DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Army Drill Sergeants' Response to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Recruits Marin Vesselinov Nikolov Walden University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Army Drill Sergeants' Response to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Recruits Marin Vesselinov Nikolov Walden University Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 U.S. Army Drill Sergeants' Response to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Recruits Marin Vesselinov Nikolov Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons, and the Public Policy Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Marin Nikolov has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Benedict DeDominicis, Committee Chairperson, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Gary Kelsey, Committee Member, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. John Walker, University Reviewer, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract U.S. Army Drill Sergeants’ Response to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Recruits by Marin Nikolov MS, University of Phoenix, 2013 BS, Old Dominion University, 2009 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration Walden University May 2017 Abstract Even with the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, the U.S. Army has seen increased cases of sexual harassment; sexual assault; and discrimination of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) service members by other service members. Despite this trend, few studies have explored the experiences of victims of sexual harassment and sexual assault of GLB recruits before, during, and after the repeal of the DADT policy. Using the bystander effect as the theoretical construct, the purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore the experiences and interactions with a sample of 11 drill sergeants (DSs) who witnessed GLB discrimination in order to gain insight on strategies to prevent sexual harassment and discrimination against GLB recruits. Interview data were inductively coded and subjected to a thematic analysis procedure. Key findings indicate that participants perceived a general support for GLB inclusion into the basic combat training environment, and participants were unaware of the high number of discharges of service members from the U.S. Army during the implementation of the DADT policy. Another important finding is that participants were supportive of GLB scenario-based training. Finally, the bystander effect was found to be the main reason participants failed to intervene when instances of discriminatory or abusive behavior was observed. Implications for positive social change can be realized in the U.S. Army through promoting awareness of GLB discrimination, its impact, and how DSs can lead the effort in preventing this sort of behavior against the GLB recruits. A key recommendation is for the U.S. Army to explore implementing scenario-based training for all recruits as part of this effort. U.S. Army Drill Sergeants’ Response to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Recruits by Marin Nikolov Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Administration Walden University May 2017 Acknowledgments I wish to thank faculty member Dr. Dedominicis, who is well-versed on issues of U.S. military studies and, in particular, the implications of gender and racial integration within the armed forces. He shared with me his vast knowledge of research tools and strategies. I would also like to thank Dr. Kelsey for his expert guidance in methodology with qualitative studies and his support throughout my dissertation process. His invaluable insight allowed me to navigate a process which would have been more difficult to complete had he not acted as my second committee member. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1 Background ....................................................................................................................3 The Adoption of DADT ........................................................................................ 11 Repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell........................................................................... 14 Discrimination....................................................................................................... 17 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................24 Research Questions ......................................................................................................30 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................30 Nature of the Study ......................................................................................................33 Definitions....................................................................................................................36 Assumptions .................................................................................................................41 Limitations ...................................................................................................................42 Significance..................................................................................................................42 Summary ......................................................................................................................45 Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................47 Literature Search Strategy............................................................................................48 The Drill Sergeant ........................................................................................................49 The Drill Sergeant Creed: ..................................................................................... 49 Selection ................................................................................................................ 50 Drill Sergeants and Platoon Sergeants .........................................................................52 Army Regulations 350-16 and 614-200 .......................................................................53 i Organizing Gender and Sexuality Within the Ranks ...................................................54 Executive Order .................................................................................................... 55 Desexualization of the U.S. Military .................................................................... 57 Gay Warfighter ..................................................................................................... 58 Tolerance............................................................................................................... 59 Sexual Identity ...................................................................................................... 66 Coming Out ........................................................................................................... 68 Predator ................................................................................................................. 75 U.S. Military Culture ...................................................................................................77 Policy...........................................................................................................................81 Psychiatric Screening ............................................................................................ 83 Army Regulation 635-200-Homosexuality ........................................................... 85 Army Regulation 600-200 .................................................................................... 87 Reporting............................................................................................................... 87 Title 10—654 ........................................................................................................ 89 Separation ....................................................................................................................90 Honorable .............................................................................................................. 91 General Discharge ................................................................................................. 91 Under Other Than Honorable Conditions ............................................................. 92 Leading to the Repeal ..................................................................................................92 Compatibility ........................................................................................................ 93 Unit Effectiveness ................................................................................................. 94 ii Family
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Entire Issue As
    Full schedule of PrideFest’s 25th anniver- sary events. Page 20 THE VOICE OF PROGRESS FOR WISCOnsin’s LGBT COMMUNITY May 31, 2012 | Vol. 3, No. 15 Today’s out gay military PHOTO: ADAM HORWITZ Navy group at Great Lakes boosts Pride, p. 4 NAACP: Mar- Countering anti- How Wisconsin Locals take Milwaukee’s gay Personal chefs riage equality is gay stigma in passed first gay center stage at Pride: A time- make outdoor a civil right, p. 6 Milwaukee, p. 8 rights law, p. 12 PrideFest, p. 19 line, p. 24 dining easy, p. 54 SHOW YOUR PRIDE AT THE POLLS – vOTE JUNE 5, P. 16 2 WISCONSINGAZETTE.COM | May 31, 2012 LGBT news with a twist WiGWAG By Lisa Neff & Louis Weisberg testant to compete Ohio, school district negoti- say to a student who is getting The industry, which is fighting in the Miss Uni- ated with Lambda Legal over bullied for being gay or lesbian?” standards to reduce harmful pol- verse Canada pag- a principal’s decision to ban a the organization asked in a state- lutants, advertised for the activ- eant reached the student from wearing a “Jesus ment. ists on Craigslist. penultimate round Is Not A Homophobe” T-shirt. before losing her The principal required the stu- BUT WHO IS SHE? PROUD DEBUT bid to win the title. Jenna dent to turn the shirt inside out You know the fight for equality Adam Lambert’s new album Talackova, 23, did leave the glitzy and ordered him not to wear it has reached a milestone when “Trespassing” debuted at No.
    [Show full text]
  • Something Changed: the Social and Legal Status of Homosexuality in America As Reported by the New York Times Lauren Berard
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2014 Something Changed: The Social and Legal Status of Homosexuality in America as Reported by the New York Times Lauren Berard Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] 1 Abstract: (homosexual, law, culture) Homosexuality, though proven to be a naturally occurring phenomenon, has been a recurring subject of controversy: for years, homosexuality was classified as a disease, labeling gay citizen as sick at best, perverts at worst. As recently as fifty years ago, seen the best reception an active homosexual could hope for was to be seen as having a terrible affliction which must be cured. Gay citizens were treated as second-class citizens, with every aspect of their lifestyles condemned by society and the government. This thesis is a history of the changing social and legal status of homosexuality in the United States, from the 1920's. Something certainly has changed, in law and society, and I propose to explore the change and to explain why and how it happened. 2 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE SOMETHING CHANGED: THE SOCIAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUALITY IN AMERICA AS REPORTED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES By LAUREN BERARD A thesis submitted to the Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice Theses and Dissertations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2014 3 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Lauren Berard defended on May 2, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • TT-Queer America-Podcast-Transcript-Episode-7-The-Other-War-With-Susan-K-Freeman.Pdf
    TEACHING TOLERANCE tolerance.org PODCAST TRANSCRIPT The Other War with Susan K. Freeman JOHN D’EMILIO As a baby-boom child in the 1950s, World War II was always a part of history. But for the adults around me, the war was very much a living memory. Everyone knew where they were when they learned about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and when they first heard about the dropping of an atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima. Fortunately, none of the men in my family were casualties of the war; none experienced serious injury. And so, despite its toll in human life, they could talk about the war in terms of American heroism and success. In the case of my family—and for many other white, working-class families as well—the war was also remembered for the benefits it provided at home. After the hard times of the Great Depression, suddenly all the adults in the family—except for the mothers with small children—were fully employed and saving money for that proverbial rainy day. My grandfather was able to buy a house for the first time. Marriages occurred in abundance after the war, and I and all my cousins were among the beneficiaries. We were the children of the baby boom, which the prosperity of the war years helped to make possible. And all around us were other families like ours, consisting of husbands and wives and their young children. The heroism of World War II and the prosperity it brought to those millions of baby-boom families are a central part of the accepted narrative of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • “Don't Ask, Don't Tell”: a History, Legacy, And
    “DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL”: A HISTORY, LEGACY, AND AFTERMATH by ALEXIS N. WANSAC A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Political Science in the College of Sciences and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2013 Thesis Chair: Dr. Aubrey Jewett ABSTRACT Though many believe some of the greatest military leaders of all time – from Alexander the Great to Julius Caesar – have engaged in sex acts with other males, and though certainly a very different political climate from that of ancient Greece or Rome, the United States military has historically never accepted homosexual sex acts within its own military, nor has the United States military accepted open homosexuals either until recently. This thesis focuses on the evolution of United States military policy towards homosexuals and the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy of the United States military in order to recommend a path that the United States can follow to provide an equal opportunity for success of openly homosexual service members. This research traces the history of policy towards homosexuality in the United States military up through the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and its repeal. This research discusses changing governmental policies towards homosexuals in the military, as well as changing public opinions about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. This research also outlines discharges under the policy, connecting changing public opinion to the policy’s eventual repeal. Through the analysis of statistics surrounding discharges, opinion surveys, and anecdotal evidence, this research evaluates the level of acceptance for openly homosexual service members in a post-DADT world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Everyday Heroes of World War II: Ordinary People Who Did Extraordinary Things
    The Everyday Heroes of World War II: Ordinary People Who Did Extraordinary Things Dr. Lynn Chun Ink Go For Broke National Education Center 2015 1 I could have done no different. I would not have known how. --Elizabeth Humbargar, on helping Japanese Americans during the war years, The Stockton Record, 1978 2 Introduction The history of the Japanese community in the US during World War II is often retold against the backdrop of the battlefields of Europe and Asia, where Nisei soldiers fought fiercely to prove their loyalty as Americans, or from within the confines of the incarceration centers, where Nikkei families struggled to lead a life of normalcy after being forcibly removed from their West Coast homes. Yet not only are the Nikkei wartime experiences as varied and multifaceted as the thousands of people who endured them, but they also involved many other individuals who were not of Japanese descent, people who, like schoolteacher Elizabeth Humbargar, could do “no different” but join in the struggle. The Japanese community as a whole rallied together in support of one other. But there were also countless individuals outside of this tightly knit community who either on their own or within a group sought fair and just treatment for the Nikkei. They were everyday people—from ministers to teachers to farmers to teenagers—who often endured condemnation from others who viewed those of Japanese descent through eyes clouded by hatred, fear and suspicion. They were ordinary people who took extraordinary measures for people they viewed as their equals and more significantly, as their friends.
    [Show full text]
  • On Shifting Ground: the Women Airforce Service Pilots
    ON SHIFTING GROUND: THE WOMEN AIRFORCE SERVICE PILOTS OF WWII - PUBLIC IMAGES, PRIVATE REALITIES, AND THE BURDENS OF LASTING PROGRESS _______________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University _______________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Women’s Studies _______________ by Kimberly Ann Enderle Summer 2018 iii Copyright © 2018 by Kimberly Ann Enderle All Rights Reserved iv DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to the 1,102 Women Airforce Service Pilots of World War II, who demonstrated unselfish passion, resiliency, courage, and commitment while accomplishing something no women had been allowed to do before – fly U.S. military aircraft. This thesis celebrates these courageous female aviators who volunteered to serve their nation during World War II, and to risk it all: their lives, their personal and professional reputations, simply for the opportunity to become the United States’ first women military aviators. This thesis is specifically dedicated to the five women that opened their hearts and their homes to me, who willingly shared their intimate life stories with me, and trusted me to tell their unvarnished stories: Beverly Loyola (Beesie) Beesemyer, Florence “Shutsy” Reynolds, Barbara (Bobbi) Willis Heinrich, Millicent (Millie) Amanda Peterson Young and Jean Landis. Without their generosity, patience, and kindness none of this would have been possible. In the 1940s these women bravely challenged prevailing notion that women were second class citizens, informed by patriarchy and were ultimately deemed “unnecessary and undesirable” by Congressman Robert C.W. Ramspeck (D-GA) who sought to discredit them. Some in society labeled them unfeminine, promiscuous, perverse or immoral, and some defied heterosexual norms simply because they chose to pursue their love of flight which was perceived to transgress gender roles and eschew societal norms.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ Rights Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the U.S
    CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 SPRING 2021 ISSUE: 007 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL LGBTQ Rights Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the U.S. 2 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the United States: LGBTQ Rights Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University January 6, 2021 John Shattuck Carr Center Senior Fellow; Former US Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; Professor of Practice, Fletcher School, Tufts University Mathias Risse Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director for the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Timothy Patrick McCarthy Adjunct Lecturer in Public Policy The authors’ institutional affiliations are provided for purposes of author identification, not as indications of institutional endorsement of the report. This report is part of a Carr Center project on Reimagining Rights and Responsibilities in the United States, directed by John Shattuck. The project has been overseen by a faculty committee chaired by Mathias Risse, with the collaboration of Executive Director Sushma Raman, and the support of the Carr Center staff. This research paper was drafted by Diego Garcia Blum, and Sam Barrak. The authors are grateful to Michael Blanding and Mayumi Cornejo for editing, and Alexandra Geller for editorial and design. Cover image of Stonewall Inn by Ryan McGrady. CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY 1 Table of Contents 2. I. Overview The Stonewall Generation The AIDS Generation 5 . II. Achievements Full Achievements Partial Achievements 13. III. Current Struggles 23. IV. Policy Recommendations 2 CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY I.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School Certificate for Approving The
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Jewerl Maxwell Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________ Director Dr. Ryan Barilleaux __________________________________________ Reader Dr. Augustus Jones __________________________________________ Reader Dr. John Rothgeb __________________________________________ Graduate School Representative Dr. Allan Winkler Abstract In his 2001 text With a Stroke of a Pen, Kenneth Mayer contended, “Affirmative action – or the practice of granting preferences in employment, contracting, or education on the basis of race and gender – is largely a creature of executive action” (202). In spite of the substantial role played by America’s chief executives in enactment of such policies, with the exception of Mayer’s brief analysis in his chapter on civil rights, explanations regarding how and why presidents have enacted such policies have eluded presidency scholars. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to identify and explain the answer to the following questions: 1) To what extent have modern presidents used executive orders to establish federal affirmative action policy in the realm of equal employment opportunity for underrepresented groups in American society, prior to actions taken by other governmental institutions? 2) What factors explain presidential decision-making regarding executive orders pertaining to equal employment opportunity for underrepresented groups? To accomplish
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ+ People in Militaries, Wars and Post-War Settings
    LGBTQ+ People in Militaries, Wars and Post-War Settings Bibliography with Abstracts 2020 The Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights created this bibliography to provide a guide to the landscape of research-based knowledge of LGBTQ+ people in militaries, wars and post-war settings. Our goal is to provide the policy, activist and scholarly communities with improved access to the findings of academic research, as well as to a curated selection of non-academic resources. © 2020 Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights The Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights Bibliographic Resources Series http://genderandsecurity.org/projects-resources/bibliographic-resources Art and Artists’ Responses to Gender, Armed Conflict and Human Rights Climate and Ecological Crises: The Climate Crisis: Gendered Impacts, Women’s Agency, and Feminist Analyses Feminist Engagements with Green New Deals Food Security, Gender and the Climate Crisis Masculinities, the Environment, and Technological “Solutions” to the Climate Crisis Migration, Gender and the Climate Crisis Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) and Gender in Colombia / Desarme, desmovilización y reintegración (DDR) y Género en Colombia Selected English and Spanish Language Sources Ecofeminism Environmental Disasters: Gendered Impacts and Responses Extractive Industries: Gender Analyses Feminist Critiques of the Sustainable Development Goals Feminist Foreign Policy Feminist Political Ecology and Feminist Ecological Economics Gender and Security in Afghanistan, India
    [Show full text]
  • Homo En USA.Pdf
    1 La homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos de América Ilustración 1: Swimming (1885), pintura al óleo de Thomas Eakins. Muchos representantes del movimiento LGBT norteamericano le dan en la actuali- dad un carácter homoerótico. 2 Este libro está basado en el artículo Homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos editado en Wikipedia, La enciclopedia libre, 2008 Disponible en <http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homose- xualidad_en_los_Estados_Unidos&oldid=17023955>. Autores de la versión original en alemán: Stilfehler / Nemissimo / Fg68at / GLGerman / Bhuck / Solicitor / GLGermann / Nicor / Kriegslüsterner / Henriette Fiebig Traducción y adaptación al español y ampliación: Ecelan / Raystorm / Martínhache / Lin linao / Ángel Luis Alfaro / Varano / Knorpel / Chien / Snakeyes / Netito777 Este libro está editado según la Licencia de documentación libre GNU Copyright (c) 2008 the authors. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back- Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". 3 Introducción La historia de la homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos es, hasta el siglo XX, la de personas que tenían que vivir su homosexualidad a escondidas, por temor a la persecución legal y al desprecio social. Debido a ese ocultamiento, para el que la lengua inglesa ha creado la expresión in the closet (`en el armario'), el estudio moderno de esta historia debe contentarse con fuentes insuficientes. El hecho afecta especialmente al estudio del lesbianismo hasta la mitad del siglo XX.
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Change: Toxic Masculiniity in the Post Modern United
    RESISTING CHANGE: TOXIC MASCULINIITY IN THE POST MODERN UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, (1980s-Present) by Joseph E. Webster A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF HISTORY University of Central Oklahoma May 2019 COPYRIGHT Joseph E. Webster May 2019 Acknowledgments Researching and writing Resisting Change: Toxic Masculinity in the Post-modern United States Armed Forces was a challenge unlike any I have encountered in my entire life. In the course of my research, I fell ill with bacterial meningitis which nearly cost me my life and resulted in permanent loss of hearing. I would like express my gratitude to my family, the community of scholars and fellow students at the University of Central Oklahoma, the physicians and staff at St. Anthony Hospital, Hearts for Hearing, and all of those who contributed directly or indirectly to the project. First of all, I would like to sincerely thank my graduate advisor and committee chair, Dr. Lindsey Churchill for her insight and guidance through the course of this work. With Dr. Churchill’s mentorship and expertise, I was able to motivate myself, not only educationally, but professionally as well. Dr. Katrina Lacher, who guided my research in the historiography of the subject of this thesis. Dr. Patricia Loughlin, the Chair of the History and Geography Department, has shown a valued perspective and provided analytical insight to assist with the research efforts throughout the entire process. I owe endless appreciation to many people who selflessly involved themselves in assisting me with this work. First, I offer my genuine gratitude to my thesis committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Supplemental Historical Table of Contents . vii Publisher’s Note. ix Editor’s Introduction. xi Contributors. xv Volume 1 Early Developments “On the Unjust Treatment of Homosexuals” . .5 Excerpts from The Drag. 20 Blue Discharge. 27 Missions and Purposes of the Mattachine Society. 35 Executive Order 10450—Security Requirements for Government Employment. 58 Excerpt from Sexual Behavior in the Human Female . 87 Purpose of the Daughters of Bilitis . .92 Giovanni’s Room. 111 One, Inc. v. Olesen. .118 Illinois State Code 1961 . 130 Coming Out First Issue of The Los Angeles Advocate. .149 Stonewall Riot Leaflet. 155 “Come Out!”. .161 Radicalesbians: “The Woman-Identified Woman” . .168 Statements by the American Psychological Association regarding Homosexuality . .179 “The Hope Speech”. 186 The Five Demands of the First National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights. 193 v Volume 2 Growing Ever Stronger “1,112 and Counting” . 203 Bowers v. Hardwick ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������215 ACT UP Founding Document and Speech . 226 Speech at the 1992 Democratic Convention . 237 Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������242 Dyke Manifesto . 256 Romer v. Evans ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������265
    [Show full text]