1256 Farm Karibib Charcoal Pla

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1256 Farm Karibib Charcoal Pla ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A CHARCOAL PROCESSING AND PACKAGING PLANT ON THE REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION A OF FARM KARIBIB NO. 54, KARIBIB DISTRICT, ERONGO REGION 2020 GREEN EARTH Environmental Consultants 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A CHARCOAL PROCESSING AND PACKAGING Project Name: PLANT ON THE REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION A OF FARM KARIBIB NO. 54, KARIBIB DISTRICT, ERONGO REGION Africa Burns (Pty) Ltd The Proponent: P O Box 1094 SWAKOPMUND Prepared by: Release Date: July 2020 C. Du Toit C. Van Der Walt Consultant: Cell: 081 127 3145 Fax: 061 248 608 Email: [email protected] GREEN EARTH Environmental Consultants 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Green Earth Environmental Consultants have been appointed by Africa Burns (Pty) Ltd to attend to and complete an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in order to obtain an Environmental Clearance Certificate for the construction and operation of a charcoal processing and packaging plant on the Remaining Extent of Portion A of Farm Karibib No. 54, in the Karibib District, Erongo Region as per the requirements of the Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2007) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (GN 30 in GG 4878 of 6 February 2012). The land within the immediate vicinity of the proposed charcoal plant is predominately characterized by natural open spaces associated with farming, mining, industrial and residential activities. In terms of the Regulations of the Environmental Management Act (No 7 of 2007) an Environmental Impact Assessment has to be done to address the following ‘Listed Activities’: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE TREATMENT, HANDLING AND STORAGE 9.1 The manufacturing, storage, handling or processing of a hazardous substance defined in the Hazardous Substances Ordinance, 1974. 9.2 Any process or activity which requires a permit, licence or other form of authorisation, or the modification of or changes to existing facilities for any process or activity which requires an amendment of an existing permit, licence or authorisation or which requires a new permit, licence or authorisation in terms of a law governing the generation or release of emissions, pollution, effluent or waste. The key characteristics/environmental impacts of the proposed project are as follows: Positive Impacts Negative impacts ± 45000kg/day of briquettes will be Charcoal dust will be created in the handling manufactured from FSC certified and crushing of the charcoal. charcoal to be exported. Value will be added to charcoal by Noise will be generated from the operations processing it into briquettes. of the electrical motors powering the crusher, hoppers, mixer, forklift and trucks offloading and collecting the product. ±40 permanent jobs will be created General dust will be generated during once the project is fully operational. construction and by the trucks delivering charcoal and collecting briquettes. Land currently underutilized will be put Water is required for the activities (drinking, to productive use. cleaning and toilets) of the workforce as well as for the manufacturing of the briquettes. New skills will be transferred to unskilled Electricity is required for the operation of the labourers. plant. Mitigation measures will be provided that can control the extent, intensity and frequency of these named impacts in order not to have substantial negative effects or results. GREEN EARTH Environmental Consultants 3 The type of activities that will be carried out on the site does not negatively affect the amenity of the locality and the activities do not adversely affect the environmental quality of the area. None of the potential impacts identified are regarded as having a significant impact to the extent that the proposed project should not be allowed. However, the operational activities further on need to be controlled and monitored by the assigned managers and the proponent (Africa Burns). The Environmental Impact Assessment which follows upon this paragraph was conducted in accordance with the guidelines and stipulations of the Environmental Management Act (No 7 of 2007) meaning that all possible impacts have been considered and the details are presented in the report. Based upon the conclusions and recommendations of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan following this paragraph the Environmental Commissioner of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism is herewith requested to: 1. Accept the Environmental Impact Assessment; 2. Approve the Environmental Management Plan; 3. Issue an Environmental Clearance Certificate for the construction and operation of a charcoal processing and packaging plant on the Remaining Extent of Portion A of Farm Karibib No. 54, in the Karibib District, Erongo Region and for the following “listed activities”: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE TREATMENT, HANDLING AND STORAGE 9.1 The manufacturing, storage, handling or processing of a hazardous substance defined in the Hazardous Substances Ordinance, 1974. 9.2 Any process or activity which requires a permit, licence or other form of authorisation, or the modification of or changes to existing facilities for any process or activity which requires an amendment of an existing permit, licence or authorisation or which requires a new permit, licence or authorisation in terms of a law governing the generation or release of emissions, pollution, effluent or waste. GREEN EARTH Environmental Consultants 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 8 LIST OF APPENDIXES .................................................................................................. 9 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 10 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 10 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON PROJECT................................................ 11 3.1. LOCALITY OF SITE ........................................................................................... 11 4. BULK SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION ................................ 15 4.1. ACCESS ROAD .............................................................................................. 15 4.2. WATER SUPPLY ............................................................................................ 16 4.3. ELECTRICITY RETICULATION ..................................................................... 17 4.4. SEWAGE DISPOSAL ..................................................................................... 17 4.5. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL/REFUSE REMOVAL .......................................... 17 4.6. FIRE PROTECTION ........................................................................................... 18 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 18 6. THE CHARCOAL INDUSTRY ............................................................................ 25 7. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING ISSUES IDENTIFIED .............................. 29 8. APPROACH TO THE STUDY ............................................................................ 30 9. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ................................................................. 31 10. ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL AND POLICY REQUIREMENTS ........................... 31 11. AFFECTED RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ......................................................... 45 11.1. BIODIVERSITY AND VEGETATION .................................................................. 45 11.2. CLIMATE ........................................................................................................... 47 11.3. WIND .................................................................................................................. 47 11.4. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ..................................................................................... 49 11.5. GEOHYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE ............................. 49 11.6. GROUNDWATER............................................................................................... 51 11.7. SURFACE WATER ............................................................................................ 52 11.8. SOCIAL-ECONOMIC COMPONENT ................................................................. 52 11.9. CULTURAL HERITAGE ..................................................................................... 53 11.10. SENSE OF PLACE ............................................................................................ 53 11.11. HEALTH ............................................................................................................. 53 11.12. ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................... 53 12. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION .................................................................. 54 12.1. IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 55 GREEN EARTH Environmental Consultants 5 12.1.1. WATER USAGE .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • GUIDE to CIVIL SOCIETY in NAMIBIA 3Rd Edition
    GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA GUIDE TO 3Rd Edition 3Rd Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono and Naita Marowa PJ Rejoice Compiled by GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA 3rd Edition AN OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE AND ACTIVITIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA COMPILED BY: Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono PUBLISHED BY: Namibia Institute for Democracy FUNDED BY: Hanns Seidel Foundation Namibia COPYRIGHT: 2018 Namibia Institute for Democracy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronical or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission of the publisher. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: K22 Communications/Afterschool PRINTED BY : John Meinert Printing ISBN: 978-99916-865-5-4 PHYSICAL ADDRESS House of Democracy 70-72 Dr. Frans Indongo Street Windhoek West P.O. Box 11956, Klein Windhoek Windhoek, Namibia EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.nid.org.na You may forward the completed questionnaire at the end of this guide to NID or contact NID for inclusion in possible future editions of this guide Foreword A vibrant civil society is the cornerstone of educated, safe, clean, involved and spiritually each community and of our Democracy. uplifted. Namibia’s constitution gives us, the citizens and inhabitants, the freedom and mandate CSOs spearheaded Namibia’s Independence to get involved in our governing process. process. As watchdogs we hold our elected The 3rd Edition of the Guide to Civil Society representatives accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis Ssp
    Angolan Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis ssp. angolensis) Appendix 1: Historical and recent geographic range and population of Angolan Giraffe G. c. angolensis Geographic Range ANGOLA Historical range in Angola Giraffe formerly occurred in the mopane and acacia savannas of southern Angola (East 1999). According to Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo (2005), the historic distribution of the species presented a discontinuous range with two, reputedly separated, populations. The western-most population extended from the upper course of the Curoca River through Otchinjau to the banks of the Kunene (synonymous Cunene) River, and through Cuamato and the Mupa area further north (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). The intention of protecting this western population of G. c. angolensis, led to the proclamation of Mupa National Park (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). The eastern population occurred between the Cuito and Cuando Rivers, with larger numbers of records from the southeast corner of the former Mucusso Game Reserve (Crawford-Cabral and Verissimo 2005, Dagg 1962). By the late 1990s Giraffe were assumed to be extinct in Angola (East 1999). According to Kuedikuenda and Xavier (2009), a small population of Angolan Giraffe may still occur in Mupa National Park; however, no census data exist to substantiate this claim. As the Park was ravaged by poachers and refugees, it was generally accepted that Giraffe were locally extinct until recent re-introductions into southern Angola from Namibia (Kissama Foundation 2015, East 1999, P. Vaz Pinto pers. comm.). BOTSWANA Current range in Botswana Recent genetic analyses have revealed that the population of Giraffe in the Central Kalahari and Khutse Game Reserves in central Botswana is from the subspecies G.
    [Show full text]
  • RUMOURS of RAIN: NAMIBIA's POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre Du Pisani
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN ISSUES RUMOURS OF RAIN: NAMIBIA'S POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre du Pisani THE .^-y^Vr^w DIE SOUTH AFRICAN i^W*nVv\\ SUID AFRIKAANSE INSTITUTE OF f I \V\tf)) }) INSTITUUT VAN INTERNATIONAL ^^J£g^ INTERNASIONALE AFFAIRS ^*^~~ AANGELEENTHEDE SOUTHERN AFRICAN ISSUES NO 3 RUMOURS OF RAIN: NAMIBIA'S POST-INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE Andre du Pisani ISBN NO.: 0-908371-88-8 February 1991 Toe South African Institute of International Affairs Jan Smuts House P.O. Box 31596 Braamfontein 2017 Johannesburg South Africa CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 POUTICS IN AFRICA'S NEWEST STATE 2 National Reconciliation 2 Nation Building 4 Labour in Namibia 6 Education 8 The Local State 8 The Judiciary 9 Broadcasting 10 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC REALM - AN UNBALANCED INHERITANCE 12 Mining 18 Energy 19 Construction 19 Fisheries 20 Agriculture and Land 22 Foreign Exchange 23 FOREIGN RELATIONS - NAMIBIA AND THE WORLD 24 CONCLUSIONS 35 REFERENCES 38 BIBLIOGRAPHY 40 ANNEXURES I - 5 and MAP 44 INTRODUCTION Namibia's accession to independence on 21 March 1990 was an uplifting event, not only for the people of that country, but for the Southern African region as a whole. Independence brought to an end one of the most intractable and wasteful conflicts in the region. With independence, the people of Namibia not only gained political freedom, but set out on the challenging task of building a nation and defining their relations with the world. From the perspective of mediation, the role of the international community in bringing about Namibia's independence in general, and that of the United Nations in particular, was of a deep structural nature.
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR Briefing Paper NO 44 Political Party Life in Namibia
    Institute for Public Policy Research Political Party Life in Namibia: Dominant Party with Democratic Consolidation * Briefing Paper No. 44, February 2009 By André du Pisani and William A. Lindeke Abstract This paper assesses the established dominant-party system in Namibia since independence. Despite the proliferation of parties and changes in personalities at the top, three features have structured this system: 1) the extended independence honeymoon that benefits and is sustained by the ruling SWAPO Party of Namibia, 2) the relatively effective governance of Namibia by the ruling party, and 3) the policy choices and political behaviours of both the ruling and opposition politicians. The paper was funded in part by the Danish government through Wits University in an as yet unpublished form. This version will soon be published by Praeger Publishers in the USA under Series Editor Kay Lawson. “...an emergent literature on African party systems points to low levels of party institutionalization, high levels of electoral volatility, and the revival of dominant parties.” 1 Introduction Political reform, democracy, and governance are centre stage in Africa at present. African analysts frequently point to the foreign nature of modern party systems compared to the pre-colonial political cultures that partially survive in the traditional arenas especially of rural politics. However, over the past two decades multi-party elections became the clarion call by civil society (not to mention international forces) for the reintroduction of democratic political systems. This reinvigoration of reform peaked just as Namibia gained its independence under provisions of the UN Security Council Resolution 435 (1978) and the supervision of the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Kranzberg Syncline and Emplacement Controls of the Usakos Pegmatite Field, Damara Belt, Central Namibia
    GEOLOGY OF THE KRANZBERG SYNCLINE AND EMPLACEMENT CONTROLS OF THE USAKOS PEGMATITE FIELD, DAMARA BELT, CENTRAL NAMIBIA by Geoffrey J. Owen Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof. Alex Kisters Faculty of Science Department of Earth Sciences March 2011 i DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitely otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature: Date: 15. February 2011 ii ABSTRACT The Central Zone (CZ) of the Damara belt in central Namibia is underlain by voluminous Pan-African granites and is host to numerous pegmatite occurrences, some of which have economic importance and have been mined extensively. This study discusses the occurrence, geometry, relative timing and emplacement mechanisms for the Usakos pegmatite field, located between the towns of Karibib and Usakos and within the core of the regional-scale Kranzberg syncline. Lithological mapping of the Kuiseb Formation in the core of the Kranzberg syncline identified four litho-units that form an up to 800 m thick succession of metaturbidites describing an overall coarsening upward trend. This coarsening upwards trend suggests sedimentation of the formation’s upper parts may have occurred during crustal convergence and basin closure between the Kalahari and Congo Cratons, rather than during continued spreading as previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011
    ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Walvis Bay Baseline Study *Title: Walvis Bay Baseline Study *By: Priscilla Rowswell and Lucinda Fairhurst *Report Type: Research Study, *Date: February 2011 *IDRC Project Number-Component Number: 105868-001 *IDRC Project Title: Sub-Saharan African Cities: A Five-City Network to Pioneer Climate Adaptation through Participatory Research and Local Action. *Country/Region: Namibia, South Africa, Mozambique, Tanzania, Mauritius *Full Name of Research Institution: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Address of Research Institution: P.O. Box 5319, Tygervalley, 7536, Cape Town, South Africa *Name(s) of ICLEI Africa Core Project Team: Lucinda Fairhurst and Priscilla Rowswell *Contact Information of Researcher/Research Team members: [email protected]; +27 21 487 2312 *This report is presented as received from project recipient(s). It has not been subjected to peer review or other review processes. *This work is used with the permission of ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Copyright: 2012, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability - Africa *Abstract: This project addresses knowledge, resource, capacity and networking gaps on the theme: 'Strengthening urban governments in planning adaptation.' The main objective of this project is to develop an adaptation framework for managing the increased risk to African local government and their communities due to climate change impact. The ultimate beneficiaries of this project will be African local governments and their communities. The guiding and well-tested ICLEI principle of locally designed and owned projects for the global common good, specifically in a developing world context, will be applied throughout project design, inception and delivery. Additionally, the research will test the theory that the most vulnerable living and working in different geographical, climatic and ecosystem zones will be impacted differently and as such, will require a different set of actions to be taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Starline Timetable
    TRAIN : WINDHOEK – GOBABIS – WINDHOEK TRAIN : WINDHOEK – OTJIWARONGO – WINDHOEK TRAIN NO 9903 TRAIN NO 9904 TRAIN NO 9966 TRAIN NO 9915 TIMETABLE DAYS MON, DAYS MON, MONDAYS MONDAY WED, FRI WED, FRI WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Windhoek D 05:50 Gobabis D 14:50 Windhoek D 15:45 Otjiwarongo D 15:40 Hoffnung D 06:55 Witvlei D 16:14 Okahandja A 18:00 Omaruru A 18:30 Neudamm D 07:35 Omitara A 17:52 D 18:05 D 19:30 Omitara A 10:10 D 17:56 Karibib D 20:40 Kranzberg A 21:10 D 10:12 Neudamm D 20:36 Kranzberg A 21:20 D 21:50 Witvlei D 11:53 Hoffnung D 21:18 D 21:40 Karibib D 22:20 Gobabis A 13:25 Windhoek A 22:25 Omaruru A 23:00 Okahandja A 01:30 D 23:35 D 01:40 Otjiwarongo A 02:20 Windhoek A 03:20 TRAIN : WINDHOEK – WALVIS BAY – WINDHOEK TRAIN: WALVIS BAY–OTJIWARONGO–WALVIS BAY EFFECTIVE FROM TRAIN NO 9908 TRAIN NO 9909 TRAIN NO 9901 / 9912 TRAIN NO 9907 / 9900 DAYS DAILY DAYS DAILY MONDAY MONDAY MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2008 EXCEPT EXCEPT WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY SAT SAT FRIDAY FRIDAY STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS STATIONS Business Hours : Windhoek Central Reservations : Monday – Friday 07:00 to 19:00 Tel. (061) 298 2032/2175 Windhoek D 19:55 Walvis Bay D 19:00 Otjiwarongo D 14:40 Walvis Bay D 14:20 Saturdays 07:00 to 09:30 Fax (061) 298 2495 Okahandja A 21:55 Kuiseb D 19:20 Omaruru A 17:30 Kuiseb D 14:30 Sundays 15:30 to 19:00 D 22:05 Swakopmund A 20:35 D 18:30 Swakopmund A 15:50 Website : www.transnamib.com.na Karibib D 00:40 D 20:45 Kranzberg A 19:55 D 16:00 StarLine Information : E-mail : [email protected] Kranzberg
    [Show full text]
  • For Proposed Exploration of Dimension Stone on EPL 5161, Erongo Region, Namibia
    Environmental Assessment and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for proposed exploration of dimension stone on EPL 5161, Erongo Region, Namibia Date: 04 June 2020 Ecc App No.: APP-001762 Prepared for: Best Cheer Investments Namibia (Pty) Ltd Prepared by: OMAVI Geotechnical & Geo-Environmental Consultants CC (OGGC) Tel.: +264 81 300 3872 or +264 81 478 6303 Email: [email protected] 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Best Cheer Investments Namibia (Pty) Ltd (the client or Best Cheer hereafter) intends to carry out exploration activities to investigate the potential of granites and granitoid bodies on Exclusive Prospecting License (EPL) no. 5161, for use as dimension stones. The EPL is located about 25 km northeast of Arandis and covers an area of about 5059 ha. The area falls under the Karibib Constituency jurisdiction and extends across three (3) commercial farms namely Vergenoeg (no. 92), Valencia (no. 122), Namibplaas (no. 93) and one (1) communal farm Trekkopje (no. 120), however work will focus on Farm Trekkopje, particularly the middle and western parts. In order to undertake these exploration activities, an environmental clearance certificate (ECC) is required in terms of the Environmental management Act (Act No.7 of 2007) and its 2012 EIA regulations. As such, Best Cheer appointed Omavi Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Consultants CC to conduct the necessary assessments including public participation, and prepare this environmental scoping assessment (ESA) report. Best Cheer intends to adopt a systematic prospecting approach starting with desktop study, which will mostly be office based, focusing on historical data, followed by field evaluation and mapping, whereby a qualified geologist will walk the area and map it to produce a geological map with rocks of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tells It All 1 CELEBRATING 25 YEARS of DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS
    1989 - 2014 1989 - 2014 tells it all 1 CELEBRATING 25 YEARS OF DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS Just over 25 years ago, Namibians went to the polls Elections are an essential element of democracy, but for the country’s first democratic elections which do not guarantee democracy. In this commemorative were held from 7 to 11 November 1989 in terms of publication, Celebrating 25 years of Democratic United Nations Security Council Resolution 435. Elections, the focus is not only on the elections held in The Constituent Assembly held its first session Namibia since 1989, but we also take an in-depth look a week after the United Nations Special at other democratic processes. Insightful analyses of Representative to Namibia, Martii Athisaari, essential elements of democracy are provided by analysts declared the elections free and fair. The who are regarded as experts on Namibian politics. 72-member Constituent Assembly faced a We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the FOREWORD seemingly impossible task – to draft a constitution European Union (EU), Hanns Seidel Foundation, Konrad for a young democracy within a very short time. However, Adenaur Stiftung (KAS), MTC, Pupkewitz Foundation within just 80 days the constitution was unanimously and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) adopted by the Constituent Assembly and has been for their financial support which has made this hailed internationally as a model constitution. publication possible. Independence followed on 21 March 1990 and a quarter We would also like to thank the contributing writers for of a century later, on 28 November 2014, Namibians their contributions to this publication. We appreciate the went to the polls for the 5th time since independence to time and effort they have taken! exercise their democratic right – to elect the leaders of their choice.
    [Show full text]
  • I~~I~ E a FD-992A-~N ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rte of the REPUBLIC of NAMIBIA
    Date Printed: 12/31/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 14 Tab Number: 30 Document Title: GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, R2,BO - NO 473, NO 25 Document Date: 1992 Document Country: NAM Document Language: ENG lFES ID: EL00103 F - B~I~~I~ E A FD-992A-~n ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rtE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R2,80 WINDHOEK - I September 1992 No. 473 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 25 Establishment of the boundaries of constituencies in Namibia ........ PROCLAMATION by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 25 1992 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES IN NAMIBIA Under the powers vested in me by section 4(2)( a) of the Regional Councils Act, 1992 (Act 22 of 1992), I hereby make known the boundaries of constituencies which have been fixed by the Delimitation Commission under the provisions of Article 106(1) of the Namibian Constitution in respect of the regions referred to in Proclamation 6 of 1992. - Given under my Hand and the Seal of the RepUblic of Namibia at Windhoek this 29th day of August, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-two. Sam Nujoma President BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT-IN-CABINET F Clifton White Resource Center International Foundation for Election Systems 2 Government Gazette I September 1992 No. 473 SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES REGION NO. I: KUNENE REGION compnsmg: Ruacana Constituency This Constituency is bounded on the north by the middle of the Kunene River from the said river's mouth upstream to the Ruacana Falls whence the boundary conforms with the demarcated international straight line east­ wards to Boundary Beacon 5; thence the boundary turns southwards and coincides with the straight line boundary common to the Kunene and Omusati Regions as far as line of latitude 18° S; thence along this line of latitude westwards to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the line of the coast in a general northerly direction to the mouth of the Kunene River.
    [Show full text]