Application No: APP-001418

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Application No: APP-001418 Application No: APP-001418 Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Exploration Activities of Base & Rare & Precious Metal, Dimension Stones and Industrial Minerals On Exclusive Prospecting Licenses 4926 between Wilhelmstal and Otjimbingwe area, in Karibib District, Erongo Region July 2020 CONSULTANT: PROPONENT Mr. Ipeinge Mundjulu (BSC, MSc) Epangelo Mining Pty Ltd Red-Dune Consulting CC Private Bag 13369 P O Box 27623 Windhoek Windhoek Cell: +264 81 147 7889 DOCUMENT INFORMATION DOCUMENT STATUS FINAL APPLICATION NO: APP-001418 PROJECT TITLE Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Exploration Activities of Base & Rare & Precious Metal, Dimension Stones and Industrial Minerals On Exclusive Prospecting Licenses 4926 CLIENT Epangelo Mining Pty Ltd PROJECT CONSULTANT Mr. Ipeinge Mundjulu LOCATION Between Wilhelmstal and Otjimbingwe area, in Karibib District, Erongo Region Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ ii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Regulatory Requirements ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The Need and Desirability of the Project ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Scope of the EIA .............................................................................................................. 3 2. Project Description.................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Location ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2. Project Activities .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.1. Phase 1. Non-Invasive Exploration........................................................................... 8 2.2.2. Phase 2. Evasive Exploration .................................................................................... 9 2.3. Equipment ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1. Vehicles................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2. Drilling .................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.3. Airborne Geophysical survey ................................................................................. 12 3. Description of the Affected Environment ............................................................................. 13 3.1. Physical Environment .................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1. Climate .................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.2. Geology ................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3. Topography and Drainage ....................................................................................... 13 3.1.4. Ecology ................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.5. Ecological Impact Assessment ............................................................................... 17 3.1.6. Socio-Economic Environment ................................................................................ 18 3.1.7. Land Use ................................................................................................................. 18 3.1.8. Archaeology ............................................................................................................ 18 3.1.9. Population Demography ......................................................................................... 19 4. Project Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 21 5. Policy and Legal Framework ................................................................................................ 23 6. Public Consultation ............................................................................................................... 26 6.1. Newspaper Adverts ........................................................................................................ 26 6.2. Public Meeting ............................................................................................................... 26 6.2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 26 6.2.2. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process ................................................. 28 6.2.3. Reduction of the EPL size ....................................................................................... 29 6.2.4. Comment / Question and Response ........................................................................ 30 7. Impact Identification and Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 40 7.1. Impact Identification ...................................................................................................... 40 7.2. Impact Risk Assessment Procedure ............................................................................... 42 7.3. Identified Impacts ........................................................................................................... 42 7.3.1. Potential Negative Impacts ..................................................................................... 42 7.3.2. Potential Positive Impact of the project .................................................................. 43 8. Risks Assessment .................................................................................................................. 43 8.1. Planning Phase ............................................................................................................... 43 8.2. Operational Phase ........................................................................................................... 44 8.2.1. Socio-Economic Impacts ........................................................................................ 44 8.2.2. Bio-Physical Impacts .............................................................................................. 48 9. Decommissioning and Rehabilitation ................................................................................... 52 10. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 52 10.1. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 52 10.2. Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 52 11. Reference ........................................................................................................................... 53 List of Figures Figure 1 The EIA Process in Namibia ........................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. EPL 4926 Location ......................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3. Exploration vehicles (For illustration purposes) .......................................................... 11 Figure 4. An illustration of a hand dug trench (For illustration purposes) .................................. 11 Figure 5. A truck mounted RC drill rig and a skid mounted drill rig (For illustration purposes) 12 Figure 6. An illustration of a fixed wing Cessna ......................................................................... 12 Figure 7. Landscape of some areas of EPL 4926 ......................................................................... 14 Figure 8. Dominant Species observed at the study area .............................................................. 17 Figure 9. Cattles on the farm in the study area ............................................................................ 17 Figure 10. The Rhenish Mission church (1865) .......................................................................... 19 Figure 11. Public meeting at Wilhelmstal farmers’ association offices ...................................... 27 Figure 12. Matrix used for the impact assessment ....................................................................... 42 List of Tables Table 1. Identified listed activities concerning the proposed project. ............................................ 1 Table 2. GPS Coordinates for EPL 4926 ....................................................................................... 7 Table 3. Project alternatives ......................................................................................................... 21 Table 4. Policy and Legal framework .......................................................................................... 23 Table 5. Newspaper Adverts .......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2011 SEMP Report
    Ministry of Mines and Energy Geological Survey of Namibia Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush 2011 Annual Report February 2013 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Financial Support: The Ministry of Mines and Energy, through the Geological Survey of Namibia (GSN) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, through the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) Project Management: The Division of Engineering and Environmental Geology in the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy Status of Data Received: April 2012 Compiled by: Kaarina Ndalulilwa (GSN), Alina Haidula (GSN), Rosina Leonard (GSN), Israel Hasheela (GSN), Mary Hikumuah (GSN), Oscar Shaningwa (GSN), Dr Rainer Ellmies (BGR-GSN), Theo Wassenaar (NERMU), Mark Gardiner (Stanford University) Edited: Dr Gabi Schneider (GSN), Theo Wassenaar, Dr Joh Henschel (NERMU – Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit) © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2012 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2012). Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush, 2011 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia. Additional Information and queries to: The SEMP Office Dr Gabi Schneider Mr Israel Hasheela Geological Survey of Namibia Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Private
    [Show full text]
  • Missionary Perspectives and Experiences of 19Th and Early 20Th Century Droughts
    1 2 “Everything is scorched by the burning sun”: Missionary perspectives and 3 experiences of 19th and early 20th century droughts in semi-arid central 4 Namibia 5 6 Stefan Grab1, Tizian Zumthurm,2,3 7 8 1 School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the 9 Witwatersrand, South Africa 10 2 Institute of the History of Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland 11 3 Centre for African Studies, University of Basel, Switzerland 12 13 Correspondence to: Stefan Grab ([email protected]) 14 15 Abstract. Limited research has focussed on historical droughts during the pre-instrumental 16 weather-recording period in semi-arid to arid human-inhabited environments. Here we describe 17 the unique nature of droughts over semi-arid central Namibia (southern Africa) between 1850 18 and 1920. More particularly, our intention is to establish temporal shifts of influence and 19 impact that historical droughts had on society and the environment during this period. This is 20 achieved through scrutinizing documentary records sourced from a variety of archives and 21 libraries. The primary source of information comes from missionary diaries, letters and reports. 22 These missionaries were based at a variety of stations across the central Namibian region and 23 thus collectively provide insight to sub-regional (or site specific) differences in hydro- 24 meteorological conditions, and drought impacts and responses. Earliest instrumental rainfall 25 records (1891-1913) from several missionary stations or settlements are used to quantify hydro- 26 meteorological conditions and compare with documentary sources. The work demonstrates 27 strong-sub-regional contrasts in drought conditions during some given drought events and the 28 dire implications of failed rain seasons, the consequences of which lasted many months to 29 several years.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSION APOLOGETICS: the RHENISH MISSION from WARS and GENOCIDE to the NAZI REVOLUTION, 1904-1936 GLEN RYLAND MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY [email protected]
    STORIES AND MISSION APOLOGETICS: THE RHENISH MISSION FROM WARS AND GENOCIDE TO THE NAZI REVOLUTION, 1904-1936 GLEN RYLAND MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY [email protected] tories of a Herero woman, Uerieta Kaza- Some Germans even met her face-to-face when Shendike (1837-1936), have circulated for a she visited the Rhineland and Westphalia with century and a half among German Protestants in missionary Carl Hugo Hahn in 1859, a year the Upper Rhineland and Westphalian region. after her baptism.2 Other than a few elites, no Known to mission enthusiasts as Johanna other Herero received as much written attention Gertze, or more often “Black Johanna” from the missionaries as Uerieta did. Why was (Schwarze Johanna), Uerieta was the first her story of interest to missions-minded Protest- Herero convert of the Rhenish Mission Society. ants in Germany? By 1936, her life had spanned the entire period In 1936, missionary Heinrich Vedder again of the Herero mission she had served since her told her story, this time shaping her into an youth. Over the years, the mission society African heroine for the Rhenish Mission. In published multiple versions of her story Vedder’s presentation “Black Johanna” demon- together with drawings and photos of her.1 strated the mission’s success in the past and embodied a call for Germans in the new era of National Socialism to do their duty toward so- called inferior peoples. Vedder used Uerieta’s I am grateful to Dr. Doris L. Bergen, Chancellor Rose story to shape an apologetic for Protestant mis- and Ray Wolfe Professor of Holocaust Studies, Uni- sions within the new regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Missionary Perspectives and Experiences of 19Th And
    1 2 “Everything is scorched by the burning sun”: Missionary perspectives and 3 experiences of 19 th and early 20 th century droughts in semi-arid central 4 Namibia 5 6 Stefan Grab 1, Tizian Zumthurm ,2,3 7 8 1 School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the 9 Witwatersrand, South Africa 10 2 Institute of the History of Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland 11 3 Centre for African Studies, University of Basel, Switzerland 12 13 Correspondence to : Stefan Grab ( [email protected] ) 14 15 Abstract. Limited research has focussed on historical droughts during the pre-instrumental 16 weather-recording period in semi-arid to arid human-inhabited environments. Here we describe 17 the unique nature of droughts over semi-arid central Namibia (southern Africa) between 1850 18 and 1920. More particularly, our intention is to establish temporal shifts of influence and 19 impact that historical droughts had on society and the environment during this period. This is 20 achieved through scrutinizing documentary records sourced from a variety of archives and 21 libraries. The primary source of information comes from missionary diaries, letters and reports. 22 These missionaries were based at a variety of stations across the central Namibian region and 23 thus collectively provide insight to sub-regional (or site specific) differences in hydro- 24 meteorological conditions, and drought impacts and responses. Earliest instrumental rainfall 25 records (1891-1913) from several missionary stations or settlements are used to quantify hydro- 26 meteorological conditions and compare with documentary sources. The work demonstrates 27 strong-sub-regional contrasts in drought conditions during some given drought events and the 28 dire implications of failed rain seasons, the consequences of which lasted many months to 29 several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Kranzberg Syncline and Emplacement Controls of the Usakos Pegmatite Field, Damara Belt, Central Namibia
    GEOLOGY OF THE KRANZBERG SYNCLINE AND EMPLACEMENT CONTROLS OF THE USAKOS PEGMATITE FIELD, DAMARA BELT, CENTRAL NAMIBIA by Geoffrey J. Owen Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof. Alex Kisters Faculty of Science Department of Earth Sciences March 2011 i DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitely otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature: Date: 15. February 2011 ii ABSTRACT The Central Zone (CZ) of the Damara belt in central Namibia is underlain by voluminous Pan-African granites and is host to numerous pegmatite occurrences, some of which have economic importance and have been mined extensively. This study discusses the occurrence, geometry, relative timing and emplacement mechanisms for the Usakos pegmatite field, located between the towns of Karibib and Usakos and within the core of the regional-scale Kranzberg syncline. Lithological mapping of the Kuiseb Formation in the core of the Kranzberg syncline identified four litho-units that form an up to 800 m thick succession of metaturbidites describing an overall coarsening upward trend. This coarsening upwards trend suggests sedimentation of the formation’s upper parts may have occurred during crustal convergence and basin closure between the Kalahari and Congo Cratons, rather than during continued spreading as previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • URANIUM MINING in NAMIBIA the Mystery Behind ‘Low Level Radiation’
    URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ Labour Resource and Research Institute January 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ResearchedHilma Shindondola-Mote and compiled by URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA The mystery behind ‘low level radiation’ I Labour Resource and Research Institute February 2009 Erf 8506, Mungunda Str Katutura, Windhoek P.O. Box 62423, Katutura Windhoek, Namibia Tel: + 264-61-212044 Fax: +264-61-217969 E-mail:[email protected] www.larri.com.na ISBN: 99916-64-92-0 Researched and compiled by Hilma Shindondola-Mote II Table of Contents Abbreviations.............................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................ vi Executive summary ...................................................................................vii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background and purpose of the study .................................... 1 1.2. Research design ........................................................................ 3 2. Namibia: social and economic profile ................................................... 4 2.1. Employment and Unemloyment ...............................................5 3. Mining industry in Namibia .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality Assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River Catchment with Respect to Geogenic Background Concentrations of Dissolved Uranium
    Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop- River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Hannover, July 2010 Commissioned by: i Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Commissioned by: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, BMZ) Project: Human Resources Development for the Geological Survey of Namibia, Engineering & Environmental Geology Subdivision BMZ-No.: 2008.2007.6 BGR-No.: 05-2332 BGR-Archive No.: 0129666 Date: July 2010 ii Summary Author: Dr. Robert Kringel, Dr. Frank Wagner & Dr. Hans Klinge Title: Groundwater quality assessment in the Khan- and Swakop-River catchment with respect to geogenic background concentrations of dissolved uranium Keywords: ephemeral river, geogenic background, groundwater, mine discharge, Namibia, uranium In 2009, 78 locations were sampled in the catchment areas of the ephemeral Swakop River and the tributary Khan River within the framework of a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) prior to new uranium mining activities. Samples were analysed for main components, dissolved uranium, and trace elements. Alluvial groundwater in the upper Khan and Swakop River catchments is freshwater of drinking water quality, whereas groundwater in the lower river catchment is saline. Nitrate concentrations are elevated yet below the WHO guideline value apart from a few exceptions. Potentially toxic trace element concentrations are without critical implications for drinking water quality. Drinking water samples from the municipalities of Swakopmund and Walvis Bay meet the requirements of the Namibian and the WHO drinking water standards. Process and seepage water samples from uranium mines have elevated concentrations of uranium, arsenic and fluoride, manganese and a number of other trace elements like lithium, nickel and cobalt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2009 The Transformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia Katherine Caufield Arnold College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Arnold, Katherine Caufield, "The rT ansformation of the Lutheran Church in Namibia" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 251. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/251 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Introduction Although we kept the fire alive, I well remember somebody telling me once, “We have been waiting for the coming of our Lord. But He is not coming. So we will wait forever for the liberation of Namibia.” I told him, “For sure, the Lord will come, and Namibia will be free.” -Pastor Zephania Kameeta, 1989 On June 30, 1971, risking persecution and death, the African leaders of the two largest Lutheran churches in Namibia1 issued a scathing “Open Letter” to the Prime Minister of South Africa, condemning both South Africa’s illegal occupation of Namibia and its implementation of a vicious apartheid system. It was the first time a church in Namibia had come out publicly against the South African government, and after the publication of the “Open Letter,” Anglican and Roman Catholic churches in Namibia reacted with solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform Is Basically a Class Issue”
    This land is my land! Motions and emotions around land reform in Namibia Erika von Wietersheim 1 This study and publication was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office. Copyright: FES 2021 Cover photo: Kristin Baalman/Shutterstock.com Cover design: Clara Mupopiwa-Schnack All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the written permission of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. First published 2008 Second extended edition 2021 Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Namibia Office P.O. Box 23652 Windhoek Namibia ISBN 978-99916-991-0-3 Printed by John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 5688 Windhoek / Namibia [email protected] 2 To all farmers in Namibia who love their land and take good care of it in honour of their ancestors and for the sake of their children 3 4 Acknowledgement I would like to thank the Friedrich-Ebert Foundation Windhoek, in particular its director Mr. Hubert Schillinger at the time of the first publication and Ms Freya Gruenhagen at the time of this extended second publication, as well as Sylvia Mundjindi, for generously supporting this study and thus making the publication of ‘This land is my land’ possible. Furthermore I thank Wolfgang Werner for adding valuable up-to-date information to this book about the development of land reform during the past 13 years. My special thanks go to all farmers who received me with an open heart and mind on their farms, patiently answered my numerous questions - and took me further with questions of their own - and those farmers and interview partners who contributed to this second edition their views on the progress of land reform until 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Flags, Funerals and Fanfares: Herer O and Missionary Contestations Ofthe Acceptable, 1900-1940 *
    Journal ofAfrican Cultural Studies, Volume 15, Number l, June 2002 Carfax Publishing Taylor & Franc« Group Flags, funerals and fanfares: Herer o and missionary contestations ofthe acceptable, 1900-1940 * JAN-BART GEWALD (Institute for African Studies, University of Cologne) ABSTRACT The article describes the contested relationship that existed between Herero people and German missionaries in Namibia between 1900 and 1940. 1t is argued that Herero converted to mission Christianity with specific aims and intentions, which were not necessarily the same as those envisaged or intended by German missionaries. The article highlights leisure time, commemorative activities and funerals, and indicates that Herero acquired specific forms of music, dress, comportment, and behaviour from German missionaries. Once these specific forms were acquired they were often transformed and brought to the f ore in ways that were considered unacceptable by the missionaries and settler society in general. The article shows that apart from race there was little difference in the intentions and activities of Herero and German settlers, both ofwhom sought to influence the same'colonial administration. In conclusion it is argued that, in the last resort, what was ofprimary importance in the colonial setting of Namibia between 1900 and 1940 was the issue of race. On a wintry Sunday morning in 1927, a missionary working in the small settlement of Otjimbingwe in Namibia found his early-morning devotional ministrations rudely disturbed by the stridently noisy arrival of a football team from the neighbouring town of Karibib. Borne on trucks bearing flags in the 'colours of the Ethiopian freedom movement' and singing songs, the young men and their supporters began a boisterous day of competition, and ensured that the missionary had but a paltry few church attendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Newsletter Wartburg Seminary Dubuque, IA 52001 May, 1983 Issue
    Namibia Newsletter Wartburg Seminary Dubuque, IA 52001 May, 1983 Issue The Namibia Conference is over . Exciting New Projects Dear Friends, It was exciting and exhilarating, inspirational and intense, Need Your Support political, prayerful and purposeful! The first ALC Namibia By Solveig Kjeseth Conference was held at Wartburg, March 4-6, 1983 . We wish that each of you could have been there. We are frequently asked about specific ways in which Lutherans Dozens of students volunteered hundreds of hours prepar- in this country may give tangible material aid to our sisters and ing for the Conference. Then they were "on duty" nearly brothers in Namibia . What follows is a report on the projects that around the clock during the event . We discovered there were our Namibia Concerns Committee is working on and a request for hundreds of details to be remembered! But for all of us it was your financial support. a tremendous chance to learn about Namibia, and to meet During the past year, your gifts made it possible for the some of the excellent resource persons who are involved in the Namibia Fund to contribute more than $10,000 for the Namibian struggle. student program at Wartburg! In addition, we have been able to Certainly the most impressive aspect of the weekend was send $2,000 to the Women 's Department of the Evangelical the presence of many Namibians . It was a great privilege to Lutheran Ovambokavango Church (ELOC) and $1,500 to their visit, discuss and work with these remarkable folks . Their Humanitarian Aid Fund which assists children whose parents openness, their courage and their Christian witness were have been killed or arrested in the struggle for freedom .
    [Show full text]