DOCSLIB.ORG

Cisco College Student Achievement Goals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cisco College Student Achievement Goals Cisco College Student Achievement Goals The mission of Cisco College is to provide high,quality learning opportunities that promote student success in an ever-changing global environment. To assist us in accomplishing that mission, we've established the following 4 student achievement and student retention goals: Goal #1: Cisco College will achieve an above median statewide ranking in all measures of student success. Our current performance against Goal #1: Cisco College has a achieved an above average ranking in 16 out of 18 measures of student success Goal #2: Cisco College will achieve an aggregate ranking across all measures of student success in the top 5 of mid-sized community colleges in the state. Our current performance against Goal #2: Cisco College is the # 1 ranked medium sized Texas college in terms of student success. Goal #3: Cisco College will achieve an aggregate ranking across all measures of student success in the top ten of community colleges in the state. Our current performance against Goal # 3: Cisco College is the # 2 ranked college in Texas in terms of student success. Goal #4: Cisco College will achieve an above median ranking in fall term to fall term retention of non-graduating students Cisco College had a below median retention rate for full-time students among mid-size Texas colleges for the 2012 academic, but we raised that rate to above median for the 2013 academic year. Our retention rate for part time students was above median for 2012 and 2013. The rankings referred to in our goals are determined based on the following measures of student success and student retention: Student Success Measures Measure 1: Percent % total academic students employed and/or enrolled Measure 2: Percent % total technical students employed and/or enrolled Measure 3: Licensure rates Measure 4: Average time to associate degree Measure 5: Average semester credit hours (SCH) attempted to obtain associate degree Measure 6: Rate of transfers to 4 year universities Measure 7: Math Texas Success Initiative (TSI) obligation met by developmental education students Measure 8: Completed college math course (developmental education students) Measure 9: Reading TSI obligation met by developmental education students Measure 10: Completed college reading course (developmental education students) Measure 11: Writing TSI obligation met by developmental education students Measure 12: Completed college writing course (developmental education students) Measure 13: Developmental education student graduation rate Measure 14: Non-development education student graduation rate Measure 15: Completed college math course (non,developmental education students) Measure 16: Completed college reading course (non,developmental education students) Measure 17: Completed college writing course (non developmental education students) Measure 18: Percent % earned baccalaureate in4 years or less by dual credit students Measures of Student Retention: Measure 1: Full time student retention rate Measure 2: Part time student retention rate Our ranking methodology: Our ranking methodology is based on the "Olympic Medal Ranking Scheme" wherein a point value of 1 is assigned to a first place rank, 2 points to second place, 3 points to 3rd place, etc. The competitor with the lowest number of total points wins. We applied this scheme to certified comparative data provided by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board in the Texas Public Higher Education Almanac to calculate aggregate rankings of medium sized Texas colleges and all colleges statewide. Summary and Detail data on our performance against student achievement goals is provided on the following pages Cisco College Statewide and Peer Group Student Achievement Ranking For the 2012 - 2013 Academic Year Rankings are based on certified Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Higher Education Almanac Data Medium Peer Cisco College Group Statewide Our Rank out of 22 schools in Our the Statewide Best in Our Medium Rank out of Peer Best in Statewide Measure of Student Success Performance Peer Group 85 schools Group State Average Overall Rank 1 2 1 % total academic students employed and/or enrolled 91.90% 7 30 96.40% 100.00% 88.90% 2 % total technical students employed and/or enrolled 89.30% 15 48 97.10% 99.00% 89.60% See Note 1 3 Technical student licensure rates 93.00% ? ? ? ? ? See Note 2 4 Average time to associate degree 3.6 years 2 7 3.5 years 2.5 years 4.4 years 5 Average SCH* attempted to obtain associate degree 74 SCH 1 2 74 SCH 70 SCH 91 SCH 6 Rate of transfers to 4 year universities 27.40% 6 23 35.70% 44.80% 25.40% 7 Math TSI obligation met by developmental ed students 40.20% 8 29 59.30% 85.00% 39.30% 8 Completed college math course (deved students) 21.10% 4 19 29.60% 38.00% 17.50% 9 Reading TSI obligation met by developmental ed students 80.20% 1 3 80.20% 89.50% 55.90% 10 Completed college reading course (deved students) 53.80% 2 7 54.20% 87.40% 38.30% 11 Writing TSI obligation met by developmental ed students 75.50% 1 3 75.50% 88.20% 48.70% 12 Completed college writing course (deved students) 48.40% 1 7 48.40% 86.40% 32.90% 13 Developmental ed student graduation rate 11.50% 8 24 17.70% 31.00% 9.40% 14 Non-developmental ed student graduation rate 17.60% 16 55 28.70% 41.40% 18.70% See Note 3 15 Non-dev ed student college math completion rate 53.90% ? ? ? ? ? See Note 2 16 Non-dev ed student college reading completion rate 73.70% ? ? ? ? ? See Note 2 17 Non-dev ed student college writing completion rate 75.00% ? ? ? ? ? See Note 2 18 % earned bacc. in 4 years or fewer by dual credit students 42.50% 1 5 42.50% 46.40% 30.30% *SCH = Semester Credit Hours Legend: = ranking in the top 5 midsize colleges, ranking in the top 10 colleges statewide = above average = below the statewide average Notes: Note 1 - Employment rates are calculated by the Texas Higher Ed Coordinating Board based on state tax and workmen's compensation data. We are analyzing the THECB employment rate data for our technical students because it doesn't correspond with our in-house data which indicates a higher employment rate. Note 2 - It is our intent over the longer term to include comparative data for all 18 student achievement measures in our rankings. At present, the Texas Higher Ed Coordinating Board does not provide comparative data in an easily accessible form for measures 3,15,16 and 17. When comparative data becomes available for these measures, we will include it in our rankings. Our cursory examination indicates that inclusion of these additional measures will not result in significant changes to the overall rankings. Note 3 - Our below average graduation rate for non-developmental education students may be attributable to students taking courses at Cisco College before moving on to one of the 3 excellent private universities in Abilene. Private universities are not required to report graduation rates to the state. Rankings of Medium-size Texas Community Colleges by Retention Rates Fall 2012 First-time Student Cohort as of Fall 2013 Term Percent of students who graduate or return Retention Rates Retention Rates for Full-time Students for Part-time Students College 2012 Place Rank 2013* College 2012 Place Rank 2013* Victoria College 66% 1 1 Odessa College 68% 1 1 Lee College 63% 2 2 Trinity Valley Community College65% 2 2 Wharton County Junior College 63% 3 3 Angelina College 51% 3 3 Southwest Texas Junior College 58% 4 4 Victoria College 48% 4 4 Alvin Community College 54% 5 5 Wharton County Junior College 48% 4 5 Hill College 54% 5 6 Cisco College 47% 5 6 49% Kilgore College 52% 6 7 Kilgore College 47% 5 7 Paris Junior College 52% 6 8 Southwest Texas Junior College 47% 5 8 Odessa College 51% 7 9 Coastal Bend College 46% 6 9 McLennan Community College 48% 8 10 Alvin Community College 44% 7 10 Median College of the Mainland 47% 9 11 Lee College 44% 7 11 Weatherford College 46% 10 12 McLennan Community College 41% 8 12 Cisco College 45% 11 13 50% College of the Mainland 40% 9 13 Coastal Bend College 45% 11 14 Weatherford College 40% 9 14 Grayson College 44% 12 15 Paris Junior College 39% 10 15 Texarkana College 43% 13 16 Hill College 37% 11 16 Angelina College 42% 14 17 Temple College 36% 12 17 Temple College 42% 14 18 Grayson College 35% 13 18 Trinity Valley Community College 41% 15 19 Texarkana College 30% 14 19 Brazosport College unknown Brazosport College unknown Midland College unknown Midland College unknown Texas Southmost College unknown Texas Southmost College unknown Source of Data: US Dept of Education IPEDS Data Center Legend: Strength: Top 5 Ranking Above Median Ranking Weakness: Below Median Ranking *Comparable data on retention is not yet available for academic year 2013 Representative Performance Measures and Rankings Medium-sized Texas Community Colleges For the Academic Year Ending Spring 2013 Academic Technical Graduate Graduate Success Rates Success Rates All Student Success Rates Number of Average Student Average SCH* s in % total % total % total time to Average attempte Transfer academi academic % total technical Average associat SCH* d to cohort c employed technical employed time to e attempted obtain (Fall employe and/or employed and/or associate degree to obtain associate All 2007 Transfe d and/or enrolled and/or enrolled degree (yrs) associate degree transfer FTIC Transfe r rate 2-year public institution enrolled Rank enrolled Rank (yrs) Rank degree Rank s cohort) r rate Rank Alvin Community College 90.0% 15 93.9% 4 4.6 18 98 19 119 653 18.2% 19 Angelina College 91.8% 8 89.0% 16 4.3 12 94 18
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For 2017-2018
    GENERAL CATALOG FOR 2017-2018 Angelina County Junior College District (hereinafter: Angelina College) is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges to award associate degree levels – Associate in Arts, Associate in Science, Associate in Applied Science, and certificates. Contact the Commission on Colleges at 1866 Southern Lane, Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097 or call 404-679-4500 for questions about the accreditation of Angelina College. Accreditation Review Council on Education in Surgical Technology and Surgical Assisting American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers American Medical Technologists American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography American Society of Health System Pharmacists American Society of Phlebotomy Technicians Association of Texas Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Educational Programs Committee on Accreditation for Respiratory Care Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Professions Department of Transportation Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology National Health Career Association National Healthcare Association National Restaurant Association Nurse Aide Competency Evaluation Service Texas Board of Nursing Texas Board of Private Security Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Commission on Fire Protection Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Texas Commission on Private Security Texas Department of State Health Services Texas Department on Aging & Disability Services Texas Education Agency Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Texas Real Estate Commission Texas State Board of Public Accountancy Texas State Fire Marshals Association Texas Workforce Commission U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Angelina College does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, gender, age, creed, national origin, veteran status, or disabilities, and is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Achievement Summary 2017-2018
    Student Achievement Summary 2017-2018 Laredo College is an institution committed to student success by providing comprehensive educational services that focus on the dynamic requirements and needs of its local, regional, and international community. The College assesses student achievement using a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) that are published annually in the institution’s Student Success Report Card. Results are compared to the College’s Peer Group as defined by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, as shown in the Rank column. The status of each KPI is indicated by a color: = Target Met = Opportunity for Improvement = Attention Needed PEER KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RESULT* STATUS GROUP RANK SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS SPRING SPRING SPRING 2016 2017 2018 The percentage of students who maintained a ‘C’ average after their first year at LCC. NA 81.70% 80.10% 77% FALL FALL FALL SUCCESS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics 2nd The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 42.40% 47.90% 54.40% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Reading 7th The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 58.40% 48.10% 55.10% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Writing 8th The percent of underprepared students attempting developmental education who 50.70% 47.40% 48.40% satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. SUCCESS IN GATEWAY COURSES FALL FALL FALL 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics 3rd The percent of prepared and underprepared students who successfully 42.97% 43.78% 46.54% complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing. Reading 7th The percent of prepared and underprepared students who successfully 55.13% 58.11% 56.47% complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Resumes Accountability System Definitions Institution Home Page
    Online Resume for Prospective Students, Parents and the Public CISCO COLLEGE Location: Cisco, Northwest Region Medium Accountability Peer Group: Alvin Community College, Angelina College, Brazosport College, Coastal Bend College, College of The Mainland, Grayson County College, Hill College, Kilgore College, Lee College, McLennan Community College, Midland College, Odessa College, Paris Junior College, Southwest Texas Junior College, Temple College, Texarkana College, Texas Southmost College, Trinity Valley Community College, Victoria College, Weatherford College, Wharton County Junior College Degrees Offered: Associate's, Certificate 1, Certificate 2 Institutional Resumes Accountability System Definitions Institution Home Page Enrollment Costs Institution Peer Group Avg. Average Annual Total Academic Costs for Resident Race/Ethnicity Fall 2016 % Total Fall 2016 % Total Undergraduate Student Taking 30 SCH, FY 2017 White 1,990 61.5% 2,498 46.4% Peer Group Hispanic 722 22.3% 1,992 37.0% Type of Cost Institution Average African American 318 9.8% 560 10.4% Asian/Pacific Isl. 78 2.4% 117 2.2% In-district Total Academic Cost $3,810 $2,564 International 37 1.1% 34 .6% Out-of-district Total Academic Cost $4,710 $3,977 Other & Unknown 93 2.9% 183 3.4% Off-campus Room & Board $4,438 $7,204 Total 3,238 100.0% 5,387 100.0% Cost of Books & Supplies $0 $1,591 Cost of Off-campus Transportation $5,776 $4,225 Financial Aid and Personal Expenses Total In-district Cost $14,024 $15,584 Institution Peer Group FY 2015 Percent Ave Amt Percent Avg Amt Total
    [Show full text]
  • Student Success Newsletter St
    February 2020 Volume 10, Issue 2 Student Success Newsletter St. Philip’s College, 1801 Martin Luther King Dr., San Antonio, TX 78203 St. Philip’s College - Southwest Campus, 800 Quintana Rd., San Antonio, TX 78211 Student Success Leadership Team Quality Enhancement Plan – Ethical Decision-Making Dr. Mordecai Brownlee St. Philip’s College is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). Part of Vice President for Student Success this process is the QEP (Quality Enhancement Plan) to promote student success. Our QEP topic is Ethical Decision-Making. Dr. Paul Machen, II QEP Focus: Ethical decision-making is the ability to connect Dean for Student Success values and choices to actions and consequences. QEP Goal: Students engage in specific measurable academic Christina Cortez activities to enhance their ethical decision-making skills. Dean for Student Success Ethical Decision-Making Process: * Stop and think to determine the facts. Editors: Rosalinda Rivas, Eitandria Tello * Identify the options. * Consider consequences for yourself and others. * Make an ethical choice and take appropriate action. MESSAGE FROM OUR VICE-PRESIDENT: Student Success in the SLC – MLK Campus For more information, contact Charleen Brammer at Happy February St. Philip’s College – 210-486-2468 or 210-486-2275. February is a time when we all begin to settle into our SLC 102 Point of Contact courses and have a better understanding of the demands SPC Safe SPACE Advocacy Center Sasha Wilhelm associated with the semester. It also is a great time to Counseling Services Sasha Wilhelm begin to diversify ourselves by participating in one of our Social Services Assistance Sasha Wilhelm many student organizations or signing-up to participate in Disability Services Maria Botello a service learning opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Salary Supplements at Public Higher Education Institutions and State Agencies April 2020 Report No
    A Report on Salary Supplements at Public Higher Education Institutions and State Agencies April 2020 Report No. 20-704 State Auditor’s Office reports are available on the Internet at http://www.sao.texas.gov/. A Report on Salary Supplements at Public Higher Education Institutions and State Agencies SAO Report No. 20-704 April 2020 Overall Conclusion Texas Government Code, Section 659.0201, requires public higher education institutions (including community colleges) and state Background Information agencies to collect and report information Each public higher education institution regarding gifts, grants, donations, or other (as defined by Section 61.003 of the considerations they receive for the purpose of Texas Education Code) and state agency providing salary supplements (see text box for is required to collect and report certain information related to gifts, grants, additional details). To facilitate that reporting, donations, or other considerations the State Auditor’s Office distributed a related to salary supplements provided questionnaire to 218 state entities: 137 public to employees. higher education institutions and 81 state The State Auditor is required to compile the reported information and submit a agencies in the executive branch of state report to the Legislature. government. All 218 state entities responded to Source: Texas Government Code, the questionnaire. Section 659.0201. (See Appendix 2.) Responses to the questionnaire were as follows: Seven public higher education institutions (five universities and two community colleges) reported that they received gifts, grants, donations, or other considerations during fiscal years 2017, 2018, or 2019 designated to be used as a salary supplement for a named person, position, or endowment of the higher education institution.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Hooper Board Meeting: January 2020 Report of 2019 NCLEX-RN® Examination Pass Rates for Prof
    Agenda Item: 3.2.8. Prepared by: J. Hooper Board Meeting: January 2020 Report of 2019 NCLEX-RN® Examination Pass Rates For Professional Nursing Education Programs Summary: The period between October 1 and ending September 30 is used for the purpose of determining programs’ NCLEX-RN® examination pass rates. The attached report provides final 2019 NCLEX- RN® examination pass rates of first time test-takers from the professional nursing education programs in Texas as well as for clinical competency assessment programs operated out-of-state, for the purpose of meeting requirements of HB 2950 passed during the 85th regular session of the Texas Legislature. Programs with an asterisk (*) are commended for their pass rates of 90% or above. New programs that have not had graduates are not included in the report. Rule 215.4(c) states that “Approval status is determined biennially by the Board on the basis of the program’s compliance audit, NCLEX-RN® examination pass rate, and other pertinent data”. Certificates of Approval are provided to all programs every two years and will be provided in 2020. Trends: The overall 2019 NCLEX-RN® examination pass rate for Texas programs is 91.90% (11,905/12,954), which is above the national average of 88.07%. The NCLEX-RN® passing standard was last raised by the NCSBN Board of Directors in December 2012 and made effective April 1, 2013, based upon findings in the RN Practice Analysis. Texas is one of three states with more than 10,000 first-time candidates for the NCLEX- RN® examination. The other two states are California and Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • SIG Two-Year Institutions
    Two-Year Institution Client List Since 1987, SIG has completed hundreds of assignments at colleges and universities across the United States and internationally. Engagements have ranged from ERP procurements, implementations, assessments, DBA support, and programming, to consulting and training, project management, temporary IT staffing, business process analysis, and IT planning. Following is a partial list of two-year institutions that SIG has had the opportunity to serve: ◼ Aims Community College, Colorado ◼ Community College of Philadelphia, ◼ Alamo Community College District, Texas Pennsylvania ◼ Allan Hancock Community College District, ◼ Compton Community College District, California California ◼ Antelope Valley College, California ◼ Contra Costa Community College District, ◼ Athens State University, Alabama California ◼ Barstow Community College District, ◼ Copper Mountain Community College, California California ◼ Barton County Community College, Kansas ◼ Cuesta College, California ◼ Blinn College, Texas ◼ Delaware Technical Community College, ◼ Bristol Community College, Massachusetts Terry Campus, Delaware ◼ Brunswick Community College, North ◼ Delgado Community College, Louisiana Carolina ◼ Eastern New Mexico University - Roswell, ◼ Butler Community College, Kansas New Mexico ◼ Cabrillo College, California ◼ El Paso Community College, Texas ◼ Central Arizona College, Arizona ◼ Feather River College, California ◼ Central Carolina Technical College, South ◼ Florida Keys Community College, Florida Carolina ◼ Florida SouthWestern
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Online Institutional Resume
    Online Resume for Prospective Students, Parents and the Public CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE Location: Killeen, Central Region Large Accountability Peer Group: Amarillo College, Blinn College District, Del Mar College, Laredo College, Navarro College, North Central Texas College, South Plains College, Tyler Junior College Degrees Offered: Associate's, Certificate 1, Certificate 2, Enhanced Skills Certificate Institutional Resumes Accountability System Definitions Institution Home Page Enrollment Costs Institution Peer Group Avg. Average Annual Total Academic Costs for Resident Race/Ethnicity Fall 2019 % Total Fall 2019 % Total Undergraduate Student Taking 30 SCH, FY 2020 White 3,062 32.3% 4,578 41.4% Peer Group Hispanic 2,711 28.6% 4,583 41.5% Type of Cost Institution Average African American 2,712 28.6% 1,207 10.9% Asian/Pacific Isl. 412 4.3% 253 2.3% In-district Total Academic Cost $2,700 $3,226 International 58 .6% 67 .6% Out-of-district Total Academic Cost $3,390 $4,891 Other & Unknown 537 5.7% 366 3.3% Off-campus Room & Board $5,485 $7,303 Total 9,492 100.0% 11,055 100.0% Cost of Books & Supplies $1,900 $1,588 Cost of Off-campus Transportation $3,394 $5,371 Financial Aid and Personal Expenses Total In-district Cost $13,479 $17,488 Institution Peer Group FY 2018 Percent Ave Amt Percent Avg Amt Total Out-of-district Cost $14,169 $19,153 Federal (Pell) Grants 26% $3,400 34% $4,032 Federal Student Loans 5% $1,989 18% $4,819 Federal, State, Institutional or Other 28% $3,629 42% $4,065 Grants Known by Institutions Degrees & Certificates Awarded
    [Show full text]
  • Nulldfr 2012 Report
    Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,500 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on students (enrollment and graduation rates), student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. Our goal is to produce a report that is useful to institutional executives and that may help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures provided in this report are those suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel. They were developed to provide selected indicators and data elements for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2011-12 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. Additional information about these indicators is provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. On the next page is a list of the institutions in your comparison group and the criteria used for their selection.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Houston-Clear Lake Transfer Student GPA Report
    University of Houston-Clear Lake Office of Institutional Research University of Houston-Clear Lake transfer student GPA report This report summarizes cumulative GPA information for UHCL transfer students including a summary of those whose last institution attended was an area Gulf Coast Consortium Community College. If variance exists when comparing these figures to other previously published reports, it is important to note that these data were extracted after final grades were submitted and data at the end of term generally decreases compared to the 12'th day census data. Definitions: Gulf Coast Consortium: Consists of Alvin Community College, Blinn College, Brazosport College, College of the Mainland, Galveston College, Houston Community College, Lee College, Lone Star College - North Harris, San Jacinto College 1, Victoria College and Wharton County Junior College. UHCL Undergrad: Gulf Coast Consortium plus all other transfer students. LT 3: Less than 3 (non-zero value ). The data is not displayed to protect confidential information. 0: No students recorded for that major. 1Prior to 2004 and again in Fall 2008 many San Jacinto students were listed as transfers from the Central campus instead of the North and South campuses. In 2008, San Jacinto implemented E (electronic) Transcripting and the three campuses cannot be easily distinguished. For this reason, OIR is now reporting San Jacinto College campuses combined Spring 2012 Cumulative GPA Number Mean College of GPA Students Alvin Community College 307 3.139 Blinn College 14 3.152
    [Show full text]
  • Success/Retention Activities
    Success/Retention Activities Participation Summary Data for All Institutions as of January 2, 2008 Number of Participating Institutions: 87 out of 120 (or 72.5%) Total Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2006: $21,437,067 Total Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2007: $27,000,636 Combined Funding for Participating Institutions for Academic Years 2006-2007: $48,437,703 Highest Funded Program in Academic Year 2006: $2,000,000 at University of Houston-Downtown University of Houston-Downtown Highest Funded Program in Academic Year 2007: $1,750,000 at Sam Houston State University Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2006: 311,621 Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Year 2007: 412,887 Combined Number of Students Served by Participating Institutions for Academic Years 2006-2007: 724,508 Participating Students Funding Institutions Served Academic Support 93 249,907 $16,993,054 Services Access to Faculty and 11 12,405 $1,261,653 Academic Advising Early-Alert Systems 15 43,245 $1,319,576 Extended Student 16 22,395 $1,875,975 Orientation Institution-Wide Diversity 7 25,702 $142,000 Programs/Activities Learner-Centered 12 41,374 $1,360,950 Teaching Qualitative and effective advisement and 20 72,588 $5,664,838 counseling system Student Success Courses 35 59,734 $6,491,587 or Bridge Programs Participating Institutions: Academic support services Alvin Community College Amarillo College Angelina College Angelo State University Brazosport College Cedar Valley College Clarendon College Del Mar College El Paso Community College District Frank Phillips College Hill College Howard College Howard College Lamar State College-Orange Lamar State College-Port Arthur Laredo Community College Midland College Midwestern State University Montgomery College North Lake College Odessa College Paris Junior College Ranger College Sam Houston State University San Antonio College St.
    [Show full text]
  • Volleyball Media Guide 2021 Schedule
    LEE♦- COLLEGE .......... ' REBELS & ..,........ REBELSa 2021 ROSTER 1 2 3 4 ASHLYNN LEWIS MARIAH ELLIS JULIANA DAVIS ALISHYA ROMAN FR • 6-1 • MB FR • 6-1 • MB FR • 5-5 •DS/L FR • 5-5 • OH Texas City, TX Russelville, AR Houston, TX Kailua, HI 5 6 7 8 9 GRACIE LEWIS SAMIYA HARRIS DEANNA SPELL SINA TOROSLU CIERRA GILBERT FR • 5-3 • DS/L SO • 5-8 • OH FR • 5-7 • DS/U SO • 6-0 • MB FR • 6-1 • MB League City, TX Detroit, MI Houston, TXs Stuttgart, Germany College Station, TX 10 11 12 13 LEA VENGHAUS IMARI WILSON TRINIDIE DAVIS JANNIE BLAKE FR • 5-7 • S FR • 5-11 • OH/OPP FR • 5-9 • OPP/S FR • 5-6 • S Senden, Germany Humble, TX San Antonio, TX Lā’ie, O’ahu HEAD COACH ASSISTANT COACH ATHLETIC TRAINER DANIELLE ABOLANLE CAITLIN ESSIX “BONDIE” BLACKMORE ONIPEDE 2 LADY REBELS 2021 SEASON LEE COLLEGE VOLLEYBALL MEDIA GUIDE 2021 SCHEDULE DAY DATE OPPONENT LOCATION TIME Saturday August 14 Dillard University Scrimmage New Orleans, LA 11:00 AM Saturday August 14 Pearl River Scrimmage New Orleans, LA 1:00 PM Tuesday August 17 Texas Southern Scrimmage Houston, TX 2:00 PM Friday August 20 Dallas College – Northlake Baytown, TX 1:00 PM Friday August 20 Fort Scott Community College Baytown, TX 5:00 PM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Cedar Valley Baytown, TX 11:00 AM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Mountain View Baytown, TX 1:00 PM Saturday August 21 Dallas College – Eastfeld Baytown, TX 5:00 PM Wednesday August 25 Dallas College – Mountain View Dallas, TX 6:00 PM Friday August 27 Pima Community College Arizona Western 9:00 AM (PT) Friday August 27 Glendale
    [Show full text]