity, namely 1) the Karibib Gold Project; 2) Otjikoto East; and 3) Otjiwarongo (Figure 1). Osino is currently focusing the majority of its efforts on developing the Karibib Gold Project. The other 2 areas are at the target definition and generation stage. Karibib Gold Project The 2018 work program is focused on follow-up of targets defined by 2016/2017 work, including drilling, surface geochemistry and airborne geophysics (see below). ± 2,900m of drilling has been completed to date on the Twin Hills and Okapawe targets. Assay results have been received and final QAQC checks are underway prior to release.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulley Engineering Geology Swakopmund
    Communs geol. Surv. S.W Africa/Namibia, 2, (1986), 7-12 A. REPORTS BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGY OF SWAKOPMUND by B.G. Bulley ABSTRACT of the area has been shaped largely by luvial, marine and arid pedogenic processes. Old drainage lines of the An engineering geological survey of Swakopmund, Swakop River, up to 5 km north of it’s present course, one of South West Africa’s major developing centres, are indicated by alluvial terraces and silty deposits. The has been undertaken in order to provide an informa- Swakop River loods through to the Atlantic Ocean dur- tion base for further expansion. The town is located on ing periods of heavy rainfall in the catchment. Severe Cenozoic luvio-marine and alluvial deposits that over- loods occurred in 1931 and 1933, when the railway lie Precambrian Damara Sequence rocks and Karoo age bridge, houses and gardens were washed away (Sten- dolerites. The coastal environment is highly corrosive, gel, 1964). Northerly longshore drift has resulted in due to abundant airborne salts, the frequent fogs and a marked degradation of Swakopmund’s beaches and salty, moist soils. Protective anti-corrosion measures rockill breakwaters have been constructed to prevent should therefore be provided and construction mate- further erosion (Swart, 1982). rials must be chosen with care. Although foundation An engineering geological survey of Swakopmund conditions are generally good, differential settlement was undertaken during May and June 1983, in order can occur on some of the unconsolidated supericial de- to provide an information base for future development. posits. Construction materials, in the form of ine and The investigation commenced with a literature study, coarse aggregate for concrete, are readily available in followed by detailed aerial photographic interpretation the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Updated Process Framework for the Namibian Coast Conservation
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized for the Namibian Coast Conservation and Management TheProcess Updated Framework Project (NACOMA) 24 March 2011 24 March RP822 REV RP822 Table of Contents The Updated Process Framework ....................................................................................... 0 for the Namibian Coast Conservation and Management Project (NACOMA)................... 0 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 5 2. Communication and participation framework................................................................. 8 2.1 Community participation in developing and managing protected areas covered by NACOMA ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Developing the ‘people and parks matrix’ concept in the DNP................................ 9 2.3 Developing the Management and Development Plan for the Skeleton Coast National Park................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Developing the Management and Development Plan for the Namib-Naukluft Park ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Findaid 2/72
    Findaid 2/127 National Archives of Namibia Private Accessions Findaid 2/127 A.0068 Palgrave Album 1876 Compiled in 2017 National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/127 For Private Accession A.0068: Palgrave Album Described by Werner Hillebrecht, Windhoek, 2017 © National Archives of Namibia, 2017 Republic of Namibia Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture National Archives of Namibia P/Bag 13250 Windhoek Namibia [email protected] From A.0068 – Photo 1033, Walvis Bay in 1876 2 A.0068 – Palgrave Album Introduction Description This accession consists of a large-format photo album with __ pages, size 60 x 48 x 9 cm. The photos, showing portraits, group portraits, landscapes and buildings from southern and central Namibia, were taken in 1876. Most photos are of excellent quality and in good preservation condition. Many of the iconic images from this album have been repeatedly used in publications on 19th century Namibian history. Provenance The photographs were taken by F. Hodgson who accompanied the Cape Government’s Special Commissioner William Coates Palgrave on his mission to Namibia in 1876. Altogether three albums, with slightly differing contents, are known to exist (the other two are owned by the Parliament Library in Cape Town, and the National Library of South Africa (Cape Town). They were presented together with Palgrave's report to Parliament). This album had been in the possession of Mr. J.J. Christie, who was Palgrave's Secretary. It was bought from his son, H. Christie, Kimberley, in 1953 by the Historical Monuments Commission, and deposited at the National Archives. Between 1924-1949, it had temporarily been in the custody of Kimberley Public Library.
    [Show full text]