DOCSLIB.ORG

Large-Scale Characterization of Sex Pheromone Communication Sys- Tems in Drosophila

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Large-Scale Characterization of Sex Pheromone Communication Sys- Tems in Drosophila bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.305854; this version posted September 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Large-scale characterization of sex pheromone communication sys- tems in Drosophila Mohammed A. Khallaf 1‡, Rongfeng Cui 2, Jerrit Weißflog 3, Aleš Svatoš 3, Hany K.M. Dweck 1,4, Dario Ric- cardo Valenzano 2, Bill S. Hansson 1†, and Markus Knaden 1†‡ Insects use sex pheromones as a reproductive isolating mechanism to attract conspecifics and repel het- erospecifics. Despite the profound knowledge of sex pheromones, little is known about the coevolutionary mechanisms and constraints on their production and detection. Using whole-genome sequences to infer the kinship among 99 drosophilids, we investigate how phylogenetic and chemical traits have interacted at a wide evolutionary timescale. Through a series of chemical syntheses and electrophysiological recordings, we identify 51 sex-specific compounds, many of which are detected via olfaction. Behavioral analyses reveal that many of the 42 male-specific compounds are transferred to the female during copulation and mediate female receptivity and/or male courtship inhibition. Measurement of phylogenetic signals demonstrates that sex pheromones and their cognate olfactory channels evolve rapidly and independently over evolutionary time to guarantee efficient intra- and inter-specific communication systems. Our results show how sexual isolation barriers between species can be reinforced by species-specific olfactory signals. Main blends of shared chemical compounds as a result of genetic similarities and biosynthetic pathways shared rganisms communicate with each other through by ancestry 7,8. This diversity in sex pheromone Oexchanging signals that include visual, acoustic, communication can become further affected by tactile and chemical (smell and taste) senses. The factors like geographical or host variations. For chemical sense is common in all organisms, from example, sympatric species develop pronounced bacteria to mammals, and therefore, regarded from an divergent communication systems to overcome the evolutionary perspective as the oldest one. Animals risk of hybridization, while the unimpeded divergence are surrounded by a world full of odors emitted from due to geographic barriers may lead to relaxed conspecific or heterospecific individuals, as well as accumulation of differences 9. Moreover, colonization from the environment. The ability to exchange and of a different host – an ecological adaptation – could decipher these signals has significant impact on a also lead to differential sex pheromones and new species’ success as odors help to avoid imminent ways of signal transmission and perception 10,11. threats and localize and judge food or potential Although many studies have reported the diversity mates. Olfactory systems have, therefore, evolved in of sex pheromones among related species, the a sophisticated way to meet the challenge of detecting evolutionary phylogenetic history of these traits and and discriminating a countless number of odorants. their detection systems remains obscure. While it is well established that, and how animals use Flies, like most animals, rely on odors for intra- and interspecific communication, the chemical cues to locate and choose an appropriate evolution of olfactory systems with respect to signal mating partner 1,12-14. For several reasons, flies within production and perception is poorly understood. the genus Drosophila represent ideal species to study One of the most crucial channels that the evolution and diversity of sex pheromones, as have been suggested to contribute to speciation are well as their associated behaviors. First, Drosophila the sex pheromone-sensing channels 1. Volatile sex species live in an extensive range of diverse habitats pheromones – airborne chemicals that stimulate across all climatic conditions, from deserts and caves sexual behaviors in the opposite sex – are the to mountains and forests 15. In these environments, primary signals that reinforce the isolation barriers drosophilids feed and breed on varied hosts such as between different species. These species-specific decaying fruits, slime fluxes, mushrooms, flowers, as signals often provide a full biography written in scent well as frog spawn 16. Second, sexual behaviors of molecules about the sender, such as information about drosophilid flies differ quantitatively and qualitatively reproductive and internal status. Diversification of sex 17, which may include nuptial gift donation 18, pheromones among species arises either via neutral partners’ song duet 19,20, territorial dating 20, or the drift, or via sexual, and/or natural selection 2-6. Closely release of an anal fluidic droplet 21. Third, the neural related species tend to use different pheromone processing of pheromones in the brain of some 1Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745, Jena, Germany. 2Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing and, CECAD Research Center at University of Cologne, D50931, Cologne, Germany. 3Group of Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745, Jena, Germany. 4Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, CT 06520, New Haven, USA. †These authors share senior authorship; ‡Correspondence: [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (M.A.K.) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.305854; this version posted September 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. drosophilids, especially D. melanogaster, is well we recovered four main clusters within the genus understood 22. Fourth, pheromone receptors are Drosophila. First, the Drosophila subgenus that narrowly tuned to fly odors 23 and expected to evolve contains five main groups (repleta, virilis, melanica, at fast rates to match the dramatic diversity of cardini, and immigrans groups); second, the Zaprionus pheromones among closely related species 5,24. Lastly, subgenus that includes Zaprionus indianus; third, out of the 52 classes of olfactory sensory neurons the Dorsilopha subgenus that includes D. busckii; (OSNs) in D. melanogaster 25, only four respond to fourth, the Sophophora subgenus that includes fly odors and are localized in a specific sensillum melanogaster, obscura, willistoni, and saltans groups type 26. Hence, the restricted number of orthologues, (Fig. 1a). that are always expressed in an easily identifiable roup melanica group a lis g and accessible sensillum type, represent promising viri ca RAxML bootstrap support r D.pseudotalamancana din = 100 i g candidates to study the coevolution of Drosophila ro up D.montana D.littoralis D.americana pheromones and their corresponding receptors. D.nannoptera D.lummei D.virilis D.bromeliae D.melanica D.euronotus D.gaucha D.paramelanica D.micromelanica D.robusta D.polychaeta D.repletoides Olfactory sexual communication in D. D.hydei Z.indianus D.mettleri D.acutilabella D.stalkeri D.arawakana p D.dunni u D.mercatorum D.ornatifrons o D.repleta melanogaster is arguably one of the best studied r D.tripunctata g D.pallidipennis a D.buzzatii i 27 t D.testacea m e D.hamatofila l D.putrida m p systems in animals , and is by a large part carried i e D.macrospina g r D.mulleri r D.quinaria a D.wheeleri D.palustris n s out through a single molecule, cis-vaccenyl acetate D.navojoa D.albomicans g r D.nasuta o 28 D.arizonae u Zaprionus 95 D.sulfurigaster p D.moj.mojavensis sophila (cVA) . This compound is produced exclusively by Dro 87 47 99 D.immigrans D.moj.wrigleyi 97 D.hypocausta D.moj.baja Root 99 D.sternopleuralis males and transferred to females during copulation, 97 D.funebris D.moj.sonorensis Colocasiomyini Dorsilopha D.busckii S.latifasciaeformis D.simulans which then reduces the attractiveness of the freshly 99 D.mauritiana S.lebanonensis a or D.sechellia 29 oph C.pararufithorax Soph D.melanogaster mated females . Moreover, cVA regulates multiple 92 C.procnemis 98 D.yakuba 96 95 D.sturtevanti 96 D.santomea behaviors: it induces sexual receptivity in virgin s D.saltans D.erecta a 98 98 l D.eugracilis t a D.suzukii 30-32 33 n D.neocordata s D.biarmipes females , elicits aggression in males , modulates g D.emarginata D.takahashii r o D.nebulosa D.fuyamai u 34 p D.willistoni D.elegans D.ficusphila oviposition behaviors , and acts as aggregation D.tsacasi w D.sucinea D.greeni il D.equinoxialis D.birchii li D.serrata s D.kikkawai 30,35 t D.asahinai o D.imaii D.lacteicornis D.rufa n D.auraria D.triauraria pheromone in presence of food . Despite the i D.paulistorumD.bifasciata g ro u p p D.azteca u D.guanche D.affinis ro D.subobscura g profound knowledge of cVA-induced behaviors in D. er st D.persimilis ga D.ananassae o D.bipectinata n ob la melanogaster, little is known about analogous stimuli sc e u D.pseudoobscura D.malerkotliana m ra gro 0.04 that regulate social and sexual behaviors in other up drosophilids. Here, we identify the sex pheromones b b’ and their roles in 99 species within the family 1 0.5 Drosophilidae, explore the evolution of pheromone 0 signaling systems with respect to phylogenetic −0.5 Correlation coefficient relationships, and highlight how sexual isolation −1 barriers between species are reinforced by olfactory signals. Whole-genome information-based phylogeny Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships and chemical varia- of 99 drosophilids tions among drosophilids (a) Phylogeny of 99 species within the family Drosophilidae inferred The genus Drosophila is arguably one of the most from 13,433,544 amino acids sites that represent 11,479 genes (See Supplementary Table 1 and Materials and Methods for details).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fed Males Increase Oviposition in Female Hawkmoths Via Non-Nutritive Direct Benefits
    Animal Behaviour 112 (2016) 111e118 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Fed males increase oviposition in female hawkmoths via non-nutritive direct benefits * Eran Levin a, , Chandreyee Mitra a, b, c, Goggy Davidowitz a, b a Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A. b Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A. c Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A. article info Direct benefits provided by males have large effects on the fitness of females and their offspring in many Article history: species. Here, we examined whether mating or feeding experience of male Carolina sphinx moths, Received 17 July 2015 Manduca sexta (Sphingidae), affects the quality of direct benefits that males provide to their mates. We Initial acceptance 24 August 2015 mated virgin females with fed and unfed, virgin and previously mated males. Feeding experience Final acceptance 13 October 2015 affected male mating success, spermatophore size and flight muscle size. In addition, females mated to Available online fed males laid more eggs than females mated to unfed males, and females mated to virgin males laid MS. number: A15-00612R more eggs than females mated to previously mated males. Using 13C-enriched glucose in the nectar of the fed males, we found that the second and third spermatophores of males were strongly labelled, but Keywords: this labelled glucose was not present either in the female's fat body or in her eggs. Therefore, although d13 C fed males provided females direct benefits from the sugar in the nectar, the sugar was not used as a fecundity nutrient by females.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Deceit by Worthless Donations in a Nuptial Gift-Giving Spider
    Current Zoology 60 (1): 43–51, 2014 Evolution of deceit by worthless donations in a nuptial gift-giving spider Paolo Giovanni GHISLANDI1, Maria J. ALBO1, 2, Cristina TUNI1, Trine BILDE1* 1 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark 2 Laboratorio de Etología, Ecología y Evolución, IIBCE, Uruguay Abstract Males of the nursery web spider Pisaura mirabilis usually offer an insect prey wrapped in white silk as a nuptial gift to facilitate copulation. Males exploit female foraging preferences in a sexual context as females feed on the gift during copula- tion. It is possible for males to copulate without a gift, however strong female preference for the gift leads to dramatically higher mating success for gift-giving males. Females are polyandrous, and gift-giving males achieve higher mating success, longer copulations, and increased sperm transfer that confer advantages in sperm competition. Intriguingly, field studies show that ap- proximately one third of males carry a worthless gift consisting of dry and empty insect exoskeletons or plant fragments wrapped in white silk. Silk wrapping disguises gift content and females are able to disclose gift content only after accepting and feeding on the gift, meanwhile males succeed in transferring sperm. The evolution of deceit by worthless gift donation may be favoured by strong intra-sexual competition and costs of gift-construction including prey capture, lost foraging opportunities and investment in silk wrapping. Females that receive empty worthless gifts terminate copulation sooner, which reduces sperm transfer and likely disadvantages males in sperm competition. The gift-giving trait may thus become a target of sexually antagonistic co-evolution, where deceit by worthless gifts leads to female resistance to the trait.
    [Show full text]
  • Worthless Donations: Male Deception and Female Counter Play in a Nuptial Gift-Giving Spider
    Albo et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:329 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/329 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Worthless donations: male deception and female counter play in a nuptial gift-giving spider Maria J Albo1,2*, Gudrun Winther1, Cristina Tuni1, Søren Toft1 and Trine Bilde1 Abstract Background: In nuptial gift-giving species, benefits of acquiring a mate may select for male deception by donation of worthless gifts. We investigated the effect of worthless gifts on mating success in the spider Pisaura mirabilis. Males usually offer an insect prey wrapped in silk; however, worthless gifts containing inedible items are reported. We tested male mating success in the following experimental groups: protein enriched fly gift (PG), regular fly gift (FG), worthless gift (WG), or no gift (NG). Results: Males that offered worthless gifts acquired similar mating success as males offering nutritional gifts, while males with no gift experienced reduced mating success. The results suggest that strong selection on the nuptial gift-giving trait facilitates male deception by donation of worthless gifts. Females terminated matings faster when males offered worthless donations; this demonstrate a cost of deception for the males as shorter matings lead to reduced sperm transfer and thus give the deceiving males a disadvantage in sperm competition. Conclusion: We propose that the gift wrapping trait allows males to exploit female foraging preference by disguising the gift content thus deceiving females into mating without acquiring direct benefits. Female preference for a genuine prey gift combined with control over mating duration, however, counteracts the male deception. Background the evolution of male “deception” by the use of token Differences in the evolutionary interests between the gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Animal Nuptial Gifts
    ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL. 44 The Evolution of Animal Nuptial Gifts Sara Lewis and Adam South department of biology, tufts university, medford, massachusetts, usa Rich gifts wax poor when givers prove unkind William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (3.1.101) I. INTRODUCTION A. WHAT ARE NUPTIAL GIFTS? Nuptial arrangements in many human cultures include gift-giving tradi- tions (Cronk and Dunham, 2007; Mehdi, 2003), and this behavior plays an important role in the mating systems of other creatures as well (Boggs, 1995; Fabre, 1918; Gwynne, 2008; Lack, 1940; Thornhill, 1976; Vahed, 1998, 2007; Zeh and Smith, 1985). In species widely distributed across the animal kingdom, males transfer many different non-gametic materials to females during courtship and mating. Such materials can include lipids, carbo- hydrates, proteins, peptides, amino acids, uric acid, minerals, water, anti- predator defensive compounds, anti-aphrodisiac pheromones, and neuroendocrine modulators of recipient physiology. These nuptial gifts are an important aspect of reproductive behavior and animal mating sys- tems (Andersson, 1994; Thornhill and Alcock, 1983). However, when com- pared to more conspicuous sexually selected traits such as male weaponry or ornamentation, such gifts have received relatively little attention from behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary research. Nuptial gifts heighten male reproductive investment, thus limiting male mating rates and altering courtship sex roles and sexual size dimorphism (Boggs, 1995; Gwynne and Simmons, 1990; Leimar et al., 1994). Selection acts on both gift-givers and receivers to shape nuptial gift structure and biochemical composition, as well as gift-giving behaviors. Not only do nuptial gifts form the basis for dynamic coevolutionary interactions between the sexes, but they also link 53 0065-3454/12 $35.00 Copyright 2012, Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection and Alternative Reproductive Tactics in the Nursery-Web Spider Pisaura Mirabilis
    Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi PhD Thesis Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi SpiderLab Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Department of Bioscience Faculty of Science and Technology Aarhus University November 2017 SUPERVISORS: Prof. Trine Bilde Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark Dr. Cristina Tuni Department Biologie II, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Germany CREDITS: Photos: Paolo Ghislandi SpiderLab Logo: Lena Grinsted CITE AS: Ghislandi P.G. (2017). Sexual selection and alternative reproductive tactics in the nursery- web spider Pisaura mirabilis. Ph.D. dissertation. Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark NUMBER OF PAGES: 103 PRINTED BY: Fællestrykkeriet – SUN, Aarhus University Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….........1 Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Resumé………………………………………………………………………………………….........5 State of the ART……………………………………………………………………………………7 Reproductive tactics in the nursery-web spider Pisaura mirabilis……………………...………11 Types of ARTs: fixed or plastic traits?...........................................................................................15 Which ecological drivers influence the expression and maintenance of ARTs?........................20 References………………………………………………………………………………………….23 Chapter I - Behavioural plasticity and
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Sex; Sexual Selection
    Some traits are difficult to view as adaptations, because they Darwin asked: appear to provide a disadvantage to the organism Can natural selection explain these differences? • Structural traits: cumbersome antlers or excessively long tailfeathers (make movement difficult); bright, flashy colors (make the organism more visible to predators) • Behavioral traits: aggression within a species, particularly among members of the same sex (e.g. fighting among males) Darwin realized that these and other traits don’t make sense under natural selection. They are often: sexually dimorphic (limited to one sex, typically males); expressed only in the breeding season; or not expressed in immature individuals Some observations • There are sexually dimorphic traits that don’t Males improve success in survival or copulation • They are often not expressed outside of the breeding season Females • They are often not expressed until maturity Birds of paradise 1 Stag beetles 2 Components of fitness Darwin proposed a theory of sexual selection, a special case of natural selection: Compatibility ZYGOTES Viability Sexual selection is, specifically, selection caused by competition between individuals of the same sex (usually males) for access to mates, resulting in differential reproductive success GAMETES JUVENILES Since transmitting genes to next generation requires survival Males Females and reproduction, traits can be selected for if they increase mating success, even if they decrease survival This explains the selection for seemingly disadvantageous ADULTS
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Nuptial Gifts and Its Coevolutionary Dynamics With
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.165837; this version posted June 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Evolution of nuptial gifts and its coevolutionary dynamics with 2 "masculine" female traits for multiple mating 3 4 Yoshitaka KAMIMURA1*, Kazunori YOSHIZAWA2, Charles LIENHARD3, 5 Rodrigo L. FERREIRA4, and Jun ABE5 6 7 1 Department of Biology, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan. 8 2 Systematic Entomology, School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060- 9 8589, Japan. 10 3 Geneva Natural History Museum, CP 6434, CH-1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland. 11 4 Biology Department, Federal University of Lavras, CEP 37200-000 Lavras (MG), 12 Brazil. 13 5 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Meijigakuin University, Yokohama, Japan 14 15 Correspondence: Yoshitaka Kamimura, Department of Biology, Keio University, 16 Yokohama 223-8521, Japan. 17 Email: [email protected] 18 19 Short title: Trading between male nuptial gifts and female multiple mating 20 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.165837; this version posted June 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 21 ABSTRACT 22 Many male animals donate nutritive materials during courtship or mating to their female 23 mates. Donation of large-sized gifts, though costly to prepare, can result in increased 24 sperm transfer during mating and delayed remating of the females, resulting in a higher 25 paternity Nuptial gifting sometimes causes severe female-female competition for 26 obtaining gifts (i.e., sex-role reversal in mate competition) and female polyandry, 27 changing the intensity of sperm competition and the resultant paternity gains.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Behavior in the Bed Bug (Cimex Lectularius)
    Reproductive Behavior in the Bed Bug (Cimex lectularius) Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Scott Atlee Harrison, B.S. Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2016 Master’s Examination Committee: Dr. Susan N. Gershman, Advisor Dr. Susan C. Jones Dr. J. Andrew Roberts Copyright by Scott Atlee Harrison 2016 i Abstract The common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, has resurged in the last 20 years, renewing interest in understanding the biology of this pest. Although much is known about chemical communication in bed bugs, there have been no studies on sexual selection in this species. In this thesis, I have explored reproductive behavior and the possibility of sexual selection in bed bugs and conducted four behavioral experiments to determine I) where bed bugs are most likely to mate, II) how feeding and mating status influence female attraction to harborages, III) the effect of male feeding status on male mating success, and IV) the effects of inbreeding and outbreeding on fitness, and if females exercise mate choice for non-relatives. I found that bed bugs were most likely to mate in a harborage or near the blood feeder than in the open. There was some evidence that feeding status had a positive correlation with harborage attraction. There was a trend for virgin females to be more attracted to harborages than mated females, but it was not statistically significant. Replete (fed) female bugs may be seeking refuge to digest and oviposit while virgin females may be seeking mating opportunities at the harborage.
    [Show full text]
  • August 1986 Vol. 31, No. 3
    NEWSLETTER Vol. 31, No.3 August, 1986 Animal Behavior Society A quarterly publication Terrv Christenson, ABS Secretary Jav Hansc/le, Associate Editor, ABS Ne'wsletter Department oj Psychology, Tlllane University, New Orleans. LA 70118 NEW ABS FELLOW BALLOT ENCLOSED FOR ABS ELECTION Devra Kleiman has been elected Fellow of the Society. Devra Biographic information on the candidates for Second President­ served as ABS President during the 1983-84 term. She is Elect, Secretary, and Member-at-Large and information currently the Assistant Director for Research at the National concerning the Constitutional amendment can be found on pages Zoological Park in Washington D,C, 4 and 5 of this Newsletter, BALLOT IS ON PAGE 5. Please respond; generally only a small percentage of the membership ALLEE STUDENT COMPETITION AWARD votes. The winner of the 1986 Allee competition for the best student NATURE CONSERVANCY CALL FOR HELP paper presented at the annual convention was Mary Victoria McDonald, Dept of Zoology, University of Florida for the paper Your help is needed to increase tfie amount of protected dry entitled "Vocalizations and reproductive behavior in seaside tropical forest in Guanacaste province of Costa Rica. In total, sparrows". The runner-up was Eldridge S, Adams, Department only 147 square miles of this unique forest type are protected, of Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, A total of 15 Currently, 39 square miles are protected m Guanacaste, Allee papers were presented in competition at the Tucson however, more area in the moister upland is needed to buffer the meetings. severely threatened dry forest from normal environmental flucuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine's Day in the Arthropod World
    It’s the thought that counts: valentine’s day in the arthropod world William Rennison, Harper Adams University Everybody wants to make their special someone feel adored come Valentine’s day and it’s not often you go far wrong with gifting the classic box of chocolates or flowers. Insects and arachnids are also partial to these romantic gestures and appreciate when an ambitious male can bring something else to the table (sometimes literally!). The tokens offered by males to females are called ‘nuptial gifts’ and serve to increase a males chance of mating with a female…sound familiar? One hypothesis for the evolution of the nuptial gift is believed to be linked to mate choice. Nuptial gifts can act as an indicator of male fitness as there is a cost to hunting and not consuming prey and instead giving it away. This indicates to females that those with better gifts are likely to have better genes and produce stronger offspring [1,2]. An alternative hypothesis has been suggested for species prone to cannibalism. It is thought that the nuptial gift reduces the rate of sexual cannibalism as the male distracts the female with the gift as they mate [3]. Nuptial gifts are typically classified as either endogenous (produced by the male) or exogenous (collected by the male) [4]. Exogenous gifts are typically a prey item which the male has hunted or scavenged. Before attempting to mate with the female they will present this token to increase their chances of wooing her. Spiders which adopt this gift giving strategy will take the time to wrap the prey items in silk before they deliver the prey to the female.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Effects on Sexual Selection and Comparison Of
    NUTRIENT EFFECTS ON SEXUAL SELECTION AND COMPARISON OF MATING CALLS IN KATYDIDS (TETTIGONIIDAE) A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Lara Rae Trozzo May, 2013 Thesis written by Lara Rae Trozzo B.A., The Pennsylvania State University, 2010 Approved by ____________________________________________________ Patrick Lorch, Advisor ____________________________________________________ Mark Kershner, Member, Masters Thesis Committee ____________________________________________________ Sean Veney, Member, Masters Thesis Committee Accepted by ____________________________________________________ Laura Leff, Acting Chair, Department of Biological Sciences ____________________________________________________ Raymond Craig, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 13 Behavioral Patterns
    UNIT 13 BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS Structure 15.1 Introduction Objectives ' 15.2 Taxis and Kinesis Taxis Kinesis 15.3 Biological Rhythms Control of Biorhythms Biological Clock 15.4 Communication Behaviour Visual Signals Mechanical Signals Chemical Signals Communication among Honeybees, the Dance Language 15.5 Courtship Behaviour Need for ~ourtshipBehaviour Sex rlifferences in Courtship Behaviour V:sual, Mechanical and Chemical Displays Nuptial Gilts Sperm Competition and Mate Guarding Alternative Tactics of Mate Competition Rejection and Deceit in Courtship 15.6 Social Organisation in Insects Advantages and Disadvantages of Social Behaviour Social Wasps Ants Honey Bees Termites 15.7 Parasitism Types of Parasites Effects of Parasitism on Parasites 15.8 Summary 15.9 Terminal Questions 15.10 Answers INTRODUCTION Behavioural patterns of animals are the patterns of their gestures and movements in response to stimuli in their environment. Behaviour patterns are purposeful and may be for procurement of food, finding mate, for locating convenient and sheltered site, or 1 communication with animals belonging to the same species or to different species. When an animal moves its body in response to a stimulus, the movements are termed taxes and kineses. Behavioural activities occurring with clock work precision at regular intervals are called biorhythms. Elaborate ritualistic behaviour patterns are associated with courtship and mating, communication with members of one's own species as well with other species. Certain groups of animals live in groups to form societies and exhibit social behaviour. They also possess special means of communication with members of their own species. Some communication signals are for self defence. In this Unit you I shall learn about the various taxes and kineses, rhythms, social organisations, courtship I and communication behaviour and the behaviour of parasites, with reference to non ) chordates.
    [Show full text]