Slope Stability Analysis with the Shear Strength Reduction Method

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Slope Stability Analysis with the Shear Strength Reduction Method Ready for Prime Time: Slope Stability Analysis with the Shear Strength Reduction Method We believe that the SSR method, facilitated by its implementation in software, is ready for prime time, the point at which it can be applied to the practical, routine analysis of slopes. This article provides reasons why this is so, as well as providing practical guidelines for SSR modelling. Prime time generally refers to the Due to its ability to realistically model a evening hours between 7 and 11 p.m. very broad range of problems, the Finite when the largest audience watches Element Method (FEM) has become television. Because of what stands to be tremendously popular since it was first gained, TV networks fiercely compete applied to geotechnical engineering in for the attention of these viewers. Ad- 1966. For various reasons that will be vertising during this period is powerful. outlined in this article, its primary ap- A well executed ad can create positive plication in geotechnical engineering, brand recognition while a bad ad will though, had been restricted to stress turn customers off. Networks and ad- and deformation analysis of excavations vertisers go to great lengths to ensure and support. Recent refinements to the that shows and ads stand up to the SSR method, and advances in comput- scrutiny of discerning buyers, and it’s ing technology have now altered this in this sense that we believe the Shear landscape. Strength Reduction (SSR) method of slope stability analysis is ready for prime time: it will stand up to the scrutiny of the discerning geotechnical audience, and is therefore ready for routine slope analysis. Brief Description of SSR The central concept of the SSR method As was discussed in an article in the is very simple. Similar to limit-equi- Summer 2004 issue of RocNews, librium analysis, it involves successive Will Finite Elements Replace reductions (by some factors) in the shear Limit-Equilibrium in Slope Design? strengths of slope materials until failure powerful programs, which enable rou- occurs. Failure is indicated when the tine geotechnical finite element analysis, finite element model does not converge are available today. Phase2, Rocscience’s to a solution, because equilibrium can- two-dimensional FEM program, is a not be maintained. The critical factor at leader in this market. The program which failure occurs is taken to be the significantly reduces the amount of time factor of safety. required to build, compute and inter- pret models. Recent Advances in the Version 6 of Phase2 highly automates the SSR Method SSR procedure for calculating a factor of safety. In some cases, it is even easier to In the past, a number of factors limited use than conventional limit-equilibrium application of the SSR technique for analysis. In addition, the new Phase2 can routine slope stability analysis. These read Slide (Rocscience’s limit-equilib- included: rium slope stability program) files, and Lengthy modelling, compute, automatically convert them into fully and results analysis times meshed, finite element equivalents. The Lack of automated tools for perform- version includes algorithms, which make ing the successive changes to shear it possible to perform SSR analysis for strength non-linear material strength models, a A perceived hunger for material capability missing in practically all the input data, which were not collected other competing products. For more in routine site investigations, at least detail, see the article: not with reasonable accuracy Stability Analysis of Rock Slopes Restriction to linear material strength using the Finite Element Method (Mohr-Coulomb model), and Unproven reliability of SSR results The previous article explained that the additional data required for the SSR method is routinely collected for other forms of geotechnical analysis. As a Guidelines for SSR Modelling result the need for additional data does not overly complicate finite element In the course of verifying the reliability slope stability analysis. of the SSR method, we studied various aspects of finite element slope stability The Summer 2004 RocNews article also analysis and compiled a set of modelling addressed the question of the reliabil- guidelines. These guidelines are espe- ity of SSR results, and listed references, cially useful, since FEM slope stability which report good agreement between analysis is still new to many geotechni- SSR and limit-equilibrium results. To cal engineers, and generally requires further increase confidence in the SSR more modelling know-how than limit- technique, we tested the method on 33 equilibrium analysis. benchmark slope examples. These cases, which cover a broad range of material We studied the impact of Young’s mod- and slope behaviours, have been used ulus, Poisson’s ratio, and dilation angle to verify the results of slope stability pro- on computed factor of safety values. grams, including Slide. Because the SSR factor of safety is deter- mined based on the occurrence of non- The results of our study were published convergence, aspects of finite element in a paper, modelling such as stopping rules (con- A Comparison of Finite Element Slope vergence criteria), number of iterations Stability Analysis with Conventional and tolerance, which influence solution Limit-Equilibrium Investigation convergence, were also investigated. presented at the recently concluded Although the compiled set of guidelines 58th conference of the Canadian Geo- is by no means an exhaustive list of how technical Society (CGS) in Saskatoon. to perform SSR analysis, it is still very The study confirmed what had been helpful to both experienced users and previously reported; in all the cases, the novices. SSR gave answers that agreed very well with limit-equilibrium results. The rules of thumb for replicating limit- are therefore required in addition to fac- equilibrium slope analysis with the SSR tor of safety values, then effort must be method can be summarized as follows: made to specify the right estimates of these properties. Assume a single Young’s modulus and a single Poisson’s ratio for slope In addition, for multiple material slope materials models the ratios of the different Assume a zero dilation angle Young’s moduli can affect deforma- tion patterns. In some instances differ- Assign all materials elastic-perfectly ent stiffness ratios can produce failure plastic behaviour mechanisms that differ from limit equi- Use six-noded triangular or other librium solutions. The images on the higher-order elements. For a given following page show the different shear number of nodes higher-order ele- deformation contours at failure that ments are generally more efficient arise in a slope for two different sets of (produce results that are closer to Young’s moduli for the material layers. the ‘true’ solution) Although the factor of safety values are Begin with smaller number of el- very similar for the two cases, the failure ements. Refine model (increase mechanisms differ. number of elements) once you’ve obtained a good handle on a slope This has implications for the design (lo- problem, and cation and capacity) of support or other remedial measures for multiple material Check the sensitivity of results to slopes. For example, if support deforma- number of elements tions are required, then it is important We would like to note that the defor- to assign adequate estimates of Young’s mation parameters (Young’s modulus, moduli and Poisson’s ratios. Poission’s ratio and dilation angle) in- fluence the magnitudes of computed deformations. If deformations at failure These contours of maximum shear strain indicate two different failure mechanisms for a multi-material slope. The difference in failure mode is caused by changing the Young’s moduli of the material layers. Prime Time Ready We believe that SSR technology has The SSR method has been found to improved to the point where it is ready work in cases in which limit-equilibrium for prime time use, the practical, routine analysis either produces misleading analysis of slopes. As has been reported results or does not work well. One such by others and as confirmed by our tests example involves analysis of the stability on several slope cases, the SSR method of slopes in which excavations such as produces reliable and consistent results tunnels and caverns have been made. over a wide range of slope problems. Whereas limit-equilibrium methods, due It matches powerful limit-equilibrium to their inability to model stress-strain features such as the ability to model behaviour, encounter difficulties on such non-linear strength, and accommodate problems, the SSR method smoothly multiple slope materials and support analyzes these cases. types. In programs like Phase2, the SSR We advocate for greater use of the SSR, has been automated to the same levels since it powerfully complements con- as those found in premier slope stability ventional limit-equilibrium analysis. The programs. tools for performing such slope analysis The SSR enjoys several advantages over are available. Why not use them? conventional limit-equilibrium analysis. Among many desirable attributes, SSR slope analysis can produce insights into We encourage readers to send failure mechanisms, and their formation, their comments and views on this topic to RocNews Feedback. in ways that may not be as evident in limit-equilibrium analysis. SSR analysis can better model the behaviour of sup- port elements, the interactions caused by the relative stiffnesses of slope ma- terials and support elements, and can indicate deformations at failure..
Recommended publications
  • Water Well Drilling for the Prospective Owner
    WATER WELL DRILLING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE WELL OWNER (INDIVIDUAL, DOMESTIC USE) WATER WELL DRILLING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE WELL OWNER (INDIVIDUAL, DOMESTIC USE) This pamphlet was compiled by the Board of Water Well Contractors primarily to assist prospective owners of non-public wells. While much of the information is also useful for community, multi-family, or public water supply wells; there are additional considerations, not discussed in this publication, that need to be addressed. If you are the current or prospective owner of a community, multi- family, or public water supply well; please contact the Dept. of Environmental Quality, Public Water Supply Division for assistance. Contact information can be found at the end of this publication. Revised 2007 How Much Water Do I Need? You will need a dependable water supply for your present and future uses. An average household uses approximately 200-400 gallons of water per day. For a family of four, this means that a domestic well should provide a dependable yield of 10 to 25 gallons per minute (gpm) to adequately supply all needs, including lawn and garden watering. Much smaller yields may be acceptable, if adequate storage tanks are used. Most mortgage companies require a well yield of at least 5 gpm. More specific information is available from county sanitarians, engineering firms, water well contractors, or pump installers. Before you have your well drilled, find out from a local drilling contractor, the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC), or the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) how much water can be produced from the aquifers in your area, the chemical quality of that water, and the depth to the water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Well Foundation Is the Most Commonly Adopted Foundation for Major Bridges in India
    Well foundation is the most commonly adopted foundation for major bridges in India. Since then many major bridges across wide rivers have been founded on wells. Well foundation is preferable to pile foundation when foundation has to resist large lateral forces. The construction principles of well foundation are similar to the conventional wells sunk for underground water. But relatively rigid and engineering behaviour. Well foundations have been used in India for centuries. The famous Taj Mahal at Agra stands on well foundation. To know the construction of well foundation. To know the different types and shapes of well foundations. To know which type of well foundation is suitable for different types of soil strata. Wells have different shapes and accordingly they are named as:- 1. Circular well, 2. Double D well, 3. Twin circular well, 4. Double octagonal well, 5. Rectangular well. . Open caisson or well Well Box Caisson Pneumatic Caisson Open caisson or well: The top and bottom of the caisson is open during construction. It may have any shape in plan. Box caisson: It is open at the top but closed at the bottom. Pneumatic caisson: It has a working chamber at the bottom of the caisson which is kept dry by forcing out water under pressure, thus permitting excavation under dry conditions. . Well foundation construction in bouldery bed strata Pasighat Bridge Andhra Pradesh The Important Factors of the bridge were as follows.. Length of the bridge - 704 mts. Foundation:- i. Type -Circular Well. ii. Outer Diameter -11.7 mtrs. iii. Inner Dia. -6.64 mtrs iv. Steining thickness -2.53 mtrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Porosity and Permeability Lab
    Mrs. Keadle JH Science Porosity and Permeability Lab The terms porosity and permeability are related. porosity – the amount of empty space in a rock or other earth substance; this empty space is known as pore space. Porosity is how much water a substance can hold. Porosity is usually stated as a percentage of the material’s total volume. permeability – is how well water flows through rock or other earth substance. Factors that affect permeability are how large the pores in the substance are and how well the particles fit together. Water flows between the spaces in the material. If the spaces are close together such as in clay based soils, the water will tend to cling to the material and not pass through it easily or quickly. If the spaces are large, such as in the gravel, the water passes through quickly. There are two other terms that are used with water: percolation and infiltration. percolation – the downward movement of water from the land surface into soil or porous rock. infiltration – when the water enters the soil surface after falling from the atmosphere. In this lab, we will test the permeability and porosity of sand, gravel, and soil. Hypothesis Which material do you think will have the highest permeability (fastest time)? ______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest permeability (slowest time)? _____________ Which material do you think will have the highest porosity (largest spaces)? _______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest porosity (smallest spaces)? _______________ 1 Porosity and Permeability Lab Mrs. Keadle JH Science Materials 2 large cups (one with hole in bottom) water marker pea gravel timer yard soil (not potting soil) calculator sand spoon or scraper Procedure for measuring porosity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Linktm Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet
    LinkTM Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet www.globalsynthetics.com.au Australian Company - Global Expertise Contents 1. Introduction to Link Gabions and Mattresses ................................................... 1 1.1 Brief history ...............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applications ..............................................................................................................................1 1.3 Features of woven mesh Link Gabion and Mattress structures ...............................................2 1.4 Product characteristics of Link Gabions and Mattresses .........................................................2 2. Link Gabions and Mattresses .............................................................................. 4 2.1 Types of Link Gabions and Mattresses .....................................................................................4 2.2 General specification for Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link netting...............................4 2.3 Standard sizes of Link Gabions, Mattresses and Netting ........................................................6 2.4 Durability of Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link Netting ..................................................7 2.5 Geotextile filter specification ....................................................................................................7 2.6 Rock infill specification .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Borehole Drilling As a Cost-Effective Solution for Drinking
    water Review Manual Borehole Drilling as a Cost-Effective Solution for Drinking Water Access in Low-Income Contexts Pedro Martínez-Santos 1,* , Miguel Martín-Loeches 2, Silvia Díaz-Alcaide 1 and Kerstin Danert 3 1 Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Geología, Geografía y Medio Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad de Alcalá, Campus Universitario, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Ask for Water GmbH, Zürcherstr 204F, 9014 St Gallen, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-659-969-338 Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: Water access remains a challenge in rural areas of low-income countries. Manual drilling technologies have the potential to enhance water access by providing a low cost drinking water alternative for communities in low and middle income countries. This paper provides an overview of the main successes and challenges experienced by manual boreholes in the last two decades. A review of the existing methods is provided, discussing their advantages and disadvantages and comparing their potential against alternatives such as excavated wells and mechanized boreholes. Manual boreholes are found to be a competitive solution in relatively soft rocks, such as unconsolidated sediments and weathered materials, as well as and in hydrogeological settings characterized by moderately shallow water tables. Ensuring professional workmanship, the development of regulatory frameworks, protection against groundwater pollution and standards for quality assurance rank among the main challenges for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Water-Level Variations on Slope Stability
    ISSN: 1402-1757 ISBN 978-91-7439-XXX-X Se i listan och fyll i siffror där kryssen är LICENTIATE T H E SIS Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering1 Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering Jens Johansson Impact of Johansson Jens ISSN 1402-1757 Impact of Water-Level Variations ISBN 978-91-7439-958-5 (print) ISBN 978-91-7439-959-2 (pdf) on Slope Stability Luleå University of Technology 2014 Water-Level Variations on Slope Stability Variations Water-Level Jens Johansson LICENTIATE THESIS Impact of Water-Level Variations on Slope Stability Jens M. A. Johansson Luleå University of Technology Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering Printed by Luleå University of Technology, Graphic Production 2014 ISSN 1402-1757 ISBN 978-91-7439-958-5 (print) ISBN 978-91-7439-959-2 (pdf) Luleå 2014 www.ltu.se Preface PREFACE This work has been carried out at the Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering at the Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources, at Luleå University of Technology. The research has been supported by the Swedish Hydropower Centre, SVC; established by the Swedish Energy Agency, Elforsk and Svenska Kraftnät together with Luleå University of Technology, The Royal Institute of Technology, Chalmers University of Technology and Uppsala University. I would like to thank Professor Sven Knutsson and Dr. Tommy Edeskär for their support and supervision. I also want to thank all my colleagues and friends at the university for contributing to pleasant working days. Jens Johansson, June 2014 i Impact of water-level variations on slope stability ii Abstract ABSTRACT Waterfront-soil slopes are exposed to water-level fluctuations originating from either natural sources, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design Through Q and Rmi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass
    applied sciences Article An Empirical Approach for Tunnel Support Design through Q and RMi Systems in Fractured Rock Mass Jaekook Lee 1, Hafeezur Rehman 1,2, Abdul Muntaqim Naji 1,3, Jung-Joo Kim 4 and Han-Kyu Yoo 1,* 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 426-791, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (H.R.); [email protected] (A.M.N.) 2 Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 3 Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta 87300, Pakistan 4 Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-400-5147; Fax: +82-31-409-4104 Received: 26 November 2018; Accepted: 14 December 2018; Published: 18 December 2018 Abstract: Empirical systems for the classification of rock mass are used primarily for preliminary support design in tunneling. When applying the existing acceptable international systems for tunnel preliminary supports in high-stress environments, the tunneling quality index (Q) and the rock mass index (RMi) systems that are preferred over geomechanical classification due to the stress characterization parameters that are incorporated into the two systems. However, these two systems are not appropriate when applied in a location where the rock is jointed and experiencing high stresses. This paper empirically extends the application of the two systems to tunnel support design in excavations in such locations.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Soil Dilatancy
    The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Cox, Melissa Reiko Brooke Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 03:25:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195563 THE INFLUENCE OF GRAIN SHAPE ON DILATANCY by MELISSA REIKO BROOKE COX ________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING In the Graduate College THE UNIVERISTY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 8 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Melissa Reiko Brooke Cox entitled The Influence of Grain Shape on Dilatancy and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Muniram Budhu ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Achintya Haldar ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 Chandrakant S. Desai ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: October 17, 2008 John M. Kemeny Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Work for Soil Boring and Well Installation at the Rockaway Borough Well Field Site Morris County, New Jersey
    SDMS Document 68234 EPA CONTRACT NUMBER: 68-01-7250 EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER: 251-2L81 EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED STATEMENT OF WORK FOR SOIL BORING AND WELL INSTALLATION AT THE ROCKAWAY BOROUGH WELL FIELD SITE MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY OCTOBER, 1989 Prepared by: Approved by: CMvOAji' Lu.^:, Edward W. Blanar Dev R. Sachdev, Ph.D. P.E. Site Manager Regional Manager Region II w S o o NJ O o VD -CO-^ , TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 B. SITE GEOLOGY 1 C. HYDROGEOLOGY 4 D. SCOPE OF WORK 5 E. HEALTH AND SAFETY 11 II, SPECIAL CONDITIONS 12- A. SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS 12 B. WORK PROVIDED BY SUBCONTRACTOR 14 C. WORK PROVIDED BY EBASCO 16 D. HEALTH AND SAFETY 17 E. PROJECT SCHEDULE 17 F. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 18 G. SUBMITTALS AND DELIVERABLES 21 H. PRICE SUMMARY FORM 22 III. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 25 A. CODES AND STANDARDS 25 B. MONITORING WELLS, AND SOIL BORING 25 C. DECONTAMINATION 30 D. RECORDS 31 FIGURES 1 Site Location Map 2 2 Rockaway Borough Site Map 3 3 Proposed Well Locations 6 4 Proposed Soil Boring Locations 10 5 Typical Groundwater Monitoring Well 28 TABLES Summary of Monitoring Well Depths and Screen Lengths ATTACHMENTS 1. Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) 2. Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan for REM III Pre-Bid Site Visits 3. Medical Surveillance Program 4. Quality Assurance Nonconformance Report s? 5. Direction to Site 4 6. Standard Specifications for Sealing o Abandoned Wells o NJ O o I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Borough of Rockaway (Rockaway Borough) is located in central Morris County, New Jersey (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics
    Slope Stability 101 Basic Concepts and NOT for Final Design Purposes! Slope Stability Analysis Basics Shear Strength of Soils Ability of soil to resist sliding on itself on the slope Angle of Repose definition n1. the maximum angle to the horizontal at which rocks, soil, etc, will remain without sliding Shear Strength Parameters and Soils Info Φ angle of internal friction C cohesion (clays are cohesive and sands are non-cohesive) Θ slope angle γ unit weight of soil Internal Angles of Friction Estimates for our use in example Silty sand Φ = 25 degrees Loose sand Φ = 30 degrees Medium to Dense sand Φ = 35 degrees Rock Riprap Φ = 40 degrees Slope Stability Analysis Basics Explore Site Geology Characterize soil shear strength Construct slope stability model Establish seepage and groundwater conditions Select loading condition Locate critical failure surface Iterate until minimum Factor of Safety (FS) is achieved Rules of Thumb and “Easy” Method of Estimating Slope Stability Geology and Soils Information Needed (from site or soils database) Check appropriate loading conditions (seeps, rapid drawdown, fluctuating water levels, flows) Select values to input for Φ and C Locate water table in slope (critical for evaluation!) 2:1 slopes are typically stable for less than 15 foot heights Note whether or not existing slopes are vegetated and stable Plan for a factor of safety (hazards evaluation) FS between 1.4 and 1.5 is typically adequate for our purposes No Flow Slope Stability Analysis FS = tan Φ / tan Θ Where Φ is the effective
    [Show full text]
  • Volume :4 2017-2018
    VOLUME :4 2017-2018 A Civil Engineering Magazine Civil-o-sphere by Department of Civil Engineering Technique Polytechnic Institute ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION A DETAIL DESIGN OF AN TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION OVERHANGING T-BEAM ROOF A NEW WAY TO MEASURE THE BUILDING WITH WASTE STRENGTH OF MODERN FORMS OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE FLOORING A DETAIL ESTIMATION OF A WELL FOUNDATION MIVAN TECHNOLOGY A 1 Vision of Our Institute To make Technique Polytechnic Institute a CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE in learning, teaching and knowledge transfer in an ambience of Humanity, Wisdom, Intellect, Knowledge, Creativity and Innovation in order to nurture our students to become culturally and ethically rich professionals with bright future of our country. Institute Mission Statements 1. To provide Knowledge with Academic Excellence and to prepare our students for their successful professional career. 2. To inspire our Faculty members to always Excel and in turn Motivate the Students to achieve Excellence. 3. To provide a stimulating learning environment with a technological orientation to maximize individual Potential. 4. To develop innovative and efficient use of modern instructional technology. 5. To ensure our students of all ability levels are well equipped to meet the challenges of education, work and life. 6. To encourage development of interdisciplinary research, which addresses strategic needs of industry and society. 7. To encourage and support professional development for faculty and staff. 8. To educate and prepare students to contribute as engineers and citizens through the creation, integration, application, and transfer of engineering knowledge 2 Vision of the department: The Vision of the Civil Engineering Department is to develop high quality Diploma Engin eers with sound pragmatic knowledge, strong sense of ethical values and good team work working & management capabilities whose collective energy will be the driving force to render the social needs with the ability to keep pace with rapidly changing global technologies.
    [Show full text]